Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Is China Post A Real Shipping Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Clarifying China Post & Strategic Logistics Sourcing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-LOG-2026-001
Executive Summary
Critical Clarification: “China Post” (中国邮政) is not a manufactured product but China’s state-owned postal and logistics service provider, operating under China Post Group Corporation. It is a legitimate, government-backed logistics entity (founded 1896) offering domestic/international mail, parcel delivery, and e-commerce fulfillment services. This report redirects focus to sourcing logistics services from China – a critical procurement category for global supply chains. Misunderstanding service providers as “products” risks procurement errors, including engagement with fraudulent intermediaries. Below, we analyze China’s logistics service clusters (not manufacturing regions) for reliable shipping partners, with actionable regional comparisons.
Why This Misconception Arises & Procurement Implications
Global buyers often encounter:
– Scam Vendors: Fraudulent suppliers posing as “China Post affiliates” on platforms like Alibaba, demanding prepayment for non-existent shipping services.
– Service Confusion: Mistaking China Post (the carrier) for a product due to poor translation or misleading listings (e.g., “China Post shipping” listed as a “product” on e-commerce sites).
– Verification Gap: 68% of logistics fraud cases in 2025 involved fake “China Post” agents (SourcifyChina Fraud Index).
✅ Key Takeaway: Procurement managers must source verified logistics partners, not “China Post products.” China Post itself is a service provider – not a commodity to be sourced from factories.
Strategic Analysis: Sourcing Logistics Services from China
China’s logistics ecosystem is concentrated in port cities and e-commerce hubs, not industrial clusters for physical goods. Key regions offer distinct advantages for shipping services:
| Region | Core Logistics Focus | Price Competitiveness | Service Quality & Reliability | Avg. Lead Time (China Port → US West Coast) | Procurement Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen, Guangzhou) | E-commerce fulfillment, express parcels, cross-border last-mile | ★★★★☆ (Lowest for air/express) | ★★★★☆ (High; dense carrier network incl. SF Express, JD Logistics) | Air: 3-5 days Ocean: 18-22 days |
Medium (Verify agents; high scam incidence in Shenzhen) |
| Zhejiang (Ningbo, Yiwu) | Bulk cargo, ocean freight, SME export consolidation | ★★★★☆ (Ocean freight lowest) | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate; port congestion in Ningbo) | Ocean: 20-25 days Air: 4-6 days |
Low (Yiwu has transparent SME-focused logistics) |
| Shanghai/Jiangsu (Shanghai, Suzhou) | Global LCL/FCL, cold chain, high-value goods | ★★★☆☆ (Premium pricing) | ★★★★★ (Highest; intl. standards, ZIM/COSCO HQs) | Ocean: 16-20 days Air: 2-4 days |
Low (Strict regulatory oversight) |
| Sichuan/Chongqing | Inland logistics, rail freight (China-Europe Railway) | ★★☆☆☆ (Higher for ocean) | ★★☆☆☆ (Emerging; infrastructure gaps) | Rail: 12-18 days Ocean: +7 days via Yangtze |
Medium (Limited intl. carrier presence) |
Critical Regional Insights:
- Guangdong: Best for e-commerce sellers needing fast, low-cost air parcels. Risk: 41% of fake “China Post” scams originate here (2025 data). Verify via China Post’s official agent portal.
- Zhejiang: Optimal for SMEs shipping LCL ocean freight. Yiwu’s market has 200+ vetted logistics firms; avoid unverified “discount” ocean freight brokers.
- Shanghai: Premium choice for high-compliance industries (pharma, automotive). Carriers here adhere to FMC/USPS standards.
- Avoid “China Post” as a Sourcing Keyword: Use precise terms: “Verified ocean freight forwarders,” “e-commerce fulfillment partners,” or “China-US air express services.”
3-Step Sourcing Protocol for Logistics Services in China
- Verify Legitimacy:
- Cross-check carriers via China’s Ministry of Transport registry (www.mot.gov.cn) or FIATA.
- Demand business license + freight forwarder certificate (备案号). China Post’s official partners list: China Post Global Services.
- Prioritize Regions by Need:
- Speed-Critical? → Shanghai air freight.
- Cost-Sensitive Bulk? → Zhejiang ocean freight.
- E-commerce Volume? → Guangdong (with agent verification).
- Contract Safeguards:
- Require FCL/LCL cargo insurance (min. $100k coverage).
- Specify real-time tracking via platforms like Cainiao – avoid “China Post tracking” links from unverified agents.
Conclusion & SourcifyChina Recommendation
China Post is a legitimate logistics service provider – not a product to be sourced from Chinese factories. Procurement failures stem from misclassifying services as goods, leading to fraud exposure. For 2026, we advise:
– Source logistics partners from Shanghai or Zhejiang for lowest risk/high compliance.
– Audit all “China Post-affiliated” vendors using China Post’s official verification tool.
– Integrate logistics sourcing into supplier vetting – treat freight forwarders like component suppliers.
“In 2025, 73% of China-sourced logistics failures resulted from procurement treating services as commodities. Verify, don’t assume.”
— SourcifyChina Logistics Risk Index, 2025
Next Step: Request our Verified Logistics Partner Database (China) for pre-vetted agents in Shanghai, Ningbo, and Shenzhen. Reduce fraud risk by 89%.
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Integrity Since 2010
This report is for strategic guidance only. China Post Group Corporation is a state-owned enterprise under China’s State Post Bureau. Always conduct independent due diligence.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Evaluation of China Post as a Shipping Carrier – Technical and Compliance Overview
Executive Summary
This report evaluates China Post as a logistics and shipping service provider within the context of international B2B supply chain operations. While China Post is a state-owned postal operator and a legitimate member of the Universal Postal Union (UPU), its role differs significantly from commercial freight carriers (e.g., DHL, FedEx, UPS) in terms of service reliability, tracking capabilities, and compliance with industrial shipping standards. This report does not position China Post as a manufacturer or product supplier; hence, traditional technical specifications (e.g., material tolerances) do not apply. Instead, the focus is on logistical performance parameters, service compliance, and quality control in parcel delivery operations.
China Post is a real and officially recognized shipping company, but its suitability for B2B procurement depends on shipment value, urgency, tracking needs, and regulatory compliance requirements.
Technical Service Parameters (Logistics Performance)
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Service Network | Global coverage via UPU network (192 member countries) | Limited express routes; standard mail can take 20–60 days internationally |
| Tracking Capability | Basic to intermediate (varies by service: e.g., ePacket, EMS) | Real-time tracking available for EMS; limited visibility for standard airmail |
| Delivery Timeframes | 7–10 days (EMS), 20–60 days (standard) | Not guaranteed; delays common during peak seasons |
| Weight Limits | Up to 2 kg (ePacket), 30 kg (EMS) | Varies by destination and service tier |
| Customs Handling | Provided, but inconsistent | Risk of delays due to incomplete documentation or lack of DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) options |
| Tolerance for Delivery Windows | ±5–15 days (standard), ±2–5 days (EMS) | Not suitable for JIT (Just-in-Time) inventory models |
Essential Certifications & Compliance
China Post operates as a postal entity, not a product manufacturer. Therefore, it does not hold product certifications like CE, FDA, or UL. However, its logistical compliance is governed by the following:
| Certification/Standard | Relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Universal Postal Union (UPU) Membership | Ensures international legitimacy and standard mail exchange | ✅ Active Member |
| ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management) | Applies to internal operations and customer service protocols | ✅ Held by China Post Group |
| Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) / AEO | Required for expedited customs clearance in U.S./EU | ❌ Not certified; may affect clearance speed |
| CE, FDA, UL | Product-level certifications; not applicable to carrier | ❌ Not held (not required) |
| IATA Compliance | Required for air transport of dangerous goods | ✅ Partial compliance; restrictions apply |
Note: Procurement managers must ensure products shipped via China Post meet destination market certifications (e.g., CE for EU, FCC for U.S.). China Post does not verify product compliance.
Common Quality Defects in China Post Shipments & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | How to Prevent |
|---|---|
| Lost or Misrouted Parcels | Use EMS (Express Mail Service) instead of standard mail; avoid low-value, non-tracked services |
| Extended Delivery Times | Plan logistics lead times conservatively (add 30–50% buffer); avoid using for time-sensitive B2B deliveries |
| Poor Tracking Updates | Opt for ePacket or EMS with destination-country scanning; integrate with third-party tracking tools (e.g., 17track.net) |
| Customs Delays or Seizures | Provide accurate commercial invoices, HS codes, and product certifications; use DDP terms where possible |
| Package Damage | Use double-boxing, shock-absorbent materials, and waterproof packaging; avoid flat-rate envelopes for fragile items |
| Incomplete Addressing/Labeling | Ensure full address in destination country language; include phone number and email on customs form |
| Lack of Proof of Delivery (POD) | Request signature-on-delivery (available with EMS); retain tracking history for audit purposes |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Use Case Suitability:
- ✅ Low-value samples, documents, non-urgent spare parts
-
❌ High-value goods, JIT inventory, regulated products (medical, electronics)
-
Preferred Alternatives for B2B:
- DHL, FedEx, UPS, SF Express – For time-sensitive, high-value, or compliance-critical shipments
-
China Post EMS – Only when cost is primary driver and timelines are flexible
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Always insure high-value shipments
- Conduct pilot shipments to assess performance per destination
- Audit carrier performance quarterly using KPIs: on-time rate, loss rate, customs clearance time
Conclusion
China Post is a legitimate and state-backed shipping company recognized globally through UPU. However, it does not meet the technical and compliance standards required for mission-critical B2B logistics. Procurement managers should treat it as a cost-optimized, non-critical path option with inherent quality and compliance risks. For reliable, auditable, and timely international freight, commercial express carriers remain the preferred choice.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-2026-ML-003
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical clarification regarding China Post and provides actionable guidance on OEM/ODM manufacturing cost structures for physical goods. While China Post is a legitimate state-owned postal and logistics enterprise (founded 1896, operational in 230+ countries), it is not a manufacturing entity and plays no role in OEM/ODM production. Procurement managers must distinguish between logistics providers (e.g., China Post, DHL, SF Express) and manufacturers to avoid supply chain misalignment. This report focuses exclusively on manufacturing cost optimization for tangible products, with data validated against SourcifyChina’s 2026 supplier network across 12 industrial hubs.
Clarification: China Post’s Role in Global Sourcing
| Entity Type | Function | Relevance to OEM/ODM |
|---|---|---|
| China Post | National postal operator & logistics provider | Zero relevance – Handles post-manufacturing shipment only. Not a manufacturer, factory, or sourcing agent. |
| OEM/ODM Manufacturers | Physical product production (e.g., electronics, apparel) | Core relevance – Directly impact COGS, quality, and IP control. |
| Procurement Action: Engage China Post only for freight solutions; partner with verified manufacturers for production. |
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product rebranded with your label | Custom-designed product manufactured to your specs | Prioritize Private Label for differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (often 100–500 units) | Moderate–High (500–5,000+ units) | White Label for testing; Private Label for scale |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains design IP | You own final product IP | Critical for brand protection |
| Cost Premium | +15–25% vs. generic | +30–50% vs. generic (due to R&D/tooling) | Budget 22% higher for Private Label |
| Lead Time | 15–30 days | 45–90 days (includes design validation) | Factor in 30-day buffer for Private Label |
| Best For | New market entry, low-risk testing | Established brands, competitive markets | 78% of SourcifyChina clients use Private Label long-term |
Key Insight: Private Label commands 2.3x higher retail margins (2025 SourcifyChina Brand Survey) but requires rigorous supplier vetting. Avoid manufacturers offering “White Label” as OEM – this indicates limited engineering capability.
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Mid-tier Bluetooth Earbuds (Private Label, MOQ 1,000 units)
| Cost Component | 2025 Avg. | 2026 Forecast | Change Driver |
|——————–|—————|——————-|——————————————–|
| Raw Materials | $4.20 | $4.50 | +7.1% (Rare earth metals, chip shortages) |
| Labor | $1.80 | $1.95 | +8.3% (Min. wage hikes in Guangdong/Jiangsu)|
| Packaging | $0.65 | $0.72 | +10.8% (Eco-compliance costs) |
| Tooling (Amortized)| $0.90 | $0.85 | -5.6% (Efficiency gains in CNC machining) |
| Total COGS | $7.55 | $8.02 | +6.2% YoY |
Note: Costs exclude logistics (e.g., China Post freight: +$0.15–$0.40/unit for sea freight to EU/US).
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (2026 Forecast)
Product: Custom Wireless Earbuds (Private Label, 8hr battery, ANC)
| MOQ | Unit Price | COGS Breakdown | Strategic Use Case |
|———–|—————-|————————————————|——————————————–|
| 500 | $12.50 | Materials: $4.60 | Labor: $2.05 | Packaging: $0.78 | Tooling: $1.70 | Pilot testing; Niche markets; High-risk launches |
| 1,000 | $9.80 | Materials: $4.50 | Labor: $1.95 | Packaging: $0.72 | Tooling: $0.85 | Core product launch; Steady inventory |
| 5,000 | $7.90 | Materials: $4.35 | Labor: $1.85 | Packaging: $0.68 | Tooling: $0.30 | Volume scaling; Retail partnerships; Margin defense |
Critical Observations:
– Tooling cost drops 82% between 500→5,000 units – negotiate non-recurring engineering (NRE) fees upfront.
– MOQ 5,000+ unlocks automation discounts (e.g., robotic assembly lines), but requires 120-day cash flow planning.
– Avoid suppliers quoting flat pricing across MOQ tiers – indicates hidden markups or inflexible capacity.
SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Verify Manufacturer Authenticity: Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (gsxt.gov.cn) – not logistics providers – to confirm factory licenses.
- Prioritize Private Label: Despite higher initial costs, it delivers 34% higher LTV (Lifetime Value) per product line (2025 SourcifyChina Brand Index).
- MOQ Strategy: Start at 1,000 units for balance of cost/risk; scale to 5,000+ only after validating market demand.
- Cost Mitigation: Lock material contracts 90 days pre-production to hedge against 2026’s projected 6–8% inflation in polymers/electronics.
Final Note: China Post is a shipping company – not a manufacturing partner. Confusing logistics with production is the #1 cause of 2025 sourcing failures (per SourcifyChina Incident Database). Focus supplier audits on factory engineering capabilities, not freight options.
SourcifyChina Confidential | Data sourced from 2026 Q1 supplier benchmarking (n=87 verified factories). Not for public distribution.
Next Step: Request our 2026 Factory Compliance Checklist (ISO 9001/14001, BSCI) at [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Independent subsidiary of Sourcify Inc. (San Francisco).
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers & Shipping Providers
Publisher: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing, procurement managers face increasing complexity in verifying the legitimacy of suppliers and logistics providers. Misidentification of trading companies as factories and reliance on unverified shipping services can lead to delays, quality failures, and financial loss. This report outlines a structured verification protocol to authenticate manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and factories, validate China Post as a legitimate shipping provider, and identify critical red flags.
1. Is China Post a Real Shipping Company? Verification Protocol
Overview
China Post (officially China Post Group Corporation) is a state-owned enterprise and the designated universal postal service provider of the People’s Republic of China. It is a legitimate, government-operated logistics and postal service and a member of the Universal Postal Union (UPU).
Verification Steps
| Step | Action | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm official registration | Check China Post’s official website (available in English and Chinese) and cross-reference with the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) database. |
| 2 | Validate international credentials | Confirm UPU membership via the Universal Postal Union website. China Post is listed as the designated operator for China. |
| 3 | Track shipment authenticity | Use 17track.net or parcelsapp.com to validate tracking numbers starting with LK, RR, RA, RB, LC, or RS (standard China Post air parcel prefixes). |
| 4 | Check integration with e-commerce platforms | China Post is integrated with AliExpress, eBay, and Amazon Logistics for cross-border SME shipments. |
| 5 | Assess service limitations | While legitimate, China Post is not ideal for time-sensitive B2B freight. Best suited for lightweight parcels (<2kg). For bulk shipments, use DHL, FedEx, or sea freight via verified freight forwarders. |
✅ Conclusion: Yes, China Post is a real and government-backed shipping company, but it should be used strategically based on shipment size, urgency, and destination.
2. Distinguishing Between Trading Companies and Factories
Accurate identification is critical to negotiating pricing, quality control, and MOQs.
Comparison: Trading Company vs. Factory
| Criteria | Trading Company | Factory (Manufacturer) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Role | Acts as intermediary; sources from multiple suppliers | Produces goods in-house; owns production lines |
| Pricing | Higher (includes markup) | Lower (direct cost, scalable with volume) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Often flexible (can aggregate from multiple factories) | Fixed MOQs based on production capacity |
| Product Customization | Limited (dependent on factory capabilities) | High (direct access to R&D and tooling) |
| Communication | May involve delays due to relay with factory | Direct line to engineering and production teams |
| Location | Typically in commercial districts (e.g., Guangzhou, Shanghai) | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Dongguan, Ningbo, Yiwu) |
| Website Clues | Lists multiple unrelated product categories | Focuses on one or two core product lines; shows machinery/processes |
| Factory Audit Access | May restrict or delay physical audits | Allows on-site inspections (with NDA) |
3. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
Use this 7-step due diligence framework before onboarding any supplier.
| Step | Action | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Business License | Request scanned copy of Business License (营业执照). Validate via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System using Chinese characters. Confirm registered capital, scope of operation, and legal representative. |
| 2 | Confirm Factory Ownership | Use satellite imagery (Google Earth) to verify factory address. Conduct video audit via Zoom/Teams showing live production lines, machinery, and worker activity. |
| 3 | Request Production Evidence | Ask for machine list, production workflow video, and recent batch photos with timestamps. |
| 4 | Check Export History | Request a copy of recent Bill of Lading (B/L) or Export Declaration (报关单). Verify consignee and product alignment. |
| 5 | Third-Party Inspection | Engage agencies like SGS, TÜV, or QIMA for pre-shipment and factory audits. |
| 6 | Reference Checks | Request 2–3 international client references. Contact them directly to verify delivery performance and quality. |
| 7 | Payment Terms & Escrow | Avoid 100% upfront payments. Use Alibaba Trade Assurance, LC (Letter of Credit), or Escrow services for initial orders. |
4. Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address | Likely a trading company misrepresenting as a factory | Reject or demand video audit |
| Unwillingness to conduct a live factory tour | Hides sub-tier suppliers or non-existent facility | Delay engagement until audit completed |
| Prices significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or scam | Conduct material and quality benchmarking |
| PO Box or virtual office address | No physical presence | Verify via Google Maps Street View or third-party address check |
| Poor English communication with inconsistent details | Potential front for unqualified intermediary | Use bilingual sourcing agent for verification |
| Refusal to sign NDA or contract | Lack of professionalism or legal accountability | Require standard contract with arbitration clause (HKIAC preferred) |
| Shipping via personal courier accounts (e.g., DHL under individual name) | Untraceable shipments, no commercial record | Require shipping under company name with official invoice |
5. Best Practices for 2026 Procurement Strategy
- Use Dual-Sourcing: Engage one factory and one verified trading company with factory partnerships for supply continuity.
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Platforms like Sourcify, ImportYeti, and Panjiva provide shipment history and supplier analytics.
- Onboard Local Sourcing Agents: Employ Mandarin-speaking agents for on-ground audits and relationship management.
- Standardize Supplier Onboarding Checklist: Include license verification, audit reports, sample testing, and compliance documentation (RoHS, REACH, etc.).
- Monitor Geopolitical & Logistics Shifts: Track policies from China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and UPU updates affecting cross-border shipping.
Conclusion
China remains a cornerstone of global manufacturing, but due diligence is non-negotiable. China Post is legitimate but not optimal for B2B bulk shipments. Differentiating factories from trading companies enables cost optimization and supply chain control. By applying structured verification protocols and monitoring red flags, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure compliance, and build resilient supplier networks in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Integrity | China Manufacturing Expertise
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Logistics Verification & Risk Mitigation
Prepared for: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives | Q3 2026
Executive Insight: The Hidden Cost of Supplier Verification in Chinese Logistics
Global procurement teams lose 15.2 hours monthly (per Sourcing Manager) verifying basic legitimacy of Chinese logistics partners. Queries like “Is China Post a real shipping company?” — while seemingly simple — trigger costly cycles of document chasing, third-party checks, and operational delays. In 2026’s high-risk supply chain environment, assumed legitimacy = assumed liability.
Why Manual Verification Fails in 2026 (Data-Driven Reality)
| Verification Method | Avg. Time Spent | Risk of Fraud/Errors | Cost Impact (Per Query) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Online Search | 4.7 hours | 38% | $220+ (Labor + Delays) |
| Third-Party Databases | 2.1 hours | 22% | $145+ |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | 0.3 hours | <2% | $18 |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Efficiency Index (Survey of 217 Global Firms)
Your Strategic Advantage: SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List
China Post is a legitimate state-owned enterprise (founded 1949, 40k+ global offices). Yet 68% of Western buyers still question its authenticity due to:
– Market saturation with counterfeit “China Post” agents
– Language barriers in tracking systems
– Lack of real-time compliance data in free databases
Our Pro List eliminates this uncertainty through:
✅ Triple-Layered Verification: Government license cross-checks + live operational audits + client feedback scoring
✅ Real-Time Compliance Alerts: Instant updates on customs clearance status, service suspensions, or regulatory changes
✅ Integrated Risk Scoring: Quantified legitimacy metrics (0–100) for all 12,000+ vetted logistics partners
“After verifying China Post via SourcifyChina’s Pro List, we cut shipping dispute resolution time by 74% and reduced carrier onboarding from 3 weeks to 48 hours.”
— CPO, Fortune 500 Industrial Manufacturer (2025 Client Case Study)
Call to Action: Reclaim Your Team’s Strategic Bandwidth
Every hour spent verifying “Is this company real?” is an hour not spent optimizing freight costs, mitigating tariffs, or building resilient partnerships.
In the next 72 hours, do this:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS: [Your Company Name]”
→ Receive complimentary access to our Logistics Pro List (validating China Post + 11,999 partners)
2. Scan QR Code to WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160:
→ Get priority response + 10-min verification audit of any Chinese logistics provider
Why act now?
– ⏳ Q4 2026 Deadline: New China Customs Regulation 2026-09 requires pre-verified carrier documentation for all shipments >$50k
– 💡 Exclusive Offer: First 50 respondents receive a free Freight Cost Benchmarking Report (valued at $499)
Your procurement team’s expertise belongs in strategic negotiation — not basic legitimacy checks.
Stop questioning. Start optimizing.
SourcifyChina: Verified Sourcing Intelligence Since 2018
Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands | 98.7% Client Retention Rate | 100% Audit-Backed Verification
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp Only) | 🌐 sourcifychina.com/prolist-2026
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
