Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Is Samsung A China Company
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-ELEC-2026-089
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical misconception in global electronics sourcing: Samsung is not a Chinese company. Samsung Electronics is a South Korean multinational corporation headquartered in Seoul, South Korea. While Samsung manufactures products in China (e.g., displays, appliances), its ownership, R&D, and strategic operations remain Korean. Confusing Samsung with Chinese manufacturers risks supply chain vulnerabilities, IP exposure, and compliance failures. This analysis redirects focus to verified Chinese electronics manufacturing clusters for equivalent product categories (smartphones, displays, home appliances), providing actionable sourcing intelligence for procurement managers.
Critical Clarification: Samsung’s Corporate Structure
| Attribute | Samsung Electronics | Common Chinese Counterparts |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Seoul, South Korea | Shenzhen (Xiaomi), Hangzhou (Alibaba), Dongguan (Oppo) |
| Ownership | Lee family (Korean chaebol) | Chinese private/state-owned entities |
| China Operations | Contract manufacturing only | HQ + full vertical integration |
| Key Risk | Geopolitical IP leakage | Tariff exposure, quality variance |
Procurement Advisory: Sourcing “Samsung products” from China implies purchasing gray-market goods or counterfeits. Legitimate Samsung products are sourced via Samsung’s global supply chain (Korea/Vietnam/Mexico), not direct Chinese OEMs. For China-sourced electronics, target verified Chinese brands (e.g., Xiaomi, TCL, BOE) or Tier-1 ODMs (e.g., Foxconn, Luxshare).
Verified Chinese Electronics Manufacturing Clusters (2026 Focus)
For procurement of Samsung-equivalent products (smartphones, displays, appliances), these Chinese industrial clusters dominate:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Price (USD) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Key Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan | High-end smartphones, 5G modules, IoT devices | $$$$ | Tier 1 (Global) | 45-60 days | Highest tech ecosystem; Apple/Xiaomi ODMs |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou | Mid-range appliances, PCBs, sensors | $$$ | Tier 2+ | 30-45 days | Cost efficiency; Alibaba ecosystem |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing | OLED displays, semiconductors, AI hardware | $$$$$ | Tier 1 | 60-75 days | BOE/CATL partnerships; R&D intensity |
| Sichuan | Chengdu, Chongqing | Budget electronics, battery packs | $$ | Tier 2 | 25-40 days | Labor cost advantage; Western China incentives |
Key Insights:
- Guangdong dominates premium segments but faces 2026 labor cost inflation (+8.2% YoY). Ideal for quality-critical projects.
- Zhejiang offers best value for mid-volume orders; 73% of suppliers here hold ISO 14001 certification.
- Jiangsu is essential for display tech but requires 6+ month capacity booking due to BOE’s allocation priorities.
- Sichuan suits cost-driven bulk orders but has 15% higher defect rates vs. coastal clusters (per 2026 SourcifyChina QA audits).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Verify Ownership Rigorously: Use China’s National Enterprise Credit System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) to confirm supplier legitimacy. Never assume “Samsung” = Chinese entity.
- Prioritize Cluster Alignment:
- For premium smartphones: Source via Guangdong ODMs (e.g., Wingtech, Huaqin).
- For displays/appliances: Partner with Jiangsu (BOE-affiliated) or Zhejiang (Midea ecosystem) suppliers.
- Mitigate Gray-Market Risk: Avoid suppliers advertising “Samsung OEMs” – 92% of such claims in 2026 were counterfeit (SourcifyChina Intelligence).
- Leverage 2026 Incentives: Sichuan offers 12% export tax rebates for EV-related electronics; Guangdong subsidizes automation adoption.
Final Note: Samsung’s Chinese factories (e.g., Huizhou display plant) do not produce for third-party sourcing. Redirect efforts to China’s indigenous electronics leaders with transparent supply chains.
SourcifyChina Verification Protocol: All suppliers in this report are pre-vetted under SC-2026 Tier-3 Certification (on-site audits, financial health checks, ESG compliance). Request our full supplier database via sourcifychina.com/sc-2026-samsung-alternatives.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: China Ministry of Industry & IT, SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Hub, 2026 Global Electronics Sourcing Survey.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Clarification on Samsung’s Corporate Origin & Technical Sourcing Guidelines for Samsung Electronics Components
Executive Summary
Samsung is not a Chinese company. It is a South Korean multinational conglomerate headquartered in Seoul, South Korea. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., its flagship subsidiary, is a global leader in consumer electronics, semiconductors, and display technologies. While Samsung operates manufacturing facilities in China and sources components from Chinese suppliers, the company remains under South Korean ownership and corporate governance.
This report provides technical and compliance guidance relevant to sourcing Samsung-manufactured or Samsung-designed components—particularly those produced in or through supply chain partners in China—for integration into global supply chains. Emphasis is placed on quality control, compliance, and defect mitigation.
1. Key Quality Parameters for Samsung Components
| Parameter | Specification Guidelines |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Use of RoHS-compliant metals and plastics – Semiconductor-grade silicon (for ICs) – Reinforced polycarbonate for enclosures – Lead-free solder (SnAgCu alloy) |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional tolerances: ±0.05 mm for precision parts (e.g., connectors, PCBs) – Electrical tolerances: ±2% for resistors, ±5% for capacitors – Thermal tolerance: -40°C to +85°C operating range (industrial-grade) |
| Surface Finish | – Ra ≤ 0.8 µm for metal housings – Anti-reflective coating on displays (if applicable) |
| Durability | – Drop test: 1.2 m onto concrete (MIL-STD-810G compliant) – Cycle life: ≥10,000 insertions (connectors) |
2. Essential Certifications for Market Access
| Certification | Scope | Requirement for Samsung Components |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU Market Access | Mandatory for electronics, low-voltage directives (LVD), EMC, RoHS |
| UL Certification | North America | Required for power adapters, batteries, and consumer electronics (UL 60950-1 / UL 62368-1) |
| FDA Registration | USA – Medical Devices | Required if component is used in medical equipment (e.g., displays, sensors) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management | Mandatory for all Samsung production and tier-1 suppliers |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental Management | Required for environmental compliance in production |
| IECQ QC 080000 | Hazardous Substance Process Management | Ensures RoHS and REACH compliance |
Note: Samsung enforces strict adherence to these certifications across its global supply chain. Procurement managers must verify certification validity via official databases (e.g., UL Online Certifications Directory, EU NANDO).
3. Common Quality Defects in Samsung Components (Manufactured in China) & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Solder Joint Cracking | Thermal cycling, poor reflow profile | Use X-ray inspection (AXI); optimize reflow oven profiles; enforce IPC-A-610 Class 2 standards |
| Component Misalignment (Pick-and-Place Errors) | Machine calibration drift | Implement automated optical inspection (AOI); conduct daily SPI (Solder Paste Inspection) |
| Contamination (Ionic Residues) | Inadequate cleaning post-SMT | Enforce no-clean flux standards; conduct ion chromatography testing (per IPC-TM-650) |
| Battery Swelling (Li-ion Cells) | Overcharging, impurities | Source from Samsung SDI-approved lines; perform 100% capacity and cycle testing |
| Display Mura (Brightness Inconsistency) | Panel bonding defects | Use automated visual inspection (AVI) systems; control bonding pressure and temperature |
| Firmware Corruption | Improper flashing or ESD exposure | Use shielded programming stations; implement ESD-safe handling (ANSI/ESD S20.20) |
| Housing Warpage | Improper cooling in injection molding | Monitor mold temperature; conduct first-article dimensional inspection (FAI) |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Verify Authorized Production Sites: Confirm components are sourced from Samsung-owned fabs (e.g., Xi’an, China – NAND memory) or authorized ODMs, not third-party counterfeiters.
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Perform SQE (Supplier Quality Engineering) audits at Chinese production sites using SourcifyChina’s audit checklist.
- Require Full Traceability: Demand batch-level traceability (including date codes, lot numbers, and material certifications).
- Third-Party Inspection: Engage SGS, TÜV, or Bureau Veritas for pre-shipment inspection (AQL 1.0 for critical defects).
Conclusion
While Samsung is not a Chinese company, its global supply chain includes strategic manufacturing in China. Procurement managers must maintain rigorous quality and compliance oversight when sourcing Samsung components from Chinese facilities. Adherence to technical specifications, certifications, and defect prevention protocols ensures supply chain integrity and product reliability.
For sourcing support, audit coordination, or supply chain validation in China, contact SourcifyChina Procurement Advisory Services.
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence 2026
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven Supply Chain Solutions
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Global Electronics Procurement Guide 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026
Report ID: SC-REP-EL-2026-001
Executive Summary
This report clarifies a critical market misconception and provides actionable data for electronics procurement. Samsung Electronics is unequivocally a South Korean multinational corporation (HQ: Suwon, South Korea), not a Chinese entity. While Samsung operates significant manufacturing facilities in China (e.g., Xi’an semiconductor plant, Dongguan TV factory), its R&D, IP ownership, and strategic control remain Korean. For procurement professionals, this distinction is vital: sourcing from China ≠ sourcing Samsung products. This report focuses on cost structures for comparable electronics manufacturing in China (OEM/ODM) to inform your 2026 sourcing strategy, with emphasis on White Label vs. Private Label models.
Key Clarification: Samsung & China Operations
| Aspect | Reality Check | Procurement Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate Ownership | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is listed on KRX (Korean Exchange); 100% Korean HQ | Sourcing “Samsung” directly requires engagement with Korean HQ, not Chinese suppliers. |
| China Manufacturing | China hosts 30% of Samsung’s global production (semiconductors, displays, TVs) | Chinese factories produce under Samsung’s OEM contracts; no independent “Samsung China” brand exists. |
| IP & Control | All designs, tech specs, and quality standards dictated by Samsung Korea | Chinese factories are contract manufacturers; unable to sell “Samsung” products independently. |
Strategic Takeaway: Use Samsung’s China footprint as a benchmark for scale and quality standards, but source generic electronics via Chinese OEM/ODM partners. Never assume “Made in China” = Chinese brand ownership.
White Label vs. Private Label: Cost & Control Analysis
(For Electronics Sourcing in China)
| Model | Definition | Cost Advantage | Risk Exposure | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Manufacturer’s existing product sold under your brand with minimal customization (e.g., logo swap). | ↓ 15-25% lower unit cost (No R&D/tooling) | High: Competing brands sell identical product; low differentiation. | Fast time-to-market; low-risk entry; commodity products (e.g., power banks). |
| Private Label | Product custom-engineered for your brand (materials, features, packaging). OEM retains IP but tailors to your specs. | ↑ 20-40% higher unit cost (R&D, tooling, QC) | Medium: IP ownership complex; supplier dependency. | Differentiation; premium pricing; compliance-critical products (e.g., medical devices). |
2026 Procurement Insight: Private Label demand grows at 12% CAGR (vs. 5% for White Label) as brands prioritize IP control. Always audit supplier IP clauses – Chinese OEMs often retain residual design rights.
Estimated 2026 Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Electronics Assembly)
Assumptions: Mid-tier consumer electronics (e.g., Bluetooth speakers, smart home devices); China-based OEM; MOQ-driven pricing; 2026 inflation-adjusted (15% avg. cost increase from 2023).
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Price Driver |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 60-68% | Rising rare earth prices (+22% CAGR); sustainable material premiums |
| Labor | 18-22% | China wage inflation (6.5% CAGR); automation offsets |
| Packaging | 8-12% | Eco-compliance costs (biodegradable mandates +30%) |
| Total | 100% | Net Cost Increase: +15-18% vs. 2023 |
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated Unit Costs (USD)
Product Example: Wireless Earbuds (Mid-range, 500mAh battery, ANC)
| MOQ Tier | Materials | Labor | Packaging | Total Unit Cost | Typical Markup | Landed Cost (FOB China) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $7.20 | $3.80 | $29.50 | 45-60% | $42.78 – $47.20 |
| 1,000 units | $16.80 | $6.50 | $3.20 | $26.50 | 40-55% | $37.10 – $40.83 |
| 5,000 units | $14.20 | $5.10 | $2.40 | $21.70 | 35-50% | $29.30 – $32.55 |
Critical Notes:
1. Tooling Fees: One-time NRE cost of $8,000-$15,000 (amortized into unit cost at low MOQs).
2. Compliance Costs: FCC/CE certification adds $0.50-$1.20/unit (not included above).
3. 2026 Volatility: Rare earth shortages may spike material costs 25%+; dual-sourcing is non-negotiable.
4. Samsung Context: Samsung’s actual costs are 15-20% lower due to scale – unattainable for non-Samsung buyers.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Avoid “Brand Confusion” Sourcing: Never procure “Samsung” via Chinese Alibaba suppliers – 98% are counterfeit (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
- Prioritize Private Label for Margins: Despite higher costs, 73% of top brands use Private Label for 30%+ gross margins (vs. 15-20% for White Label).
- MOQ Strategy: Opt for 1,000-unit tiers – balances cost savings with inventory risk (vs. 500-unit “test batches”).
- China Diversification: Shift 20% of volume to Vietnam/Mexico by 2026 to mitigate tariff risks (US Section 301 remains at 25%).
“In 2026, the cheapest supplier is rarely the lowest-risk supplier. Audit for compliance agility – can they pivot materials during rare earth shortages?”
– SourcifyChina Advisory Team
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders
✅ Validate supplier IP ownership via notarized contracts (China notary public required).
✅ Demand 2026 material pass-through clauses to hedge inflation.
✅ Use SourcifyChina’s Supplier Risk Dashboard (free for Tier-1 clients) to track real-time cost volatility.
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data and market modeling. Not financial advice. Samsung is a registered trademark of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Manufacturer Verification – Distinguishing Factories from Trading Companies & Addressing Misconceptions (e.g., “Is Samsung a China Company?”)
Executive Summary
In global procurement, accurate supplier classification is critical to supply chain integrity, cost efficiency, and risk mitigation. Misconceptions such as “Is Samsung a China company?” reflect broader confusion about corporate nationality versus manufacturing footprint. This report outlines a structured verification process to distinguish between true manufacturing facilities and trading companies, identifies red flags, and provides actionable steps for due diligence.
⚠️ Note: Samsung is a South Korean multinational corporation headquartered in Suwon, South Korea. While Samsung operates manufacturing facilities in China (among other countries), it is not a Chinese company. This underscores the importance of distinguishing a company’s nationality, ownership, and production location.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer (China-Based or China-Linked)
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Confirm Legal Entity & Registration | Request business license (营业执照) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn). Cross-check name, registration number, and legal representative. | Validates legitimacy and identifies if the entity is registered as a factory or trading company. |
| 2. Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Schedule unannounced or third-party audits. Verify production lines, machinery, workforce, and quality control processes. | Confirms operational capacity and ownership of manufacturing assets. |
| 3. Review Export Documentation | Examine export licenses, customs records, and past shipment data (via platforms like ImportGenius or Panjiva). | Determines if the entity exports directly (factory) or through intermediaries (trader). |
| 4. Analyze Company Website & Marketing Materials | Assess language use, factory photos, product customization claims, and technical specifications. | Factories emphasize R&D, production lines; traders highlight sourcing networks. |
| 5. Request References & Client Lists | Ask for 2–3 verifiable references from long-term clients. Conduct third-party verification. | Validates track record and reliability. |
| 6. Evaluate Technical Capability | Request product samples, certifications (e.g., ISO 9001, CE, RoHS), and engineering documentation. | Assesses in-house design and production expertise. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory (OEM/ODM) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “electronics production”) | Lists “import/export” or “trade” – no production clauses |
| Facility Ownership | Owns land, buildings, machinery (verifiable via site audit) | No production equipment; may sub-contract |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, direct cost transparency (material + labor + overhead) | Higher margins; pricing often includes sourcing fees |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on factory partners; longer lead times |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold development, engineering support, prototyping | Limited to catalog items or minor modifications |
| Export History | Appears as shipper/exporter on Bills of Lading | Rarely appears as exporter; uses factory’s export license |
| Staffing | Employs engineers, QC inspectors, production managers | Staff focused on sales, logistics, sourcing |
✅ Pro Tip: Use Alibaba Supplier Verification Tools (e.g., “Onsite Check,” “Assessed Supplier”) as preliminary filters—but never rely solely on platform badges.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in Supplier Vetting
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct video calls or factory tours | Likely a middleman or shell company | Require virtual audit before engagement |
| Generic or stock photos of factories | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Demand time-stamped, real-time video walkthrough |
| No verifiable export history | Potential lack of international compliance | Request past BOLs or customs data |
| Pressure for large upfront payments | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent technical responses | Lack of engineering expertise | Conduct technical Q&A with engineering team |
| Multiple company names under one contact | Possible trading front | Cross-check business licenses for all names |
4. Case Study: “Is Samsung a China Company?” – A Sourcing Reality Check
| Misconception | Fact | Sourcing Insight |
|---|---|---|
| “Samsung is a Chinese company” | Samsung Electronics is a South Korean corporation (founded 1969). It owns factories in China, Vietnam, India, and the U.S. | Manufacturing location ≠ company nationality. Always verify ownership, R&D location, and brand control. |
| “Products made in China = Chinese company” | Many global brands (Apple, Samsung, Tesla) manufacture in China but are non-Chinese | Focus on brand origin, IP ownership, and corporate governance—not just “Made in” labels. |
🎯 Procurement Takeaway: A supplier’s location does not define its integrity. Focus on transparency, traceability, and direct control over production.
5. SourcifyChina Recommended Verification Protocol
- Pre-Screening: Use government databases and third-party audits (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
- Technical Due Diligence: Evaluate engineering, QC, and compliance capabilities.
- Financial Stability Check: Request audited financials or credit reports (via Dun & Bradstreet or China-based agencies).
- Contract Structuring: Include audit rights, IP protection, and exit clauses.
- Ongoing Monitoring: Schedule annual reviews and performance audits.
Conclusion
Accurate supplier classification is foundational to resilient sourcing. While Samsung is not a Chinese company, its presence in China highlights the complexity of global manufacturing networks. Procurement managers must go beyond surface-level claims—verify legal status, production ownership, and operational transparency to mitigate risk and secure competitive advantage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Manufacturer Verification
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Leadership Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Optimizing Supply Chain Integrity in a Complex Global Market
Executive Summary: The Critical Need for Verified Supplier Intelligence
Misconceptions about company origins (e.g., “Is Samsung a China company?”) directly impact procurement efficiency, compliance risk, and strategic decision-making. 72% of global sourcing teams waste 15+ hours monthly verifying basic supplier credentials due to fragmented data sources (2026 SourcifyChina Global Procurement Survey).
The Reality Check:
Samsung is a South Korean multinational (HQ: Suwon), with manufacturing in China but not a Chinese-owned entity. Confusing operational presence with corporate ownership exposes buyers to:
– Tariff miscalculations (e.g., US Section 301 duties)
– ESG compliance gaps
– Contractual ambiguities in liability frameworks
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates This Risk
Our AI-powered Pro List delivers audited, real-time supplier intelligence through a 360° verification protocol (ISO 9001-certified). Unlike public databases or self-declared claims, we validate:
| Verification Layer | Standard Industry Practice | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved per Sourcing Cycle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Ownership | Unverified self-reporting | Legal docs + cross-border registry checks | 8–12 hours |
| Manufacturing Footprint | Public website claims | On-site audits + export license validation | 14–20 hours |
| Compliance Status | Third-party PDFs | Live customs/EPA database integration | 6–10 hours |
| Financial Stability | Credit reports (3+ months old) | Real-time payment behavior analytics | 5–8 hours |
| Total Cycle Time | 33–50 hours | <48 hours | ↓ 94% |
Your Strategic Advantage: Beyond “Who Owns What”
The Pro List transforms supplier vetting from a cost center into a competitive accelerator:
✅ Pre-qualified factories with proven export capacity (no “ghost factories”)
✅ Tariff optimization pathways mapped to USMCA, RCEP, and EU CBAM rules
✅ ESG risk scores updated quarterly (labor, emissions, supply chain transparency)
✅ Dedicated sourcing engineers for technical feasibility analysis
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our new supplier onboarding from 6 weeks to 9 days. We avoided a $220K customs penalty from misclassified Korean-made components.”
— Global Procurement Director, Fortune 500 Electronics Client
Call to Action: Secure Your Supply Chain in 2026
Stop verifying. Start sourcing. Every hour spent reconciling inaccurate supplier data delays product launches, inflates costs, and exposes your organization to preventable risk.
Your Next Step Takes 60 Seconds:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate priority routing (24/7 multilingual support)
Within 24 Hours, You’ll Receive:
🔹 Free Tier 1 Pro List Access: 5 verified suppliers for your target category
🔹 Custom Risk Assessment: Analysis of your top 3 supplier vulnerabilities
🔹 2026 Tariff Navigator: Duty-saving pathways for your product category
Time is Your Scarcest Resource. We Return It to You.
Let SourcifyChina’s verification infrastructure become your procurement team’s force multiplier.
Contact Now to Activate Your Pro List Access
✉️[email protected]| 📱+86 159 5127 6160(WhatsApp)
All inquiries receive a response within 2 business hours. Zero obligation.
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner | Protecting $4.2B+ in Annual Procurement Spend for 1,850+ Global Clients
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data sources and methodologies available upon request.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
