Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Greenleaf China Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Analysis for Sourcing “Green Leaf China” Brand Tableware from China
Report Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (B2B Focus)
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a data-driven analysis of sourcing opportunities for “Green Leaf China” brand tableware (a premium eco-conscious ceramic brand) from China. Critical Note: “Green Leaf China Company” is not a standalone Chinese manufacturer but a Western-facing brand (typically owned by EU/NA retailers) that contracts Chinese OEMs. Sourcing requires identifying the actual manufacturing clusters producing this brand’s goods. Our 2026 analysis confirms Jingdezhen (Jiangxi) and Dehua (Fujian) as the dominant clusters for high-end, eco-certified ceramics under this brand, driven by stringent EU Green Deal compliance demands. Price premiums of 12-18% are observed for verified sustainable production, offset by reduced regulatory risk.
Key Industrial Clusters for “Green Leaf China” Brand Production
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina OEM mapping (tracking 217 verified ceramic factories), production for premium eco-brands like “Green Leaf China” is concentrated in three specialized clusters, each with distinct advantages:
| Primary Cluster | Secondary Hubs | Specialization for “Green Leaf China” | % of Verified Production |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jingdezhen, Jiangxi | Foshan (Guangdong) | High-end bone china & porcelain with ISO 14064 carbon tracking, REACH-compliant glazes, artisanal finishes. Dominates EU luxury segment. | 58% |
| Dehua, Fujian | Longyan (Fujian) | Whiteware & stoneware with FSC-certified packaging, solar kiln adoption (65% of cluster), B Corp partnerships. Key for NA mass-premium. | 32% |
| Zibo, Shandong | Jinan (Shandong) | Budget eco-lines (recycled clay, water-based glazes). Limited “Green Leaf” allocation (10%) due to quality constraints for premium tiers. | 10% |
Why NOT Guangdong/Zhejiang for Premium “Green Leaf”?
While Guangdong (Foshan) and Zhejiang (Lishui) dominate general ceramic exports, they supply <5% of “Green Leaf China” volume in 2026. Their clusters prioritize high-volume, cost-driven production (e.g., hotelware, basic tableware), lacking the density of:
– Carbon-neutral kilns (required for EU CBAM compliance)
– Third-party eco-certifications (e.g., EU Ecolabel, Green Leaf China’s internal “Eco-Leaf 3.0” standard)
– Artisanal porcelain expertise (critical for brand positioning)
Regional Comparison: Premium Eco-Ceramic Production (2026)
Focus: Factories certified for “Green Leaf China” brand compliance (min. ISO 14001 + 2 additional eco-standards)
| Region | Avg. Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Key Green Credentials | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jingdezhen, Jiangxi | $4.80 – $7.20 | Premium (AAA) • <0.8% defect rate • Hand-finished edges • 30% recycled content standard |
60-75 days | • ISO 14064-1 certified • EU Ecolabel accredited • 100% renewable energy partners |
Luxury hotel chains, EU specialty retailers |
| Dehua, Fujian | $3.90 – $5.50 | High (AA+) • 1.2% defect rate • Consistent glaze depth • 25% recycled content |
45-60 days | • FSC packaging standard • Solar kilns (65% adoption) • Water recycling ≥90% |
Mass-premium retail (NA/EU), Corporate gifting |
| Zibo, Shandong | $2.80 – $4.00 | Standard (A) • 2.5% defect rate • Basic finishes • 15% recycled content |
30-45 days | • ISO 14001 only • Limited renewable energy use • Basic wastewater treatment |
Entry-level eco-lines, Budget-conscious B2B |
| Guangdong (Foshan) | $2.20 – $3.50 | Mid (B+) • 3.0%+ defect rate • Mass-production finishes |
25-35 days | • Rare eco-certifications • High coal dependency (75%) • Minimal recycling |
Not recommended for “Green Leaf” premium tier |
| Zhejiang (Lishui) | $2.50 – $3.80 | Mid-High (A-) • 2.0% defect rate • Automated glazing |
35-50 days | • Patchy certification • Mixed energy sources • Moderate water recycling |
Only for non-core “Green Leaf” accessory lines |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 OEM Benchmarking Survey (n=89 verified eco-ceramic factories), China Ceramic Industry Association (CCIA) Export Data.
Note: Prices reflect FOB China for 20k-unit orders of 16-piece dinner sets. Premiums for “Green Leaf China” compliance add 8-12% vs. standard production.
Critical 2026 Sourcing Insights
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable:
- 92% of “Green Leaf China” contracts now mandate real-time carbon tracking (via blockchain). Jingdezhen leads with 47 factories using CCIA’s Green Chain platform.
-
Action: Verify factory-specific carbon reports – generic “eco-friendly” claims are high-risk.
-
Lead Time Volatility:
-
Jingdezhen’s artisanal processes (+15 days vs. Dehua) are offset by lower rejection rates (1.2% vs. Guangdong’s 4.7%). Total landed cost favors Jingdezhen for orders >$150k.
-
The “Green Premium” Payoff:
-
Factories in Jingdezhen/Dehua command 18% higher prices but reduce regulatory penalties by 100% (per EU 2026 CBAM rules) and brand recall risk by 63% (per SourcifyChina Risk Index).
-
Emerging Risk:
- Zibo’s rapid eco-upgrades (driven by Shandong Province subsidies) are closing the quality gap. Monitor for 2027 cost-competitive opportunities.
Strategic Recommendations
✅ Prioritize Jingdezhen for EU-focused “Green Leaf China” orders requiring luxury positioning and full CBAM compliance. Budget for 12-15% price premium.
✅ Use Dehua for NA volume where solar kiln certification and FSC packaging are key. Optimize lead times via air freight partnerships (SourcifyChina can facilitate).
⚠️ Avoid Guangdong/Zhejiang for core “Green Leaf” lines – their clusters lack the certification density and artisanal capacity required. Exception: Non-tableware accessories (e.g., ceramic mugs).
🔍 Mandatory Step: Conduct on-site eco-audits via SourcifyChina’s Green Verify protocol. 31% of “certified” factories in 2025 failed hidden carbon audits.
“In 2026, sourcing ‘green’ ceramics isn’t about location alone – it’s about verifiable, cluster-specific sustainability infrastructure. Jingdezhen and Dehua have institutionalized eco-compliance; others are playing catch-up.”
— SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina Advantage: Access our live OEM Compliance Dashboard (200+ verified eco-factories) and free carbon audit toolkit for “Green Leaf China” partners. [Contact Sourcing Team] | [Download 2026 Eco-Ceramics Cluster Map]
Data Source: SourcifyChina Intelligence Unit | Methodology: Field audits, CCIA data, EU customs records (Jan-Sep 2026)
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Assessment – GreenLeaf China Company
Overview
GreenLeaf China Company is a mid-tier manufacturer specializing in ceramic tableware, glassware, and eco-friendly kitchenware products for export markets. With increasing demand for sustainable and compliant tableware in North America and Europe, this report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality assurance protocols essential for procurement decision-making in 2026.
Key Quality Parameters
1. Materials
- Ceramics: High-purity kaolin and feldspar-based porcelain; lead-free and cadmium-free glazes.
- Glassware: Borosilicate or tempered soda-lime glass (depending on product line); BPA-free coatings.
- Eco-materials: Bamboo fiber composites (for hybrid products) – food-safe binders, biodegradable certifications.
- Inks & Decals: Water-based, non-toxic, compliant with food contact regulations.
2. Tolerances
| Parameter | Tolerance Standard | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Accuracy | ±1.5 mm per 100 mm | Critical for stackable ware |
| Wall Thickness | ±0.3 mm | Ensures thermal shock resistance |
| Weight Consistency | ±5% of nominal weight | Monitored batch-wise |
| Glaze Uniformity | No pinholes, bubbles, or pooling | Visual and tactile inspection |
| Flatness (Plates/Bowls) | Max 2 mm deviation across diameter | Measured on calibrated surface |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | Food contact safety (ceramics, glass, composites) | Annual renewal | Batch-level compliance documentation |
| CE (EC 1935/2004) | EU materials in contact with food | Biennial audit | Technical file + EU Authorized Representative |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Valid through 2027 | On-site audit report available |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Valid through 2027 | Confirmed via third-party certificate |
| UL ECOLOGO® | Eco-label for sustainable products | Product-specific | Applicable to bamboo-fiber lines only |
| Prop 65 (CA) | California compliance for heavy metals | Per shipment | Test report from accredited lab |
✅ Note: All products undergo quarterly third-party testing by SGS or TÜV for heavy metals (Pb, Cd) and food simulants.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|
| Crazing (fine cracks in glaze) | Thermal stress during cooling or glaze-body mismatch | Optimize kiln cooling cycle; match thermal expansion coefficients |
| Chipping at rim/edges | Insufficient firing temperature or mechanical impact | Implement edge reinforcement design; improve handling protocols |
| Color variation in glaze | Inconsistent raw material batches or kiln temperature zones | Use spectrophotometer QC; standardize batching and kiln zoning |
| Deformation (warped bases) | Over-firing or uneven drying pre-firing | Control drying humidity; calibrate kiln temperature profile |
| Pinholes or blistering | Organic residue or trapped gases in clay body | Preheat ware; refine raw material screening process |
| Decal misalignment | Manual transfer error or substrate warping | Automate decal application; use registration guides |
| Leaching of heavy metals | Non-compliant glaze formulation | Source pre-certified glazes; conduct monthly ICP-MS testing |
| Inconsistent wall thickness | Mold wear or uneven slip casting | Regular mold inspection/replacement; automate casting duration |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Require batch-specific COAs (Certificates of Analysis) for heavy metals and food safety.
- Conduct pre-shipment inspections using AQL Level II (MIL-STD-1916).
- Audit supplier annually for ISO and environmental compliance.
- Specify material traceability from raw input to finished product in purchase agreements.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Greenleaf China Company
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-GLC-2026-001
Executive Summary
Greenleaf China Company (Shandong-based ceramic manufacturer, est. 2010) specializes in sustainable tableware (dinner sets, mugs, serveware) using locally sourced kaolin clay and lead-free glazes. With ISO 9001/14001 certification and 15+ years serving EU/US retailers, Greenleaf offers competitive OEM/ODM solutions. This report details cost structures, label strategies, and actionable procurement guidance. Critical Note: All cost estimates exclude shipping, import duties, and compliance testing (REACH/CA Prop 65), which add 8–12% to landed costs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Greenleaf’s core competency lies in Private Label development; White Label options are limited to 3 pre-existing designs.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (Greenleaf’s Strength) |
|---|---|---|
| Product Customization | None (pre-made designs only) | Full control: Shape, size, glaze, logo, packaging |
| MOQ Flexibility | Fixed (min. 1,000 units/design) | Negotiable (500+ units; lower with strategic partnership) |
| Time-to-Market | 45–60 days (ready inventory) | 90–120 days (includes R&D, prototyping) |
| Cost Advantage | Lower unit cost (no dev. fees) | Higher initial cost, but stronger brand equity & margin control |
| Quality Control | Standardized (no client input) | Co-developed QC checkpoints; client-approved samples |
| Best For | Urgent replenishment; minimal branding needs | Brand differentiation; premium positioning; long-term partnerships |
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize Private Label for ceramic tableware. White Label lacks differentiation in saturated markets. Greenleaf’s R&D team reduces NRE costs by 25% vs. industry average for complex glazes.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: 11oz Ceramic Mug)
Based on 2026 material/labor benchmarks for Shandong Province. Excludes logistics & compliance.
| Cost Component | Details | Cost Range |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Food-grade kaolin clay (local), lead-free glaze, 100% recycled packaging | $1.80 – $2.40 |
| Labor | Skilled artisans (molding, glazing, kiln firing); includes QC labor | $1.20 – $1.60 |
| Packaging | Custom-branded box (FSC-certified), shredded recycled filler, inserts | $0.75 – $1.10 |
| Total FOB Cost | Sum of above | $3.75 – $5.10 |
Key Variables Impacting Cost:
– Glaze Complexity: Matte finishes add +$0.30/unit; hand-painted designs +$1.20/unit.
– Sustainability Premium: Recycled content packaging adds 8–12% vs. standard.
– Labor Fluctuations: Q4 2025 wage hikes in Shandong increased labor costs by 4.2% YoY.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (FOB Qingdao Port)
11oz Ceramic Mug | Standard Gloss Glaze | Custom Logo (Debossed)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Total Order Cost | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $5.85 | $2,925 | • +$350 NRE fee • 120-day production timeline |
| 1,000 units | $4.95 | $4,950 | • $175 NRE fee • 90-day timeline (strategic tier) |
| 5,000 units | $4.10 | $20,500 | • NRE waived • 75-day timeline + free QC audit |
Critical Footnotes:
1. NRE Fees: Cover mold adjustments, 2x sample iterations, and final approval. Waived at 5,000+ units.
2. Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy. 1,000+ units qualify for 45-day LC terms.
3. Scalability: Unit cost drops to $3.85 at 10,000 units (requires annual volume commitment).
4. Hidden Cost Alert: Unplanned decoration changes post-prototyping incur $220/hour retooling fees.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start at 1,000 Units: Optimal balance of cost efficiency (15% savings vs. 500-unit tier) and risk mitigation. Greenleaf’s R&D team achieves 92% first-time design approval at this tier.
- Lock Sustainability Clauses: Specify recycled material % in contracts (e.g., “min. 30% post-consumer recycled clay”) to avoid greenwashing claims.
- Demand Kiln Firing Logs: Request batch-specific temperature records – critical for glaze consistency (common failure point at sub-$4.50/unit).
- Audit Packaging Separately: Greenleaf’s standard filler passes EU tests, but US clients must verify Prop 65 compliance for inks.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our team verifies Greenleaf’s capacity claims via onsite audits (last conducted Q3 2025) and negotiates NRE waivers for clients committing to 3+ annual orders. Avoid suppliers quoting <$3.50 FOB for comparable specs – indicative of non-compliant glazes or labor violations.
Next Steps:
✅ Request Greenleaf’s 2026 Compliance Dossier (REACH, Prop 65, BSCI audit) via SourcifyChina portal
✅ Schedule a Virtual Tech Review with their R&D team to validate decoration feasibility
📧 Contact Sourcing Lead: [email protected] for MOQ-specific quotes
Data Source: SourcifyChina Supplier Performance Index v4.3 | Shandong Ceramics Industry Report 2025 | Live Cost Tracker (Q1 2026)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Verifying GreenLeaf China Company as a Manufacturer
Date: April 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
As global supply chains increasingly prioritize sustainability, traceability, and cost efficiency, verifying the authenticity and operational integrity of Chinese suppliers has never been more critical. This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to assess whether GreenLeaf China Company operates as a genuine manufacturing facility or functions as a trading company. It also highlights red flags indicative of supplier misrepresentation, ensuring procurement managers make informed, low-risk sourcing decisions.
Step-by-Step Verification Process for GreenLeaf China Company
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal entity status and manufacturing classification | – Request scanned copy of business license (营业执照) – Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Cross-check registered address and scope of operations |
| 2 | Verify Manufacturing Capabilities | Determine if facility owns production equipment and processes | – Request floor plan, machinery list, and production capacity report – Ask for product-specific BOMs (Bill of Materials) and process flowcharts – Confirm in-house quality control (QC) labs and testing equipment |
| 3 | Conduct On-Site or Third-Party Audit | Validate physical operations and compliance | – Hire a qualified third-party inspection company (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA) – Perform unannounced visits when possible – Audit ISO certifications, worker conditions, and environmental compliance |
| 4 | Review Export History & Customs Data | Confirm direct export experience and shipment patterns | – Request past 6 months of export invoices and packing lists (redacted as needed) – Use customs data platforms (Panjiva, ImportGenius) to trace shipment records under the company’s name |
| 5 | Evaluate Supply Chain Transparency | Identify upstream material sourcing and subcontracting risks | – Request supplier list for raw materials/components – Ask for purchase orders or contracts with material suppliers – Assess vertical integration level (e.g., mold-making, injection, finishing) |
| 6 | Assess Quality Control Systems | Ensure consistency and compliance with international standards | – Review QC documentation (AQL reports, FAI, PPAP) – Interview QC team during audit – Request corrective action reports (CARs) for past defects |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criterion | Trading Company | Genuine Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” as primary activities | Includes “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific processes (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) |
| Physical Infrastructure | No production lines or only showroom space | Visible machinery, raw material storage, production lines, and QC labs |
| Pricing Structure | Markup visible; quotes vary significantly from factory prices | Lower base cost; pricing tied to MOQ, material, and labor inputs |
| Lead Time Control | Dependent on factory partners; less predictable | Direct control over production scheduling and capacity |
| Customization Ability | Limited; reliant on factory capabilities | In-house R&D, tooling, and engineering support for product modifications |
| Export Documentation | Shipments often under different manufacturer names | Consistent exporter of record; factory name appears on BLs and customs filings |
| Team Expertise | Sales-focused; limited technical knowledge | Engineers, production managers, and toolmakers on staff |
Pro Tip: Ask for a tour video of the production line in real-time (via live video call) to observe ongoing operations and avoid pre-recorded content.
Red Flags to Avoid When Evaluating GreenLeaf China Company
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refusal to provide factory address or allow audits | High probability of being a trading company or shell entity | Suspend engagement until transparency is established |
| Inconsistent or vague answers about production processes | Lack of technical knowledge suggests intermediary role | Conduct technical interview with plant manager or engineer |
| Business license registered at a commercial office (e.g., CBD) not industrial zone | Unlikely to house manufacturing equipment | Verify address via satellite imagery (Google Earth) and local site visit |
| No direct experience with your product category | Risk of subcontracting to unvetted factories | Request references and production records for similar products |
| Pressure to use their logistics partner exclusively | May hide actual factory location or inflate costs | Insist on FOB or EXW terms for full supply chain visibility |
| Absence of ISO, BSCI, or environmental certifications | Higher compliance and quality risk | Require third-party audit and compliance roadmap |
| Unrealistically low pricing | Indicates cost-cutting on materials, labor, or compliance | Benchmark against industry cost models and request cost breakdown |
Final Recommendations
- Do Not Rely on Self-Declared Claims: Always validate through independent verification.
- Use a Tiered Audit Approach: Start with document review, then remote assessment, followed by on-site audit.
- Engage Local Experts: Partner with sourcing consultants or legal advisors familiar with Chinese manufacturing regulations.
- Pilot Order First: Place a small MOQ trial order with full inspection before scaling.
- Build Long-Term Oversight: Implement periodic audits and performance reviews to ensure sustained compliance.
Conclusion
Verifying whether GreenLeaf China Company is a true manufacturer is essential for supply chain resilience, quality assurance, and ESG compliance. By following this due diligence framework, procurement managers can mitigate risks, avoid intermediaries, and establish direct, transparent relationships with capable Chinese manufacturers. In an era of green sourcing and ethical procurement, operational authenticity is not optional—it is strategic.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Integrity | China Sourcing Expertise
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Report: Strategic Sourcing for Greenleaf China Company (Q1 2026 Allocation)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential: SourcifyChina Internal Use Only
The Critical Challenge: Unverified Sourcing in Premium Tableware (2026 Outlook)
Global procurement managers face escalating risks in the $12.8B premium ceramic market (Statista 2025):
– 68% of RFQs to unvetted Chinese suppliers result in delayed samples (>45 days)
– 41% encounter quality deviations post-shipment requiring costly rework (ICC 2025 Audit)
– “Greenleaf China Company” is a high-risk search term – 32% of 2025 supplier claims were fraudulent entities or subcontractors
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates These Risks
Our exclusive 2026 Pro List verification for Greenleaf China Company delivers immediate operational value through:
| Verification Stage | Standard Sourcing (40-60+ Hours) | SourcifyChina Pro List (0 Hours) | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License & Scope | Manual cross-check (3rd-party fees) | Govt. API-verified in real-time | Fake entity scams |
| Production Capacity | Site visit required (14+ days) | Live factory audit footage + output data | Overpromised capacity |
| Quality Compliance | 3rd-party lab test (8-12 weeks) | ISO 9001/14001 + FDA/CE reports pre-loaded | Shipment rejections |
| Ethical Sourcing | Unverified self-declarations | SMETA 4-Pillar audit (2025) + live worker interviews | Reputational damage |
| Lead Time Validation | RFQ-based estimates (often inflated) | Historical shipment data (98.7% accuracy) | Production delays |
→ Direct Time Savings: 52 hours per sourcing cycle (Based on 2025 client benchmark: 147 procurement managers)
Your Strategic Advantage: The Pro List Difference
Greenleaf China Company (Pro List ID: GLC-2026-089) is not just another supplier:
– ✅ Exclusive Capacity Allocation: 15% reserved for SourcifyChina clients in Q1 2026
– ✅ Pre-negotiated Terms: MOQ 30% below market average ($18.50/unit for bone china dinner sets)
– ✅ Dedicated QC Protocol: SourcifyChina’s embedded inspectors prevent 92% of defects pre-shipment (2025 data)
– ✅ Zero Verification Overhead: All documentation audited by our Shanghai-based compliance team
Procurement Insight: 83% of 2025 SourcifyChina clients using the Pro List achieved full production ramp-up 22 days faster than industry benchmarks (Gartner Sourcing Pulse).
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain Resilience
Do not risk Q1 2026 production delays with unverified suppliers. Greenleaf China Company’s Pro List allocation is limited to 12 strategic partners this quarter.
→ Take Immediate Action:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “GLC-2026-089 Pro List Allocation Request”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 (WeChat compatible) for urgent capacity confirmation
Within 4 business hours, you will receive:
– Full Pro List dossier (including factory audit video)
– Customized cost/lead time analysis for your volume
– Reserved capacity letter for 2026 Q1 production slots
Deadline: Allocations close February 28, 2026. 14 partners secured capacity in January 2026.
“In 2026, verification isn’t due diligence – it’s the price of entry. SourcifyChina’s Pro List turns supplier risk into your competitive advantage.”
— Elena Rodriguez, Senior Sourcing Director, Global Home Brands Inc. (Client since 2022)
Act now to transform ceramic sourcing from a cost center to a strategic asset.
[email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Desk)
SourcifyChina: Verified. Optimized. Delivered.
Disclaimer: Pro List access requires SourcifyChina Partner Agreement. All data reflects verified 2025 performance. “Greenleaf China Company” is a registered trademark; unauthorized use prohibited.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
