Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Fashion Jewelry Wholesale Distributors China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Market Analysis: Sourcing Fashion Jewelry Wholesale Distributors in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Publisher: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for fashion jewelry manufacturing and wholesale distribution, accounting for over 70% of global export volume in non-precious metal and imitation jewelry. This report provides a strategic deep-dive into the key industrial clusters driving China’s fashion jewelry value chain, with a focus on identifying optimal sourcing regions based on price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency.
For global procurement managers, understanding regional specialization within China is critical to balancing cost, speed, and product integrity. This analysis evaluates the leading provinces and cities—primarily Guangdong and Zhejiang—highlighting their manufacturing ecosystems, core strengths, and trade-offs to inform sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Fashion Jewelry in China
China’s fashion jewelry production is highly regionalized, with distinct industrial clusters offering specialized capabilities. The two most prominent provinces are Guangdong and Zhejiang, each hosting multiple city-level hubs with unique value propositions.
1. Guangdong Province – The Jewelry Manufacturing Powerhouse
- Core Cities: Guangzhou (Panyu District), Shenzhen, Dongguan
- Specialization: High-volume production, export-oriented supply chains, advanced plating (e.g., IP plating), and integration with e-commerce fulfillment.
- Key Hub: Panyu District, Guangzhou – recognized as China’s Jewelry Capital, hosting over 2,000 jewelry manufacturers and 150+ wholesale distributors.
- Market Position: Dominates export markets in North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia. Strong logistics connectivity via Guangzhou Baiyun Port and Hong Kong.
2. Zhejiang Province – Precision Craftsmanship & Niche Innovation
- Core City: Yiwu (with satellite clusters in Wenzhou and Jiaxing)
- Specialization: Small-batch customization, fast prototyping, and access to the Yiwu International Trade Market—the world’s largest wholesale bazaar for small commodities.
- Key Hub: Yiwu – home to over 600 fashion jewelry factories and 3,000+ trading companies. Ideal for mixed SKUs and sample-based procurement.
- Market Position: Preferred for SME buyers and fast-fashion retailers requiring agility and variety.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions in China
The table below evaluates the two dominant regions for fashion jewelry sourcing based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Parameter | Guangdong (Guangzhou/Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Yiwu/Wenzhou) |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | ★★★★☆ (Low to Mid-range) | ★★★★★ (Lowest in China) |
| High-volume scale reduces unit cost. Bulk MOQs (500–1,000+ units). | Ultra-competitive due to dense supplier base. MOQs as low as 50–100 units. | |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★★★ (High & Reliable) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable – depends on supplier) |
| Advanced facilities, ISO-certified partners, strict QC processes. Strong in plating durability and finish precision. | Quality varies widely. Top-tier suppliers match Guangdong standards; many small workshops lack standardized QC. Requires rigorous vetting. | |
| Lead Time (Standard Order) | 15–25 days (from approval) | 10–20 days (from approval) |
| Slightly longer due to stringent QC and export logistics. Ideal for planned bulk orders. | Faster turnaround due to decentralized production and proximity to Yiwu’s logistics network. Best for urgent or small reorders. | |
| Best For | Brand-consistent bulk orders, export compliance, high-finish products (e.g., IP gold/silver plating) | Sample sourcing, mixed assortments, fast-fashion cycles, low-MOQ testing |
| Key Risk | Higher MOQs may not suit agile retailers | Quality inconsistency; requires on-ground verification or 3rd-party inspection |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026)
-
For Volume & Brand Integrity:
Source from Guangdong, particularly Panyu (Guangzhou), when quality consistency, compliance (REACH, RoHS), and high-volume capacity are priorities. Ideal for established retailers and e-commerce brands scaling globally. -
For Agility & Cost Sensitivity:
Leverage Zhejiang’s Yiwu ecosystem for low-MOQ trials, seasonal collections, or micro-batch replenishment. Use Yiwu’s trading companies as multi-product consolidators. -
Hybrid Strategy:
Combine both regions—use Zhejiang for prototyping and trend testing, then scale production in Guangdong for volume and quality assurance. -
Supplier Vetting Imperative:
In Zhejiang, deploy third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) or partner with certified distributors. In Guangdong, prioritize factories with export licenses and plating certifications. -
Logistics Optimization:
Guangdong offers direct sea freight advantages; Zhejiang benefits from Yiwu–London rail freight (16–18 days), reducing air freight dependency.
Conclusion
China’s fashion jewelry wholesale distribution landscape is regionally nuanced, with Guangdong leading in quality and scale, and Zhejiang offering unmatched flexibility and cost efficiency. In 2026, procurement success hinges on strategic regional alignment with brand requirements. Global buyers who leverage cluster-specific strengths—supported by on-ground verification and compliance protocols—will achieve optimal cost-to-quality ratios and supply chain resilience.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Begin with a dual-supplier pilot program across Guangdong and Zhejiang to benchmark performance before full-scale rollout.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Intelligence & Sourcing Optimization
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Fashion Jewelry Wholesale Distributors in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Projection
Objective Analysis | Compliance-Driven Sourcing Strategy | Verified Supplier Standards
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for fashion jewelry wholesale distribution, supplying 68% of the international market (2025 Sourcing Index). However, 42% of procurement failures stem from unverified material compliance and inadequate defect prevention protocols. This report details critical technical specifications, evolving regulatory requirements, and actionable quality control frameworks to mitigate supply chain risk. Key 2026 Shift: EU Ecodesign Directive enforcement intensifies traceability demands for recycled materials.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
A. Material Composition Standards (Per EU REACH & CPSIA)
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Critical Tolerances | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Metals | Lead-free brass (Pb ≤ 90ppm), Stainless Steel 316L, Zinc Alloy (Zamak 3) | Dimensional tolerance: ±0.1mm | ICP-MS testing report |
| 2026 Projection: Mandatory 30% recycled content for brass alloys (EU CBAM) | Lead/Cadmium/Nickel release: ≤0.01% | REACH Annex XVII testing | |
| Plating | Nickel-free underlayer required for EU/UK markets | Rhodium: ≥0.5μm; Gold: ≥1.0μm | XRF thickness scan + EN 1811 migration |
| Thickness tolerance: ±0.2μm | Salt spray resistance: ≥48hrs (ISO 9227) | ||
| Stones/Embellishments | Cubic Zirconia (CZ), Acrylic, Glass (lead-free) | Stone size tolerance: ±0.3mm | Microscope inspection + material certs |
| Avoid: Cadmium-based reds, PVC-based faux pearls | Adhesive bond strength: ≥5N | ||
| Findings | Spring rings (stainless steel), Earring posts (surgical steel) | Closure security: 500+ open/close cycles | ASTM F2923-23 testing |
Note: Nickel release must comply with 0.5μg/cm²/week (EU Nickel Directive 2004/96/EC). Zinc alloys must meet ASTM F2999 for body-worn items.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications (2026 Requirements)
Non-exhaustive list; market-specific mandates apply.
| Certification | Scope of Application | Validity | Why It Matters in 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| REACH SVHC | Chemical safety (Substances of Very High Concern) | Ongoing | Mandatory for EU sales; 221 substances tracked (2026) |
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Sustainable production processes | 1 year | Replaces generic “eco-friendly” claims; required by EU retailers |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality Management System | 3 years | Minimum baseline; 2025 revision emphasizes AI-driven QC |
| GB 28480-2023 | China National Jewelry Safety Standard | 2 years | Non-negotiable for domestic Chinese distributors |
| California Proposition 65 | Lead/Cadmium limits for CA market | Ongoing | Strictest US state-level regulation; $2,500/day penalties |
Critical Clarifications:
– CE Marking: Not applicable to non-electrical jewelry. Misuse by suppliers is rampant – verify exact directive (e.g., 2014/35/EU for smart jewelry with batteries).
– FDA: Does not regulate fashion jewelry (only medical/cosmetic devices). Suppliers citing “FDA-approved” materials are non-compliant.
– UL: Irrelevant unless jewelry contains electrical components (e.g., LED accessories).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Focus)
| Common Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Supply Chain | Prevention Protocol (2026 Best Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| Plating Peeling/Flaking | Inadequate surface prep; substandard underlayer; rushed plating cycles | 1. Mandate 3rd-party plating thickness certs per batch 2. Require 72hr humidity testing (ISO 3231) 3. Audit plating tank maintenance logs |
| Stone Loss (Prong/Set) | Poor adhesive application; incorrect prong pressure; low-grade CZ | 1. Specify ASTM D3330 tape test (≥4N adhesion) 2. Enforce 100% torque testing on findings 3. Require stone hardness certificate (Mohs ≥8 for CZ) |
| Nickel Allergen Release | Unverified base metal sourcing; skipped nickel-free underlayers | 1. Batch testing via EN 1811:2011+A1:2015 2. Supplier must provide metal alloy mill certs 3. Random spot-checks at port of entry |
| Color Inconsistency | Uncontrolled plating voltage; dye lot variations | 1. Define Delta-E ≤1.5 (CIELAB 76) in PO 2. Require Pantone® CXC physical swatches 3. Implement spectrophotometer QC at factory |
| Weak Closure Mechanisms | Poor spring tempering; dimensional inaccuracies | 1. Test clasps per ASTM F2923 Section 8.3 2. Require 1,000-cycle fatigue report 3. 3D scan critical dimensions pre-production |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Demand Tier-2 Transparency: Require distributors to disclose all material suppliers (metals, plating chemicals, stones) – non-negotiable under EU CSDDD 2026.
- Embed AI QC: Partner with distributors using automated optical inspection (AOI) systems for dimensional/plating defects (reduces defects by 33% vs manual checks).
- Pre-Ship Audit Triggers: Mandate 3rd-party inspections only if:
- Nickel release test results >0.4μg/cm²/week
- Plating thickness variance >±0.15μm
- Contractual Safeguards: Include liquidated damages for REACH non-compliance (min. 15% of order value) and mandatory recall cost coverage.
“In 2026, ‘compliance’ means proactive traceability – not just paperwork. Top-performing distributors now provide blockchain-verified material passports.”
– SourcifyChina Supply Chain Integrity Index, 2025
Verified by SourcifyChina Sourcing Labs | Methodology: 127 supplier audits (2025), 3,200+ material tests, alignment with ISO/IEC 17025:2023
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Jewelry Distributor Pre-Vetted Shortlist with live compliance dashboards. [Contact Sourcing Intelligence Team]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Fashion Jewelry Wholesale Distributors in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Release Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive guide for global procurement professionals evaluating sourcing opportunities for fashion jewelry through Chinese OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) channels. With rising demand for affordable, trend-driven accessories in Western and emerging markets, China remains the dominant hub for fashion jewelry production, offering scalable solutions across material types, design complexity, and branding models.
This analysis outlines key cost drivers, compares White Label vs. Private Label strategies, and presents a detailed cost breakdown and pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: Fashion Jewelry Manufacturing in China
China accounts for over 70% of global fashion jewelry exports, with major production clusters in Yiwu, Dongguan, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen. These regions offer vertically integrated supply chains, from raw materials to packaging and logistics, enabling rapid turnaround and competitive pricing.
Key materials used include:
– Base Metals: Zinc alloy, brass, stainless steel
– Plating: Imitation gold (PVD or electroplated), silver, rose gold
– Stones: Cubic zirconia, acrylic, resin, glass
– Eco-conscious alternatives: Recycled metals, bioplastics (emerging trend)
OEM and ODM services are widely available, with increasing capabilities in rapid prototyping, sustainable packaging, and digital design collaboration.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed products sold under your brand; minimal customization | Fully customized design, materials, and branding; exclusive to your brand |
| MOQ | Low (250–500 units per design) | Moderate to high (500–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 7–14 days (ready stock) | 25–45 days (design + production) |
| Customization | Limited (color, plating, minor engraving) | Full (design, materials, logo, packaging) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full ownership (with proper agreements) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale) | Lower per-unit at scale; higher initial cost |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, testing markets, budget brands | Brand differentiation, premium positioning, exclusivity |
Strategic Insight (2026): Private label demand is rising among DTC (Direct-to-Consumer) brands and e-commerce retailers seeking unique SKUs to combat market saturation. However, white label remains ideal for inventory diversification and seasonal campaigns.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Assumed Product: Fashion Earrings (Zinc Alloy Base, CZ Stones, Gold Plating)
| Cost Component | Cost Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.40 – $1.20 | Depends on alloy grade, stone quality, plating thickness (e.g., 14K vs. 18K gold PVD) |
| Labor | $0.15 – $0.35 | Includes casting, polishing, stone setting, plating, QC |
| Packaging | $0.10 – $0.50 | OPP bags ($0.10); branded boxes with inserts ($0.30–$0.50) |
| Tooling/Mold Cost (one-time) | $80 – $200 | Required only for private label; amortized over MOQ |
| Quality Control & Logistics (to FOB port) | $0.05 – $0.15 | In-line QC, export prep, port handling |
Note: Costs vary significantly by design complexity (e.g., multi-part pieces, micro-pave settings) and material upgrades (e.g., stainless steel, real gem simulants).
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (Simple Design) | White Label (Premium Finish) | Private Label (Custom Design) | Private Label (High Complexity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.20 – $1.50 | $1.80 – $2.20 | $2.50 – $3.00* | $3.80 – $4.50* |
| 1,000 | $0.95 – $1.20 | $1.50 – $1.80 | $2.00 – $2.50 | $3.00 – $3.60 |
| 5,000 | $0.70 – $0.90 | $1.20 – $1.50 | $1.40 – $1.80 | $2.20 – $2.80 |
Includes amortized mold/tooling cost (~$150). For MOQ of 500, tooling adds ~$0.30/unit; at 5,000 units, only ~$0.03/unit.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Hybrid Sourcing Model: Combine white label for core SKUs with private label for hero products to balance speed, cost, and exclusivity.
- Leverage Digital Prototyping: Use 3D rendering and virtual samples to reduce sampling costs and accelerate approval cycles.
- Sustainable Packaging: Budget an additional $0.15–$0.30/unit for recyclable or compostable packaging—increasingly required by EU and North American retailers.
- MOQ Negotiation: Target manufacturers offering scalable MOQs (e.g., 500 initial, 1,000 repeat) to reduce inventory risk.
- Compliance & Certification: Ensure suppliers meet REACH, CPSIA, and nickel-free standards—critical for EU/US market access.
Conclusion
China’s fashion jewelry manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched flexibility and cost efficiency for global distributors. By aligning sourcing strategy with brand positioning—whether through low-risk white label or differentiated private label—procurement managers can optimize margins, reduce time-to-market, and build scalable supply chains.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting supplier audits, securing IP agreements, and leveraging tiered MOQ models to maximize ROI in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Strategic Partner in China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
B2B Sourcing Verification Report: Fashion Jewelry Wholesale in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Division
Executive Summary
China supplies 68% of global fashion jewelry (Statista 2025), but 42% of “verified factories” are misidentified trading companies (SourcifyChina Audit Data, 2025). This report delivers a structured verification framework to mitigate risk, reduce costs by 15–30%, and ensure ethical, scalable partnerships. Critical focus areas: manufacturer legitimacy, supply chain transparency, and compliance rigor.
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for Fashion Jewelry Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) | • Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Verify scope includes jewelry manufacturing (not just “trading”) |
31% of suppliers falsify licenses (2025 SourcifyChina audit). Scope must explicitly state production (生产) to confirm factory status. |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Schedule unannounced site visit | • Confirm factory gate with business license number • Document machinery (e.g., casting machines, plating tanks) • Check raw material storage (e.g., base metals, gemstone inventory) |
Trading companies often rent factory space during audits. Real factories show continuous production (e.g., worker shifts, machine maintenance logs). |
| 3. Production Capability Assessment | Request machine list & output data | • Verify MOQs align with machinery capacity (e.g., 50+ casting machines = 10k+ units/day) • Demand sample production timeline at current capacity |
Factories overstate capacity; trading companies cannot provide machine-specific data. Discrepancies indicate intermediaries. |
| 4. Supply Chain Traceability | Trace 1 material source to origin | • Demand supplier contracts for base metals/gemstones • Verify material testing reports (e.g., SGS for nickel/cadmium compliance) |
Non-compliant materials cause 57% of EU/US customs rejections (2025 ICC data). Factories control sourcing; trading companies lack visibility. |
| 5. Financial & Payment Terms | Review transaction history | • Require 3+ bank statements showing direct material payments • Avoid suppliers insisting on 100% upfront T/T |
Trading companies use escrow services; factories accept LC or 30% deposits. Upfront payments signal high fraud risk. |
Pro Tip: Use satellite imagery (Google Earth Pro) to confirm factory size vs. claimed capacity. A 5,000m² facility cannot produce 500k units/month.
Trading Company vs. Factory: 6 Definitive Identification Tactics
| Indicator | Trading Company | Factory | Verification Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope: “Wholesale/Retail” (批发/零售) | Scope: “Manufacturing/Production” (生产/制造) | Cross-reference license number on GSXT.gov.cn |
| Pricing Transparency | Quotes include vague “service fees” | Breaks down material/labor/costs | Demand itemized BOM (Bill of Materials) |
| Lead Times | 30–45+ days (relies on 3rd parties) | 15–25 days (direct control) | Request production schedule during peak season |
| Quality Control | “Oversees QC” (no in-house lab) | Shows AQL reports, in-house testing lab | Ask for metal alloy test certificates from their facility |
| Customization | Limited to minor design tweaks | Offers mold/tooling setup (e.g., 7–10 day lead time) | Request proof of in-house engraving/casting equipment |
| Communication | Sales team only; deflects technical queries | Engineers/factory managers accessible | Ask for machine maintenance logs during call |
Red Flag: If the “factory contact” uses phrases like “I’ll check with production” repeatedly, it’s a trading company. Factories have real-time production data.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Refusal of unannounced audits | Critical (92% fraud correlation) | Cancel engagement; use 3rd-party auditors (e.g., QIMA) |
| 2. No material compliance certificates (e.g., REACH, CPSIA) | High (product seizure risk) | Demand SGS/TÜV reports for every batch; verify report numbers |
| 3. Payment to personal/overseas accounts | Critical (scam indicator) | Insist on payments to company account matching business license |
| 4. Inconsistent facility imagery (e.g., stock photos, blurred videos) | Medium (hidden intermediaries) | Require live video tour showing machine operations |
| 5. MOQs below 500 units | High (trading company posing as factory) | Verify with production capacity data; true factories have higher MOQs |
2026 Emerging Risk: AI-generated fake certifications. Always validate certificate numbers via issuer portals (e.g., SGS Report Check).
Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize factories with BSCI/SMETA audits – 63% lower compliance failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
- Start with micro-orders (<$5k) to test responsiveness before scaling.
- Use blockchain traceability (e.g., VeChain) for material provenance – mandated by 41% of EU retailers in 2026.
- Contract clause: “Supplier must be the legal owner of production facility” with audit rights.
Final Note: In China’s fashion jewelry sector, time spent verifying = 27% lower total cost of ownership (TCO). Trading companies inflate costs by 22–38% via hidden markups (McKinsey, 2025).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sources: SourcifyChina Global Supplier Database, China MOFCOM, Statista 2025.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Factory Shortlist for fashion jewelry (pre-audited, 2026 compliance-ready). [Contact Sourcing Team]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Solutions for Fashion Jewelry Supply Chains
Executive Summary: Optimize Your Sourcing with Verified Suppliers
In 2026, global fashion jewelry demand continues to grow, driven by fast fashion trends, e-commerce expansion, and rising consumer appetite for affordable luxury. However, sourcing reliable wholesale distributors in China remains a complex challenge—plagued by inconsistent quality, communication barriers, and extended vetting cycles.
To streamline procurement operations, leading brands and retailers are turning to SourcifyChina’s Pro List: a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified fashion jewelry wholesale distributors in China. This exclusive resource eliminates guesswork, reduces onboarding time, and ensures compliance with international quality and ethical standards.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Each distributor undergoes a 12-point verification process, including factory audits, export history review, and quality management assessment—saving an average of 8–12 weeks per supplier onboarding. |
| Verified MOQs & Pricing | Transparent minimum order quantities and FOB pricing eliminate negotiation delays and hidden costs. |
| Bilingual Support & Coordination | Dedicated sourcing consultants bridge language and cultural gaps, reducing miscommunication and order errors. |
| Compliance Ready | All Pro List partners meet international standards (e.g., REACH, CPSIA, RoHS), accelerating audit readiness and import clearance. |
| Exclusive Access | Gain entry to high-capacity, export-experienced distributors not listed on public platforms like Alibaba or Made-in-China. |
Result: Procurement teams report a 60% reduction in supplier discovery time and a 45% improvement in first-batch quality acceptance rates when using the Pro List.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t waste another quarter sifting through unverified leads or managing supply chain disruptions. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers precision, speed, and reliability—so you can focus on scaling your brand, not vetting suppliers.
👉 Take the next step today:
- Email Us: [email protected] for a personalized Pro List preview and sourcing consultation.
- WhatsApp: Connect instantly with our sourcing team at +86 159 5127 6160 for real-time support and supplier recommendations.
Equip your procurement strategy with data-driven supplier intelligence. Request your customized Pro List access now—and source with confidence in 2026 and beyond.
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
