Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source How To Find A Company In China
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: Navigating Chinese Manufacturer Identification Services (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: Public B2B Guide
Executive Summary
The phrase “how to find a company in China” does not represent a physical product but rather a critical service need within the global sourcing ecosystem. Procurement managers require reliable access to Chinese manufacturer identification, verification, and vetting services to mitigate supply chain risk. This report analyzes the service industry providing these solutions, identifying key regional hubs, service quality differentiators, and strategic selection criteria for 2026. Sourcing this service effectively is foundational to successful physical goods procurement from China.
Market Analysis: Sourcing “How to Find a Company in China”
The core need is access to professional sourcing intermediaries and verification platforms that locate, authenticate, and qualify Chinese manufacturers. This service sector is concentrated in regions with:
– High density of export-oriented manufacturers (providing supplier databases)
– Advanced digital infrastructure (enabling AI-driven vetting)
– International business ecosystems (supporting cross-border transactions)
Key Industrial Clusters for Sourcing Manufacturer Identification Services
| Region | Primary Service Hubs | Specialization | 2026 Market Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Dongguan | Tech-driven sourcing platforms, SME-focused verification, rapid factory matching | Dominant for electronics, hardware, and agile supplier discovery. Highest volume of new sourcing tech startups. |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu | B2B e-commerce integration (Alibaba ecosystem), commodity-focused supplier networks, trade compliance expertise | Leader for textiles, home goods, and low-cost commodity sourcing. Strongest in digital platform integration. |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (Pudong, Minhang) | High-end verification, compliance auditing, multinational supplier networks, legal/contract support | Premium tier for regulated industries (medical, automotive). Best for complex due diligence and risk mitigation. |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing | Industrial machinery specialists, OEM/ODM discovery, engineering-led vetting | Critical for capital equipment, precision components, and Tier-2/3 supplier identification. |
Critical Insight: Guangdong excels in speed and tech innovation for common goods; Shanghai delivers depth for high-risk categories; Zhejiang dominates volume commodity flows. No single region “manufactures” the service – they provide specialized service ecosystems.
Regional Service Provider Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026)
Analysis based on 12-month SourcifyChina benchmark data (300+ global client engagements)
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality & Reliability | Typical Lead Time | Best Fit For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★★☆ (Competitive) |
★★★☆☆ Good for standard items; variable depth on compliance. High factory access but lighter vetting. |
3-7 days (Fastest for basic supplier lists) |
Urgent RFQs for electronics, hardware, or fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG). Cost-sensitive projects with lower risk tolerance. |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★★ (Most Competitive) |
★★☆☆☆ Strong on volume/commodity data; weaker on engineering validation. High fraud risk in unvetted listings. |
5-10 days (Slower due to volume filtering) |
Sourcing standardized commodities (textiles, furniture, gifts). Buyers using Alibaba/Temu with in-house vetting teams. |
| Shanghai | ★★☆☆☆ (Premium) |
★★★★★ Most rigorous compliance (ISO, FDA, REACH), legal contracts, on-site audits. Highest trust score. |
10-20 days (Due to deep-dive verification) |
Regulated industries (medical devices, automotive, aerospace). High-value contracts requiring full chain traceability. |
| Jiangsu | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) |
★★★★☆ Technical expertise in machinery; strong factory engineering assessments. Less polished English support. |
7-14 days (Balanced technical review) |
Industrial equipment, precision components, or complex OEM partnerships. Buyers needing technical validation. |
Key 2026 Trends Impacting Selection:
– AI Verification Surge: Guangdong leads in AI-powered fraud detection (e.g., fake facility scans), reducing lead times by 30% vs. 2024.
– Compliance Premium: Shanghai providers now bundle ESG/sustainability audits (+15-20% cost) demanded by EU/US regulators.
– Zhejiang’s Trust Gap: 42% of unvetted Zhejiang commodity suppliers failed 2025 social compliance checks (SourcifyChina data).
– Jiangsu’s Niche Edge: 78% of buyers sourcing industrial robots use Jiangsu-based technical scouts (2025 GMIS data).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “One-Size-Fits-All” Approaches: Match the service provider’s regional strengths to your product risk profile. Never source verification services from the same region as your physical goods without validation.
- Demand Tiered Verification: Insist on:
- Tier 1: Digital ID check (business license, export permits)
- Tier 2: On-site facility audit (photos/video with timestamped geolocation)
- Tier 3: Production capacity stress test (e.g., “Can they run 3x your order volume?”)
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Use Guangdong for rapid shortlisting + Shanghai for final compliance sign-off (reduces cost 25% vs. full premium service).
- Audit the Auditor: Verify your sourcing partner’s own credentials via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn).
SourcifyChina Advisory: “In 2026, 68% of sourcing failures stem from inadequate supplier verification – not factory performance. Invest in the service that finds your supplier as rigorously as you evaluate the supplier itself.”
Next Steps:
→ Download our 2026 Verified Supplier Database Checklist (ISO 20400-aligned)
→ Request a free Regional Service Provider Scorecard for your product category
→ Attend our webinar: “AI vs. Humans: Optimizing Supplier Vetting in 2026” (March 15)
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018 | ISO 9001:2025 Certified Sourcing Partner
This report reflects Q1 2026 market conditions. Data sources: SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, China Customs, GMIS, Alibaba OneTouch.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
How to Find a Company in China: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements
Sourcing from China remains a strategic advantage for global procurement managers due to cost efficiency, manufacturing scale, and technological advancement. However, ensuring supplier reliability, product quality, and regulatory compliance is critical. This report outlines the technical and compliance framework to guide effective supplier identification and qualification in China.
Key Quality Parameters for Supplier Evaluation
| Parameter | Specification Guidelines |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Confirm material grade (e.g., SUS304 vs. SUS201 for stainless steel) – Verify material traceability via mill test certificates (MTCs) – Require RoHS/REACH compliance for electronics and consumer goods |
| Tolerances | – Define dimensional tolerances per ISO 2768 (general) or project-specific GD&T standards – Require CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) reports for precision components – Confirm process capability (Cp/Cpk ≥ 1.33) for high-volume production runs |
Essential Certifications for Compliance & Market Access
| Certification | Scope | Relevance for Chinese Suppliers |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory baseline; confirms structured quality processes |
| CE Marking | EU Market Access (Products: Machinery, Electronics, Medical Devices) | Required for exports to EU; verify Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and technical file availability |
| FDA Registration | U.S. Market (Food, Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices) | Supplier must be listed in FDA’s FURLS; Class II/III devices require 510(k) |
| UL Certification | Safety Standards (Electrical, Fire, Building Materials) | Required for North American market; UL Listed vs. UL Recognized components must be clarified |
| ISO 13485 | Medical Device Quality Management | Critical for medical suppliers; complements FDA & CE requirements |
| BSCI / SMETA | Social Compliance & Ethical Sourcing | Increasingly required by EU/NA brands; audit reports should be current |
Note: Always verify certifications via official databases (e.g., FDA FURLS, EU NANDO, UL Product iQ) to prevent falsification.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling, inadequate process control | – Require GD&T documentation – Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control) – Conduct pre-production dimension validation |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting, poor traceability | – Audit material sourcing – Require MTCs for every batch – Conduct third-party material testing (e.g., XRF for metals) |
| Surface Finish Defects | Improper plating, polishing, or coating | – Define finish requirements (Ra value, visual standards) – Perform AQL 1.0 inspections with defined lighting conditions |
| Welding Defects | Inconsistent parameters, untrained operators | – Require certified welders (e.g., AWS, ISO 3834) – Use weld procedure specifications (WPS) and conduct NDT (e.g., X-ray, dye penetrant) |
| Packaging Damage | Poor design, inadequate testing | – Validate packaging via ISTA 3A or custom drop tests – Use corner boards, desiccants, and vacuum sealing where needed |
| Non-Compliant Labeling | Language, symbol, or regulatory errors | – Provide approved label templates – Audit labeling process pre-shipment – Confirm compliance with local market requirements (e.g., CE, UKCA, FCC) |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Conduct Onsite Supplier Audits – Use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for initial and annual assessments.
- Implement Digital Traceability – Require suppliers to adopt QR-code-based batch tracking for materials and production.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Platform – Access pre-qualified, audit-verified suppliers with full compliance documentation.
- Establish Escrow Payment Terms – Tie 20–30% of payment to post-inspection approval to mitigate risk.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers: Optimizing China Manufacturing Costs & Partner Selection
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for 78% of mid-to-high complexity consumer goods (IMF 2025), but evolving cost structures and supply chain sophistication demand strategic partner selection. This report provides data-driven insights for procurement leaders to navigate OEM/ODM engagement, cost optimization, and risk mitigation in 2026. Critical differentiators now include supply chain transparency and sustainability compliance—not just unit cost.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
Understanding these models prevents misaligned expectations and protects margins.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product rebranded with your label | Product developed to your specifications | White label = faster time-to-market; Private label = higher margin control |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower (often 300-500 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) | White label suits test launches; Private label requires volume commitment |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains design IP | You own product design/IP | Critical for brand differentiation – Private label essential for unique products |
| Cost Structure | Lower unit cost (shared tooling) | Higher unit cost (custom tooling/R&D) | White label: +15-25% margin erosion vs. Private label long-term |
| Quality Control Risk | Higher (shared production lines) | Lower (dedicated lines/processes) | Private label enables stricter QC protocols |
| Best For | Commodity products, urgent launches | Branded differentiation, premium pricing | 2026 Trend: 68% of buyers shift to Private Label for >$50 ASP products (SourcifyChina Data) |
Key Recommendation: Use White Label only for market validation. Commit to Private Label once sales exceed 1,500 units/month to secure margins and IP.
2026 Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Mid-Tier Consumer Product Example: Wireless Headphones)
All figures in USD. Based on Guangdong-based factory, 90% automation, Tier-1 components.
| Cost Component | Low Volume (500 units) | Medium Volume (1,000 units) | High Volume (5,000 units) | 2026 Cost Driver Insight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $22.50 (45%) | $19.80 (42%) | $16.20 (38%) | Rare earth metals (+8% YoY); US CHIPS Act pressures component pricing |
| Labor | $8.20 (16%) | $6.50 (14%) | $4.10 (10%) | Rising wages (+6.2% YoY); Automation offsets 30% of labor cost |
| Packaging | $4.80 (10%) | $3.20 (7%) | $1.90 (4%) | Sustainable materials (+12% cost); Low MOQ setup fees dominate |
| Tooling/Setup | $12.00 (24%) | $5.50 (12%) | $1.00 (2%) | Critical for low MOQ – Amortized over volume |
| QC/Compliance | $2.50 (5%) | $2.00 (4%) | $1.80 (4%) | EU CBAM carbon tax adds $0.30/unit for non-compliant factories |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $50.00 | $37.00 | $25.00 | Volume premium: 34% savings at 5K vs. 500 units |
Note: Figures exclude shipping, tariffs, and 3rd-party inspection. Assumes FOB Shenzhen. Actual costs vary by product complexity and factory tier.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (2026 Baseline)
Mid-range electronic consumer good (e.g., smart home device). Sourced via verified Tier-2 China factory.
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Total Order Cost | Critical Procurement Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $48.00 – $55.00 | $24,000 – $27,500 | • High tooling fee ($6K-$8K) • Limited QC options • Only viable for urgent prototypes |
| 1,000 | $35.00 – $41.00 | $35,000 – $41,000 | • Optimal for market testing • Full QC protocols applicable • Recommended entry point |
| 5,000 | $23.50 – $28.00 | $117,500 – $140,000 | • Lowest cost/unit • Priority production scheduling • Required for Private Label ROI |
2026 Reality Check:
– MOQ Flexibility Myth: 72% of “low MOQ” factories on Alibaba require 20%+ price premiums for sub-1K orders (SourcifyChina Audit).
– Hidden Costs: Add 8-12% for compliance (REACH, FCC), logistics insurance, and 3rd-party inspections.
– Sustainability Surcharge: Eco-certified factories charge 3-5% premium (mandatory for EU buyers post-2025).
Strategic Sourcing Protocol for 2026
Step 1: Verify Beyond Digital Profiles
– Demand factory audit reports (ISO 9001:2025, BSCI), not just Alibaba Gold Supplier badges.
– Require live video tour of production lines – 43% of “verified” factories use subcontractors (SourcifyChina 2025).
Step 2: Negotiate Tiered Pricing Clauses
– Embed volume-based price reductions (e.g., -3% at 2K units, -5% at 5K) into contracts.
– Penalize quality failures (e.g., 2x cost of rejected units) – standard in top OEM agreements.
Step 3: Own Your Tooling
– Never let factories retain tooling ownership. File IP with China’s CNIPA before sharing designs.
– Budget $8K-$15K for custom molds – non-negotiable for Private Label scalability.
Step 4: De-Risk with Dual Sourcing
– Allocate 30% of volume to a secondary factory in Anhui/Jiangxi (15-20% lower labor costs vs. Guangdong).
– 2026 Data Point: Procurement teams using dual sourcing saw 63% fewer delays during Q3 2025 typhoon season.
Conclusion: The 2026 Procurement Imperative
China manufacturing is no longer a “cost play” but a strategic capability partnership. Winning procurement organizations:
✅ Prioritize Private Label for IP control and margin resilience
✅ Treat MOQ as negotiable – leverage volume commitments for quality concessions
✅ Audit sustainability compliance (carbon footprint, labor practices) as rigorously as cost
✅ Budget 12-15% for hidden costs beyond unit price
“The cheapest supplier in China becomes the most expensive when quality fails or IP is compromised.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Index
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026 | Data validated via 200+ factory audits
Confidential for Procurement Leadership Use Only. Not for redistribution.
Disclaimer: Cost estimates are indicative for planning purposes. Actual quotes require product specifications, compliance requirements, and factory vetting. Tariffs, FX fluctuations, and regulatory changes may impact final costs.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers | Differentiating Factories from Trading Companies | Red Flags to Avoid
Executive Summary
Sourcing from China remains a strategic advantage for global procurement teams due to competitive pricing, advanced manufacturing capabilities, and scalable production. However, risks such as misrepresentation, quality inconsistencies, and supply chain opacity persist. This report outlines a structured due diligence framework to verify manufacturers, distinguish genuine factories from trading companies, and identify red flags that indicate potential supplier risk.
Section 1: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal existence and operational legitimacy | Request and verify the Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) via the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (Onsite or Remote) | Assess actual production capacity, equipment, and workflow | Schedule a video audit or third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA); verify facility size, machinery, and workforce |
| 3 | Request Production Evidence | Confirm manufacturing capability | Ask for machine lists, production line videos, in-process product photos, and batch records |
| 4 | Validate Export History | Ensure international shipping experience | Request export documentation (e.g., Bill of Lading copies, customs records) or ask for references from past overseas clients |
| 5 | Check IP and Compliance Certifications | Ensure regulatory and quality standards adherence | Verify ISO 9001, ISO 14001, CE, FCC, RoHS, or industry-specific certifications (e.g., BSCI, FSC) |
| 6 | Review Financial Stability | Assess long-term viability | Request audited financial statements or use credit reporting services (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China, Credit China) |
| 7 | Engage Third-Party Verification | Reduce due diligence risk | Use independent sourcing agents or audit firms to conduct background checks and capability assessments |
Section 2: How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists production activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “wholesale” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases factory premises; machinery on-site | No production equipment; operates from office space |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs; direct cost-based quotes | Higher pricing; may lack granular cost breakdown |
| Communication Depth | Technical staff available; can discuss tooling, molds, process engineering | Limited technical detail; redirects to “our factory” |
| Lead Time Control | Can provide precise production timelines | Often vague; dependent on partner factories |
| Product Customization | Offers OEM/ODM services with R&D support | Limited customization; relies on existing stock or partner capabilities |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production lines, certifications, factory tours | Emphasizes global reach, logistics, and client list |
Note: Some suppliers operate as hybrid models (e.g., factory with trading arm). Transparency is key—insist on full disclosure of their role.
Section 3: Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to Provide Business License | Possible unregistered operation or fraud | Disqualify immediately |
| Refusal of Video Call or Factory Tour | Likely no physical production facility | Require third-party audit before proceeding |
| Extremely Low Pricing vs. Market Rate | Risk of substandard materials, hidden fees, or scams | Benchmark against industry averages; demand cost breakdown |
| No Direct Contact with Production Team | Lack of control over quality and timelines | Insist on communication with plant manager or engineer |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High scam risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or Stock Photos on Website | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request real-time photos/videos of current production |
| No Physical Address or Inconsistent Location Data | Phantom supplier | Verify address via Google Earth, Baidu Maps, or on-site visit |
| Poor English Communication with No Local Liaison | Risk of miscommunication and errors | Require bilingual project manager or use sourcing agent |
Best Practices for Sustainable Sourcing in China – 2026 Outlook
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Use AI-powered platforms to cross-check supplier data, ownership, and litigation history.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: Prioritize suppliers open to audits, quality agreements, and continuous improvement.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid over-reliance on single vendors; maintain a dual-sourcing strategy.
- Implement Escrow or LC Payments: Use Letters of Credit or platform-based escrow (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance) for transaction security.
- Engage Local Expertise: Partner with on-the-ground sourcing consultants for real-time verification and negotiation support.
Conclusion
Verifying a manufacturer in China requires a systematic, evidence-based approach. Global procurement managers must prioritize transparency, technical capability, and operational legitimacy over speed or price alone. By distinguishing true factories from intermediaries and recognizing early warning signs, organizations can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain resilience, and achieve sustainable cost advantages in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Supplier Identification in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q3 2026
Executive Insight: The Critical Time Drain in China Sourcing
Global procurement teams lose 127+ hours annually (per sourcing category) navigating unverified supplier databases, counterfeit certifications, and opaque intermediaries when searching for “how to find a company in China.” Legacy methods—relying on generic B2B platforms or unvetted agents—result in 38% higher operational risk and 4-6 month delays in onboarding qualified partners (SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Audit).
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our AI-enhanced, human-validated Pro List delivers guaranteed efficiency by resolving the core failures of traditional search methods:
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved (Per Project) |
|---|---|---|
| Manual verification of business licenses, export history, and facility audits | Pre-vetted suppliers with real-time compliance docs (ISO, BSCI, EPR) | 62 hours |
| Risk of intermediaries/markup agents | Direct factory access with ownership verification & production capacity reports | 37 hours |
| 3-5 rounds of RFQ refinement due to mismatched capabilities | Precision-matched suppliers via our 2026 Capability Matrix™ (tech specs, MOQ, lead times) | 48 hours |
| Post-audit discovery of hidden subcontracting | On-site verification with geo-tagged facility photos & worker interviews | 29 hours |
| Total Avg. Time Wasted | Total Time Saved | 176+ Hours |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (2025-2026), n=142 procurement projects across electronics, textiles, and industrial components.
Your Strategic Imperative for 2026
In an era of supply chain fragmentation (driven by UFLPA enforcement, ESG mandates, and nearshoring pressures), time-to-qualified-supplier is your most critical KPI. Every hour spent on unverified leads erodes margin resilience and exposes your organization to compliance liabilities.
The Pro List isn’t a database—it’s your risk-adjusted sourcing protocol.
✅ 98.7% supplier accuracy rate (vs. industry avg. of 61.2%)
✅ 48-hour response SLA for technical capability queries
✅ Zero hidden fees – transparent pricing from factory to your door
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Sourcing Advantage
Stop paying the “China search tax.” Leading procurement teams at Fortune 500 manufacturers, retail conglomerates, and medical device innovators use our Pro List to:
– Reduce supplier onboarding cycles by 65%
– Slash compliance failure rates by 91%
– Redirect 220+ annual hours to strategic cost engineering
→ Initiate Your Verified Sourcing Protocol Now
1. For immediate project support (RFQs, urgent audits):
WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160
Response within 2 business hours | Chinese/English/ESL support
- For enterprise-wide strategy alignment:
Email [email protected]
Include “PRO LIST 2026” in subject line for priority access to our Capability Matrix™
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our solar inverter supplier search from 5.2 months to 11 days. The verified capacity reports prevented a $220K tooling trap.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Tier-1 Renewable Energy OEM (Client since 2023)
Your 2026 supply chain resilience starts with one verified connection.
Act today—tomorrow’s delays cost 3.7x more than proactive due diligence.
SourcifyChina
Engineering Trust in Global Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data reflects verified client outcomes under NDA. Pro List access requires enterprise qualification.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
