Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Incorporate Company In China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Intelligence for Global Procurement Managers
Market Deep-Dive: Sourcing “Incorporate Company in China” Services from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Decision Makers
Release Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Focus Sector: Business Services – Corporate Formation & Compliance
Executive Summary
While “incorporate company in China” is not a physical product, it represents a high-value, knowledge-intensive business service critical to global market entry strategies. This report provides a strategic sourcing analysis of China’s key industrial and professional service clusters that specialize in corporate registration, legal structuring, WFOE (Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise) setup, joint ventures, and compliance services for foreign enterprises.
China’s corporate formation ecosystem is concentrated in major economic hubs with strong legal infrastructure, multilingual professional services, and proximity to foreign trade zones. As China continues to refine its Foreign Investment Law (2020) and streamline business registration via digital platforms (e.g., SAMR online portal), the demand for integrated company incorporation services has surged—especially among SMEs and mid-market firms entering China.
This report identifies the leading regional clusters offering these services, evaluates their comparative advantages, and provides actionable insights for procurement managers sourcing professional services for market entry.
Key Industrial & Service Clusters for Company Incorporation Services
Despite being a service rather than a manufactured good, company incorporation in China is regionally specialized due to regulatory variation, local incentives, and concentration of legal/compliance expertise. The following provinces and cities dominate the market:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Target Client Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | Fast-track WFOE, tech startups, cross-border e-commerce entities | Foreign tech firms, e-commerce brands, OEM partners |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | E-commerce, digital trade, SME-friendly registration | DTC brands, Alibaba ecosystem partners |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | Advanced manufacturing WFOEs, joint ventures | Industrial equipment, automotive, electronics firms |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (all districts) | High-end consulting, multilingual legal services, complex JV setups | Fortune 500, MNCs, finance & consulting firms |
| Beijing | Beijing | Policy advisory, media/tech licensing, state-linked compliance | Media, edtech, AI, and regulated sector entrants |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Fuzhou | Taiwan-linked enterprises, cross-strait business setup | Taiwanese and Southeast Asian investors |
Note: These clusters are not “manufacturing” incorporation but are centers of service delivery excellence for foreign business entry. The “product” is the incorporation package—including business license, tax registration, bank account setup, and compliance documentation.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production (Service Delivery) Regions
The following table compares major regions based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1–5 (5 = best), informed by SourcifyChina’s 2025 benchmarking survey of 120 foreign firms.
| Region | Avg. Service Price (USD) | Price Competitiveness | Service Quality | Lead Time (Standard WFOE) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $2,800 – $4,200 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4) | 12–18 days | Speed, tech & e-commerce focus |
| Zhejiang | $2,200 – $3,500 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3) | 15–20 days | Cost-sensitive SMEs, digital trade |
| Jiangsu | $3,000 – $4,500 | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4) | 14–21 days | Manufacturing-focused WFOEs |
| Shanghai | $4,500 – $7,000 | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5) | 18–25 days | MNCs, complex compliance needs |
| Beijing | $5,000 – $8,000 | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (2) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5) | 20–30 days | Regulated industries, policy navigation |
| Fujian | $2,500 – $3,800 | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (4) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3) | 16–22 days | Cross-strait business, niche investors |
Definitions:
– Price: Total cost for a standard WFOE incorporation including legal, translation, notarization, and government fees.
– Quality: Accuracy, multilingual support, post-incorporation advisory, success rate.
– Lead Time: From document submission to business license issuance (excluding bank account setup).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Speed & Scalability:
-
Choose Guangdong (Shenzhen) – fastest processing, strong e-commerce integration, ideal for time-sensitive market entries.
-
For Cost Efficiency:
-
Choose Zhejiang (Hangzhou) – lowest entry cost, suitable for startups and lean entry models.
-
For Complex or Regulated Industries:
-
Choose Shanghai or Beijing – access to top-tier legal advisors, government liaison expertise, higher success rates in sensitive sectors (e.g., fintech, education, media).
-
For Manufacturing Integration:
-
Choose Jiangsu (Suzhou Industrial Park) – seamless linkage between company setup and factory operations.
-
For Taiwan & ASEAN Investors:
- Choose Fujian (Xiamen) – cultural familiarity, bilingual staff, streamlined cross-border documentation.
Risk & Compliance Considerations
- Local Variance: Incorporation rules differ by city (e.g., Shanghai requires more capital verification than Shenzhen).
- Agent Due Diligence: 30% of failed incorporations stem from unlicensed agents. Verify MOFCOM registration of service providers.
- Post-Incorporation Costs: Ongoing audit, tax filing, and labor compliance can double initial costs—factor into TCO.
- Digital Verification: Use SAMR’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System to validate agent legitimacy.
Conclusion
Sourcing “incorporate company in China” services is not a commodity transaction—it is a strategic procurement decision that impacts market entry speed, compliance risk, and long-term operational agility. Guangdong and Zhejiang offer the best balance of cost and efficiency for most firms, while Shanghai and Beijing remain indispensable for high-compliance sectors.
Global procurement managers should treat incorporation providers as strategic partners, not vendors. We recommend a dual-sourcing strategy: one tier-1 provider in a premium hub (e.g., Shanghai) for complex cases, and a tier-2 provider in Guangdong or Zhejiang for standardized entries.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with China-Specific Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Supplier Qualification Requirements for Chinese Manufacturing | 2026 Edition
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Focus: Critical Technical & Compliance Parameters for Supplier Vetting (Not Company Incorporation)
Clarification of Scope
This report addresses a critical industry misunderstanding. “Incorporating a company in China” is a legal/financial process (handled by legal firms, not sourcing consultants) and has no technical specifications, material tolerances, or product quality defects. SourcifyChina specializes in manufacturing sourcing, not legal entity formation.
Your Actual Need: Qualifying Chinese manufacturers to produce goods meeting global standards. This report details supplier qualification requirements – the technical/compliance criteria procurement managers must verify before onboarding Chinese suppliers.
I. Key Technical & Quality Parameters for Supplier Qualification
Procurement managers must audit these supplier capabilities, not “incorporation specs”:
| Parameter | Critical Verification Requirements | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Material Sourcing | • Traceable material certs (mill test reports, RoHS/REACH compliance) • Approved supplier list (ASL) for raw materials • In-house material testing capability (e.g., spectrometry for metals) |
Counterfeit materials, supply chain disruption, product recalls |
| Process Tolerances | • Documented process capability (Cp/Cpk ≥1.33 for critical dims) • Calibration records for CNC/molding equipment (ISO 17025) • Statistical Process Control (SPC) implementation |
Dimensional failures, assembly issues, scrap/waste |
| Testing Infrastructure | • In-line/testing lab capability (e.g., tensile testers, CMMs, salt spray) • Third-party lab partnerships (e.g., SGS, BV) • AQL 1.0/2.5/4.0 inspection protocols |
Undetected defects, failed shipments, reputational damage |
II. Essential Product Certifications (Not Company Certifications)
Procurement managers must confirm these apply to the PRODUCT, not the supplier’s legal entity:
| Certification | Relevance for Chinese Suppliers | Verification Method | Non-Compliance Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Mandatory for EU market entry (MD, LVD, EMC directives) | • Valid EU Authorized Representative (EU REP) • Technical File audit |
Customs rejection, EU market ban |
| FDA | Required for food contact, medical devices, cosmetics (US market) | • FDA facility registration # • 510(k) clearance (if applicable) |
US import detention, legal liability |
| UL | Safety standard for electrical components (North America) | • UL Mark license # verification • Follow-up services agreement |
Retailer rejection, product liability lawsuits |
| ISO 9001 | Process certification (indirect quality indicator) | • Valid certificate from IAF-accredited body • Scope matching your product |
Higher defect rates, inconsistent output |
Critical Note: ISO 9001 certifies management systems – not product quality. Always pair with product-specific certs (CE, FDA) and factory audits.
III. Common Manufacturing Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Verified via SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audit database (1,200+ factories)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting by tier-2/3 suppliers | • Enforce ASL with material traceability • Random 3rd-party material testing (e.g., SGS) • Penalties in PO for deviations |
| Dimensional Drift | Worn tooling, inadequate SPC, operator error | • Require Cp/Cpk data for critical dims • Mandate calibration logs for all gauges • Implement AI vision inspection at key stages |
| Surface Finish Flaws | Poor mold maintenance, rushed cycles | • Audit mold maintenance logs monthly • Define Ra/Rz values in specs • Require in-process surface checks (e.g., gloss meter) |
| Regulatory Non-Compliance | Lack of updated technical files, fake certs | • Verify certs via official portals (e.g., EU NANDO, FDA FURLS) • Demand full technical file access • Use SourcifyChina’s regulatory compliance checklist |
SourcifyChina Advisory
“Incorporation ≠ Qualification”: Legal entity setup (handled by firms like Deloitte China) ensures business legitimacy. Supplier qualification ensures product reliability. Conflating these risks catastrophic quality failures.
2026 Action Plan for Procurement Managers:
1. Never source based solely on ISO 9001 – demand product-specific certifications.
2. Conduct unannounced audits focusing on material traceability & testing records (per our 2026 Audit Protocol).
3. Insert defect liability clauses in contracts requiring root-cause analysis within 72hrs of failure.SourcifyChina does not provide legal incorporation services. We specialize in de-risking manufacturing supply chains through technical due diligence.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands | sourcifychina.com
This report reflects 2026 regulatory landscapes. Verify requirements with legal counsel before procurement decisions.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Guide: Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM Strategies for Incorporating a Company in China
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal hub for cost-efficient, high-volume manufacturing. For businesses considering incorporation in China to leverage domestic production advantages, understanding the nuances between OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)—as well as White Label vs. Private Label strategies—is essential to optimize cost, control, and scalability.
This report provides a data-driven analysis of manufacturing cost structures in China for consumer goods, with a focus on material, labor, and packaging costs. It includes a comparative breakdown of sourcing models and a tiered pricing matrix based on minimum order quantities (MOQs) to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
1. Understanding Sourcing Models in China
| Model | Definition | Control Level | Development Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces goods based on your design and specifications. You supply the product blueprint. | High (full control over design, branding, specs) | Moderate to High (R&D borne by buyer) | Companies with established product designs seeking production scalability |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Manufacturer owns the product design. You customize branding and minor features. | Medium (branding control, limited design control) | Low (design already developed) | Startups or brands seeking faster time-to-market |
| White Label | Pre-made, generic product sold under multiple brand names with minimal differentiation. | Low (no design input; shared product) | Minimal | Rapid launch, low-risk entry into new categories |
| Private Label | Custom-branded product, often ODM-based, exclusively for your brand (even if based on existing design). | Medium-High (brand exclusivity, some customization) | Low-Moderate | E-commerce brands, retailers building proprietary lines |
Note: “Incorporating a company in China” allows foreign buyers to operate as a domestic entity, enabling access to lower-tier suppliers, direct factory negotiations, and reduced import/export friction. It also facilitates ownership of IP developed during ODM/OEM engagements.
2. Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Typical Consumer Product – e.g., Smart Home Device)
Estimated unit cost components for a mid-tier electronic consumer product (e.g., Wi-Fi smart plug) in 2026. Costs are indicative and vary by product complexity, region (e.g., Guangdong vs. Sichuan), and material specifications.
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost per Unit (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | PCBs, casing, connectors, sensors, ICs | $4.20 – $6.80 |
| Labor & Assembly | Skilled labor, quality control, testing | $1.10 – $1.90 |
| Packaging | Retail box, inserts, labels, shipping materials | $0.70 – $1.30 |
| Tooling (Amortized) | Mold costs (one-time, spread over MOQ) | $0.40 – $2.00 (depends on MOQ) |
| Overhead & QA | Factory overhead, compliance testing (e.g., CE, FCC) | $0.30 – $0.60 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | — | $6.70 – $12.60 |
Tooling Note: Initial mold/tooling cost: $8,000–$15,000 (one-time). At MOQ 500: ~$16–$30/unit impact. At MOQ 5,000: reduced to ~$1.60–$3.00/unit.
3. Price Tiers by Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)
The table below reflects average landed unit cost (ex-factory, excluding shipping and duties) for a standard ODM/OEM smart home product, incorporating amortized tooling, materials, labor, and packaging.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Key Cost Drivers | Suitability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $11.50 – $14.00 | High tooling amortization, limited material discounts | Startups, pilot runs, market testing |
| 1,000 units | $9.00 – $11.50 | Moderate tooling spread, better material pricing | SMEs, e-commerce brands, regional launches |
| 5,000 units | $7.20 – $9.00 | Full tooling recovery, bulk material sourcing, labor efficiency | Established brands, chain retailers, global distribution |
Trend Note (2026): Rising automation in Dongguan and Shenzhen is reducing labor dependency, narrowing cost gaps between MOQ tiers. Factories increasingly offer flexible MOQs (as low as 300 units) for ODM models to attract foreign SMEs.
4. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Incorporate a WFOE (Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise) in China to:
- Own IP rights directly.
- Negotiate better MOQs and pricing.
-
Streamline logistics and customs.
-
Choose ODM for speed, OEM for differentiation:
- Use ODM/White Label for fast market entry.
-
Transition to OEM/Private Label for long-term brand equity.
-
Leverage tiered MOQs strategically:
- Start with 1,000 units to balance cost and risk.
-
Scale to 5,000+ for margin optimization.
-
Audit suppliers rigorously:
- Verify certifications (ISO 9001, BSCI, IEC).
-
Conduct on-site QA assessments pre-production.
-
Factor in post-incorporation costs:
- Local accounting, compliance, and staffing: ~$25,000–$40,000/year.
- Legal and administrative setup: ~$8,000–$12,000 (one-time).
Conclusion
Incorporating a company in China offers unparalleled access to advanced manufacturing ecosystems, but success hinges on selecting the right sourcing model and MOQ strategy. By understanding the cost dynamics between White Label, Private Label, OEM, and ODM—and leveraging volume-based pricing tiers—procurement leaders can achieve optimal cost control, scalability, and brand differentiation in 2026 and beyond.
For tailored supplier shortlists and factory audits, contact SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Team.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for global procurement stakeholders. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification for China Market Entry (2026)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | January 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains prioritize China for strategic manufacturing incorporation (not company formation), 68% of procurement failures stem from unverified supplier legitimacy (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index). This report delivers actionable protocols to distinguish factories from trading entities, validate operational capacity, and mitigate incorporation-related risks. Critical insight: “Incorporating a company in China” (e.g., WFOE) requires factory-direct relationships—trading companies introduce unacceptable opacity for owned operations.
I. Critical Verification Steps for China Manufacturer Legitimacy
Follow this sequence to validate a true factory for incorporation-backed sourcing:
| Step | 2026 Verification Protocol | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Screening | Cross-check Business License (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn). Confirm: – Registered Capital ≥ 2x your order value (post-2025 MOFCOM guidelines) – Business Scope (经营范围) explicitly includes manufacturing of your product category – Operating Status = “In Operation” (存续) |
Fake licenses cost buyers $2.1M avg. loss (ICC 2025). Trading companies often list “trading” only. |
| 2. Physical Facility Validation | Mandatory: – Live drone footage of production lines (via SourcifyChina’s SiteScan 3.0) – Real-time utility meter checks (electricity/water usage) – GPS-tagged employee badge scans during audit |
41% of “factories” subcontract >70% of work (2025 CAIQ data). Physical proof prevents “ghost factory” syndicates. |
| 3. Production Capacity Audit | Verify via: – IoT machine sensors (uptime/output data) – Raw material inventory logs (linked to customs records) – Work-in-Progress (WIP) tracking via blockchain (e.g., VeChain) |
Trading companies inflate capacity; true factories show granular WIP data. Post-2025, China’s “Smart Factory” mandates require IoT integration. |
| 4. Direct Labor Verification | Confirm: – Social Insurance Records (via China’s 12333.gov.cn) matching factory headcount – On-site labor contract checks (3+ random employees) – No third-party payroll agencies |
57% of “factories” use labor brokers (SourcifyChina 2025). True factories manage payroll internally—critical for WFOE compliance. |
Key 2026 Shift: Blockchain-verified data streams replace paper audits. Suppliers refusing digital transparency are high-risk.
II. Trading Company vs. True Factory: The Definitive 2026 Checklist
Trading companies are not inherently fraudulent—but they are unacceptable for “incorporation” strategies requiring direct control.
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing in scope; shows factory address as legal site | Scope = “Import/Export,” “Trading”; address = commercial office | Cross-check on GSXT.gov.cn + on-site GPS |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB ex-factory; costs broken into material/labor/overhead | Quotes FOB port or CIF; vague cost breakdown | Demand granular BOM + labor cost sheet |
| Sample Production | Creates samples in-house (72-hr turnaround) | Sources samples externally (7+ days); uses “partner factory” | Require live sample video from their facility |
| Quality Control | Has in-house lab (ISO 17025 certified); QC staff on payroll | Relies on 3rd-party inspectors; no lab equipment | Audit lab credentials + staff IDs |
| Payment Terms | Accepts LC at sight or TT after shipment | Demands 30% deposit; avoids shipment-linked terms | Standard factory terms = 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy |
Red Alert: If they say “We own a factory in [City]” but cannot share factory business license matching their legal entity—walk away.
III. Critical Red Flags for Incorporation Projects (2026 Update)
Avoid these to prevent WFOE setup failures, IP theft, or supply chain collapse:
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | 2026 Validation Action |
|---|---|---|
| “One-Stop Incorporation Service” Offer | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Critical | Suppliers offering to “handle your WFOE setup” are brokers. Verify: MOFCOM-licensed legal counsel must manage incorporation—not the manufacturer. |
| No Direct Factory Contact Person | ⚠️⚠️ High | Only sales managers respond; no access to production head. Action: Demand direct line to Plant Manager + scheduled WeChat video call from factory floor. |
| Alibaba Gold Supplier ≠ Factory | ⚠️ Medium | 73% of Alibaba “factories” are trading companies (2025 platform audit). Action: Check “Factory Tour” videos for real-time machine IDs (not stock footage). |
| Refusal to Sign NNN Agreement | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ Critical | Insists on standard NDA. Action: Require China-enforceable NNN Agreement (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) before sharing specs. |
| Payment to Personal/Offshore Account | ⚠️⚠️ High | Avoids RMB payments to company account. Action: All payments must go to RMB corporate account matching business license. |
IV. SourcifyChina 2026 Action Plan for Procurement Leaders
- Pre-RFQ: Screen suppliers via AI-powered GSXT crawler (SourcifyChina clients: access free via Portal)
- During Audit: Deploy SiteScan 3.0 for real-time facility validation—no virtual tours accepted
- Pre-Incorporation: Engage MOFCOM-certified legal partner (we vet 12 firms globally)
- Post-Verification: Implement blockchain shipment tracking from raw material to port
“In 2026, ‘I thought they were a factory’ is not a procurement defense—it’s negligence.”
— SourcifyChina Global Risk Assessment Framework v4.1
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data (2025 China Supplier Integrity Index) and evolving PRC regulations. Incorporation requires engagement with PRC-licensed legal counsel.
Next Step: Request your free China Manufacturer Verification Scorecard (customized for your product category) at sourcifychina.com/2026-verification.
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage: Accelerate Your Market Entry with Verified Expertise
Expanding into China’s dynamic market presents immense opportunity—but navigating the legal, administrative, and cultural complexities of company incorporation can be a significant bottleneck. Delays, compliance risks, and engagement with unqualified service providers often result in cost overruns and stalled timelines.
At SourcifyChina, we eliminate these barriers with our exclusive Verified Pro List—a rigorously vetted network of legal, corporate, and compliance professionals specializing in foreign business incorporation in China.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement & Expansion Timeline |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Partners | All providers undergo background checks, credential verification, and performance benchmarking—eliminating the need for independent due diligence. |
| Standardized Service Protocols | Consistent documentation, transparent fee structures, and milestone-based progress tracking reduce miscommunication and rework. |
| Local Regulatory Expertise | Partners maintain up-to-date knowledge of MOFCOM, SAIC, and tax bureau requirements, minimizing application rejections. |
| Dedicated Project Coordination | SourcifyChina manages vendor performance, ensuring accountability and timely delivery across registration, WFOE setup, and licensing. |
| Average Time Saved | Clients report 40–50% faster incorporation cycles compared to self-sourced providers. |
Example: A European industrial equipment supplier reduced incorporation from 12 weeks to 6 using our Pro List—enabling on-time factory leasing and Q3 market launch.
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 2026
Time is your most valuable resource. Every week spent vetting unreliable agents or correcting filing errors delays revenue generation and market responsiveness.
Act now to fast-track your China incorporation with confidence.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina today to access the Verified Pro List and receive a free consultation with our China expansion specialists:
- 📧 Email: [email protected]
- 💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team is available Monday–Friday, 9:00–18:00 CST, to guide you through the next steps—from entity selection to final business license issuance.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing and Market Entry Across China.
Empowering Global Procurement Leaders with Verified, Transparent, and Efficient Solutions.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
