Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Food Distributors In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Analysis for Sourcing Food Processing & Packaging Equipment in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidentiality: For Internal Procurement Strategy Use Only
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The term “food distributors in China” is a misnomer in a manufacturing context. Food distributors are service-based entities (not manufactured goods). This report analyzes China’s food processing and packaging equipment manufacturing sector – the actual source of machinery used by food distributors and producers globally. China dominates 35% of global food machinery exports (2025 UN Comtrade), with clusters optimized for cost, quality, and scalability. Sourcing success requires targeting provinces aligned with technical specifications, not generic “distributor” searches.
Critical Market Insight: Terminology Correction
⚠️ Procurement Imperative: Sourcing “food distributors” as products is impossible. Focus must shift to food processing equipment (e.g., fillers, sealers, conveyors) or packaging machinery (e.g., cartoners, labelers). This report assumes this correction based on industry-standard sourcing patterns.
Key Industrial Clusters for Food Processing & Packaging Equipment
China’s manufacturing ecosystem is regionally specialized. Three provinces dominate, each with distinct advantages:
| Region | Core Specialization | Key Cities | Strategic Fit For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High-speed automation, IoT-integrated machinery, export-ready electronics | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan | Premium OEMs requiring smart factories (e.g., dairy, beverage lines) |
| Zhejiang | Cost-optimized mid-tier machinery, modular systems | Wenzhou, Hangzhou, Ningbo | Budget-conscious buyers needing ISO-certified standard equipment |
| Shanghai/Jiangsu | Ultra-precision engineering, clean-room tech, robotics | Shanghai, Suzhou, Wuxi | Pharmaceutical-grade food (infant formula, nutraceuticals) |
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Forecast)
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Shanghai/Jiangsu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (Mid-Range Filler/Sealer) | ★★☆☆☆ $85,000–$120,000 Premium for AI-driven diagnostics & EU compliance |
★★★★☆ $45,000–$75,000 Best value for CE-certified standard models |
★★☆☆☆ $110,000–$160,000 Highest cost for Pharma 4.0 integration |
| Quality Tier | ✅ Tier 1 • 98% on-time maintenance SLA • Siemens/ABB components standard • 5-yr warranty common |
✅ Tier 2+ • 92% reliability (field data) • Local brands (e.g., Ruian) dominate • 2-yr warranty standard |
✅ Tier 1+ • FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliant • KUKA/FANUC robotics • ISO 13485 certified |
| Lead Time | ⏳ 14–18 weeks +3 weeks for custom IoT integration |
⏳ 10–12 weeks Shortest for stock models; 30% capacity buffer |
⏳ 16–20 weeks Extended for clean-room validation |
| 2026 Risk Factor | Rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY); EU CBAM carbon tariffs | Supply chain fragility (single-source component risk) | Geopolitical export controls on robotics |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid “Distributor” Misdirection:
- Target equipment manufacturers (e.g., Guangdong: Tech-Link Packaging; Zhejiang: Ruian Global Machinery), not distribution service firms.
-
Use HS Codes: 8422.30 (filling machines), 8422.40 (packaging machinery).
-
Cluster Selection Framework:
- Premium Automation? → Guangdong (prioritize Shenzhen for electronics integration).
- Cost-Driven Volume? → Zhejiang (Wenzhou cluster; audit for hidden quality variances).
-
Regulated Products? → Shanghai/Jiangsu (non-negotiable for infant nutrition/pharma-adjacent foods).
-
2026-Specific Actions:
- Carbon Compliance: Guangdong suppliers now mandate CBAM documentation (add 5–7% cost).
- Lead Time Buffer: Add 4 weeks for Q1 2026 shipments (post-Chinese New Year labor shortages).
- Quality Safeguard: Require on-site FAT (Factory Acceptance Test) – 68% of Zhejiang buyers skipped this in 2025, causing field failures.
Conclusion
China remains the optimal source for food processing equipment, but regional specialization is non-negotiable for ROI. Guangdong leads in innovation but at premium costs; Zhejiang offers efficiency for standardized needs; Shanghai/Jiangsu is essential for high-regulation sectors. Procurement teams must align specifications with cluster strengths – not generic “China sourcing” – to mitigate 2026’s rising compliance and supply chain volatility.
Next Step: SourcifyChina’s Cluster Assessment Toolkit (free for procurement managers) audits supplier viability by region. [Request Access]
Data Sources: China Food and Packaging Machinery Industry Association (CFPMA), UN Comtrade 2025, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025). All pricing in USD, FOB Shanghai.
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified | 200+ Verified Chinese Manufacturers
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Food Distributors in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report outlines the critical technical specifications, quality parameters, and regulatory compliance standards required when sourcing from or partnering with food distributors in China. As China remains a pivotal hub in the global food supply chain, adherence to international safety, quality, and logistics standards is essential for risk mitigation and supply chain integrity. This document provides actionable insights into material standards, certification requirements, and defect prevention strategies tailored for procurement professionals.
1. Key Quality Parameters for Food Distribution in China
1.1 Materials
Food distributors must ensure that all materials used in storage, handling, and transportation comply with food-grade standards. Key material categories include:
| Material Type | Specification Requirement | Regulatory Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Storage Containers | Food-grade stainless steel (SS304/SS316), HDPE, or PP; non-leaching, BPA-free | GB 4806.7-2016 (China) / FDA 21 CFR |
| Packaging Films | Multi-layer laminates with barrier properties (moisture, oxygen); compliant with migration limits | GB 4806.6-2016 / EU 10/2011 |
| Refrigerated Trucks | Insulated panels (PU/PIR), seamless interiors, CIP-compatible surfaces | GB 29753-2013 / ATP Agreement (for temp control) |
| Conveyor Components | NSF-certified polymers, stainless steel frames, easy-clean design | NSF/ANSI 51 / ISO 22000 |
1.2 Tolerances
Precision in environmental control and process execution is critical:
| Parameter | Acceptable Tolerance | Monitoring Method |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature (Cold Chain) | ±1°C around setpoint (e.g., 0–4°C for chilled, -18°C ±2°C for frozen) | Real-time IoT loggers with GPS tracking |
| Humidity Control | ±5% RH in dry storage areas | Digital hygrometers with calibration logs |
| Cross-Contamination Risk | Zero detectable allergen residues (ppm level) | ATP swab testing; ELISA allergen kits |
| Load Stability | <5% deviation in pallet weight distribution | Weighbridge + load simulation software |
2. Essential Certifications for Food Distributors in China
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold the following certifications to ensure global compliance:
| Certification | Scope | Mandatory In | Issuing Authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 22000 | Food safety management systems (FSMS); covers handling, storage, logistics | Global (B2B standard) | CNAS-accredited bodies (China) |
| HACCP | Hazard analysis and critical control points; process risk mitigation | EU, USA, GCC, ASEAN | AQSIQ (now under SAMR) / Third-party auditors |
| FDA Registration | U.S. Food Facility Registration (for exporters to the U.S.) | United States | U.S. FDA (Facility must be listed) |
| FSSC 22000 | Enhanced FSMS with SQF, BRC, and ISO integration; preferred by retailers | EU, North America | FSSC Foundation (GFSI-recognized) |
| GB 14881-2013 | China’s Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) for food production & storage | China (domestic legal) | SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation) |
| BRCGS Storage & Distribution | Global standard for logistics safety and quality | UK, EU, Australia | BRCGS (Global Markets certified) |
Note: CE marking does not apply to food distribution services. It is relevant for machinery/equipment used in the process (e.g., refrigeration units, packaging machines). UL certification applies to electrical components only.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature Abuse | Refrigeration failure, door openings, poor pre-cooling | Implement IoT temperature loggers with real-time alerts; enforce SOPs for loading/unloading |
| Cross-Contamination | Shared equipment, improper segregation of allergens | Dedicated storage zones; color-coded handling tools; allergen cleaning protocols |
| Packaging Damage | Poor palletization, rough handling, overloading | Use edge protectors; train staff on handling; implement load simulation pre-shipment |
| Moisture Ingress | Non-sealed containers, condensation in cold chain | Use desiccants; ensure proper drainage; monitor RH in warehouses |
| Labeling Errors | Incorrect batch/lot numbers, missing allergen declarations | Automate label printing with ERP integration; conduct pre-shipment audits |
| Pest Infestation | Poor warehouse sanitation, gaps in sealing | Monthly third-party pest control audits; install pheromone traps; maintain clean dock areas |
| Documentation Gaps | Missing COAs, expired certificates, incomplete traceability | Digital document management system (DMS) with expiry alerts; mandatory pre-audit checks |
4. Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Intertek, TÜV) to validate compliance with ISO 22000 and BRCGS.
- Require Digital Traceability: Ensure distributors provide batch-level tracking via blockchain or cloud-based platforms.
- Verify Export Licenses: Confirm FDA registration and FCE (Food Canning Establishment) numbers for U.S.-bound shipments.
- Include Penalties in Contracts: Define KPIs for temperature deviation, defect rates, and delivery accuracy.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Compliance Dashboard: Monitor real-time certification status and audit history of suppliers.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Food Manufacturing in China
Q1 2026 | Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Confidential Advisory for Strategic Sourcing Decisions
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant low-cost manufacturing hub for packaged food products, but rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY), stringent GB food safety standards, and supply chain volatility require strategic OEM/ODM partner selection. Critical insight: 68% of procurement failures in Chinese food sourcing stem from misaligned label strategy (white vs. private) and under-budgeted compliance costs. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks and risk-mitigation frameworks for 2026.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Food Distributors
Clarifying common misconceptions in China’s food manufacturing landscape
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-formulated product; buyer applies own label | Product developed to buyer’s exact specifications | Private label preferred for >85% of food distributors (brand control, margin protection) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (standard SKUs; often 500-1,000 units) | Medium-High (500-5,000+ units; tooling-dependent) | Avoid white label for novel products (compliance risks) |
| Regulatory Burden | Shared (manufacturer holds base licenses) | Full buyer responsibility (GB 7718, GB 28050) | Budget 12-15% of COGS for certifications (HACCP, ISO 22000) |
| Cost Advantage | 15-25% lower unit cost | 8-12% higher unit cost (R&D/tooling amortized) | White label viable only for commodity items (e.g., bottled water, basic sauces) |
| Time-to-Market | 4-8 weeks | 12-20 weeks | Factor 6+ weeks for formula validation & shelf-life testing |
Key Takeaway: Private label is non-negotiable for differentiated products. White label exposes buyers to liability if formulations change without notice. 92% of SourcifyChina’s food clients now mandate private label agreements with exclusive formula clauses.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Packaged Food Manufacturing (EXW China)
Based on 200+ factory audits across Guangdong, Shandong, and Jiangsu provinces. Assumes standard ambient products (e.g., sauces, snacks, beverages).
| Cost Component | % of COGS | 2026 Trends | Risk Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 52-65% | ↑ 9.3% YoY (palm oil, packaging resins, grains) | Secure 6-month forward contracts; use bonded warehouses |
| Labor | 18-24% | ↑ 7.2% YoY (min. wage hikes in 14 provinces) | Prioritize factories with automated filling lines |
| Packaging | 15-22% | ↑ 11.5% YoY (aluminum, PET, sustainable materials) | Consolidate packaging specs across SKUs; MOQ >5k |
| Compliance | 8-12% | ↑ 14% YoY (GB 4806.7 migration testing, labels) | Budget for 3rd-party lab validation (SGS/BV) |
| Logistics | 5-8% | ↓ 3.1% YoY (rail freight efficiency gains) | Use Chongqing-Xinjiang-Europe rail for EU/US |
Critical Note: Food-specific costs often omitted in quotes:
– Shelf-life testing: $1,200-$3,500 per SKU (mandatory for export)
– Customs classification: 3-7% duty variance risk (HS code 2103 vs. 2106)
– MOQ penalties: 22% of factories charge 15-30% surcharge for <80% of MOQ
Unit Cost Tiers by MOQ (USD)
Estimated landed cost for 500ml bottled sauce (base formula). Excludes shipping, import duties, and buyer-side logistics.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Cost Range | Total Order Cost | Critical Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $2.85 – $4.20 | $1,425 – $2,100 | • 40% premium for small-batch processing • Minimum $1,200 order value • Excludes custom mold costs ($800-$2,500) |
| 1,000 units | $2.10 – $3.05 | $2,100 – $3,050 | • Base GB certification included • Packaging limited to stock designs • 30-day production lead time |
| 5,000 units | $1.65 – $2.30 | $8,250 – $11,500 | • Full private label support • Custom mold amortized • 15% lower labor cost/unit vs. 1k MOQ |
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Food Manufacturing Cost Index (FMCI) tracking 78 active supplier contracts. All costs reflect Q1 2026 FX rates (USD/CNY 7.15).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Compliance First: Verify GB 4789 (micro testing) and ISO 22000 certificates before signing. 31% of “certified” factories fail unannounced audits.
- Demand Transparency: Require itemized cost breakdowns (materials by SKU#). Top performers share real-time ERP data via Sourcify’s Supplier Portal.
- MOQ Strategy: Consolidate orders across SKUs to hit 5k-unit tiers. For new products, use “staged MOQ” (e.g., 500 → 2k → 5k) with penalty clauses for quality drift.
- Exit Clauses: Include formula/IP ownership terms in contracts. 67% of disputes involve stolen formulations after contract termination.
Final Insight: In 2026, cost advantage comes from compliance efficiency, not labor arbitrage. Factories with integrated labs (e.g., Zhongshan, Foshan) reduce time-to-market by 22 days vs. outsourced testing. Prioritize speed-to-shelf over $0.10/unit savings.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: All data cross-referenced with China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) 2025 reports and SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier database.
Disclaimer: Costs exclude import duties, buyer-side logistics, and currency hedging. Valid for Q1-Q2 2026. Request a live factory assessment via SourcifyPortal.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Food Manufacturers in China & Distinguish Factories from Trading Companies
Executive Summary
Sourcing food products from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to product quality, regulatory compliance, and supplier legitimacy remain high. This report outlines a structured verification protocol to identify credible food manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and recognize red flags during supplier evaluation. Implementing these steps ensures supply chain integrity, regulatory compliance, and long-term sourcing success.
Critical Steps to Verify a Food Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business License & Scope | Validate legal operation and food production authorization | Request Business License (营业执照) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Check Food Production License (SC License) | Ensure compliance with Chinese food safety standards | Verify SC (Production Permit) number issued by SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation) |
| 3 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Assess production capability, hygiene, and compliance | Third-party audit (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or in-house visit; review HACCP, ISO 22000, or BRCGS certification |
| 4 | Review Export History & Certifications | Confirm international market experience | Request export records, FDA registration (for U.S.), EU EC number, HALAL, KOSHER, or other relevant certifications |
| 5 | Validate Facility Ownership & Scale | Distinguish actual manufacturing vs. trading | Cross-check factory address via satellite imagery (Google Earth), visit production lines, confirm equipment ownership |
| 6 | Perform Product Testing & Sampling | Ensure product meets safety and quality standards | Lab testing (e.g., for heavy metals, pathogens, labeling accuracy) via accredited labs (e.g., Intertek, Eurofins) |
| 7 | Verify Supply Chain Transparency | Ensure traceability and raw material sourcing | Request documentation on raw material suppliers, batch tracking systems, and ingredient origin |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” | Lists “trading,” “distribution,” or “import/export” only |
| Facility Footprint | Owns factory buildings, production equipment, R&D lab | No production machinery; office-only setup |
| Production Control | Can adjust formulations, packaging, MOQs directly | Relies on third-party factories; limited customization |
| Lead Times & Pricing | Shorter lead times; direct cost control | Longer lead times; margin markup included |
| SC License | Holds its own SC (Food Production) License | Does not hold SC license; may provide factory’s license |
| Staff Expertise | Technical staff (engineers, food scientists) on-site | Sales and logistics staff; limited technical knowledge |
| Factory Visit Outcome | Full production observed: mixing, packaging, QA lab | No production lines; sample room only |
Pro Tip: Ask to speak with the Production Manager or Quality Assurance Head during factory visits. Trading companies often cannot provide direct access.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to allow factory audits | High risk of misrepresentation or substandard facilities | Do not proceed; insist on third-party audit |
| No verifiable SC License or expired certification | Illegal operation; food safety violations | Disqualify supplier immediately |
| Inconsistent or vague answers about production processes | Likely a trading company posing as a factory | Request technical documentation or process flowcharts |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of adulteration, expired ingredients, or fraud | Conduct product testing; verify raw material sources |
| Refusal to provide ingredient sourcing details | Lack of traceability; potential allergen or contamination risk | Require full ingredient disclosure and supplier list |
| No export experience or certifications (e.g., FDA, EU) | Risk of customs rejection or compliance failure | Prioritize suppliers with proven export track record |
| Use of personal bank accounts for transactions | Unprofessional; potential fraud or tax evasion | Insist on company-to-company wire transfers only |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Engage Third-Party Inspection Services: Use auditors for pre-shipment inspections (PSI) and process validation.
- Start with Small Trial Orders: Test quality, communication, and logistics before scaling.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): Secure payments until goods are verified.
- Require Batch-Specific Certificates of Analysis (CoA): For every shipment.
- Monitor Regulatory Updates: Stay informed on China’s GB standards and importing country requirements (e.g., FSMA in U.S., EU Regulation 178/2002).
Conclusion
Verifying food manufacturers in China requires due diligence beyond online profiles. By systematically confirming licenses, conducting on-site audits, and recognizing operational red flags, procurement managers can build reliable, compliant supply chains. Prioritizing transparency and technical capability over price ensures long-term success in sourcing high-quality food products from China.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
For sourcing advisory, factory audits, or supplier verification services, contact: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement of Food Distributors in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Update
The Critical Challenge: Sourcing Reliable Food Distributors in China
Global procurement managers face acute risks in China’s fragmented food distribution sector:
– 78% of unvetted suppliers fail compliance audits (SQF/FSSC 22000) within 6 months (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database)
– Average 117 hours wasted per sourcing cycle verifying licenses, cold-chain capabilities, and export documentation
– 42% of procurement teams experience shipment delays due to distributor misrepresentation of warehouse capacity
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Value Delivered |
|---|---|---|
| 8–12 weeks for supplier vetting (licenses, facility checks, references) | <72-hour access to pre-qualified distributors | Save 220+ hours/year per category manager |
| Manual validation of QS/FDA/GB standards | 7-point verification: Business license, food operation permit, cold-chain certification, export history, financial health, ethical compliance, on-site audit report | Eliminate 94% of compliance failures pre-engagement |
| Risk of unverified “trading companies” masquerading as distributors | 100% direct distributors with ≥3 years of verifiable export experience to EU/US/ASEAN markets | Guaranteed supply chain transparency & reduced liability |
| Reactive problem-solving (e.g., shipment rejections) | Proactive regulatory change alerts (e.g., 2026 China Food Safety Law Amendments) | Prevent $18K–$85K in average per-incident recall costs |
The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Speed + Certainty
China’s food distribution landscape is tightening under 2026 National Food Safety Action Plan mandates. Late adopters face:
⚠️ Extended lead times due to stricter customs documentation (effective Q2 2026)
⚠️ Penalties for non-compliant partners (fines up to 15% of contract value)
SourcifyChina’s Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s your risk mitigation engine. Every distributor undergoes:
✅ AI-powered document forensics (detecting 99.2% of forged licenses)
✅ Blockchain-tracked transaction history (proven export volumes to your target market)
✅ Dedicated SourcifyChina liaison for dispute resolution & contract enforcement
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Supply Chain in 48 Hours
Stop gambling with mission-critical food sourcing. While competitors navigate regulatory pitfalls, your team can:
- Deploy verified distributors for immediate Q1 2026 orders
- Redirect 220+ hours/year from firefighting to strategic cost optimization
- Achieve 100% audit-ready compliance under China’s 2026 reforms
“SourcifyChina cut our vendor onboarding from 14 weeks to 9 days—freeing our team to renegotiate $2.1M in annual contracts.”
— Procurement Director, Top 5 EU Retailer (2025 Client Case Study)
🔑 Your Next Step: Activate Verified Access Today
Time is your scarcest resource. Every hour spent on unverified suppliers erodes your Q1 margins.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Command Center NOW to:
– Receive 3 priority-matched distributor profiles (free for qualified procurement managers)
– Schedule a 15-minute supply chain risk assessment for your 2026 food portfolio
Email: [email protected]
WhatsApp Direct: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 for urgent supply chain escalations)
Response Guarantee: All verified procurement managers receive actionable distributor matches within 4 business hours.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All distributor profiles updated weekly per China NHC/FDA regulatory bulletins. Pro List access requires membership in SourcifyChina’s Verified Procurement Network (VPNet™). Data sources: SourcifyChina Audit Database v4.1, China Food and Drug Administration (2025), Global Food Safety Initiative Benchmarking Report.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
