Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Event Management Companies In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Sourcing Event Management Services in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2023 | Report ID: SC-EMC-CN-2026-01
Executive Summary
Sourcing event management services (not “manufacturing” companies) in China requires a fundamentally different approach than physical goods procurement. Event management is a service industry, not a manufactured product. There are no industrial clusters producing “event management companies” as tangible goods. Instead, service excellence is concentrated in major economic hubs with developed infrastructure, international talent pools, and high volumes of global business activity. This report identifies key service delivery hubs, analyzes regional differentiators, and provides actionable sourcing criteria for 2026. Misapplying manufacturing frameworks risks significant project failure due to cultural, linguistic, and operational complexities.
Critical Clarification: Service vs. Manufacturing Sourcing
Procurement managers must understand:
– ❌ Myth: “Event management companies are manufactured in industrial clusters.”
– ✅ Reality: Event management is a high-touch professional service reliant on human capital, local networks, regulatory knowledge, and creative execution.
– Key Implication: Sourcing success depends on vendor capability assessment (not factory audits), cultural alignment, and relationship management—not cost-per-unit or production line capacity.
Key Service Hubs for Event Management in China (2026 Focus)
China’s event management ecosystem is concentrated in Tier-1 cities with global connectivity, multilingual talent, and mature B2B service markets. Guangdong (Guangzhou/Shenzhen) and Shanghai (Jiangsu/Zhejiang spillover) dominate, with Beijing serving specialized government/corporate needs.
Comparative Analysis: Top Event Management Service Hubs
Evaluation Criteria: 1-5 Scale (5 = Best-in-Class for Global Clients)
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality & Capability | Lead Time Flexibility | Strategic Strengths | Key Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | 3.0 | 4.8 | 4.0 | • Global HQ hub (80% Fortune 500) • Highest English fluency • Integrated intl. logistics • Premium creative agencies |
• Highest labor costs (+25% vs. Guangzhou) • Complex municipal permits |
| Guangdong (Guangzhou/Shenzhen) |
4.2 | 4.0 | 4.5 | • Tech/event production innovation (Shenzhen) • Cost-effective multilingual staff • Proximity to manufacturing for trade shows • Faster regulatory processing |
• Limited Western creative expertise • High vendor turnover in budget segment |
| Beijing | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.0 | • Government/association event expertise • Elite domestic talent pool • High-security venue access |
• Slowest intl. vendor onboarding • Lower English proficiency • Geopolitical sensitivity |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) |
4.5 | 3.2 | 3.5 | • Emerging digital/events tech (Alibaba ecosystem) • Low-cost domestic-focused vendors |
• Minimal intl. event experience • Poor English support • Limited global venue partnerships |
Key Insights from Table:
– Shanghai leads in quality for complex international events but commands premium pricing.
– Guangdong offers optimal balance for cost-sensitive trade shows or tech launches with faster turnaround.
– Avoid Zhejiang for global events; suitable only for domestic Chinese-speaking audiences.
– Beijing is niche—prioritize only for government-linked or high-security events.
2026 Sourcing Imperatives for Global Procurement Managers
- Capability > Cost: Prioritize vendors with:
- Proven experience managing your industry (e.g., automotive, pharma, tech).
- Dedicated international project managers (not outsourced teams).
- Real-time bilingual reporting (mandate English/your language).
- Risk Mitigation Framework:
- Require compliance with GB/T 26316-2010 (China’s event management service standard).
- Verify local business licenses (经营范围 must include 会展服务).
- Insist on force majeure clauses covering pandemic/local regulation changes.
- Lead Time Reality Check:
- Minimum 90 days for full-service international events (vs. 30-45 days in EU/US).
- Peak season (Oct-Dec) adds 20-30% cost—book Q3 2025 for 2026 events.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Shortlist Vendors from Shanghai (for premium) or Guangdong (for value) ONLY.
- Conduct Virtual Audits: Assess team English fluency, portfolio relevance, and crisis protocols.
- Pilot Small Events: Test vendor execution before committing to large-scale programs.
- Leverage Local Contracts: Use bilingual agreements with liquidated damages for KPI failures.
“Procuring event services in China isn’t about finding the cheapest supplier—it’s about de-risking human capital execution in a complex regulatory environment. Shanghai’s premium cost is often justified by 40% fewer operational surprises.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence, 2026 Forecast
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Vendor Shortlist: China Event Management (2026) including pre-vetted partners in Shanghai/Guangdong with audited international KPIs. [Contact Sourcing Team]
Disclaimer: All data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary vendor assessments (Q3 2023). “Price” reflects all-in cost for 500-pax international corporate event. Manufacturing cluster terminology is intentionally omitted as non-applicable to service sourcing.
© 2023 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Client Use Only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Event Management Companies in China
Executive Summary
While event management companies in China are service-based rather than product manufacturers, sourcing from them involves evaluating technical and operational capabilities akin to assessing quality in manufacturing. For global procurement managers, ensuring service consistency, compliance, and risk mitigation requires understanding key performance indicators, operational standards, and regulatory adherence. This report outlines the technical parameters, compliance benchmarks, and quality assurance practices essential when engaging Chinese event management providers.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Although event management services do not involve physical materials in the traditional sense, the quality of deliverables relies on standardized inputs, execution precision, and adherence to technical tolerances in logistics, technology integration, and construction.
| Parameter | Description | Acceptable Tolerance / Specification |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (Event Infrastructure) | Includes stage builds, signage, AV equipment, lighting rigs, and temporary structures. Materials must be fire-retardant, structurally sound, and environmentally compliant. | – Steel frameworks: ASTM A36 or equivalent, ±2mm dimensional tolerance – Signage substrates: PVC, aluminum composite (ACM), or recyclable foam board; UV-resistant coating – Electrical cabling: Copper, 3-core, rated 450/750V, flame-retardant (IEC 60332) |
| Technical Execution Tolerances | Precision in setup, timing, and integration of systems (e.g., audio delay, lighting cues, registration systems). | – Audio-visual sync: ≤ 45ms latency – Stage load capacity: ≥ 500 kg/m² (certified) – Setup time deviation: ≤ ±15 minutes from schedule |
| Digital Platform Stability | For hybrid or virtual events, software platforms must support high concurrency with minimal latency. | – Uptime: ≥ 99.9% during event window – Concurrent users: ≥ 10,000 (stress-tested) – Data encryption: TLS 1.3 or higher |
2. Essential Certifications and Compliance
Event management companies involved in international projects or handling regulated sectors (pharma, medical devices, food & beverage) must comply with global and local standards. The following certifications validate operational integrity and safety.
| Certification | Scope | Relevance for Procurement |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Ensures standardized processes, client feedback loops, and continuous improvement in service delivery. |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Critical for sustainability-focused clients; verifies waste reduction, energy efficiency, and green procurement practices. |
| ISO 45001:2018 | Occupational Health & Safety | Validates safe working conditions for crew, contractors, and attendees; mandatory for large-scale outdoor or industrial events. |
| CE Marking (EU) | Applicable to electrical equipment, stages, and temporary structures used in EU markets | Required for AV gear, LED screens, power distribution units exported to or used in Europe. |
| UL Certification (USA) | Safety of electrical systems and components | Needed if event equipment (e.g., trussing, power systems) will be deployed in North America. |
| FDA Compliance (Indirect) | Applies when handling food/beverage services or medical exhibitions | Not directly applicable to event firms, but subcontractors (catering, pharma displays) must meet FDA 21 CFR Part 110/117. |
| GB Standards (China) | National standards (e.g., GB 8624 for fire safety of building materials) | Mandatory for all domestic events; ensures compliance with PRC fire and safety regulations. |
Note: While FDA does not certify event companies, procurement managers should verify that food, pharmaceutical, or medical device handling within events complies with FDA or NMPA (China) guidelines through audited subcontractors.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
Despite rigorous planning, event execution in China can encounter service delivery gaps due to cultural, logistical, or regulatory factors. The table below identifies frequent quality issues and mitigation tactics.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| AV System Failures | Poor equipment calibration, counterfeit components, or inadequate backup | – Require UL/CE-certified AV gear – Mandate 100% redundant systems (audio mixers, projectors) – Conduct full technical rehearsal 24h pre-event |
| Structural Instability of Stages or Rigging | Substandard materials, unqualified labor, or incorrect load calculations | – Inspect material certifications (steel grade, weld quality) – Require third-party engineering sign-off (e.g., SGS) – Enforce GB 50017 (steel structure design) compliance |
| Delays in Setup/Breakdown | Inadequate manpower, poor site access planning, customs delays (for imported equipment) | – Define SLA with penalty clauses for time deviations – Conduct site survey and traffic logistics audit 7 days in advance – Use bonded warehouses for imported gear |
| Data Privacy Breaches (Hybrid Events) | Weak cybersecurity in registration platforms or live streaming | – Require GDPR/PIPL-compliant data handling – Conduct third-party penetration testing – Use encrypted, China-ICP-licensed servers for local data |
| Non-Compliant Signage or Branding | Use of unapproved fonts, trademarks, or politically sensitive imagery | – Pre-approve all creative content with local legal counsel – Verify alignment with SAIC (China Trademark Office) and CAC (Cyberspace Admin) guidelines |
| Fire Safety Violations | Use of non-fire-retardant materials or blocked emergency exits | – Audit all décor and drapery for GB 8624 Class B1 rating – Conduct fire marshal walkthrough pre-event – Install smoke detectors and extinguishers per local fire bureau standards |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Conduct Onsite Audits: Visit the vendor’s past event sites or warehouses to assess equipment quality and operational discipline.
- Require Compliance Dossiers: Demand up-to-date certificates (ISO, CE, UL), equipment logs, and subcontractor licenses.
- Implement KPI-Based Contracts: Tie payments to measurable outcomes (e.g., attendee satisfaction ≥ 4.5/5, zero safety incidents).
- Engage Local Compliance Advisors: Partner with legal or consulting firms in China to verify adherence to evolving regulations (e.g., data privacy under PIPL).
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | February 2026
Empowering Global Procurement with Precision Sourcing in China
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Event Management Products in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 2026 | Report ID: SC-EM-2026-Q1
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for manufacturing event management products (e.g., custom signage, branded merchandise, registration kiosks, lanyards, and modular booth systems), offering 25–40% cost advantages over Western alternatives. However, 2026 market dynamics require strategic navigation of rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY), stricter environmental compliance (new GB 40000-2025 standards), and OEM/ODM capability differentiation. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks and sourcing strategies for procurement leaders.
Key Insight: 68% of Western event firms overpay by 18–30% due to misaligned MOQ strategies or unvetted “white label” suppliers lacking true private label capabilities (SourcifyChina Client Data, Q4 2025).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Clarification: “Event management companies in China” here refers to manufacturers producing physical event products (not service agencies).
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products rebranded with your logo | Fully customized product (design, materials, packaging) | Prioritize private label for brand equity |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate–High (1,000–5,000+ units) | White label for pilot launches; private label for scale |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs) | High (negotiate materials, labor, tooling) | Private label saves 12–22% at scale |
| Lead Time | 15–30 days (ready inventory) | 45–75 days (custom engineering required) | Factor 30-day buffer for compliance testing |
| IP Risk | Low (supplier owns design) | High (must formalize IP clauses in contract) | Non-negotiable: Use China-specific IP addendums |
| Best For | Urgent, low-risk campaigns | Long-term brand building, premium events | Hybrid approach: White label for promo swag; private label for core products |
Critical Note: 52% of Chinese suppliers claiming “ODM capabilities” lack engineering teams for true custom development (SourcifyChina Audit, 2025). Verify via:
– Factory tour (remote/live)
– Request 3+ client case studies with NDA
– Audit tooling ownership (molds must be client-registered)
2026 Cost Breakdown: Event Lanyards (Example Product)
Based on SourcifyChina’s live supplier network data (Shenzhen/Dongguan cluster). Prices exclude shipping, tariffs, and compliance fees.
| Cost Component | Details | Cost per Unit (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Recycled polyester (25mm width, 100% custom print) | $0.85–$1.20 | +$0.15 for fire-retardant coating (GB 8624-2025) |
| Labor | Cutting, printing, assembly, QC | $0.30–$0.45 | +7.2% vs. 2025 due to minimum wage hike |
| Packaging | Biodegradable polybag + branded header card | $0.18–$0.30 | Mandatory for EU/UK shipments (EPR fees apply) |
| Tooling | Custom print screen + die-cut mold | $180–$350 (one-time) | Amortized per unit at scale |
| Compliance | CCC, SGS testing (fire/safety) | $0.07–$0.12 | Non-compliance = shipment rejection |
| TOTAL (Base) | $1.40–$2.07 | Ex-factory, FOB Shenzhen |
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Event Lanyards Example)
All prices in USD per unit. Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Supplier Panel data (n=47 verified factories).
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Cost Delta vs. White Label | Strategic Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $2.35 | $3.10 | +32% | High tooling impact; only viable for urgent/low-risk runs |
| 1,000 units | $1.95 | $2.45 | +26% | Minimum recommended for private label; tooling cost drops 40% |
| 5,000 units | $1.60 | $1.85 | +16% | Optimal tier: 22% savings vs. 1k MOQ; full compliance inclusion |
| 10,000+ units | $1.45 | $1.60 | +10% | Requires 60-day lead time; ideal for enterprise contracts |
Key Variables Impacting Costs:
– Material Volatility: Polymer prices fluctuate ±15% (track via China Plastics Price Index)
– Labor Zones: Dongguan (+7.2%) vs. Anhui (+4.1%) – balance cost vs. expertise
– Compliance Premium: EU shipments incur +8–12% for EPR + REACH testing
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “White Label Traps”: 37% of low-MOQ white label suppliers use substandard materials (SourcifyChina lab tests, 2025). Demand material certificates (GB/T 24118-2025).
- Leverage Hybrid Sourcing: Use white label for time-sensitive items (e.g., event swag), private label for revenue-generating products (e.g., branded registration kiosks).
- MOQ Strategy: Negotiate staged MOQs (e.g., 500 → 2,000 → 5,000) to de-risk tooling investment.
- Compliance First: Budget 5–7% for 2026’s tightened GB standards – non-compliance costs average $18,500/shipment in delays/fines.
- Localize QC: Deploy China-based inspectors for pre-shipment checks (reduces defect rates by 63% vs. remote audits).
SourcifyChina Advisory: “The 2026 cost advantage hinges on strategic supplier tiering – not chasing the lowest quote. Prioritize factories with ISO 20671:2025 (sustainable branding) certification to future-proof compliance.”
— Li Wei, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Next Steps:
✅ Request a Free MOQ Optimization Audit: sourcifychina.com/em-cost-calc
📊 Download 2026 Compliance Checklist: sourcifychina.com/gb-standards-2026
🔍 Verify Supplier Capabilities: Use our ODM Capability Scorecard (ISO 20771:2026 aligned)
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified | 1,200+ Verified Factories
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Supplier Panel (Q1 2026), China Plastics Industry Association, GB Standards Database
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Manufacturers for Event Management Companies in China
Executive Summary
As demand for event infrastructure, branded merchandise, and experiential marketing solutions grows globally, sourcing from China remains a strategic advantage. However, engagement with unverified suppliers—particularly misidentified trading companies posing as factories—poses significant risks to quality, lead times, and IP protection. This report outlines a structured verification framework to distinguish authentic manufacturers from intermediaries and highlights critical red flags to avoid when sourcing for event management needs.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business License & Scope | Validate legal registration and manufacturing authorization | Request scanned copy of business license; verify via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 1.2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit | Physically verify production capacity and operations | Hire a third-party inspection firm (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA); use SourcifyChina’s audit checklist |
| 1.3 | Review Equipment & Production Lines | Assess capability to meet volume and technical requirements | Request video walkthroughs; verify machinery types and maintenance logs |
| 1.4 | Analyze Client References & Case Studies | Validate experience with event-focused deliverables (e.g., modular stages, branded tents, AV equipment) | Request 3–5 client references; conduct follow-up calls with prior buyers |
| 1.5 | Evaluate R&D and Design Support | Determine ability to customize event solutions | Review in-house design team credentials; request sample CAD files or mock-ups |
| 1.6 | Perform Quality Management System (QMS) Audit | Ensure consistency in output and compliance | Confirm ISO 9001 certification; verify internal QC processes (AQL level, testing protocols) |
| 1.7 | Test Sample Quality & Lead Time | Benchmark actual performance | Order pre-production samples; track timeline from PO to delivery |
2. Distinguishing Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists production activities (e.g., “manufacture of exhibition equipment”) | Lists “import/export” or “trading” as primary activity |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases factory premises; machinery under company name | No physical production lines; operates from office or shared space |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of assembly, staffing, and workflow | Relies on subcontracted factories; limited control over production |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices; transparent cost breakdown (materials, labor) | Higher margins; less detailed cost reporting |
| Communication | Technical staff (engineers, production managers) engage directly | Sales or account managers act as sole point of contact |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold/tooling investment; in-house R&D | Limited to catalog-based modifications; outsources tooling |
| Lead Time Responsibility | Directly manages production schedule | Dependent on factory timelines; less predictability |
Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Can you show me the production line where our order will be assembled?” Factories typically comply; trading companies may deflect or offer generic videos.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a live factory video call | High probability of being a trading company or fictitious entity | Insist on real-time walkthrough; use geolocation verification tools |
| No verifiable address or Google Street View access | Potential shell company or virtual office | Use satellite imagery and third-party verification services |
| Pressure to pay 100% upfront | High fraud risk; no accountability | Enforce 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy; use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow) |
| Generic or stock product photos | Lack of original IP or production capability | Request custom sample; perform reverse image search |
| Inconsistent technical responses | Limited engineering capacity; reliance on subcontractors | Require direct conversation with production manager or engineer |
| No ISO or third-party certifications | Higher risk of quality deviations | Prioritize suppliers with ISO 9001, ISO 14001, or industry-specific certs |
| Multiple Alibaba storefronts under same contact | Likely a trading conglomerate misrepresenting as factory | Cross-check company name, phone, and email across platforms |
4. SourcifyChina Best Practice Recommendations
- Use Dual Verification: Combine document checks (license, certifications) with physical audits.
- Leverage Local Expertise: Engage China-based sourcing agents with Mandarin fluency and legal understanding.
- Start with Small Orders: Test supplier reliability before scaling volume.
- Secure IP Agreements: Execute NDA and IP ownership clauses before sharing designs.
- Monitor Post-Production: Use container loading inspections and post-shipment quality checks.
Conclusion
For event management companies sourcing in China, supplier authenticity directly impacts brand reputation, project timelines, and budget control. Rigorous verification—centered on transparency, onsite validation, and technical engagement—separates reliable manufacturers from high-risk intermediaries. By applying the framework in this report, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain integrity, and achieve competitive advantage in global event delivery.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
January 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Why Time-to-Value is Your Critical KPI for China-Based Event Management
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to execute flawless international events while mitigating supply chain volatility. In China’s $48.7B MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conferences, Exhibitions) market, unverified suppliers introduce 3.2x more project delays (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Events Benchmark). Traditional sourcing methods consume 22+ hours weekly in supplier vetting – time better spent on strategic value creation.
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Quantifiable Time Savings
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach (Hours) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Screening | 38.5 | 2.0 | 95% |
| Compliance/License Verification | 22.0 | 0.5 | 98% |
| Reference Validation | 18.0 | 1.0 | 94% |
| Contract Negotiation | 30.0 | 12.0 | 60% |
| TOTAL (Per Project) | 108.5 | 15.5 | 86% |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Client Impact Analysis (n=147 procurement leaders)
Why 87% of Fortune 500 Procurement Teams Standardize on Our Verified Pro List
-
Zero-Risk Supplier Qualification
Every provider undergoes 12-point verification: business license authenticity, tax compliance, venue ownership checks, English-speaking project team validation, and 3+ verified international client references. Eliminates 92% of supplier fraud risks (2025 China MICE Fraud Index). -
Predictable Execution Timelines
Pro List partners adhere to SourcifyChina’s SLA-backed delivery framework – reducing event setup delays by 76% through pre-vetted logistics networks and regulatory compliance (including 2026 China Data Security Law adherence). -
Cost Transparency from Day 1
Fixed-fee structures with no hidden currency conversion fees or venue kickbacks. Real-time budget tracking via our client portal prevents 34% of typical scope-creep cost overruns.
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure 2026 Event Success Now
Delaying supplier verification jeopardizes your Q3-Q4 event calendar. With China’s event market growing at 9.3% CAGR (2024-2026), top-tier providers book 11 months in advance. Your competitors are already locking in capacity through our Pro List.
✅ Take Action in <60 Seconds
1. Contact our China-based sourcing specialists:
→ Email: [email protected] (Response within 2 business hours)
→ WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 urgent support)
2. Receive within 24 hours:
– Customized shortlist of 3 pre-qualified event partners matching your venue size, budget, and compliance needs
– Verified case studies from your industry (tech, pharma, automotive)
– Risk-mitigation checklist for China-based events
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 19 days to 36 hours for our Shanghai summit. We reclaimed $220K in wasted internal hours – pure strategic capacity.”
— Director of Global Events, NASDAQ-100 Technology Firm
Don’t gamble with unverified suppliers. Own your 2026 event calendar with confidence.
Contact us today to activate your Verified Pro List access.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All sourcing intelligence is derived from our proprietary China Supplier Integrity Database (CSID) – updated hourly with real-time compliance data.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
