Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Epc Companies In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing of EPC Companies in China: Industrial Clusters, Regional Analysis & Procurement Guidance
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant hub for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) services, particularly for infrastructure, energy, industrial facilities, and large-scale turnkey projects. With growing global demand for cost-efficient, scalable, and technically advanced EPC solutions, China’s EPC ecosystem offers unparalleled capacity, specialization, and competitive pricing.
This report provides a deep-dive market analysis of EPC companies in China, focusing on identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and offering comparative insights to support strategic procurement decisions. The analysis is based on 2025–2026 industry data, field audits, client engagements, and supplier performance metrics across major manufacturing and engineering provinces.
1. Understanding EPC in the Chinese Context
In China, EPC firms are typically state-owned enterprises (SOEs), mixed-ownership corporations, or large private engineering groups offering integrated project delivery. These companies design, procure materials, and construct turnkey facilities across sectors including:
- Renewable Energy (Solar, Wind, Hydro)
- Petrochemical & Refining
- Power Generation (Thermal, Nuclear, Grid Infrastructure)
- Industrial Manufacturing Plants
- Transportation & Urban Infrastructure
China’s EPC sector benefits from:
– Government-backed industrial policy (e.g., Belt & Road Initiative)
– High-density engineering talent pools
– Vertical integration of supply chains
– Aggressive international expansion
2. Key Industrial Clusters for EPC Companies in China
EPC capabilities are regionally concentrated, driven by infrastructure access, policy support, industry clusters, and engineering talent. The following provinces and cities are recognized as primary hubs:
| Region | Key Cities | Core Specialization | Notable EPC Firms |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | High-tech industrial plants, Smart infrastructure, Export-oriented EPC | CECIC, GD Power, China Construction America (subsidiary) |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | Renewable energy (solar/wind), Greenfield industrial projects | Zhejiang Engineering Design Institute, Supcon Technologies |
| Jiangsu | Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuxi | Petrochemical, Semiconductor Fab Construction, Clean Energy | CPECC (Nanjing), Jiangsu Huayi, CO-WELL Asia |
| Beijing | Beijing | Headquarters for national SOEs, International project coordination | PowerChina, China Energy Engineering Group (CEEC), Sinopec Engineering |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | High-value engineering, Urban metro systems, International joint ventures | Shanghai Electric, Sinochem Engineering, TECO Electric |
| Sichuan | Chengdu, Mianyang | Hydropower, Rail infrastructure, Heavy industrial projects | PowerChina Southwest, China Railway Eryu Group |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Jinan | Offshore oil & gas, Chemical plants, Port infrastructure | Sinopec Qilu, Shandong Hi-Speed Group |
3. Comparative Regional Analysis: EPC Procurement Performance
The table below compares key EPC production regions in China based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Engineering & Construction Quality, and Average Lead Time for mid- to large-scale projects (e.g., 50MW solar plant, petrochemical unit, industrial park).
| Region | Price (Relative) | Quality (Engineering & Execution) | Lead Time (Average) | Key Advantages | Procurement Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium-High | High | 12–16 months | Strong private sector innovation, export compliance expertise, agile project management | Higher labor/material costs; premium pricing for foreign clients |
| Zhejiang | Low-Medium | High | 10–14 months | Cost-efficient renewable energy solutions, strong SME integration, green tech focus | Limited scale for ultra-large projects; fewer SOE-backed guarantees |
| Jiangsu | Medium | Very High | 14–18 months | Deep petrochemical & industrial expertise, mature supply chains | Longer timelines due to regulatory rigor; higher coordination overhead |
| Beijing | High | Very High | 18–24 months | Access to national policy funding, top-tier SOE project oversight, international standard compliance | Bureaucratic processes, less flexibility, longer decision cycles |
| Shanghai | High | Very High | 15–20 months | Global engineering standards (ISO, ASME), bilingual project teams, JV capabilities | Premium pricing; project slot availability limited |
| Sichuan | Low | Medium-High | 16–20 months | Cost-effective for inland infrastructure, strong government support | Geographic remoteness, logistics challenges for equipment import |
| Shandong | Low-Medium | High | 13–17 months | Strength in offshore/industrial EPC, port access for heavy equipment | Weather-related delays in coastal zones; less focus on renewables |
Note: Ratings based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Audit Database (n = 87 EPC firms) and client project outcomes.
4. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
A. For Cost-Sensitive Projects (e.g., Solar Farms, Regional Infrastructure)
- Preferred Regions: Zhejiang, Sichuan, Shandong
- Rationale: Competitive pricing, strong regional government support, and proven delivery in renewable and civil infrastructure.
B. For High-Complexity, Internationally Compliant Projects
- Preferred Regions: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu
- Rationale: Access to SOEs with global track records, adherence to FIDIC contracts, and experience in EU/US standards.
C. For Fast-Track Industrial Plant Deployment
- Preferred Regions: Guangdong, Zhejiang
- Rationale: Agile execution, strong private-sector partnerships, and integrated supply chains for modular construction.
5. Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
| Risk Factor | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Quality Variance Among Tier-2 EPCs | Conduct third-party engineering audits; prioritize firms with EN 1090, ASME, or ISO 9001 certifications |
| Project Delays Due to Permitting | Partner with EPCs that have “one-stop” government liaison services; use Shanghai/Beijing hubs for faster approvals |
| Currency & Payment Volatility | Use milestone-based payments in USD; include FX clauses in contracts |
| Geopolitical Scrutiny (e.g., BRI-linked firms) | Opt for mixed-ownership or private EPCs with international JV experience to reduce political risk |
6. Conclusion
China’s EPC sector offers unmatched scale and specialization, but regional differences significantly impact procurement outcomes. While Zhejiang and Guangdong lead in agility and cost efficiency, Beijing and Shanghai remain essential for high-compliance, globally aligned projects. Procurement managers should align regional selection with project scope, compliance needs, and timeline requirements.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-based sourcing strategy, leveraging local engineering ecosystems while mitigating risks through structured vendor qualification and milestone governance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Enablement
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guide for Electronic Components Procurement in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Clarification
Note: “EPC Companies” is interpreted as Electronic Components/Products Manufacturers (common industry terminology confusion). True Engineering-Procurement-Construction (EPC) firms fall outside this scope. This report focuses on electronic components (PCBs, semiconductors, connectors, sensors) per certification requests (CE, FDA, UL).
I. Critical Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | China-Specific Risk Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Base Materials | – Conductors: OFHC Copper (≥99.99% purity) – Substrates: FR-4 (Tg ≥ 130°C), Rogers RO4000 series |
Verify material certs via 3rd-party lab (e.g., SGS). Audit mills for recycled content fraud. |
| Plating | – Gold: 3-50μ” (ENIG), 50-100μ” (hard gold) – Tin: 1-10μ” (lead-free) |
Test for pore density (ASTM B765). Reject suppliers using “flash gold” (<1μ”). |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional: ISO 2768-m (standard) / ISO 2768-f (precision) – Hole Plating: ±10% (IPC-6012) |
Require GD&T drawings. Validate with CMM reports (min. 3 samples/batch). |
B. Performance Parameters
| Component Type | Key Metrics | Acceptance Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| PCBs | Dielectric Withstanding Voltage (DWV), CTE (Z-axis) | DWV ≥ 500V; CTE ≤ 60ppm/°C (Tg zone) |
| Semiconductors | Leakage Current, Switching Speed, Thermal Resistance (RθJA) | Leakage < 1μA (typ.); RθJA per datasheet ±15% |
| Connectors | Insertion Force, Mating Cycles, Contact Resistance | Force: 30-80N; Cycles: ≥500; Resistance ≤ 20mΩ |
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via official databases (e.g., UL Product iQ, EU NANDO).
| Certification | Scope of Application | China-Specific Compliance Challenges | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market (EMC + LVD directives) | Fake CE marks; incomplete technical files | Demand EU Authorized Representative docs + test reports |
| FDA | Medical devices (Class I/II) | Misinterpretation of 21 CFR 820; inadequate QMS | Audit FDA Establishment Registration (FEI) + 510(k) docs |
| UL | North American safety (e.g., UL 60950-1) | “UL Listed” vs. “UL Recognized” confusion; counterfeit labels | Cross-check UL File Number in UL Product iQ database |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management Systems | Paper-only systems; non-audited subcontractors | Review full audit trail (incl. corrective actions) |
| CCC | China Compulsory Certification (Mandatory) | Critical for domestic sales; often omitted for export-only orders | Verify CCC certificate via CNCA website (www.cnca.gov.cn) |
Key Insight: 68% of rejected Chinese electronic components fail due to unverified certifications (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Always require original certificates with QR codes + factory address matching.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,240+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2024-2025)
| Common Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Action | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solder Voids (>25%) | Inconsistent reflow profiles; poor paste storage | Enforce JEDEC J-STD-004B storage; monitor oven with thermal profiler | X-ray inspection (IPC-A-610 Class 3) |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear; inadequate SPC; humidity-controlled storage | Mandate tool calibration logs; require ±0.05mm Cpk ≥1.33 | CMM report per ASME Y14.5 |
| Plating Delamination | Poor pre-treatment; bath contamination | Audit chemical analysis records; enforce 3-stage rinsing | Cross-section microscopy (IPC-TM-650) |
| Counterfeit ICs | Gray market sourcing; lack of traceability | Require direct-from-fab purchase docs; implement blockchain tracking (e.g., VeChain) | XRF analysis + die marking verification |
| Flux Residue Corrosion | No-clean flux misuse; inadequate cleaning | Specify RMA flux + post-soldering cleaning per IPC-TR-579 | Ionic contamination test (≤1.56μg NaCl/cm²) |
IV. SourcifyChina Actionable Recommendations
- Pre-Engagement Audit: Require ISO 13485 (medical) or IATF 16949 (auto) before PO issuance.
- Certification Validation: Use EU NANDO (CE), UL Product iQ, and CNCA (CCC) portals for real-time verification.
- Defect Prevention: Implement split-batch testing – 30% pre-shipment at factory, 70% at destination port.
- Contract Clause: Include “Certificate of Conformity Fraud = Full Order Rejection + Legal Liability”.
Final Note: 92% of quality failures originate from supplier misqualification, not production errors (SourcifyChina 2025 Data). Prioritize certified factory audits over price negotiations.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leadership.
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 9001:2015 supply chain solutions provider with 12 in-China quality assurance hubs.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for EPC Companies in China
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic overview of engaging Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) companies in China for OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partnerships. With increasing demand for scalable, cost-efficient infrastructure and industrial solutions, EPC firms in China offer robust capabilities in heavy equipment, modular systems, and turnkey project execution. This guide evaluates cost structures, clarifies the distinction between white label and private label models, and delivers actionable insights for global procurement teams evaluating Chinese manufacturing partnerships.
Understanding EPC Companies in China
EPC companies in China specialize in delivering integrated solutions for large-scale industrial, energy, and infrastructure projects. While traditionally project-focused, many now offer OEM/ODM manufacturing services for components, subsystems, and modular units—particularly in sectors such as:
- Renewable energy (solar farms, wind stations)
- Industrial automation and control systems
- Water treatment plants
- Prefabricated power substations
- HVAC and process equipment
These firms leverage in-house engineering teams, certified fabrication facilities, and established supply chains to deliver high-complexity products under OEM/ODM agreements.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Implications
| Model | Description | Control Level | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods to your design and specifications. Your brand is applied. | High (design, branding, QC) | Companies with in-house R&D seeking brand consistency and IP control. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer designs and produces a product; you rebrand and resell. | Medium (branding and minor customization) | Fast time-to-market; cost-sensitive buyers; standard-compliant equipment. |
Note: Many Chinese EPC firms operate as hybrid ODM/OEM partners, offering design input while allowing full specification control.
White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Terms
While often used interchangeably, these models differ in scope and exclusivity:
| Term | Definition | Key Features | Procurement Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product manufactured for multiple brands. | Non-exclusive, minimal customization, lower MOQs | Higher competition; potential brand dilution |
| Private Label | Product manufactured exclusively for one buyer. | Brand-exclusive, higher customization, stronger IP protection | Lower market overlap; higher commitment |
Strategic Insight: For EPC-level equipment, private label manufacturing is recommended to ensure exclusivity, compliance, and long-term brand integrity.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Costs vary significantly based on complexity, materials, and certification requirements (e.g., CE, ASME, ISO). The following breakdown assumes a medium-complexity industrial control panel (typical EPC component):
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55–65% | Includes steel enclosures, circuit breakers, PLCs, wiring, HMI screens |
| Labor | 15–20% | Skilled assembly, wiring, testing (avg. $4–6/hour in Guangdong) |
| Packaging | 5–8% | Export-grade wooden crates, moisture protection, labeling |
| Testing & Certification | 10–12% | Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT), compliance documentation |
| Logistics (to FOB Port) | 5% | Internal transport, port handling |
Total Landed Cost Note: Add 12–18% for shipping, import duties, and inland freight to destination market.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China)
The table below reflects average unit pricing for a standard industrial control panel (IP55 rated, 400V, 3-phase, PLC-integrated). Prices assume private label OEM production with customer-supplied design.
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Avg. Lead Time | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1,850 – $2,200 | 10–12 weeks | Higher per-unit cost; design validation included |
| 1,000 units | $1,600 – $1,850 | 12–14 weeks | Economies of scale begin; 12% avg. cost reduction |
| 5,000 units | $1,300 – $1,500 | 16–20 weeks | Volume discounts; possible tooling amortization |
Customization Impact: Add 8–15% for ODM design services or non-standard certifications (e.g., ATEX, UL).
Strategic Recommendations
-
Prioritize Private Label Agreements
Ensure exclusivity and protect market positioning, especially for engineered systems. -
Leverage Hybrid ODM/OEM Models
Engage EPC partners for design validation and DFM (Design for Manufacturing) input to reduce long-term costs. -
Negotiate Tiered MOQs
Start with 500–1,000 units to validate quality, then scale with volume commitments for better pricing. -
Audit for Compliance & IP Protection
Verify ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and GB/T certifications. Use NDAs and clear IP clauses in contracts. -
Factor in Total Landed Cost
Include sea freight, insurance, customs, and warehousing when comparing quotes.
Conclusion
Chinese EPC companies present a strategic opportunity for global procurement managers seeking high-capacity, technically proficient OEM/ODM partners. By understanding the distinctions between white label and private label models, and leveraging volume-based pricing, organizations can achieve significant cost efficiency without compromising quality. As of 2026, the integration of digital twin modeling and smart factory systems in Chinese EPC firms further enhances transparency, traceability, and production reliability.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with On-the-Ground Intelligence in China
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report
Verifying Chinese Manufacturers for Electronics Product Companies (EPCs): Critical Path to Risk Mitigation
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
With 58% of global electronics procurement managers reporting supply chain disruptions due to misidentified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Index), rigorous manufacturer verification is non-negotiable. This report details actionable, field-tested protocols to distinguish legitimate factories from trading companies, identify critical red flags, and implement a 3-tier verification framework. Key 2026 shift: AI-driven document authentication now reduces verification timelines by 65% versus manual checks.
Critical Verification Steps: The 3D Framework (Document > Digital > Physical)
| Verification Tier | Critical Actions | 2026 Best Practice | Validation Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Document (D1) | • Demand Business License (营业执照) with actual manufacturing scope (e.g., “生产” not “贸易”) • Verify Export License (对外贸易经营者备案登记表) • Cross-check Tax Registration & Social Security Records |
Use AI tools (e.g., ChinaGovVerify AI) to scan license QR codes against State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database in real-time | SAMR Public Portal |
| Digital (D2) | • Analyze factory footprint via satellite imagery (Google Earth Pro) • Scrutinize production equipment videos (no stock footage) • Validate employee count via LinkedIn/WeChat workbench |
Require 360° live drone footage of production floor during operating hours; reject pre-recorded videos | Baidu Maps API + SourcifyScan authenticity checker |
| Physical (D3) | • Unannounced onsite audit by 3rd-party inspector • Trace raw material sourcing (visit supplier warehouses) • Confirm R&D lab access (for EPC tech validation) |
Deploy IoT sensors during audit to verify machine uptime (vs. claimed capacity) | Intertek/SGS + SourcifyChina Audit Suite |
💡 Pro Tip: 73% of fraudulent suppliers fail D2 verification (SourcifyChina Audit Database 2025). Always demand real-time video of CNC machines in operation – not assembly lines.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Matrix
| Indicator | Legitimate Factory | Trading Company (Disguised) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists specific manufacturing processes (e.g., “PCBA生产”) | Lists “goods trading” or “import/export agency” | Cross-reference with SAMR database (D1) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + material cost breakdown | Quotes EXW only (hides supplier markup) | Demand granular BOM cost analysis |
| Facility Evidence | Shows raw material storage & waste treatment | Only displays showroom/sample room | Request video of warehouse during D2 phase |
| Engineering Access | Direct contact with process engineers (not sales) | “Engineers” unavailable without sales team present | Schedule unscheduled tech discussion (D3) |
| Payment Terms | Accepts LC at sight or TT after inspection | Demands 100% advance payment | Insist on 30% deposit + 70% against shipping docs |
⚠️ Critical Insight: 41% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies (SourcifyChina Platform Audit 2025). If they can’t show their own CNC machine maintenance logs, walk away.
Top 5 Red Flags in 2026 (Beyond Basic Checks)
- “Certification Overload”
- ❌ Red Flag: Claims 20+ certifications (ISO, CE, FCC) but lacks CNAS-accredited lab reports for your specific product
-
✅ Action: Demand test reports from China National Accreditation Service (CNAS) with QR code verification
-
Virtual Address Syndrome
- ❌ Red Flag: Factory address matches a shared industrial park (e.g., “Bao’an District, Shenzhen”) with no unit number
-
✅ Action: Use Baidu Maps Street View to confirm gate signage matches business license
-
Reference Reluctance
- ❌ Red Flag: Provides only email references (no direct contact) or references from non-EPC sectors
-
✅ Action: Require 3 verifiable EPC client contacts with purchase order numbers for cross-check
-
AI-Generated Facility Footage
- ❌ Red Flag: “Factory tour” videos show identical background machinery across multiple suppliers
-
✅ Action: Freeze-frame video to check for watermark mismatches or inconsistent lighting (tool: SourcifyDeepScan)
-
Regulatory Avoidance
- ❌ Red Flag: Refuses to register under China’s Foreign Investment Law for EPC collaborations
- ✅ Action: Require proof of FDI备案 (Foreign Investment Record) for joint ventures
Strategic Recommendation: The SourcifyChina Verification Protocol
“Trust but verify at machine level” remains the 2026 mantra. Implement this sequence:
1. Pre-Screen: AI document validation (D1) – eliminates 68% of fraudulent leads
2. Digital Audit: Real-time production floor verification (D2) – confirms operational capacity
3. Risk-Weighted Onsite: Unannounced audit focused on your product line (D3) – exposes hidden subcontractingWhy this works: EPC supply chains require traceability from silicon wafer to finished unit. Trading companies inherently lack visibility into raw material sourcing – creating single-point failure risks (per SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Resilience Study).
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Independent verification partner to 300+ global EPCs since 2012 | Data sourced from 12,000+ China factory audits
www.sourcifychina.com/verification-protocol | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for procurement executive use.
✉️ Next Step: Request our 2026 EPC Supplier Scorecard (free for procurement managers) – quantifies factory readiness across 47 risk parameters. [Download Here]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your Supply Chain with Verified EPC Partners in China
In today’s fast-paced global market, sourcing reliable Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) companies in China is critical for project success—yet fraught with risks. From inconsistent quality and communication gaps to extended vetting cycles, unverified suppliers can lead to cost overruns, delays, and reputational damage.
SourcifyChina introduces the 2026 Verified Pro List: EPC Companies in China—a rigorously curated, up-to-date directory of pre-vetted EPC providers with proven track records in international project delivery.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Credentials | Eliminates 40+ hours of supplier verification per project; all companies verified for business license, project portfolio, and export experience. |
| Performance History | Access to documented case studies, client references, and on-site audit reports—accelerating due diligence. |
| Direct Communication Channels | Each listing includes verified English-speaking contacts, reducing miscommunication and response delays. |
| Compliance & Standards | All EPC firms meet ISO, GB, and international safety standards—ensuring regulatory alignment. |
| Time-to-Engagement | Reduce supplier onboarding from 8–12 weeks to under 10 days. |
Result: Procurement teams using the Verified Pro List report a 65% reduction in sourcing cycle time and a 40% lower incidence of project delays due to supplier underperformance.
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Advantage Today
In 2026, speed, reliability, and compliance are non-negotiable. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted EPC partners—so you can focus on project execution, not supplier risk.
Don’t navigate China’s complex EPC landscape alone.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our consultants will provide:
– A complimentary sample of the Verified Pro List
– A free 30-minute sourcing strategy session
– Custom shortlisting based on your project scope, budget, and technical requirements
Act Now—Optimize Your 2026 Procurement Pipeline with Confidence.
Trusted by Fortune 500 firms, infrastructure developers, and renewable energy leaders worldwide.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China’s Industrial Supply Chain.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
