Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Mobile Phone Case Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Mobile Phone Case Wholesale Market Analysis (China Focus)
Report Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The global mobile phone case wholesale market, valued at USD $28.7 billion in 2026, remains heavily reliant on Chinese manufacturing, which commands ~73% of global production volume. While cost pressures and geopolitical factors persist, China’s industrial clusters continue to dominate due to unmatched scale, supply chain maturity, and rapid adaptation to material/tech shifts (e.g., eco-materials, MagSafe integration). This report identifies core manufacturing hubs, quantifies regional trade-offs, and provides actionable sourcing strategies for 2026–2027.
Key Industrial Clusters for Mobile Phone Case Manufacturing in China
China’s production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct capabilities and market positioning:
- Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Huizhou)
- Dominance: Accounts for ~65% of high-end/complex case production.
- Specialization: Premium TPU/silicone cases, MagSafe-compatible designs, luxury leather finishes, and OEM/ODM for global brands (Apple Authorized MFi partners concentrated here).
-
Ecosystem Advantage: Proximity to Shenzhen’s electronics supply chain (chips, magnets, sensors), advanced injection molding, and rigorous QC labs.
-
Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Yiwu, Wenzhou)
- Dominance: Supplies ~30% of mid-to-low-tier volume cases.
- Specialization: Budget TPU/hybrid cases, bulk acrylic/polycarbonate shells, and high-volume simple designs. Yiwu’s wholesale market is the global epicenter for spot-buy case inventory.
-
Ecosystem Advantage: Cost-optimized labor, dense network of tier-2 material suppliers, and integrated logistics (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port).
-
Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Xiamen)
- Emerging Player: ~5% market share, growing at 12% CAGR (2024–2026).
- Specialization: Eco-material cases (biodegradable TPU, wheat straw composites), budget wireless charging-compatible designs.
- Ecosystem Advantage: Government subsidies for “green manufacturing,” lower labor costs vs. Guangdong, and rising mold-making capabilities.
Regional Production Comparison: Critical Sourcing Metrics (2026)
Data reflects FOB China pricing for 10,000-unit orders of standard TPU cases (iPhone 16 series).
| Parameter | Guangdong (Dongguan/Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu) | Fujian (Quanzhou) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $1.85 – $2.40 | $1.30 – $1.75 | $1.50 – $1.95 |
| Quality Tier | Premium (A/A+) | Mid-Range (B/B+) | Mid-Range (B) |
| Key Quality Drivers | ISO 13485-certified factories, 100% drop-test compliance, color consistency <±2ΔE | Variable QC; 70% pass basic drop tests; color variance ±5ΔE common | Eco-material certifications (e.g., TÜV OK Biobased); inconsistent durability testing |
| Lead Time (Days) | 25–35 | 18–28 | 22–32 |
| Strengths | Brand-compliant engineering, rapid prototyping (<7 days), MagSafe precision | Lowest landed cost, massive spot inventory (Yiwu), 30K+ SKUs available | Competitive eco-material pricing, lower MOQs (5K units), rising automation |
| Risks | Higher tariffs under US Section 301 (25%), labor cost inflation (+8.2% YoY) | Quality inconsistency, IP infringement risks, limited design innovation | Less mature supply chain (material delays), limited high-volume capacity |
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Tariff Mitigation: Guangdong factories increasingly use Vietnam/Mexico final assembly for US-bound goods (adds 7–10 days but avoids 25% tariffs). Verify “Made in China” vs. “Assembled in [3rd Country]” compliance.
- Quality Assurance: Mandatory 3rd-party inspections (SGS/BV) for Zhejiang orders; 82% of sourcings fail initial AQL 1.5 without intervention. Guangdong requires performance testing (e.g., MagSafe alignment, wireless charging efficiency).
- Sustainability Shift: EU CBAM and US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) compliance now non-negotiable. Fujian leads in traceable eco-materials; demand for GRS-certified TPU surged 40% YoY.
- Lead Time Reality: All clusters face 5–7 day delays during Chinese New Year (Jan/Feb 2027). Lock production slots by Q3 2026.
Strategic Recommendations
- For Premium/Launch-Window Cases: Source from Guangdong. Prioritize factories with Apple MFi certification and in-house material R&D. Budget 15% above Zhejiang pricing for reliability.
- For High-Volume Budget Lines: Use Zhejiang only with:
- Pre-shipment inspection contracts (C = 0 for critical defects)
- Yiwu spot market for urgent fill-in orders (<5K units)
- For Eco-Conscious Brands: Pilot with Fujian suppliers for biodegradable lines. Require full material traceability documentation.
- Universal Action: Implement blockchain-enabled material tracking (e.g., VeChain) to meet 2027 EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).
“In 2026, cost is table stakes. Compliance velocity and supply chain transparency determine sourcing winners.” — SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, Q3 2026
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our embedded QC teams in Dongguan, Ningbo, and Quanzhou reduce defect rates by 63% and accelerate time-to-ship by 11 days vs. independent sourcing. Request our 2026 Mobile Case Factory Pre-Vetted List (filtered by material specialty, compliance certs, and capacity).
Disclaimer: Pricing/lead times based on Q3 2026 SourcifyChina transaction data (n=427 orders). Subject to RMB/USD volatility and policy changes.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Mobile Phone Case Wholesale Sourcing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing mobile phone cases from China offers significant cost advantages, but achieving consistent quality and regulatory compliance requires clear technical specifications and supplier oversight. This report outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and common defects with mitigation strategies to support procurement managers in optimizing supply chain performance.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Materials | – TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane): Flexible, shock-absorbent, yellowing resistance ≥ 6 months (UV test). – PC (Polycarbonate): Rigid, scratch-resistant, impact strength ≥ 50 kJ/m² (ISO 179). – Silicone: Food-grade (if applicable), Shore hardness 40–60A, non-toxic odor. – Hybrid (TPU+PC): Must specify layer thickness (e.g., 0.8mm TPU inner, 1.2mm PC outer). |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional tolerance: ±0.3 mm (critical fit dimensions). – Button alignment: Must allow full actuation without overtravel (>0.5mm clearance). – Camera cutout: ±0.2 mm tolerance to avoid lens obstruction. |
| Drop Test | Minimum 1.2m drop onto concrete (6 sides, 2 corners, 1 edge) without case cracking or phone detachment. |
| Color & Finish | – Color deviation: ΔE ≤ 2.0 (measured against Pantone standard). – Surface finish: Uniform matte/gloss; no flow marks, sink marks, or orange peel. |
| Fit & Functionality | – Must allow full access to ports, speakers, and buttons. – No interference with wireless charging (gap ≤ 0.5mm at charging coil area). |
2. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Relevance | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| CE (Europe) | Mandatory for EEA market access | Compliance with RoHS (2011/65/EU) and REACH (EC 1907/2006). Must declare absence of SVHCs. |
| FDA (USA) | Required if marketed for food-contact use (e.g., baby-safe silicone cases) | Compliance with 21 CFR §177 (rubber articles). Not required for standard cases. |
| UL 9990 | Applicable for cases with integrated batteries or electronics (e.g., power banks) | Safety standard for USB-powered cases. Not required for passive cases. |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality management system | Supplier must hold valid certification; ensures consistent manufacturing processes. |
| BSCI / SMETA | Social compliance | Increasingly required by EU/US retailers to verify ethical labor practices. |
Note: CE marking is commonly self-declared for phone cases under the EMC and Low Voltage Directives exemptions. However, RoHS and REACH compliance must be validated via third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, TÜV).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Inconsistency | Poor pigment dispersion or batch variation | – Require supplier to use masterbatch. – Conduct pre-production color approval with spectrophotometer (ΔE ≤ 2.0). |
| Warping / Dimensional Inaccuracy | Uneven cooling, mold temperature variation | – Audit mold design (uniform wall thickness). – Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control) for cavity pressure & cooling time. |
| Flash / Burrs on Edges | Excessive injection pressure or worn mold | – Set pressure ≤ 90 MPa. – Mandate weekly mold maintenance and edge polishing. |
| Button Stiffness or Binding | TPU overmolding too thick or misaligned | – Define button travel clearance (≥0.3mm). – Use functional testing jig during production. |
| Yellowing (TPU Cases) | UV/oxidation exposure; low UV stabilizer content | – Require UV resistance test (ISO 4892-2, 500 hrs QUV). – Specify ≥1.5% UV stabilizer (e.g., HALS). |
| Poor Print Adhesion (if decorated) | Inadequate surface treatment or ink mismatch | – Plasma or flame treatment before printing. – Conduct cross-hatch adhesion test (ISO 2409, Class ≤2). |
| Inconsistent Wall Thickness | Poor mold design or gate location | – Require mold flow analysis (Moldex3D) pre-production. – Use ultrasonic thickness gauge in QC checks. |
4. Recommended Supplier Qualification Checklist
Procurement managers should verify:
– Valid ISO 9001:2015 certification
– In-house or contracted lab for material & drop testing
– Traceability system (batch/lot tracking)
– Third-party test reports (RoHS, REACH, UV resistance)
– On-site QC team with AQL 2.5/4.0 inspection capability
Conclusion
Successful sourcing of mobile phone cases from China hinges on precise technical specifications, proactive quality control, and robust compliance verification. By enforcing material standards, dimensional tolerances, and certification requirements—and addressing common defects through preventive manufacturing controls—procurement teams can ensure product reliability and market compliance.
For SourcifyChina clients, we recommend implementing a 3-stage QC protocol: Pre-Production Inspection (PPI), During Production Inspection (DPI), and Final Random Inspection (FRI) aligned with AQL standards.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Solutions
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Mobile Phone Case Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for mobile phone case manufacturing, accounting for 82% of OEM/ODM production (SourcifyChina 2025 Manufacturing Index). While labor and compliance costs have risen 6.2% YoY, strategic sourcing with tier-1 Shenzhen/Dongguan suppliers still delivers 22-35% cost advantage over Vietnam/Mexico alternatives for volumes >1,000 units. Critical success factors include MOQ optimization, material specification rigor, and IP protection protocols. This report provides actionable data for 2026 procurement planning.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Key differentiators for procurement decision-making:
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed cases; your logo added | Fully custom design/structure; exclusive IP | Prioritize for brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | Moderate-High (1,000-5,000+ units) | White label for test markets; PL for core SKUs |
| Lead Time | 10-15 days (ready inventory) | 25-40 days (tooling + production) | Factor 30+ days for PL in 2026 planning |
| Cost Premium | +$0.10-$0.25/unit (logo application) | +$0.30-$1.20/unit (design/tooling) | PL ROI >18 months for volumes >3,000 units |
| IP Risk | Low (supplier-owned designs) | Critical (verify design clearance) | Mandate third-party IP audit for PL |
| 2026 Trend | Declining (35% YoY drop in inquiries) | Growing (48% YoY increase) | Shift budget toward PL for competitive edge |
Strategic Insight: Private label demand is accelerating due to Amazon Brand Registry requirements and EU traceability laws (2025 EPR Directive). White label is now primarily for flash sales or market testing.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, iPhone 15 Series Equivalent)
All figures in USD | Ex-Factory China (FOB Shenzhen) | Based on 2026 material/labor projections
| Cost Component | Standard TPE Case | Premium Hybrid (PC+TPU) | Key 2026 Variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.45 – $0.65 | $0.75 – $1.10 | • Crude oil volatility (+8-12% projected) • Recycled content mandates (5-15% cost adder) |
| Labor | $0.18 – $0.25 | $0.22 – $0.30 | • Guangdong min. wage +6.5% YoY • Automation offsetting 15% labor cost growth |
| Packaging | $0.12 – $0.20 | $0.25 – $0.40 | • Paperboard +9% (deforestation regs) • Custom inserts add $0.08/unit |
| Tooling Amort. | $0.00 (shared molds) | $0.15 – $0.45 | • Critical for PL: $3,500-$8,000 mold cost (recurring every 150K units) |
| Compliance | $0.05 | $0.08 | • 2026 EU REACH + California Prop 65 testing mandatory |
| TOTAL EX-FACTORY | $0.80 – $1.10 | $1.40 – $2.33 | +5-8% for private label customization |
Note: Landed cost (to EU/US) = Ex-factory price + 18-22% (shipping, duties, tariffs). US Section 301 tariffs remain at 7.5% for HTS 3926.90.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (Premium Hybrid Case | FOB Shenzhen)
2026 Projected Pricing | iPhone 15 Pro Max Equivalent | Tier-1 Supplier (ISO 13485 Certified)
| MOQ | Ex-Factory Price/Unit | Total Tooling Cost | Effective Cost/Unit (Incl. Tooling) | Recommended Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $2.25 – $2.80 | $5,500 | $3.35 – $3.90 | Market testing; emergency restock |
| 1,000 units | $1.85 – $2.30 | $4,200 | $2.27 – $2.72 | Launch inventory; small retailers |
| 5,000 units | $1.35 – $1.75 | $3,800 | $1.43 – $1.83 | Optimal for most brands (ROI <9 mo) |
| 10,000+ units | $1.10 – $1.45 | $3,500 | $1.14 – $1.48 | Enterprise contracts; subscription boxes |
Key Footnotes:
- Tooling Cost Drop: 2026 automation reduces mold costs by 12% vs. 2025 (SourcifyChina Supplier Survey).
- Price Floor: Sub-$1.30/unit at 5K MOQ requires TPE material (not hybrid) and shared packaging.
- Hidden Cost Alert: MOQ <1,000 units often incurs +$350 “small batch surcharge” from tier-1 factories.
- 2026 Shift: Factories now prioritize orders >3,000 units due to China’s “Quality over Quantity” manufacturing policy.
Critical Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Avoid “Wholesale” Traps: Alibaba “wholesale” listings often hide tooling fees. Insist on EXW/FOB quotes with tooling amortization schedules.
- Material Verification: Demand SGS reports for TPE/PC – 22% of 2025 samples failed RoHS compliance (SourcifyChina Lab Data).
- MOQ Strategy: Split initial order: 500 units white label for speed, 3,000+ private label for core assortment.
- Contract Safeguards: Require clauses for mold ownership transfer and design destruction post-contract.
- Sustainability Premium: Budget +7-12% for certified recycled materials (required for EU/California Q3 2026).
Final Insight: “The $1.50/unit threshold for premium cases is the new profitability benchmark in 2026. Procurement teams achieving sub-$1.40 landed cost consistently outperform competitors by 19% gross margin.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from 127 verified Shenzhen/Dongguan factories (Q4 2025 audit).
Next Step: Request our 2026 Factory Scorecard for pre-vetted case manufacturers with live capacity data.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Mobile Phone Case Wholesale in China
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing mobile phone cases from China remains a high-opportunity, high-risk endeavor. With over 8,000+ registered manufacturers and trading companies producing phone accessories in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces, distinguishing genuine factories from intermediaries and identifying operational reliability is critical. This report outlines a structured verification framework, differentiates factories from trading companies, and highlights red flags to mitigate supply chain risk in 2026.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope Verification | Confirm legal entity and manufacturing authorization | – Cross-check on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) – Verify scope includes “plastic product manufacturing” or “consumer electronics accessories” |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Validate production capacity, machinery, and quality control | – Schedule video call with live walk-through – Request time-stamped photos of production lines – Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for physical audit |
| 3 | Review Equipment List & Production Process | Assess technical capability for TPU, PC, silicone, or hybrid cases | – Request list of injection molding machines (e.g., Haitian, Toshiba) – Ask for cycle time per unit and mold changeover process |
| 4 | Evaluate In-House R&D and Design Capabilities | Confirm customization and innovation support | – Request sample of past custom designs – Ask about mold development lead time (should be 7–14 days for standard cases) |
| 5 | Audit Quality Control Procedures | Ensure consistent output and compliance | – Ask for QC checklist (e.g., drop test, color matching, fit test) – Verify AQL standards (preferably Level II, 2.5%) |
| 6 | Check Export History & Client References | Validate international experience and reliability | – Request 3–5 verifiable export clients (names, countries) – Contact references directly via LinkedIn or email |
| 7 | Request Sample with Full Documentation | Test product quality and packaging standards | – Evaluate material thickness, printing durability, button responsiveness – Confirm packaging includes batch number, manufacturing date |
How to Distinguish Between a Factory and a Trading Company
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Caution Advised) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing as core activity; may show factory address | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” as primary activity |
| Facility Footage | Shows injection molding machines, assembly lines, QC stations | Limited to showroom or office; no production equipment |
| Lead Time | Direct control: 15–25 days (including mold creation) | Longer lead times (25–40+ days) due to middleman coordination |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown: material, labor, mold, overhead | May lack detail; quotes often rounded or bundled |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Lower MOQs for in-stock designs (500–1,000 pcs); custom molds may require 2,000+ | Often higher MOQs (3,000–5,000+ pcs) to cover margins |
| Mold Ownership | Willing to transfer mold ownership post-payment | Retains mold; may charge reuse fees |
| Direct Communication | Engineers or production managers available for technical discussion | Only sales representatives; limited technical insight |
✅ Best Practice: Prioritize factories with in-house mold-making capabilities—this reduces dependency and accelerates prototyping.
Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a live factory video call | High likelihood of being a trading company or virtual seller | Disqualify unless third-party audit is provided |
| No physical address or factory photos | Potential scam or shell company | Verify via Google Earth or request GPS-tagged photos |
| Prices significantly below market average | Use of recycled/low-grade materials or hidden costs | Request material certification (e.g., RoHS, REACH) |
| Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement | Risk of design theft or unauthorized replication | Require legal agreement before sharing designs |
| No quality control documentation | Inconsistent product quality and compliance issues | Insist on AQL report and pre-shipment inspection |
| Payment required 100% upfront | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or L/C |
| Claims of “original design” with no patent or R&D evidence | Copycat products; potential IP infringement | Request design registration certificates or utility models |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools
-
Use platforms like SourcifyChina Verify™, Alibaba Trade Assurance, or Made-in-China.com Verified Supplier with on-site inspections.
-
Prioritize ESG-Compliant Factories
-
By 2026, EU and U.S. importers face stricter ESG reporting. Select manufacturers with:
- ISO 14001 (Environmental Management)
- ISO 45001 (Occupational Health & Safety)
- Carbon footprint disclosure
-
Diversify Supplier Base
-
Avoid over-reliance on a single factory. Maintain 2–3 pre-qualified suppliers in different regions (e.g., Shenzhen + Dongguan + Ningbo).
-
Invest in Mold Tooling Ownership
- Pay for molds upfront and secure ownership. This ensures long-term cost control and supply chain resilience.
Conclusion
In 2026, sourcing mobile phone cases from China demands a rigorous, data-driven verification process. Procurement managers must move beyond supplier claims and validate manufacturing authenticity, quality systems, and ethical practices. By distinguishing true factories from trading intermediaries and acting on red flags early, global buyers can secure reliable, scalable, and compliant supply chains.
For tailored supplier shortlisting and audit support, contact SourcifyChina Sourcing Solutions.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Enablement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Mobile Phone Case Procurement in China (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Authored by Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
The Critical Challenge: Time-to-Market in Mobile Phone Case Sourcing
Global procurement teams face unprecedented pressure to reduce lead times while ensuring quality compliance. Traditional supplier vetting for mobile phone case wholesale China consumes 200+ hours annually per procurement manager, with 68% of buyers encountering fraud, misaligned MOQs, or compliance failures (2025 Global Sourcing Survey).
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk & Waste
Our AI-verified supplier network undergoes rigorous 7-step validation, including onsite factory audits, export documentation checks, and real-time capacity analysis. Unlike open-market platforms, every Pro List supplier is pre-qualified for:
– Quality Compliance: ISO 9001, RoHS, REACH certification
– Scalability: Minimum 500K units/month capacity
– Ethical Operations: Validated labor/environmental audits
Time Savings Comparison: Traditional Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina Pro List
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Vetting | 42 hours | 0 hours (Pre-Verified) | 42 hours |
| Quality Assurance Validation | 28 hours | 8 hours (Audit Reports Provided) | 20 hours |
| MOQ/Negotiation Rounds | 19 hours | 4 hours (Pre-Negotiated Terms) | 15 hours |
| Compliance Documentation Review | 23 hours | 2 hours (Centralized Digital Vault) | 21 hours |
| TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS | 112 hours | 14 hours | 98 hours |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (Q1-Q4 2025), n=147 procurement teams sourcing mobile accessories.
Your Strategic Advantage in 2026
Procurement leaders using the Pro List achieve:
✅ 72-hour supplier shortlisting (vs. industry avg. 3-6 weeks)
✅ Zero factory fraud incidents in 2025 client engagements
✅ 15-22% lower landed costs through pre-qualified logistics partners
✅ Real-time production tracking via SourcifyChina’s OEM portal
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our iPhone case sourcing cycle from 87 to 11 days. We’ve redirected 180+ hours/year to strategic cost engineering.”
— Global Procurement Director, Fortune 500 Consumer Electronics Firm (2025 Client)
🔑 Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Reclaim 180+ hours annually while de-risking your mobile phone case supply chain. Our Pro List delivers immediate access to 37 pre-vetted manufacturers meeting Apple MFi, Samsung WPC, and EU Eco-Design standards – no more chasing unverified Alibaba leads or absorbing compliance penalties.
Take Your Next Step Before Q3 2026 Sourcing Cycles Close:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “Pro List Access – [Your Company Name]”
→ Receive 3 curated supplier matches + compliance dossier within 4 business hours.
2. WhatsApp +8615951276160 for urgent RFQs:
→ Get real-time factory availability and sample lead times in <15 minutes.
Why wait? 83% of 2025’s top-performing Pro List suppliers are already booked for 70%+ capacity in Q1 2026. Secure your priority access now to lock in 2026 production windows.
SourcifyChina: Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing since 2012. We don’t list suppliers—we verify them.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data confidential. Pro List access requires enterprise verification.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
