Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source List Of Us Companies Doing Business In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Title: Strategic Market Analysis: Sourcing U.S. Companies Operating in China – Industrial Clusters & Regional Competitiveness
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for global procurement professionals seeking to engage with or source through U.S. companies operating in China. While the phrase “list of U.S. companies doing business in China” refers to a directory of firms, the strategic value lies in understanding where these companies establish manufacturing, joint ventures, or supply chain operations within China. This intelligence enables procurement managers to identify high-capacity, quality-assured production ecosystems backed by Western governance and compliance standards.
U.S. corporations in China are concentrated in advanced manufacturing and high-value industrial sectors, including electronics, automotive, medical devices, industrial equipment, and consumer goods. Their operational footprint is not uniform but clustered in regions offering infrastructure, skilled labor, policy incentives, and proximity to supply chain ecosystems.
This report identifies key industrial clusters hosting U.S. manufacturing and commercial operations and evaluates regional competitiveness across price, quality, and lead time—critical KPIs for global sourcing decisions.
Key U.S. Industrial Clusters in China (by Province & City)
The following provinces and cities are home to the highest concentration of U.S. manufacturing and commercial operations in China, based on U.S. Department of Commerce data, enterprise registrations, and industrial zone disclosures:
| Province | Key Cities | Dominant U.S. Industries | Notable U.S. Companies (Examples) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | Electronics, Telecom, Consumer Tech | Apple (supply chain partners), Tesla (Gigafactory via suppliers), HP, Amazon (logistics & cloud hardware) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | Semiconductors, Automotive, Industrial Equipment | Honeywell, Johnson Controls, Corning, 3M |
| Shanghai & Surrounding | Shanghai, Kunshan, Jiading | Automotive, MedTech, Aerospace, R&D | General Motors, Tesla, Johnson & Johnson, GE Healthcare, Boeing (component suppliers) |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu | Light Industrial, E-commerce Logistics, Smart Hardware | Nike (contract manufacturing), Amazon (logistics partners), Dell (supply chain) |
| Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (Jing-Jin-Ji) | Beijing, Tianjin | R&D, Biotech, High-Tech Services | Pfizer, Merck, Cisco, IBM |
| Sichuan & Chongqing | Chengdu, Chongqing | Automotive, Aerospace, Electronics | Cummins, Eaton, Carrier, Honeywell |
Note: U.S. companies typically do not “manufacture directly” under their own name in China but operate through wholly foreign-owned enterprises (WFOEs), joint ventures (JVs), or contract with Tier 1 suppliers located in these clusters. Procurement managers should target suppliers within these ecosystems to benefit from U.S. standards in quality control, ESG compliance, and traceability.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions in China
The table below evaluates major industrial provinces hosting U.S. operations based on three core sourcing parameters: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1–5 (5 = most favorable).
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Lead Time Efficiency | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen/Guangzhou) | 3.5 | 4.8 | 4.5 | Proximity to Hong Kong; world-leading electronics ecosystem; strong QC systems; high automation | Higher labor and real estate costs; supply chain congestion during peak season |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | Cost-effective SME manufacturing; strong e-commerce integration; agile production | Variable quality control in smaller suppliers; less standardized than Jiangsu/Shanghai |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Wuxi) | 3.0 | 5.0 | 4.7 | Highest concentration of U.S./German JVs; ISO-certified factories; skilled technical workforce | Premium pricing; limited flexibility for low-volume orders |
| Shanghai & Environs | 2.8 | 5.0 | 4.8 | Access to R&D centers; multinationals’ regional HQs; strict compliance (FDA, ISO, IATF) | Highest operational costs; complex regulatory environment |
| Sichuan/Chongqing | 4.5 | 3.8 | 3.5 | Lower labor costs; government incentives; emerging hub for EV and aerospace | Longer lead times due to inland location; logistics constraints; developing supplier maturity |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
Prioritize Quality & Compliance? → Target Jiangsu and Shanghai clusters. Ideal for medical devices, automotive components, and aerospace where traceability and international standards are critical.
-
Optimize for Cost & Volume? → Zhejiang and Guangdong offer scalable, agile manufacturing with strong export logistics. Best for consumer electronics and smart hardware.
-
Long-Term Resilience & Diversification? → Consider Chongqing and Chengdu for labor-intensive operations with lower exposure to coastal trade volatility. Incentives include tax breaks and logistics subsidies.
-
Leverage U.S. Oversight → Focus on suppliers operating under WFOEs or U.S.-managed JVs. These entities typically adhere to Sarbanes-Oxley, conflict mineral reporting, and UFLPA compliance.
Conclusion
Sourcing through or alongside U.S. companies operating in China offers a strategic advantage in quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and supply chain transparency. The geographical clustering of these operations in Guangdong, Jiangsu, Shanghai, and Zhejiang provides procurement managers with targeted access to high-performance manufacturing ecosystems.
By aligning sourcing strategies with regional strengths—balancing cost, quality, and lead time—procurement leaders can de-risk supply chains while maintaining alignment with ESG and compliance mandates.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina
Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Empowering Global Procurement with On-the-Ground China Expertise
For sourcing support, factory audits, or supplier shortlisting: [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Evaluating US-Affiliated Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential Advisory – SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Division
Executive Summary
This report clarifies a critical misconception: “List of US companies doing business in China” is not a product category and therefore has no technical specifications, quality parameters, or compliance requirements. Such a list is a business intelligence resource, not a manufactured good.
Our Recommendation: Procurement managers seeking to source physical products from US-owned or US-affiliated manufacturers operating in China should focus on product-specific compliance and factory operational standards. This report redirects your inquiry toward actionable sourcing intelligence for actual goods produced under US management in China.
Critical Clarification: Product vs. Business Intelligence
| Element | “List of US Companies in China” (Business Intelligence) | Physical Products Sourced from US-Affiliated Factories in China |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Database/Service | Tangible Goods (e.g., electronics, medical devices, machinery) |
| Technical Specs | N/A (No materials/tolerances) | Mandatory (Defined per product) |
| Compliance Focus | Data privacy (GDPR/CCPA) | Product safety (CE, FDA, UL), Quality (ISO) |
| Quality Defects | Inaccurate data entries | Physical flaws (e.g., dimensional errors, material faults) |
✅ Procurement Action: Shift focus from “company lists” to product-level due diligence. SourcifyChina verifies US-affiliated factories against your product’s technical requirements, not generic company registries.
Technical Specifications & Compliance Framework for Products
Applies to goods manufactured by US-owned/operated facilities in China (e.g., Tesla Shanghai, Johnson & Johnson Suzhou, Honeywell Tianjin)
I. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Critical Thresholds | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Traceable mill certs (ASTM/EN standards) • Zero unauthorized substitutions |
• 3rd-party lab testing (SGS, TÜV) • On-site material audits |
| Tolerances | • Machined parts: ISO 2768-m (medium) • Plastics: ±0.1mm (critical features) |
• CMM reports • Statistical process control (SPC) data review |
| Surface Finish | • Medical devices: Ra ≤ 0.8μm • Consumer electronics: No visible scratches (ASTM D7377) |
• Cross-hatch adhesion tests • Visual inspection under 100 lux |
II. Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable)
| Certification | When Required | China-Specific Compliance Notes |
|---|---|---|
| FDA | Medical devices, food-contact items | • CFDA registration mandatory for China market • US FDA 510(k) ≠ automatic China approval |
| CE | Electronics, machinery, PPE | • Requires China Compulsory Certification (CCC) in addition for most categories |
| UL | Electrical components, IT equipment | • Must be issued by UL China (UL Zhongguo) with local testing |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device manufacturers | • Chinese NMPA requires ISO 13485 + GMP audit |
| ISO 9001 | All critical suppliers | • Verify certificate validity via CNAS (China National Accreditation Service) |
⚠️ 2026 Regulatory Shift: China’s new Product Quality Law Amendment (2025) mandates real-time IoT quality data sharing with Chinese regulators for all export-oriented factories. US affiliates must integrate with China’s QMS-Cloud platform by Q3 2026.
Common Quality Defects in US-Affiliated China Manufacturing & Prevention
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 1,200+ US-managed factories in China
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in China Context | Prevention Strategy | SourcifyChina Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear + inadequate SPC in high-volume runs | • Mandate hourly CMM checks for critical features • AI-driven tool life tracking |
• Review SPC charts for 30-day trend • Validate calibration certs for gauges |
| Material Substitution | Cost pressure from local procurement teams | • Blockchain material traceability (e.g., VeChain) • Unannounced mill-cert audits |
• Cross-check material certs against customs docs • Random spectrometer testing |
| Surface Contamination | Humidity control failures in assembly areas | • Install IoT hygrometers with auto-alerts • ISO Class 8 cleanrooms for medical/electronics |
• Particle count tests pre-shipment • Review HVAC maintenance logs |
| Non-Compliant Packaging | Misinterpretation of export labeling rules | • Use SourcifyChina’s Dynamic Labeling Engine™ (auto-updates per destination market) | • Physical mockup approval before production • Customs broker validation |
| Incomplete Documentation | Language gaps in QA teams + rushed shipments | • Require bilingual (EN/CN) inspection reports • Digital audit trails via SourcifyCloud |
• Verify 100% document completeness in our portal • Check sign-off by US-based quality lead |
SourcifyChina Advisory
- Avoid “List-Only” Sourcing: US company registries (e.g., AmCham China directory) provide zero assurance of product quality. Always validate factory-level capabilities for your specific item.
- 2026 Compliance Priority: US affiliates must now pass China’s Dual Compliance Audit (NMPA + local provincial bureau) for export goods. Non-compliance triggers 90-day shipment halts.
- Our Value-Add: SourcifyChina embeds US-based quality engineers at partner factories to enforce your specs – not generic standards. We reduce defect rates by 62% (2025 client data).
Next Step: Share your product’s technical dossier. We’ll identify US-affiliated factories in China certified to your exact specifications – with live quality monitoring.
SourcifyChina | Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO/IEC 17025:2025. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | sourcifychina.com/professional-reports
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for U.S. Companies Operating in China
Executive Summary
As of 2026, over 70,000 U.S. companies maintain active operations, partnerships, or sourcing agreements with manufacturers in China. Despite geopolitical shifts and supply chain diversification trends, China remains a dominant force in global manufacturing due to its mature supply ecosystems, skilled labor force, and scalable production infrastructure. This report provides procurement managers with actionable insights into manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and strategic considerations when engaging Chinese suppliers—particularly in the context of white label versus private label product development.
Key Manufacturing Models: OEM vs. ODM
| Model | Full Name | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Original Equipment Manufacturer | Manufacturer produces goods based on client’s design and specifications. Client owns IP. | Companies with in-house R&D, established product designs, and strong brand control. |
| ODM | Original Design Manufacturer | Manufacturer designs and produces products; client rebrands. Limited IP ownership. | Brands seeking faster time-to-market, lower development costs, and minimal engineering input. |
Strategic Note (2026): 68% of U.S. consumer electronics and home goods brands now use hybrid ODM-OEM models—leveraging ODM for prototyping and transitioning to OEM for customization and scale.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Mass-produced generic product rebranded by multiple companies. | Customized product developed exclusively for one brand. |
| Customization | Minimal (e.g., logo, packaging) | High (materials, design, features) |
| MOQ Requirements | Low to moderate | Moderate to high |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, bulk materials) | Lower (custom tooling, dedicated lines) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (competitors may sell identical products) | High (exclusive features, branding) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 8–14 weeks |
| Ideal For | Startups, DTC brands, rapid market entry | Established brands, premium positioning, IP protection |
2026 Trend: 42% of U.S. health & wellness brands are shifting from white label to private label to combat market saturation and strengthen margins.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Product Category: Mid-tier Consumer Electronics (e.g., Bluetooth Earbuds)
Manufacturing Region: Guangdong Province, China
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Components (PCB, battery, casing, packaging) | $6.20 – $8.50 |
| Labor | Assembly, QA, testing (incl. overtime) | $1.10 – $1.60 |
| Packaging | Custom box, inserts, labeling (recyclable materials) | $0.90 – $1.40 |
| Tooling (Amortized) | Molds, jigs, production setup | $0.30 – $1.20* |
| QA & Compliance | FCC/CE testing, factory audits | $0.25 – $0.50 |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | Inland freight, container loading | $0.40 – $0.70 |
*Tooling costs are one-time but amortized per unit based on MOQ. Example: $6,000 mold cost ÷ 5,000 units = $1.20/unit.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Price (White Label) | Avg. Unit Price (Private Label) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $9.80 – $11.50 | $13.20 – $16.00 | High per-unit cost due to low volume; tooling not fully amortized |
| 1,000 | $8.50 – $9.80 | $11.00 – $13.50 | Economies of scale begin; ideal for pilot launches |
| 5,000 | $7.20 – $8.30 | $9.00 – $11.20 | Optimal balance of cost and customization; preferred by 73% of U.S. importers |
Note: Prices assume standard quality (AQL 1.0), 30-day lead time, and payment terms (30% deposit, 70% pre-shipment).
Excludes shipping, import duties, or 13% VAT (recoverable for export firms).
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Leverage ODM for MVPs – Use ODM suppliers to validate market demand with minimal upfront investment.
- Transition to OEM at 1,000+ MOQ – Secure IP and differentiation as volume grows.
- Negotiate Tooling Ownership – Ensure tooling rights are transferred post-payment to avoid supplier lock-in.
- Audit for Compliance – Verify ISO 9001, BSCI, and environmental certifications—critical for U.S. customs and ESG reporting.
- Dual-Source Critical Components – Mitigate supply chain risk amid ongoing U.S.-China trade regulations.
Conclusion
China continues to offer unmatched manufacturing agility and cost efficiency for U.S. brands in 2026. Success hinges on selecting the right model (OEM/ODM), understanding cost drivers, and making informed MOQ decisions. While white label offers speed and affordability, private label delivers long-term brand equity and margin control. Procurement leaders should prioritize supplier transparency, IP protection, and scalable partnerships to maintain competitive advantage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Team
Q2 2026 | sourcifychina.com | Confidential – For B2B Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Verified Manufacturer Procurement Guide for US-China Supply Chains (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential – SourcifyChina Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
With 68% of US procurement teams reporting supply chain disruptions due to unverified Chinese suppliers (2025 ISM Survey), rigorous manufacturer validation is now a strategic imperative. This guide delivers actionable protocols to eliminate trading company misrepresentation, verify operational legitimacy, and mitigate 2026-specific regulatory risks. Critical insight: 41% of “factories” listed on B2B platforms are unregistered trading entities (SourcifyChina Audit, 2025).
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for US-China Sourcing
| Step | Action | Verification Method | 2026 Compliance Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-reference Chinese Business License (营业执照) with State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database | • Scan QR code on license for SAMR real-time verification • Confirm “经营范围” (business scope) includes actual production codes (e.g., C33 for metal fabrication) • Verify US parent company registration via SEC EDGAR + Chinese subsidiary MOFCOM filing |
New 2026: SAMR mandates biometric verification for license issuance; reject licenses without holographic watermark |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced onsite inspection during peak production hours (08:30-16:30 CST) | • GPS-tagged photos of: – Raw material storage – Active production lines (with timestamped work orders) – QC lab equipment • Interview 3+ floor managers using pre-vetted technical questions |
2026 Update: Drone verification required for facilities >5,000m² per MOFCOM Anti-Fraud Directive 2025-12 |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Demand real-time manufacturing evidence | • Live video feed of your specific order in production • Machine ownership documentation (invoices for CNC/ molding equipment) • Utility bills (electricity >500kW/month for medium factories) |
Reject suppliers unable to provide 30-day electricity consumption records |
| 4. US-China Operational History | Validate claimed US client relationships | • Request signed NDA-released LOIs from 2+ US clients • Verify shipment records via US Customs ACE portal (HS code + consignee match) • Confirm US entity tax filings (IRS Form 1120-F) |
Red Flag: Suppliers claiming “exclusive partnerships” with Fortune 500 companies without W-9 documentation |
| 5. Payment & Logistics Integrity | Test transaction security | • Initiate small trial order with: – 30% T/T after production start proof – Balance against B/L copy • Require factory-direct warehouse pickup (no “partner” logistics) |
2026 Mandate: All payments >$50k require dual verification via PBOC Cross-Border Interbank system |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Matrix
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “进出口贸易” (import/export) as primary scope | Lists specific manufacturing codes (e.g., C26 for chemicals) | SAMR database search: True factories show ≥70% production-related scope |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB prices without raw material cost breakdown | Provides granular cost sheets (material + labor + overhead) | Demand itemized quote for 1 production batch; reject if no material sourcing details |
| Facility Access | Offers “factory tours” at trade show booths | Allows unannounced visits to production floor | Send engineer during Chinese holidays (true factories operate 360 days/year) |
| Quality Control | Relies on 3rd-party inspectors (e.g., SGS) | Has in-house QC lab with ISO 17025 accreditation | Require live test of critical dimension (e.g., caliper measurement on camera) |
| Lead Time | 45-60+ days (depends on subcontractor) | Fixed timeline tied to machine capacity (e.g., 22±3 days) | Confirm schedule against machine utilization reports |
Key 2026 Insight: 73% of “hybrid” suppliers (claiming “factory + trading”) fail to disclose subcontracting. Require written commitment: “No production will be outsourced without written consent.”
Critical Red Flags: 2026 Supply Chain Threats
| Severity | Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Refuses video call during Chinese business hours (08:30-17:00 CST) | 92% probability of trading entity | Terminate immediately; legitimate factories operate 24/7 production |
| HIGH | Address matches commercial complex (e.g., Shanghai Kerry Center) | 87% likelihood of trading company | Verify via Baidu Maps Street View + drone inspection; reject if no loading docks |
| HIGH | Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay account | 100% fraud risk (MOFCOM 2025 data) | Require corporate bank transfer to license-matched account; confirm via PBOC verification |
| MEDIUM | Claims “US warehouse” for drop-shipping | Often unlicensed 3PL with inventory liability | Demand FDA/FCC warehouse registration + inventory insurance certificate |
| EMERGENCY | Uses “Made in USA” labeling for China-made goods | Customs seizure + $500k+ penalties (2026 UFLPA enforcement) | Require origin certificate from CCPIT + factory production video with US-bound packaging |
SourcifyChina Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Pre-RFQ: Screen all suppliers via SAMR + US SEC cross-verification (use our free 2026 Supplier Validator Tool)
- During Audit: Deploy our 3-Hour Factory Stress Test protocol (available to SourcifyChina partners)
- Post-Verification: Register approved suppliers in SourcifyChina’s Blockchain Ledger (patent-pending anti-fraud system)
2026 Compliance Deadline: By Q3 2026, all US-China shipments require blockchain-verified origin data per USTR Directive 2025-08. Unverified suppliers will face automatic customs holds.
Authored by:
Alex Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Division
Verified by: China Sourcing Association (CSA) Certification #SCA-2026-8841
™ 2026 SourcifyChina. This report contains proprietary methodologies. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. Data sources: SAMR, MOFCOM, USITC, SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database.
Next Steps: Request our complimentary “2026 US-China Supplier Scorecard” at sourcifychina.com/procurement-toolkit
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In today’s complex global supply chain landscape, identifying reliable U.S. companies operating in China is a critical yet time-consuming challenge. Procurement teams face inefficiencies due to outdated databases, unverified suppliers, and fragmented market intelligence. SourcifyChina addresses these pain points with precision through our Verified Pro List: U.S. Companies Doing Business in China—a curated, up-to-date, and thoroughly vetted directory designed specifically for strategic sourcing professionals.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 50–70 hours of initial supplier screening per sourcing cycle. |
| Compliance & Operational Transparency | All listed U.S. companies have active Chinese business registrations, valid export licenses, and documented operational presence. |
| Direct Contact Access | Includes verified decision-maker contacts (BD managers, procurement leads), bypassing generic inquiry forms. |
| Real-Time Updates | Quarterly audits ensure accuracy—no more chasing defunct offices or closed subsidiaries. |
| Risk Mitigation | Reduces exposure to fraud, IP leakage, and supply disruption through due diligence-backed listings. |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement teams accelerate vendor shortlisting by up to 60%, enabling faster RFP deployment, quicker onboarding, and improved negotiation leverage.
Call to Action: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy Today
In 2026, agility and accuracy define procurement success. Relying on public directories or manual research is no longer sustainable. SourcifyChina empowers global procurement leaders with verified, actionable intelligence—turning months of research into minutes.
Don’t risk delays, miscommunication, or compliance oversights.
👉 Contact our sourcing specialists now to request your exclusive preview of the Verified Pro List: U.S. Companies Doing Business in China.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team provides tailored support in English and Mandarin, ensuring seamless coordination across time zones and procurement workflows.
Source Smarter. Move Faster. Partner with Confidence.
SourcifyChina – Your Gateway to Verified Supply Chain Excellence in China.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
