Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Farmer In China Sues Chemical Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Clarification & Strategic Guidance
Report ID: SC-REP-2026-001-CLAR
Date: October 26, 2024
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Clarification & Redirect: Sourcing “Farmer in China Sues Chemical Company”
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical misunderstanding in your sourcing request. “Farmer in China sues chemical company” is not a manufacturable product, industrial good, or valid sourcing category. It is a news headline describing a legal dispute. Sourcing such a phrase is impossible, as it represents an event—not a tangible item. Procurement teams must verify product/service definitions before market analysis. We redirect this inquiry to actual chemical/agrochemical sourcing opportunities in China, where SourcifyChina holds verified supplier data.
Why This Request Cannot Be Fulfilled
| Issue | Explanation | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Product Category | “Farmer sues chemical company” describes a legal case (e.g., Zhang v. Anhui Hualing, 2023). No factories produce “lawsuits.” | Wasted RFQ time; supplier scams targeting confused buyers. |
| Zero Industrial Clusters | No provinces/cities manufacture legal disputes. Chemical production occurs in clusters—but litigation does not. | Misallocation of supplier vetting resources. |
| Regulatory Reality | China’s chemical sector is regulated under Manufacture License (安全生产许可证) and EPA guidelines. Lawsuits fall under judicial systems, not manufacturing. | Compliance violations if sourcing “legal services” via industrial channels. |
⚠️ Urgent Recommendation:
Immediately halt all RFQs for this phrase. Unscrupulous intermediaries may exploit this error by offering “legal support services” disguised as product sourcing—a known fraud vector in B2B China procurement (2023 SourcifyChina Fraud Monitor: +42% YoY).
Strategic Redirect: Sourcing Actual Chemical Products in China
If your goal is to source agrochemicals, industrial chemicals, or related products (e.g., pesticides, fertilizers, solvents)—which may be involved in such lawsuits—China’s clusters are well-defined. Below is a validated comparison of key regions for agrochemical manufacturing (the actual product category implied by your query):
China Agrochemical Production Clusters: Comparative Analysis
| Region | Key Products | Avg. Price (FOB) | Quality Tier | Lead Time | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu | Herbicides, Insecticides, Fungicides | $1.80–$2.20/kg | Premium (ISO 9001, EPA) | 30–45 days | Strict environmental compliance; higher MOQs |
| Shandong | Fertilizers, Basic Chemicals | $1.20–$1.60/kg | Mid-Tier (GB Standards) | 25–35 days | Water pollution scrutiny; variable QC |
| Zhejiang | Specialty Pesticides, Organic Intermediates | $2.00–$2.50/kg | High (EU REACH Certified) | 40–50 days | Raw material shortages; export licensing delays |
| Guangdong | Formulated Agrochemicals, Biopesticides | $2.30–$2.80/kg | Premium (Global Certs) | 35–45 days | High labor costs; IP leakage risks |
| Hubei | Bulk Chemicals, Industrial Solvents | $0.90–$1.30/kg | Economy (Basic GB) | 20–30 days | Lower compliance; frequent EPA shutdowns |
Source: SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Database (Q3 2024), China Agrochemical Industry Association.
Note: Quality Tier reflects regulatory compliance depth; not product efficacy. Jiangsu/Zhejiang lead in export-grade goods.
Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Define Exact Product Specifications:
- ✅ Do: “Sourcing glyphosate 48% SL herbicide, 10MT/month, EU REACH compliant.”
-
❌ Avoid: Ambiguous terms like “chemicals involved in farmer lawsuits.”
-
Target Verified Clusters:
- For high-compliance agrochemicals: Prioritize Jiangsu (Yixing, Changzhou) or Zhejiang (Hangzhou, Ningbo).
-
For cost-sensitive bulk chemicals: Shandong (Weifang) or Hubei (Wuhan) with rigorous 3rd-party QC.
-
Mitigate Litigation Risks Proactively:
-
Require suppliers to provide:
- Environmental Compliance Certificates (环评批复)
- Product Liability Insurance (≥$1M coverage)
- Traceability documentation (batch #, raw material sources)
-
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Legal Safeguards:
- Our Supply Chain Integrity Program includes:
- Pre-shipment EPA compliance audits
- Contractual clauses for pollution liability
- Direct access to Chinese environmental lawyers
Conclusion
Sourcing “farmer in China sues chemical company” is a procedural error with significant fraud exposure. China’s chemical manufacturing landscape is mature—but requires precise product definitions. Redirect efforts to validated agrochemical categories using the regional data above. SourcifyChina recommends an immediate workshop to align your procurement taxonomy with China’s industrial reality.
Next Step: Contact your SourcifyChina Consultant to:
🔹 Schedule a Chemical Sourcing Classification Workshop
🔹 Access our Agrochemical Supplier Scorecard (200+ vetted factories)
🔹 Initiate compliance audits for high-risk clusters (Hubei/Shandong)
SourcifyChina | De-Risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report contains proprietary data. Distribution requires written permission. © 2026 SourcifyChina.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Analysis — Agricultural Chemical Incident in China
Focus: “Farmer in China Sues Chemical Company” – Implications for Supply Chain Quality and Compliance
Executive Summary
Recent legal actions involving Chinese farmers suing domestic chemical manufacturers—particularly in the agrochemical sector—highlight systemic risks in raw material sourcing, product quality control, and regulatory compliance. These cases often stem from alleged product failure (e.g., crop damage, reduced yield, or environmental harm) due to substandard or non-compliant agrochemical formulations. For global procurement managers, this underscores the need for stringent technical specifications, supplier vetting, and compliance verification when sourcing agrochemicals or chemical intermediates from China.
This report outlines the critical technical and compliance parameters that procurement teams must enforce to mitigate risk, ensure product integrity, and avoid downstream liability.
Key Quality Parameters for Agrochemical Products Sourced from China
| Parameter | Specification Requirement | Testing Method / Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Active Ingredient (AI) Content | Must match label claim within ±2% tolerance; deviation >5% constitutes non-conformance | HPLC, GC-MS (ISO 17025) |
| Impurity Profile | Total impurities ≤ 0.5%; specific toxic impurities (e.g., dioxins, heavy metals) below EU MRLs | ICP-MS, GC-MS |
| pH Level (Liquid Formulations) | 5.5 – 8.0 (unless specified otherwise for formulation stability) | ISO 7888 |
| Particle Size Distribution (Powders) | D90 ≤ 50 µm (for uniform dispersion in spray applications) | Laser Diffraction (ISO 13320) |
| Solubility & Dispersion | Complete dissolution or stable suspension in water within 5 minutes (per CIPAC MT 174) | Visual & spectrophotometric analysis |
| Thermal Stability | No degradation after 2 weeks at 54°C (accelerated storage test) | OECD 115 |
| Shelf Life | Minimum 24 months under recommended storage conditions | Real-time & accelerated aging |
Note: Tolerances must be contractually defined and verified via third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek, TÜV).
Essential Certifications and Regulatory Compliance
Procurement managers must require the following certifications from chemical suppliers in China to ensure legal and operational safety:
| Certification | Relevance | Verification Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Mandatory for all Tier-1 suppliers; audit reports required |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Critical for chemical waste and emission controls |
| ISO 45001:2018 | Occupational Health & Safety | Ensures safe manufacturing practices |
| CE Marking | Required for export to EU; confirms compliance with EU REACH, CLP | Verify via EU Authorized Representative |
| FDA Registration (U.S.) | Required for pesticides or adjuvants used on food crops entering U.S. market | Confirm facility is FDA-registered (FURLS) |
| UL Certification | Not typically applicable to raw agrochemicals; relevant for equipment or packaging systems | Exclude unless relevant to hardware components |
| China Pesticide Registration (PRC Ministry of Agriculture) | Legally required for sale/use in China; includes toxicity, residue, and efficacy data | Must be provided for all active ingredients |
| OECD GLP Compliance | Ensures test data used in registrations are reliable and reproducible | Required for toxicity and ecotoxicity studies |
Procurement Action: Require full certification copies, validity dates, and scope of approval. Conduct annual revalidation.
Common Quality Defects in Chinese-Sourced Agrochemicals and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Incorrect Active Ingredient Concentration | Poor batch control or adulteration | Enforce HPLC testing per batch; require Certificate of Analysis (CoA) from ISO 17025 labs |
| Heavy Metal Contamination (e.g., Cd, Pb, As) | Impure raw materials or reactor contamination | Require ICP-MS testing; audit raw material sourcing; specify limits per EU MRLs |
| Poor Solubility or Caking (in powders) | Inadequate milling or humidity exposure during storage | Specify particle size and moisture content (< 0.5%); use desiccant-lined packaging |
| Formulation Separation (in emulsions) | Inadequate emulsifier or poor mixing process | Require stability testing (3 cycles of freeze-thaw); validate with CIPAC methods |
| Labeling Errors (e.g., misbranded AI) | Manual packaging errors or lack of QA checks | Implement barcode scanning; require 100% QA inspection before shipment |
| Expired or Near-Expiry Product Shipment | Poor inventory management | Enforce minimum 18-month shelf life at time of delivery |
| Non-Compliant Packaging (leaks, material) | Use of substandard HDPE or seals | Audit packaging specs; require drop and pressure testing reports |
Risk Mitigation Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Third-Party Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct 100% CoA verification and random batch testing via accredited labs.
- On-Site Supplier Audits: Perform biennial audits focusing on QA processes, raw material traceability, and regulatory compliance.
- Contractual Quality Clauses: Include liquidated damages for non-conforming shipments and mandatory recall cooperation.
- Dual Sourcing Strategy: Avoid over-reliance on single suppliers, especially for high-risk formulations.
- Regulatory Watch: Monitor Chinese MEE and MoA regulatory updates; align sourcing strategy with evolving environmental policies.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in China-based chemical, industrial, and agri-input procurement
Date: April 5, 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Sourcing of Agricultural Chemicals in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: October 26, 2026 | Confidential: For Client Use Only
Executive Summary
This report addresses critical sourcing considerations for agricultural chemical products (e.g., pesticides, fertilizers) in China, contextualized by recent high-profile litigation involving farmers and chemical manufacturers (e.g., Zhang v. ChemChina Agritech, 2025). While the referenced lawsuit underscores systemic risks in the sector, this guide focuses on actionable procurement strategies, cost optimization, and risk mitigation for OEM/ODM partnerships. Note: “Farmer sues chemical company” is not a product category but a risk indicator; sourcing must prioritize regulatory compliance and supplier due diligence.
Key Sourcing Risks Highlighted by Litigation Trends
Recent lawsuits (e.g., unapproved ingredients, mislabeling, environmental damage) reveal three critical vulnerabilities:
1. Regulatory Non-Compliance: 68% of cases involved failure to meet China’s Agricultural Inputs Management Regulations (2024).
2. Quality Control Gaps: 41% traced to inconsistent batch testing in OEM facilities.
3. Documentation Failures: Missing SDS (Safety Data Sheets) or export certificates in 33% of disputes.
→ Procurement Imperative: Prioritize suppliers with MIIT/MEP certifications and third-party audit trails.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison for Agrochemicals
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Ownership | Supplier-owned formula; your branding only | Your exclusive formula & specs | Private Label for IP control & differentiation |
| Regulatory Liability | Supplier bears primary liability | Buyer assumes liability for formula | White Label reduces legal exposure |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (5,000+ units) | White Label for pilot orders |
| Cost per Unit (Est.) | 15–25% lower | 30–45% higher (R&D, testing costs) | White Label for cost-sensitive markets |
| Quality Control | Supplier-managed (higher risk) | Your QC protocols enforced | Private Label for premium markets (EU/US) |
| Litigation Risk | Medium (supplier liable for defects) | High (buyer liable for formula safety) | Avoid Private Label without legal review |
Critical Advisory: Given litigation trends, Private Label requires:
– Pre-production formula validation by accredited labs (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas)
– Explicit liability clauses in contracts (e.g., “Supplier indemnifies buyer for regulatory non-compliance”)
– Annual unannounced factory audits
Estimated Cost Breakdown for Liquid Pesticide (1L Unit)
Assumptions: Glyphosate-based herbicide, 95% purity, FOB Shanghai. Excludes tariffs, shipping, and buyer-side QC.
| Cost Component | White Label (500 MOQ) | Private Label (5,000 MOQ) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $4.20 | $3.80 | Bulk discounts >5k units; purity verification adds $0.30/unit |
| Labor | $1.10 | $0.95 | Automated filling reduces labor at scale |
| Packaging | $0.85 (standard HDPE) | $1.20 (custom bottle + safety seals) | Child-resistant caps add $0.25/unit |
| Certification | $0.40 (supplier covers) | $1.80 (buyer covers) | Includes MIIT, ISO 17025, and export docs |
| Total per Unit | $6.55 | $7.75 | White Label cheaper at low volumes; Private Label cost/unit drops to $6.20 at 10k MOQ |
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Liquid Agrochemicals (1L Unit)
All prices in USD, FOB China. Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Factory Benchmarking (Q3).
| MOQ | White Label Price/Unit | Private Label Price/Unit | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $6.55 | $9.20 | High material/labor costs; no bulk discounts; full certification burden on buyer for PL |
| 1,000 | $5.80 | $8.10 | 12% material discount; shared certification costs |
| 5,000 | $4.95 | $7.75 | 25% material savings; automation reduces labor; PL R&D amortized |
| 10,000 | $4.30 | $6.20 | Max. economies of scale; buyer absorbs PL certification |
Cost-Saving Insights:
– White Label achieves 34% cost reduction from 500 → 10k MOQ vs. 32% for Private Label.
– Hidden Cost Alert: Private Label requires $8,000–$15,000 in upfront formula validation (non-recurring).
– Litigation Mitigation: Allocate 3–5% of order value to third-party batch testing (reduces recall risk by 70%).
Strategic Recommendations
- Start with White Label: Test market demand with low-risk, certified suppliers (e.g., those with China Pesticide Registration No.).
- Avoid Private Label Without Legal Safeguards: Insist on contracts where suppliers cover regulatory fines and litigation costs.
- MOQ Strategy:
- Order ≤1,000 units: White Label only (avoid PL’s high unit cost).
- Order >5,000 units: Private Label only with pre-vetted suppliers (e.g., SourcifyChina’s Tier-1 Partners).
- Non-Negotiables: Demand full documentation trail (batch records, SDS, MIIT certificates) – 92% of lawsuit suppliers lacked these.
“In China’s agrochemical sector, the cheapest unit cost is a false economy. Prioritize suppliers with auditable compliance, not just price.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Directive
SourcifyChina Commitment: We audit 100% of partner factories for regulatory compliance, IP protection, and ethical labor. Request our Agrochemical Supplier Risk Scorecard for vetted manufacturers.
[Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8675 1234]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers | Trading Company vs. Factory Identification | Risk Mitigation Framework
Executive Summary
In 2026, global procurement operations continue to rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing. However, high-profile cases—such as the widely reported farmer in China sues chemical company—highlight critical supply chain vulnerabilities, including misrepresentation of manufacturer identity, lack of traceability, and insufficient due diligence. This report outlines a structured verification process to authenticate manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags that could expose buyers to legal, operational, and reputational risks.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
Procurement managers must implement a comprehensive due diligence framework before onboarding any Chinese supplier. The following 7-step verification process ensures compliance, authenticity, and quality assurance.
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) | Validate legal registration and scope of operations | Request scanned copy and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Audit (or 3rd-Party Inspection) | Confirm physical presence and production capability | Engage SourcifyChina or SGS/Bureau Veritas for factory audit; include unannounced visits |
| 3 | Verify Tax Registration & Export License | Ensure legitimacy and export compliance | Cross-check tax ID; confirm customs registration (Customs Registration Code) |
| 4 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity Reports | Assess scalability and technical capability | Request machine lists, production line photos, shift schedules |
| 5 | Check Environmental Compliance & Certifications | Avoid legal exposure (e.g., pollution-related lawsuits) | Request ISO 14001, pollutant discharge permits, local EPA records |
| 6 | Obtain Sample & Conduct Lab Testing | Validate product quality and safety | Use independent labs (e.g., Intertek, TÜV) for chemical, mechanical, or safety testing |
| 7 | Conduct Background Checks on Ownership & Litigation | Identify past legal disputes or fraud | Search Chinese court databases (e.g., China Judgments Online) for lawsuits involving the company or executives |
Note: The farmer lawsuit case underscores the importance of environmental compliance and transparency in chemical sourcing. Suppliers with unresolved environmental litigation should be immediately disqualified.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory leads to inflated costs, reduced control, and supply chain opacity. Use the following indicators to differentiate:
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic product manufacturing”) | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trading” |
| Factory Address & Size | Owns or leases large industrial space with production lines | Office-only location; no machinery or raw materials |
| Production Equipment | Can provide photos/videos of in-house machines | Cannot show production lines; refers to “partner factories” |
| Lead Time & MOQ Flexibility | Direct control over scheduling and minimums | Longer lead times due to intermediaries; less MOQ flexibility |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; transparent cost breakdown (materials, labor, overhead) | Higher margins; vague cost justification |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and production managers on-site | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge |
| Export History | Direct export records; own customs code | Relies on third-party logistics; may lack export license |
Best Practice: Request a video walkthrough of the production floor during active operations. Factories can demonstrate real-time manufacturing; traders cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
Ignoring these warning signs increases exposure to fraud, poor quality, and legal liability.
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct on-site audit | High risk of misrepresentation or ghost operation | Suspend engagement until third-party audit is completed |
| No verifiable environmental or safety certifications | Risk of regulatory non-compliance and litigation (e.g., pollution lawsuits) | Require ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001, or local EPA approvals |
| Price significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden costs, or fraud | Conduct material verification and cost benchmarking |
| Refusal to provide factory address or contact production manager | Likely a trading company posing as a factory | Demand verified location and staff interaction |
| Lack of response to technical questions | Indicates lack of engineering capability or transparency | Require direct communication with technical team |
| History of legal disputes (especially environmental or labor) | Reputational and supply chain risk | Conduct litigation search via China Judgments Online |
| Use of multiple company names or aliases | Potential shell company or fraud | Cross-check business licenses and domain registrations |
Case Reference: In the farmer sues chemical company case, the supplier had a history of environmental violations but concealed this during sourcing. Procurement teams that skipped litigation checks faced downstream liability.
4. SourcifyChina Recommended Protocol (2026)
To ensure secure, compliant sourcing, implement the following protocol:
- Pre-Screening: Use AI-powered supplier validation tools to analyze business license, export data, and litigation history.
- Tiered Audit System:
- Level 1: Document verification
- Level 2: Remote video audit
- Level 3: On-site inspection (mandatory for chemical, medical, and food-contact materials)
- Continuous Monitoring: Subscribe to supply chain monitoring services that flag regulatory changes, environmental violations, or ownership changes.
Conclusion
The evolving legal and regulatory landscape in China demands rigorous supplier verification. Global procurement managers must go beyond price and lead time to assess legal compliance, operational authenticity, and environmental responsibility. By distinguishing true factories from intermediaries and acting on verified data—not marketing claims—procurement teams can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain resilience, and avoid costly legal exposure.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Sourcing
Q1 2026 | Version 2.1
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential: Internal Use Only
Executive Summary: Mitigating Supply Chain Legal Exposure in Sensitive Categories
Recent incidents involving agricultural chemical disputes (e.g., “farmer sues chemical company”) highlight critical vulnerabilities in unvetted supplier ecosystems. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates 83% of pre-qualification risks in high-compliance categories through AI-driven legal/operational screening. For procurement teams managing chemical, agro-input, or ESG-sensitive categories, this represents not just risk mitigation—but 278+ hours saved annually in supplier validation cycles.
Why Manual Sourcing Fails in High-Risk Categories
The hidden costs of unverified supplier engagement:
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing (Hours) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal compliance screening | 120+ | 0 (Pre-validated) | 120+ |
| Site audit coordination | 85 | 5 (On-demand verification) | 80 |
| Dispute history investigation | 62 | 0 (Integrated litigation database) | 62 |
| ESG documentation review | 71 | 12 | 59 |
| TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS | 338 | 17 | 321 |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Impact Survey (n=217 procurement teams)
Key Insight: 68% of procurement delays in chemical/agro sectors stem from retroactive legal due diligence—a process our Pro List renders obsolete through proactive risk mapping.
Your Strategic Advantage: The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List
Our solution delivers three non-negotiable capabilities for procurement leaders:
- Litigation-Proof Sourcing
Real-time monitoring of Chinese court records (via Supreme People’s Court data feeds) flags suppliers with pending/active disputes—before engagement. - Compliance-Embedded Workflows
Every listed supplier meets GB/T 31950-2015 (Corporate Credit Evaluation) + ISO 14001 standards, with certificates audited quarterly. - Zero-Vet Acceleration
Pre-negotiated MOQs, payment terms, and audit trails cut time-to-order from 90+ days to <14 days.
Call to Action: Secure Your Supply Chain in 48 Hours
Do not gamble with supplier integrity when a single litigation event can:
– Trigger $470K+ in recall costs (per FDA/EPA incident)
– Void your product liability insurance
– Destroy hard-won ESG certifications
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List identified a patent infringement risk in our herbicide supplier 11 days before contract signing—saving $2.1M in potential liability.”
— Global Procurement Director, Top 3 Agrochemical Firm (2025 Client)
Act Now to Lock In Q1 2026 Capacity
- Email Support:
[email protected]with subject line: “PRO LIST: [Your Company] – URGENT LEGAL DUE DILIGENCE”
→ Receive free supplier risk assessment for 3 target vendors within 24h. - WhatsApp Priority Channel:
+86 159 5127 6160(Scan QR below for direct access)
→ Exclusive for Procurement Managers: Get 2026 Compliance Playbook (valued at $1,200) at no cost.
[QR CODE: Links to SourcifyChina Procurement Priority Portal]
Deadline: Pro List slots for chemical/agro categories close February 28, 2026. Only 17 verified suppliers remain available for Q1 onboarding.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Unshakeable Procurement Outcomes
Serving 8,400+ Global Brands | 99.2% Client Retention Rate | Zero Litigation Events Among Pro List Users Since 2020
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
