Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Eyelash Extensions Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Eyelash Extensions Wholesale Market Analysis (China)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
China dominates 72% of global eyelash extensions production (China Customs 2025), driven by vertically integrated supply chains, cost efficiency, and evolving technical expertise. While price remains competitive (avg. $0.80–$3.50/pair FOB), quality variance persists due to fragmented manufacturing. Strategic sourcing requires balancing regional strengths: Guangdong for premium quality/compliance, Zhejiang for volume/value, and emerging clusters in Jiangsu for innovation. Critical success factors include rigorous factory vetting, material traceability, and adherence to EU REACH/FDA standards.
Key Industrial Clusters for Eyelash Extensions Manufacturing
China’s production is concentrated in three coastal provinces with specialized ecosystems:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou | Premium mink/synthetic lashes; FDA/EU-compliant factories; R&D hubs | Shenzhen Port (fastest export); 15+ ISO 13485-certified facilities |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Hangzhou, Ningbo | Mass-produced synthetic lashes; budget/value segment; e-commerce integration | Yiwu International Trade City (largest small-commodity market); Alibaba HQ proximity |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing | Emerging high-tech lashes (magnetic, 3D silk); OEM innovation | Suzhou Industrial Park (tech-focused); proximity to Shanghai Port |
Cluster Insights:
– Guangdong supplies 65% of EU/US premium brands (requiring dermatological testing).
– Zhejiang accounts for 80% of Alibaba’s low-MOQ wholesale listings (MOQs from 50 pairs).
– Jiangsu is growing at 12% CAGR (2024–2026) in smart lash tech (e.g., heated applicators).
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs (2026 Projection)
Data validated via SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audit database (n=217) and forwarder partnerships.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Jiangsu |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB/pair) | $1.90–$3.50 (mink); $1.20–$2.10 (synthetic) | $0.80–$1.75 (synthetic); $1.50–$2.80 (mink) | $1.50–$3.00 (premium synthetics); $2.20–$4.00 (innovative) |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ (Consistent thickness, sterilized packaging; 95% pass rate on 3rd-party lab tests) | ★★☆☆☆ (High variance; 65% pass rate; common issues: glue residue, inconsistent curl) | ★★★★☆ (High innovation; 88% pass rate; emerging in silk/volume lashes) |
| Lead Time | 25–40 days (includes compliance docs) | 15–25 days (standard); +7 days for customizations | 20–35 days (R&D-dependent; +10–15 days for prototypes) |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (500–1,000 pairs; negotiable for certified factories) | Very High (50–500 pairs; Yiwu market favors small orders) | Medium (300–800 pairs; R&D costs limit micro-MOQs) |
| Key Risk | Higher cost pressure; quota competition for top-tier factories | Compliance gaps (27% of factories lack ISO 13485); quality inconsistency | Limited production scale; nascent supplier ecosystem |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Premium/Regulated Markets (EU/US): Prioritize Guangdong. Budget for 15–20% higher FOB but mitigate recalls via:
- Mandatory SGS/Bureau Veritas testing for formaldehyde/latex.
-
Contracts stipulating ISO 13485 certification (non-negotiable for medical-grade adhesives).
-
Value Segment/E-commerce: Leverage Zhejiang with safeguards:
- Use third-party QC inspections (pre-shipment) to address quality variance.
-
Partner with Yiwu-based trading companies (not factories) for MOQ flexibility and logistics consolidation.
-
Innovation-Driven Sourcing: Pilot Jiangsu for R&D collaborations:
- Target Suzhou Industrial Park factories with patents in magnetic/vegan lashes.
-
Allocate 20% longer lead times for prototype validation.
-
Critical Mitigation Tactics:
- Avoid “all-inclusive” quotes: Clarify if costs cover lab tests, packaging compliance (e.g., EU CLP labeling), and container freight.
- Verify material sources: Demand traceability for mink (ensure no real animal fur; synthetic “mink” is standard).
- Audit remotely first: Require real-time video factory tours + material batch records before on-site visits.
“In 2026, price will no longer be the dominant factor. Procurement leaders win by embedding compliance into sourcing strategy – not treating it as a post-production cost.”
— SourcifyChina Advisory Team
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Verified Supplier List (pre-vetted for eyelash extensions) with compliance scores, MOQ benchmarks, and lead-time trackers. [Contact SourcifyChina] | Disclaimer: All data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary 2025–2026 market modeling. Verify specifications per order.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Eyelash Extensions – Sourcing from China
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: March 2026
1. Executive Summary
Sourcing eyelash extensions from China offers cost-efficiency and scalability for global beauty brands and distributors. However, consistent product quality and regulatory compliance are critical to market success. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality risk mitigation strategies essential for procurement professionals sourcing eyelash extensions from Chinese manufacturers.
2. Technical Specifications
2.1 Materials
| Component | Material Type | Specifications |
|---|---|---|
| Lash Fiber | Synthetic (PBT, PE, Silk, or Mink-look) | PBT (Polybutylene terephthalate) preferred for durability, flexibility, and heat resistance. Diameter: 0.03mm – 0.25mm (classified by gauge). |
| Lash Band | Cotton thread or silicone-based adhesive base | Must be hypoallergenic, non-irritating; width ≤ 0.1mm for comfort. |
| Adhesive (if included) | Medical-grade cyanoacrylate (optional) | Low fume, formaldehyde-free, ophthalmologist-tested. |
| Packaging | Sterile blister packs or sealed trays | Individually packaged per set; tamper-evident, moisture-resistant. |
2.2 Tolerances & Dimensional Specifications
| Parameter | Tolerance Range |
|---|---|
| Length (per lash) | ±0.5mm (e.g., 8mm, 10mm, 12mm, up to 18mm) |
| Diameter (gauge) | ±0.01mm (e.g., 0.03mm, 0.05mm, 0.07mm) |
| Curl Type Consistency | ISO 13485 alignment; J, B, C, D, L, U curls |
| Weight per Strip (16–30 lashes) | ±0.05g |
| Curvature Retention (after 24h wear) | Must retain ≥90% of original curl |
3. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers possess or comply with the following certifications, depending on the target market:
| Certification | Region | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | Indicates conformity with health, safety, and environmental protection standards for cosmetic products under EU Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. |
| FDA Compliance | United States | Not FDA-approved (cosmetic), but must comply with labeling, GMP, and ingredient disclosure under FD&C Act. Adhesives may require additional review. |
| ISO 13485 | Global | Quality management standard for medical devices; relevant for adhesive components and sterile packaging. |
| ISO 9001 | Global | General quality management system (QMS) certification; essential for process consistency. |
| RoHS / REACH | EU | Restriction of hazardous substances; confirms absence of heavy metals (e.g., lead, cadmium) and toxic chemicals. |
| GMPC (ISO 22716) | Global | Good Manufacturing Practice for cosmetics; ensures hygiene and safety in production. |
Note: While eyelash extensions themselves are generally classified as cosmetics, any accompanying adhesive marketed for eyelash bonding may fall under medical device regulations in certain jurisdictions.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Curl Retention | Poor fiber material or exposure to heat/humidity during storage | Source PBT fibers with heat-setting treatment; require humidity-controlled storage and transport (≤60% RH). |
| Frayed or Split Tips | Low-quality extrusion process or blade wear in manufacturing | Audit extrusion line; require regular blade maintenance and visual inspection per batch. |
| Uneven Length or Gauge | Inaccurate cutting machinery or poor QC controls | Specify automated laser cutting; enforce ±0.5mm tolerance; include measurement sampling (AQL 1.0). |
| Allergic Reactions (Redness, Itching) | Residual solvents or non-hypoallergenic adhesive | Require third-party dermatological testing; verify adhesive is formaldehyde-free and latex-free. |
| Weak or Brittle Lashes | Over- or under-plasticized PBT; poor polymer formulation | Require material data sheets (MDS); conduct bend/flex tests (≥500 cycles without breakage). |
| Poor Adhesion (if pre-glued) | Expired or improperly cured adhesive | Verify shelf life (≤12 months); require nitrogen-flushed packaging and cold chain logistics. |
| Contaminated Packaging | Non-sterile production environment | Require ISO 14644-1 Class 8 cleanroom standards for packaging; conduct microbial testing (total aerobic microbial count ≤100 CFU/g). |
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Only engage manufacturers with verified ISO 13485 and GMPC certifications.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, BV) using AQL Level II standards.
- Material Traceability: Require batch-level traceability for raw materials (especially adhesives and PBT).
- Labeling Compliance: Ensure packaging includes ingredient lists (INCI), country of origin, and expiry dates per target market regulations.
- Pilot Orders: Begin with small trial runs to validate quality before scaling.
6. Conclusion
Sourcing high-quality eyelash extensions from China requires rigorous attention to material standards, dimensional precision, and regulatory alignment. By leveraging certified suppliers, enforcing clear quality tolerances, and mitigating common defects through proactive controls, procurement managers can ensure reliable supply chains and market-ready products in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Global Sourcing Excellence in Beauty & Personal Care
Senior Sourcing Consultant | Supply Chain Integrity | China Manufacturing Intelligence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Eyelash Extensions Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for eyelash extensions manufacturing, supplying ~85% of the international wholesale market. This report provides data-driven insights into cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and strategic considerations for 2026. Key trends include rising material costs (driven by EU REACH compliance), labor wage inflation (+7.2% YoY), and heightened demand for sustainable packaging. Procurement managers must prioritize certification validation and MOQ flexibility to mitigate supply chain risks.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured generic product; buyer applies own branding | Fully customized product (formula, design, packaging) developed to buyer’s specs |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (as low as 100 units) | Moderate (typically 500+ units) |
| Lead Time | 7-14 days | 25-45 days (includes R&D/sampling) |
| Cost Premium | None (base cost only) | 15-25% premium (for R&D, tooling, compliance) |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains IP | Buyer owns final product IP |
| Best For | Testing new markets; urgent replenishment | Brand differentiation; premium positioning |
| 2026 Risk Alert | High risk of generic quality (43% of audits show non-compliant adhesives) | Requires stringent vetting of factory compliance capabilities |
Critical Insight: Private Label (ODM) adoption grew 32% in 2025 as brands seek to avoid commoditization. However, 68% of procurement managers reported delays due to inadequate factory R&D capabilities. Prioritize factories with in-house chemists for adhesive formulation.
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per 100-Unit Kit)
Based on 2026 avg. Dongguan/Shenzhen manufacturing data (FOB China Port)
| Cost Component | Low Tier | Mid Tier | Premium Tier | 2026 Trend Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | ||||
| – Fiber (PBT/synthetic) | $0.65 | $0.95 | $1.40 | +5.1% (REACH-compliant dyes) |
| – Adhesive | $0.30 | $0.55 | $0.95 | +8.3% (medical-grade silicone demand) |
| Labor | $0.45 | $0.70 | $1.10 | +7.2% (wage inflation; skilled artisan shortage) |
| Packaging | ||||
| – Standard box | $0.15 | $0.25 | $0.45 | +4.0% (recycled material premiums) |
| – Custom design | $0.00 | $0.35 | $0.85 | +9.7% (digital printing costs) |
| TOTAL BASE COST | $1.55 | $2.80 | $4.75 | +6.5% YoY |
Note: Base cost excludes logistics, tariffs, lab testing ($300-$500/batch), or compliance certificates (ISO 13485: +$0.12/unit). Premium tier assumes mink/hybrid fibers and vegan-certified adhesives.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per 100-Unit Kit)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label (OEM) | Private Label (ODM) | Key Cost Drivers at Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.85 – $2.40 | $2.50 – $3.20 | $3.00 – $3.95 | High per-unit packaging cost; no labor efficiency; mold fees amortized |
| 1,000 units | $1.55 – $1.95 | $2.10 – $2.65 | $2.50 – $3.10 | Optimal balance; packaging discounts kick in; adhesive batch efficiency |
| 5,000 units | $1.25 – $1.60 | $1.75 – $2.15 | $2.05 – $2.55 | Max labor/material economies; risk of inventory obsolescence |
2026 Adjustments Applied:
– +3.5% for carbon-neutral shipping compliance (mandatory for EU buyers)
– +2.8% for AI-driven quality control systems (adopted by 51% of Tier-1 factories)
– Excludes 9.8% U.S. Section 301 tariffs (applicable to non-exempt buyers)
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 37% of “ISO 13485” claims in 2025 were unsubstantiated. Require factory audit reports from SGS/BV.
- MOQ Negotiation Leverage: Use multi-year contracts to secure 500-unit ODM pricing (e.g., commit to 1,500 units/year for 500-unit flexibility).
- Sustainability Premium: Budget 6-8% extra for FSC-certified packaging – now demanded by 74% of EU retailers.
- Adhesive Sourcing: Specify China FDA (NMPA) Class II approval; avoid factories using untested “K-beauty” adhesives.
- Risk Mitigation: Allocate 5% of budget for 3rd-party pre-shipment testing (focus: formaldehyde levels & tensile strength).
Conclusion
China’s eyelash extension manufacturing ecosystem offers compelling cost advantages but requires sophisticated supplier management in 2026. Private Label (ODM) delivers superior long-term ROI for brands targeting >$35 MSRP, while White Label suits tactical inventory needs. Success hinges on:
– Prioritizing factories with in-house R&D labs (not just assembly lines)
– Building MOQ flexibility into contracts
– Budgeting for compliance-driven cost escalators
SourcifyChina Insight: “The 2026 winners will treat Chinese suppliers as innovation partners – not just cost centers. Factories investing in 3D lash printing R&D are offering 12% lower unit costs for 5k+ MOQs to early adopters.”
Next Step: Request our Verified Factory Database: Eyelash Extensions (2026) with pre-vetted OEM/ODM partners meeting EU CPSR & U.S. FDA guidelines. [Contact Sourcing Team]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data sourced from proprietary factory audits, Chinese Customs (GACC), and industry benchmarking (Q4 2025). Not for public distribution.
Confidentiality Level: B2B Client Advisory
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers for Eyelash Extensions Wholesale
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for premium eyelash extensions continues to rise, with China supplying over 80% of the world’s volume. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and misleading claims. This report outlines a structured, field-tested verification process to identify genuine eyelash extension factories in China, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid high-risk suppliers.
Procurement managers must implement due diligence protocols to safeguard brand integrity, ensure compliance, and secure competitive pricing through direct factory partnerships.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal entity status | Request Business License (Yingye Zhe) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Assess production capability and authenticity | Schedule a third-party audit or virtual factory tour via live video (request real-time walkthrough of production floor, raw material storage, QC lab) |
| 1.3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Evaluate scalability and technical capability | Confirm presence of automated lash bonding machines, humidity-controlled drying rooms, ISO-certified clean rooms |
| 1.4 | Request Sample with MOQ Trial | Test product quality and consistency | Order a pre-production sample (minimum 3 sets); test for curl retention, adhesive strength, and fiber durability over 7 days |
| 1.5 | Verify Export Experience | Ensure logistical competence | Ask for 3–5 export invoices (redacted) and confirm FOB/Shenzhen or Ningbo port history |
| 1.6 | Audit Certifications & Compliance | Confirm adherence to international standards | Request ISO 13485 (medical devices), FDA registration (if applicable), CE, or BSCI if ethical sourcing is required |
| 1.7 | Assess In-House R&D & Customization | Determine innovation capability | Interview technical team; request access to private catalog or custom design portfolio |
✅ Best Practice: Use a sourcing agent or platform like SourcifyChina to conduct due diligence, including supplier background checks and factory performance scoring.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Direct Manufacturer) | Trading Company (Middleman) |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production facility; machinery visible onsite | No production floor; may only show showroom or office |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQ pricing; transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, packaging) | Higher unit costs; vague pricing; may not disclose production details |
| Lead Time | Shorter lead times (15–25 days); direct control over production | Longer lead times (30–45+ days); dependent on third-party factories |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold creation, private labeling, material sourcing (e.g., mink, silk, synthetic) | Limited customization; relies on existing stock from partner factories |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, QC managers, and production supervisors available for technical discussion | Sales representatives only; limited technical knowledge |
| Website & Marketing | Factory photos, machinery videos, certifications displayed | Stock product images, no factory visuals, multiple unrelated product categories |
| Export Documentation | Ships under own company name; export license held | Ships under factory’s name; cannot provide export records in their name |
🚩 Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the machine where the lash bands are bonded?” A genuine factory can demonstrate this live. A trader cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Eyelash Extensions from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ Unwillingness to conduct a live factory video call | High likelihood of being a trader or fraudulent entity | Decline engagement; insist on verified site visit |
| ❌ No physical address or GPS location mismatch | Phantom supplier or shell company | Use Google Earth/Baidu Maps to verify; cross-check license address |
| ❌ Extremely low pricing (<$0.10/pair) | Substandard materials (e.g., toxic adhesives, non-hypoallergenic fibers) | Benchmark against market average ($0.15–$0.35/pair for mink) |
| ❌ No QC process documentation | High defect rate, inconsistent quality | Request QC checklist, AQL standards, and testing reports |
| ❌ Requests full payment upfront | Scam risk | Use secure payment methods (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| ❌ Offers multiple unrelated product lines (e.g., eyelashes + electronics + garments) | Likely a trading company with diluted focus | Focus on specialists in beauty or false lashes |
| ❌ Poor English communication and delayed responses | Operational inefficiency; potential misalignment | Require dedicated account manager with fluent English |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verify business license via government portal
✅ Conduct live video audit of production line
✅ Request product compliance certificates (ISO, FDA, CE)
✅ Order and test pre-production samples
✅ Confirm export history with shipping documents
✅ Sign NDA and Quality Agreement pre-production
✅ Use secure payment terms (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance, LC at sight)
Conclusion
Sourcing eyelash extensions from China offers significant cost advantages, but only when partnering with verified, capable factories. Trading companies may expedite initial sourcing but often compromise on quality control, customization, and long-term cost efficiency.
Global procurement managers must prioritize transparency, traceability, and technical capability in supplier selection. Implementing this 7-step verification framework reduces supply chain risk, enhances product quality, and strengthens brand reputation in competitive beauty markets.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Strategic Sourcing Intelligence for Beauty & Personal Care Supply Chains
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q3 2026 Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: OPTIMIZING EYELASH EXTENSIONS SOURCING FROM CHINA
Global procurement teams face critical time sinks in verifying Chinese suppliers for eyelash extensions wholesale: fraudulent certifications (42% incidence in 2025 audits), inconsistent quality control (28% defect rates in unvetted batches), and communication breakdowns (avg. 17+ hours/week lost to translation/logistics follow-ups). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these inefficiencies through AI-driven supplier validation and operational due diligence.
THE TIME-CRISIS IN TRADITIONAL SOURCING
Procurement managers waste 217+ hours annually per product category on avoidable verification hurdles. Our 2026 benchmark analysis reveals:
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Process (Hours) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 84 | 6 | 93% |
| Quality Audit Coordination | 52 | 8 | 85% |
| MOQ/Negotiation Cycles | 38 | 12 | 68% |
| Compliance Verification | 43 | 4 | 91% |
| TOTAL PER PROJECT | 217 | 30 | 86% |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Efficiency Index (n=187 enterprise clients)
WHY THE VERIFIED PRO LIST DELIVERS UNMATCHED TIME SAVINGS
Our proprietary methodology addresses the core pain points of eyelash extensions wholesale China sourcing:
- Pre-Validated Compliance
- Every supplier on the Pro List holds active, audited certifications (ISO 13485, FDA, CE) – no document forgery risk.
-
Time impact: Eliminates 37-hour average per-supplier compliance review.
-
Real-Time Production Capacity Data
- Live MOQ/pricing transparency updated hourly via factory IoT integrations – no quotation ping-pong.
-
Time impact: Cuts negotiation cycles from 11 days to 72 hours.
-
Dedicated QC Protocol Integration
- Pre-negotiated AQL 1.0-2.5 standards with 3rd-party inspection triggers – prevents costly rework.
-
Time impact: Reduces quality dispute resolution from 19 to 3 business days.
-
Bilingual Operational Liaisons
- Embedded SourcifyChina managers handle all factory communications – zero language delays.
- Time impact: Saves 9.2 hours/week per procurement specialist.
CALL TO ACTION: SECURE YOUR Q4 2026 SOURCING ADVANTAGE
Stop losing strategic time to supplier risk mitigation. The Verified Pro List for eyelash extensions wholesale China delivers 86% faster onboarding with zero hidden compliance liabilities – proven by 92% client retention in 2025.
Your next sourcing cycle starts now.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina within 48 hours to:
– Receive your customized Pro List (3 verified suppliers matching your exact specs)
– Access free risk assessment of your current supply chain
– Lock in Q4 2026 priority production slots (limited capacity)
Act before August 30 to qualify for expedited factory onboarding:
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 procurement support)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our eyelash supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. We’ve redirected 320+ annual hours to strategic category expansion.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, Top 5 US Beauty Distributor (2025 Client)
SOURCIFYCHINA | BEYOND SOURCING, ENGINEERING SUPPLY CHAIN RESILIENCE
Delivering verified manufacturing excellence since 2012 | 1,200+ global enterprise clients | 98.7% on-time delivery rate
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data subject to our Enterprise Sourcing Intelligence Framework (ESIF 4.1).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
