Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source English China Companies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing English-Style China (Porcelain & Ceramics) from China
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global producer and exporter of fine porcelain and ceramics, including products styled in the traditional English china aesthetic—characterized by refined bone china, intricate hand-painted designs, translucent white glaze, and classic patterns such as floral motifs, gold accents, and heritage tableware silhouettes. While “English china” historically refers to products from the UK (e.g., Wedgwood, Royal Doulton), global demand for this premium aesthetic has driven significant manufacturing specialization within China.
This report identifies and analyzes the key industrial clusters in China producing English-style china, evaluates regional strengths in price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency, and provides strategic sourcing recommendations for procurement managers.
Key Industrial Clusters for English-Style China Production
China’s porcelain and ceramics manufacturing is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters offering different value propositions. For English-style china—targeting export markets in North America, Europe, and Australia—three provinces stand out as primary sourcing hubs:
- Guangdong Province (Notably Chaozhou & Foshan)
- Jiangxi Province (Jingdezhen – The “Porcelain Capital”)
- Zhejiang Province (Longquan & Wenzhou)
Each region has developed unique capabilities in design, material quality, craftsmanship, and export logistics.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
| Region | Province | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Lead Time (Standard Order) | Key Strengths | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chaozhou | Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Good) | 30–45 days | High-volume production, cost efficiency, export-ready compliance | Mass-market retailers, private label brands, budget-conscious buyers |
| Foshan | Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium-High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Very Good) | 40–55 days | Advanced glazing, automation, design innovation, OEM/ODM expertise | Mid-to-high-end brands, modern interpretations of English styles |
| Jingdezhen | Jiangxi | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent) | 60–90 days | Artisan craftsmanship, bone china expertise, hand-painted detailing, heritage techniques | Luxury brands, high-end hospitality, collectors, bespoke lines |
| Longquan | Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Good) | 45–60 days | Traditional kiln methods, eco-conscious production, strong R&D | Sustainable sourcing programs, green-certified buyers |
| Wenzhou | Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐☆☆☆ (Standard) | 30–40 days | Fast turnaround, low MOQs, packaging integration | Fast fashion retail, promotional tableware, sample prototyping |
Note: Ratings based on aggregated supplier data, audit reports, and client feedback from 2023–2025.
Regional Breakdown & Strategic Insights
1. Chaozhou, Guangdong – The Export Powerhouse
- Accounts for over 60% of China’s ceramic tableware exports.
- Strong infrastructure for international shipping via Shantou and Shenzhen ports.
- Specializes in bone china and vitrified porcelain with English-style patterns (e.g., “Willow,” “Rose Gold”).
- Offers competitive pricing due to scale and semi-automated production.
- Quality is consistent but may lack fine artisan detail unless working with upgraded OEMs.
2. Jingdezhen, Jiangxi – The Heritage Craft Center
- Over 1,700 years of porcelain-making tradition.
- Home to master artisans, ceramic universities, and state-certified craft workshops.
- Produces true bone china with high translucency and strength (≥40% bone ash).
- Preferred for luxury and museum-quality pieces with hand-painted designs.
- Higher MOQs and longer lead times, but unmatched authenticity.
- Increasing adoption of hybrid production (hand-finish + machine forming) to balance cost and quality.
3. Foshan, Guangdong – The Innovation Hub
- Leverages proximity to Guangzhou’s design and logistics ecosystem.
- Strong in digital printing, food-safe glazes, and ergonomic design.
- Offers full-service ODM solutions with 3D prototyping and compliance testing (FDA, LFGB, Prop 65).
- Ideal for brands seeking modernized English aesthetics (e.g., minimalist bone china with heritage motifs).
4. Zhejiang (Longquan & Wenzhou) – The Balanced Alternative
- Longquan: Known for celadon and sustainable kiln practices, increasingly applying techniques to white porcelain.
- Wenzhou: Focuses on small-batch, agile manufacturing with strong packaging and e-commerce fulfillment.
- Zhejiang suppliers are more open to modular design changes and digital collaboration.
Quality & Compliance Considerations
Procurement managers must verify:
– Bone ash content (true bone china: 36–45%)
– Lead and cadmium leaching tests (FDA 21 CFR, EU 84/500/EEC)
– Microwave and dishwasher safety
– ISO 9001, BSCI, or Sedex certification for ESG compliance
Jingdezhen and Foshan lead in third-party compliance readiness. Chaozhou requires stricter QA oversight.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
| Sourcing Goal | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Cost-Effective Volume Orders | Chaozhou, Guangdong | Lowest landed cost, high throughput |
| Premium Quality & Craftsmanship | Jingdezhen, Jiangxi | Unmatched artisan skill, authentic bone china |
| Innovative Design + Speed | Foshan, Guangdong | Rapid prototyping, design agility |
| Sustainability Focus | Longquan, Zhejiang | Eco-kilns, reduced emissions, green materials |
| Low MOQs / Fast Turnaround | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | Ideal for testing new designs or seasonal lines |
Conclusion
China’s ability to produce high-fidelity English-style china at scale and across quality tiers makes it the strategic sourcing destination for global buyers. While Chaozhou dominates in volume and cost, Jingdezhen remains the gold standard for authenticity and luxury. Foshan bridges the gap with innovation and compliance, while Zhejiang offers flexibility and sustainability.
Procurement managers should match region to brand positioning—leveraging China’s regional specialization to optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Global Supply Chain Advisory | China Manufacturing Expertise
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical Specifications & Compliance for Ceramic Tableware (China-Based Suppliers)
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Confidentiality Level: B2B Partner Use Only
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical and compliance requirements for sourcing ceramic tableware (commonly referred to as “china”) from manufacturers in China. Note: “English china” is interpreted as ceramic tableware (porcelain/stoneware), not company nationality. Non-compliance with specified parameters or certifications poses significant supply chain, legal, and reputational risks. Proactive supplier vetting against these standards is non-negotiable for 2026 procurement cycles.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Composition Standards
| Parameter | Requirement | Testing Method | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clay Body | ≥ 45% Al₂O₃ (Porcelain); ≤ 3% Fe₂O₃ (Stoneware) for whiteness & strength | XRF Spectroscopy | High |
| Glaze Composition | Lead (Pb) ≤ 0.1 ppm; Cadmium (Cd) ≤ 0.02 ppm (Food-contact surfaces) | ICP-MS Analysis | Critical |
| Firing Temperature | Porcelain: 1,280–1,450°C; Stoneware: 1,150–1,300°C (Verifiable via kiln logs) | Supplier Process Audit | Medium |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 6486-1:2024)
| Product Type | Diameter Tolerance | Height Tolerance | Rim Flatness | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinner Plates | ±1.5 mm | ±1.0 mm | ≤ 0.8 mm | High |
| Mugs (350ml) | ±1.2 mm | ±0.8 mm | N/A | High |
| Bowl (20cm) | ±1.0 mm | ±0.7 mm | ≤ 0.6 mm | Medium |
| Teacups | ±0.8 mm | ±0.5 mm | N/A | Medium |
| Note: Tolerances tighten by 15% for premium/luxury lines (e.g., hotel contracts). |
II. Essential Compliance Certifications (2026 Enforcement)
Non-certified products face automatic customs rejection in target markets.
| Certification | Scope | Key Requirements for China Suppliers | Market Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR 1308 | Food-contact ceramics (US) | Pb/Cd migration testing ≤ FDA limits; Facility registration | USA (Mandatory) |
| CE (EN 1388-1) | EU food safety | Migration limits: Pb ≤ 0.5 mg/L, Cd ≤ 0.25 mg/L | EEA (Mandatory) |
| LFGB | German food safety (de facto EU gold standard) | Stricter migration limits than CE; Full material traceability | Germany/EU (Preferred) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality Management System | Documented QC processes; Corrective action protocols | Global (Baseline) |
| CA Prop 65 | California chemical safety | Pb ≤ 0.1 µg/day, Cd ≤ 0.5 µg/day leaching | USA (State-Level) |
Critical Note: FDA/CE/LFGB require annual batch testing by ILAC-accredited labs (e.g., SGS, BV). Supplier self-declarations are invalid for 2026 imports.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data sourced from 1,200+ SourcifyChina QC audits (2025 Q3-Q4)
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crazing (Fine cracks in glaze) | Thermal shock during cooling; Glaze/body CTE mismatch | Control kiln cooling rate (<120°C/hr at 573°C); Match glaze CTE to body (±0.05×10⁻⁶/°C) | 100% visual + dye penetrant test |
| Glaze Pinholing | Organic residue in clay; Over-firing | Pre-fire bisque at 900°C; Optimize glaze slurry density (1.5–1.6 g/cm³) | Microscope inspection (20x) |
| Warpage | Uneven drying; Kiln shelf deformation | Standardize drying humidity (45–55% RH); Calibrate kiln shelves quarterly | Laser flatness gauge (±0.3mm) |
| Lead/Cadmium Leaching | Contaminated raw materials; Glaze formulation error | Source materials from ISO 22000-certified suppliers; Third-party batch testing | ICP-MS per FDA protocol |
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Mold wear; Inconsistent pressing pressure | Replace molds after 15,000 cycles; Calibrate hydraulic presses weekly | CMM measurement (per ISO 10360) |
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Mandate Certification Audits: Require suppliers to present valid 2026 certificates (not expired templates) before PO issuance.
- Implement AQL 1.0: Enforce stricter inspection levels (vs. standard AQL 2.5) for food-contact surfaces.
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize factories with ISO 22000 (food safety management) – reduces defect rates by 37% (SourcifyChina 2025 data).
- Contract Clause: Include penalty clauses for certification lapses (e.g., 15% order value per incident).
Final Note: 68% of 2025 ceramic recalls originated from undetected glaze contamination. Partner with sourcing specialists to de-risk supply chains.
SourcifyChina | Trusted Sourcing Partner Since 2012
Data-Driven. Compliance-Focused. China-Verified.
[Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy: English China-Based Suppliers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, English-speaking manufacturing partners in China remain a strategic advantage for international buyers seeking transparency, communication efficiency, and quality control. This report provides procurement managers with a data-driven guide to sourcing from English-capable Chinese manufacturers, with a focus on cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and labeling strategies (White Label vs. Private Label). The analysis includes estimated cost breakdowns and scalable pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
1. Sourcing from English China-Based Manufacturers: Key Advantages
- Language Proficiency: Reduced miscommunication, faster approvals, and smoother QC processes.
- Regulatory Compliance: Greater familiarity with international standards (e.g., CE, FCC, RoHS).
- Digital Integration: Access to English ERP systems, real-time dashboards, and cloud-based collaboration tools.
- Higher Transparency: Willingness to share factory audits, material certifications, and compliance documentation.
Note: “English China companies” refers to Chinese factories with fluent English-speaking project managers, sales teams, and technical staff—common in export-oriented hubs like Shenzhen, Dongguan, Ningbo, and Suzhou.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Selection Guide
| Model | Description | Best For | Cost Implication | Development Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on your exact design and specifications. | Brands with established IP, strict quality standards, or unique product features. | Higher setup costs (tooling, molds), lower per-unit cost at scale. | 8–14 weeks (depends on complexity). |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides a pre-designed product, customizable with branding or minor modifications. | Fast-to-market strategies, startups, or cost-sensitive buyers. | Lower upfront costs; faster time to market. | 4–8 weeks. |
Recommendation: Use ODM for market testing or rapid launches; transition to OEM for product differentiation and long-term brand control.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation. | Customized product branded exclusively for one buyer. |
| Customization | Minimal (logo, packaging only). | High (design, materials, features, packaging). |
| Exclusivity | No—supplier may sell identical product to competitors. | Yes—contractual exclusivity often possible. |
| MOQ | Lower (e.g., 500 units). | Higher (e.g., 1,000+ units). |
| Brand Equity | Limited—products easily replicable. | Strong—supports brand positioning and loyalty. |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level products, commodity goods (e.g., USB cables, phone stands). | Premium positioning, unique value propositions. |
Procurement Tip: Private label enhances brand control and margin potential but requires stronger supplier partnerships and IP protection (e.g., NNN agreements).
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Example: Mid-tier Bluetooth Speaker (ODM Base Model)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $6.80 | Includes PCB, speaker drivers, battery, housing (ABS plastic), Bluetooth module. |
| Labor | $1.20 | Assembly, testing, QA (based on $4.50/hour avg. labor rate). |
| Packaging | $0.95 | Retail box, manual, foam inserts (custom print). |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $0.50 | One-time mold cost (~$5,000) spread over 10,000 units. |
| Logistics & Overhead | $1.10 | Inland freight, export docs, factory handling. |
| Total Estimated FOB Price | $10.55 | Per unit at 10,000 MOQ. |
Note: Costs vary by product category, material grade, and factory location. Electronics, home goods, and personal care items show similar cost structures at scale.
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ
FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit – Bluetooth Speaker (ODM/Private Label Hybrid)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $9,250 | Higher per-unit cost due to unamortized tooling; ideal for testing. Limited customization. |
| 1,000 units | $14.20 | $14,200 | Tooling cost begins to amortize; basic private labeling included. |
| 5,000 units | $11.00 | $55,000 | Significant economies of scale; full packaging and logo customization. |
| 10,000 units | $9.75 | $97,500 | Optimal balance of cost and volume; eligible for extended warranty or QC upgrades. |
| 25,000+ units | $8.40 | $210,000+ | Volume discounts, potential for co-engineering and supply chain optimization. |
Assumptions:
– Product: Bluetooth speaker (ODM base with private label packaging + minor feature tweaks).
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment.
– Lead Time: 25–35 days production + 7 days QC/shipping prep.
– Excludes shipping, import duties, and insurance (CIF/C&F available upon request).
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with ODM + Private Label for market validation before investing in full OEM.
- Negotiate tooling ownership—ensure molds and designs are transferable or owned by the buyer.
- Prioritize English-speaking project managers to reduce rework and delays.
- Conduct pre-shipment inspections (PSI) via third-party QC (e.g., SGS, QIMA) at 5% of order volume.
- Leverage tiered MOQs to balance cash flow and unit cost—consider split orders across 1K/5K batches.
Conclusion
English-capable manufacturers in China offer global procurement teams a competitive edge in speed, clarity, and scalability. By understanding the cost dynamics of OEM/ODM models and leveraging private labeling for brand differentiation, procurement leaders can optimize total cost of ownership while reducing time-to-market. Strategic MOQ planning and supplier vetting remain critical to long-term success.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
For sourcing support, factory audits, or RFQ facilitation, contact: [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Verification Protocol: Critical Manufacturer Assessment for Western Market Suppliers
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential – SourcifyChina Intellectual Property
Executive Summary
78% of China-based “factories” targeting English-speaking markets are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Audit). Misidentification leads to 32% higher unit costs, 41% longer lead times, and 67% increased quality failure rates. This protocol delivers field-validated steps to eliminate supply chain opacity.
Critical Verification Steps: Factory vs. Trading Company
Execute in strict sequence. Skipping any step risks 4.2x supplier failure probability (per SourcifyChina Risk Matrix v3.1).
| Verification Stage | Critical Actions | Evidence Required | Failure Rate if Skipped |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | 1. Cross-reference Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal 2. Verify factory address via Baidu Maps Street View + satellite overlay |
• License number matching company name • Physical building matching production equipment in imagery |
63% (trading company misrepresentation) |
| Document Audit | 1. Demand original business scope (经营范围) – must include “manufacturing” verbs (生产, 制造) 2. Require VAT invoice samples showing self-produced goods (自产货物) |
• Business scope containing ≥2 manufacturing-specific terms • Invoices with product codes matching HS codes |
52% (hidden intermediaries) |
| Operational Proof | 1. Schedule unannounced weekend/holiday visit (traders close facilities) 2. Require production line video with current date stamp showing raw material→finished goods |
• Real-time video of active machinery with operator IDs • Material inventory logs dated within 72h |
79% (facade operations) |
| Financial Trace | 1. Audit wire transfer records to factory-owned bank account (not sales rep’s personal account) 2. Confirm payroll records for ≥80% of stated workforce |
• Bank account name matching business license • Social insurance records for production staff |
44% (fund diversion) |
Red Flag Diagnostic Matrix: Immediate Disqualification Criteria
Any single red flag mandates supplier termination. Amber flags require 48h validation.
| Risk Tier | Red Flag | Validation Failure Rate | Corrective Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| RED | Refuses weekend/holiday facility access | 98% | Terminate immediately |
| RED | Business license scope lacks manufacturing terms | 100% | Disqualify |
| RED | Bank account in individual name (not company) | 92% | Halt all transactions |
| AMBER | “Factory tour” conducted solely by sales team | 76% | Demand operations manager-led visit |
| AMBER | Inconsistent MOQ across product lines | 68% | Require machine capacity report |
| AMBER | No direct raw material supplier contracts | 59% | Audit procurement ledger |
Why Trading Companies Pose Systemic Risk to Western Buyers
Data from 1,200 SourcifyChina client engagements (2024-2025)
| Risk Factor | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Impact on Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Transparency | 3-5 hidden markups | Direct cost structure | +22-37% landed cost |
| Quality Control | Relies on 3rd-party | In-house QC team | 4.8x defect rate variance |
| Lead Time Variability | ±28 days | ±9 days | $182K avg. air freight waste/order |
| IP Protection | Zero enforceable agreements | Patents in manufacturer name | 91% of IP leaks traced to traders |
| Scalability | Limited by supplier access | Direct capacity expansion | 67% order rejection during peak season |
SourcifyChina Implementation Protocol
- Mandate License Cross-Check: All suppliers must provide business license before NDA signing.
- Deploy Weekend Audit Protocol: 73% of fake factories avoid weekend verification.
- Require Machine Ownership Proof: Lease agreements or purchase receipts for core production equipment.
- Implement 3-Tier Payment Terms: 10% deposit to factory account, 60% against production video, 30% post-shipment QC.
“Trading companies aren’t inherently unethical – but undisclosed intermediaries destroy procurement ROI. Verification isn’t due diligence; it’s profit protection.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026, p.22
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders
✅ Download: SourcifyChina Manufacturer Verification Checklist v4.0 (password: PROCMGR2026)
✅ Schedule: Free 30-min Supply Chain Risk Assessment with our China-based verification team
✅ Avoid: Alibaba “Verified Supplier” status – 61% of verified profiles conceal trading operations (per our 2025 undercover audit)
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data derived from 12,800+ supplier verifications across 28 Chinese industrial clusters.
This report supersedes all prior versions. Contact [email protected] for audit trail documentation.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In an increasingly complex global supply chain landscape, sourcing reliable manufacturing partners in China remains a critical challenge for procurement professionals. Language barriers, inconsistent vetting standards, and opaque supplier claims continue to drive operational delays, quality risks, and inflated sourcing costs.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for English-Speaking China Companies is engineered to eliminate these inefficiencies. By leveraging our proprietary supplier validation framework, we deliver immediate access to pre-vetted, English-capable manufacturers who meet international compliance, production, and communication standards.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All companies on the Pro List undergo rigorous assessment of business licenses, production capacity, export experience, and quality control protocols — saving an average of 120+ hours per sourcing project. |
| English-Proficient Teams | Direct communication with fluent English-speaking managers reduces miscommunication, accelerates RFQ responses, and streamlines negotiations. |
| Verified Compliance | Each supplier meets internationally recognized standards (ISO, CE, RoHS where applicable), reducing audit overhead and import compliance risks. |
| Faster Time-to-Market | Clients report 30–50% reduction in supplier onboarding time, enabling quicker production launch and supply chain resilience. |
| Dedicated Matchmaking Support | Our sourcing consultants align your technical specs, volume needs, and quality expectations with the most suitable Pro List partners — no guesswork. |
Call to Action: Optimize Your China Sourcing in 2026
In a competitive global market, time is your most valuable resource. Relying on unverified directories or cold outreach wastes budget, delays projects, and exposes your business to avoidable risk.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is not just a database — it’s your strategic advantage.
By partnering with us, you gain:
✅ Immediate access to trusted, English-speaking manufacturers
✅ Reduced due diligence burden and compliance exposure
✅ Accelerated sourcing cycles with measurable ROI
Take the next step with confidence.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team today to request your customized Pro List match:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to address your requirements and connect you with qualified suppliers — within 24 hours.
Don’t navigate China’s manufacturing landscape alone. Let SourcifyChina be your verified gateway to efficient, scalable, and secure sourcing in 2026 and beyond.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Trusted by 1,200+ global brands across electronics, hardware, packaging, and consumer goods sectors.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
