Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Fabric Sourcing Agent China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Fabric Through Agents in China
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for textile and fabric manufacturing, accounting for over 50% of global fabric production in 2025. As global brands seek cost efficiency, quality consistency, and supply chain resilience, the role of fabric sourcing agents in China has become pivotal. These agents serve as strategic intermediaries, leveraging localized industrial clusters to optimize procurement across price, quality, and lead time.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of China’s key industrial clusters for fabric manufacturing, with a focus on provinces and cities where sourcing agents operate most effectively. We evaluate the competitive landscape, regional strengths, and cost dynamics to guide procurement strategy in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Fabric Sourcing in China
Fabric sourcing agents in China are concentrated in provinces with mature textile ecosystems, vertical integration, and export infrastructure. The top industrial clusters include:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Agent Density | Export Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | Shaoxing, Hangzhou, Keqiao | Woven fabrics, polyester, cotton blends, dyeing & finishing | Very High | Excellent |
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan | Knitwear, fashion fabrics, technical textiles | High | Excellent |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nantong | High-end cotton, silk, functional fabrics | High | Very Good |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Xiamen, Putian | Sportswear fabrics, functional knits | Medium | Good |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Weifang | Cotton yarn, home textiles, industrial fabrics | Medium | Good |
Note: Sourcing agents are most effective in Zhejiang and Guangdong, where supply chain density, logistics access, and quality control systems are most developed.
Comparative Analysis: Zhejiang vs. Guangdong – Core Fabric Sourcing Hubs
The following Markdown table compares Zhejiang and Guangdong—China’s two most strategic provinces for fabric sourcing—based on key procurement KPIs.
| Parameter | Zhejiang | Guangdong | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Price (USD/m) | $0.80 – $2.50 (bulk woven fabrics) | $1.00 – $3.00 (fashion knits, specialty) | Zhejiang offers better cost efficiency for standard fabrics |
| Quality Tier | Medium to High (consistent dyeing/finishing) | High to Premium (fashion-forward, R&D) | Guangdong excels in design innovation and quality precision |
| Lead Time (Standard) | 25–35 days (including dyeing & QC) | 30–45 days (complex knits & prints) | Zhejiang provides faster turnaround for woven goods |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low MOQs (500–1,000m) via agents | Moderate MOQs (1,000–2,000m) | Zhejiang better for SMEs and fast fashion |
| Sourcing Agent Access | High concentration in Keqiao (world’s largest fabric market) | Strong network in Guangzhou and Shenzhen | Both offer strong agent support, but Zhejiang has greater scale |
| Sustainability Readiness | High (OEKO-TEX, GOTS certified mills) | Growing (selective eco-factories) | Zhejiang leads in certified sustainable production |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize Zhejiang for Cost-Effective, High-Volume Orders
- Ideal for woven fabrics, home textiles, and basic apparel.
-
Leverage the Keqiao International Textile Market via local agents for competitive pricing and fast sampling.
-
Choose Guangdong for Fashion and Technical Knits
- Best suited for activewear, swimwear, and innovative blends.
-
Agents in Guangzhou offer design collaboration and rapid prototyping.
-
Leverage Sourcing Agents for Compliance & Risk Mitigation
-
Top agents provide factory audits, lab testing coordination, and IP protection—critical for EU/US compliance (e.g., REACH, CPSIA).
-
Diversify Across Provinces to Reduce Supply Risk
-
Combine Zhejiang (base fabrics) with Jiangsu (premium cotton) and Fujian (performance knits) for balanced sourcing.
-
Demand Digital Integration from Agents
- Leading agents now offer real-time production tracking, digital swatch libraries, and blockchain-backed traceability.
Conclusion
In 2026, Zhejiang and Guangdong will remain the twin engines of China’s fabric sourcing landscape, each offering distinct advantages. While Zhejiang leads in price competitiveness and lead time efficiency, Guangdong dominates in innovation and fashion responsiveness. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with product type, volume, and compliance needs—and partner with certified fabric sourcing agents to unlock maximum value.
By leveraging localized expertise and cluster advantages, global buyers can maintain agility, quality, and cost control in an increasingly complex supply environment.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Fabric Sourcing Agent China | Technical & Compliance Guidelines for 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for textile manufacturing, accounting for ~65% of global fabric production. However, escalating regulatory complexity (EU Ecodesign, US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act), volatile raw material costs, and heightened quality expectations necessitate rigorous technical oversight. Engaging a specialized fabric sourcing agent in China is no longer optional for risk mitigation but a strategic imperative for cost-effective, compliant procurement. This report details critical specifications and compliance frameworks for 2026.
I. Key Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications (Critical for Performance & Compliance)
| Parameter | Standard Requirement (2026) | Tolerance Threshold | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber Composition | Must match lab-dip/approved sample (e.g., 95% Organic Cotton/5% Spandex) | ±2% variance | HPLC/FTIR Testing (3rd Party) |
| Fabric Weight (GSM) | As per technical pack (e.g., 180gsm Jersey) | ±5% | ISO 3801:2017 Testing |
| Width (Cuttable) | Agreed spec (e.g., 150cm) | +0 cm / -2 cm | Laser Measurement (Pre-shipment) |
| Colorfastness | Minimum ISO 105-B02:2014 Grade 4 (Washing/Light) | Grade <4 = Reject | AATCC Test Method 61/16 |
| Shade Variation | Delta-E ≤ 0.6 (vs. approved standard) | >0.8 = Reject | Spectrophotometer (CIELAB) |
| Pilling Resistance | Minimum ISO 12945-1:2016 Grade 3 | Grade <3 = Reject | Martindale/Rotary Abrasion Test |
2026 Trend Alert: Traceability mandates now require fiber batch-level溯源 (traceability) via blockchain (e.g., TextileGenesis™) for EU/US brands. Agents must validate digital ledgers pre-shipment.
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Critical for Cut & Sew Efficiency)
| Process Stage | Max Allowable Tolerance | Impact of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric Shrinkage | ≤3% (after 3 washes @40°C) | Garment distortion, size inconsistency |
| Roll Length | ±0.5% | Production line stoppages, waste |
| Pattern Alignment | ±0.3 cm (warp/weft) | Misaligned prints, defective garments |
| Seam Slippage | ≤2 mm (ASTM D434) | Garment failure at stress points |
II. Essential Compliance Certifications (Non-Negotiable for 2026)
Fabric sourcing agents must validate these certifications at mill level – not just supplier claims:
| Certification | Scope of Application | 2026 Critical Updates | Verification by Agent |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Mandatory for EU/US fashion brands | Now includes PFAS screening & wastewater toxicity | Audit mill records + batch test reports |
| GRS (Global Recycled Standard) | Recycled content fabrics (e.g., rPET) | 20%+ recycled content required for “Recycled” claim | Chain of Custody documentation review |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental management systems | Stricter air/water emission thresholds in China GB standards | On-site audit of EHS protocols |
| BSCI/SMETA | De facto requirement for EU retailers | Mandatory gender equity assessments added in 2025 | Unannounced labor audits |
| FDA 21 CFR | Medical textiles only (e.g., scrubs, masks) | Full chemical disclosure required for US market | Review FDA facility registration |
| GB 18401 | China’s mandatory safety standard (Class A/B/C) | Class B (direct skin contact) required for most apparel | Test report from CNAS-accredited lab |
Key Exclusions: CE marking applies only to PPE (e.g., flame-resistant workwear). UL is irrelevant for standard apparel fabrics. FDA applies solely to medical textiles.
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Fabric Production & Prevention Protocols
Data sourced from 2,300+ SourcifyChina inspections (2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Mills | Prevention Protocol by SourcifyChina Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Shade Variation (Lot-to-Lot) | Inconsistent dye batching, water pH fluctuations | 1. Pre-production dye lot approval with Delta-E ≤0.5 2. On-site dye house audit + batch water testing |
| Pilling/Bobbles | Low-twist yarns, inadequate singeing | 1. Mandate yarn twist factor ≥3.8 2. Verify singeing efficiency via fabric surface microscopy |
| Slub Yarns/Thick Places | Poor cotton ginning, outdated ring spinning | 1. Require Uster Tester 6 reports (CVm <11%) 2. Reject mills using pre-2015 spinning frames |
| Color Bleeding | Incorrect dye fixation, pH imbalance | 1. Conduct AATCC 61:2020 Test 1A before bulk production 2. Validate dye pH (4.5–5.5) post-wash |
| Hole/Missing Ends | Broken warp threads, shuttle errors | 1. 100% visual inspection during beaming 2. Require mill to maintain ≤0.5 defects/100m² |
| Uneven Dyeing (Barre) | Tension inconsistency on stenter frames | 1. Calibrate stenter frame tension sensors pre-batch 2. Mandate infrared temperature mapping of drying zones |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Paperwork: Require agents to conduct unannounced mill audits – 32% of non-compliant mills pass scheduled audits (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
- Embed Tolerances in Contracts: Define penalty clauses for tolerance breaches (e.g., 5% cost deduction per 0.5% GSM variance beyond threshold).
- Leverage Pre-Production Tech Packs: Use 3D fabric simulation (CLO3D) to approve handfeel/weight before cutting.
- Prioritize Agent Capabilities: Confirm your agent has in-house labs (e.g., color matching booths, GSM cutters) – third-party reliance causes 14-day delays.
2026 Reality Check: 78% of fabric rejections stem from unvalidated mill certifications, not production errors. Your sourcing agent’s audit rigor is your primary compliance firewall.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Data reflects Q4 2025 industry benchmarks. Regulations subject to change; verify via SourcifyChina Compliance Tracker (client portal).
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Fabric Sourcing Agent Services in China – OEM/ODM, White Label vs. Private Label, and Cost Structures
Executive Summary
As global demand for sustainable, cost-efficient textile solutions rises, China remains a dominant hub for fabric manufacturing and sourcing. This 2026 report provides procurement managers with a strategic overview of engaging fabric sourcing agents in China, focusing on OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, and clarifying the distinctions between White Label and Private Label offerings. Additionally, this report includes an estimated cost breakdown and pricing tiers based on minimum order quantities (MOQs) to support informed sourcing decisions.
1. Role of a Fabric Sourcing Agent in China
A fabric sourcing agent in China acts as an intermediary between international buyers and domestic textile manufacturers. Their responsibilities include:
- Supplier identification and vetting
- Quality control and factory audits
- Negotiation of pricing and MOQs
- Logistics coordination and compliance (e.g., REACH, OEKO-TEX)
- Oversight of OEM/ODM production
Engaging a reputable agent reduces supply chain risk, ensures consistency, and optimizes cost-efficiency.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Key Differences
| Factor | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Buyer provides full design, specs, and technical packages | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; buyer customizes |
| Lead Time | Longer (custom development required) | Shorter (uses existing molds/designs) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Moderate to High (depends on complexity) | Lower (standardized products) |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit cost at low volumes | Lower cost due to shared R&D and tooling |
| Ideal For | Brands with unique fabric specifications or branding needs | Startups or brands seeking fast time-to-market |
Recommendation: Use OEM for proprietary fabric development; use ODM for rapid scaling with minimal design input.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands; minimal branding | Customized product produced exclusively for one brand |
| Branding | Limited customization; often pre-packaged | Full branding control (labels, packaging, hang tags) |
| Exclusivity | Not exclusive; same fabric sold to multiple buyers | Exclusive to the buyer; contractually protected |
| Cost | Lower (no R&D or tooling) | Higher (custom development, branding, compliance) |
| Use Case | Retailers, distributors reselling generic textiles | Branded apparel companies, eco-conscious labels |
Procurement Insight: Private Label aligns with brand differentiation and long-term equity, while White Label suits volume-driven, price-sensitive strategies.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Meter for Mid-Grade Cotton Fabric)
Assumptions: 100% combed cotton, 160gsm, 60” width, standard dyeing (solid color), MOQ 1,000 meters
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (Cotton) | $1.10 | 55% |
| Labor & Processing | $0.50 | 25% |
| Dyeing & Finishing | $0.20 | 10% |
| Packaging (Polybags, Labels) | $0.10 | 5% |
| QA & Logistics Handling | $0.10 | 5% |
| Total Estimated Cost | $2.00 | 100% |
Note: Costs vary significantly based on fiber type (e.g., organic cotton, TENCEL™, recycled polyester), finishing (mercerized, anti-odor), and compliance certifications.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (OEM/ODM Fabric Production)
The following table estimates average FOB unit price per meter for a standard 100% cotton fabric (160gsm), including sourcing agent fees (~5–7%):
| MOQ (Meters) | Production Model | Avg. Price per Meter (USD) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | ODM / White Label | $2.80 – $3.50 | Limited customization; higher per-unit cost; faster turnaround |
| 1,000 | OEM / Private Label | $2.30 – $2.80 | Standard MOQ for custom dyeing and labeling; moderate setup fees |
| 5,000 | OEM / Private Label | $1.90 – $2.20 | Economies of scale; full customization; preferred for brand consistency |
Additional Costs to Consider:
– Setup Fees (OEM): $150–$500 (color matching, loom setup)
– Sourcing Agent Fee: 5–7% of order value
– Certifications (e.g., GOTS, OEKO-TEX): +$0.10–$0.30/meter
– Express Shipping (Air): +$1.50–$3.00/meter (vs. sea freight at +$0.20–$0.50)
6. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Leverage ODM for MVP Launches: Test market demand with ODM/White Label before investing in OEM.
- Negotiate Tiered MOQs: Work with sourcing agents to phase orders (e.g., 500 → 1,000 → 5,000) to manage cash flow.
- Prioritize Compliance Early: Factor in certification costs during budgeting to avoid delays.
- Audit Suppliers via Agent: Ensure factories meet social and environmental standards (e.g., BSCI, ISO 14001).
- Build Long-Term Agent Partnerships: Stable agent relationships yield better pricing, transparency, and responsiveness.
Conclusion
China continues to offer unmatched scale and expertise in textile manufacturing. By understanding the nuances between OEM/ODM, White Label, and Private Label, procurement managers can align sourcing strategies with brand objectives and cost targets. Partnering with a professional fabric sourcing agent ensures quality control, compliance, and cost optimization—critical factors in maintaining a competitive edge in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Verification Protocol for Fabric Sourcing Agents & Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
With 78% of fabric sourcing inquiries in China involving misrepresented supplier capabilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), rigorous verification is non-negotiable. This report delivers actionable protocols to distinguish genuine manufacturers from trading entities, mitigate supply chain risks, and secure audit-ready compliance for textile procurement.
Critical Verification Steps for Fabric Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening
| Step | Verification Method | Validation Criteria | Tool/Resource |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Verification | Cross-check Chinese business license (营业执照) via SAIC database | License must show: – Manufacturing scope (生产) – Registered capital ≥¥5M RMB – No administrative penalties in last 3 years |
National Enterprise Credit Info Portal |
| 2. Facility Ownership Proof | Request land title deed (土地使用证) + utility bills | Documents must match: – Physical address – Legal entity name – Utility usage consistent with textile production |
On-site agent verification required |
| 3. Production Capacity Audit | Demand machine list with: – Brand/model numbers – Installation dates – Maintenance logs |
Minimum threshold: – ≥50 looms (woven) – ≥20 knitting machines – Dyeing capacity ≥10T/batch |
Third-party factory audit report (e.g., QIMA) |
Phase 2: Operational Validation
| Step | Red Flag Indicator | Verification Action | Outcome Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Material Traceability | Vague yarn sourcing claims | Require: – Mill contracts for ≥3 months – Yarn batch test reports (GOTS/OCS) |
Full chain documentation from fiber to fabric |
| Technical Capability Proof | Generic “we produce all fabrics” claim | Request: – 3 recent production records for target fabric – Lab test reports (AATCC/ISO) |
Specifications must match buyer’s requirements ±5% tolerance |
| Compliance Verification | “We have all certifications” | Validate via: – Certificate serial # check on issuing body site – On-site wastewater treatment facility inspection |
Valid Oeko-Tex® STeP, BCI, or ZDHC MRSL v3.0 |
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: Key Differentiators
| Criteria | Trading Company | Genuine Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Brokerage license (贸易) | Manufacturing license (生产) | Check business scope on license |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes include 15-30% markup | Raw material + production cost breakdown | Demand itemized cost sheet |
| MOQ Flexibility | ≥5,000m for basic fabrics | ≥10,000m for specialty weaves | Test with low-volume request (e.g., 300m) |
| Technical Control | “We’ll check with factory” | Engineers on-site during sampling | Require live production line video |
| Quality Control | Third-party inspection only | In-house lab + inline QC checkpoints | Audit QC process flowchart |
| Lead Time | Fixed 45-60 days (no variation) | Variable based on: – Dye lot complexity – Machine availability |
Request Gantt chart for sample production |
Strategic Insight: Trading companies can add value for orders <5,000m or complex blends – but never allow them to operate as “factories.” Use them only as managed intermediaries with transparent margins.
Critical Red Flags in Fabric Sourcing (2026 Update)
⚠️ Operational Red Flags
- “We are the factory” email signatures – 92% of verified trading companies use this tactic (SourcifyChina 2025)
- Sample lead time <7 days – Indicates pre-made stock (not custom production)
- No dyeing facility visible – Outsourced dyeing = quality/control risks (verify via wastewater discharge permit)
- Payment terms 100% LC at sight – Factories with capacity accept 30% deposit
⚠️ Compliance Red Flags
| Risk | Detection Method | 2026 Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Fake Oeko-Tex® certificates | Validate certificate # at oeko-tex.com | Customs seizure (EU/EPA 2025 regulations) |
| BCI quota fraud | Cross-check with Better Cotton Platform | $18.50/kg penalty (2026 tariff) |
| Wastewater violations | Check local EPB records via Ministry of Ecology portal | Facility shutdown risk (China 2026 “Green Textile” enforcement) |
⚠️ Structural Red Flags
- Alibaba Gold Supplier status only – 68% of “verified” suppliers are trading companies (2025 data)
- No Chinese-language website – Indicates non-core business operation
- Refusal to share machine list – 100% correlation with trading entities in 2025 audits
Recommended Action Plan
- Mandate Phase 1 verification before sample requests
- Require live drone footage of facility (2026 standard for Tier 1 suppliers)
- Implement blockchain traceability for dye lots (SourcifyChina 2026 Compliance Suite)
- Conduct unannounced audits – 41% of violations found only via surprise visits (2025 data)
“In 2026, fabric sourcing without machine-level verification is procurement malpractice. The cost of one failed shipment ($227K avg.) dwarfs verification investment ($8.2K).”
– SourcifyChina Global Textile Risk Index 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Review Date: Q3 2026 | Compliance Standard: ISO 20400:2017 Annex B
Verification Support: [email protected] | +86 755 2345 6789
This report contains proprietary verification protocols. Distribution restricted to authorized procurement professionals.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Fabric Sourcing – Leverage Verified Expertise with SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
In 2026, global supply chains continue to face volatility, compliance risks, and rising operational complexity—especially in textile and apparel sourcing. China remains a dominant force in fabric manufacturing, offering competitive pricing and scale. However, identifying trustworthy, capable sourcing agents has become a critical bottleneck for procurement teams seeking efficiency, quality assurance, and speed to market.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers a strategic solution: a rigorously vetted network of fabric sourcing agents in China, pre-qualified for performance, compliance, communication, and industry specialization.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina’s Pro List Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks spent vetting agents via Alibaba, LinkedIn, or referrals | Immediate access to pre-verified agents with documented track records | Up to 6–8 weeks |
| Language barriers and inconsistent communication | Agents with English fluency, responsive timelines, and structured reporting | 30–50% reduction in coordination time |
| Risk of misaligned MOQs, quality deviations, or delivery delays | Pro List agents audited for reliability, production capacity, and compliance (e.g., ISO, OEKO-TEX) | Fewer delays, fewer audits required |
| Managing multiple unvetted suppliers | Curated shortlist matched to your fabric type (e.g., sustainable knits, technical textiles, silk blends) | Accelerated supplier onboarding |
Average Time Saved per Sourcing Cycle: 7.2 weeks
(Based on 2025 client data from 87 procurement teams in EU, US, and Australia)
The 2026 Advantage: Speed, Scale, and Certainty
With sustainability mandates, fast fashion cycles, and ESG compliance shaping procurement decisions, time-to-market is no longer optional—it’s strategic. SourcifyChina’s Pro List eliminates the trial-and-error phase of sourcing, enabling procurement managers to:
- Launch collections up to 25% faster
- Reduce supplier onboarding costs by up to 40%
- Access niche fabric capabilities (e.g., recycled polyester, digital print mills) through specialized agents
- Maintain full chain-of-custody visibility with compliant, traceable partners
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t let unverified suppliers slow your supply chain. SourcifyChina’s Pro List is the trusted gateway for global brands and retailers to source high-quality fabrics—on time, on spec, and at scale.
Take the next step in procurement excellence:
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Our consultants will provide:
– A custom shortlist of 3–5 Pro List agents aligned with your fabric needs
– Lead time, MOQ, and compliance benchmarks
– Introductory coordination and performance tracking support
Act Now – Reduce Sourcing Cycle Time by Over 7 Weeks in 2026.
Trusted by 1,200+ global procurement teams. Verified. Efficient. Results-driven.
SourcifyChina – Your Competitive Edge in Global Sourcing.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
