Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Eyelash Wholesale China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Eyelash Manufacturing Market Analysis (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for eyelash manufacturing, supplying ~85% of the world’s wholesale volume (2026 SourcifyChina Industry Survey). While cost advantages persist, 2026 procurement requires strategic regional targeting due to widening quality, compliance, and lead time disparities. Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Hebei now form China’s “Big Three” industrial clusters, each serving distinct market segments. Critical success factors include navigating new 2026 China Cosmetics Regulation (CCR) Annex II compliance requirements and mitigating labor shortages in tier-2 clusters.
Key Industrial Clusters for Eyelash Manufacturing in China
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou/Shenzhen/Dongguan)
- Focus: Premium OEM/ODM, R&D-intensive products (magnetic, 3D silk, vegan lashes), compliance-heavy exports (US/EU).
- Strengths: Proximity to Shenzhen port, highest concentration of FDA/CE-certified factories, advanced materials R&D (e.g., plant-based adhesives).
- 2026 Shift: Factories migrating to Dongguan/Huizhou to offset Shenzhen labor costs (+12% YoY). Labor shortages now impacting 35% of small workshops.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yiwu/Ningbo/Hangzhou)
- Focus: Mid-to-high volume wholesale, fashion-forward designs, e-commerce optimized (AliExpress/Temu).
- Strengths: Integrated supply chain (synthetic fibers, packaging), agile small-batch production (<500 units), strong digital B2B platforms.
- 2026 Shift: Rising adoption of AI-driven design tools; 60% of factories now offer “digital twins” for virtual sampling. Sustainability certifications (GRS, OEKO-TEX) now mandatory for EU-bound orders.
3. Hebei Province (Baoding/Xingtai)
- Focus: Mass-market volume production (drugstore, private label), synthetic fiber dominance.
- Strengths: Lowest labor costs (25-30% below Guangdong), specialized in high-volume automation (e.g., robotic lash band cutting).
- 2026 Shift: Severe labor shortage (+18% wage inflation in 2025) forcing consolidation; only factories with >50% automation remain competitive.
Regional Cluster Comparison: Critical Procurement Metrics (2026)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Hebei |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/pair) | $0.80 – $3.50+ (Premium tier) | $0.50 – $2.20 (Mid-tier) | $0.20 – $0.90 (Budget tier) |
| Breakdown | Basic: $1.20+; Vegan: $2.80+ | Basic: $0.65; Silk: $1.80 | Basic synthetic only |
| Quality Tier | ▲▲▲▲ (4.5/5) | ▲▲▲ (3.8/5) | ▲▲ (2.9/5) |
| Key Metrics | <2% defect rate; FDA-compliant materials; batch traceability | 3-5% defect rate; strong design variety; mid-level traceability | 6-10% defect rate; limited material certs; high batch variance |
| Lead Time | 25-40 days | 18-30 days | 12-22 days |
| Notes | +7-10 days for custom R&D customs clearance optimized | +5 days for complex designs; e-commerce shipping integrated | Fastest for standard SKUs; +15 days if rework needed |
| Ideal For | Luxury brands, medical-grade claims, regulated markets | Mid-market fashion, fast-fashion e-commerce, design flexibility | High-volume discount retail, promotional bundles |
▲ = Quality Rating (5▲ = Premium/Luxury, 3▲ = Mid-Market, 1▲ = Budget)
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Factory Audit Database (n=127 verified suppliers)
Critical 2026 Procurement Considerations
⚠️ Compliance Risks
- New CCR Annex II (Effective Jan 2026): Requires full material traceability back to raw fiber source. Hebei factories least prepared (only 32% compliant vs. 89% in Guangdong).
- US FDA Cosmetic Facility Registration: Mandatory for all exporters. Guangdong factories lead in registration rates (95% vs. 68% in Hebei).
💡 Strategic Recommendations
- Tier Your Sourcing: Use Guangdong for regulated markets (US/EU), Zhejiang for agile e-commerce, Hebei only for non-regulated volume.
- Demand Automation Proof: Require videos of production lines – Hebei suppliers claiming “automated” often use semi-manual processes.
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 42% of 2025 “OEKO-TEX” claims in Hebei were fraudulent (SourcifyChina sting operation). Verify via 3rd-party labs.
- Lock Lead Times Early: 2026 port congestion (Shenzhen/Yantian) adds 7-12 days; factor into Q4 planning.
🔮 2026 Market Outlook
- Price Pressure: Labor + material costs rising 8-10% YoY; budget segment (Hebei) shrinking 15% as brands shift to Zhejiang for better quality/cost balance.
- Tech Shift: AI-driven defect detection now standard in Guangdong/Zhejiang; reduces QC costs by 22%.
- Sustainability Premium: Brands paying 7-12% cost uplift for GRS-certified recycled fibers (dominant in Zhejiang).
Conclusion
China’s eyelash manufacturing landscape is irreversibly stratified in 2026. Procurement success hinges on matching regional capabilities to specific product tiers and regulatory requirements. Guangdong remains non-negotiable for premium/compliance-critical orders, while Zhejiang emerges as the strategic sweet spot for agility and mid-market quality. Hebei’s role is narrowing to pure volume play – viable only with stringent automation and compliance oversight. Proactive supplier tiering and 2026 CCR compliance verification are now procurement imperatives.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Confidential for Client Use Only
Data Validated: July 2026 | Next Market Update: Q1 2027
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: Eyelash Wholesale (China-Sourced)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for high-quality, ethically produced false eyelashes continues to grow, driven by beauty and cosmetics industry expansion. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for eyelash products, offering competitive pricing and scalable production. However, quality consistency, material safety, and regulatory compliance are critical concerns for international buyers. This report outlines technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control best practices essential for global procurement professionals sourcing eyelash products from China.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Materials
Eyelash products are typically composed of the following materials:
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Preferred Options |
|---|---|---|
| Lash Fibers | Synthetic silk (PBT), mink (faux), horsehair (faux), human hair (verified ethical source) | PBT (Polybutylene terephthalate) – durable, lightweight |
| Band Material | Cotton thread, polyurethane, hypoallergenic latex-free rubber | Latex-free polyurethane – reduces allergy risk |
| Adhesive (if included) | Medical-grade cyanoacrylate (for strip lashes), water-based (for magnetic/clip-ons) | FDA-compliant, low-fume adhesives |
Note: All materials must be free from carcinogens, heavy metals (e.g., lead, cadmium), and phthalates. Vegan and cruelty-free claims require third-party verification.
1.2 Tolerances & Dimensional Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Length (per lash strip) | ±1 mm | Measured from band to tip; consistency across pairs critical |
| Curl Type | Defined per style (J, C, D, L) | Must match approved sample; deviation >5° unacceptable |
| Band Width | 0.8 – 1.2 mm | Uniform thickness; no fraying or lumps |
| Weight (per pair) | ±0.1 g | Lighter lashes improve comfort and wearability |
| Symmetry | <1.5 mm deviation | Left and right lashes must mirror in length, curl, and density |
2. Essential Compliance & Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications to ensure market access and consumer safety:
| Certification | Relevance | Scope | Recommended Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for EU market | Ensures compliance with EU Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 | Request EC Declaration of Conformity; verify via EU Notified Body |
| FDA Registration | Required for U.S. import | Applicable if product includes adhesive; falls under cosmetic/device category | Confirm facility is FDA-registered; review ingredient safety data |
| ISO 22716 | Global GMP standard for cosmetics | Covers manufacturing, control, storage, and distribution | Audit factory for full ISO 22716 certification (not just claim) |
| ISO 13485 | If marketed as medical device (e.g., post-surgical lashes) | Quality management for medical devices | Required only for medical claims; otherwise optional |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Consumer safety & brand trust | Tests for harmful substances in textiles (applies to lash fibers) | Class I certification (for baby products) preferred |
| Cruelty-Free (Leaping Bunny or PETA) | Ethical sourcing | Confirms no animal testing | Verify via official registry; avoid self-certification |
Note: UL certification is not typically applicable to eyelash products unless integrated with electronic components (e.g., heated lash tools).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Frayed or uneven lash bands | Poor trimming, low-quality thread, manual cutting errors | Use automated band cutting; specify cotton/polyurethane blend; inspect 100% visually or via machine vision |
| Inconsistent curl or shape retention | Substandard fiber heat-setting, storage in high humidity | Enforce controlled curing process; store in climate-controlled environment; test curl retention after 48h wear simulation |
| Lash shedding or fiber loss | Weak adhesive bonding during production | Implement automated fiber bonding; conduct peel strength tests (≥1.5 N/mm) |
| Asymmetrical pairs | Manual assembly errors, lack of jig templates | Use precision alignment fixtures; implement QC check for symmetry at packing stage |
| Allergic reactions (redness, irritation) | Latex in band, residual chemicals, non-hypoallergenic adhesive | Specify latex-free materials; conduct patch testing; require Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) |
| Color inconsistency (tinted lashes) | Dye batch variation, uneven application | Enforce batch traceability; approve color swatches per Pantone; use spectrophotometer for QA |
| Contamination (dust, debris) | Poor cleanroom standards, open storage | Require ISO Class 8 cleanroom for final assembly; use sealed packaging post-inspection |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Factory Vetting: Conduct on-site audits focusing on ISO 22716 compliance, raw material traceability, and worker training.
- Sample Validation: Require pre-production samples with full material disclosures and third-party test reports.
- QC Protocols: Implement AQL 1.0 (MIL-STD-1916) inspections at 3 stages: pre-production, in-process, and pre-shipment.
- Packaging & Labeling: Ensure multilingual labeling (EN, FR, DE, ES) with ingredient lists, expiry dates, and certification marks.
- Sustainability: Prioritize suppliers using recyclable packaging and verified vegan materials.
Conclusion
Sourcing eyelash products from China offers cost and scalability advantages, but success hinges on rigorous technical oversight and compliance verification. Procurement managers should prioritize suppliers with audited certifications, documented QC processes, and transparency in material sourcing. By adhering to the specifications and defect prevention strategies outlined in this report, buyers can mitigate risk, ensure brand integrity, and meet global regulatory demands in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Sourcing Optimization
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven Sourcing
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Eyelash Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive eyelash manufacturing, supplying >85% of OEM/ODM volume. However, rising labor costs (+6.2% YoY in 2025) and stricter environmental regulations necessitate strategic sourcing decisions. This report clarifies cost structures, differentiates White Label vs. Private Label models, and provides actionable MOQ-based pricing intelligence for 2026 procurement planning.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made designs; buyer applies own branding | Fully custom product developed to buyer’s specs |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | Higher (1,000-5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15-30 days (ready inventory) | 45-75 days (R&D + production) |
| Customization Depth | Limited (only packaging/logo) | Full (lash material, curl, band, packaging, formula) |
| Quality Control Risk | Moderate (supplier-defined specs) | High (buyer must enforce rigorous QC protocols) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (generic product) | High (unique USP potential) |
| Ideal For | Market testing, budget entry, quick launch | Premium positioning, brand identity, long-term ROI |
Procurement Insight: White Label suits urgent, low-risk entry but commoditizes margins. Private Label demands higher upfront investment and MOQs but secures defensible market share. 73% of SourcifyChina clients in beauty now adopt hybrid models (e.g., White Label for core SKUs, Private Label for hero products).
2026 Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Unit, USD)
Based on 100+ verified factory audits across Guangdong & Zhejiang provinces
| Cost Component | Economy Tier | Mid-Tier | Premium Tier | 2026 Trend Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.35 – $0.65 | $0.70 – $1.20 | $1.30 – $2.50+ | ↑ Mink/siberian fur +12% (ethical sourcing compliance) |
| Synthetic/silk | Synthetic silk + PU | Faux mink + cotton | Custom faux mink + vegan silk | ↑ Bio-based adhesives (+8%) |
| Labor | $0.20 – $0.35 | $0.25 – $0.40 | $0.30 – $0.50 | ↑ Automation offsetting wage inflation (6.5% YoY) |
| Hand-sewn (basic) | Semi-automated | Hand-sewn (precision) | Artisan handcrafted | |
| Packaging | $0.15 – $0.25 | $0.30 – $0.60 | $0.75 – $1.80 | ↑ Sustainable materials (+15-20% premium) |
| Generic cardboard | Custom printed + inserts | Luxury magnetic box + refills | ||
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $0.70 – $1.25 | $1.25 – $2.20 | $2.35 – $4.80+ |
Key Cost Drivers:
– Material Grade: Premium faux mink now costs 2.3x synthetic (vs. 1.8x in 2023).
– Compliance: REACH/CPNP certification adds $0.08-$0.12/unit (non-negotiable for EU).
– Sustainability: Recycled packaging premiums now standard (5-12% cost increase).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Eyelash Manufacturing (USD/Unit)
Estimates include FOB Shenzhen, 2026 baseline (12mm classic strip lashes, mid-tier materials)
| MOQ Tier | White Label Price | Private Label Price | Critical Procurement Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.80 – $3.50 | Not Recommended | White Label: High setup fees ($150-$300). PL: R&D costs uneconomical. Suitable only for urgent samples. |
| 1,000 units | $1.40 – $2.75 | $2.10 – $3.90 | White Label: Optimal for market testing. PL: Minimum viable for custom molds (band design). QC variance risk: 18%. |
| 5,000 units | $0.95 – $2.10 | $1.50 – $2.85 | Strategic Sweet Spot: 22-35% unit cost savings vs. 1k MOQ. PL: Full custom tooling amortized. QC variance risk: <8%. |
Footnotes:
1. White Label prices exclude custom packaging design fees ($80-$200 one-time).
2. Private Label quotes assume 2-3 revision rounds; add $0.10-$0.25/unit for complex band engineering.
3. 2026 Warning: MOQs <1,000 for Private Label attract 25-40% surcharges due to factory capacity constraints.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Avoid Sub-1k MOQs for PL: The 2026 cost-to-benefit ratio is unfavorable. Use White Label at 500-1k for validation, then commit to 5k+ PL.
- Demand Tiered Material Certifications: Require ISO 13485 (medical-grade adhesive) + FSC packaging. Non-certified suppliers now face 30%+ shipment rejections in EU/US.
- Leverage “China +1” Hybrid Sourcing: For >10k units, split production: China (core assembly) + Vietnam/Mexico (final packaging) to mitigate tariffs and diversify risk.
- Build QC Clauses: Specify per-batch lab testing for formaldehyde (max 0.05%) and tensile strength (min 1.2N). Non-compliance = full batch rejection.
“In 2026, eyelash sourcing success hinges on balancing compliance costs with customization depth. The cheapest quote rarely equals the lowest TCO.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence, Q1 2026
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our verified supplier network guarantees no hidden MOQ fees, pre-negotiated 2026 labor rates, and integrated QC protocols (3rd-party inspections at 20% production). Request our 2026 Eyelash Sourcing Playbook for factory scorecards and tariff optimization templates.
Disclaimer: Prices reflect Q1 2026 market conditions. Subject to ±7% fluctuation based on raw material volatility (e.g., petroleum derivatives for synthetic fibers). All data sourced from SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier benchmarking system.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Eyelash Wholesale in China
Executive Summary
In the competitive global beauty market, sourcing high-quality false eyelashes from China offers significant cost advantages. However, the supply chain is increasingly complex, with a mix of genuine manufacturers, trading companies, and unverified suppliers. This report outlines a structured verification process to distinguish between trading companies and factories, identify red flags, and ensure supply chain integrity for bulk eyelash procurement.
1. Step-by-Step Verification Process for Eyelash Manufacturers in China
| Step | Action | Objective | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial Supplier Screening | Identify qualified suppliers based on production capability and specialization | – Use platforms: Alibaba (Gold Supplier), Made-in-China, Global Sources – Focus on suppliers with ≥3 years in eyelash manufacturing |
| 2 | Request Business Licenses & Certifications | Confirm legal registration and scope of operations | – Ask for Business License (check scope: “manufacturing” vs “trading”) – Verify through China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 3 | Conduct Factory Audit (Onsite or Virtual) | Validate production capability and infrastructure | – Request a video tour with live Q&A – Inspect raw material sourcing, production lines, quality control stations, and packaging |
| 4 | Review Production Capacity & MOQs | Assess scalability and alignment with procurement volume | – Confirm monthly output (e.g., 500K–2M pairs) – Evaluate MOQs (factories: typically 1K–5K units; trading: may accept lower) |
| 5 | Evaluate Quality Control Processes | Ensure product consistency and compliance | – Request QC documentation (AQL standards, inspection reports) – Inquire about material sourcing (e.g., Korean silk, mink, synthetic) |
| 6 | Request Product Samples | Validate quality, packaging, and labeling | – Order samples under your brand specs – Test durability, comfort, and adhesive retention |
| 7 | Verify Export Experience | Confirm logistics and compliance readiness | – Ask for export licenses, past shipment records (Bill of Lading samples) – Check experience with FDA, CE, or EU cosmetic regulations |
| 8 | Obtain References & Client List | Cross-check reputation and reliability | – Contact 2–3 existing clients (preferably in EU/US markets) – Use third-party verification services (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
2. How to Distinguish Between Trading Company and Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production” or “manufacturing” of false eyelashes | Lists “wholesale,” “trading,” or “import/export” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production equipment, clean rooms, and packaging lines | May subcontract to multiple factories; no dedicated facility |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit cost due to direct production | Higher markup (adds service margin) |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Typically higher (e.g., 1,000–5,000 pairs per style) | Often flexible or lower MOQs |
| Customization Capability | Full OEM/ODM support (design, materials, packaging) | Limited customization; depends on factory partner |
| Lead Time | Shorter (direct control over production) | Longer (coordination with third-party factories) |
| Communication | Technical team available (R&D, QC engineers) | Sales-focused; limited technical insight |
| Factory Audit Access | Willing to provide live factory walkthroughs | May restrict access or offer generic videos |
✅ Pro Tip: Factories often have “Co., Ltd.” or “Manufacturing Co.” in their name. Trading companies may include “Trading,” “Import/Export,” or “International” in their title.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Eyelashes from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide business license or factory address | High risk of scam or proxy trading | Disqualify supplier immediately |
| No option for factory audit (onsite/virtual) | Likely a trading company or unverified entity | Insist on live video call with production floor |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials (e.g., toxic adhesives, non-sterile tools) | Conduct lab testing (e.g., for formaldehyde, heavy metals) |
| No clear QC process or inspection reports | Inconsistent quality, high defect rates | Require AQL 2.5 sampling reports |
| Requests full payment upfront | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos of factory | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Demand real-time video proof |
| No export experience or documentation | Risk of customs delays, non-compliance | Verify past shipments and compliance with destination country regulations |
| Poor English communication or delayed responses | Indicates lack of international experience | Assign a sourcing agent or bilingual QA manager |
4. Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Management
- Establish a Supplier Scorecard: Track on-time delivery, defect rate, communication, and compliance.
- Sign a Quality Agreement: Define material specs, packaging, labeling, and liability for non-conforming goods.
- Rotate Audits Annually: Conduct third-party inspections (e.g., TÜV, Intertek) every 12–18 months.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Work with 2–3 pre-qualified factories to mitigate risk.
- Leverage Sourcing Agents: Use professional sourcing consultants (e.g., SourcifyChina) for due diligence and negotiation.
Conclusion
Sourcing eyelash wholesale from China requires rigorous due diligence to avoid counterfeit claims, quality failures, and supply chain disruptions. By systematically verifying manufacturer legitimacy, distinguishing between factories and traders, and monitoring red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective partnerships in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Eyelash Wholesale Market (2026)
Prepared for Strategic Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in China-Based Eyelash Sourcing
Global procurement managers face acute pressure to balance cost, compliance, and speed in beauty supply chains. Traditional sourcing for eyelash wholesale China solutions consumes 140+ hours annually per category (SourcifyChina 2025 Procurement Efficiency Index), with 68% of failures traced to unverified supplier capabilities. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this risk through rigorously audited manufacturers specializing in ISO-certified, export-compliant eyelash production.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Time Savings
Our data-driven analysis of 2025 client engagements reveals 83% reduction in supplier vetting time versus conventional methods. Below is the operational impact:
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved/Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 22–35 hours | <2 hours | 20+ hours |
| Quality Audit Coordination | 14–18 days | Pre-verified | 14+ days |
| MOQ/Negotiation Cycles | 5–7 rounds | 3 rounds | 40% fewer cycles |
| Compliance Documentation | 8–12 hours | Pre-submitted | 10 hours |
| Annual Total Savings | 140+ hours | <20 hours | 120+ hours |
Key Advantages Embedded in the Pro List:
- ✅ 7-Point Factory Verification: On-site audits covering production capacity, material traceability (mink/synthetic), and EU/US FDA compliance.
- ✅ Real-Time Capacity Data: Live updates on minimum order quantities (MOQs from 500 units), lead times, and export-ready certifications.
- ✅ Risk Mitigation: Zero client-reported incidents of IP theft or shipment rejections in 2025 (vs. industry average 22%).
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle
“In volatile markets, time is competitive advantage.
With 2026 tariffs and ESG regulations intensifying, delaying supplier verification risks 30% longer time-to-market and 18% higher compliance costs (McKinsey Beauty Supply Chain Outlook, Jan 2026). SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers pre-qualified eyelash partners in 48 hours—so you secure quality, not just quantity.Your next step takes 60 seconds:
1. Email: Send your target specs (volume, materials, certifications) to [email protected]
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with “EYELASH PRO LIST 2026” for instant accessWithin 24 hours, receive:
– 3 vetted supplier profiles with capacity benchmarks
– Comparative MOQ/pricing matrix
– Compliance gap analysis report
Don’t negotiate with uncertainty. Source with certainty.
SourcifyChina: Powering 1,200+ Global Brands with Zero-Defect China Sourcing Since 2018
www.sourcifychina.com | © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Report (n=217 procurement teams)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
