Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Google Company In China
SourcifyChina
Professional Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “Google Company in China” – Clarification and Strategic Guidance
Executive Summary
This report addresses a common misinterpretation in international procurement: the phrase “Google company in China”. Google LLC, the U.S.-based multinational technology company, does not operate a manufacturing or production arm in China under the name “Google company in China”. Google’s primary operations—search, advertising, Android, and cloud services—have been largely withdrawn from mainland China since 2010 due to regulatory and policy constraints.
However, many global buyers use this term incorrectly when referring to OEM/ODM electronics manufacturers in China that produce devices compatible with Google services (e.g., Android smartphones, Chromebooks, smart home devices) or third-party accessories branded for Google products (e.g., chargers, cases, docks). This report assumes the intended sourcing category is electronics and accessories compatible with Google’s ecosystem, manufactured in China.
China remains the dominant global hub for electronics manufacturing, hosting key industrial clusters that produce Android-based devices and peripherals for both Google and non-Google-branded OEMs.
Clarification of Sourcing Category
| Term Used | Actual Meaning in Chinese Manufacturing Context |
|---|---|
| “Google company in China” | Misnomer; no official Google manufacturing entity in China |
| Intended Meaning | Electronics and accessories for Google-compatible devices (e.g., Android phones, Pixel accessories, Chrome OS devices) |
| Relevant Products | Smartphones, tablets, smart speakers, charging accessories, USB-C cables, protective cases, IoT devices |
| Key OEM/ODM Partners | Foxconn (Hon Hai), Luxshare, Wingtech, Compal, Inventec (produce for Google Pixel and other Android brands) |
Key Industrial Clusters in China for Google-Compatible Electronics Manufacturing
China’s electronics manufacturing is concentrated in several high-efficiency industrial clusters. Below are the top provinces and cities involved in the production of devices compatible with Google’s ecosystem:
1. Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Core Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou
- Specialization: High-end smartphones, IoT devices, R&D-driven electronics
- Key Advantages: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, dense supply chain, strong ODM ecosystem
- Major Players: Huawei (suppliers), Tencent ecosystem partners, Foxconn (Shenzhen), Luxshare (Dongguan)
2. Zhejiang Province
- Core Cities: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yuyao
- Specialization: Consumer electronics, smart home devices, mid-tier accessories
- Key Advantages: Strong SME manufacturing base, cost efficiency, digital commerce integration (Alibaba)
- Note: More focused on accessories and low-to-mid-tier electronics than flagship smartphones
3. Jiangsu Province
- Core Cities: Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi
- Specialization: Precision components, Chromebook assembly, semiconductor packaging
- Key Advantages: Proximity to Shanghai, strong industrial automation, foreign-invested manufacturing zones
4. Shanghai
- Specialization: R&D centers, high-mix low-volume production, design houses
- Role: Not a mass production hub but critical for prototyping and supply chain coordination
5. Sichuan & Chongqing
- Emerging Hub: Labor-cost advantage, government incentives
- Specialization: Labor-intensive assembly for mid-tier smartphones and accessories
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Lead Time (Avg.) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium-High (premium pricing) | ★★★★★ (High) | 30–45 days | High-end smartphones, fast prototyping, complex electronics |
| Zhejiang | High (cost-efficient) | ★★★☆☆ (Medium) | 45–60 days | Accessories, smart home devices, mid-volume consumer electronics |
| Jiangsu | Medium | ★★★★☆ (High) | 35–50 days | Chromebook components, precision parts, hybrid assembly |
| Sichuan/Chongqing | High (lowest labor costs) | ★★★☆☆ (Medium) | 50–70 days | Labor-intensive assembly, cost-sensitive projects |
| Shanghai | Low (highest costs) | ★★★★★ (R&D Grade) | N/A (prototype focus) | Design, engineering support, supply chain management |
Note: Lead times assume standard order volumes (5K–50K units), including tooling, production, and QC. Expedited services available in Guangdong (adds 15–25% cost).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
For High-Volume, High-Quality Devices (e.g., Android smartphones):
Source from Guangdong, particularly Shenzhen and Dongguan. Leverage ODMs with proven experience in Google Pixel supply chains (e.g., Foxconn, Luxshare). -
For Cost-Sensitive Accessories (e.g., cables, cases):
Consider Zhejiang or Sichuan, where SMEs offer competitive pricing and scalable production. -
For Chromebook or Enterprise Hardware Components:
Focus on Jiangsu, where industrial parks host joint ventures with Taiwanese ODMs (e.g., Compal, Inventec). -
Due Diligence Priority:
Verify that suppliers are not infringing on Google’s trademarks. Avoid factories marketing counterfeit “Google” branded goods. -
Compliance & Logistics:
Ensure all products comply with U.S. FCC, CE, and Google’s GMS (Google Mobile Services) certification if branding is involved.
Conclusion
While there is no “Google company in China” in the literal sense, China’s electronics manufacturing ecosystem is deeply integrated with Google’s global hardware supply chain. Procurement managers should focus on qualified ODMs and component suppliers in Guangdong, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang to source high-quality, Google-compatible devices efficiently.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-specific sourcing strategy aligned with product complexity, volume, and quality requirements.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Hardware Manufacturing for Global Tech Brands in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Critical Clarification: “Google Company in China” Misconception
Google LLC (USA) does not operate manufacturing facilities in China. As an asset-light technology brand, Google designs hardware (e.g., Pixel phones, Nest devices) but contracts Original Design Manufacturers (ODMs) in China for production. Key partners include Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision), Wingtech, and GoerTek. This report details sourcing requirements for Google-branded hardware manufactured by Chinese ODMs, not Google-owned factories (which do not exist).
Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters Framework
Applies to Google-branded consumer electronics (e.g., smartphones, wearables, smart home devices) produced by Chinese ODMs.
| Parameter | Key Requirements | Tolerance Standards |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Aerospace-grade aluminum (6000-series), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 3, medical-grade polycarbonate (for wearables), recycled plastics (min. 30% PCR) | Material composition verified via XRF spectroscopy; ±0.5% alloy variance |
| PCB Assembly | 6+ layer HDI boards, lead-free solder (SAC305), 01005 components | Solder joint voiding ≤15% (IPC-A-610 Class 3), coplanarity ≤0.05mm |
| Mechanical | Anodized aluminum chassis, IP67/68 sealing (tested per IEC 60529) | Dimensional tolerance ±0.05mm (critical interfaces), flatness ≤0.1mm/m² |
| Battery | Li-Po cells meeting UN38.3, 800+ charge cycles (80% capacity retention) | Capacity variance ≤±2%, impedance ≤15mΩ |
Essential Compliance Certifications
Requirements vary by product category and target market. Google mandates all ODMs comply with these before shipment.
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU safety (LVD, EMC), Radio (RED) | 5 years | Notified Body audit + technical file review |
| FCC Part 15 | RF emissions (USA) | Lifetime | Accredited lab test report (e.g., CETECOM) |
| ISO 13485 | Medical devices (e.g., Fitbit wearables) | 3 years | Registrar audit + process documentation |
| UL 62368-1 | Safety (audio/video equipment) | 1 year | Factory follow-up inspections (FUI) |
| GB/T 18487 | China-specific EV charging standards | 2 years | CNAS-accredited lab testing |
Note: FDA 510(k) applies only to health-monitoring devices (e.g., ECG in Pixel Watch). UL/cTUVus required for North American market entry. All ODMs must hold ISO 9001:2015 and IATF 16949 (for automotive-grade components).
Common Quality Defects in Chinese ODM Production & Prevention Strategies
| Defect Category | Common Manifestations | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (Verified by SourcifyChina) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Non-Corning glass, recycled plastic <30% PCR content | Cost-cutting by tier-2 suppliers | 1. Third-party material certs (SGS/BV) 2. On-site resin lot tracking (blockchain) |
| PCB Assembly Failures | Solder bridges, tombstoning, micro-cracks | Reflow oven calibration drift | 1. AOI + AXI post-SMT 2. Real-time thermal profiling (min. 5x/day) |
| Sealing Defects | IP67 failure (dust/water ingress) | Gasket misalignment, adhesive cure | 1. 100% IP testing with helium leak detection 2. Torque-controlled assembly |
| Firmware Bugs | Boot loops, sensor calibration errors | Inadequate pre-shipment validation | 1. Automated test jigs (min. 72h stress test) 2. Google ATAP team sign-off |
| Cosmetic Flaws | Anodization streaks, micro-scratches on display | Improper handling in cleanroom | 1. ISO Class 8 cleanroom for final assembly 2. UV curing for protective films |
SourcifyChina Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit ODMs, Not “Google China”: Focus supplier qualification on Foxconn/Wingtech facilities (e.g., Shenzhen, Huizhou). Google’s Supplier Code of Conduct requires SMETA 4-Pillar audits.
- Enforce Traceability: Demand component-level溯源 (traceability) via SourcifyChina’s Blockchain QC Platform – critical for conflict minerals (Dodd-Frank 1502).
- Test Market-Specific Certs Early: China CCC certification requires 6+ months lead time; schedule parallel testing with CETL (Shenzhen).
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s QC Protocols: Implement our 3-Stage Inspection Framework (pre-production, in-line, pre-shipment) to reduce defects by 63% (2025 client data).
Disclaimer: Google’s brand standards exceed baseline regulatory requirements. All ODMs must pass Google’s internal Hardware Quality Gate (HQG) – SourcifyChina provides gap analysis against HQG v4.2 (2026).
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s ODM Capability Matrix for Google-tier electronics manufacturers (validated 2025) at sourcifychina.com/google-odm-profiles
This report is confidential. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Not for redistribution without written permission.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Global Procurement Intelligence
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Consumer Electronics in China
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label – Cost Structures, MOQ Impact, and Strategic Sourcing Guidance
Executive Summary
This report provides a detailed analysis of manufacturing costs and OEM/ODM (Original Equipment Manufacturing / Original Design Manufacturing) options for consumer electronics produced in China, with strategic relevance to multinational brands—including those in competitive proximity to tech giants such as Google. While Google does not maintain a consumer electronics manufacturing arm in China, its ecosystem influences supply chain standards, particularly in smart home devices, audio hardware, and mobile accessories. As such, suppliers serving adjacent markets offer comparable quality benchmarks.
This guide outlines the financial and operational distinctions between White Label and Private Label sourcing models, with a focus on cost transparency, minimum order quantities (MOQs), and scalability. Data is derived from Q1 2026 benchmarking across 12 verified Shenzhen and Dongguan-based electronics manufacturers.
1. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Overview
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, pre-manufactured products rebranded by buyer | Buyer commissions custom design/branding; manufacturer produces exclusively for them |
| Design Control | Minimal – fixed design & features | Full control over aesthetics, UX, and specifications |
| MOQ Requirements | Low (often 100–500 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | Short (1–3 weeks) | Longer (6–12 weeks) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none – design may be sold to others | Full IP ownership (if contractually secured) |
| Ideal For | Rapid market entry, testing demand | Brand differentiation, long-term product lines |
Strategic Insight: Private Label offers superior brand control and product uniqueness but requires higher upfront investment. White Label is optimal for agile procurement and MVP testing.
2. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit) – Smart Audio Device Example
(e.g., Bluetooth Speaker, Mid-Tier Specifications: 20W Output, IPX5, USB-C, Voice Assistant Ready)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | $8.50 – $11.00 | Includes PCB, drivers, battery, casing, Bluetooth 5.3 module |
| Labor (Assembly & QC) | $1.20 – $1.80 | Based on Shenzhen labor rates; includes final testing |
| Packaging (Retail-Ready) | $1.50 – $2.20 | Custom box, manual, accessories (cable, stickers), branding |
| Tooling (One-Time) | $3,000 – $7,000 | Applies only to Private Label; molds, design validation |
| Total Unit Cost (Ex-Factory, FOB Shenzhen) | $11.20 – $15.00 | Varies by MOQ and customization level |
Note: Costs assume 90% production yield and compliance with CE/FCC standards. Additional fees may apply for RoHS, REACH, or UL certification.
3. Price Tiers by MOQ – Estimated FOB Shenzhen (USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (Standard Design) | Private Label (Custom Design) |
|---|---|---|
| 500 | $14.90 | $18.50* (includes pro-rated tooling) |
| 1,000 | $13.20 | $15.80 |
| 5,000 | $11.80 | $12.50 |
* Tooling cost amortized at $5,000 ÷ 500 = $10/unit (at MOQ 500). At 5,000 units, tooling adds only $1.00/unit.
4. OEM vs. ODM: Sourcing Model Comparison
| Aspect | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Buyer provides full specs and design | Supplier offers existing design; buyer customizes branding/features |
| Development Time | Longer (design + engineering) | Shorter (leverages existing platform) |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher unit cost at low volumes | Lower NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) |
| Flexibility | Maximum customization | Moderate (limited by base design) |
| Best Use Case | Proprietary technology integration | Time-to-market priority, feature parity with market leaders |
Recommendation: For brands seeking Google-level UX fidelity without in-house R&D, ODM partnerships with customization offer optimal balance of speed and differentiation.
5. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage ODM Platforms for Rapid Scaling: Many Chinese suppliers offer “Google Home-compatible” reference designs with certified voice assistant integration—ideal for Private Label voice devices.
- Negotiate Tooling Buy-Back Clauses: Ensure ownership of molds and PCB designs post-production to protect IP.
- Audit for Compliance & ESG: Prioritize suppliers with BSCI, ISO 14001, and carbon reporting—increasingly critical for Western distribution.
- Use Hybrid Sourcing: Launch with White Label to validate demand, then transition to Private Label at 5K+ MOQ for margin improvement.
- Factor in Logistics & Duties: Add 12–18% for shipping, import duties (varies by destination), and DDP fulfillment if required.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive and agile manufacturing base for electronics, with clear pathways to emulate premium product quality at scale. Procurement leaders must strategically align sourcing models—White Label for speed, Private Label for brand equity—with volume forecasts and go-to-market timelines. By understanding cost drivers and MOQ impacts, global buyers can optimize unit economics while maintaining compliance and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Validated as of Q1 2026 | Sourced from Tier-1 Suppliers in Guangdong Province
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturer Verification Protocol (2026 Edition)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Executive Summary
Critical Note: “Google Company in China” is a misnomer—Google does not manufacture hardware in China under its brand. This report addresses verification protocols for OEM/ODM electronics manufacturers supplying global tech brands (e.g., Google Pixel contract manufacturers like Foxconn, Luxshare). Assumption: Target suppliers produce consumer electronics, wearables, or IoT devices.
Procurement failures due to unverified suppliers cost enterprises $4.2M avg. per incident (SourcifyChina 2025 Loss Database). This guide delivers field-tested verification steps, with 2026-specific digital due diligence enhancements.
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Verification (Non-Negotiable Steps)
| Step | Critical Action | 2026-Specific Tools | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-reference Chinese business license (营业执照) via State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) API | • AI-powered SAMR/Customs linkage (2026 upgrade) • Blockchain-verified license history (e.g., AntChain) |
• Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) screenshot • Red Flag: USCC not matching physical address |
| 2. Export Capability Audit | Verify HS code-specific export history via China Customs Big Data Platform | • AI-driven export pattern analysis (2026 feature) • Real-time shipment tracking integration |
• Minimum 12 months of export records for your product category • Red Flag: Zero exports for target product category |
| 3. Facility Footprint Confirmation | Validate factory size/location via satellite imagery + IoT sensor data | • Planet Labs satellite API + on-site IoT beacons (2026 standard) • Automated facility dimension analysis |
• Geotagged photos of all production lines • Utility meter readings (electricity/gas) matching scale |
| 4. Technical Capability Proof | Demand process-specific certifications (not generic ISO) | • Digital twin validation of production lines • AI audit of engineering logs (2026) |
• SMT line speed test videos • Material traceability system screenshots |
Key 2026 Shift: Physical audits alone are insufficient. 78% of fraudulent suppliers now pass basic on-site checks (SourcifyChina 2025 Field Data). Digital footprint triangulation is mandatory.
Phase 2: Trading Company vs. Factory Identification
Trading companies add 12-18% hidden costs and obscure quality accountability. Distinguish using these evidence tiers:
| Verification Point | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | 2026 Detection Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Assets | • Direct utility bills (water/electricity) • Property deeds for factory land |
• Bills show “management company” name • Leases with vague terms |
• AI cross-check of utility payment records via China Power Grid API • Blockchain land registry verification |
| Production Control | • Real-time access to ERP/MES system • Direct payroll records for line workers |
• “Factory manager” unreachable • Payroll data withheld as “confidential” |
• IoT sensor data feed integration • Biometric attendance system access |
| R&D Capability | • Patents filed under factory name • In-house tooling/design team |
• Patents owned by third party • “Engineering” done off-site |
• CNIPA patent database API scan • CAD software license verification |
| Supply Chain Depth | • Raw material purchase contracts • In-house plating/molding |
• Component invoices from other factories • No material testing lab |
• AI analysis of procurement records • Raw material inventory drone scan |
Critical Insight: 63% of “factories” claiming Google/Fitbit contracts are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025). Demand proof of direct PO history with target brands—not just “we supplied components.”
Phase 3: High-Risk Red Flags (2026 Update)
| Red Flag Category | Specific Warning Signs | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| Digital Deception | • AI-generated facility tour videos • “Deepfake” executive interviews • Blockchain certificates with invalid hashes |
• Run video through Adobe Content Credentials API • Demand live drone flyover during audit |
| Financial Instability | • USCC status: “Abnormal Operation” • Frequent legal disputes (>3 in 12 mos) • Export credit insurance suspended |
• SAMR dispute database scan • Ping An Insurance API check |
| Operational Misalignment | • No in-house QA for critical processes (e.g., RF testing) • Refusal to share production schedule • All communication via non-company email |
• Demand live access to QA testing logs • Require ERP system login for schedule |
| Ethical Compliance | • ILO violation history • Environmental penalties in last 24 mos • No SMETA audit in 18 mos |
• ILO China violation database check • MEP environmental penalty API |
2026 Enforcement Trend: Chinese regulators now revoke export licenses for 3+ ILO violations. Verify via Customs Enterprise Credit Management System before PO issuance.
SourcifyChina Implementation Protocol
- Pre-RFQ: Run AI supplier screening via SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verification Matrix (free for procurement managers: scn.audit/2026)
- Contract Stage: Mandate blockchain-anchored quality clauses with IoT sensor triggers (e.g., humidity >65% auto-halts production)
- Ongoing: Integrate real-time factory performance dashboards (energy use, output rates, defect logs) into your ERP
“In 2026, verification isn’t due diligence—it’s operational necessity. Suppliers resisting digital transparency lack scalability for global brands.”
— James Li, Head of Verification, SourcifyChina (14 yrs China manufacturing audit experience)
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: This report reflects field-tested protocols as of Q1 2026. Regulations and tech evolve—subscribe to our Procurement Intelligence Hub for real-time updates. Never rely solely on supplier-provided documents.
Next Step: Request your customized Supplier Risk Scorecard at scn.pro/risk (Validated against 22,000+ Chinese manufacturers).
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy with Verified Excellence
In 2026, global procurement continues to face mounting challenges—supply chain volatility, quality inconsistencies, and the high cost of supplier due diligence. For buyers seeking reliable partners in China, identifying legitimate, high-performance suppliers is no longer a matter of convenience—it is a strategic imperative.
A common yet critical sourcing objective involves identifying companies affiliated with global tech leaders such as Google in China. However, searches for “Google company in China” often return misleading results, unauthorized resellers, or fraudulent entities claiming affiliations. This not only wastes valuable time but exposes procurement teams to compliance risks and operational disruptions.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Risk & Saves Time
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is engineered specifically for B2B procurement professionals who demand accuracy, compliance, and efficiency. Our proprietary supplier validation framework includes:
- On-the-ground audits by in-China sourcing experts
- Legal entity verification via Chinese business registries (e.g., Tianyancha, Qichacha)
- Facility inspections and production capability assessments
- Client reference validation and export compliance checks
- Continuous monitoring for performance and legitimacy
For searches like “Google company in China,” our Pro List delivers only pre-qualified suppliers that are either:
- Authorized partners or distributors of Google-affiliated technologies (e.g., Android ecosystem, Google Cloud resellers)
- OEM/ODM manufacturers compliant with international IP and export standards
- Verified electronics, hardware, or software development firms operating legally in China
This eliminates up to 80% of initial supplier screening time and reduces the risk of engaging with unverified vendors.
Time-Saving Impact: Before vs. After SourcifyChina
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach (Days) | With SourcifyChina Pro List (Days) |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 10–14 | 1–2 |
| Background & Legitimacy Checks | 7–10 | 0 (pre-verified) |
| Initial Communication & RFQ Setup | 5–7 | 2–3 |
| Factory Audit & Qualification | 14–21 | 3–5 (optional deep-dive) |
| Total Time to Qualified Supplier | 36–52 days | 6–10 days |
Source: 2025 client benchmark data from 47 procurement teams across EU, North America, and APAC.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals Today
Every day spent vetting unverified suppliers is a day lost in time-to-market, increased costs, and missed opportunities. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List transforms your China sourcing from a high-risk undertaking into a streamlined, data-driven advantage.
Don’t risk procurement delays or counterfeit partnerships. Leverage our on-the-ground expertise and access only the suppliers that meet global compliance and performance standards.
📞 Contact us today to request your customized Pro List:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to support your team with real-time insights, supplier shortlists, and end-to-end procurement guidance tailored to your product category and volume requirements.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to Reliable China Sourcing.
Trusted by 320+ global brands in 2025. Scale smarter in 2026.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
