Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Link China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Analysis for “Link China Wholesale” Integrated Supply Chain Services
Executive Summary
The term “link china wholesale” refers to integrated wholesale supply chain services connecting global buyers with Chinese manufacturers (e.g., sourcing agents, B2B platforms, and logistics coordinators). This is not a physical product but a service ecosystem. China dominates this sector due to its manufacturing density, digital infrastructure, and export expertise. This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional competitive advantages, and provides actionable insights for optimizing procurement strategy.
Critical Clarification: “Link China Wholesale” services facilitate transactions between buyers and factories. Sourcing these services requires evaluating service providers (not physical goods) in regions with mature B2B ecosystems. Misinterpreting this as a product category leads to supplier mismatches and contractual risks.
Key Industrial Clusters for “Link China Wholesale” Services
China’s wholesale linkage services concentrate in provinces with:
✅ High manufacturer density
✅ Digital trade infrastructure (e.g., Alibaba hubs, bonded warehouses)
✅ Customs/logistics expertise
✅ English-proficient B2B service firms
| Province/City | Core Service Focus | Key Strengths | Top Service Provider Types |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Electronics, hardware, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) | Shenzhen/Huizhou supply chain agility; 70% of China’s electronics exports | Tech-specialized sourcing agents, OEM/ODM integrators |
| (Shenzhen, Guangzhou) | |||
| Zhejiang | E-commerce, home goods, textiles, machinery | Yiwu (world’s largest wholesale market); Alibaba ecosystem; low-cost SME access | B2B platform operators (e.g., 1688.com affiliates), logistics consolidators |
| (Yiwu, Hangzhou) | |||
| Jiangsu | Industrial machinery, automotive parts, precision engineering | Proximity to Shanghai port; high-end manufacturing clusters (Suzhou Industrial Park) | Engineering-focused sourcing firms, quality control specialists |
| (Suzhou, Nanjing) | |||
| Fujian | Footwear, sportswear, furniture | Cost-competitive labor; strong private-sector export culture | Vertical-specific agents (e.g., footwear), factory-direct networks |
| (Quanzhou, Xiamen) |
Regional Comparison: Service Provider Capabilities (2026)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (SPI) of 1,200+ verified service providers
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu | Fujian |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★☆☆ Moderate-High Service fees: 8-12% (tech complexity premium). Lowest total landed cost for electronics due to logistics density. |
★★★★☆ Low-Moderate Service fees: 5-8%. Lowest MOQs (e.g., Yiwu: $500). Volume discounts for >50 SKUs. |
★★★☆☆ Moderate Service fees: 7-10%. Premium for engineering oversight. Best value for precision machinery. |
★★★★☆ Low Service fees: 4-7%. Lowest labor costs. High risk of hidden fees with unvetted agents. |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ High 95%+ provider compliance with ISO 9001. Strict QC for electronics. High English fluency (85%). |
★★★☆☆ Moderate-High 70% providers meet basic QC standards. Spotty English (50%). Strong in catalog accuracy for commodities. |
★★★★★ Very High 98% providers with engineering certifications. Dedicated QC teams. Best for technical specs compliance. |
★★☆☆☆ Moderate Variable QC (40% non-compliant with AQL 2.5). Language barriers common. Ideal for simple goods. |
| Lead Time | ★★★★☆ Fast 14-21 days (incl. customs). Shenzhen port efficiency + 24/7 logistics. Fastest for air freight. |
★★★☆☆ Moderate 21-30 days. Yiwu’s warehouse networks speed fulfillment but port congestion (Ningbo) adds delays. |
★★★★☆ Fast 18-25 days. Shanghai port proximity + rail links to Europe. Best for LCL sea freight reliability. |
★★☆☆☆ Slow 25-40 days. Limited direct port access; Xiamen port congestion. High seasonal delays (Q4). |
| Strategic Fit | Electronics/FMCG buyers needing speed & compliance | SMEs sourcing low-MOQ commodities via B2B platforms | Industrial buyers requiring technical oversight | Budget-focused buyers of simple goods (e.g., textiles) |
Critical Risk Mitigation Insights (2026)
- “Wholesale” ≠ Low Risk: 68% of disputes in 2025 stemmed from unvetted “wholesale” agents in Fujian/Zhejiang lacking export licenses. Always verify provider credentials via China’s MOFCOM registry.
- Hidden Cost Triggers: Guangdong’s efficiency reduces total costs despite higher fees; Fujian’s low fees often incur +15% in rework/customs delays.
- Digital Maturity Gap: Zhejiang leads in B2B platform integration (e.g., real-time inventory APIs), while Fujian relies on manual processes – impacting scalability.
- 2026 Regulatory Shift: New cross-border data laws require service providers to store buyer data in China (effective Q1 2026). Prioritize providers with GDPR-China PIPL compliance.
SourcifyChina Recommendations
- For High-Tech/Time-Sensitive Sourcing: Partner with Guangdong-based providers (e.g., Shenzhen) for end-to-end control. Budget 10-12% service fees but gain 30% faster time-to-market.
- For SME Commodity Buying: Use Zhejiang’s ecosystem (Yiwu/Hangzhou) via vetted platforms (e.g., 1688.com Gold Suppliers), but mandate third-party QC.
- Avoid “One-Size-Fits-All” Agents: 81% of procurement failures in 2025 involved agents operating outside their core cluster expertise.
- Demand Transparency: Require providers to disclose all fees (including port surcharges) in USD and share factory audit reports pre-contract.
Final Note: “Link China Wholesale” is a capability, not a product. Success hinges on matching your product complexity, volume, and risk tolerance to the right regional service ecosystem. Never source the service – source the expertise.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data cross-referenced with China General Administration of Customs (2025), MOFCOM Service Provider Registry, and SourcifyChina’s Global Client Performance Database.
Confidential: For recipient use only. ©2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing from Link China Wholesale
Overview
“Link China Wholesale” refers to a network of Chinese suppliers offering cost-effective components and finished goods across industries including electronics, hardware, medical devices, and industrial equipment. While sourcing through such channels offers competitive pricing and scalability, ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance is critical. This report outlines essential technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality assurance strategies for procurement professionals.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Guidelines |
|---|---|
| Materials | Must conform to industry-specific standards (e.g., RoHS-compliant plastics, medical-grade stainless steel 316L, UL-listed thermoplastics). Material certifications (e.g., Material Test Reports) must be provided upon request. |
| Tolerances | Machined parts: ±0.05 mm (standard), ±0.01 mm (precision). Sheet metal: ±0.1 mm. Injection-molded parts: ±0.2 mm. Tolerances must be verified via First Article Inspection (FAI) reports. |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 1.6 µm for precision components; Ra ≤ 3.2 µm for general use. Coatings (e.g., anodizing, powder coating) must be uniform and corrosion-resistant per ASTM B117. |
| Dimensional Stability | Components must maintain specifications under operational conditions (temperature, load, humidity). Environmental stress testing recommended. |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope & Relevance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for products sold in the European Economic Area (EEA). Indicates compliance with EU health, safety, and environmental standards (e.g., Machinery Directive, LVD, EMC). | Request EU Declaration of Conformity and technical file. |
| FDA Registration | Required for food-contact materials, medical devices, and pharmaceutical packaging. Facilities must be registered with FDA; products must meet 21 CFR standards. | Verify facility listing via FDA’s FURLS database. |
| UL Certification | Applies to electrical equipment, components, and safety systems in North America. UL Listed or Recognized components ensure fire and electrical safety. | Confirm listing on UL’s Online Certifications Directory. |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) standard. Ensures consistent manufacturing processes and defect control. | Audit report or certificate from accredited body (e.g., TÜV, SGS). |
| ISO 13485 | Required for medical device manufacturers. Specifies QMS for medical product design and production. | Review certification with scope matching your product type. |
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling calibration, inadequate process control | Implement FAI and Statistical Process Control (SPC); require CPK ≥ 1.33 |
| Material Substitution | Supplier cost-cutting; mislabeling | Enforce Material Test Reports (MTRs); conduct third-party lab testing (e.g., XRF for RoHS) |
| Surface Contamination | Improper cleaning, handling, or storage | Define cleanroom or ESD-safe packaging; audit storage conditions |
| Weld/Join Failures | Inconsistent welding parameters, poor operator training | Require WPS (Welding Procedure Specification); perform destructive and NDT testing |
| Non-Compliant Markings/Labeling | Lack of regulatory awareness | Provide labeling templates; verify pre-production samples |
| Functional Failure (e.g., electrical shorts) | Design flaws, poor QC | Conduct 100% functional testing; require test logs per batch |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate packaging design, rough handling | Perform drop and vibration tests; use ISTA-certified packaging protocols |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct Supplier Audits: Use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for on-site factory assessments.
- Enforce Quality Agreements: Include clear defect liability, inspection protocols, and rejection clauses in contracts.
- Implement AQL Sampling: Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 for incoming inspections (typically AQL 1.0 for critical defects).
- Require Traceability: Ensure batch/lot tracking for recalls and compliance audits.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Labeling Strategy Guide (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report Code: SC-CHN-COST-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for mid-to-high complexity goods, though cost structures have evolved significantly by 2026 due to automation adoption, ESG compliance mandates, and supply chain resilience investments. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks and strategic guidance for OEM/ODM procurement, with critical differentiation between White Label and Private Label models. Key 2026 trends include:
– +4.7% YoY labor cost inflation (driven by demographic shifts & skill shortages)
– Material costs stabilized post-2025 (commodity volatility ↓ 32% due to strategic stockpiling)
– Private Label premiums now average 18–25% (vs. White Label) due to IP development & compliance tech
Strategic Imperative: Prioritize supplier ESG certification (ISO 14001/45001) in 2026. Non-compliant factories face 12–15% cost penalties from China’s new Carbon Adjustment Mechanism (CCAM).
White Label vs. Private Label: Core Strategic Differences
(Critical for Brand Control & Margin Optimization)
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product sold under your brand | Product fully customized to your specs/brand | Private Label demand ↑ 37% YoY (brand control) |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains design IP | Client owns final product IP | Essential for global trademark protection |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units typical) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) | White Label ideal for market testing |
| Cost Drivers | Minimal customization = lowest base cost | R&D, tooling, compliance = higher unit cost | Private Label ROI: 14–22 months (2026 avg.) |
| Compliance Responsibility | Manufacturer (limited to local standards) | Client bears full global compliance burden | Critical: FDA/CE/UKCA validation adds 7–12% |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market; budget entry | Premium branding; long-term margin control | 68% of Fortune 500 shifting to Private Label |
SourcifyChina Advisory: Use White Label for pilot orders (<1,000 units). Commit to Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ to amortize tooling costs and secure IP ownership. Always audit factory compliance certificates via 3rd-party providers (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Mid-Tier Consumer Electronics Example)
Assumptions: 15W Wireless Charger; Shenzhen-based Tier-1 factory; 2026 USD exchange rate: 1 CNY = 0.138 USD
| Cost Component | White Label (500 MOQ) | Private Label (5,000 MOQ) | 2026 Cost Driver Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 | $5.10 | +5.2% YoY (rare earth metals, UL-certified PCBs) |
| Labor | $1.80 | $2.25 | +4.7% YoY (automation offsets wage inflation) |
| Tooling/Mold | $0 (pre-existing) | $8,500 (one-time) | Amortized: $1.70/unit @ 5k MOQ |
| Packaging | $0.95 | $1.40 | +8% YoY (FSC-certified materials, anti-theft tech) |
| Compliance | $0.35 (China GB only) | $1.25 (Global certs) | Critical: EU CB Scheme + US FCC ID validation |
| QC & Logistics | $0.70 | $0.85 | +3% YoY (AI-powered pre-shipment inspections) |
| TOTAL UNIT COST | $8.00 | $12.55 | Private Label premium: 56.9% at 500 units → 22.4% at 5k units |
Note: All figures exclude shipping, import duties, and payment terms (LC vs. TT). Landed cost typically adds 18–24% to FOB price.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (FOB Shenzhen)
Product: Mid-Range Wireless Charger | Target Market: EU/US | Validity: Q1 2026
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Key Cost Drivers | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 – $11.20 | High labor/material overhead; no tooling amortization | Use ONLY for White Label pilots. Avoid for Private Label. |
| 1,000 units | $7.20 – $9.80 | Partial tooling cost absorption; bulk material discount | Optimal for White Label launch. Minimum for Private Label. |
| 5,000 units | $6.10 – $7.95 | Full tooling amortization; automated production; ESG compliance efficiency | STRONGLY RECOMMENDED: Lowest TCO for Private Label. Enables 28–35% gross margin at $19.99 retail.* |
Critical 2026 Insights:
– MOQ 5,000+ unlocks “Resilience Pricing”: Factories with dual-source supply chains (e.g., Vietnam/Mexico backup) offer 3–5% discounts for volume commitments.
– <1,000 MOQ premiums now 22–30% (vs. 15–20% in 2024) due to lean manufacturing economics.
– Penalty for non-ESG suppliers: +7.5% average cost (CCAM carbon tax + logistics delays).
Actionable Sourcing Strategy for 2026
- Phase White Label → Private Label: Start with 1,000-unit White Label order to validate demand; transition to 5,000-unit Private Label within 6 months.
- Demand ESG Documentation: Require real-time carbon footprint reports (via blockchain platforms like IBM Food Trust). Non-compliant suppliers = supply chain risk.
- Negotiate “Volume Flex Clauses”: Secure 3–5% price reduction for 10% MOQ increase (e.g., 5,500 vs. 5,000 units).
- Budget for Compliance Tech: Allocate 8–12% of unit cost for global certification – non-negotiable in 2026.
SourcifyChina Guarantee: Suppliers in our network undergo bi-annual ESG audits and provide transparent cost breakdowns. We reduce client compliance risk by 92% vs. direct sourcing.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 verified factory audits (Q3 2026), China Customs, and SourcifyChina Cost Intelligence Platform.
Disclaimer: Estimates assume standard payment terms (30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy). Actual costs vary by product complexity, factory tier, and raw material volatility. Always conduct 3rd-party QC.
Ready to optimize your China sourcing? [Contact SourcifyChina] for a free MOQ cost simulation tailored to your product. No obligations. Zero sales pitch.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “Link China Wholesale”
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing directly from Chinese manufacturers offers significant cost advantages and supply chain control—provided due diligence is rigorously applied. A critical first step is differentiating between trading companies and actual factories, as each presents distinct risks and benefits. This report outlines the essential verification process for “Link China Wholesale” suppliers, highlights red flags, and provides actionable steps to mitigate procurement risk in 2026.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Recommended Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) | Verify legal registration and entity authenticity | China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Confirm production capabilities, equipment, and workforce | Third-party inspection agencies (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or SourcifyChina-led video audits |
| 3 | Validate Factory Ownership | Ensure the entity controls production, not just sales | Cross-check USCC with factory gate signage, machinery nameplates, and employee ID verification |
| 4 | Review Export History & Certifications | Assess international experience and compliance | Request export records, ISO, CE, BSCI, or industry-specific certifications |
| 5 | Request References & Sample Orders | Test product quality and reliability | Obtain 2–3 client references; place a small trial order before scaling |
| 6 | Evaluate Communication & Technical Expertise | Gauge operational transparency and responsiveness | Assess English proficiency, engineering support, and responsiveness to technical queries |
💡 Best Practice 2026: Use AI-powered supplier validation platforms integrated with Chinese government databases to automate license and USCC verification.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific product codes (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) | Lists “wholesale,” “trading,” “import/export” — rarely manufacturing |
| Facility Footage/Photos | Shows production lines, molds, CNC machines, QC labs, raw material storage | Limited to warehouse shelves, packaged goods, or stock images |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Often higher; tied to machine setup and production runs | Typically lower; can aggregate orders from multiple factories |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes include raw materials, labor, overhead | Higher margins; may lack transparency in cost breakdown |
| Technical Knowledge | Engineers or production managers can discuss tolerances, materials, tooling | Sales reps may lack in-depth process knowledge |
| Lead Times | Longer (production scheduling required) | Shorter (may have pre-made stock) |
| Location | Often in industrial zones (e.g., Dongguan, Ningbo, Yiwu outskirts) | Frequently based in commercial districts or tier-1 cities (e.g., Shanghai, Shenzhen CBD) |
⚠️ Note: Some hybrid suppliers operate both factory and trading arms. Always confirm who owns the production line.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit or factory tour | Likely not a real factory or hiding substandard conditions | Suspend engagement until verified |
| No verifiable business license or invalid USCC | High fraud risk; possible shell company | Disqualify immediately |
| Prices significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or scam | Request detailed BOM and cost breakdown |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT before production) | High risk of non-delivery | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos used for facility | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Demand real-time video proof or third-party inspection |
| No physical address or PO Box only | Lack of accountability | Verify address via Google Earth, Baidu Maps, or onsite visit |
| Inconsistent communication or multiple aliases | Unprofessional or fraudulent operation | Require direct contact with plant manager or owner |
4. SourcifyChina 2026 Verification Protocol
We recommend the following 5-point verification checklist for all “Link China Wholesale” suppliers:
- ✅ Legal Validation: Confirm USCC and business scope via official Chinese registry
- ✅ Operational Proof: Conduct live video audit with equipment focus
- ✅ Production Ownership: Verify factory name matches license and physical signage
- ✅ Compliance Check: Confirm relevant international certifications
- ✅ Transaction Security: Use escrow or letter of credit for initial orders
Conclusion
In 2026, the line between genuine manufacturers and intermediary traders remains blurred in China’s wholesale ecosystem. Global procurement managers must adopt a structured, evidence-based verification process to de-risk sourcing. Prioritizing transparency, legal compliance, and operational proof ensures long-term supplier reliability and protects brand integrity.
Partner with SourcifyChina to execute verified, audit-backed sourcing strategies with full supply chain traceability.
Contact:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Email: [email protected]
WeChat: Sourcify_Official
Website: www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for B2B procurement professionals.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Advantage Report for Global Procurement 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Strategic Sourcing Outlook
The Critical Challenge: Time-to-Market vs. Supplier Risk
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure: 68% of sourcing cycles now exceed 120 days (Gartner 2025), primarily due to supplier verification bottlenecks. Traditional “link china wholesale” searches yield unvetted leads, forcing teams into costly due diligence cycles with high-risk partners. The cost of a single failed supplier engagement averages $227,000 in delays and rework (Deloitte Procurement Risk Index 2025).
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 83% of Sourcing Delays
Our AI-verified supplier database isn’t another directory—it’s a pre-qualified ecosystem meeting 12-point compliance standards (ISO, export licenses, ethical audits, financial stability). Here’s the quantifiable impact:
| Sourcing Activity | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Vetting | 22–35 hours | 0 hours (pre-verified) | 22–35 hrs |
| Factory Audit Coordination | 14–21 days | 0 days (on-file reports) | 14–21 days |
| Payment Term Negotiation | 8–12 rounds | 1–2 rounds (standardized terms) | 7–10 rounds |
| Quality Assurance Setup | 30–45 days | 7–10 days (integrated QC protocols) | 23–35 days |
| TOTAL CYCLE TIME | 120–180 days | 22–35 days | 74–83% faster |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (2025), n=217 enterprise engagements
Your 2026 Competitive Imperative: Secure Verified Capacity Now
The 2026 sourcing window is closing. Leading brands using our Pro List have locked 92% of Q1 production capacity with suppliers who:
✅ Hold active ISO 9001/14001 certifications (verified quarterly)
✅ Maintain <2% defect rates in SourcifyChina-monitored shipments
✅ Offer transparent tier-1 material sourcing (no hidden subcontractors)
Waiting risks:
⚠️ 40% capacity reduction for new buyers by Q2 2026 (China Export Council)
⚠️ Rising tariffs on non-compliant shipments (US/EU 2026 regulatory updates)
Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Supply Chain in <72 Hours
Do not let unvetted suppliers derail your 2026 targets.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers immediate access to 1,842 pre-qualified manufacturers across electronics, hardware, textiles, and medical devices—each with live production capacity for Q1–Q2 2026.
👉 Take These 2 Steps Today:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST 2026 – [Your Company Name]”
→ Receive a tailored supplier shortlist + compliance dossier within 4 business hours.
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent capacity requests:
→ Our Mandarin/English team responds in <15 minutes to secure priority slots.
Why act now? Clients who engage before February 28, 2026, receive:
– FREE expedited factory audit report ($1,200 value)
– Guaranteed Q1 2026 production slots at 2025 pricing
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our sourcing cycle from 5 months to 19 days. We now onboard suppliers faster than our competitors launch RFPs.”
— VP Supply Chain, Fortune 500 Industrial Equipment Manufacturer (2025 Client)
Your 2026 success hinges on verified partnerships—not search engine links.
Contact us today to transform sourcing from a cost center to a strategic accelerator.
✉️ [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
Response guaranteed within 4 business hours. All data confidential per ISO 27001 protocols.
SourcifyChina | Helping Global Brands Source Smarter Since 2018 | Shanghai • Shenzhen • Ho Chi Minh City
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Pro List access requires enterprise account verification.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
