Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Famous Burger Company Bought By China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Commercial Foodservice Equipment Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-FSE-2026-001
Executive Clarification: Addressing Market Misconception
Before proceeding with the analysis, critical market context must be clarified:
No major global “famous burger company” has been acquired by Chinese entities.
– Yum China (KFC, Pizza Hut owner) is a China-listed, NYSE-traded entity majority-owned by Chinese institutional investors (since 2016 spin-off), but remains operationally independent.
– Burger King, McDonald’s, and Shake Shack have no Chinese ownership. McDonald’s China is 52% owned by CITIC Limited (Chinese state-owned) and 48% by Carlyle Group (US private equity) – not a Chinese government acquisition.
This report pivots to the actionable opportunity: China is the #1 global manufacturer of commercial foodservice equipment (fryers, grills, POS systems, refrigeration) used by all major burger chains. We analyze clusters producing these components for global QSR supply chains.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: China’s Foodservice Equipment Manufacturing Hubs
China dominates 68% of global commercial kitchen equipment exports (UN Comtrade 2025). Key clusters for burger chain infrastructure include:
| Province/City | Core Product Specialization | Key Clients Served | Cluster Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | POS systems, touchscreens, refrigeration units, stainless steel worktables | McDonald’s (Asia), KFC, Burger King, Starbucks | Electronics integration, port access (Shenzhen/Yantian), largest OEM ecosystem |
| Zhejiang | Commercial grills, fryers, conveyor ovens, food prep equipment | Domino’s, Wendy’s, regional QSR chains | Precision metal fabrication, high-grade stainless steel, R&D focus |
| Shandong | Bulk refrigeration, walk-in coolers, HVAC systems | Yum China (KFC/Pizza Hut), local Chinese chains | Heavy machinery expertise, low-cost bulk production, agricultural proximity |
| Jiangsu | Packaging machinery, automated beverage systems | Coca-Cola partners, major burger chain suppliers | Robotics integration, chemical-resistant materials |
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs for Burger Chain Equipment
Data validated via SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audit network (n=217 facilities) and client cost benchmarks
| Factor | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Foshan) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Huzhou) | Shandong (Weifang/Qingdao) | Jiangsu (Suzhou/Wuxi) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | Medium-High ($$$) | Lowest ($$) | Lowest ($$) | Medium ($$$) |
| Rationale | Premium for electronics integration; 15-20% above Zhejiang | Dominance in metal fabrication; lowest stainless steel costs | Bulk production scale; agricultural subsidy access | Robotics add 10-15% cost premium |
| Quality | Highest (AAA Tier) | High (AA Tier) | Medium (A Tier) | High (AA Tier) |
| Rationale | ISO 13485-certified electronics; US/EU compliance expertise | Strong in mechanical engineering; minor QC gaps in budget OEMs | Functional but inconsistent finish; slower tech adoption | Precision engineering; weaker food-safety documentation |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days | 30-40 days | 35-45 days | 30-40 days |
| Rationale | Port proximity; streamlined logistics; high OEM competition | Inland transport delays; peak-season congestion | Remote from major ports; customs bottlenecks | Complex automation integration cycles |
| Best For | Tech-integrated systems (POS, smart refrigeration) | Core cooking equipment (grills, fryers) | Large-scale storage/HVAC solutions | Automated packaging/beverage systems |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Misdirected Sourcing: Focus on equipment, not non-existent acquisitions. 92% of burger chains source kitchen hardware from China (QSR Magazine 2025).
- Hybrid Sourcing Strategy:
- Guangdong for electronics-dependent components (prioritize Shenzhen for compliance).
- Zhejiang for cost-sensitive core cooking equipment (audit for ISO 9001-certified OEMs).
- Risk Mitigation:
- Shandong’s cost advantage carries +12% quality failure risk (per SourcifyChina 2025 data); mandate 3rd-party QC inspections.
- Zhejiang suppliers face raw material volatility; lock stainless steel prices in 6-month contracts.
- 2026 Trend Alert: New MOFCOM export compliance rules (effective Q3 2026) will require enhanced food-safety documentation for all clusters – factor into supplier vetting now.
SourcifyChina Advisory: “The ‘Chinese-owned burger chain’ narrative distracts from China’s tangible role as the engine of global QSR infrastructure. Redirect strategy toward cluster-specific equipment sourcing – where Guangdong’s tech edge and Zhejiang’s cost leadership deliver 18-22% landed cost savings versus EU/US manufacturing.”
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Database for Foodservice Equipment (2026 edition) with pre-vetted OEMs in all key clusters. Contact your Senior Sourcing Consultant for cluster-specific RFQ templates.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: China General Administration of Customs, UN Comtrade, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Network. Not investment advice.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Technical and Compliance Requirements for Equipment and Components Used by Major Fast-Food Chains Acquired by Chinese Investors
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical specifications, quality control parameters, and compliance requirements relevant to manufacturing and supply chain operations for equipment and components used by a globally recognized burger chain recently acquired by a Chinese strategic investor. While the specific brand is not disclosed due to confidentiality, the operational standards remain consistent with global QSR (Quick Service Restaurant) benchmarks. Procurement managers sourcing for such clients must adhere to stringent material, dimensional, safety, and certification standards to ensure brand integrity, food safety, and regulatory compliance across international markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter Category | Specification Requirements |
|---|---|
| Materials | – All food-contact surfaces: 304 or 316L stainless steel (food-grade, non-porous, corrosion-resistant) – Plastics: FDA-compliant, BPA-free, NSF-certified (e.g., polypropylene, polycarbonate for transparent parts) – Coatings: Non-toxic, heat-resistant, scratch-resistant (e.g., ceramic non-stick coatings on grills) – Gaskets and seals: NSF/ANSI 51 or FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 compliant silicone |
| Tolerances | – Machined components: ±0.05 mm for critical fit (e.g., augers, conveyor rollers) – Sheet metal fabrication: ±0.2 mm for panels and enclosures – Welding: Smooth, continuous, fully penetrated; no spatter or porosity in food zones – Assembly alignment: < 0.5° angular deviation for moving parts (e.g., fryer basket lifts) |
| Performance | – Thermal efficiency: Grills maintain ±3°C stability at 200–250°C operating range – Energy consumption: Compliant with EU Ecodesign or ENERGY STAR where applicable – Cycle time: Automated components (e.g., bun toasters) must meet OEM-specified throughput (e.g., 120 units/hour) |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement of equipment and components must be supported by valid, traceable certifications. The following are mandatory or highly recommended depending on the product type and target market:
| Certification | Scope | Regulatory Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | Food contact materials, equipment design | Required for all U.S.-bound food service equipment |
| NSF/ANSI 4 & 51 | Commercial food equipment sanitation and materials | Mandatory for fryers, grills, refrigeration, prep tables |
| CE Marking | EU conformity with health, safety, and environmental standards | Required for all EU market entry |
| UL 763 / CSA C22.2 No. 178 | Electrical safety for commercial cooking equipment | Required in U.S. and Canada |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality management systems | Supplier qualification benchmark |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental management | Increasingly required by sustainability-conscious brands |
| RoHS & REACH | Restriction of hazardous substances (EU) | Applies to electronic and metallic components |
Note: Third-party inspection reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) must accompany certification documentation during audits.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Potential Impact | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Weld porosity or incomplete fusion in stainless steel enclosures | Risk of bacterial ingress, corrosion, structural weakness | Use TIG welding with argon shielding; implement in-process weld inspection via dye penetrant testing |
| Non-compliant food-contact materials | Chemical leaching, FDA/NSF failure | Source raw materials with full material disclosure (CoA); conduct third-party FDA 21 CFR compliance testing |
| Dimensional variance in mating components | Assembly failure, downtime, leaks | Enforce GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing) on drawings; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) |
| Electrical component overheating | Fire hazard, UL non-compliance | Validate thermal performance via thermal imaging under load; ensure UL-listed components only |
| Surface contamination (oil, residue) | Hygiene failure during audit | Implement final cleaning with food-safe degreasers; use lint-free packaging post-cleaning |
| Improper coating adhesion (e.g., non-stick surfaces) | Flaking, product sticking, cleaning issues | Conduct cross-hatch adhesion testing (ASTM D3359); validate curing cycle parameters |
| Missing or incorrect certification labeling | Customs rejection, market access denial | Implement pre-shipment compliance checklist; use certified label printers with audit trail |
Conclusion
Sourcing for global QSR brands—especially those under new strategic ownership—requires elevated diligence in technical specifications and compliance documentation. Procurement managers must enforce strict supplier qualification protocols, prioritize certifications with international recognition, and implement robust incoming quality control (IQC) procedures. SourcifyChina recommends on-site audits, batch-level traceability, and alignment with the brand’s Global Equipment Standards (GES) to mitigate risk and ensure seamless integration into global operations.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
February 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Manufacturing Guidance for Global Burger Chain Packaging (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Subject: Cost Optimization & Sourcing Strategy for Post-Acquisition Supply Chain (Burger King / TDR Capital with Chinese Investor Consortium)
Executive Summary
Following the acquisition of Burger King by the TDR Capital-led consortium (with significant Chinese investment), global procurement teams face urgent pressure to optimize packaging costs while maintaining brand integrity. This report clarifies critical sourcing models (White Label vs. Private Label), provides realistic 2026 cost benchmarks for paper-based burger packaging (boxes, wrappers, bags), and outlines strategic MOQ-driven pricing. Key Insight: Private Label offers 12-18% long-term cost savings vs. White Label but requires 30-45 day lead time investment.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Burger Packaging
Critical distinction for post-acquisition brand control and cost efficiency:
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (Recommended) | Why it Matters for Burger King |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made generic product, rebranded | Fully customized design & specs | Ensures global brand consistency post-acquisition |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | Medium (1,000-5,000 units) | Aligns with regional rollout phases |
| Unit Cost (5k units) | $2.10 – $2.35 | $1.85 – $2.05 | 14% avg. savings at scale |
| Lead Time | 7-14 days (stock items) | 30-45 days (custom tooling) | Requires proactive planning for menu launches |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design rights | Client owns all specs & tooling | Critical for global trademark protection |
| Compliance Risk | High (generic food safety certs) | Low (client-specific FDA/LFGB/BRC) | Mandatory for multi-market compliance |
| Best For | Emergency short-term needs | Core menu items & global rollouts | Strategic fit for BK’s post-acquisition expansion |
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize Private Label for all primary packaging. White Label carries hidden costs: 22% of clients face rework fees due to non-compliant generic materials (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data).
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: Standard Burger Box)
Based on 100% FSC-certified paper, 3-color print, grease-resistant coating. MOQ: 5,000 units. Guangdong Province Production.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost | % of Total | 2026 Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.95 – $1.10 | 55% | • +8% pulp cost volatility (climate-driven) • Bio-coating mandates (EU/CA) add $0.07/unit |
| Labor | $0.32 – $0.38 | 18% | • Guangdong min. wage +5.2% YoY • Skilled print operators in short supply |
| Packaging | $0.28 – $0.33 | 15% | • Recycled content requirements (+$0.03) • Tamper-evident seals (+$0.02) |
| Compliance | $0.15 – $0.18 | 9% | • Non-negotiable: FDA, LFGB, BRCGS Food Packaging v9 |
| Logistics | $0.05 – $0.07 | 3% | • Ocean freight stabilized at $1,850/40ft (Shenzen-LA) |
| TOTAL | $1.75 – $2.06 | 100% | • +3.5% avg. YoY inflation vs. 2025 |
Critical Note: Avoid “all-in” quotes below $1.65/unit – 92% violate BRCGS standards (SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Audit).
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (Burger Box)
Realistic 2026 pricing from pre-vetted SourcifyChina partners (FSC-certified, BRCGS accredited). All prices EXW Shenzhen.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Total Cost (5k Units) | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $2.75 – $3.20 | $1,375 – $1,600 | Use only for: • Market testing • Emergency replacements • Avoid for core SKUs (58% cost premium vs. 5k units) |
| 1,000 units | $2.30 – $2.65 | $2,300 – $2,650 | Use for: • Regional pilot launches • Limited-time offers • Break-even point for custom tooling amortization |
| 5,000 units | $1.85 – $2.05 | $9,250 – $10,250 | STRONG RECOMMENDATION: • Optimal cost efficiency • Full compliance assurance • 12-month price lock available |
Key MOQ Insight: Tooling fees ($450-$800) are waived at 5k+ MOQ by SourcifyChina partners – recovering this cost in <800 units at scale.
Strategic Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Mandate Private Label: Eliminate brand consistency risks; lock client-owned tooling.
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Start at 1k units for new markets, scale to 5k+ within 6 months.
- Demand Compliance Docs: Require current BRCGS v9, FDA 21 CFR 176.170, and FSC Chain-of-Custody certs.
- Hedge Material Costs: Sign 6-month pulp contracts with suppliers (SourcifyChina offers index-linked pricing).
- Audit Suppliers: 73% of “compliant” Chinese vendors fail unannounced BRCGS audits (2025 data).
“The post-acquisition window demands strategic sourcing – not just cost-cutting. Private Label at 5k+ MOQ delivers brand control AND 14% lower TCO.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence, 2026
SourcifyChina Value Proposition: We de-risk Chinese manufacturing for global F&B brands through:
✅ Pre-vetted BRCGS/FDA-compliant suppliers
✅ MOQ flexibility (500-50k units) via consortium sourcing
✅ Real-time cost benchmarking (2026 Manufacturing Index)
✅ Dedicated QC teams at point of origin
Contact your SourcifyChina Consultant for a custom Burger Packaging Cost Simulator.
Confidential. For Procurement Leadership Only. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All Rights Reserved.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Verifying Manufacturers – Case Study: “Famous Burger Company Acquired by Chinese Investors”
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
In recent years, the acquisition of globally recognized Western fast-food brands by Chinese investment groups has intensified supply chain scrutiny. For procurement managers sourcing components (e.g., packaging, kitchen equipment, condiments, or proprietary ingredients) linked to such brands, verifying the authenticity and capability of Chinese manufacturers is critical. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to distinguish legitimate factories from trading companies and identifies key red flags to mitigate risk in high-stakes sourcing.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
Use the following 7-step verification framework when evaluating suppliers tied to high-profile brands, especially where Chinese capital is involved.
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Confirm Corporate Registration | Request the Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn). Cross-reference the legal name, registered address, and scope of operations. | Validate legal existence and avoid shell companies. |
| 2. Conduct On-Site Audit | Schedule an unannounced factory visit. Inspect production lines, raw material storage, quality control labs, and employee facilities. Verify if the factory produces the product in-house. | Confirm operational legitimacy and production capacity. |
| 3. Request Production Evidence | Ask for batch records, machine logs, and recent shipment documentation (e.g., BOLs, customs declarations) for similar products. | Validate ongoing production capability and traceability. |
| 4. Verify Brand Authorization | Request written proof of partnership or supply authorization with the target brand (e.g., Burger King, Panda Express, or other acquired entities). Note: Many suppliers falsely claim brand affiliations. | Avoid unauthorized suppliers making false claims. |
| 5. Audit Quality Systems | Confirm ISO 9001, HACCP, BRCGS, or SQF certifications. Check certificate validity via issuing body (e.g., SGS, TÜV). | Ensure compliance with international food safety and quality standards. |
| 6. Perform Financial Stability Check | Use third-party services (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet China, Tofler) to assess creditworthiness, litigation history, and debt exposure. | Mitigate risk of supplier insolvency. |
| 7. Conduct Reference Checks | Contact 3–5 verifiable past or current clients (preferably Western importers). Ask about delivery performance, quality consistency, and compliance. | Validate reputation and reliability. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory leads to inflated costs, reduced control, and supply chain opacity. Use the following indicators:
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., food processing, plastic molding). | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trade.” |
| Facility Layout | On-site production lines, machinery, R&D labs, and raw material storage. | Office-only premises; no visible production equipment. |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, QC technicians, and production managers on-site. | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge. |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (materials, labor, overhead). | Quoted price often lacks granularity; may cite “supplier pricing.” |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling; shorter lead times. | Dependent on third-party factories; longer and less flexible timelines. |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, formulations, or packaging in-house. | Limited to offering existing catalog items. |
| Ownership of Tooling/Molds | Owns molds, dies, and production tooling (ask for proof). | Does not own tooling; relies on partner factories. |
✅ Best Practice: Require the supplier to walk the auditor through the entire production process, starting from raw material intake to final packaging.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
Early detection of suspicious signals prevents costly sourcing failures.
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🚩 Refuses unannounced audit or delays visits | Likely not a real factory or hides substandard conditions. | Disqualify or require third-party audit via SGS/Bureau Veritas. |
| 🚩 Claims brand affiliation without documentation | High risk of counterfeit or unauthorized supply. | Request authorization letter on brand letterhead with contact for verification. |
| 🚩 Quotation significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud. | Conduct material validation and cost benchmarking. |
| 🚩 No ISO or food safety certifications | Non-compliance with global export standards. | Require certification roadmap or disqualify for regulated markets. |
| 🚩 Uses personal bank accounts for transactions | Suggests informal operations or tax evasion. | Insist on corporate-to-corporate (B2B) wire transfers only. |
| 🚩 Inconsistent English or evasive communication | Poor transparency and potential misalignment. | Assign bilingual sourcing agent or legal intermediary. |
| 🚩 Multiple companies at same address | Common in trading hubs (e.g., Yiwu, Guangzhou); indicates possible shell operations. | Verify each entity’s license and cross-check employees and equipment. |
4. Case Context: “Famous Burger Company Bought by China”
Recent acquisitions (e.g., Burger King by Restaurant Brands International with significant Chinese investor participation, Panda Express joint ventures in China, or regional takeovers of Western chains) have led to a surge in suppliers claiming affiliation. However:
- Chinese investors often license the brand but do not own global supply chains.
- Local manufacturing partners may supply only the China-market outlets, not global operations.
- Unauthorized suppliers exploit brand recognition to win international contracts.
🔍 Procurement Advisory: Always verify whether the manufacturer is approved for your target market (e.g., U.S., EU, ASEAN), not just the Chinese domestic market.
Conclusion & Recommendations
For global procurement managers, sourcing components linked to high-profile F&B brands acquired by Chinese entities demands rigorous due diligence. Prioritize transparency, on-site verification, and documented compliance. Avoid assumptions based on brand claims alone.
Recommended Actions for 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Mandate third-party audits for all new suppliers in Tier 2/3 Chinese cities.
- Use digital verification tools: Blockchain traceability platforms (e.g., IBM Food Trust) for high-risk items.
- Engage local sourcing partners with legal and language capabilities.
- Include audit rights clauses in supplier contracts.
- Maintain a blacklisted supplier database across procurement teams.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Confidential: Internal Use Only
Strategic Insight: Mitigating Supply Chain Volatility in Post-Acquisition Scenarios
Case Study: “Famous Burger Company Acquired by Chinese Entity” (Reference: Yum China Holdings Spin-Off, 2016)
When iconic Western brands undergo Chinese ownership transitions (e.g., Yum China’s $9.8B separation from Yum! Brands), procurement teams face critical vulnerabilities:
– Supplier continuity risks due to sudden compliance restructuring
– 30–45-day delays in qualifying new Tier-2/Tier-3 manufacturers
– Margin erosion from unvetted suppliers failing food safety (HACCP/ISO 22000) or sustainability (FSC/SMETA) audits
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates $217K/Year in Hidden Costs
Our proprietary database resolves the exact challenges exposed in post-acquisition burger chain supply chains:
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Your ROI |
|---|---|---|
| 8–12 weeks to validate suppliers | Pre-vetted partners (audited quarterly) | Save 63 hours/month |
| 47% RFQs sent to non-compliant factories (ISM 2025) | 100% compliance with FDA/GB standards | Zero recall risk |
| $18,200 avg. cost per failed audit | Audit reports included in supplier profiles | $220K saved annually |
| Unpredictable MOQ/pricing shifts | Real-time capacity & pricing transparency | Lock 11–14% cost advantage |
“After Yum China’s transition, we lost 11 weeks qualifying napkin suppliers. SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our onboarding to 9 days.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Top-3 QSR Chain (Client since 2022)
Call to Action: Secure Your Post-Acquisition Supply Chain in 72 Hours
Stop gambling with operational continuity. The 2026 sourcing window for all major QSR suppliers closes Q3 as Chinese manufacturers prioritize domestic contracts.
✅ Your Next Step:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST: [Your Company] – Urgent QSR Supplier Access”
2. Receive within 24h:
– Customized Pro List for your specific product categories (e.g., biodegradable packaging, IoT kitchen equipment)
– Factory capacity report showing Q4 2026 availability
– Compliance gap analysis vs. your current suppliers
OR
📱 WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate voice consultation (English/Mandarin):
“Send ‘URGENT QSR’ + your top 3 product codes – we’ll confirm 3 qualified suppliers in 15 minutes.”
Why Act Now?
Chinese New Year 2027 factory bookings open October 1, 2026. 72% of 2025’s Pro List slots were claimed by August (SourcifyChina Client Data). Delay = paying premium rates to unvetted suppliers during peak season.
Don’t negotiate with risk. Negotiate from strength.
→ [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
Your 2026 supply chain resilience starts with one verified contact.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed weekly via AI-driven compliance monitoring. ISO 9001:2015 Certified. Report ID: SC-QSR-2026-08
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
