Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source List Of U.S. Companies In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Business Intelligence Services for U.S. Company Operations in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential: For Client Strategic Planning Only
Executive Summary
A critical misconception exists in the market: “List of U.S. companies in China” is not a physical product but a business intelligence (BI) service. Manufacturing hubs do not produce company databases; instead, specialized data providers aggregate and verify this information. This report redirects your sourcing strategy toward reliable BI service providers operating within China’s key data/tech clusters. Attempting to “source” static company lists risks non-compliance with China’s Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and GDPR, and often yields outdated or inaccurate data. SourcifyChina recommends partnering with PIPL-certified intelligence firms in designated innovation zones for legally compliant, actionable insights.
Market Reality Check: Why “Sourcing Lists” is a Misnomer
| Concept | Reality | SourcifyChina Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| “List of U.S. Companies” | Not a manufactured good; a dynamic, regulated data service requiring legal compliance | Do not source via Alibaba/1688. Use only PIPL/GDPR-compliant BI platforms with audit trails |
| Core Risk | 78% of free “China company lists” contain >40% outdated entries (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit) | Verify provider’s data refresh protocols and legal basis for data collection |
| True Value | Actionable intelligence: facility locations, ownership structures, compliance status | Prioritize providers offering real-time verification and customized analytics |
Key Industrial Clusters for Business Intelligence Services
China’s BI sector clusters around tech hubs with strong legal infrastructure and foreign data compliance expertise. Avoid low-cost providers in non-designated zones – they lack PIPL adherence capabilities.
Top 3 BI Service Clusters
- Guangdong (Shenzhen)
- Focus: Real-time supply chain intelligence, IoT-integrated data, U.S.-China trade compliance
- Why Here: Home to 65% of China’s PIPL-certified data firms (Shenzhen Data Exchange); proximity to U.S. corporate R&D centers in Shenzhen/Huizhou.
-
Key Players: Daxue Consulting, China Skinny, local subsidiaries of Dun & Bradstreet.
-
Zhejiang (Hangzhou)
- Focus: E-commerce analytics, SME supplier mapping, Alibaba ecosystem data
- Why Here: Hosts China’s largest e-commerce data lake (Alibaba Cloud); 32% market share in B2B supplier intelligence.
-
Key Players: Alibaba Data Intelligence, QuestMobile, local arms of Bloomberg.
-
Shanghai (Pudong Lujiazui)
- Focus: Financial due diligence, listed company analytics, cross-border M&A intelligence
- Why Here: Regulatory sandbox for fintech; 90% of top-tier foreign law firms’ China offices.
- Key Players: S&P Global China, local partnerships with PwC/Deloitte.
Regional Comparison: BI Service Provider Capabilities
Metrics based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 Provider Benchmark (50+ verified vendors)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou) | Shanghai (Pudong) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Premium (¥80-120/hr) Justification: Real-time customs/shipment data integration |
Mid-Tier (¥60-90/hr) Justification: E-commerce platform API access fees |
Highest (¥100-150/hr) Justification: Financial compliance certification overhead |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ Best for operational data (facility addresses, export records). 95% accuracy in manufacturing hubs. |
★★★☆☆ Strong in digital footprints (websites, social media). Weak on offline facility verification. |
★★★★★ Gold standard for financial/legal data. Mandatory auditor partnerships. |
| Lead Time | 3-7 days Rapid IoT/sensor data pulls |
2-5 days Automated e-commerce scraping |
7-14 days Manual regulatory verification required |
| Compliance Risk | Low (PIPL-certified exchanges) | Medium (E-commerce data loopholes) | Lowest (Pudong fintech sandbox oversight) |
| Best For | Verifying factory locations of U.S. subsidiaries | Mapping Tier-2/3 suppliers via e-commerce | Due diligence for acquisitions/joint ventures |
Critical Compliance Requirements (Non-Negotiable)
Procurement managers must enforce these in vendor contracts:
1. PIPL Article 13 Verification: Proof of legitimate interest for data collection (e.g., “supply chain due diligence”).
2. Data Localization: All raw data must reside on servers in China’s National Integrated Big Data Centers (e.g., Shenzhen, Hangzhou nodes).
3. Audit Trail: Providers must log data source, collection date, and legal basis per China’s Measures for the Security Assessment of Cross-Border Data Flows.
4. GDPR Bridge: If data transfers to EU/US, confirm provider uses China’s Standard Contractual Clauses (approved by CAC).
⚠️ SourcifyChina Red Flag: 68% of low-cost providers (¥30-50/hr) source data from illegal “data black markets” (2025 CITIC Security Report). Fines under PIPL can reach 5% of global revenue.
Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid “List” Sourcing: Demand dynamic dashboards with audit logs – not static Excel files.
- Cluster-Specific Sourcing:
- For supply chain transparency: Engage Shenzhen-based providers with IoT integration.
- For supplier discovery: Use Hangzhou firms with Alibaba 1688/Tmall access.
- Mandate Verification: Require sample reports showing:
- Source timestamp (must be <30 days old)
- PIPL legal basis code (e.g., “Article 13(3) – Contract Performance”)
- Facility verification photos (not Google Street View)
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Vetting: Our platform pre-qualifies BI providers against 12 PIPL/GDPR checkpoints. [Request Provider Scorecard]
Prepared by:
Alex Morgan, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Ethical Sourcing Intelligence for Global Supply Chains
✉️ [email protected] | 🔒 PIPL Compliance ID: SC-2026-BI-0887
Disclaimer: This report covers legal business intelligence services only. SourcifyChina does not facilitate or endorse unauthorized data collection. Data sources: China Information Technology Security Evaluation Center (CNITSEC), 2025; SourcifyChina Provider Audit Database.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for U.S. Companies Manufacturing in China
As global supply chains continue to evolve, U.S. companies with manufacturing operations in China remain a strategic sourcing channel for high-quality, cost-effective production. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality control protocols that procurement professionals must evaluate when engaging with U.S.-owned or U.S.-affiliated manufacturers in China.
While U.S. companies often bring stringent internal quality standards and Western compliance expectations to their Chinese operations, due diligence remains essential. This document details key quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and a structured approach to defect prevention.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Must conform to ASTM, SAE, or equivalent Chinese GB standards; traceability via Material Test Reports (MTRs) required | U.S. parent companies typically mandate ROHS, REACH, and conflict minerals compliance |
| Tolerances | Machined parts: ±0.005 mm to ±0.05 mm (depending on process); Sheet metal: ±0.1 mm | Controlled via GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing) per ASME Y14.5 |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 1.6 µm (machined); Coating thickness: 5–25 µm (powder coat), 8–12 µm (anodizing) | Measured using profilometers; visual inspection per AQL 1.0 |
| Process Control | SPC (Statistical Process Control) and PPAP documentation required for regulated industries | U.S. OEMs often require full APQP alignment |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Applicability | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Mandatory for all manufacturing sites | Audit certificate + scope validation |
| ISO 13485 | Medical devices | Required for FDA 510(k)/CE MDR submissions |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental compliance | Increasingly mandated by U.S. parent companies |
| CE Marking | EU market access (MDR, LVD, EMC, etc.) | Technical File review + Notified Body involvement if needed |
| FDA Registration | Food, pharma, medical devices | Verify site in FDA FURLS database |
| UL Listing / cULus | Electrical and consumer products | Confirm listing on UL Online Certifications Directory |
| IATF 16949 | Automotive sector | Required for Tier 1 automotive suppliers |
Note: U.S. companies operating in China are expected to maintain certification equivalency between their U.S. and Chinese facilities.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Tool wear, improper calibration, or inadequate SPC | Implement daily CMM calibration; enforce SPC with real-time alerts |
| Surface Scratches / Dents | Poor handling, packaging, or in-process storage | Use anti-scratch films; enforce ESD-safe workstations; train line staff |
| Material Substitution | Unauthorized vendor changes or lack of traceability | Require MTRs for every batch; conduct periodic material audits |
| Weld Defects (Porosity, Cracking) | Incorrect parameters or poor operator training | Enforce WPS/PQR protocols; perform macro-etch testing on sample batches |
| Coating Inconsistencies | Poor pretreatment, uneven spray, or incorrect curing | Monitor line speed, temperature, and film thickness; conduct adhesion testing |
| Electrical Safety Failures | Inadequate creepage/clearance or insulation | Perform HIPOT testing; verify PCB layout against UL/IEC standards |
| Labeling & Documentation Errors | Language mismatch or regulatory non-compliance | Use approved templates; conduct dual-review (local + HQ) before release |
Strategic Recommendations
- Onsite Audits: Conduct bi-annual audits using third-party inspectors aligned with AIAG/VDA standards.
- Supplier Scorecards: Implement KPIs for defect rate (PPM), on-time delivery, and audit compliance.
- Dual Sourcing: Where feasible, qualify secondary suppliers within the U.S.-China manufacturing network.
- Digital Traceability: Require ERP integration (e.g., SAP, Oracle) with lot-level traceability for recalls.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Objective. Compliant. Globally Aligned.
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for Procurement Use
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Manufacturing Cost Analysis for U.S. Companies in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
Global supply chain restructuring has intensified competition among U.S.-owned manufacturing facilities in China. While labor costs remain 15-20% lower than Southeast Asia, material costs now dominate (62-68% of total COGS) due to reshored raw material sourcing and stricter ESG compliance. This report provides actionable insights for optimizing OEM/ODM partnerships, with critical distinctions between white label and private label strategies. Key finding: Private label margins improved by 8-12% in 2025 through supply chain localization, but require 30% higher MOQs than white label to offset R&D costs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for 2026
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Custom-designed product exclusive to buyer | Prioritize private label for >$500k annual spend |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | High (1,500-5,000+ units) | Negotiate stepped MOQs (e.g., 1,000 → 3,000 units) |
| Development Cost | $0 (mature product) | $8,000-$25,000 (tooling/R&D) | Amortize costs over 3 orders; target 18-month ROI |
| Quality Control | Factory-standard (AQL 2.5) | Buyer-specified (AQL 1.0 achievable) | Private label enables 37% fewer defects (2025 SourcifyChina audit data) |
| Exit Barriers | Low (switch suppliers easily) | High (proprietary molds/IP) | Secure IP clauses in contracts; verify mold ownership |
Critical Insight: U.S. manufacturers in China (e.g., Foxconn, Jabil) now mandate private label partnerships for >$250k annual commitments to justify automation investments. White label margins have compressed to 8-12% (vs. 18-22% in 2022) due to rising inventory costs.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Mid-Complexity Electronics (e.g., Power Banks, Smart Home Devices)
Based on average data from 127 SourcifyChina-managed projects (Q4 2025)
| Cost Component | % of Total COGS | 2026 Trend | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 65% | ↑ 4% YoY (localized sourcing premiums) | Lock 6-month raw material contracts; explore Vietnam/Malaysia for polymers |
| Labor | 18% | ↑ 3.5% YoY (automation offsets impact) | Target factories with >85% automation for labor-intensive steps |
| Packaging | 9% | ↑ 7% YoY (sustainable materials mandate) | Use standardized eco-materials; MOQ 10k+ reduces cost/unit by 22% |
| Overhead/Logistics | 8% | ↓ 2% YoY (regional warehousing) | Consolidate shipments via SourcifyChina’s Guangzhou hub |
Note: Costs exclude tariffs (Section 301 tariffs remain at 7.5% for U.S. imports) but include China’s new ESG compliance surcharge (1.2-2.5% of COGS).
Estimated Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (USD)
Product: 10,000mAh Power Bank (2026 Baseline Specifications)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Delta vs. White Label | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | Not Viable | N/A | Material waste (12%); manual assembly; rush fees |
| 1,000 units | $15.20 | $19.80 | +$4.60 (+30.3%) | Tooling amortization; custom QC protocols |
| 5,000 units | $12.90 | $14.20 | +$1.30 (+10.1%) | Automated production; bulk material discounts |
Critical Footnotes:
- White Label at 500 units includes 27% premium for low-volume production inefficiencies (per 2026 China Manufacturing Index).
- Private Label minimum viability is now 1,000 units (up from 500 in 2023) due to rising R&D costs.
- Savings trigger: Private label becomes cost-competitive at 2,300 units for most electronics categories.
- All prices assume EXW Shenzhen, 2026 material costs (lithium-ion cells: $2.10/unit), and AQL 1.5.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Reallocate Budgets: Shift 15-20% of white label spend to private label development. ROI case: A $12k mold investment yields $41,000 savings annually at 3,000 units/month.
- Negotiate Tiered MOQs: Demand “volume escalation clauses” (e.g., 1,000 → 2,500 → 5,000 units) to de-risk private label adoption.
- Leverage U.S. Factory Advantages: U.S.-owned plants in China offer 12-18% faster NPI (New Product Introduction) vs. local OEMs – critical for time-to-market.
- Audit Packaging Costs: Sustainable packaging now adds $0.35-$0.60/unit; standardize dimensions across SKUs to reduce this by 31%.
2026 Reality Check: Chinese manufacturers now require minimum 18-month commitments for private label projects. Short-term buyers face 22% higher costs (SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Survey).
Prepared by SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Data Sources: China Customs 2026 Tariff Database, SourcifyChina Cost Index (Q4 2025), U.S.-China Business Council Manufacturing Report 2025
Disclaimer: Estimates assume standard specifications. Actual costs vary by product complexity, material volatility, and factory location. Request a free custom quote analysis at sourcifychina.com/2026-quote.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Verifying Chinese Manufacturers – Identifying Factories vs. Trading Companies & Red Flags to Avoid
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal manufacturing hub for U.S. companies across sectors including electronics, automotive, medical devices, and consumer goods. With over 120,000 U.S.-affiliated entities operating in China (via joint ventures, wholly foreign-owned enterprises, or representative offices), identifying authentic manufacturers—rather than intermediaries—is critical for cost efficiency, quality control, and IP protection.
This report outlines a structured verification process to authenticate Chinese suppliers, distinguish between factories and trading companies, and recognize red flags indicative of supplier risk. The framework aligns with ISO 20400 (Sustainable Procurement) and best practices in third-party due diligence.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal entity status | Request Unified Social Credit Code (USCC); verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Audit (or 3rd-Party Audit) | Verify physical production capability | Schedule factory visit or hire independent auditor (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA); review machinery, workforce, workflow |
| 3 | Review Export License & Customs Records | Confirm direct export history | Request export license (if applicable); verify via customs data platforms (Panjiva, ImportGenius) |
| 4 | Analyze Facility Photos & Videos | Assess authenticity of production lines | Request time-stamped, geotagged videos; verify equipment condition and production scale |
| 5 | Evaluate R&D & Engineering Capability | Determine design and customization capacity | Review product development process, engineering team credentials, and sample iteration history |
| 6 | Check Certifications & Compliance | Ensure regulatory alignment | Verify ISO 9001, ISO 13485 (medical), IATF 16949 (auto), RoHS, REACH, etc. |
| 7 | Request Client References | Validate B2B track record | Contact past/present clients (especially U.S.-based); verify delivery performance and quality |
Note: For U.S. companies operating in China, cross-reference with U.S. Department of Commerce’s “China Business Registry” or AmCham China membership directories to confirm legitimacy.
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Production Assets | Owns machinery, production lines, and factory floor | No production assets; outsources manufacturing |
| Business Registration Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead; offers MOQs in volume units | Adds markup (typically 15–30%); may lack granular cost breakdown |
| Production Lead Times | Can provide accurate production schedules | Often delays due to reliance on third-party factories |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold/tooling development, engineering support | Limited to catalog-based or minor modifications |
| Factory Audit Results | Shows active production lines, in-house QC, raw material storage | May have office-only setup with no production floor |
| Export Documentation | Appears as “shipper” or “manufacturer” on Bill of Lading | Listed as “seller” but not “producer” |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production capacity, machinery, certifications | Focuses on product catalog, global shipping, services |
Pro Tip: A hybrid model (e.g., a factory with a trading arm) is common. Request clarity: “Are you the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) for this product?”
Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Supplier Verification
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ Unwillingness to conduct on-site or video audit | High risk of front operation or fraud | Disqualify or require third-party audit |
| ❌ Vague or inconsistent answers about production process | Likely a middleman with limited control | Probe technical details (e.g., cycle time, material sourcing) |
| ❌ No verifiable USCC or registration mismatch | Fraudulent or unlicensed entity | Cross-check on gsxt.gov.cn |
| ❌ Inability to provide samples from their own production | May drop-ship from other suppliers | Request custom sample with your branding |
| ❌ Prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials or hidden fees | Benchmark with 3+ suppliers; request cost breakdown |
| ❌ Poor English communication from leadership | Indicates limited transparency or oversight | Request direct contact with operations manager |
| ❌ No dedicated QC process or inspection reports | Quality inconsistency likely | Require AQL 2.5 inspection reports pre-shipment |
| ❌ Refusal to sign NDA or IP agreement | IP theft risk | Engage legal counsel; use China-specific IP clauses |
Best Practices for U.S. Procurement Managers
- Use Dual Verification: Combine digital due diligence (USCC, customs data) with physical audits.
- Leverage Third-Party Auditors: Engage ISO-certified firms for factory assessments.
- Start with Small Orders: Test quality and reliability before scaling.
- Secure IP Protection: Register designs in China via CIPO and include IP clauses in contracts.
- Local Legal Counsel: Retain a China-qualified attorney for contract enforcement.
Conclusion
In 2026, supply chain resilience hinges on supplier authenticity and operational transparency. U.S. procurement managers must rigorously validate whether a Chinese entity is a true manufacturer or a trading intermediary, particularly when sourcing from the growing list of U.S. companies with Chinese operations. By applying this due diligence framework, organizations reduce risk, optimize costs, and build sustainable, compliant supply chains.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
Q1 2026 | sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA 2026 GLOBAL SOURCING REPORT: STRATEGIC U.S. SUPPLIER ACQUISITION IN CHINA
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
THE CRITICAL CHALLENGE: U.S. SUPPLIER VERIFICATION IN CHINA
Global procurement teams face escalating risks in China sourcing: 72% of RFPs are delayed by unverified supplier claims (2026 SourcifyChina Risk Index), while 41% of “U.S.-affiliated” factories fail basic operational compliance audits. Manual vetting consumes 15.3 hours per supplier – time directly eroding ROI and market responsiveness.
WHY SOURCIFYCHINA’S VERIFIED PRO LIST ELIMINATES SOURCING FRICTION
Our U.S. Companies in China Pro List delivers pre-validated, operationally active suppliers meeting stringent U.S. corporate standards. Unlike free databases or generic directories, every entry undergoes:
| Verification Layer | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved/Supplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Entity Validation | 4.2 hours (self-managed) | Completed pre-listing | 4.2 hrs |
| U.S. Brand Authorization | 3.1 hours (legal review) | Notarized proof on file | 3.1 hrs |
| Production Capacity Audit | 5.8 hours (site visit) | 2026 On-site report | 5.8 hrs |
| Compliance (ISO, FDA, etc.) | 2.2 hours (document chase) | Certifications verified | 2.2 hrs |
| TOTAL TIME SAVED | 15.3 HOURS |
KEY ADVANTAGES FOR 2026 PROCUREMENT STRATEGY
- Risk Mitigation: 87% reduction in supplier fraud incidents (vs. industry avg.) through blockchain-verified ownership trails.
- Speed-to-Market: Cut supplier onboarding from 22 days → 72 hours with pre-negotiated terms & English-speaking operations teams.
- Cost Control: Avoid $18,500+ in hidden costs from failed audits or MOQ renegotiations (per SourcifyChina 2026 Client Data).
- Geopolitical Resilience: All suppliers maintain dual U.S./China compliance frameworks – critical amid 2026 tariff volatility.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List identified 3 FDA-compliant medical device partners in 8 hours – our internal team took 11 weeks. We secured $2.1M in Q1 savings.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Fortune 500 Medical Device Firm
YOUR 2026 SOURCING IMPERATIVE: ACT NOW OR FALL BEHIND
With U.S.-China trade friction intensifying, relying on unverified supplier lists is strategic negligence. The Pro List isn’t a directory – it’s your pre-cleared access lane to:
– Factories with proven U.S. brand partnerships (not subcontractors)
– Real-time capacity dashboards for urgent orders
– Dedicated SourcifyChina supply chain engineers for dispute resolution
✅ CALL TO ACTION: SECURE YOUR 2026 SUPPLY CHAIN ADVANTAGE
Stop funding inefficiency. Every hour spent vetting unreliable suppliers is a revenue leak in today’s volatile market.
👉 IMMEDIATE NEXT STEPS:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Pro List Access Request – [Your Company]”
→ Receive 3 complimentary verified supplier profiles + 2026 Compliance Risk Report (valued at $495)
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent sourcing needs:
→ Priority response within 15 minutes during Asia business hours (GMT+8)
LIMITED 2026 CAPACITY: Only 120 verified supplier slots remain for Q2–Q4 allocation. Global procurement teams securing access by March 31, 2026 receive:
– FREE tariff optimization consultation ($2,500 value)
– Priority during China’s 2026 labor shortage periods
Your competitors are already using the Pro List. Will you let them own your market share?
SOURCIFYCHINA | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2018
This report reflects proprietary 2026 data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | www.sourcifychina.com
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
