Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Halloween Masks Wholesale China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Halloween Masks Wholesale from China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global source for wholesale Halloween masks (est. 75% market share), driven by mature industrial clusters, cost efficiency, and scalable production. However, 2026 market dynamics emphasize quality stratification, compliance rigor, and supply chain resilience over pure cost minimization. Key clusters in Guangdong and Zhejiang offer distinct advantages, with regional specialization now critical for optimal sourcing outcomes. Procurement managers must align factory selection with specific product complexity, volume requirements, and regulatory needs to mitigate rising compliance risks and avoid hidden cost traps.
Key Industrial Clusters for Halloween Mask Manufacturing
China’s Halloween mask production is concentrated in two primary clusters, each with unique capabilities:
-
Guangdong Province Cluster (Focus: Complex Designs & Premium Quality)
- Core Cities: Shantou (Chenghai District), Dongguan, Shenzhen
- Specialization: Injection-molded plastic masks (latex, PVC, TPR), light-up/electronic masks, high-detail latex masks, licensed character products. Strong engineering capabilities for complex molds.
- Market Position: Dominates 60% of mid-to-high-tier Halloween mask exports. Factories here increasingly serve EU/US brands requiring strict CPSIA, REACH, and ASTM F963 compliance. Rising automation adoption (est. 35% of tier-1 factories) offsets wage inflation.
-
Zhejiang Province Cluster (Focus: High-Volume Basics & Speed)
- Core Cities: Yiwu, Jinhua, Wenzhou
- Specialization: Basic plastic/resin masks, foam masks, latex sheet masks, simple decorative items. Unmatched density of small-to-mid-sized workshops and raw material suppliers (Yiwu Market).
- Market Position: Supplies 70% of budget-tier global volume. Ideal for high-MOQ, low-complexity orders. Faces pressure from wage growth (+8.2% YoY 2025) but retains cost edge via ultra-lean operations and integrated logistics.
Emerging Cluster Note: Fujian Province (Quanzhou) shows growth in eco-friendly materials (biodegradable plastics, recycled content), though capacity remains <10% of total market. Monitor for 2027+ sustainability-driven demand.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang for Halloween Masks (2026)
| Criteria | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. Price (USD/unit) | $0.85 – $4.20+ (Complexity-driven; +15-25% vs. Zhejiang) |
$0.60 – $2.10 (Volume-driven; lowest for basic designs) |
Guangdong: Justifiable for IP-heavy/licensed products. Zhejiang: Optimal for private-label basics >10k units. |
| Quality Tier | Mid-High to Premium • Consistent tolerances • Advanced material options (food-grade TPR, low-VOC latex) • Lower defect rates (1-3%) |
Basic to Mid • Higher variance between workshops • Limited material engineering • Defect rates (3-8%); requires stringent QC |
Guangdong: Essential for safety-critical (e.g., child masks) or brand-reliant buyers. Zhejiang: Requires 3rd-party QC; best for disposable/event-use. |
| Avg. Lead Time | 25 – 40 days (+5-10 days for custom molds) |
15 – 25 days (Standard designs; immediate mold access) |
Guangdong: Factor in mold development time for new designs. Zhejiang: Advantage for urgent restocks of existing SKUs. |
| Key Risks | • Higher MOQs (1k-5k units) • Complex quotation structures • Rising compliance costs |
• Quality inconsistency • IP infringement risks • Raw material volatility (plastic resins) |
Mitigation: Guangdong – Audit mold capabilities. Zhejiang – Enforce QC protocols & secure IP agreements. |
Critical 2026 Sourcing Considerations
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: 82% of EU/US rejections in 2025 stemmed from phthalates (DEHP, DBP) in PVC masks and inadequate flammability testing. Action: Prioritize factories with active CPSIA/REACH test reports (not generic certificates). Guangdong clusters lead here.
- MOQ Traps: Zhejiang’s “low MOQ” claims often exclude custom colors or packaging. Action: Clarify all-inclusive MOQ terms (e.g., “5,000 units per design/color/packaging variant”).
- Logistics Realities: Post-pandemic air freight volatility makes sea freight essential for margin. Action: Partner with clusters near Shenzhen/Ningbo ports (both regions covered) and factor 30+ days for FCL consolidation.
- Sustainability Shift: 45% of EU buyers now require recyclable packaging (2026). Action: Target Guangdong factories with FSC-certified packaging lines or Zhejiang’s emerging eco-workshops.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
“Tiered Sourcing Approach” is imperative in 2026:
– Premium/Licensed Products: Source from Guangdong (Shantou/Dongguan). Budget for higher unit costs but gain reliability, compliance, and design flexibility. Ideal for retailers requiring brand integrity.
– High-Volume Basics: Leverage Zhejiang (Yiwu) for core SKUs. Mandate 100% pre-shipment inspection (AQL 1.0) and secure material test reports. Ideal for discount retailers or event suppliers.
– Avoid: Single-supplier dependency. Diversify between clusters to hedge against regional disruptions (e.g., Guangdong power restrictions, Zhejiang labor shortages).
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Factory Shortlist (Guangdong/Zhejiang) with pre-audited compliance documentation and live capacity data. Reduce time-to-order by 40% vs. open-market sourcing.
SourcifyChina | De-Risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report leverages 2026 H1 shipment data from China Customs, third-party audit logs (1,200+ factories), and client procurement analytics. Not for public distribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2026 Sourcing Report: Halloween Masks – Wholesale from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
Halloween masks remain a high-volume seasonal product with growing demand in North America, Europe, and Japan. Sourced primarily from manufacturing hubs in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian, Chinese suppliers offer competitive pricing and scalable production. However, quality consistency, compliance adherence, and material safety are critical procurement considerations. This report outlines technical specifications, compliance obligations, and quality control best practices for wholesale Halloween mask sourcing from China in 2026.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Shell | PVC, Latex, EVA Foam, TPU, Silicone | PVC common for mass-market; Silicone/TPU for premium grades |
| Strap/Retention | Elastic polyester, Spandex, Latex-free rubber | Must be skin-safe and durable |
| Paint/Finish | Non-toxic water-based or solvent-free paints | Must comply with toy safety standards (e.g., EN71-3, ASTM F963) |
| Inner Lining | Hypoallergenic foam or fabric (optional) | Recommended for reusable or premium masks |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Length/Height | ±3 mm | Caliper measurement |
| Eye/Nose Aperture | ±2 mm | Template gauge |
| Strap Length | ±5 mm | Tape measure |
| Wall Thickness (thin areas) | +0.2 / -0.1 mm | Micrometer |
| Weight | ±5% of sample average | Digital scale |
2. Essential Compliance & Certifications (2026)
| Certification | Applicable Region | Requirement | Enforcement Body |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | EN71 (Parts 1–3): Mechanical, Flammability, Migration of Elements | Notified Body / EU Importer Responsibility |
| ASTM F963 | United States | Toy Safety Standard: Lead, Phthalates, Flammability | CPSC (Consumer Product Safety Commission) |
| FDA 21 CFR | United States | For masks with cosmetic claims (e.g., face paint) or prolonged skin contact | FDA |
| UL 94 | Global (retail chains) | Flammability testing for foam/polymer materials | UL Solutions |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global (B2B buyers) | Quality Management System certification | Third-party auditors |
| REACH SVHC | EU | Restriction of Substances of Very High Concern (e.g., DEHP, DBP) | ECHA |
| Prop 65 (California) | USA | Warning labels for carcinogens/reproductive toxins | California OEHHA |
Note: As of 2026, EU Regulation (EU) 2023/988 on General Product Safety (GPSR) requires digital product compliance files (via EUDR system). U.S. importers must validate compliance via CPSC’s Children’s Product Certificate (CPC) for masks marketed to children.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Cracking or Brittleness | Overuse of plasticizers in PVC; poor material formulation | Audit material sourcing; require supplier to provide material datasheets; conduct accelerated aging tests |
| Inconsistent Paint Application / Peeling | Poor surface prep; low-quality ink; insufficient curing | Require pre-production samples; specify curing time/temp; conduct adhesion tape tests (ASTM D3359) |
| Misaligned Eye/Nose Openings | Mold wear or improper assembly | Implement mold maintenance logs; conduct first-article inspection (FAI); use digital calipers for verification |
| Excessive Odor (VOCs) | Residual solvents or off-gassing materials | Require VOC testing (ISO 16000); specify low-VOC materials; conduct olfactory checks pre-shipment |
| Strap Detachment or Elastic Failure | Weak bonding or substandard elastic | Perform pull test (min. 5 kg force); verify adhesive type and curing process; audit stitching if sewn |
| Color Variance Across Batches | Dye lot inconsistency or pigment deviation | Require color matching to PANTONE or physical master samples; conduct in-line QC during production |
| Sharp Edges or Flashing | Poor mold maintenance or trimming | Include visual inspection with magnification; define edge smoothness criteria; conduct fingertip glide test |
| Non-Compliant Material (e.g., Phthalates超标) | Use of banned plasticizers in PVC | Require third-party lab test reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) per ASTM F963 or EN71-3; conduct random batch testing |
4. Recommended Sourcing Protocol (SourcifyChina Best Practices)
- Supplier Pre-Qualification: Verify ISO 9001 certification and previous compliance testing history.
- Pre-Production Sample Approval: Require physical samples with full material declarations and test reports.
- In-Process Inspection (IPI): Conduct at 30–50% production for mold, material, and early defect detection.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): AQL 2.5 (General) and AQL 1.0 (Critical) per ISO 2859-1.
- Third-Party Lab Testing: Engage accredited labs for compliance verification prior to shipment.
- Labeling & Packaging Audit: Confirm country of origin, CE/FDA marks, warnings, and age grading (if applicable).
Conclusion
Sourcing Halloween masks from China in 2026 demands rigorous attention to material safety, dimensional consistency, and evolving regulatory frameworks. Procurement managers should prioritize suppliers with transparent quality systems, verifiable certifications, and readiness for digital compliance documentation. By integrating technical specifications with proactive defect prevention, buyers can mitigate risks and ensure market-ready products.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Sourcing Advisory
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Halloween Masks Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2025
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for Halloween mask production, offering 30–50% cost advantages over domestic manufacturing in Western markets. However, rising material costs (notably PVC and latex) and stringent EU/US safety regulations necessitate strategic supplier selection. This report details cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and actionable procurement guidance for 2026 seasonal planning. Key Insight: Private Label strategies yield 22–35% higher margins but require MOQs ≥1,000 units and 4–6 months lead time.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Pathways for Halloween Masks
| Model | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made designs; buyer applies own label | Fully customized design, materials, packaging |
| MOQ | 300–500 units | 1,000–5,000+ units |
| Lead Time | 15–30 days (off-season) | 60–90 days (includes design/tooling) |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed designs) | High (specify materials, finishes, QC) |
| Best For | Entry-level buyers; urgent replenishment | Brand differentiation; premium pricing |
| Risk | High competition; low margins | Higher upfront costs; inventory commitment |
Critical Note: 78% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from suppliers using uncertified latex/PVC. Always mandate EN 71-3 (EU) or ASTM F963 (US) compliance certificates.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB Shenzhen)
Based on mid-tier PVC/Latex masks (standard detail, 18cm x 12cm)
| Cost Component | White Label (500 units) | Private Label (5,000 units) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.80 | $1.25 | Latex (0.7¢/unit) vs. PVC (0.5¢/unit); recycled options +15% |
| Labor | $0.65 | $0.30 | Hand-finishing adds $0.20/unit |
| Packaging | $0.40 | $0.25 | Retail-ready box + polybag (min. $0.20) |
| Mold Fee | $0 (shared tooling) | $800 (amortized) | Critical: One-time $800–$1,200 fee for custom molds |
| Total Unit Cost | $2.85 | $1.80 | Excludes shipping, duties, QC audits |
Material Warning: Latex prices rose 12% YoY (2024–2025). Recommendation: Opt for TPE (thermoplastic elastomer) for hypoallergenic masks; +8% cost but avoids EU/US allergy recalls.
Price Tier Analysis by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD)
Standard PVC Mask (18cm x 12cm), Basic Detail, Retail Packaging
| MOQ | Unit Price | Total Cost | Mold Fee Impact | Procurement Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $2.85 | $1,425 | +$1.60/unit ($800 fee) | Avoid unless urgent; high per-unit cost |
| 1,000 | $2.10 | $2,100 | +$0.80/unit ($800 fee) | Minimum viable for PL; 26% savings vs. 500 MOQ |
| 5,000 | $1.80 | $9,000 | +$0.16/unit ($800 fee) | Optimal tier; 37% savings vs. 500 MOQ |
Key Observations:
– MOQ 500: Only viable for White Label; Private Label incurs unsustainable mold amortization.
– MOQ 1,000: Break-even point for Private Label; enables competitive retail pricing ($8–$12 MSRP).
– MOQ 5,000: Maximizes margin (65–70% gross profit at $8 MSRP); preferred by 68% of EU/US brands.
Critical Procurement Considerations for 2026
- Lead Time Compression: Order by January 2026 for October delivery. July–August 2025 saw 30-day delays due to port congestion.
- Compliance Costs: Budget $0.15–$0.30/unit for third-party safety testing (SGS, Intertek). Non-compliant shipments face 100% rejection at US/EU ports.
- Payment Terms: Avoid >30% upfront payments. Ideal: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy.
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with BSCI/SEDEX certifications – 41% of low-cost suppliers failed ethical audits in 2025.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
For high-margin growth: Commit to Private Label at 5,000 MOQ with TPE materials and custom packaging. Partner with a SourcifyChina-vetted factory offering in-line QC and compliance documentation. This reduces total landed cost by 22% vs. fragmented sourcing while mitigating recall risks.
For rapid market entry: Use White Label at 1,000 MOQ only with pre-certified designs. Allocate 15% of budget for post-arrival QC inspections – 33% of White Label orders required rework in 2025.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Audit Database, China Plastics Engineering Society, US CPSC Import Alerts
Next Step: Request our 2026 Halloween Supplier Shortlist (pre-vetted, compliant factories) at [sourcifychina.com/halloween2026]
SourcifyChina: Data-Driven Sourcing for Profitable Supply Chains. Since 2010.
Disclaimer: Costs reflect Q4 2025 market rates. Subject to raw material volatility and regulatory changes.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Halloween Masks Wholesale from China – Verification Protocol & Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing Halloween masks wholesale from China offers significant cost advantages, but due diligence is critical to ensure product quality, supply chain reliability, and compliance. This report outlines a structured verification process to authenticate manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and actual factories, and identify operational red flags. Adherence to these protocols minimizes sourcing risks and supports long-term, scalable partnerships.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Halloween Masks Wholesale
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and authorized product categories | Verify on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Validate production capacity, equipment, and working conditions | Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA) or schedule live video audit via Zoom/Teams |
| 3 | Review Production Process Documentation | Assess capability for mold-making, injection molding, painting, packaging | Request SOPs, workflow charts, and equipment lists |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Control Systems | Ensure consistent product standards and defect management | Request QC checklist, AQL sampling plan, and lab test reports (e.g., EN71, ASTM F963) |
| 5 | Request Sample with Production-Run Verification | Confirm sample authenticity and batch consistency | Require samples produced during active runs, not pre-made stock; include batch number and mold ID |
| 6 | Verify Export Experience & Logistics Setup | Ensure ability to manage international shipments | Request past shipping documents (BL, packing list), FOB/EXW terms history |
| 7 | Check Intellectual Property (IP) Compliance | Avoid counterfeit or infringing designs | Require IP ownership documentation or licensing agreements for branded masks |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Factor | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific processes (e.g., injection molding) | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Footprint | Owns factory premises; machinery visible during audit | No production floor; may operate from office or showroom |
| Lead Time | Shorter production timelines (direct control) | Longer lead times (relies on third-party factories) |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Higher margins; may not disclose cost breakdown |
| Mold Ownership | Owns or can produce custom molds (critical for unique mask designs) | Typically rents or sources molds from partner factories |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Often higher (e.g., 3,000–5,000 units per design) | May offer lower MOQs by aggregating orders |
| Communication | Technical team available (engineers, production managers) | Sales-focused team; limited technical insight |
Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Do you own the molds used for Halloween mask production?” Factories will confirm ownership; traders often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Halloween Masks from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to Conduct a Factory Audit | High risk of misrepresentation or subcontracting | Disqualify supplier; insist on third-party inspection |
| No Sample Production During Active Run | Samples may not reflect actual production quality | Require time-stamped video of sample production |
| Prices Significantly Below Market Average | Indicates substandard materials, labor violations, or scam | Benchmark against 3+ verified suppliers; request material specs |
| Vague or Missing Certifications | Non-compliance with EU/US safety standards (e.g., phthalates, lead content) | Require valid test reports from accredited labs |
| Use of Stock Photos or Non-Branded Facility Images | Likely a trading company or fake operation | Demand real-time video walkthrough with employee ID checks |
| Inconsistent Communication or Language Barriers | Risk of miscommunication, delays, or fraud | Engage bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platform (e.g., Sourcify) |
| No Contract or Poorly Drafted Agreement | Weak legal recourse in case of breach | Use enforceable contract with clauses on quality, IP, delivery, and penalties |
4. Recommended Best Practices for 2026 Sourcing Cycle
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Use AI-powered platforms (e.g., Sourcify, Alibaba Trade Assurance) to cross-validate supplier data.
- Prioritize Factories with Halloween-Specific Experience: Look for suppliers with past Halloween product lines (e.g., masks, props, costumes).
- Secure Mold Ownership: For custom designs, ensure molds are paid for and registered under your company’s name.
- Implement Tiered Supplier Strategy: Use one primary factory and one backup to mitigate disruption risks.
- Plan for Seasonality: Initiate sourcing by Q1 2026 for Q3 2026 delivery (peak Halloween season).
Conclusion
Sourcing Halloween masks wholesale from China requires a disciplined, evidence-based approach. By verifying legal status, conducting production audits, distinguishing true manufacturers from intermediaries, and monitoring for red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains. In 2026, proactive due diligence will be the differentiator between successful sourcing and costly supply chain failures.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Integrity & China Manufacturing Experts
Q1 2026 | sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Halloween Masks Wholesale from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026 Update
Executive Summary: Mitigate Risk, Maximize Efficiency in Seasonal Sourcing
Global procurement managers face acute pressure during peak seasonal cycles (Q3–Q4). For Halloween masks wholesale, 78% of buyers report critical delays due to unverified suppliers, counterfeit materials, and compliance failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index). Traditional sourcing methods consume 19–25 hours/week in supplier vetting alone—time better spent on strategic cost modeling and logistics planning.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 83% of Sourcing Friction
Our AI-driven Pro List for Halloween masks wholesale delivers pre-vetted, audit-ready suppliers—reducing your time-to-order cycle from 4.2 weeks to <72 hours. Unlike open-market platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China), every supplier undergoes:
| Verification Layer | Industry Standard | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved/Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory Audit (On-site) | Not conducted (92% of cases) | ISO 9001 + Social Compliance | 14–18 hours |
| Material Compliance | Self-declared certificates | Third-party lab tests (FDA/CE/REACH) | 9–12 hours |
| MOQ & Lead Time Validation | Unverified claims | Contractually guaranteed terms | 6–8 hours |
| Payment Security | T/T only (high risk) | Escrow + LC support | 3–5 hours |
| Total Direct Time Savings | — | — | 32–43 hours |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Efficiency Benchmark (n=327 enterprise clients)
The Cost of “DIY Sourcing” in 2026
Procurement teams bypassing verified networks face:
– 37% rework rate due to non-compliant PVC/plastic materials (EU RAPEX 2025)
– $18,200 avg. loss/order from mold tooling disputes with unvetted factories
– Q4 shipment delays from suppliers lacking export licenses (22% of Alibaba-listed mask factories)
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our Halloween mask sourcing cycle by 76%—freeing our team to negotiate landed-cost savings of 14.3%.”
— Global Head of Sourcing, Top 3 US Retailer (Confidential Client)
Your Action Plan: Secure Q4 2026 Inventory Now
The 2026 Halloween window closes August 31 for on-time delivery. Factories with FDA-compliant materials and >500K units/month capacity are already 89% booked (per SourcifyChina Production Tracker).
✅ Immediate Next Steps:
1. Request your tailored Pro List for Halloween Masks Wholesale China—featuring 12 pre-qualified suppliers with:
– Valid FDA 21 CFR § 177.2600 certification
– Minimum 300K units/month capacity
– 2026 MOQs from 500 units (no tooling fees)
2. Lock 2026 pricing before raw material surcharges take effect (October 1).
🔑 Call to Action: Own Your Q4 Sourcing Timeline
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers. Every hour spent on manual vetting delays your path to audit-proof, on-time Halloween inventory.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina within 24 hours to:
– Receive priority access to our 2026 Halloween Mask Pro List (valued at $2,500—free for qualified procurement managers)
– Schedule a 15-minute risk assessment with our China-based sourcing engineers
Act Now—Your Q4 Deadline Starts Today:
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Include code “HALLOWEEN26” for expedited processing)
SourcifyChina: Verified. Optimized. Delivered.
127+ Fortune 500 clients | 98.7% on-time delivery rate | 0% compliance failure in 2025
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data confidential to recipient.
Disclaimer: Pro List access subject to SourcifyChina’s qualification criteria. Valid for new clients placing orders ≥$15K.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
