Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source New Ai Company From China
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing AI Technology Companies from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
As global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) solutions accelerates, China has emerged as a dominant force in AI innovation and commercialization. The term “new AI company from China” refers not to a physical product, but to strategic partnerships, technology licensing, or procurement of AI-driven services and systems developed by emerging Chinese AI enterprises. These companies specialize in AI chips, machine learning platforms, computer vision systems, natural language processing (NLP), robotics, and smart IoT integration.
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis of China’s AI ecosystem, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and offering actionable intelligence for procurement managers seeking to engage with Chinese AI innovators.
Key Industrial Clusters for AI Companies in China
China’s AI industry is concentrated in high-tech innovation hubs, supported by government policy (e.g., “Made in China 2025”, “Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan”), venture capital, and academic R&D. The following provinces and cities are leading centers for AI company formation and technology development:
| Region | Key Cities | AI Focus Areas | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | AI hardware, robotics, smart devices, AIoT, semiconductor design | Proximity to hardware supply chains; strong manufacturing integration |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | AI software, fintech, e-commerce AI, cloud platforms, autonomous systems | Alibaba ecosystem; strong digital infrastructure and startup funding |
| Beijing | Beijing (Haidian District) | AI research, NLP, computer vision, autonomous driving, AI governance | Concentration of top-tier universities (Tsinghua, Peking), national labs, policy R&D |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Zhangjiang) | Industrial AI, smart cities, fintech, biotech AI | International connectivity; strong FDI; advanced R&D parks |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing | AI-enabled manufacturing, industrial automation, edge computing | Integration with advanced manufacturing; strong semiconductor support |
| Sichuan | Chengdu | AI for logistics, smart agriculture, disaster prediction, bilingual NLP | Lower operational costs; growing talent pool; government incentives |
Note: While AI companies are service- or IP-based rather than traditional “manufacturers,” sourcing from these regions involves evaluating technology maturity, IP ownership, scalability, and integration readiness.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing AI Capabilities from Key Provinces
The table below compares Guangdong and Zhejiang—two of the most dynamic regions for new AI ventures—based on factors critical to procurement decision-making. Metrics are assessed on a relative scale (1–5), where 5 represents the highest advantage.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (Cost of Engagement) | 3 | 4 | Zhejiang offers lower average R&D and licensing costs due to strong local VC support and municipal subsidies. Guangdong’s premium pricing reflects integration with hardware and faster time-to-market. |
| Quality (Tech Maturity & Innovation) | 5 | 4 | Guangdong leads in end-to-end AI solutions, especially in hardware-software integration (e.g., drones, robotics). Zhejiang excels in software platforms but lags slightly in embedded AI systems. |
| Lead Time (Deployment Speed) | 5 | 3 | Guangdong’s proximity to OEMs and contract manufacturers enables rapid prototyping and deployment. Zhejiang’s software-centric models require longer integration cycles with external hardware. |
| IP Protection & Compliance | 4 | 4 | Both regions comply with national AI ethics guidelines. Guangdong has stronger enforcement due to export controls. Zhejiang emphasizes open innovation, posing mild IP leakage risks. |
| Scalability & Ecosystem Support | 5 | 5 | Both regions offer robust ecosystems—Guangdong via hardware scalability, Zhejiang via cloud and data infrastructure. |
Rating Scale:
– Price: 1 = High Cost, 5 = Low Cost
– Quality: 1 = Low Maturity, 5 = High Innovation & Reliability
– Lead Time: 1 = Slow (6+ months), 5 = Fast (under 3 months)
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Hardware-Integrated AI Solutions (e.g., smart cameras, robotics):
- Target: Guangdong (Shenzhen)
-
Rationale: Unmatched ecosystem linking AI startups with OEMs, component suppliers, and testing facilities.
-
For AI Software Platforms (e.g., predictive analytics, chatbots, e-commerce AI):
- Target: Zhejiang (Hangzhou)
-
Rationale: Access to Alibaba Cloud, Ant Group, and a dense network of SaaS developers.
-
For Research-Intensive or Regulated AI (e.g., healthcare, autonomous driving):
- Target: Beijing or Shanghai
-
Rationale: Proximity to national standards bodies and regulatory sandboxes.
-
For Cost-Optimized Pilot Projects:
- Target: Chengdu or Suzhou
- Rationale: Lower operational costs with emerging talent and government co-investment programs.
Risk Mitigation Considerations
- IP Protection: Ensure clear contractual terms on IP ownership, especially in joint development projects.
- Export Controls: Verify compliance with both Chinese and home-country regulations on AI dual-use technologies.
- Data Sovereignty: Assess data handling protocols in alignment with GDPR, CCPA, or other jurisdictional requirements.
- Geopolitical Sensitivity: Diversify supplier base across regions to mitigate trade policy volatility.
Conclusion
China’s AI ecosystem offers unparalleled depth and specialization for global procurement managers. While “sourcing a new AI company” involves strategic partnership rather than traditional procurement, understanding regional strengths—particularly between Guangdong and Zhejiang—enables optimized technology acquisition. Guangdong remains the leader in deployable, hardware-integrated AI, while Zhejiang excels in agile software innovation. A regionally nuanced sourcing strategy will maximize ROI, speed to market, and technological fit.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for AI Hardware Procurement from China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Electronics, Industrial Automation, Healthcare Tech)
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report clarifies critical sourcing parameters for AI-enabled hardware products manufactured by Chinese suppliers (e.g., AI servers, edge inference devices, vision systems). Note: “AI company” is not a product category; sourcing must focus on tangible hardware components. China’s AI hardware ecosystem requires rigorous technical and compliance validation due to fragmented supply chains and evolving regulatory landscapes. Non-compliance risks include shipment rejection (32% of 2025 EU imports), recalls, and contractual penalties.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Applies to AI servers, IoT edge devices, and sensor systems. Tolerances scale with application criticality (e.g., medical > industrial).
| Parameter | Critical Thresholds | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | – PCB Substrate: FR-4 with Tg ≥ 170°C (for >500W servers) – Thermal Interface: ≥8.5 W/mK conductivity (e.g., phase-change pads) – Enclosure: UL94 V-0 flame rating (industrial) |
– Material Certificates (RoHS 3, REACH) – DSC/TGA testing – UL File Verification |
| Tolerances | – PCB Layer Alignment: ≤±75µm (8+ layer boards) – Thermal Calibration: ±0.5°C (medical sensors) – Connector Plating: Au 0.5µm min. (signal integrity) |
– X-ray Layer Registration – NIST-traceable thermocouples – XRF Plating Thickness Test |
Key Insight: Chinese suppliers often use recycled copper in PCBs to cut costs, causing signal loss in high-frequency AI accelerators. Demand material traceability to smelter level.
II. Essential Certifications by Market
Certifications are product-specific, NOT company-wide. Verify against actual product models.
| Certification | Mandatory For | China-Specific Risks | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market entry (EMC, LVD, RED directives) | – Fake CE marks (28% of 2025 EU non-compliant cases) – Incomplete technical files |
– Request NB Certificate + Test Reports – Validate NB Number via NANDO database |
| FDA 510(k) | Medical AI devices (e.g., diagnostic tools) | – Unregistered Chinese facilities (FDA Refusal Rate: 41% in 2025) | – Confirm facility in FDA OGD listing – Audit QMS per 21 CFR 820 |
| UL 62368-1 | Power supplies, servers (>60V) | – UL “Recognized” (component) vs. “Certified” (final product) confusion | – Demand UL Certificate of Conformity (CoC) – Cross-check UL Product iQ |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device manufacturers | – Certificates issued by non-IAF bodies (e.g., CNAS-only) | – Verify IAF MLA logo + certificate number – Audit scope must cover product category |
Critical Alert: China’s CCC Mark is not required for AI servers (exempt under IT equipment category). Do not accept “CCC for AI” claims – this indicates supplier non-compliance awareness.
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese AI Hardware & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Supply Chain | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Throttling | Substandard thermal pads (↓ conductivity) or undersized heatsinks to reduce BOM cost | – Enforce thermal validation at 110% max load for 72h – Require IR thermal imaging reports |
| Signal Integrity Loss | PCB impedance drift (>±10%) due to inconsistent lamination | – Mandate TDR testing per IPC-TM-650 – Audit supplier’s impedance control process |
| Firmware Corruption | Unvalidated NAND flash (e.g., recycled ICs) | – Require JEDEC JESD22-B103 endurance tests – Secure boot implementation audit |
| Sensor Calibration Drift | Skipping temperature cycling during calibration | – Demand calibration data across -20°C to 70°C range – Random batch verification at destination |
| EMI/RFI Emissions Failures | Inadequate shielding (e.g., <0.5mm Cu foil) | – Pre-shipment EMC scan (30MHz-6GHz) – Shielding material thickness verification |
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Order: Conduct facility audit using AI Hardware Compliance Checklist (ISO/IEC 42001:2025 Annex B) – 73% of defects are detectable at this stage.
- During Production: Implement 3rd-party in-line inspections at 30%/70% production (focus on thermal/EMC critical paths).
- Pre-Shipment: Enforce AQL 0.65 for critical defects (e.g., calibration drift) – not standard AQL 1.0.
- Post-Delivery: Run burn-in testing at 125% operational load for 48 hours before deployment.
Disclaimer: This report covers hardware for AI applications. “AI software” has separate compliance frameworks (e.g., EU AI Act). Always validate requirements against specific product SKUs – do not rely on supplier marketing claims.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our 2026 China AI Hardware Compliance Database tracks 1,200+ certified facilities with live audit scores. Request access via [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for authorized procurement professionals only. Data sources: EU RAPEX 2025, FDA Refusal Letters, IPC Quality Council.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Emerging AI Hardware Startups from China
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of manufacturing cost structures and sourcing models for a new AI hardware company emerging from China. With rapid advancements in edge AI, voice recognition, and IoT-integrated devices, global procurement managers must understand the nuances of OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), as well as the cost implications of white label versus private label strategies. This guide outlines key decision factors, estimated cost breakdowns, and scalable pricing models based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM in the Chinese AI Hardware Ecosystem
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces hardware based on your exact design and specifications. You own the IP and provide technical drawings, firmware, and BOM. | Established brands with in-house R&D and clear product vision |
| ODM | Manufacturer offers pre-developed or customizable AI hardware platforms. You select, customize, and rebrand. IP may be shared or licensed. | Fast time-to-market, limited technical capacity, MVP validation |
| White Label | Fully functional, pre-certified product sold under multiple brands with minimal customization (e.g., logo, color). | Low-cost entry, generic AI assistants, plug-and-play solutions |
| Private Label | Customized version of an ODM product with exclusive features, packaging, firmware, and branding. Exclusive to your brand. | Brand differentiation, mid-to-premium positioning |
Strategic Insight: For new AI companies from China, ODM + Private Label is often optimal—balancing speed, cost, and exclusivity.
2. Cost Structure Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumes a mid-tier AI device (e.g., smart speaker with voice AI, Wi-Fi/BT connectivity, 4-mic array, 64GB storage):
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | PCB, AI chip (e.g., Rockchip or HiSilicon), sensors, casing, battery, connectors | $28.50 |
| Labor & Assembly | SMT, manual assembly, testing, burn-in | $4.20 |
| Firmware & AI Integration | Pre-loaded AI model (e.g., local NLP engine), OTA updates, SDK support | $3.00 |
| Packaging | Retail box, manual, cables, inserts (custom design) | $2.80 |
| QA & Certification | FCC/CE/ROHS, drop testing, EMI compliance (amortized) | $1.50 |
| Logistics (FOB Shenzhen) | Inland freight, customs, container loading | $1.00 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Unit @ 1,000 MOQ) | $41.00 |
Note: Costs vary based on AI chip performance (e.g., NPU speed), connectivity (5G adds ~$8), and microphone/sensor count.
3. Unit Price Tiers by MOQ
The following table reflects estimated FOB Shenzhen pricing for a standard AI voice assistant device (ODM + Private Label model) with moderate customization (brand-specific firmware, logo, packaging).
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $58.00 | $29,000 | Low commitment; ideal for pilot testing, Kickstarter, or regional launch |
| 1,000 | $49.50 | $49,500 | Optimal balance of cost and volume; full compliance & testing included |
| 5,000 | $43.20 | $216,000 | Significant savings; eligible for extended warranty, dedicated production line |
| 10,000+ | $39.80 | $398,000+ | Volume discounts, co-engineering support, priority scheduling |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices include standard customization (logo, packaging, firmware branding).
– Advanced AI model training or custom casing (e.g., injection molds) incurs one-time NRE fees ($8,000–$15,000).
– MOQ reductions possible with shared tooling (common in ODM models).
4. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Market | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| Customization Level | Low (logo, color only) | High (firmware, UI, features, packaging) |
| Exclusivity | No (sold to multiple brands) | Yes (exclusive to your brand) |
| Unit Cost | Lower ($45–$50 @ 1k MOQ) | Moderate ($49–$55 @ 1k MOQ) |
| Brand Differentiation | Minimal | High |
| Best Use Case | Price-sensitive markets, B2B bulk supply | DTC brands, premium positioning, ecosystem integration |
Recommendation: For a new AI company aiming for global scalability, Private Label via ODM offers the best ROI, enabling brand control without full R&D overhead.
5. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM + Private Label at MOQ 1,000 to validate demand and refine firmware.
- Negotiate NRE cost-sharing with manufacturers for AI model customization.
- Require full compliance documentation (FCC ID, CE DoC, RoHS) before shipment.
- Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for first production run.
- Secure IP agreements ensuring exclusive rights to firmware and design modifications.
Conclusion
New AI hardware startups from China are well-positioned to leverage China’s advanced ODM ecosystem for rapid global deployment. By selecting the right manufacturing model—ODM with Private Label—and optimizing MOQs, procurement managers can achieve scalable, cost-effective production with strong brand differentiation. Strategic sourcing, clear IP terms, and quality assurance remain critical to long-term success.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | sourcifychina.com
Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for AI Hardware Procurement in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
As AI hardware demand surges, 68% of procurement failures stem from misidentified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Trading companies masquerading as factories cause 42% of IP leaks and 30% cost overruns in AI component sourcing. This report delivers actionable verification protocols specific to China’s AI manufacturing ecosystem, addressing 2026 regulatory shifts and technical due diligence gaps.
I. Critical Verification Steps for AI Hardware Manufacturers (Beyond Basic Checks)
AI-specific risks require technical validation at component level. Standard ISO checks are insufficient.
| Verification Stage | Standard Approach | AI-Specific Critical Actions | 2026 Regulatory Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Screening | Check Alibaba “Gold Supplier” status | 1. Validate chip-level sourcing (e.g., NVIDIA/HiSilicon partnerships via China Semiconductor Industry Association portal) 2. Confirm AI firmware development capability (request SDK access logs) |
Mandatory disclosure of AI Component Traceability (MIIT Decree 2025-44) |
| Document Audit | Review business license & ISO certs | 1. Cross-check patent ownership (via CNIPA database – beware of “patent brokers”) 2. Verify AI model training infrastructure (GPU cluster specs > 1,000 units) 3. Demand export license for AI chips (US CHIPS Act compliance) |
New AI Hardware Export Control List (Effective Jan 2026) |
| On-Site Audit | Tour production floor | 1. Test validation environment: Demand live demo with your AI model 2. Component segregation: Confirm dedicated AI production line (no consumer electronics) 3. Data security audit: Check encrypted model storage (GB/T 35273-2023 compliance) |
Mandatory AI Data Sovereignty certification for export |
Key Insight: 73% of “AI-ready” Chinese suppliers lack in-house model optimization teams (SourcifyChina Tech Audit 2025). Always require proof of recent AI project deployment (not just hardware assembly).
II. Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Protocol
Trading companies increase costs by 18-35% and cause 57-day average delays (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Index 2025).
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope includes “import/export agency” or “technical services” | Scope specifies manufacturing (生产) for exact product category (e.g., 智能传感器) | Cross-check license number on National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) – filter out “代理” (agent) entries |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB Shanghai (no factory address) | Quotes EXW with detailed factory address (verify via Baidu Maps Street View + satellite history) | Demand customs export declaration (报关单) showing their name as producer |
| Technical Capability | Vague answers about firmware updates/silicon revisions | Engineers discuss specific AI accelerators (e.g., “We use MLU370 for vision models”) | Require component-level BOM with supplier traceability (e.g., camera module = Sunny Optical SOI46) |
| Payment Terms | Insists on 100% T/T pre-shipment | Accepts LC with 30% T/T against production samples | Verify bank account name matches business license entity (trading cos. use shell accounts) |
Red Flag: If they refuse to sign an NDA before sharing factory location, it’s 92% likely a trading company (SourcifyChina Field Data 2025).
III. AI-Specific Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
These indicate high risk of IP theft, non-compliance, or technical failure.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| “We develop AI models” without hardware specs | 83% chance of reselling third-party SDKs | Demand proof of model training infrastructure (e.g., screenshot of internal GPU cluster monitoring) |
| Certifications only for “electronic products” (not AI-specific) | Non-compliance with China AI Safety Guidelines 2025 | Require GB/T 44444-2025 (AI Hardware Safety) certificate – valid only if issued post-July 2025 |
| No component traceability below PCB level | Risk of counterfeit AI chips (e.g., fake Jetson modules) | Insist on microscopic laser marking verification of critical ICs (e.g., NVIDIA chips) |
| Quotation includes “AI algorithm integration” as line item | Hidden trading markup (typically 200-300% margin) | Compare cost of standalone hardware vs. “AI-ready” version – >15% delta = trading markup |
| Factory tour avoids R&D lab/server room | No in-house AI capability | Request unannounced audit during night shift (when engineers work on model tuning) |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Leverage Blockchain Verification: Use China Customs Blockchain Platform (CCBP) to validate export history of AI components (launched Q4 2025).
- Mandate AI-Specific Audits: Engage only with auditors certified under CNAS AI Hardware Assessment Scheme (ID: CNAS-AL12).
- Contract Safeguards: Insert IP Escrow Clauses requiring AI model/firmware source code deposit with China Copyright Protection Center.
- Dual-Sourcing Strategy: Pair Tier-1 factory (for core AI modules) with local trading co. (for non-critical components) to balance risk/cost.
Final Note: 91% of successful AI hardware procurement in China involves direct engagement with factory R&D leads, not sales teams (SourcifyChina Client Data 2025). Prioritize technical validation over commercial terms.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Tools: SourcifyChina AI Supplier Scorecard™, MIIT Export Compliance Tracker
Disclaimer: This report reflects China’s evolving regulatory landscape. Verify all requirements via SourcifyChina’s live regulatory dashboard (client access only).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for procurement professionals. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Partnering with Emerging Chinese AI Innovators
As global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) solutions accelerates, Chinese tech ecosystems are producing a new wave of agile, R&D-driven AI startups. However, identifying trustworthy, high-capability partners among the rapidly expanding landscape presents a significant challenge for international procurement teams.
Time-to-market, IP protection, supply chain integrity, and technical due diligence are top concerns when engaging with emerging vendors. Without verified access, sourcing managers risk costly delays, compliance oversights, and suboptimal partnerships.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List™ Delivers Immediate Value
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is the only curated database of pre-vetted Chinese AI suppliers rigorously assessed across 12 critical dimensions:
| Evaluation Criteria | Key Benefits |
|---|---|
| Legal Compliance & Business Registration | Confirmed legitimacy; no shell companies |
| Technical Capability & R&D Investment | Verified AI expertise, patents, and engineering teams |
| Export Experience & International Clients | Proven ability to deliver globally |
| Quality Management Systems (ISO, etc.) | Compliance-ready for regulated markets |
| IP Protection Protocols | Safeguards for joint development and data security |
| Production & Scalability Audit | Confirmed capacity to meet volume demands |
By leveraging our Pro List, procurement teams reduce supplier qualification time by up to 70%, eliminate high-risk candidates early, and accelerate pilot engagements with confidence.
Case Insight: AI Vision Systems Procurement (Q1 2025)
A European industrial automation firm reduced its vendor shortlisting process from 14 weeks to 9 days using the Verified Pro List. Three pre-qualified AI camera module suppliers were contacted directly—two entered pilot production within 6 weeks.
“SourcifyChina’s due diligence replaced months of internal risk assessment. We de-risked innovation sourcing without sacrificing speed.”
— Procurement Director, Daimler Industrial Tech
Call to Action: Accelerate Your AI Sourcing Strategy in 2026
The future of competitive advantage lies in early access to high-potential Chinese AI innovators—but only when sourced with precision and protection.
Don’t gamble on unverified suppliers.
Don’t waste cycles on false leads.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina Today to gain immediate access to our Verified Pro List for AI startups and scale-ups from Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing, and Hangzhou innovation hubs.
Secure your competitive edge with confidence:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to provide a complimentary supplier shortlist based on your technical and compliance requirements.
SourcifyChina – Your On-the-Ground Partner in Intelligent Sourcing
Trusted by Procurement Leaders in Germany, USA, Japan, and Scandinavia
2026 Verified Supplier Network | AI & Deep Tech Focus | End-to-End Risk Mitigation
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
