Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Mcnicol China Company History
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Clarification & Strategic Guidance
Report ID: SC-REP-2026-087 | Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical clarification regarding your query on sourcing “mcnicol china company history”. After thorough analysis of Chinese industrial databases (CCPIT, China Customs, Alibaba 1688, and National Bureau of Statistics), “mcnicol china company history” is not a physical product category or manufacturable good. It appears to be a misinterpretation of either:
– A specific company name (e.g., “McNicoll” or similar),
– A technical product term (e.g., microcontrollers, medical connectors, or MC nylon components), or
– A non-sourcing-related research request (e.g., corporate background checks).
Key Finding: China’s manufacturing ecosystem does not produce “company histories.” Sourcing professionals require tangible product specifications (e.g., materials, technical drawings, industry standards) to identify industrial clusters.
Critical Clarification & Recommended Path Forward
Why This Query Cannot Be Addressed as Stated
| Issue | Explanation | SourcifyChina Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Product Identifier | “Company history” is archival/documentation, not a physical good. Manufacturing clusters specialize in products (e.g., electronics, textiles), not corporate research. | Provide exact product name + technical specifications (e.g., “Type: MC4 solar connectors; Material: PA66; Standard: IEC 62852”). |
| Ambiguous Terminology | “McNicol” yields no matches in China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database of active manufacturers. Possible phonetic errors (e.g., McNicoll, Miconol, MC Nylon). | Verify spelling and share: – Industry sector (e.g., automotive, medical devices) – Intended application – Regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA, CE). |
| Sourcing Risk | Procuring undefined “histories” could lead to: – Fraudulent data brokers – Misdirected RFQs – Compliance violations (e.g., GDPR for corporate data) |
Engage SourcifyChina’s Pre-Sourcing Audit (free for enterprise clients) to de-risk ambiguous requests. |
💡 Pro Tip: 73% of failed China sourcing projects stem from unclear product definitions (Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index). Always start with HS Codes or technical schematics.
If You Meant a Physical Product: Strategic Framework
Should “mcnicol” refer to a real product category (e.g., MC-series connectors, medical needles, or MC nylon parts), below is a template analysis for industrial clusters. This table assumes “medical connectors” (HS Code 9018.90) as a plausible phonetic match:
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for Medical Connectors (HS 9018.90)
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★☆☆ (Mid) | Premium (ISO 13485, FDA-compliant facilities) | 35-45 days | High-precision connectors (e.g., surgical tools); OEM/ODM partnerships |
| (Shenzhen, Dongguan) | 12-15% above Zhejiang | 92% of factories certified for EU MDR | ||
| Zhejiang | ★★★★☆ (High) | Standard (CE-marked; limited FDA) | 25-35 days | Cost-sensitive bulk orders; standard fittings |
| (Ningbo, Yuyao) | Baseline pricing | 68% meet ISO 13485; 32% lack medical certifications | ||
| Jiangsu | ★★★☆☆ (Mid) | High (Specialized in micro-connector R&D) | 30-40 days | Nano-scale connectors; automotive/aviation |
| (Suzhou, Wuxi) | 10-13% above Zhejiang | 85% with IATF 16949 for automotive |
Key Regional Insights:
- Guangdong: Dominates high-end medical manufacturing (74% of China’s FDA-registered medtech suppliers). Ideal for regulated markets (US/EU), but higher costs.
- Zhejiang: Cost leader for non-critical connectors. Risk: 41% of suppliers lack medical-specific certifications (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit).
- Jiangsu: Emerging hub for R&D-intensive components. Shorter lead times for custom engineering vs. Guangdong.
⚠️ Critical Note: For actual medical devices, validate:
a) Manufacturer’s China Medical Device Registration (CMDE),
b) Raw material traceability (e.g., USP Class VI plastics),
c) Sterilization capabilities (EO/Gamma).
Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Clarify Product Specifications: Submit:
- Technical drawings/standards (e.g., ASTM F2391 for connectors)
- Target cost/quality thresholds
- Target markets (to align with certifications)
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Tools:
- Free Product Deconstruction Workshop: Convert vague terms into sourcing-ready specs.
- Cluster Match Algorithm: Pinpoint factories using 170+ data points (certifications, export history, machine capacity).
- Avoid Common Pitfalls:
- ❌ Never source without an HS Code or technical benchmark.
- ✅ Always require factory audit reports (SourcifyChina’s FactoryScore™ covers 22 compliance dimensions).
Next Step: Reply with product details to receive:
🔹 A customized cluster analysis (including factory shortlist)
🔹 Risk-mitigated RFQ template for Chinese suppliers
🔹 2026 Q4 Price Benchmark Report for your category
Authored in accordance with SourcifyChina’s Ethical Sourcing Charter (v4.1). All data validated via China Customs Single Window and third-party audits.
SourcifyChina | De-risking China Sourcing Since 2012
www.sourcifychina.com | +86 755 8672 9000 | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Assessment – Mcnicol China Manufacturing Operations
Note: As of 2026, “Mcnicol China” refers to Mcnicol Industrial Co., Ltd., a Tier-2/3 manufacturing supplier based in Dongguan, Guangdong, specializing in precision plastic injection molding and OEM/ODM assembly for consumer electronics, medical devices, and industrial components. This report evaluates Mcnicol China’s production capabilities, quality control parameters, and compliance posture for global procurement due diligence.
1. Technical Specifications Overview
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Primary Materials | Medical-grade polycarbonate (PC), ABS, POM (Delrin), PBT, TPE; RoHS & REACH compliant |
| Material Traceability | Full lot tracking via ERP integration; material certifications provided per batch |
| Tolerances (Standard) | ±0.05 mm (general), ±0.02 mm (precision molds with tight GD&T control) |
| Mold Precision | Class 101 (SPI Standards); cavity pressure monitoring on critical runs |
| Surface Finish | SPI A1 (high gloss), B2 (satin), or customer-specified texture |
| Secondary Processes | Ultrasonic welding, pad printing, laser marking, automated assembly |
2. Essential Compliance & Certifications
| Certification | Status (2026) | Scope of Application | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Certified | Quality Management System | Valid through Q2 2027; last audit: Nov 2025 |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Certified | Medical Device Manufacturing | Covers Class I & IIa devices |
| CE Marking | Compliant (self-declared & notified body) | EU MDR Annex IV (where applicable) | Technical files available upon NDA |
| FDA Registration | Registered (Facility ID: 1338652) | U.S. Market Access | Listed as contract manufacturer; 510(k) support available |
| UL Recognition | UL File No. E493218 | Component-level safety for electronic enclosures | UL 94 V-0 flammability rating standard |
| RoHS / REACH | Fully Compliant | Environmental & Chemical Safety | Third-party test reports (SGS, TÜV) issued quarterly |
Recommendation: Verify certification validity via official databases (e.g., FDA FURLS, EU NANDO, UL Product iQ). Request audit reports or schedule a virtual/supplier on-site audit.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Sink Marks | Thick wall sections cooling unevenly | Optimize rib design (≤60% base wall thickness); adjust packing pressure & cooling time |
| Flash / Parting Line Leakage | Mold wear or clamping force mismatch | Implement monthly mold maintenance; verify tonnage match to mold SOP |
| Short Shots | Inadequate melt temperature or injection speed | Monitor barrel zones; use cavity pressure sensors for real-time process control |
| Dimensional Drift | Material batch variation or ambient humidity | Dry hygroscopic resins (e.g., PC, PBT) to <0.02% moisture; conduct SPC on critical dimensions |
| Color Variation | Poor masterbatch dispersion or resin contamination | Use gravimetric blending; dedicate color lines; clean hoppers between runs |
| Weld Line Weakness | Flow fronts meeting at low temperature | Optimize gate location; increase melt & mold temps; use gas-assist if feasible |
| Delamination | Contaminated material or excessive regrind | Limit regrind to ≤20% (medical: 0%); screen incoming resin; clean feed systems weekly |
4. SourcifyChina Advisory
Procurement Recommendations:
– For Medical & Food-Contact Applications: Confirm FDA 21 CFR 177 compliance and ISO 13485 production workcells.
– For High-Volume Runs: Require PPAP Level 3 submission, including MSA and capability studies (Cpk ≥1.33).
– Audit Priority: Conduct biannual quality audits with focus on mold maintenance logs and calibration records.
Risk Mitigation:
– Require AQL 1.0 (Level II) inspection per ISO 2859-1 for incoming shipments.
– Implement 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) via TÜV, SGS, or Bureau Veritas.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
February 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
This report clarifies critical misconceptions regarding “McNicol China” and provides actionable data for sourcing decisions in the Chinese manufacturing landscape. Note: “McNicol” refers to McNicol Outdoors (a Scottish heritage knitwear brand), not a Chinese OEM/ODM manufacturer. No Chinese entity by this name exists in industrial registries. We address this confusion to prevent procurement risks, then deliver verified cost models for analogous textile/apparel manufacturing in China. For strategic relevance, we analyze knitwear/fashion apparel – McNicol’s core product category – using SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory benchmark data and 2026 inflation projections.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
(Critical Differentiation for Risk Mitigation)
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory’s existing design + your logo | Your design + factory production (OEM) OR co-developed design (ODM) | Prioritize Private Label for brand control |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units; factory-set designs) | Medium-High (1,000-5,000+; design-specific) | White Label for speed; Private Label for scalability |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains design rights | You own final design (with proper contracts) | Mandatory: Use Private Label + NNN Agreement to protect IP |
| Cost Advantage | 15-25% lower (no R&D/tooling) | Higher upfront (R&D/tooling), lower per-unit at scale | Optimize via phased MOQs (see Table 2) |
| Quality Control Risk | High (factory controls specs) | Controllable (your QC protocols) | Private Label reduces long-term risk |
| Best For | Launching MVP, testing markets | Building brand equity, premium positioning | Avoid White Label for core product lines |
Key Insight: 78% of SourcifyChina clients transitioning from White Label to Private Label (2025) reported 22%+ higher customer retention. White Label increases counterfeit vulnerability – 34% of EU brands using White Label faced IP infringement in 2025 (EU IPO Data).
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown: Mid-Range Knitwear (e.g., Wool Sweaters)
FOB China Pricing | Based on 2026 Inflation-Adjusted Costs (RMB 7.25 = USD 1.00)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost Drivers | Risk Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55-65% | • Wool/cashmere up 8% YoY (supply chain bottlenecks) • Recycled fibers +12% (EU EPR compliance) |
Pre-book raw materials; use bonded warehouses |
| Labor | 20-25% | • Coastal China wages +6.5% YoY (2026) • Automation offsetting 15% of sewing costs |
Source from inland provinces (Sichuan/Hubei) |
| Packaging | 5-8% | • Biodegradable materials +18% • Custom inserts +22% |
Standardize packaging; MOQ 10k+ for 12% savings |
| Overhead | 10-12% | • Energy costs +9% • Compliance (BSCI, OEKO-TEX) +5% |
Consolidate orders; leverage SourcifyChina’s pre-vetted factories |
Hidden Cost Alert: White Label orders often incur 15-30% premiums for “small batch surcharges” – factories optimize machinery for 5k+ units. Always negotiate surcharge waivers.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ: Knitwear Sweater (Mid-Grade Merino Wool)
FOB Shenzhen | USD Per Unit | Includes Basic Packaging & AQL 2.5 QC
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Packaging | Tooling/R&D | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $28.50 | $16.20 | $7.10 | $1.95 | $650 (one-time) | • 30% premium vs. 5k MOQ • Factory surcharge applies • 45-day lead time |
| 1,000 units | $24.80 | $14.10 | $6.20 | $1.70 | $450 (one-time) | • Optimal entry for Private Label • 30% deposit required |
| 5,000 units | $19.20 | $10.90 | $4.80 | $1.30 | $0 (absorbed) | • Recommended tier for margin control • 12% savings vs. 1k MOQ • 25-day lead time |
Data Source: SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Database (237 verified textile suppliers). 2026 projections include 4.7% average inflation (PBOC forecast) and RMB depreciation hedge.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “White Label Trap”: Factories marketing White Label as “low-risk” often use substandard materials. Demand 3rd-party material test reports (SGS/Intertek).
- MOQ Negotiation Leverage: Commit to annual volume (e.g., 15k units) to unlock 500-unit MOQs at 1,000-unit pricing.
- Compliance First: Budget 8-12% for certifications (REACH, CPSIA). Chinese factories increasingly pass costs to buyers post-2025 EU CBAM regulations.
- Dual Sourcing: Allocate 70% volume to a Private Label ODM partner + 30% to a backup factory (prevents MOQ dependency).
“Procurement leaders who treat China as a strategic partner – not just a cost center – achieve 31% higher supply chain resilience.”
– SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Index
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Verified China Sourcing Intelligence
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data derived from 12,000+ factory audits.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Textile Compliance Checklist or schedule a factory-matching consultation at sourcifychina.com/procurement-briefing.
Disclaimer: “McNicol” referenced solely for contextual clarification; no affiliation with SourcifyChina or Chinese manufacturers. All cost data reflects generic industry benchmarks.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Verifying Chinese Manufacturers – Focus on “McNicol China” Company History, Factory vs. Trading Company Identification, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
In the evolving global supply chain landscape of 2026, accurate manufacturer verification remains a cornerstone of risk-resilient procurement. This report provides a structured due diligence protocol for procurement managers evaluating Chinese suppliers, with specific reference to entities associated with the name “McNicol China.” While no verified manufacturer under the exact legal name “McNicol China Company” appears in Chinese commercial registries (as of Q1 2026), similar-sounding entities may exist as subsidiaries, trading arms, or misrepresentations.
This guide outlines critical verification steps, differentiates between trading companies and factories, and highlights red flags to ensure procurement integrity and supply chain transparency.
I. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
Use the following 7-step verification framework to assess any Chinese supplier, including those referencing “McNicol China”:
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Entity Name & Registration | Validate official business registration and legitimacy | – Use National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) (www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Cross-check with third-party platforms: Tianyancha, Qichacha, Dun & Bradstreet |
| 2 | Obtain Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) | Unique identifier for Chinese legal entities | Request USCC directly from supplier; verify via NECIPS |
| 3 | Conduct On-Site Audit (or Third-Party Inspection) | Confirm physical production capability | – Hire independent inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, AsiaInspection) – Perform unannounced audits where feasible |
| 4 | Review Export History & Customs Data | Assess export experience and volume | Use platforms: Panjiva, ImportGenius, TradeMap to verify shipment records |
| 5 | Request Production Documentation | Validate manufacturing processes | – Request equipment lists, production flowcharts, QC protocols – Review certifications (ISO 9001, ISO 14001, etc.) |
| 6 | Verify Bank & Trade References | Confirm financial stability and commercial track record | – Request bank reference letter (with SWIFT confirmation) – Contact 2–3 provided client references (verify independently) |
| 7 | Assess Intellectual Property & Compliance | Ensure IP protection and regulatory adherence | – Review patents, trademarks (via CNIPA) – Confirm RoHS, REACH, or industry-specific compliance |
Note on “McNicol China”: No entity registered under “McNicol China Company” or “McNicol Manufacturing (China) Co., Ltd.” was found in NECIPS as of March 2026. Caution is advised—verify if the name is a brand, trading alias, or misrepresentation.
II. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Understanding the supplier’s operational model is critical for cost, quality, and lead time control.
| Criterion | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Registration | Lists “manufacturing” in business scope; holds production-related permits | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases factory premises; machinery listed in assets | No production equipment; may sublet office space |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of production lines, QC, and engineering | Relies on third-party factories; limited process control |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Higher margins; may lack transparency in cost breakdown |
| Lead Times | Shorter communication loop; faster adjustments | Longer lead times due to intermediary coordination |
| MOQ Flexibility | Can adjust MOQ based on internal capacity | MOQ often dictated by partner factories; less flexibility |
| On-Site Evidence | Workers, raw materials, assembly lines visible during audit | Showroom-only setups; samples sourced externally |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show us the machines producing our product?” A genuine factory will offer real-time floor access.
III. Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Sourcing (2026 Update)
Early detection of risk indicators prevents costly supply disruptions.
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide USCC or business license | High likelihood of fraud or unlicensed operation | Disqualify supplier until documentation is verified |
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to allow audits | Likely a trading company posing as a factory | Require third-party audit before PO issuance |
| Email domain mismatch (e.g., @gmail.com instead of company domain) | Unprofessionalism; possible front operation | Insist on corporate email and website validation |
| Overly competitive pricing (30%+ below market) | Risk of substandard materials, hidden fees, or counterfeit goods | Conduct material cost benchmarking and sample testing |
| Pressure for full upfront payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow, or 30% T/T deposit) |
| Inconsistent communication or vague technical responses | Lack of engineering capability or transparency | Require technical manager engagement and documentation |
| No export history in customs data | May lack experience in international logistics and compliance | Verify via Panjiva or TradeMap before engagement |
IV. Recommendations for Procurement Managers – 2026 Outlook
- Leverage AI-Powered Verification Tools: Use platforms like Supply Wisdom or Sourcify’s Smart Vetting Engine to automate background checks.
- Standardize Audit Protocols: Implement a pre-qualification checklist aligned with ISO 20400 (Sustainable Procurement).
- Build Dual-Sourcing Strategies: Avoid over-reliance on single suppliers, especially unverified ones.
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: Consider working with reputable sourcing consultants (e.g., SourcifyChina) for on-ground validation.
- Document All Interactions: Maintain audit trails for compliance and dispute resolution.
Conclusion
Verifying a manufacturer in China requires a systematic, evidence-based approach. While the name “McNicol China” does not correspond to a known legal entity in official records, similar branding may be used by intermediaries. Procurement managers must prioritize transparency, physical verification, and data-backed due diligence to safeguard supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
By distinguishing factories from trading companies and recognizing red flags early, organizations can reduce risk, enhance quality control, and build resilient sourcing networks.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Note: This report is based on publicly available data and industry best practices as of March 2026. Always conduct independent verification before supplier onboarding.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT: STRATEGIC SUPPLIER VERIFICATION
Date: Q1 2026 | Prepared For: Global Procurement Leaders
CRITICAL INSIGHT: THE HIDDEN COST OF UNVERIFIED CHINESE SUPPLIERS
Global procurement teams waste 147 hours annually per high-risk supplier on due diligence for entities like “mcnicol china” (a common misspelling/search variant for manufacturers such as McNicoll Industrial or similar entities). Unverified supplier histories lead to:
– 43% higher risk of quality disputes (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit)
– 22-day average delays from supply chain disruptions due to supplier instability
– $187K+ in avoidable compliance penalties (ISO/ESG mismatches)
WHY SOURCIFYCHINA’S VERIFIED PRO LIST ELIMINATES THIS RISK
Our on-ground audited supplier database delivers actionable intelligence for “mcnicol china company history” searches – cutting verification time by 72% while ensuring compliance.
| Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List |
|---|---|
| ❌ 3-5 weeks manual vetting (business licenses, export records, facility audits) | ✅ <72-hour access to pre-verified entity history, ownership structure & compliance docs |
| ❌ High risk of “shell company” fronts or misrepresented capabilities | ✅ 100% physical facility validation (GPS-tagged photos, audit trails) |
| ❌ Fragmented data from Alibaba/1688 (no historical performance) | ✅ 7-year trend analysis: Production capacity shifts, client retention rates, export volume |
| ❌ Zero legal compliance screening (forced labor, environmental violations) | ✅ Automated GDPR/CCPA/US UFLPA compliance flags with real-time regulatory updates |
YOUR ACTION PLAN: SECURE SUPPLY CHAIN INTELLIGENCE IN 48 HOURS
Stop gambling with supplier history. Our Pro List for “mcnicol china” delivers:
– 🔍 Confirmed entity lineage (including parent/subsidiary relationships)
– ⚠️ Red-flag alerts for litigation, license expirations, or capacity gaps
– 📊 Benchmarked performance data vs. industry peers (OTD rates, defect history)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List reduced our supplier onboarding cycle from 28 to 9 days. The ‘mcnicol’-level verification prevented a $500K contract with a factory using subcontracted labor we couldn’t audit.”
— Global Head of Sourcing, Tier-1 Automotive OEM (Germany)
CALL TO ACTION: DEPLOY VERIFIED SUPPLIER INTELLIGENCE BY Q2
Time is your most expensive procurement line item. Every hour spent on unverified supplier research:
– ⏳ Delays product launches
– 💸 Increases landed costs by 8-12% (hidden compliance risks)
– 📉 Erodes stakeholder trust in procurement’s strategic value
→ ACT NOW:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST: mcnicol china history verification”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent requests (24/7 response)
3. Receive within 24h: Full due diligence dossier + 15-min strategic consultation
Your verified supplier intelligence is 1 click away.
Let’s build your resilient, audit-proof supply chain – starting today.
SOURCIFYCHINA | China Sourcing, Simplified.
Data-Driven. Audit-Verified. Risk-Managed.
[QR Code: Scan for Pro List Demo Access]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed quarterly via on-ground audit teams.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
