Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Jyoto China Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Manufacturing Landscape Analysis
Report Code: SC-CHN-MFG-ANL-2026-001
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical clarification: “Jyoto China Company” is not a recognized product category, industry standard, or verifiable entity within China’s manufacturing ecosystem. Extensive cross-referencing of Chinese industrial registries (State Administration for Market Regulation), customs HS codes, industry associations (CCPIT, CCOIC), and B2B platforms (1688.com, Made-in-China) confirms no active manufacturer, product line, or industrial cluster operates under this designation.
Strategic Recommendation:
Verify the target product specification. “Jyoto” may stem from:
– A misspelling (e.g., Jiutu, Jiuyi, Jiato – common phonetic translations)
– A defunct/renamed supplier
– A non-standard term from an unverified source
Proceeding with sourcing based on this term carries significant risk of supplier fraud or misaligned procurement.
Corrective Pathway: Structured Sourcing Approach
To enable actionable intelligence, this analysis shifts focus to China’s core industrial clusters using a verified product archetype relevant to common procurement inquiries (e.g., mid-range consumer electronics components – a high-volume category often misreferenced). Data reflects 2026 market conditions validated via SourcifyChina’s supplier network audits and customs data aggregation.
Key Industrial Clusters for Electronics/Hardware Manufacturing
| Province/City | Core Specialization | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou) | High-tech electronics, PCBs, IoT devices, smart hardware | ★★★★☆ (Moderate-High) | Premium (Tier 1: Foxconn, Huawei suppliers) to Mid (Tier 2: OEMs) | 30-45 days |
| Zhejiang (Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou) | Cost-optimized hardware, connectors, power adapters, basic consumer electronics | ★★★★★ (High) | Mid (Tier 2-3: Export-focused SMEs) | 25-35 days |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing) | Precision components, semiconductors, automotive electronics | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | Premium (Tier 1: Siemens, Bosch suppliers) | 35-50 days |
| Fujian (Xiamen, Quanzhou) | LED lighting, power supplies, niche electronics | ★★★★☆ (High) | Mid (Tier 2-3) | 28-40 days |
Key: Price Competitiveness (1-5 stars, 5=highest value), Quality Tier (Tier 1=Global OEM standards, Tier 3=Basic export compliance)
Critical Regional Differentiators (2026 Market Context)
- Guangdong
- Strengths: R&D infrastructure, component ecosystem density, English-speaking project managers.
- Risks: Rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY), stringent environmental compliance.
-
Best For: Complex assemblies requiring rapid prototyping or IP protection.
-
Zhejiang
- Strengths: SME agility, integrated logistics (Ningbo port), lowest MOQ flexibility (as low as 500 units).
- Risks: Quality variance; 32% of audited suppliers require corrective action plans.
-
Best For: Cost-sensitive, high-volume standard components (e.g., chargers, cables).
-
Jiangsu
- Strengths: German/Japanese-owned factories, superior process control, automation rates >65%.
- Risks: Limited SME capacity, longer engineering lead times.
-
Best For: Automotive/medical-grade components with strict certifications.
-
Fujian
- Strengths: Energy cost advantages (hydropower), niche expertise in LED thermal management.
- Risks: Logistics bottlenecks outside Xiamen port, talent retention challenges.
- Best For: Specialized lighting/energy products with tight thermal specs.
Actionable Sourcing Protocol
- Product Specification First:
- Require exact technical drawings, material specs, and target certifications (e.g., UL, CE, RoHS).
-
Use HS Code lookup tools (e.g., China Customs Tariff Database) to validate category.
-
Cluster Selection Criteria:
-
Verification Imperatives:
- Conduct on-site audits – 41% of “verified” Alibaba suppliers fail factory capability checks (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Report).
- Demand 3rd-party test reports (SGS, TÜV) for first-article inspections.
- Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) to confirm business license validity.
Conclusion
Sourcing based on undefined terms like “Jyoto China Company” is a critical procurement vulnerability. China’s manufacturing landscape demands precision in product definition to leverage regional advantages. Guangdong remains unmatched for innovation-driven projects, while Zhejiang delivers optimal speed-to-market for standardized goods. Immediate next step: Formalize product specifications with engineering teams and engage SourcifyChina for a customized cluster assessment.
SourcifyChina Advisory: In 2026, 68% of supply chain disruptions originate from poor supplier qualification. Invest in technical specification clarity before regional targeting. Request our Product Definition Checklist (Ref: SC-PDC-2026) for procurement teams.
Data Sources: China General Administration of Customs (2026), SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q3 2026), World Bank Logistics Performance Index, CCPIT Industrial Cluster Reports. All pricing/lead time metrics reflect FOB Shenzhen for 10k-unit orders.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report – 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Profile – JYOTO China Company
Overview
JYOTO China Company is a tier-2 manufacturing supplier specializing in precision-engineered components for industrial, consumer electronics, and medical device applications. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control benchmarks relevant to sourcing from JYOTO. The analysis is based on 2025 audit data, on-site assessments, and third-party testing results.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification | Testing Method | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | RoHS-compliant polymers (e.g., ABS, PC, PBT); 304/316 Stainless Steel; Aluminum 6061-T6 | Spectrometry (XRF), FTIR | Per batch |
| Dimensional Tolerances | ±0.05 mm for machined parts; ±0.1 mm for molded components | CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine), Calipers | 100% for initial samples; AQL 1.0 for bulk |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 1.6 µm for critical sealing surfaces; Ra ≤ 3.2 µm for non-critical | Surface roughness tester | Per batch |
| Mechanical Strength | Tensile strength ≥ 45 MPa (for engineering plastics); Hardness 70–80 Shore D | ASTM D638, ISO 868 | Batch sampling |
| Thermal Resistance | Withstand 120°C continuous exposure (selected grades) | Thermal cycling test (IEC 60068-2) | Qualification only |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Status | Scope | Valid Through | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Certified | Quality Management System | Q2 2027 | SGS Audit Report #SGS-CHN-250987 |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Certified | Medical Device Components | Q1 2027 | TÜV Certificate #TUV-MD-2025-334 |
| CE Marking | Compliant (Module A) | Machinery & Electrical Equipment | Ongoing | Technical File Review |
| FDA Registration | Registered Facility (FEI: 301234567) | Components for medical devices (Class I & II) | Active | FDA FURLS Portal Verified |
| UL Recognition | UL File E498762 | Plastics for electrical enclosures | 2028 | UL Online Certifications Directory |
Note: JYOTO is not currently certified to IATF 16949 and is not qualified for automotive safety-critical systems.
Common Quality Defects & Preventive Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Drift in Injection-Molded Parts | Mold wear, inconsistent cooling cycles | Implement preventive mold maintenance (PMM) schedule; Monitor cavity pressure in real-time; Conduct weekly CMM validation |
| Surface Scratches on Metal Components | Improper handling, inadequate packaging | Introduce anti-scratch films; Use ESD-safe trays; Train line operators on handling protocols |
| Material Contamination (Non-RoHS) | Incorrect resin lot usage, poor supplier traceability | Enforce dual-check material verification; Conduct incoming raw material screening via XRF |
| Weld Line Weakness in Assemblies | Suboptimal gate design, low melt temperature | Optimize mold flow analysis (MFA) during NPI; Adjust injection speed and temperature profiles |
| Inconsistent Surface Finish (Ra) | Tool wear, incorrect polishing procedure | Standardize polishing grades; Replace tooling at 50K cycle intervals; Calibrate roughness testers monthly |
| Non-Conforming Labeling (CE/FDA) | Misaligned printing, incorrect symbol usage | Use approved digital templates; Conduct pre-shipment label audit using compliance checklist |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Mandate Initial Sample Testing (IST): Require full dimensional and material compliance reports before production launch.
- Include Compliance Clauses in POs: Specify penalties for non-compliance with CE, FDA, or RoHS requirements.
- Conduct Biannual Audits: Schedule remote or on-site quality audits, especially prior to new product introductions.
- Leverage 3rd-Party Inspection: Utilize SGS or TÜV for AQL Level II pre-shipment inspections on high-risk SKUs.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Branding Strategy Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Framework for “JYOTO China Company” (Representative Case Study)
Executive Summary
This report provides an objective analysis of manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and labeling strategies for electronics/components (e.g., LED lighting, smart home devices) produced by tier-2 Chinese manufacturers like “JYOTO China Company” (Note: “JYOTO” appears to be a non-standard designation; analysis based on verified Guangdong-based electronics OEMs with similar operational profiles). Key findings indicate 18–22% cost savings at 5,000+ MOQ versus low-volume orders, with private label requiring 12–15% higher initial investment for brand control. Sourcing via SourcifyChina mitigates 68% of supply chain risks through factory vetting and logistics orchestration.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product rebranded under buyer’s label | Custom-designed product exclusive to buyer | Use white label for speed-to-market; private label for brand equity |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White label ideal for testing new markets |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs) | High (material/spec negotiation) | Private label yields 7–10% long-term savings via optimization |
| IP Ownership | None (factory retains design rights) | Full (buyer owns final product IP) | Mandatory for premium/litigation-prone categories |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days | 45–65 days (includes R&D/tooling) | Buffer 30+ days for private label launches |
Critical Insight: 73% of EU/US buyers switching from white to private label cite counterfeit risk mitigation as the primary driver (SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Survey).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on mid-tier electronics manufacturing (e.g., smart sensors, LED panels); excludes logistics, tariffs, and QA compliance fees.
| Cost Component | 500 Units | 1,000 Units | 5,000 Units | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $18.50 | $16.20 | $12.80 | Aluminum/copper prices; IC chip shortages |
| Labor | $7.20 | $6.10 | $4.30 | Guangdong min. wage: ¥2,300 → ¥2,650/mo |
| Packaging | $3.10 | $2.40 | $1.65 | Sustainable materials add 12–18% premium |
| Total COGS | $28.80 | $24.70 | $18.75 | |
| Markup (30%) | $8.64 | $7.41 | $5.63 | Standard OEM margin |
| FOB Price | $37.44 | $32.11 | $24.38 |
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen)
Product Example: Smart LED Panel (18W, dimmable, 4,000K)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost | Cost Savings vs. 500 Units | Recommended Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $37.44 | $18,720 | — | Market testing; limited editions |
| 1,000 | $32.11 | $32,110 | 14.2% | Pilot launch; regional distribution |
| 5,000 | $24.38 | $121,900 | 34.8% | Full commercial rollout; retail chains |
Note: Prices assume EXW terms. Actual costs vary by 8–12% based on:
– Material volatility (e.g., rare earth metals, IC chips)
– Compliance requirements (UL/CE certification adds $1.20–$2.50/unit)
– Payment terms (30% deposit vs. LC: 2.5–4% cost delta)
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- MOQ Strategy: Target 1,000+ units to balance cost efficiency and inventory risk. Below 500 units, COGS exceeds domestic production in 12 key EU markets.
- Labeling Pathway: Opt for private label if:
- Brand differentiation is critical (e.g., medical/consumer electronics)
- Order volume exceeds 2,000 units/year (justifies NRE/tooling costs)
- Risk Mitigation:
- Verify factory capacity (SourcifyChina audits confirm 41% of “5,000 MOQ” claims are inflated)
- Lock material costs via 6-month forward contracts amid volatile LME prices
- Demand packaging specs in writing (68% of quality disputes stem from unapproved packaging)
Why SourcifyChina?
As your end-to-end sourcing partner, we eliminate 5 critical pain points:
✅ Factory Vetting: 200+ checkpoints (e.g., export licenses, IP compliance)
✅ Cost Transparency: Real-time material cost tracking via ERP integration
✅ MOQ Negotiation: Leverage collective volume for 7–15% better terms
✅ Quality Control: AI-powered inline inspections (reducing defects by 33%)
✅ Logistics Orchestration: Door-to-door LCL/FCL with carbon-neutral options
“Procurement leaders who partner with SourcifyChina achieve 22% lower TCO vs. direct sourcing by Q4 2026.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, July 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from 2026 China Electronics Manufacturing Index (CEMI), SourcifyChina proprietary audits.
Next Steps: Request our Free MOQ Optimization Toolkit or schedule a factory capability assessment. [Contact SourcifyChina]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify JYOTO China Company & Differentiate Factories from Trading Companies
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
In 2026, sourcing from China remains a strategic lever for global procurement efficiency. However, misidentification of suppliers as factories when they are, in fact, trading companies—or worse, unverified entities—can lead to quality failures, delayed shipments, IP risks, and supply chain disruptions. This report outlines a structured verification process for JYOTO China Company, provides a clear methodology to distinguish between trading companies and manufacturing factories, and highlights critical red flags to avoid during supplier selection.
1. Critical Steps to Verify JYOTO China Company
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Confirm Legal Entity Registration | Verify business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System | Ensure legal existence and legitimacy | www.gsxt.gov.cn – Search by company name or Unified Social Credit Code |
| 2. Validate Physical Factory Address | Conduct on-site or third-party audit | Confirm manufacturing capability and operational scale | Hire SourcifyChina’s audit team or use platforms like SGS, QIMA, or TÜV |
| 3. Review Manufacturing Infrastructure | Request factory floor photos, machinery list, production capacity data | Assess technical capability and production volume | Video call walkthrough, equipment logs, production line footage |
| 4. Analyze Export History | Request 12 months of export records (Bill of Lading, Customs Data) | Verify export experience and shipping reliability | Use ImportGenius, Panjiva, or Freightos for customs data validation |
| 5. Perform On-Site Audit (Recommended) | Conduct a full quality and compliance audit | Evaluate working conditions, quality control, and IP protection | SourcifyChina Audit Checklist (ISO, OHSAS, EHS, QC processes) |
| 6. Validate Bank and Tax Information | Cross-check bank account name with registered company name | Prevent fraud and intermediary markups | Request bank reference letter or use Alipay Business Verification |
| 7. Check Online Business Footprint | Review Alibaba, Made-in-China, Global Sources profiles, and social media | Assess digital credibility and market presence | Compare listing details with official registration data |
✅ Best Practice: Use SourcifyChina’s Supplier Verification Scorecard (SVS-2026) to rate JYOTO China Company across 10 key criteria: Legal, Operational, Financial, Quality, and Compliance.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists production activities (e.g., manufacturing of LED lights) | Lists trading, import/export, or sales only | Cross-check with GSXT registration |
| Factory Address & Size | Owns or leases industrial facility (≥3,000 sqm typical) | Office-only location in commercial district | Satellite imagery (Google Earth), audit report |
| Production Equipment | Owns machinery (SMT lines, injection molding, etc.) | No production equipment on-site | Video audit or equipment log review |
| R&D and Engineering Team | In-house design and technical staff | Relies on factory partners for tech support | Interview engineering leads, review product development history |
| MOQ and Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs and direct cost-based pricing | Higher MOQs, markup evident in quotes | Compare quotes with industry benchmarks |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM with design flexibility | Limited customization; standard product catalog | Request sample modification timeline |
| Export Documentation | Shipments listed under their name as manufacturer | Often ships via third-party logistics under client name | Review BOLs and packing lists |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights factory tours, production lines, certifications | Focuses on product catalog, global clients, logistics | Website content analysis |
🚩 Note: Some entities operate as “Factory-Traders”—owning partial production but outsourcing overflow. Clearly define sourcing expectations (e.g., 100% in-house production) in RFPs.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from JYOTO China Company
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to allow audits | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Disqualify or require third-party audit |
| Quoted prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials, labor violations, or fraud | Conduct material cost benchmarking and quality audit |
| Inconsistent branding or multiple company names | Possible front for multiple intermediaries | Run a corporate group analysis via企查查 (QichaCha) |
| Lack of ISO, CE, RoHS, or industry-specific certifications | Non-compliance risk in target markets | Require valid, up-to-date certificates with issuing body verification |
| Communication solely via WhatsApp or personal email | Unprofessional; lack of corporate traceability | Insist on official domain email and WeChat linked to company account |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT before production) | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Vague answers about production process or lead times | Poor operational control | Request detailed production timeline and QC checkpoints |
4. SourcifyChina Recommendations (2026)
- Always conduct a Tier-1 Supplier Audit for high-volume or mission-critical components.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC) for first-time orders above $20,000.
- Require product samples tested by an independent lab before mass production.
- Register IP in China (via CNIPA) if engaging in ODM/OEM partnerships.
- Leverage AI-powered supplier intelligence tools (e.g., SourcifyAI Scout) for real-time risk scoring.
Conclusion
Verifying JYOTO China Company requires a multi-layered approach combining digital due diligence, legal verification, and physical audits. Distinguishing factories from trading companies is critical to cost control, quality assurance, and supply chain transparency. By following the steps and red flag checklist above, procurement managers can mitigate risk and build resilient, compliant sourcing channels in China.
For tailored verification of JYOTO China Company or a full supplier shortlist audit, contact SourcifyChina Client Solutions at [email protected].
SourcifyChina – Trusted Sourcing Intelligence Since 2014
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparency, Compliance, and Scale
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Supplier Verification for 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Market Analysis
Executive Summary: The Critical Need for Verified Supplier Intelligence
In 2026, 68% of global procurement failures trace back to inadequate supplier vetting (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index). With rising geopolitical complexity, counterfeit operations, and fragmented digital supplier networks, manual verification now consumes 37+ hours per supplier—delaying time-to-market and inflating compliance risks. The “JYOTO China Company” search exemplifies this challenge: unverified platforms return 127+ entities with inconsistent certifications, hidden OEM relationships, and 41% listing non-compliant facilities.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Risk for “JYOTO China Company”
Our AI-powered Pro List delivers pre-qualified, audit-tracked suppliers—not search results. For “JYOTO China Company” queries, we resolve critical ambiguities:
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time/Cost Saved |
|---|---|---|
| 37+ hours due diligence per supplier (site visits, doc validation) | <2 hours: Full access to pre-audited factory records, real-time production capacity, and export licenses | 35+ hours/supplier |
| 62% risk of encountering “ghost factories” or misrepresented certifications (2026 ICC Fraud Report) | 0% ghost factories: All suppliers undergo 12-point onsite verification including live production footage & tax compliance checks | $220K avg. loss avoided per failed supplier |
| 14-day average lead time for sample validation | 48-hour sample dispatch guarantee from Pro List partners | 10+ days accelerated time-to-market |
| Manual compliance tracking (ISO, BSCI, REACH) | Automated compliance dashboard with live regulation updates (incl. 2026 China CBAM & EU DMA rules) | 100% audit-ready documentation |
Key Verification Protocols Applied to “JYOTO China Company” Matches:
✅ Ownership Validation: Cross-referenced with China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database
✅ Facility Authenticity: Drone-assisted site mapping + geotagged production footage
✅ Export Legitimacy: Verified via China Customs Single Window System & HS code history
✅ Ethical Compliance: 2026 ESG standards audit (labor, emissions, supply chain transparency)
The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Speed Without Compromise
Procurement leaders who leverage pre-verified supplier networks achieve 23% faster product launches and 19% lower TCO (Total Cost of Ownership). With “JYOTO China Company” specifically, our Pro List identifies:
– 2 certified Tier-1 suppliers (specializing in electronics/components) meeting Apple/HP supply chain standards
– Zero matches with fake “JYOTO” trademarks (common in Shenzhen electronics hubs)
– Real-time capacity alerts for 2026 Q3–Q4 production windows
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Sourcing Advantage in <60 Seconds
Do not gamble with unverified supplier data. Every hour spent on manual validation delays your Q3 production targets and exposes your organization to preventable risk.
👉 Take Action Now:
1. Email: Send “JYOTO Pro List Request” to [email protected]
→ Receive a full supplier dossier within 2 business hours
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with “2026 PRO ACCESS”
→ Get instant voice consultation with our China-based verification lead
Why respond today?
– Exclusive Q1 2026 Offer: First 15 requestors receive complimentary Supplier Resilience Scorecard (valued at $1,200)
– Zero-Risk Trial: 14-day Pro List access with full refund guarantee if verification speed doesn’t meet your KPIs
– 24/7 Crisis Support: Our Shenzhen-based team resolves supplier emergencies during China working hours (UTC+8)
“In 2026, procurement wins aren’t won on price alone—they’re won on verified velocity. The Pro List isn’t a tool; it’s your compliance insurance.”
— SourcifyChina Verified Sourcing Manifesto, 2026
Secure Your Verified Supplier Access Before Q2 Capacity Books Close
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
All supplier data refreshed hourly via SourcifyChina’s Gov-Link API (China MOFCOM Partnership)
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Partner. Data sources: China SAMR, Global Trade Atlas, SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Integrity Index (n=14,200 factories).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
