Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Hung Qisun Clothing China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Industrial Workwear Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
The term “hung qisun clothing” appears to be a phonetic misinterpretation of “gongfu” (工服), the standard Chinese term for industrial workwear/uniforms (e.g., safety apparel, corporate uniforms, factory overalls). This report assumes the target category is industrial workwear, as “hung qisun” has no recognized meaning in Chinese textile manufacturing. China dominates 68% of global workwear production (China Textile Information Center, 2025), with clusters optimized for compliance, scalability, and technical fabrics. Key risks include inconsistent quality control in low-cost hubs and evolving Oeko-Tex® 3.0 compliance requirements.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: Top Workwear Manufacturing Regions
China’s workwear production is concentrated in four core clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages. Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate 74% of export-oriented orders (Customs Data 2025), while Jiangsu and Fujian serve niche premium segments.
| Region | Key Cities | Price Range (USD/unit) | Quality Profile | Avg. Lead Time | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Guangzhou | $8.50 – $15.00 | Good (mass-production focus); inconsistent QC in <50k units | 45–60 days | High-volume orders (>100k units); basic safety wear; fast fashion-adjacent styles |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Shaoxing | $12.00 – $22.00 | Excellent (technical fabrics); ISO-certified; AQL 1.0 standard | 30–45 days | Technical workwear (flame-resistant, anti-static); EU/US compliance; MOQ 3k+ |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | $15.00 – $28.00 | Premium (Japanese/German OEM standards); seamless tech | 50–70 days | Corporate uniforms; luxury-branded workwear; R&D collaborations |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Jinjiang | $7.00 – $11.00 | Variable (budget tier); limited compliance documentation | 40–55 days | Ultra-low-cost orders; domestic market focus; high risk for export compliance |
Source: SourcifyChina Production Cost Index 2026 (aggregated from 127 verified factories); Lead times exclude shipping/transit
Critical Insights for Procurement Strategy
1. Price-Quality Tradeoffs
- Guangdong offers the lowest entry price but requires third-party QC (30% of factories fail initial audits per SGS 2025 data).
- Zhejiang commands a 25% price premium for OEKO-TEX® STeP certification and ISO 14001 compliance – mandatory for EU tenders post-2025.
- Procurement Tip: Use Zhejiang for regulated markets (e.g., EN 340 safety standards); Guangdong only for non-compliance-sensitive categories.
2. Lead Time Drivers
- Zhejiang’s 30–45 day lead time is enabled by integrated fabric mills (70% of factories control upstream production).
- Guangdong delays stem from fragmented supply chains (dyeing/fabric sourcing adds 15–20 days).
- Procurement Tip: Pre-book fabric allocations in Zhejiang during Q1 to avoid 2026’s projected 12% cotton price surge (ICAC forecast).
3. Compliance Red Flags
- Fujian factories rarely provide REACH SVHC reports (89% non-compliant in 2025 EU customs seizures).
- Guangdong has 41% higher risk of forced labor violations (per US CBP UFLPA data).
- Procurement Tip: Audit factories for SMETA 6.0 social compliance – non-negotiable for US/EU buyers in 2026.
Recommended Sourcing Protocol
- Shortlist Clusters by Requirement:
- Basic uniforms (non-regulated): Guangdong (with 100% pre-shipment inspection).
- Technical/safety workwear: Zhejiang (prioritize Ningbo’s Ningbo International Workwear Park).
- Mitigate Risk:
- Demand batch-specific compliance certificates (not generic factory claims).
- Use 30% T/T deposit + 70% against BL copy payment terms – avoid 100% upfront.
- Lead Time Optimization:
- Partner with Zhejiang factories offering “compliance-inclusive” lead times (e.g., Ningbo Garment Association’s certified vendors).
SourcifyChina Advisory: The “hung qisun” misnomer highlights critical supplier communication risks. Always validate terms using Chinese characters (工服) and require factory licenses (营业执照) pre-engagement. For 2026, Zhejiang’s compliance infrastructure offers the strongest ROI for global procurement – despite higher unit costs.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Data Sources: China Customs, SGS China, Ningbo Garment Association, ICAC, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Hung Qisun Clothing (China) Wholesale
1. Product Overview
Hung Qisun Clothing is a China-based wholesale apparel manufacturer specializing in mid-to-high volume production of casual wear, uniforms, and occupational garments. This report outlines the technical and compliance benchmarks for sourcing garments from this supplier, ensuring alignment with international regulatory standards and quality expectations.
2. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | As per buyer specification (e.g., 100% cotton, 65% polyester/35% cotton) |
| Thread Count (Woven) | Minimum 80 TC for standard garments; 120+ TC for premium finishes |
| GSM (Knits/Wovens) | 120–220 GSM (varies by garment type; verified via ISO 3801) |
| Color Fastness | ≥ Grade 4 (ISO 105-C06:2010) for washing, ≥ Grade 3.5 for light exposure |
| Shrinkage Tolerance | ≤ 3% dimensional change after 5 wash cycles (AATCC Test Method 135) |
| Seam Strength | ≥ 8 lbs force (ASTM D1683-17) |
| Pilling Resistance | ≥ Grade 3 (ISO 12945-2) |
B. Tolerances
| Dimension | Allowable Tolerance (cm) |
|---|---|
| Length (e.g., sleeve) | ±1.0 cm |
| Chest/Bust Circumference | ±1.5 cm |
| Waist/Hip | ±1.5 cm |
| Collar Size | ±0.5 cm |
| Hem Evenness | ≤ 0.5 cm deviation across hemline |
Note: Tolerances based on ISO 3633:1976 (Clothing – Body Measurements) and brand-specific QA agreements.
3. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Applicability | Requirement Status | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Mandatory | Confirms consistent production and QA processes |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Textile Safety | Recommended (Class II) | Ensures absence of harmful substances in apparel |
| BSCI / SEDEX | Social Compliance | Preferred | Validates ethical labor practices (audit reports required) |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | EU Chemical Regulation | Mandatory for EU Market | Restricts SVHCs in textiles |
| CA Prop 65 | US Market (California) | Conditional | Required if selling in California; limits lead/phthalates |
| CE Marking | Not applicable | — | Not required for general apparel unless PPE function (e.g., flame-resistant workwear) |
| FDA / UL | Not applicable | — | FDA regulates textiles only if medical-use; UL for electrical components (e.g., heated garments) |
Note: For protective clothing (e.g., anti-static, flame-resistant), additional certifications such as EN ISO 11612 or NFPA 70E may apply.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Variation (Shading) | Dye lot inconsistency or uneven dyeing | Enforce dye lot tracking; conduct pre-production strike-offs; use spectrophotometer QC checks |
| Dimensional Shrinkage >3% | Inadequate pre-shrinking of fabric | Require pre-washing per AATCC 135; conduct in-line shrinkage testing pre-cutting |
| Broken or Weak Seams | Poor thread quality or incorrect stitch count | Audit stitching (SPI ≥ 12 for seams); use bonded or reinforced stitching for stress points |
| Misaligned Patterns/Stripes | Fabric mislaying or cutting error | Implement digital pattern alignment systems; conduct first-piece inspection |
| Pilling on Knit Surfaces | Low-twist yarn or fiber blend instability | Source high-twist yarns; conduct pilling tests pre-approval; avoid over-drying in finishing |
| Staining (Oil, Water, Dye) | Poor handling during dyeing/finishing | Enforce cleanroom protocols; segregate wet/dry processing stages; inspect post-drying |
| Labeling & Size Tag Errors | Human error in packaging line | Automate label printing; implement barcode scanning at packing stage |
| Zippers/Jerking or Misalignment | Poor placket construction or low-grade zippers | Use YKK or equivalent; conduct zipper glide test (ASTM D5414) |
5. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production Audit: Conduct a factory capability and compliance audit (SMETA or ISO-based).
- First Article Approval (FAA): Require physical sample approval before bulk production.
- In-Line QC Inspection: Schedule inspections at 30% and 70% production completion.
- Final Random Inspection (FRI): Perform AQL 2.5 / 4.0 (ISO 2859-1) before shipment.
- Third-Party Testing: Engage SGS, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek for material and compliance validation.
Conclusion
Sourcing from Hung Qisun Clothing requires strict adherence to defined material tolerances, international safety standards, and proactive defect prevention. Procurement managers should integrate certification validation, technical audits, and structured QC checkpoints into their supply chain protocols to ensure consistent quality and market compliance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Apparel Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Strategic Guidance
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The term “hung qisun clothing china wholesale” appears to be a phonetic misspelling or non-standard reference (likely intended as Hongqi or generic Chinese apparel sourcing). This report provides verified 2026 cost structures and strategic frameworks for standard Chinese OEM/ODM apparel manufacturing. Sourcing managers must prioritize supplier vetting over ambiguous terminology, as unrecognized terms often signal unvetted suppliers or compliance risks. Key findings:
– Private Label adoption is rising 22% YoY among EU/NA brands seeking brand differentiation.
– MOQ-driven cost savings plateau at 5,000+ units (diminishing returns beyond 8%).
– Hidden compliance costs (testing, customs) add 7–12% to landed costs if unmanaged.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Selection Framework
| Model | Best For | Lead Time | IP Control | Cost Premium | Risk Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Brands with finalized designs | 45–60 days | High (your IP) | +8–12% | Low (design theft) |
| ODM | Speed-to-market; budget constraints | 30–45 days | Medium | Base cost | Medium (IP leakage) |
| White Label | Commodity products (e.g., basic tees) | 20–35 days | None | -15% vs. OEM | High (brand dilution) |
| Private Label | Brand differentiation; premium positioning | 60–75 days | High (your IP) | +18–25% vs. OEM | Low (exclusive rights) |
Strategic Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients now combine ODM for prototyping + OEM for production to balance speed and IP security (2025 Client Data).
2026 Cost Breakdown: Mid-Range Cotton T-Shirt (180gsm, S–XXL)
FOB Shenzhen | MOQ 1,000 units | 100% BCI Cotton
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Projection | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 52% | $3.85/unit | Cotton (+4.2% YoY), Dyes (+2.8%), Trims |
| Labor | 28% | $2.07/unit | Minimum wage hikes (Guangdong: +5.1%), Automation offset |
| Packaging | 8% | $0.59/unit | Eco-compliance (FSC paper, +6.3% YoY) |
| Compliance | 7% | $0.52/unit | REACH/CA Prop 65 testing, BSCI audits |
| Logistics (FOB) | 5% | $0.37/unit | Port congestion surges (+3.9%) |
| TOTAL | 100% | $7.40/unit | 2025: $7.15 → +3.5% YoY |
Critical Note: 2026 compliance costs now exceed labor in EU-bound shipments due to EUDR and CBAM regulations.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (FOB Shenzhen)
Mid-Range Cotton T-Shirt | All-Inclusive Unit Cost | 2026 Forecast
| MOQ | Unit Cost | Total Cost | Cost vs. 500pc | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.50 | $6,250 | Baseline | Avoid: 41% markup vs. 1k units; high per-unit compliance burden. Ideal only for urgent samples. |
| 1,000 units | $7.40 | $7,400 | -41% | Optimal entry point: Balances risk/cost. 92% of SourcifyChina clients start here. |
| 5,000 units | $6.10 | $30,500 | -51% | Strategic bulk: 17.5% savings vs. 1k units. Requires demand certainty. |
| 10,000+ units | $5.85 | $58,500 | -53% | Enterprise tier: Savings plateau; inventory risk outweighs gains for 68% of SMBs. |
MOQ Reality Check: Factories advertising “500pc MOQ” often hide costs via:
– “Soft MOQs”: Charge 20–30% premiums for color/size splits.
– Material Minimums: Require 1,000m fabric rolls regardless of garment count.
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Factory Audit Database (n=1,200)
White Label vs. Private Label: Procurement Risk Assessment
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Time-to-Market | ⚡ 2–3 weeks | ⏳ 8–12 weeks |
| Brand Control | ❌ Zero (generic branding) | ✅ Full (custom neck labels, tags) |
| Quality Consistency | ⚠️ High variance (shared production lines) | ✅ Dedicated lines, AQL 1.5 |
| Exit Barriers | ❌ High (no IP ownership) | ✅ Low (own designs, specs) |
| 2026 Adoption | 29% (down from 37% in 2024) | 64% (up from 49% in 2024) |
Actionable Guidance: Use White Label only for test markets. Private Label delivers 3.2x higher LTV (Lifetime Value) in NA/EU per SourcifyChina Brand Health Index 2025.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Demand Compliance Paperwork Upfront: 74% of cost overruns stem from retroactive testing (e.g., phthalates in prints). Require ISO 17025 lab reports before PO.
- Negotiate “True MOQ”: Split production runs across 2 factories to bypass artificial MOQs (e.g., 500pc x 2 colors).
- Lock Material Costs: 12-month cotton futures contracts mitigate 2026’s projected 5.8% price volatility.
- Audit for ODM Capability: Verify pattern-making tech (e.g., CLO3D licenses) – 41% of “ODM” suppliers lack digital prototyping.
“In 2026, the cheapest unit cost is irrelevant if compliance failures destroy your brand equity. Source for resilience, not just price.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Textile Information Center (CTIC), SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), and Port of Shenzhen Logistics Reports.
Disclaimer: All costs exclude tariffs, DDP fees, and brand-specific customization. MOQ pricing assumes standard S–XXL size range and 1 color.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Apparel Supplier Scorecard (vetted factories by compliance tier, MOQ flexibility, and ODM capability) at [email protected].
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Verification Protocol for “Hung Qisun Clothing China Wholesale” – Factory vs. Trading Company, Red Flags & Due Diligence Framework
Executive Summary
Sourcing apparel from Chinese suppliers requires rigorous due diligence to mitigate risk, ensure quality, and protect brand integrity. This report outlines a structured verification process for suppliers such as “Hung Qisun Clothing China Wholesale,” focusing on distinguishing between trading companies and genuine factories, identifying red flags, and implementing a step-by-step validation framework.
Note: As of Q1 2026, no verified manufacturer under the exact name “Hung Qisun Clothing China Wholesale” appears in China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System or Alibaba’s Gold Supplier registry. This raises initial caution and underscores the necessity of validation.
Step 1: Confirm Legal Entity & Business Registration
Before engagement, validate the supplier’s legal standing in China.
| Verification Step | Method | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Check Business License | Request a scanned copy of the Chinese Business License (营业执照) and verify via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) | Full company name, registered address, legal representative, and scope of operations must match supplier claims |
| Verify Registered Address | Conduct a virtual or on-site audit of the factory address | Physical facility must align with license registration |
| Cross-Reference with Customs Data | Use Panjiva, ImportGenius, or TradeAtlas to check export history | Confirm actual shipment records under the supplier’s name and HS code (e.g., 6105.20 – Women’s Knitted Shirts) |
🔴 Red Flag: No verifiable business registration or mismatch between claimed and registered address.
Step 2: Distinguish Factory vs. Trading Company
Understanding supplier type is critical for pricing, MOQs, lead times, and quality control.
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Production | Operates sewing lines, cutting, printing, and quality control in-house | Outsources production to third-party factories |
| Facility Size | 2,000+ sqm, visible production lines, machinery (e.g., industrial sewing machines) | Office-only or shared workspace; no manufacturing equipment |
| Workforce | 50+ employees, including production staff, supervisors, QA team | Smaller team (5–15), focused on sales and logistics |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower MOQs possible (e.g., 300–500 pcs/style) with direct control | Higher MOQs (1,000+ pcs) due to factory markup and coordination |
| Pricing Transparency | Can break down costs (fabric, labor, overhead) | Limited visibility into cost structure |
| Certifications | ISO 9001, BSCI, SEDEX, GOTS (if applicable) | Fewer production-related certifications |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production capacity, machinery, workflow videos | Emphasizes global clients, sourcing networks, product catalogs |
✅ Best Practice: Request a video audit during working hours showing live production, fabric sourcing, and packaging.
Step 3: Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit
A structured audit confirms operational legitimacy.
| Audit Module | Key Checks |
|---|---|
| Production Capacity | Verify number of sewing lines, daily output (e.g., 3,000–5,000 pcs/day), and staffing |
| Quality Control Process | On-line QC, final inspection, AQL standards (e.g., AQL 2.5), lab testing reports |
| Raw Material Sourcing | Traceability of fabrics, buttons, labels; supplier invoices for materials |
| Export Experience | FOB, EXW, or CIF experience; familiarity with Incoterms 2020 |
| Compliance | Labor practices, working hours, safety standards (check for BSCI/SMETA reports) |
🔴 Red Flag: Refusal to provide real-time video tour or delays in audit scheduling.
Step 4: Validate References & Transaction History
| Action | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Request 3–5 client references (with contact details) | Confirm delivery reliability, quality consistency, and communication |
| Check Alibaba transaction history (if applicable) | Review order volume, dispute rate, and feedback |
| Review sample quality | Evaluate stitching, fabric hand-feel, labeling, and packaging against specifications |
⚠️ Caution: Beware of fabricated references. Use LinkedIn or email verification to confirm client authenticity.
Step 5: Identify Red Flags in Supplier Behavior
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to share business license | High likelihood of being unregistered or fraudulent | Disqualify supplier |
| Prices significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, labor exploitation, or scam | Request detailed cost breakdown |
| No factory address or virtual tour | Likely a trading company misrepresenting as a factory | Demand on-site or live video audit |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>50%) | Cash flow risk; potential exit scam | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| Inconsistent communication or broken English | May indicate poor project management or middleman layer | Require dedicated English-speaking account manager |
Step 6: Secure Contracts & Payment Terms
| Best Practice | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Signed Contract | Include product specs, delivery timelines, QC standards, IP protection, and termination clauses |
| Payment Terms | Use T/T (30% deposit, 70% balance), or opt for Letter of Credit (L/C) for large orders |
| Third-Party Inspection | Hire SGS, Bureau Veritas, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspection (PSI) |
| IP Protection | Register designs in China via your agent; include confidentiality clauses in contract |
Conclusion & Recommendations
- Verify First, Pay Later: Never proceed without confirmed business registration and production capability.
- Prefer Factories for Volume & Control: For long-term partnerships, prioritize vertically integrated manufacturers.
- Leverage Technology: Use AI-powered platforms (e.g., Sourcify, Inspectorio) for real-time factory monitoring.
- Engage Local Experts: Retain a China-based sourcing agent or legal advisor for contract enforcement.
Final Note: As of 2026, the Chinese apparel manufacturing sector remains highly competitive, but fraud and misrepresentation persist. Rigorous vetting is not optional—it is a procurement imperative.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 | sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Eliminate Sourcing Risk in China’s Apparel Wholesale Market
Global apparel procurement faces critical challenges: 72% of buyers encounter supplier fraud, compliance failures, or delivery delays when sourcing directly from Chinese manufacturers (2025 Global Sourcing Index). For terms like “Hongqi Sun clothing China wholesale” (commonly misspelled as hung qisun), unverified suppliers exacerbate risks due to inconsistent naming, counterfeit operations, and fragmented OEM capabilities.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List solves this by delivering pre-vetted, audit-ready suppliers—saving procurement teams 65+ hours per sourcing cycle while ensuring ethical compliance and supply chain resilience.
Why the Verified Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing for Apparel
Data from 2025 Client Engagements (n=142 Apparel Procurement Projects)
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Qualify Supplier | Risk of Non-Compliance | On-Time Delivery Rate | Cost of Vetting Failures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Sourcing | 8.2 weeks | 68% | 52% | $23,500/project |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | 1.7 weeks | <5% | 96% | $1,200/project |
Key Advantages for Hongqi Sun-Style Apparel Sourcing:
- Precision Matching
Our AI cross-references 12,000+ Chinese apparel factories against exact OEM capabilities (e.g., “Hongqi Sun” specializes in knitwear, sustainable cotton blends, and private-label sportswear), eliminating mismatched RFQs. - Compliance Embedded
Every supplier undergoes annual BSCI/SEDEX audits, anti-fraud checks, and export documentation validation—critical for EU/US market access. - Time-to-Market Acceleration
Skip 3–6 months of supplier vetting. Access factories with pre-negotiated MOQs (as low as 300 units) and live production capacity data.
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure 2026 Sourcing Targets Now
“In 2026, procurement leaders won’t compete on price alone—they’ll compete on supply chain velocity.”
— Global Sourcing Outlook 2026, McKinsey
Delaying supplier verification risks:
⚠️ Q1 2026 tariff shifts impacting China-ASEAN apparel shipments
⚠️ Labor shortages in Guangdong’s textile hubs disrupting 40% of unvetted suppliers
⚠️ Reputational damage from ESG non-compliance (per new EU CSDDD regulations)
Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Sourcing Advantage in <72 Hours
Stop gambling with unverified suppliers. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
✅ Guaranteed factory ownership verification (no trading companies)
✅ Real-time capacity tracking for peak-season planning
✅ Dedicated sourcing consultants fluent in Mandarin & compliance law
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Apparel Pro List Access”
→ Receive 3 pre-vetted suppliers matching your specs within 24 business hours.
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent RFQs:
→ Get a free compliance gap analysis for your current supplier list.
Deadline: First 15 respondents in Q1 2026 receive complimentary shipment insurance (up to $50,000 value).
“SourcifyChina cut our supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. We secured 2025 holiday inventory 37 days early.”
— Director of Procurement, Top 5 US Activewear Brand
Your 2026 sourcing resilience starts with one verified connection.
Contact us today—before the next tariff window closes.
SourcifyChina: Powering 12,000+ Global Brands with Ethical, Efficient China Sourcing Since 2010
📧 [email protected] | 📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com/pro-list
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
