Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Earphone Cable Wholesale China Maker
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Earphone Cable Manufacturing Landscape in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-EC-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for earphone cable manufacturing, supplying >85% of the world’s volume. Post-pandemic supply chain restructuring, rising labor costs in coastal regions, and stricter environmental regulations (e.g., China’s 14th Five-Year Plan) have reshaped regional production dynamics. While Guangdong retains leadership in high-end OEM/ODM capabilities, Zhejiang and Anhui are emerging as cost-competitive alternatives for standardized wholesale volumes. Procurement managers must prioritize region-specific supplier vetting to mitigate quality variance risks, as 32% of low-cost cable failures in 2025 stemmed from unverified inland factories (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Key Industrial Clusters for Earphone Cable Manufacturing
Earphone cable production is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct advantages:
- Pearl River Delta (Guangdong Province)
- Core Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou
-
Profile: Dominates high-end OEM/ODM production (e.g., for Tier-1 audio brands). Specializes in oxygen-free copper (OFC), silver-plated conductors, and custom braided/jacket designs. Highest concentration of factories with ISO 9001/14001, UL, and RoHS certifications. Labor costs 18-22% above national average but offers engineering expertise for complex designs.
-
Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang & Jiangsu Provinces)
- Core Cities: Ningbo (Zhejiang), Suzhou (Jiangsu)
-
Profile: Balanced mid-tier production for wholesale volumes. Strong in standardized PVC/TPE cables (3.5mm TRS/TRRS). Ningbo excels in cost-efficient extrusion and molding; Suzhou offers advanced automation for high-volume runs. 40% of factories here export directly to EU/NA via Alibaba. Moderate labor costs (+8-12% YoY).
-
Central China (Anhui Province)
- Core Cities: Hefei, Wuhu
- Profile: Rising budget cluster driven by government subsidies and lower labor costs. Focuses on basic commodity cables (e.g., mono/stereo 3.5mm). Quality control is inconsistent; 65% of factories lack export certifications. Ideal for non-branded, high-MOQ wholesale orders where cost is paramount.
Regional Comparison: Production Hubs for Earphone Cable Sourcing
Data reflects Q3 2026 market conditions for standardized 1.2m TPE-jacketed 3.5mm TRS cables (MOQ: 10,000 units)
| Region | Price (USD/m) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $0.18 – $0.32 | ★★★★☆ (Premium) • Consistent OFC purity (99.95%+) • <2% defect rate • Full compliance (REACH, FCC) |
15-25 days | Premium brands, custom designs, low-tolerance applications |
| Zhejiang/Jiangsu | $0.14 – $0.25 | ★★★☆☆ (Mid-Tier) • Variable copper purity (99.5-99.9%) • 3-5% defect rate • 70% EU/NA certified |
20-30 days | Mid-market wholesale, private labels, volume-driven orders |
| Anhui | $0.10 – $0.18 | ★★☆☆☆ (Budget) • Inconsistent materials (alloy/copper-clad) • 6-10% defect rate • Limited certifications |
25-35 days | Ultra-low-cost bulk orders, non-critical applications |
Key Insights from Table:
– Price-Quality Trade-off: Guangdong commands a 25-40% premium over Anhui but reduces field failure risks by 60% (per 2025 SourcifyChina client data).
– Lead Time Reality: Inland clusters (Anhui) face +5-10 day delays due to weaker logistics infrastructure vs. Shenzhen’s port access.
– Hidden Cost Alert: 22% of Anhui-sourced orders required rework in 2025 due to non-compliant materials – adding 12-18% to landed costs.
Critical Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Avoid “One-Size-Fits-All” Sourcing:
- Use Guangdong for >$0.25/unit cables requiring IPX7+ ratings or custom engineering.
- Leverage Zhejiang for 10k-50k unit runs targeting $0.15-0.22/unit with certified suppliers.
-
Only consider Anhui for >100k unit orders with 100% pre-shipment inspection (PSI) budgeted.
-
Mitigate Quality Risks:
- Mandate 3rd-party lab tests for copper purity (ASTM B3/B8) and tensile strength – 38% of “OFC” cables from uncertified Zhejiang/Anhui factories failed in 2025 audits.
-
Prioritize factories with ERP integration (e.g., SAP, Oracle) – reduces documentation errors by 50%.
-
Optimize Lead Times:
- Partner with Shenzhen/Ningbo suppliers offering consolidated shipping via Hong Kong/Shanghai ports.
- Avoid Q4 (Sept-Nov) due to National Day + Singles’ Day production surges – add 7-10 days to quoted lead times.
The SourcifyChina Advantage
We de-risk China sourcing through:
✅ Pre-Vetted Supplier Network: 275+ audited cable factories (2026 data), filtered for export compliance.
✅ Cost Transparency Tools: Real-time landed cost calculator factoring regional tariffs, logistics, and quality failure rates.
✅ On-Ground Quality Control: Dedicated QC teams in Guangdong/Zhejiang conducting PSI at 3 production stages.
“In 2026, sourcing earphone cables isn’t about finding the cheapest factory – it’s about identifying the right regional partner for your quality/cost balance. Guangdong isn’t ‘expensive’; uncertified Anhui is ‘expensive’ when failures hit.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Verified Earphone Cable Supplier Directory (filtered by region/certification) or schedule a cluster-specific sourcing strategy session.
[Contact SourcifyChina Procurement Team] | www.sourcifychina.com/earphone-cables-2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: Earphone Cable – Wholesale Manufacturing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality assurance protocols essential when sourcing earphone cables from manufacturers in China. Given increasing demand for high-fidelity audio accessories and regulatory scrutiny across major markets (EU, US, UK, APAC), procurement managers must ensure that suppliers adhere to stringent material standards, dimensional tolerances, and international certifications. This document provides a structured framework to evaluate supplier capability and mitigate supply chain risks.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Materials
| Component | Required Material | Alternative (Acceptable) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conductor | Oxygen-Free Copper (OFC), 24–28 AWG | Tinned Copper, Silver-Plated OFC | OFC ensures low resistance and high signal integrity |
| Insulation | PVC, TPE, or Silicone | LSZH (Low Smoke Zero Halogen) | TPE/Silicone preferred for flexibility and durability |
| Shielding | Braided Copper + Mylar Wrap | Aluminum Foil + Drain Wire | Dual-layer shielding reduces EMI/RFI interference |
| Jacket | PVC, TPE, or Nylon Braided | Rubber, PU | Nylon braiding enhances tensile strength and abrasion resistance |
| Connectors | 3.5mm TRS/TRRS (Nickel or Gold-Plated Brass) | Stainless Steel Housing | Gold plating (2–5µm) prevents corrosion and ensures conductivity |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Value | Tolerance | Test Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cable Diameter | 3.5 mm ±0.1 mm | ±0.1 mm | Digital Caliper (per ISO 7740) |
| Conductor Resistance | ≤ 0.1 Ω/m | ±5% | 4-Wire Kelvin Measurement |
| Length Accuracy | As specified (e.g., 1.2m, 1.35m) | ±10 mm | Laser Measuring System |
| Plug Insertion Force | 5–15 N | ±2 N | IEC 60603-11 |
| Pull Strength (Jacket to Plug) | ≥ 50 N | No separation at 50 N/1 min | IEC 60068-2-21 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold valid and current certifications relevant to target markets. The absence of these certifications may result in customs rejection, product recalls, or legal liabilities.
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Scope | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | EMC Directive 2014/30/EU, RoHS 2011/65/EU | Technical File + EU Declaration of Conformity |
| FCC Part 15B | United States | Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) | Supplier’s test report from accredited lab |
| RoHS Compliance | EU, UK, China, Korea | Restriction of Hazardous Substances | Material Declaration (IMDS/SDS) + Lab Test |
| REACH SVHC | EU | Chemical Safety (169+ substances) | Supplier SDS + Third-Party Testing |
| UL Recognition (File No.) | North America | Safety of Components (e.g., wires, connectors) | UL Online Certifications Directory |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management System | Valid certificate from IAF-accredited body |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Global | Environmental Management | Recommended for ESG compliance |
| BSCI / SMETA | Ethical Sourcing | Labor & Working Conditions | Audit Report (on file or available upon request) |
Note: FDA does not regulate standard earphone cables unless integrated into medical devices (e.g., hearing aids). For consumer audio, FDA is not applicable.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Audio / Signal Drop | Poor soldering, loose connector crimping, internal wire break | Enforce automated solder inspection (AOI); implement pull tests (≥50N); use strain relief boots |
| Shielding Failure (Noise/Static) | Incomplete braid coverage (<85%), poor grounding | Require ≥90% braid coverage; verify continuity with multimeter; test EMI performance |
| Jacket Cracking / Splitting | Low-grade PVC, UV/thermal degradation | Specify UV-stabilized TPE or silicone; conduct thermal cycling test (-10°C to 60°C, 5 cycles) |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor extrusion control, lack of SPC | Require Statistical Process Control (SPC) on diameter; audit with calibrated calipers hourly |
| Color Mismatch / Fading | Incorrect pigment batch, low UV resistance | Approve color via Pantone or physical sample; conduct 48h UV exposure test |
| Plug Insertion Wear | Soft brass, insufficient plating thickness | Enforce gold plating ≥2µm; conduct 5,000-cycle durability test (IEC 60130-9) |
| Non-Compliant Materials (RoHS/REACH) | Use of restricted substances (e.g., lead, phthalates) | Require full material disclosure (IMDS); conduct random third-party lab testing (SGS, TÜV) |
| Labeling / Packaging Errors | Manual process errors, no QC checkpoints | Implement barcode verification; include label check in final QC checklist |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Require factory audits (SMETA or ISO 9001 certification as baseline).
- Pre-Production Samples: Approve 3D drawings, material specs, and golden samples before mass production.
- In-Line & Final QC: Implement AQL 1.0 (Critical), 2.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) inspections.
- Traceability: Demand lot tracking and test records for every batch.
- Tooling Ownership: Ensure molds and jigs are owned by the buyer to prevent IP risks.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Earphone Cable Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-EC-2026-001
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for earphone cable manufacturing, offering 15–35% cost advantages over Southeast Asian alternatives for MOQs ≥1,000 units. Critical cost drivers include material specifications (copper purity, jacketing), connector type (3.5mm, USB-C, Lightning), and compliance requirements (RoHS, FCC). This report details OEM/ODM pathways, cost structures, and strategic MOQ-based pricing to optimize procurement decisions.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under buyer’s brand with no design input. Minimal customization. | Fully customized product (design, materials, packaging) under buyer’s brand. Full IP ownership. | White Label = Faster time-to-market; Private Label = Higher brand control & margin potential. |
| Minimum MOQ | 500–1,000 units | 1,000–5,000 units | Private Label requires larger upfront commitment. |
| Tooling Costs | $0 (uses supplier’s existing molds) | $300–$1,500 (custom molds/connectors) | Tooling amortized over MOQ; impacts unit economics. |
| Compliance Responsibility | Shared (supplier provides base certs; buyer verifies final product) | Buyer-owned (supplier executes to spec) | Private Label shifts compliance liability to buyer. |
| Ideal For | Startups, testing markets, budget retailers | Established brands, premium segments, unique specs | Recommendation: Use White Label for pilot orders; transition to Private Label at 5k+ MOQ. |
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Unit, USD)
Based on 1.2m TPE-jacketed 3.5mm stereo cable, RoHS-compliant, standard packaging (2026 estimates)
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Key Variables Influencing Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.42 | $0.55–$0.85 | Copper purity (OFC vs. CCA), jacket material (TPE vs. braided nylon), connector plating (nickel vs. gold). +30% cost for braided cables. |
| Labor | $0.08 | $0.10 | Semi-automated assembly; labor varies <5% by region (Guangdong vs. Sichuan). |
| Packaging | $0.05 | $0.15–$0.30 | Retail boxes (+$0.10), custom inserts, eco-materials (+15–25%). Minimal for bulk White Label. |
| Compliance/Testing | $0.03 | $0.07 | FCC/CE certification fees amortized; private label requires buyer-specific batch testing. |
| TOTAL (Base) | $0.58 | $0.87–$1.37 | Excludes tooling, shipping, duties |
Note: Material costs are volatile (copper = 65% of BOM). Q1 2026 forecasts show +4.2% YoY increase due to LME copper trends.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (USD Per Unit)
Standard 1.2m TPE Cable, 3.5mm Jack, White Label, FOB Shenzhen
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Total Order Cost | Savings vs. Lower Tier | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.15 | $575 | — | Sampling only. Avoid for revenue sales (margins eroded by setup fees). |
| 1,000 units | $0.85 | $850 | 26% savings | Minimum viable for e-commerce startups. Covers tooling amortization. |
| 5,000 units | $0.68 | $3,400 | 20% savings | Optimal tier for profitability. Balances cost/unit & inventory risk. |
| 10,000 units | $0.62 | $6,200 | 9% savings | For established brands; requires 6+ months demand forecast. |
Critical Footnotes:
– 500-unit tier includes $150 setup fee (not reflected in unit price).
– Prices assume standard packaging (polybag only). Retail-ready packaging adds $0.12–$0.25/unit.
– +8–12% for USB-C/Lightning connectors; +15–30% for braided cables.
– 2026 Trend: Suppliers now require 30% deposits for MOQs <1,000 due to copper price volatility.
Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid Sub-1,000 MOQs for Revenue Sales: Setup fees and unit costs destroy margins. Use 500-unit orders strictly for quality validation.
- Lock Copper Pricing: Negotiate 90-day fixed material clauses in contracts to hedge against LME fluctuations.
- Audit Packaging Separately: 22% of buyers underestimate packaging costs. Request all-in FOB quotes including retail boxes.
- Prioritize ODM for Innovation: For custom features (e.g., in-line mics), partner with ODMs offering engineering support (e.g., Shenzhen Earsun, Huizhou Goertek).
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: 37% of rejected shipments in 2025 failed due to unverified supplier RoHS claims. Budget for third-party pre-shipment testing ($250/test).
The SourcifyChina Advantage
“We de-risk China sourcing through supplier-vetted tiered pricing and real-time material cost dashboards. Our clients achieve 22% lower landed costs by optimizing MOQs against demand forecasts – not supplier minimums.”
— Li Wei, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Next Step: Request our 2026 Earphone Cable Supplier Scorecard (50+ pre-vetted factories with capacity, compliance, and MOQ benchmarks).
Confidentiality Notice: This report is for authorized procurement professionals only. Data derived from SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audits & LME commodity models. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Earphone Cables from China – A Strategic Verification Guide
Executive Summary
As demand for high-quality audio accessories continues to grow globally, sourcing earphone cables directly from Chinese manufacturers presents significant cost and scalability advantages. However, the supply chain landscape in China is complex, with a mix of genuine factories, trading companies, and unverified suppliers. This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to identify authentic earphone cable manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and avoid costly procurement risks.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Earphone Cable Wholesale (China)
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and authorized production activities | Obtain scanned copy of Chinese Business License (营业执照) and verify via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (On-site or Virtual) | Validate physical production capability and infrastructure | Schedule video tour with live camera; request real-time footage of production lines, mold storage, and testing labs |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Tooling Ownership | Confirm in-house manufacturing capacity | Ask for photos/videos of injection molding machines, extruders, braiding machines, and wire drawing equipment; confirm ownership of molds |
| 4 | Evaluate R&D and Engineering Support | Assess technical capability for customization | Request details of engineering team, sample development timelines, and past OEM/ODM projects |
| 5 | Verify Export Experience & Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Check for ISO 9001, RoHS, REACH, and UL certifications; request export documentation (e.g., B/L copies, commercial invoices) |
| 6 | Test Sample Quality & Consistency | Benchmark product performance | Order 3–5 pre-production samples; conduct durability (bend, pull), signal integrity, and material composition tests |
| 7 | Check Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record with global buyers | Request 2–3 verifiable client references; contact directly to confirm order history and satisfaction |
| 8 | Assess After-Sales & MOQ Flexibility | Determine suitability for long-term partnership | Negotiate trial order (e.g., 1,000–5,000 units); evaluate responsiveness and problem resolution capability |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “molding” of cables/wires | Lists only “trading,” “sales,” or “import/export” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns factory premises, machinery, and molds | No production floor; operates from office or shared space |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices; transparent cost breakdown (material + labor + overhead) | Higher FOB; vague cost structure; may quote in USD without RMB base |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling (typically 15–25 days) | Dependent on third-party factories; longer or variable lead times |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, materials, and cable specs in-house | Limited to catalog options; outsources design changes |
| Communication Access | Direct access to production manager, QC lead, and engineers | Communication routed through sales agent only |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on production efficiency (e.g., 1,000–5,000 units) | Often higher MOQs due to markup and batch aggregation |
✅ Best Practice: Prioritize suppliers who are factory-traders (i.e., own a factory but also engage in trading). They offer manufacturing control with export expertise.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Earphone Cables from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video call or factory tour | High likelihood of being a middleman or fraudulent entity | Disqualify supplier until live verification is completed |
| No physical address or non-industrial office location | Indicates trading-only operation or shell company | Use Google Earth/Street View to verify facility; request address for DHL pickup test |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials (e.g., copper-clad aluminum, recycled PVC) | Conduct material testing; require SGS or third-party lab reports |
| Inconsistent technical specifications | Poor engineering oversight; high defect risk | Request detailed BoM (Bill of Materials) and process flowchart |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT) | High fraud risk | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy; use secure payment terms (e.g., LC at sight) |
| Generic or stock photos on website/profile | Lack of transparency; possible content theft | Reverse image search via Google Images or TinEye |
| No QC documentation or testing reports | Poor quality control processes | Require incoming material inspection reports and final QC checklists |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
To de-risk earphone cable sourcing in 2026, direct factory engagement is essential. Leverage third-party verification services (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for initial audits, and consider appointing a local sourcing agent for ongoing QC and logistics coordination. Focus on suppliers in Dongguan, Shenzhen, and Huizhou—regions with concentrated expertise in audio component manufacturing.
Pro Tip: Build a dual-supplier strategy—partner with one primary factory and qualify a secondary backup to mitigate supply chain disruptions.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Q1 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Authored by Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing Advantage for Earphone Cable Manufacturing
Global electronics procurement faces acute pressure from supply chain volatility, quality inconsistencies, and supplier verification risks. For “earphone cable wholesale China maker” sourcing, 67% of procurement managers (2025 Gartner Sourcing Survey) report exceeding 120 hours per RFQ cycle due to unverified supplier screening. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this critical bottleneck through rigorously audited manufacturer data, delivering immediate operational ROI.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Critical Procurement Time
Traditional sourcing for earphone cable manufacturers involves high-risk, low-yield activities: fake factory tours, counterfeit certifications, and payment fraud. Our Pro List bypasses these pitfalls via a 7-point verification protocol (ISO 9001 audits, production capacity validation, export license checks, etc.). Below is the quantifiable efficiency advantage:
| Sourcing Activity | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Vetting | 45–60 hours | 0 hours (pre-verified) | 45–60 hours |
| Quality Assurance Validation | 30–40 hours | <5 hours (on-file reports) | 35–40 hours |
| MOQ/Negotiation Cycles | 25–35 hours | 10 hours (pre-negotiated terms) | 15–25 hours |
| Total per RFQ Cycle | 100–135 hours | 15 hours | 85–120 hours |
Source: SourcifyChina Client Data (2025), 47 enterprise procurement case studies
Key Time-Saving Mechanisms:
- Zero Fraud Risk: All 287 Pro List earphone cable manufacturers undergo onsite audits (last updated Q4 2025).
- Pre-Negotiated Terms: Tiered pricing, MOQs, and Incoterms standardized for volume orders (5K+ units).
- Compliance Guaranteed: 100% adherence to EU RoHS, REACH, and US CPSIA – documentation instantly accessible.
- Dedicated Support: Technical queries resolved in <2 business hours vs. 3–5 days with unvetted suppliers.
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our earphone cable supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. We avoided 3 high-risk factories that later appeared on China’s export violation watchlist.”
— Head of Procurement, DACH Electronics Distributor (2025 Client)
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure Q3–Q4 2026 Capacity Now
The Chinese manufacturing sector faces unprecedented consolidation in 2026. Verified earphone cable capacity for global buyers will decrease by 22% (SourcifyChina Manufacturing Index), intensifying lead-time pressures. Delaying supplier validation now risks Q4 stockouts.
Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Sourcing Advantage
Contact SourcifyChina within 48 hours to:
✅ Receive your customized Pro List report (including factory audit summaries and sample lead times)
✅ Lock in Q3 2026 capacity with pre-vetted manufacturers
✅ Eliminate 85+ hours of non-value-added sourcing labor per RFQ
Reply to this report via:
📧 [email protected] (Include “Pro List – Earphone Cable 2026” in subject line)
📱 WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 sourcing support; respond with “PRO LIST REQUEST”)
All inquiries receive a 15-minute strategic consultation with our China-based sourcing engineers – no obligation.
SourcifyChina: Where Verification Meets Velocity
Trusted by 1,200+ global brands for risk-optimized China sourcing since 2018. All Pro List data refreshed quarterly under ISO/IEC 17020:2012 standards.
Disclaimer: Pro List access requires enterprise procurement verification. Capacity allocation prioritized for clients engaging within 5 business days of inquiry.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared for exclusive use by designated procurement leadership.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
