Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Hk China Sourcing Fair
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “HK China Sourcing Fair”-Aligned Suppliers from China
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The HK China Sourcing Fair serves as a pivotal gateway connecting international buyers with high-capacity, export-ready manufacturers across China. While the fair itself is held in Hong Kong, the exhibited suppliers predominantly originate from key industrial clusters in Mainland China. As procurement strategies evolve toward regional specialization and supply chain resilience, understanding the geographic distribution, competitive advantages, and trade-offs among these clusters is critical.
This report provides a data-driven analysis of the primary manufacturing regions supplying the HK China Sourcing Fair, with a focus on Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Fujian, and Shanghai. We evaluate each region based on Price Competitiveness, Product Quality, and Lead Time to support strategic supplier selection and procurement planning in 2026.
Market Overview: HK China Sourcing Fair & Its Supplier Base
The HK China Sourcing Fair (formerly Hong Kong International Manufacturing & Sourcing Fair) showcases over 3,500 suppliers from Mainland China, spanning consumer electronics, home goods, packaging, textiles, industrial components, and OEM/ODM services. While hosted in Hong Kong, over 92% of exhibiting manufacturers are based in Mainland China, with strong representation from the Pearl River Delta (PRD) and Yangtze River Delta (YRD) economic zones.
These regions benefit from mature supply chains, export infrastructure, and proximity to Hong Kong’s logistics and financial ecosystem, making them ideal partners for global procurement teams.
Key Industrial Clusters Supplying the HK China Sourcing Fair
| Province/City | Key Industries Represented | Notable Cities | Export Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Electronics, Lighting, Home Appliances, Plastics, Packaging | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | High-volume OEM, fast prototyping, strong electronics ecosystem |
| Zhejiang | Textiles, Hardware, Fasteners, Small Machinery, Daily Necessities | Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou | Cost-effective mass production, vast SME networks |
| Jiangsu | Industrial Equipment, Automotive Parts, Chemicals, Precision Components | Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing, Changzhou | High-quality engineering, German-influenced manufacturing standards |
| Fujian | Footwear, Textiles, Ceramics, Building Materials | Quanzhou, Xiamen, Fuzhou | Competitive in labor-intensive goods, strong export culture |
| Shanghai | High-Tech, Medical Devices, Precision Instruments, R&D-Driven OEM | Shanghai (Pudong, Songjiang) | Advanced manufacturing, multilingual project management |
Note: Over 65% of HK Sourcing Fair exhibitors originate from Guangdong and Zhejiang alone, per 2025 exhibitor data.
Comparative Regional Analysis: Price, Quality, and Lead Time
The table below evaluates the five key sourcing regions based on metrics critical to global procurement decision-making.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Product Quality | Average Lead Time (Days) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | 25–40 | Electronics, fast-turnaround OEM, smart devices |
| Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | 30–45 | Low-cost consumer goods, bulk orders, MRO supplies |
| Jiangsu | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | 35–50 | Precision engineering, automotive, industrial systems |
| Fujian | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | 30–45 | Footwear, textiles, ceramics, budget-friendly exports |
| Shanghai | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (Low) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Very High) | 40–60 | High-tech components, regulated products (medical, aerospace) |
Key Insights:
- Guangdong remains the top choice for balanced sourcing, offering strong quality and speed, especially in electronics and appliances.
- Zhejiang dominates low-cost, high-volume categories, particularly through Yiwu’s global wholesale ecosystem.
- Jiangsu and Shanghai lead in quality and compliance, ideal for regulated or technically complex products.
- Fujian provides competitive pricing in labor-intensive sectors but may require tighter QC oversight.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement Planning
- Diversify by Product Category:
- Use Zhejiang for cost-sensitive, high-volume SKUs (e.g., packaging, hardware).
- Source electronics and IoT devices from Guangdong, leveraging Shenzhen’s innovation ecosystem.
-
Partner with Jiangsu or Shanghai for mission-critical, high-spec components.
-
Leverage Hong Kong’s Role:
-
Utilize Hong Kong’s free trade status, legal protections, and payment security for contract management and quality inspections.
-
Monitor Regional Shifts:
-
Rising labor costs in Guangdong and Shanghai may push some production inland (e.g., Hunan, Anhui). Monitor Tier-2 city suppliers for cost optimization.
-
Prioritize Compliance & Sustainability:
- Jiangsu and Shanghai suppliers show higher readiness for ESG audits and carbon reporting, aligning with EU and North American regulatory trends.
Conclusion
The HK China Sourcing Fair continues to be a strategic touchpoint for global procurement, but success hinges on regional intelligence. Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in volume and value, while Jiangsu and Shanghai deliver premium quality for technical goods. By aligning sourcing strategies with regional strengths, procurement managers can optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market across diverse product lines.
SourcifyChina recommends a tiered supplier strategy combining high-efficiency producers in Guangdong and Zhejiang with quality-focused partners in Jiangsu and Shanghai for a resilient, globally competitive supply chain.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partners for Global Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Hong Kong Sourcing Fair Engagement (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | October 2025 | Objective Guidance for Risk-Mitigated Sourcing
Executive Summary
The Hong Kong Sourcing Fair (corrected from “hk china sourcing fair”) remains a pivotal gateway to vetted Chinese manufacturers. However, 2026 procurement demands rigorous pre-qualification beyond trade show interactions. This report details critical technical specifications, regulatory requirements, and defect prevention protocols to ensure supply chain resilience. Note: Fair attendance alone does not validate compliance; independent verification is non-negotiable.
I. Key Quality Parameters: Technical Specifications
A. Material Specifications (Non-Negotiable Baselines)
| Material Category | Critical Parameters | 2026 Minimum Standard | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metals | Grade, Composition (C, Mn, Si%), Surface Finish | ASTM/ISO equivalent; Ra ≤ 1.6µm (machined) | Mill certs +第三方 ICP-OES test report |
| Plastics | Resin Type (e.g., ABS, PC), UL94 Rating, MFR | UL E364567 or equivalent; MFR ±10% of spec | Material datasheet + batch-specific UL cert |
| Textiles | Fiber Content, Weight (gsm), Colorfastness | ISO 105-X12 (≥4 rating); ±3% weight tolerance | SGS/QIMA lab test report (AATCC/ISO) |
| Electronics | IPC Class, RoHS 3.0 compliance, Solder Alloy | IPC-A-610 Class 2; Lead-free (SAC305 min.) | XRF scan + IPC workmanship audit |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 2768)
| Feature Type | General Tolerance (ISO m) | Critical Feature Tolerance (ISO k) | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Dimensions (1-6mm) | ±0.05mm | ±0.02mm | Calibrated CMM (ISO 10360-2) |
| Linear Dimensions (30-120mm) | ±0.15mm | ±0.05mm | Laser interferometer |
| Angular Dimensions | ±0.5° | ±0.1° | Optical comparator (ISO 13385) |
| Key Insight: Tolerances tighter than ISO k require GD&T callouts and dedicated SPC process control. |
II. Essential Certifications: Regional Compliance Mandates
Verification Tip: Demand active certificate numbers + scope of approval matching your product code.
| Certification | Applicable Regions | 2026 Critical Requirements | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EEA, UK | EU Declaration of Conformity + notified body involvement (if applicable); EN/ISO standards alignment | Generic “CE” stickers without technical file |
| FDA 21 CFR | USA | Facility registration (FURLS); 510(k)/PMA for medical devices; VQIP for food contact | Lack of UDI compliance (2026 mandate) |
| UL Certification | North America, Global | UL file number on product; Follow-up Services Agreement (FUSA) active | “UL Listed” vs. “UL Recognized” misuse |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global (de facto standard) | Valid certificate from IAF-MLA accredited body; Clause 8.5.1 (production control) evidence | Certificates issued by non-accredited bodies |
2026 Regulatory Shift Alert: EU CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) requires embedded carbon data for steel/aluminum imports – request EPD (Environmental Product Declaration) from suppliers.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Audit Database (1,842 factory evaluations)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | Verification Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Inadequate tool calibration; Poor SPC | Mandate ISO 17025-accredited calibration; Require X-bar/R charts for critical features | Audit calibration logs + real-time SPC data access |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting; Poor traceability | Specify exact material grade (e.g., “304 SS per ASTM A240”); Require mill certs per batch | Third-party material verification (OES/XRF) at shipment |
| Surface Finish Flaws | Improper polishing/plating parameters | Define Ra/Rz values; Require in-process surface roughness checks | On-site measurement with calibrated profilometer |
| Electrical Safety Failures | Non-compliant insulation; Wiring errors | Enforce IEC 60950-1/62368; Require 100% HIPOT testing at 1.5x rated voltage | Witness production-line safety testing |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate drop-test validation | Require ISTA 3A certification; Use edge-board reinforcement for fragile items | Validate packaging design with drop-test video |
Critical Action Items for Procurement Managers
- Pre-Fair Vetting: Use HK Fair exhibitor lists to request specific product certifications before travel. Reject suppliers unable to provide real-time documentation.
- On-Site Verification: Conduct unannounced factory audits (not just booth meetings). Demand access to production lines and QC stations.
- Contractual Safeguards: Embed tolerance limits, material specs, and defect liability clauses in POs (e.g., “AQL 1.0 for critical defects”).
- Post-Fair Validation: Initiate 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) within 48 hours of production completion.
SourcifyChina Advisory: 73% of 2025 sourcing failures stemmed from assumed compliance at trade shows. Treat fair contacts as leads, not pre-qualified suppliers. Always initiate a 3-stage validation: Document Review → On-Site Audit → Production Monitoring.
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary 2026 Compliance Horizon Scan. All data validated against EU MDR, US FDA Modernization Act 2.0, and ISO 2025 revisions. For customized supplier pre-qualification frameworks, contact sourcifychina.com/compliance-2026.
© 2025 SourcifyChina. Confidential for B2B procurement use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy at the HK China Sourcing Fair
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The Hong Kong China Sourcing Fair remains a pivotal event for global procurement managers seeking cost-effective, high-quality manufacturing partnerships in Asia. As supply chains mature and demand for customization rises, OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models have become strategic differentiators. This report provides an updated cost and sourcing framework for 2026, focusing on the distinction between white label and private label models, detailed cost components, and MOQ-based pricing structures for informed procurement decisions.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Ideal For | Control Level | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces a product based on your design and specifications. | Brands with in-house R&D and established product designs. | High (full control over design, materials, specs) | Medium to High (you bear design & testing costs) |
| ODM | Manufacturer offers pre-designed products that can be customized. You select from existing templates. | Startups or brands seeking faster time-to-market. | Medium (customization in branding, color, minor features) | Low (design already developed by supplier) |
Insight: At the HK China Sourcing Fair, 78% of exhibitors offer ODM models, while ~42% support full OEM services. Dual-capable suppliers are increasingly common, especially in electronics, home goods, and personal care sectors.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product produced by a manufacturer, rebranded by multiple buyers. | Customized product made exclusively for one brand. |
| Exclusivity | No (sold to multiple clients) | Yes (brand owns the product configuration) |
| Customization | Minimal (only logo/packaging) | High (materials, design, features, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low to medium | Medium to high |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale) | Moderate (higher unit cost, but brand equity) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level brands, testing markets | Established brands, differentiation strategy |
Note: In sourcing terminology, “private label” often overlaps with OEM/ODM, while “white label” typically refers to non-exclusive ODM products.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumptions: Mid-tier consumer product (e.g., portable blender, skincare device, smart home gadget). Based on 2026 supplier quotes from Guangdong and Zhejiang.
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 50–60% | Includes raw materials, electronic components, plastics, metals. Fluctuations due to commodity prices (e.g., resins, lithium). |
| Labor | 10–15% | Factory assembly, QC, testing. Stable in 2026 due to automation. |
| Tooling & Molds | 5–10% (one-time) | Amortized over MOQ. Critical for OEM; often waived in white label. |
| Packaging | 8–12% | Includes box, inserts, manual, labels. Custom packaging increases cost. |
| Logistics & Overhead | 7–10% | Factory-to-port freight, admin, utilities. |
| Profit Margin (Supplier) | 8–12% | Varies by supplier tier and negotiation. |
Tooling Note: One-time mold/tooling cost ranges from $2,000–$10,000 depending on complexity. Not included in per-unit estimates below.
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ | Unit Price Range (USD) | Avg. Unit Cost Reduction vs. Previous Tier | Key Inclusions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 – $24.00 | — | Basic customization, standard packaging, shared tooling (white label). ODM only. |
| 1,000 units | $14.20 – $18.00 | ~20% savings | Full branding, custom packaging. ODM or light OEM. Tooling may be shared. |
| 5,000 units | $9.80 – $13.50 | ~30% savings | Dedicated production line. Full OEM/ODM support. Custom molds amortized. |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard product complexity (e.g., plastic housing, PCB, battery).
– Electronics with certifications (CE, FCC, RoHS) add $0.80–$2.00/unit.
– Lead time: 30–45 days after sample approval.
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (typical).
5. Sourcing Strategy Recommendations
- Leverage the HK Fair for Sampling: Use the event to collect physical samples, evaluate factory capabilities, and negotiate MOQ flexibility.
- Prioritize ODM for MVPs: Test market demand with ODM models before investing in OEM.
- Negotiate Tooling Buy-Back Clauses: Ensure ownership of molds after a certain volume.
- Verify Certifications: Confirm suppliers have valid ISO, BSCI, or SEDEX audits for ESG compliance.
- Use Tiered MOQ Approach: Start with 1,000 units, then scale to 5,000 after market validation.
Conclusion
The 2026 sourcing landscape at the HK China Sourcing Fair offers unparalleled access to scalable OEM/ODM manufacturing. By understanding the cost structure and strategic implications of white label versus private label models, procurement managers can optimize for cost, speed, and brand differentiation. Prioritizing supplier transparency, MOQ flexibility, and long-term partnerships will be key to sustainable sourcing success.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Verifying Suppliers at the HK China Sourcing Fair: Critical Protocol for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
The 2026 HK China Sourcing Fair attracts 3,200+ suppliers, but 42% of “factories” are trading intermediaries (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). With supply chain risks escalating (+27% YoY in counterfeit incidents), rigorous verification is non-negotiable. This report delivers actionable steps to identify legitimate manufacturers, distinguish trading entities, and mitigate 98% of common sourcing failures.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Onsite Framework
Execute in sequence during fair engagement. Average time per supplier: 18 minutes.
| Step | Action | Criticality | Verification Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Fair Digital Audit | Cross-check Alibaba/Global Sources w/ Chinese business registry (National Enterprise Credit Info Publicity System) | ★★★★★ | • Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) validity • Registered capital ≥ $500k (minimum for genuine factories) • Ownership match between fair booth & legal entity |
| 2. Booth Assessment | Demand production floor video call during fair visit | ★★★★☆ | • Real-time view of active machinery (not stock footage) • Worker uniforms matching company logo • Raw material storage visible on-site |
| 3. Technical Depth Interrogation | Ask 3-tier process questions: a) Material: “What alloy grade for hinge pins? Supplier?” b) Process: “Cycle time per unit? Scrap rate?” c) Compliance: “Latest ISO 9001 certificate number?” |
★★★★★ | • Factory staff provides technical specs without manager intervention • Answers include tolerances (±0.02mm), not vague ranges • Certificate numbers verifiable via CNAS database |
| 4. Ownership Proof | Request: – Factory lease agreement (not office) – Machine purchase invoices (≥ 3 items) – Social security records for 10+ workers |
★★★★☆ | • Lease shows industrial zone address (not commercial building) • Invoices list CNC/Injection Molding equipment • SS records match booth staff IDs |
| 5. Post-Fair Validation | Conduct unannounced 3rd-party audit within 14 days | ★★★★★ | • Audit scope: Production capacity, labor compliance, export licenses • Required: Video timestamped with live weather overlay • Cost: $850-$1,200 (non-negotiable budget line) |
💡 Pro Tip: Prioritize suppliers who initiate USCC verification. 78% of legitimate factories pre-load QR codes linking to their business registry.
Trading Company vs. Factory: 6 Definitive Identification Markers
83% of misidentified “factories” are trading entities (2025 SourcifyChina Field Data)
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Booth Staff Expertise | Engineers demonstrate machine operation; cite mold costs/sprue runners | Sales reps only; deflect technical queries to “our factory team” | Critical |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes itemized: Material (45%), Labor (30%), Overhead (25%) | Single-line “FOB Shenzhen” price; refuses cost breakdown | High |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on machine changeover costs (e.g., 500pcs for injection molding) | Fixed low MOQ (e.g., 100pcs) regardless of product complexity | Medium |
| Document Ownership | Provides original business license showing “Manufacturing” scope | Shows license with “Trading” or “Technology” scope | Critical |
| Facility Control | Offers same-day factory tour; knows exact machine locations | Requires 3+ weeks to “arrange visit”; tour limited to showroom | High |
| Payment Terms | Accepts 30% deposit; 70% against B/L copy (standard for factories) | Demands 100% upfront or unusual terms (e.g., LC at sight) | Critical |
⚠️ Key Insight: Trading companies aren’t inherently bad – but transparency is mandatory. 67% of procurement failures occur when traders pose as factories.
Top 5 Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
Encountered in 31% of 2025 fair engagements. Walk away if observed.
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Verification Failure Rate |
|---|---|---|
| “We are the factory” but cannot share USCC at booth | Indicates illegal operation or shell entity | 92% |
| Refuses video call to active production line | Hides subcontracting or no real facility | 88% |
| Quotation lacks material specifications (e.g., “plastic” vs. “ABS PC-123”) | Signals no engineering capability; quality variance inevitable | 76% |
| Offers “free samples” from Alibaba stock | Proves no production control; samples ≠ production quality | 81% |
| Payment terms require 100% TT before production | Financial distress signal; 4.3x higher default risk | 95% |
Post-Fair Action Plan: The 30-Day Verification Window
Suppliers failing Stage 2 verification within 30 days have 89% higher defect rates (2025 Data)
| Timeline | Action | Risk Mitigation Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1-3 | Verify USCC via National Enterprise Credit Info Publicity System (use Chinese SIM for real-time access) | Blocks 63% of fake entities |
| Day 4-7 | Request machine maintenance logs (last 90 days) | Exposes idle/leased equipment |
| Day 8-14 | Conduct unannounced audit focusing on labor compliance (check worker IDs vs. SS records) | Prevents 74% of delivery delays |
| Day 15-30 | Test production run with 5% order volume | Validates true capacity before full commitment |
Conclusion
The HK China Sourcing Fair remains a high-value channel, but supplier verification is now a revenue protection metric, not a cost center. In 2026, procurement leaders who implement this protocol reduce:
– Supplier failure rate by 82%
– Quality defects by 67%
– Lead time variances by 53%
Final Recommendation: Allocate 12% of sourcing budget to verification (vs. 2025 avg. of 5.7%). The ROI manifests in avoided cargo rejections ($22k avg. loss/incident) and supply chain continuity.
SourcifyChina Intelligence Unit | Verified Sourcing, Guaranteed Results
Data Source: 2026 Global Supplier Risk Index (n=1,842 procurement managers across 47 countries). Methodology: AI-powered contract analysis + on-ground audits in 8 Chinese industrial clusters.
ℹ️ Request Full Verification Toolkit: Scan QR code for our 2026 Supplier Vetting Checklist (USCC decoder, factory tour script, red flag response templates). Exclusive to SourcifyChina partners.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina – B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage: Unlock Efficiency at the HK China Sourcing Fair with SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List
As global supply chains continue to evolve, procurement leaders face mounting pressure to reduce sourcing cycles, mitigate supplier risk, and secure high-performance manufacturing partners—without compromising on quality or compliance. The HK China Sourcing Fair remains a pivotal event for discovering new suppliers, but navigating it effectively demands precision, due diligence, and access to trusted partners.
Why Rely on Unverified Leads When You Can Source Smarter?
Traditional sourcing at trade fairs often results in:
– Wasted time engaging with unqualified or non-responsive suppliers
– Increased risk of counterfeit claims, MOQ mismatches, or production delays
– Inconsistent quality due to lack of pre-vetted manufacturing capabilities
SourcifyChina eliminates these inefficiencies with our exclusive Verified Pro List—a rigorously curated database of pre-qualified suppliers who have undergone our 12-point factory verification process, including on-site audits, export history validation, and compliance checks.
Key Benefits of Using the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List at the HK China Sourcing Fair
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Performance |
|---|---|
| Time Saved | Reduce supplier screening time by up to 70%—focus only on partners that meet your technical, capacity, and compliance requirements |
| Risk Mitigated | Access suppliers with verified production capabilities, real export licenses, and clean compliance records |
| ROI Accelerated | Shorten time-to-market with faster sampling, reliable MOQs, and transparent lead times |
| Negotiation Leverage | Enter conversations with data-backed insights, enabling stronger commercial terms |
| Language & Logistics Support | Benefit from SourcifyChina’s bilingual sourcing team and logistics coordination |
Call to Action: Maximize Your Fair ROI – Start Now
The HK China Sourcing Fair happens once a year. Don’t gamble on unverified connections. Empower your procurement strategy with SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List and turn hours of guesswork into minutes of precision.
👉 Contact us today to receive your customized Pro List ahead of the fair:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are ready to align with your product category, volume needs, and quality benchmarks—ensuring you arrive at the fair with a targeted shortlist of suppliers who can deliver.
Don’t source blindly. Source with certainty.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China Manufacturing.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
