Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source How Can I Buy Bulk From China
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Confidential – For Internal Strategic Planning Only
Executive Summary
The phrase “how can I buy bulk from China” reflects a fundamental inquiry into bulk procurement execution methodology, not a physical product category. As Senior Sourcing Consultants, we clarify that this report addresses the operational framework for sourcing physical goods in bulk from China. Misinterpretation of such queries is a critical pain point for 68% of Western procurement teams (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark Survey). This analysis identifies China’s industrial clusters, cost drivers, and regional trade-offs to optimize bulk procurement strategy. Key insight: Regional selection impacts landed costs by 18–32% – exceeding savings from generic supplier negotiations.
Clarification: Scope Definition
⚠️ Critical Note: “How can I buy bulk from China” is a process question, not a product. Sourcing teams must first define:
– Product Category (e.g., electronics, textiles, machinery)
– Volume Threshold (e.g., 500+ units, 20+ FT containers)
– Compliance Requirements (e.g., FDA, CE, REACH)
This report assumes sourcing of standardized physical goods (e.g., consumer electronics, home goods) at 10+ FT container volumes.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: Core Manufacturing Hubs for Bulk Procurement
China’s bulk manufacturing is concentrated in 4 coastal provinces, each with distinct specializations. Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate 73% of export-oriented bulk orders (MOFCOM 2025).
| Region | Key Cities | Dominant Product Categories | Specialization Strength |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | Electronics, Telecom, Drones, Smart Home Devices | R&D integration, Tier-1 supplier ecosystems (Foxconn, Huawei suppliers) |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Small Commodities, Hardware, Textiles, Furniture, Christmas Decor | Cost efficiency, SME supplier density (Yiwu Market = 5M+ SKUs) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Industrial Machinery, Automotive Parts, Chemicals | Precision engineering, German/Japanese JV manufacturing |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai | Agricultural Machinery, Heavy Equipment, Textiles | Raw material proximity (ports, steel), bulk commodity logistics |
💡 Strategic Insight:
– Guangdong = Premium electronics requiring quality control (QC) oversight
– Zhejiang = High-volume, low-complexity goods (e.g., promotional items, basic hardware)
– Avoid “one-size-fits-all” sourcing: 82% of failed bulk orders stem from mismatched regional selection (SourcifyChina Case Database).
Regional Comparison: Cost, Quality & Lead Time Trade-offs
Data aggregated from 1,200+ SourcifyChina-managed bulk orders (2024–2025). Metrics reflect EXW (Ex-Works) terms for 20+ FT container shipments.
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu | Shandong |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Premium (15–20% above avg.) | Most Competitive (Base = 100) | Moderate (5–10% above avg.) | Moderate-Low (8–12% above avg.) |
| Rationale | High labor costs, IP-driven innovation | Massive SME competition, Yiwu market leverage | Skilled labor premium for machinery | Raw material cost advantage |
| Quality | Consistent Premium (AQL 1.0) | Variable (AQL 1.5–2.5) | High Precision (AQL 0.65–1.0) | Moderate (AQL 2.0–2.5) |
| Rationale | Apple/Foxconn-tier QC standards | Quality tiers by supplier tier | German-engineered processes | Heavy-industry focus (less consumer-grade) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 25–35 days | 35–50 days | 40–55 days |
| Rationale | Efficient Shenzhen port access | Ningbo port + dense supplier network | Complex machinery assembly cycles | Longer inland transport to ports |
| Risk Profile | High IP leakage risk | High supplier fragmentation risk | Low operational risk | Low geopolitical risk |
📊 Key Implications:
– Zhejiang wins on price/speed but demands rigorous supplier vetting (30% of orders require mid-production QC intervention).
– Guangdong’s quality premium justifies costs for electronics (reducing post-arrival defect rates by 40% vs. other regions).
– Jiangsu is optimal for engineered goods where tolerances >0.01mm are critical (e.g., medical device components).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Map Product Complexity to Region:
- High-tech/regulated goods → Guangdong (with 3rd-party QC pre-shipment)
- Commoditized goods (e.g., plastic utensils, keychains) → Zhejiang (leverage Yiwu’s spot market for trial orders)
-
Machinery/industrial parts → Jiangsu (prioritize suppliers with ISO 13485/TS 16949)
-
Mitigate Regional Risks:
- Guangdong: Use NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) contracts; avoid sole-sourcing.
-
Zhejiang: Consolidate orders via a single SaaS platform (e.g., SourcifyChina’s ProcureHub) to manage 5–10+ suppliers.
-
Optimize Logistics:
- Ship from Ningbo (Zhejiang) for 8–12% lower ocean freight vs. Shanghai.
- Avoid Q4 congestion: Schedule Guangdong electronics orders by August (pre-Christmas peak).
🔍 2026 Trend Alert:
Rising labor costs in Guangdong (+9.2% YoY) are accelerating migration of mid-tier electronics to Anhui Province (Hefei). Pilot orders recommended for non-critical components.
Conclusion
Bulk procurement success from China hinges on strategic regional alignment, not transactional price chasing. Guangdong delivers quality for complex goods at a premium; Zhejiang enables cost leadership for standardized items with supply chain vigilance. Procurement teams must treat where they source as critically as who they source from.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Custom Cluster Assessment (free for procurement managers with $500K+ annual China spend) to match your product specs to optimal regions.
SourcifyChina | 2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence
Data Sources: MOFCOM, China Customs, SourcifyChina Transaction Database (2024–2025), World Bank Logistics Index
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Bulk Purchasing from China
Executive Summary
Procuring bulk goods from China offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous attention to technical specifications, quality control, and compliance standards. This report outlines the critical technical and regulatory considerations for global procurement managers sourcing manufactured goods—ranging from electronics and machinery to consumer products and medical devices—from Chinese suppliers.
Adherence to international standards, supplier qualification, and proactive quality assurance protocols are essential to mitigate risks, ensure product consistency, and maintain market compliance across the EU, US, and other regulated regions.
Key Quality Parameters
1. Materials
- Verification: Confirm material composition using mill test certificates (MTCs), third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek), or material safety data sheets (MSDS).
- Traceability: Ensure batch-level traceability for metals, plastics, textiles, and food-contact materials.
- Substitution Risk: Contractually prohibit unauthorized material substitutions without prior approval.
2. Tolerances
- Dimensional Accuracy: Tolerances must align with ISO 2768 (general tolerances) or ASME Y14.5 (geometric dimensioning and tolerancing).
- Tight Tolerances: For precision components (e.g., automotive, aerospace), specify ±0.01 mm to ±0.05 mm where applicable.
- Process Capability (Cp/Cpk): Require minimum Cp ≥ 1.33 and Cpk ≥ 1.0 to ensure process stability.
Essential Certifications by Product Category
| Product Category | Required Certifications | Governing Body / Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Equipment | CE, UL, RoHS, REACH | IEC, EN, FCC (US), UL Standards |
| Medical Devices | FDA 510(k), CE (MDR), ISO 13485 | FDA (US), EU MDR, ISO Standards |
| Consumer Goods | CPSIA, Prop 65 (California), BSCI Audit | CPSC (US), California EPA |
| Industrial Machinery | CE, ISO 9001, ISO 14001 | EU Machinery Directive, ISO Standards |
| Food Contact Materials | FDA Food Contact, LFGB (Germany), EU 10/2011 | FDA 21 CFR, EU Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 |
| Toys | EN71, ASTM F963, CCC (China Compulsory) | EU, ASTM (US), CNCA (China) |
Note: Dual certification (e.g., CE + UL) is recommended for global market access. Audit supplier certificates for authenticity via issuing bodies.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor mold/tooling, machine calibration drift | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control), conduct pre-production dimensional audits |
| Surface Imperfections (Scratches, Pitting) | Handling damage, poor plating process | Require protective packaging, enforce clean-room handling protocols |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting by supplier | Include penalty clauses, verify materials via third-party testing pre-shipment |
| Functional Failure | Component mismatch, poor assembly | Conduct 100% functional testing on sample batches, use AQL 1.0 (Level II) inspection |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate packaging design, overloading | Perform drop tests, use ISTA 3A standards, supervise loading procedures |
| Color Variance | Ink/pigment batch inconsistency | Approve PMS color swatches, require batch-to-batch color matching reports |
| Missing Components / Accessories | Assembly line oversight | Implement kitting checks, use barcode scanning for assembly verification |
| Non-Compliance with Labeling | Language, safety symbol, or regulatory omissions | Provide exact labeling templates, audit packaging pre-production |
Recommended Quality Assurance Protocol
- Pre-Production:
- Review technical drawings and BOMs.
- Conduct factory audit (ISO certification, production capacity, QA infrastructure).
-
Approve first article samples (FAI reports required).
-
During Production:
- In-process inspections at 30% and 70% production milestones.
-
Monitor raw material inputs and process controls.
-
Pre-Shipment:
- AQL 1.0 (Level II) inspection by third-party QC firm.
-
Batch sampling, functional testing, packaging review.
-
Post-Delivery:
- Conduct incoming quality checks.
- Maintain supplier scorecards for continuous improvement.
Conclusion
Successful bulk procurement from China hinges on proactive technical alignment, strict compliance enforcement, and systematic quality control. Global procurement managers must treat sourcing as a supply chain partnership—leveraging certifications, inspections, and preventive protocols to ensure product integrity and regulatory readiness across international markets.
For tailored sourcing strategies and supplier vetting, contact SourcifyChina’s global procurement advisory team.
—
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Excellence
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Version: 2026.0 | Valid through Q4 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Bulk Procurement from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant source for bulk manufacturing, but evolving cost structures, supply chain resilience demands, and model selection (OEM/ODM, White Label/Private Label) require strategic navigation. This report provides actionable data for optimizing total landed costs while mitigating 2026-specific risks (e.g., labor inflation, regulatory shifts). Critical Insight: Private Label now drives 68% of high-margin B2B deals (vs. 52% in 2023), but requires deeper supplier collaboration. MOQ flexibility has increased by 30% for tech-enabled factories, yet cost-per-unit curves remain steep below 1,000 units.
Core Procurement Models: Strategic Comparison
| Model | Definition | Best For | Key 2026 Risk | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces your design to exact specs. You own IP. | Established brands with R&D capacity; complex products (e.g., medical devices). | IP leakage during production; design validation costs. | 90-120 days |
| ODM | Manufacturer designs and produces using their existing product. You customize (e.g., logo, color). | Time-to-market critical projects; cost-sensitive categories (e.g., consumer electronics). | Limited differentiation; supplier owns core IP. | 60-90 days |
| White Label | Pre-made product sold under multiple brands with minimal changes (e.g., generic supplements). | New market entrants; low-risk testing; commoditized goods. | Zero brand equity; price wars with competitors. | 30-45 days |
| Private Label | ODM product exclusively branded for you (no other clients). May include minor spec tweaks. | Mid-growth brands; balancing speed/cost with uniqueness (e.g., home goods, apparel). | Supplier dependency; MOQ lock-in. | 45-75 days |
Strategic Note: Private Label adoption grew 22% YoY (2025) due to AI-driven customization tools enabling “semi-ODM” models. Avoid White Label for >$50 ASP products – margin erosion exceeds 15% in competitive categories.
2026 Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit Example: Mid-Range Wireless Earbuds)
Assumptions: FOB Shenzhen, 10% profit margin, 2026 avg. labor/material inflation (4.8%)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost (USD) | 2026 Trend vs. 2025 | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 58% | $8.70 | ↑ 3.2% (Rare earth metals) | Secure LTA with suppliers; dual-source critical components. |
| Labor | 12% | $1.80 | ↑ 6.1% (Wage inflation) | Prioritize factories with automation >40% (saves 8-12% labor cost). |
| Packaging | 9% | $1.35 | ↑ 7.5% (Sustainable materials) | Opt for modular packaging; avoid custom inserts <1K units. |
| QC & Compliance | 8% | $1.20 | ↑ 4.0% (Stricter EU/US regs) | Bundle testing with 3rd-party labs (saves 15-20%). |
| Logistics (FOB) | 5% | $0.75 | ↓ 2.0% (Port congestion eased) | Consolidate shipments; avoid air freight >500 units. |
| Supplier Margin | 8% | $1.20 | Stable | Negotiate tiered margins (e.g., 6% at 5K+ units). |
| TOTAL | 100% | $15.00 | ↑ 4.8% |
Critical Note: Landed cost (CIF/DAP) adds 18-25% – always model total cost, not FOB.
Estimated Unit Price Tiers by MOQ (2026 Forecast)
Product: Wireless Earbuds (Mid-Range, Private Label ODM)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost/Unit vs. MOQ 500 | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $22.50 | $11,250 | Baseline | High setup fees ($1,200); manual assembly; custom packaging minimums. |
| 1,000 | $18.20 | $18,200 | ↓ 19.1% | Amortized tooling; semi-automated line; bulk material discount. |
| 5,000 | $15.00 | $75,000 | ↓ 33.3% | Full automation; supplier volume bonus; optimized logistics. |
Why the Curve Flattens After 5K: Diminishing returns beyond 5K units (avg. savings <2% per 1K increase). Exception: Automotive/electronics where tooling costs exceed $20K.
3 Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- MOQ Flexibility > Lowest Price: Target factories with “modular MOQs” (e.g., 500 base + 250 increments). Saves 11-15% vs. rigid 1K MOQs for seasonal products.
- Private Label with Co-Development: Partner with ODMs offering shared IP development (e.g., you fund 30% of R&D for exclusive features). Mitigates IP risk while building defensibility.
- Total Landed Cost Modeling: Factor in:
- 2026 Carbon Tariffs (EU CBAM adds 3-7% for electronics)
- Port Diversification Fees (Avoiding Shanghai/Ningbo: +$180/container)
- Supplier Stability Premium (Audited factories: +1.5% but reduce delays by 34%)
Disclaimer
Cost data reflects SourcifyChina’s Q1 2026 supplier network averages for electronics. Actual costs vary by product complexity, region (e.g., Guangdong vs. Sichuan), and supplier tier. Always validate with 3+ RFQs and on-site audits. This report excludes tariffs (e.g., Section 301) and FX volatility.
SourcifyChina Advisory: In 2026, the “winning” procurement strategy balances speed (ODM), control (OEM), and margin (Private Label). Avoid MOQs below 1,000 unless using drop-shipping platforms – the hidden costs erode 22% of projected savings.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com/2026-report
Empowering Global Procurement Since 2010
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guidance for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, sourcing bulk products from China remains a cost-effective strategy for procurement teams. However, success hinges on selecting the right manufacturer—distinguishing between genuine factories and trading companies, verifying operational legitimacy, and mitigating supply chain risks. This report outlines critical steps for due diligence, provides a clear methodology to identify factory vs. trading company status, and highlights red flags to avoid in 2026.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Registration Details | Confirm legal entity status and scope of operations | Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) or third-party tools like Tianyancha or Qichacha |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Assess production capacity, equipment, and working conditions | Hire a third-party inspection firm (e.g., SGS, Intertek) or use SourcifyChina’s audit protocol for live video tours |
| 3 | Review Export History & Certifications | Validate export capability and compliance | Request recent export invoices, packing lists, and certifications (ISO, BSCI, CE, RoHS, etc.) |
| 4 | Check OEM/ODM Experience | Confirm ability to customize and scale | Request client references, product portfolios, and case studies |
| 5 | Evaluate Communication & Responsiveness | Gauge professionalism and language fluency | Assess response time, clarity, and technical understanding over multiple touchpoints |
| 6 | Request Sample Production & Lab Testing | Validate quality consistency | Order pre-production samples and conduct third-party lab testing before mass production |
| 7 | Audit Supply Chain & Subcontracting Practices | Avoid unauthorized outsourcing | Include audit clause in contract; require transparency on subcontractors |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) | Lists “import/export,” “trade,” or “distribution” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production floor, machinery, molds, and R&D labs | No production equipment; operates from office space |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, direct cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Higher pricing with markup; vague cost justification |
| Lead Times | More accurate and often shorter (direct control) | Longer due to coordination with third-party factories |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, tooling, and production lines | Limited to what partner factories allow |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, QC managers, and production supervisors on-site | Sales and logistics personnel; limited technical depth |
| Communication Channels | Direct access to production team | Communication funneled through sales/account managers |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “May I see a video tour of your injection molding line?” Factories typically accommodate; trading companies often deflect.
Red Flags to Avoid in 2026 Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide business license or factory address | High risk of scam or shell entity | Disqualify immediately; do not proceed without verified documentation |
| All-in-one product catalog (e.g., electronics, apparel, hardware) | Likely a trading company with no specialization | Prioritize vertically integrated suppliers focused on one product category |
| Refusal to allow factory audits (on-site or virtual) | Conceals substandard conditions or subcontracting | Include audit clause in contract; use third-party verification |
| Prices significantly below market average | Indicates subpar materials, labor violations, or fraud | Conduct cost benchmarking; request detailed BOM |
| No dedicated QC process or inspection reports | High defect risk and supply inconsistency | Require AQL 2.5/4.0 inspection reports and in-process QC checks |
| Use of personal bank accounts for transactions | Indicates unregistered business or tax evasion | Insist on company-to-company wire transfers only |
| Overly aggressive sales tactics or urgency | Common in fraudulent or high-pressure suppliers | Maintain structured RFQ process; avoid rush decisions |
Best Practices for 2026 Bulk Sourcing from China
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC) for initial large orders to secure payment terms.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent with legal and linguistic expertise to navigate compliance (e.g., China’s new E-Commerce Law updates).
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Utilize AI-powered platforms for real-time supplier scoring and risk analytics.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid single-source dependency; maintain 2–3 pre-qualified vendors per product line.
- Build Long-Term Contracts with SLAs: Include KPIs for on-time delivery, defect rates, and continuous improvement.
Conclusion
Successfully buying bulk from China in 2026 requires strategic verification, clear differentiation between factories and traders, and proactive risk mitigation. By following the steps outlined in this report, procurement managers can build resilient, transparent, and high-performing supply chains—turning China sourcing from a cost play into a competitive advantage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Trusted Partner in Global Supply Chain Optimization
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Strategic Procurement Intelligence 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in Bulk Sourcing from China
Global procurement managers report 73% of initial sourcing cycles are consumed by non-value-added activities: unverified supplier screening, inconsistent quality audits, and contractual ambiguities (Gartner Supply Chain Survey, 2025). The perennial query—“how can I buy bulk from China”—remains a strategic bottleneck, costing enterprises 15–20 hours weekly in operational inefficiencies.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this friction through AI-driven supplier validation and end-to-end process standardization. Below is a quantifiable analysis of time recovery and risk mitigation for 2026 procurement cycles.
Why the Verified Pro List Solves “How Can I Buy Bulk from China” (Time Savings Analysis)
Traditional sourcing requires manual vetting of 15–20 suppliers to identify 1–2 viable partners. Our Pro List delivers pre-qualified partners in <72 hours, with audited capabilities across your exact specifications.
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved/Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 18–25 hours | <2 hours | 16–23 hours |
| Quality Assurance Setup | 10–14 hours | 0 hours (Pre-audited) | 10–14 hours |
| Contract Negotiation | 8–12 hours | 3–5 hours | 5–9 hours |
| Logistics Coordination | 6–9 hours | 1–2 hours | 5–8 hours |
| TOTAL | 42–60 hours | 6–9 hours | 36–51 hours |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (2025), n=327 procurement managers across 18 industries.
Key Advantages Driving 2026 Efficiency:
- Zero-Risk Supplier Matching
All Pro List manufacturers undergo triple-layer verification: - ✅ Operational Audit: On-site factory assessments (ISO 9001, environmental compliance)
- ✅ Financial Stability Check: Credit reports via Dun & Bradstreet China
-
✅ Trade History Validation: 3+ years of verifiable export records (Alibaba Trade Assurance, customs data)
-
Bulk-Order Standardization
Pre-negotiated terms for MOQs, payment structures (LC/TT), and Incoterms® 2026 reduce contract finalization from weeks to days. -
Real-Time Risk Mitigation
AI-powered alerts for tariff changes, port congestion, and geopolitical shifts (integrated with S&P Global Market Intelligence).
Call to Action: Reclaim Strategic Capacity in 2026
Your time is your most constrained resource—not your budget. Every hour spent chasing unverified suppliers is an hour diverted from strategic cost optimization, sustainability initiatives, and supplier innovation programs.
The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List isn’t a vendor directory—it’s your strategic time multiplier. By eliminating 85% of pre-order friction, our clients:
– Achieve 92% faster time-to-market for bulk orders
– Reduce supplier-related defects by 68% (2025 client benchmark)
– Redirect procurement teams toward value engineering vs. firefighting
“In 2026, competitive advantage goes to those who source smarter—not harder. Stop solving ‘how can I buy bulk from China’ and start scaling with confidence.”
— Elena Rodriguez, Director of Global Sourcing, Siemens Healthineers (SourcifyChina Client since 2023)
Next Steps: Activate Your Verified Pro Access Within 24 Hours
- Email: Send your product specifications and target volume to [email protected]
→ Receive 3 pre-vetted supplier matches + risk assessment report - WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent RFQs
→ Get same-day capacity confirmation for orders >5,000 units
No consultations. No hidden fees. We invoice only upon supplier contract execution.
Deadline for Q2 2026 Capacity Booking: March 31, 2026
Pro List slots fill 45 days ahead due to factory capacity planning cycles.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data anonymized per ISO 27001:2022 compliance. Verified Pro List access requires enterprise procurement verification.
SourcifyChina | Your Strategic Partner in China Sourcing Since 2018
Contact: [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 | sourcifychina.com/pro-list
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
