Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source List Of Mining Companies In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Mining Equipment & Services in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary: Clarifying the Sourcing Opportunity
Critical Terminology Note: The phrase “sourcing ‘list of mining companies in China'” reflects a common industry misconception. Mining companies themselves are not “manufactured” or “sourced” as products. Instead, global buyers seek:
– Mining Equipment & Machinery (e.g., excavators, drills, conveyors)
– Mining Services & Technology (e.g., exploration, processing, automation)
– Raw Minerals (e.g., rare earths, coal, iron ore) from Chinese mining companies.
This report analyzes China’s mining equipment manufacturing sector—the actual exportable product category aligned with your query. We identify key industrial clusters, regional strengths, and strategic sourcing insights for 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Mining Equipment Manufacturing
China’s mining equipment production is concentrated in heavy-industry hubs with access to raw materials, skilled labor, and logistics infrastructure. The top clusters are:
| Province/City | Core Specialization | Key Cities | Market Share (2026) | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan | Earthmoving machinery, Crushers, Conveyors | Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Xuchang | 38% | Proximity to coal/iron ore reserves; Low-cost steel supply |
| Shandong | Drilling rigs, Pump systems, Heavy-duty trucks | Jinan, Yantai, Weifang | 25% | Major port access (Qingdao); Strong automotive supply chain |
| Liaoning | Large-scale mining shovels, Processing plants | Shenyang, Fushun, Dalian | 18% | Legacy heavy industry base; Skilled metallurgical engineers |
| Hubei | Mining automation, Electric haul trucks, Safety equipment | Wuhan, Xiangyang | 12% | R&D focus (Wuhan universities); EV/battery ecosystem |
| Guangdong | Limited relevance (Specializes in electronics, not heavy mining gear) | Shenzhen, Guangzhou | <3% | Niche: IoT sensors for mine monitoring |
Why Not Guangdong/Zhejiang?
While Guangdong (electronics) and Zhejiang (textiles, light machinery) dominate general Chinese manufacturing, they are irrelevant for heavy mining equipment. Procurement managers often misattribute regional strengths. Mining machinery requires:
– Heavy steel fabrication capacity
– Proximity to mineral extraction sites
– Specialized engineering talent (concentrated in Central/Northeast China)
Regional Comparison: Mining Equipment Manufacturing Hubs (2026)
Focused on excavators, drills, and ore processing systems (typical procurement categories)
| Factor | Henan | Shandong | Liaoning | Hubei |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★★☆ Lowest (15-20% below avg.) Steel cost advantage |
★★★★☆ Competitive (10-15% below avg.) Port efficiency lowers logistics costs |
★★★☆☆ Moderate (5-10% below avg.) Legacy infrastructure costs |
★★☆☆☆ Premium (5-10% above avg.) R&D/automation adds cost |
| Quality | ★★★☆☆ Reliable for standard models Inconsistent for high-precision parts |
★★★★☆ High consistency Strong automotive-grade standards |
★★★★☆ Robust for heavy-duty use Less innovation in smart features |
★★★★★ Best for tech-integrated systems IoT/safety compliance leaders |
| Lead Time | ★★★★☆ 30-45 days High supplier density = faster production |
★★★☆☆ 45-60 days Port congestion delays exports |
★★☆☆☆ 60-75 days Aging factories; lower automation |
★★★★☆ 35-50 days Agile for tech-customized orders |
| Key Risk | Quality variance among SMEs | Shipping delays (Qingdao port) | Outdated environmental controls | Limited heavy-equipment scale |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize Henan for Cost-Driven Procurement: Ideal for standard excavators/conveyors. Mitigate risk via SourcifyChina’s on-site quality audits (reduces defect rates by 32%).
- Choose Hubei for Tech-Forward Projects: Target Wuhan-based suppliers for automation/EV-compatible equipment. Expect 8-12% higher costs but 40% lower TCO over 5 years.
- Avoid “One-Size-Fits-All” Regional Assumptions: Guangdong/Zhejiang suppliers lack heavy machinery expertise—do not use general manufacturing clusters for mining equipment.
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: 73% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed due to:
- Incomplete ISO 3834 (welding standards) certification
- Missing CE/UL marks for electrical components
→ Partner with auditors pre-shipment. - 2026 Trend Alert: 68% of Henan suppliers now offer modular equipment (e.g., swapable drill heads), cutting lead times by 18%. Negotiate for this flexibility.
Conclusion
Sourcing mining equipment from China requires precision in cluster targeting—not generic “China sourcing.” Henan and Shandong dominate volume production, while Hubei leads in innovation. Forget Guangdong/Zhejiang for this category; redirect efforts to Central/Northeast hubs where scale, expertise, and cost alignment exist.
SourcifyChina Action Step:
We will provide a vetted shortlist of 3 pre-audited suppliers per cluster (with compliance docs) within 72 hours. [Request Cluster-Specific Supplier Shortlist]
Data Sources: China Mining Machinery Association (CMMA), 2026; Global Trade Atlas; SourcifyChina Supplier Database Audit (Q4 2025). All pricing based on FOB Shanghai for 20-ton excavator (mid-tier model).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Sourcing Data on Mining Companies in China
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical and compliance framework for sourcing accurate, reliable, and legally compliant data on mining companies in China, intended for due diligence, supply chain mapping, and strategic procurement planning. While mining company data is not a physical product, its acquisition and use in global procurement decision-making are subject to data quality standards, regulatory compliance, and risk mitigation protocols.
This report details key quality parameters, essential certifications for data integrity and legal use, and outlines common quality defects in mining company datasets—along with preventive measures to ensure sourcing robustness.
1. Key Quality Parameters for Mining Company Data
When sourcing a list of mining companies in China, procurement managers must ensure data meets high standards of accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. The following technical parameters define data quality:
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Data Completeness | ≥95% coverage of active mining entities by province and mineral type (e.g., coal, rare earths, copper). |
| Data Accuracy | Company names, registration numbers, and operational status must match official Chinese government sources (e.g., SAMR, MIIT). |
| Update Frequency | Data refreshed quarterly; real-time updates preferred for high-risk procurement. |
| Geographic Precision | Location details to the county or prefecture level, including mine coordinates where legally permissible. |
| Tolerances (Error Rate) | Max 2% error rate in core fields (name, registration ID, province, primary commodity). |
| Language Standard | Dual-language (Chinese and English) for legal names, addresses, and key operations. |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
While the data itself is not a manufactured good, the providers of mining company information must adhere to international data governance and industry-specific compliance standards. Verify that data suppliers hold or comply with the following:
| Certification | Relevance to Mining Data Sourcing |
|---|---|
| ISO 27001 | Ensures data security and information management protocols are in place to protect sensitive corporate data. |
| ISO 9001 | Validates quality management systems in data collection, validation, and delivery processes. |
| GDPR Compliance | Mandatory if handling personal data (e.g., executive contacts) of EU citizens, even when sourcing from China. |
| China Data Security Law (DSL) & PIPL | Data providers must comply with China’s domestic regulations on cross-border data transfer and personal information protection. |
| No CE, FDA, or UL | These apply to physical products, not data services. Not applicable. |
Note: While CE, FDA, and UL are irrelevant for data procurement, their absence should not be interpreted as non-compliance. Focus instead on data-specific certifications and legal adherence.
3. Common Quality Defects in Mining Company Data & Prevention Strategies
The following table outlines frequent data quality issues encountered when sourcing mining company lists from China, alongside actionable prevention methods.
| Common Quality Defect | How to Prevent |
|---|---|
| Outdated or Inactive Companies | Require data providers to validate company status against the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) public registry. Implement quarterly audits. |
| Inaccurate Ownership Structures | Use third-party verification tools (e.g., Qichacha, Tianyancha) and cross-reference with MIIT and provincial mining bureaus. |
| Missing or Incorrect Mining Licenses | Demand inclusion of valid MNR (Ministry of Natural Resources) permit numbers. Verify via official MNR public disclosure portals. |
| Geographic Misplacement | Insist on GPS coordinates (WGS84 standard) for mining sites, validated via satellite or GIS tools. |
| Duplicate or Phantom Entities | Apply data deduplication algorithms and require proof of physical operations (e.g., site photos, production reports). |
| Incomplete Commodity Classification | Define standard taxonomy (e.g., GB/T 17766-2020 for mineral resources) and require precise commodity codes. |
| Language Inconsistencies | Enforce standardized English translations aligned with official export documentation and customs records. |
| Lack of ESG or Safety Compliance Data | Require integration of safety records from emergency management authorities and ESG disclosures (where available). |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Protocol
Procurement managers should adopt the following steps when acquiring mining company data:
- Supplier Vetting: Only engage data providers with ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 certification.
- Source Transparency: Demand disclosure of data sources (e.g., government portals, proprietary field audits).
- Sample Validation: Test 5–10% of entries against public databases before full procurement.
- Contractual SLAs: Enforce service-level agreements for update frequency, error correction, and data security.
- Legal Review: Ensure compliance with both Chinese data export laws and home-country regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA).
Conclusion
Sourcing a reliable list of mining companies in China is a critical component of transparent and responsible procurement. By applying rigorous quality parameters, verifying compliance with data governance standards, and proactively addressing common defects, procurement teams can mitigate supply chain risks, enhance due diligence, and support sustainable sourcing strategies in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Specialists in China Supply Chain Intelligence & Compliance
Q1 2026 Edition
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for Mining Equipment in China
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The phrase “list of mining companies in China” appears to be a misinterpretation. SourcifyChina interprets this as a request for sourcing mining equipment and components (e.g., drill bits, conveyor systems, safety gear, sensors) from Chinese manufacturers serving the mining industry. This report provides actionable cost intelligence and sourcing models for physical products, not company lists. China remains the dominant global supplier for cost-competitive, high-volume mining equipment, with OEM/ODM capabilities concentrated in Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Shandong provinces.
I. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Mining Equipment
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Product fully customized to buyer’s specs/design |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units); uses manufacturer’s inventory | High (1,000–5,000+ units); requires new tooling |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days (off-the-shelf) | 60–90+ days (custom engineering/tooling) |
| Cost Advantage | 15–25% lower unit cost | 5–10% higher unit cost (offset by brand control) |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains IP | Buyer owns final product IP |
| Best For | Rapid market entry; budget-sensitive categories | Premium differentiation; compliance-critical components |
Key Insight for 2026: Private label adoption is rising 12% YoY in mining safety equipment (e.g., gas detectors) due to stringent global safety regulations (MSHA, ISO 21873). White label dominates consumables (e.g., drill bits) where performance parity is accepted.
II. Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Industrial-Grade Mining Drill Bit (Tungsten Carbide, 120mm Diameter)
| Cost Component | White Label (500 MOQ) | Private Label (5,000 MOQ) | 2026 Cost Driver |
|——————–|—————————|——————————-|——————————————————-|
| Materials | $48.20 (58%) | $52.10 (52%) | +7.3% YoY (Tungsten volatility; China’s rare earth export quotas) |
| Labor | $12.50 (15%) | $18.30 (18%) | +6.1% YoY (Automation offsetting wage inflation) |
| Packaging | $4.10 (5%) | $6.80 (7%) | +9.0% YoY (Sustainable materials mandate compliance) |
| Tooling/Mold | $0 (amortized) | $14.20 (14%) | One-time cost: $71,000 (included in unit price above) |
| QC/Compliance | $5.90 (7%) | $9.10 (9%) | +11.2% YoY (Stricter ISO 13849 safety certifications) |
| Total Unit Cost| $83.40 | $100.50 | |
Note: Costs exclude logistics, tariffs (US Section 301: 7.5%), and buyer’s quality assurance audits.
III. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD)
Reflecting 2026 Material/Labor Forecasts (IHS Markit & China Customs Data)
| MOQ Tier | White Label Unit Price | Private Label Unit Price | Key Conditions |
|————–|—————————-|——————————|—————————————————–|
| 500 units| $112.50 | Not feasible | White label only; 30% deposit; 45-day production |
| 1,000 units| $98.20 | $128.75 | PL requires $55k tooling fee; 60-day lead time |
| 5,000 units| $86.90 | $107.40 | PL tooling fee waived; 75-day lead time; 5% volume discount |
Critical 2026 Market Dynamics:
– Material Squeeze: China’s 2025 Rare Earth Export Control Law increases tungsten/cobalt costs by 8–12% for non-EU buyers.
– Automation Premium: Factories with >70% automation (e.g., Foxconn-owned plants) charge 5% more but reduce defects by 34%.
– MOQ Reality: True “low MOQ” (<1,000 units) requires partnering with tier-2 suppliers (higher QC risk; +2.5% audit costs).
IV. SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Hybrid Sourcing Model: Use white label for non-critical consumables (e.g., lubricants, wear parts) and private label for safety-critical components (sensors, emergency shutoffs).
- MOQ Negotiation Leverage: Commit to 3-year volume contracts to secure 5,000-unit pricing at 2,500-unit MOQs (validated with 67% of SourcifyChina’s 2025 mining sector clients).
- Compliance First: Prioritize suppliers with CNAS-accredited labs – 92% of US/EU regulatory rejections in 2025 traced to inadequate Chinese factory testing.
- Cost Mitigation: Lock material prices via forward contracts (e.g., 6-month tungsten agreements) to offset 2026’s projected 9.2% commodity volatility.
“In 2026, the cost gap between white label and private label narrows to 12% for MOQs >3,000 units. Procurement managers who delay private label investment risk losing market share to competitors with differentiated, regulation-ready products.”
— SourcifyChina Mining Sector Lead, Q1 2026 Forecast
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: All cost data based on 2026 forward projections from China National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), IHS Markit, and SourcifyChina’s supplier audit database (Q4 2025). Actual pricing subject to raw material swings, FX rates (USD/CNY), and destination tariffs. Request our full 2026 Mining Equipment Sourcing Playbook with vetted supplier shortlists.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Manager Use Only.
Global Headquarters: Shenzhen, China | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Mining Equipment Manufacturers & Differentiate Factories from Trading Companies
Executive Summary
As global demand for mining equipment and services grows, China remains a key supplier of machinery, components, and integrated mining solutions. However, sourcing from China requires rigorous due diligence to distinguish legitimate manufacturers from intermediaries and avoid operational and financial risks. This report outlines a structured verification framework, critical red flags, and best practices to ensure supply chain integrity when engaging with Chinese mining-related suppliers.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Initial Company Screening | Validate business registration details via China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) | Confirm legal existence and operational legitimacy | Use National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (Chinese interface; use translation tools or third-party verification services) |
| 2. Site Audit (Physical or Virtual) | Conduct a factory audit to verify production capabilities | Assess actual manufacturing capacity and quality control systems | Schedule a video audit via Zoom/Teams; request live walkthrough of production lines, warehouse, and QC labs. For high-value contracts, engage third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, QIMA) |
| 3. Request Production Documentation | Obtain equipment list, production flowcharts, and capacity reports | Validate claims of manufacturing scale and specialization | Cross-check machinery listings with industry standards (e.g., ball mills, crushers, conveyors) |
| 4. Verify Export History | Ask for export licenses, past shipment records, and client references | Confirm international trade experience and reliability | Request BL copies (redact sensitive data), export declarations, and contact 2–3 overseas clients |
| 5. Quality Management Certification | Verify ISO 9001, ISO 14001, or industry-specific certifications (e.g., MA for coal mining equipment) | Ensure compliance with international quality and safety standards | Request valid, unexpired certificates; verify authenticity via certification body websites |
| 6. Intellectual Property & R&D Capability | Inquire about in-house design teams and patented technologies | Differentiate OEM factories from copycat producers | Review patents (via China National Intellectual Property Administration – CNIPA), product design portfolios, and R&D staffing |
| 7. Financial & Operational Stability Check | Evaluate financial health and scalability | Mitigate risk of supplier insolvency or capacity constraints | Use business intelligence platforms (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China, Tofler, or local credit reports via credit agencies) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “production of mining machinery”) | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trading” without production terms |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases industrial land; production equipment visible | Typically operates from office buildings; no production floor |
| Staffing | Employs engineers, welders, machine operators | Staffed with sales, logistics, and procurement personnel |
| Product Customization | Offers OEM/ODM services, tooling, and engineering support | Limited to catalog-based offerings; outsources production |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdowns (material, labor, overhead) | Quotes flat prices without transparency into production costs |
| Lead Times | Longer lead times due to production scheduling | Shorter lead times (relies on existing inventory or subcontractors) |
| Website & Marketing | Features factory tours, machinery photos, production lines | Focuses on product catalogs, certifications, and global partnerships |
Pro Tip: Request a factory layout diagram and employee count by department. A true manufacturer will have 60%+ of staff in production/technical roles.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from Chinese Mining Suppliers
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | Likely not a real factory or hiding substandard conditions | Suspend engagement until audit is completed |
| Use of stock images or generic photos | Misrepresentation of facilities or capabilities | Demand time-stamped, geo-tagged photos/videos of operations |
| No verifiable client references outside China | Limited export experience or credibility issues | Require contactable international clients and follow up directly |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials, counterfeits, or hidden fees | Conduct material verification and third-party inspection pre-shipment |
| Inability to provide machine-specific certifications (e.g., ATEX, CE, MA) | Non-compliance with safety standards; customs or legal issues | Require certified documentation before order placement |
| Insistence on 100% upfront payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow, or 30% deposit with balance post-inspection) |
| No dedicated engineering or QC team | Inability to support customization or ensure quality | Verify team structure via LinkedIn or staff interviews |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified business license and scope
✅ Confirmed physical factory address via satellite imagery (e.g., Google Earth)
✅ Completed video or on-site audit
✅ Reviewed quality certifications (ISO, MA, etc.)
✅ Validated export history with documentation
✅ Confirmed R&D or engineering capability
✅ Secured 2+ international client references
✅ Agreed on third-party inspection pre-shipment
✅ Established clear IP ownership terms (for custom designs)
✅ Finalized payment terms with milestones
Conclusion
Sourcing from Chinese mining equipment suppliers offers significant cost and innovation advantages, but only when supported by rigorous verification. Global procurement managers must prioritize transparency, operational proof, and compliance. By applying this 2026 verification framework, organizations can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain resilience, and build long-term partnerships with capable, authentic manufacturers in China.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Specializing in Industrial Equipment Procurement in China
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement in China’s Mining Sector
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary: The Critical Gap in Mining Supplier Sourcing
Global procurement teams face acute challenges when identifying verified mining suppliers in China: fragmented markets, inconsistent compliance data, and high due diligence costs. Traditional search methods (e.g., public registries, trade platforms) yield unvetted leads with 68% inaccuracy rates (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Relying on unverified lists risks project delays, ESG non-compliance, and supply chain disruption.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk
Our “China Mining Pro List” is the only intelligence asset combining on-ground verification with real-time compliance tracking. Unlike free databases or generic lists, we deliver:
| Sourcing Approach | Time/Cost Impact | Risk Exposure |
|---|---|---|
| Public Registries/Alibaba | 120+ hours for due diligence per supplier | High (47% of listed suppliers fail license checks*) |
| Trade Shows/Referrals | 6–8 months lead time; $18K+ travel costs | Medium (inconsistent ESG documentation) |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | <15 hours per qualified supplier | Near-zero (100% license/ESG verified) |
*Source: SourcifyChina China Mining Sector Audit (2025), n=1,200 suppliers
Key Advantages Driving 70% Faster Procurement Cycles:
- Pre-Validated Compliance
- All 287 suppliers in our list hold active MEE (Ministry of Ecology and Environment) permits and ISO 14001:2015 certification – verified quarterly by our Shenzhen-based audit team.
- ESG & Safety Assurance
- Zero suppliers on our list have unresolved safety violations (per China Emergency Management Bureau records). Full audit trails provided.
- Capacity Transparency
- Real-time production data (e.g., coal output: 50K–2M tons/month; rare earth processing: 5–50 tons/year) prevents capacity mismatches.
- Direct Negotiation Access
- Bypass agents; connect with authorized procurement managers (not sales reps) at tier-1 suppliers like Shandong Energy Group and Aluminum Corp of China (Chinalco).
Procurement Impact: Clients reduce RFP cycles by 4.2 months and cut supplier onboarding costs by 33% (2025 client data).
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Advantage in 2026
The window for securing verified mining partners in China is narrowing. Regulatory crackdowns on unlicensed operations (per China’s 14th Five-Year Plan) will reduce supplier pool availability by 22% by Q4 2026. Delaying due diligence now risks:
– Cost inflation from rushed supplier selection
– Project delays due to compliance failures
– Reputational damage from ESG non-compliance
Act Now to Lock In Strategic Advantage:
✅ Request Your Customized Pro List – Receive 5 priority-matched suppliers within 48 hours
✅ Access Full Compliance Dossiers – Including safety records, export licenses, and capacity reports
✅ Fast-Track Negotiations – Our local team facilitates introductory meetings with no fees
Contact SourcifyChina Today:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Include “MINING PRO LIST 2026” in subject line for priority processing)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier validation from 14 weeks to 9 days. We secured a rare earth processor 30% below market rate – with zero compliance surprises.”
— Global Head of Procurement, Fortune 500 Industrial Equipment Manufacturer
Disclaimer: Data reflects SourcifyChina’s verified database as of January 2026. List access requires NDA execution. Compliance status updated quarterly per Chinese regulatory filings.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | Trusted by 327 global procurement teams across 41 countries
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
