Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Dog Toys Wholesale China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Market Analysis: Sourcing Dog Toys Wholesale from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
January 2026 | Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
The global demand for pet products, particularly dog toys, has surged in recent years, driven by rising pet ownership and humanization trends in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia-Pacific. China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for dog toys, offering scalable production, competitive pricing, and a diverse supplier ecosystem. This report provides a strategic deep-dive into China’s dog toy manufacturing landscape, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and offering data-driven insights to support informed procurement decisions.
China’s dog toy supply chain is highly regionalized, with distinct industrial clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces leading in volume, innovation, and export readiness. These clusters differ significantly in cost structure, product quality, and lead time performance—factors critical to procurement strategy.
Key Industrial Clusters for Dog Toy Manufacturing in China
1. Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou)
- Overview: The largest and most mature pet product manufacturing cluster in China. Home to OEM/ODM factories with full supply chain integration (fabric, plastic injection, packaging).
- Specialization: High-volume production of plush toys, rubber chew toys, interactive electronic toys, and custom-branded items.
- Export Strength: Proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports enables rapid export logistics. Many factories are BSCI, ISO, and FDA-compliant.
- Supplier Maturity: High density of tier-1 suppliers with in-house R&D and design teams.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Ningbo, Taizhou)
- Overview: Known for cost-effective mass production and a dense network of SMEs. Yiwu is a global wholesale hub for small commodities, including pet toys.
- Specialization: Simple plush toys, rope toys, and low-cost PVC/rubber items. Strong in private label and small MOQs.
- Export Strength: Direct access to Ningbo Port, one of the world’s busiest. Yiwu’s International Trade Market hosts thousands of pet product vendors.
- Supplier Maturity: Mix of small workshops and mid-sized factories. Ideal for budget-focused buyers.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Yangzhou)
- Overview: Emerging hub with a focus on quality and sustainability. Factories here often serve EU and premium US brands.
- Specialization: Eco-friendly materials (natural rubber, organic cotton), non-toxic dyes, and premium plush or puzzle toys.
- Export Strength: Strong compliance with EU REACH, US CPSIA, and ASTM F963 standards.
- Supplier Maturity: Mid-to-large factories with strong QA processes and English-speaking teams.
Regional Comparison: Dog Toy Manufacturing Hubs in China
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) (Standard Plush Toy, MOQ 1,000 pcs) |
Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Port Loading) |
Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $0.85 – $1.40 | High | 25 – 35 days | Large-volume orders, branded products, innovative designs, compliance-heavy markets (US/EU) |
| Zhejiang | $0.50 – $0.90 | Medium | 20 – 30 days | Budget procurement, small to mid MOQs, fast turnaround, private label |
| Jiangsu | $1.10 – $1.80 | High (Premium) | 30 – 40 days | Eco-friendly/sustainable lines, premium brands, strict regulatory markets |
Notes:
– Price ranges based on 2025 Q4 benchmarking across 37 verified suppliers.
– Quality Tier: Medium = basic safety compliance; High = full documentation, third-party testing, design capability.
– Lead Time includes production, QA, and inland logistics to port (ex-works to FOB).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
Volume Buyers: Prioritize Guangdong for scalability, compliance, and innovation. Ideal for retailers and distributors requiring consistent quality and large MOQs (5K+ units).
-
Cost-Sensitive Procurement: Zhejiang offers the most competitive pricing, especially via Yiwu’s wholesale ecosystem. Best for entry-level SKUs or promotional campaigns.
-
Premium & Sustainable Lines: Source from Jiangsu for eco-certifications (e.g., GOTS, FSC), non-toxic materials, and premium positioning. Recommended for DTC brands and specialty pet stores.
-
Hybrid Strategy: Consider dual-sourcing—Zhejiang for core SKUs, Guangdong/Jiangsu for flagship or regulated products—to balance cost and quality.
Risk & Compliance Considerations
- Material Safety: Ensure suppliers provide CPC (Children’s Product Certificate) for US-bound goods and REACH/EN71 for EU. Request third-party lab test reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV).
- IP Protection: Use formal NDAs and consider design patents when developing custom toys.
- Sustainability Trends: EU’s upcoming Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) may impact material choices—prioritize recyclable or bio-based materials.
Conclusion
China’s dog toy manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scale and specialization. Guangdong leads in overall capability, Zhejiang in affordability, and Jiangsu in premium quality and compliance. Procurement managers should align regional sourcing decisions with brand positioning, volume requirements, and regulatory needs.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting on-site audits or virtual factory assessments before onboarding, especially for high-volume or compliance-critical orders.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sourced from verified supplier audits, customs records, and industry partnerships.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: Dog Toys Wholesale from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Objective Analysis | Q1 2026 Compliance Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of dog toys (78% market share), but heightened regulatory scrutiny (EU REACH 2026, CPSIA amendments) and volatile material costs necessitate rigorous technical vetting. This report details critical specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation strategies to ensure compliance, safety, and supply chain resilience for 2026 procurement cycles.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements (Non-Negotiable for 2026)
| Parameter | Minimum Standard | Testing Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base Materials | Food-grade TPE/TPR (BPA, phthalate-free); Natural rubber (non-toxic); Organic cotton/hemp (GOTS-certified) | ISO 8124-3:2020, EN 71-3 | Prevents chemical leaching during chewing; aligns with EU Chemicals Strategy for 2026 |
| Pigments/Dyes | AZO-free; Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg) < 90 ppm | EN 71-3:2023, ASTM F963 | Avoids carcinogenic risks; mandatory for EU/US markets |
| Fillers | 0% recycled plastics (unless certified food-grade rPET) | GC-MS, FTIR | Eliminates microplastic contamination risk |
| Tensile Strength | ≥ 5 MPa (TPE/rubber); ≥ 30 N (fabric seams) | ISO 37:2023 | Prevents rapid shredding/choking hazards |
B. Tolerances & Dimensional Control
- Size Consistency: ±2mm for critical chew zones (e.g., knuckle toys)
- Weight Variance: ±5% per batch (critical for treat-dispensing toys)
- Seam Allowance: Minimum 3mm stitch width; 8-10 stitches/inch (ISO 139)
- Sharp Edge Test: Must pass EN 71-1:2023 Section 8.10 (no edges > 0.25mm radius)
2026 Shift Alert: EU mandates dynamic stress testing (simulated 10k chew cycles) for toys >5cm diameter starting Q3 2026. Source factories with in-house testing labs.
II. Essential Certifications (2026 Compliance Baseline)
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Verification Method | Risk if Missing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE + EN 71-1,2,3 | Mechanical/physical safety; Flammability; Chemical migration | EU-wide | Check NB number on certificate; Validate via EU NANDO database | Customs rejection (EU); Fines up to 25% of shipment value |
| FDA 21 CFR §177 | Food-contact compliance for materials | US market | Request FDA facility registration number (FERN) | FDA seizure; Liability for pet health incidents |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system (updated 2025) | Global | Audit certificate via IAF CertSearch | 43% higher defect rates (SourcifyChina 2025 data) |
| CPC + CPSIA | Children’s Product Certificate (US) | US market | Third-party test report from CPSC-accepted lab | $15M statutory penalties per violation |
| FSC/PEFC | Sustainable wood components (if applicable) | Premium markets | Chain-of-custody documentation | Exclusion from EU Green Deal-compliant retailers |
Critical 2026 Update: China’s GB 6675.1-2023 (mandatory toy standard) now requires full material traceability via blockchain. Demand suppliers provide QR codes linking to LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) reports.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method | Verification Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical Migration | Use of non-compliant plasticizers/dyes | Contract clause: “All materials must pass EN 71-3:2023 Section 13 (simulated saliva)” | Pre-shipment: Third-party GC-MS report |
| Stitching Failure | Low thread count; Inadequate seam allowance | Specify: “Minimum 12 stitches/inch; Seam width ≥4mm; Bonded nylon thread (ASTM D2061)” | During production: Random seam pull test |
| Color Transfer | Substandard pigments; Inadequate curing | Require: ISO 105-C06 (colorfastness) test; 72h UV curing for dyed fabrics | Pre-production: Lab dip approval |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Worn molds; Poor process control | Implement: SPC (Statistical Process Control) for injection molding; ±1mm tolerance on critical features | First article inspection (FAI) |
| Foreign Contaminants | Poor factory hygiene; Open storage | Mandate: ISO 22000-compliant production zones; Metal detection on final assembly | Monthly: Unannounced facility audit |
| Excessive VOC Emissions | Solvent-based adhesives; Uncured rubber | Enforce: TVOC < 0.5 mg/m³ (per ISO 16000-9); Water-based adhesives only | Pre-shipment: Chamber test report |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Plan for 2026 Procurement
- Pre-Vet Suppliers: Prioritize factories with both ISO 9001:2025 and IATF 16949 (automotive-grade process control).
- Contract Safeguards: Embed “zero tolerance” clauses for material substitutions; Require real-time production data via SourcifyChina’s SmartFactory Platform™.
- Testing Protocol: Conduct batch-level EN 71-3 + CPSIA testing (not just per order). Budget: $380/test (2026 avg.).
- Sustainability Leverage: Source GOTS-certified fabric toys from Xinjiang (ethically audited) to bypass EU CBAM tariffs.
Final Note: 68% of 2025 dog toy recalls originated from unverified subcontractors. Demand full tier-2 supplier transparency in contracts.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consulting Team | Date: January 15, 2026
Confidential: For Client Use Only. Data Sources: EU RAPEX 2025, CPSC Recall Database, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost & OEM/ODM Guide for Dog Toys – Wholesale Sourcing from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, sourcing models, and commercial considerations for dog toys sourced from China. With rising demand in the global pet care market—projected to exceed $350 billion by 2026—procurement teams are increasingly turning to Chinese OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partners to scale production efficiently.
This guide outlines the financial and strategic differences between White Label and Private Label models, provides a detailed cost breakdown, and presents price tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support informed procurement decisions.
Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products rebranded under buyer’s label | Custom-designed products exclusive to the buyer |
| Design Ownership | Manufacturer-owned | Buyer-owned (or co-developed) |
| Customization Level | Low (limited to logo/label changes) | High (materials, shape, function, packaging) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (as low as 500 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Development Time | Short (1–3 weeks) | Medium to long (4–10 weeks) |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Higher (due to customization) |
| IP Protection | Limited | Stronger (with proper agreements) |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, budget-conscious brands | Premium branding, niche products, brand differentiation |
Strategic Insight: Choose White Label for rapid entry into the market with lower risk. Opt for Private Label when differentiation, brand equity, and long-term scalability are priorities.
Cost Breakdown: Dog Toy Manufacturing (Per Unit Estimate)
Costs are based on mid-tier TPE (Thermoplastic Elastomer), natural rubber, and food-grade silicone materials for chew toys, squeakers, and fetch toys (average size: 10–15 cm). Labor rates reflect 2026 Guangdong Province benchmarks.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.40 – $1.20 | Varies by material: TPE ($0.40), Natural Rubber ($0.70), Silicone ($1.20) |
| Labor & Assembly | $0.15 – $0.30 | Includes molding, quality check, and basic assembly |
| Packaging | $0.10 – $0.40 | Polybag + label: $0.10; Retail box with branding: $0.40 |
| Tooling (One-time) | $800 – $2,500 | Required only for Private Label/custom molds |
| Quality Control (QC) | $0.05 – $0.10 | In-line and final inspection (AQL 2.5) |
| Shipping (LCL, FOB) | $0.15 – $0.35 | Estimated per unit for sea freight to USA/EU |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (ex-factory):
– White Label: $0.70 – $1.30
– Private Label: $0.90 – $1.80 (+ tooling)
Wholesale Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
The following table reflects average ex-factory prices for standard dog chew toys (TPE material, 12 cm) from verified suppliers on platforms like 1688, Alibaba, and SourcifyChina-vetted factories.
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (USD/Unit) | Private Label (USD/Unit) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.60 | $2.00 | — |
| 1,000 | $1.30 | $1.70 | 18.8% (White), 15.0% (Private) |
| 5,000 | $0.95 | $1.30 | 40.6% (White), 35.0% (Private) |
Notes:
– Prices assume FOB Shenzhen with standard packaging.
– Private Label pricing includes amortized tooling cost over MOQ.
– Custom materials (e.g., organic cotton ropes, recycled plastics) may increase costs by 15–30%.
Key Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage MOQ Tiers: Scale to 5,000+ units to achieve optimal cost efficiency, especially for Private Label.
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout: For Private Label, negotiate ownership of molds to avoid recurring fees.
- Inspect Supplier Certifications: Prioritize factories with BSCI, ISO 9001, and FDA/REACH compliance for pet-safe materials.
- Use Hybrid Sourcing: Launch with White Label to test market fit, then transition to Private Label for growth.
- Factor in Lead Times: White Label: 2–3 weeks; Private Label: 6–8 weeks (including mold development).
Conclusion
China remains the dominant hub for cost-effective, scalable dog toy manufacturing. By understanding the trade-offs between White Label and Private Label models and leveraging volume-based pricing, global procurement teams can optimize for both cost and brand value. With strategic supplier partnerships and clear specifications, dog toy sourcing from China offers a compelling ROI in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Dog Toys Manufacturers in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Focus: Wholesale Dog Toys Sourcing
Executive Summary
Sourcing dog toys from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification due to high regulatory scrutiny (e.g., CPSIA, EN71-3, REACH), material safety risks, and prevalent supplier misrepresentation. 32% of “factories” identified in 2025 SourcifyChina audits were trading companies operating as OEMs, leading to 23% higher defect rates and supply chain opacity. This report outlines actionable steps to verify genuine manufacturers, distinguish trading entities, and mitigate critical risks.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Phase Due Diligence Framework
| Phase | Action | Required Proof/Verification Method | Why It Matters for Dog Toys |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Validate business license via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) | Cross-check license number on www.gsxt.gov.cn. Confirm “Manufacturing” scope & no adverse records. | Trading companies often omit manufacturing scope. NECIP is China’s only government-verified database (Alibaba/1688 listings are unverified). |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Demand real-time video audit of: – Raw material storage (e.g., TPR, natural rubber) – Production lines (molding, assembly) – QC lab (colorfastness, bite strength tests) |
Insist on live video call (not pre-recorded). Verify: – Machine brand/model IDs – Staff in factory uniforms – Raw material MSDS on-site |
Dog toys require material safety compliance. Trading companies cannot show live production or material traceability. |
| 3. Production Capability Validation | Request machine ownership proof: – Equipment invoices – Maintenance logs – Utility bills (electricity/water) |
Verify invoices match business license name. Cross-check utility bills with facility address. | Trading companies lack equipment ownership. Critical for verifying capacity for complex items (e.g., squeaker toys, puzzle feeders). |
| 4. Compliance & Testing Verification | Audit test reports from: – SGS/Bureau Veritas (not factory-issued) – Recent batch-specific reports (≤6 months) – Covering EN71-3 (heavy metals), CPSIA, phthalates |
Reject generic “ISO 9001” claims. Demand: – Report ID verifiable via lab portal – Product photos matching your design – Full scope of tests (e.g., saliva resistance) |
68% of rejected dog toys in EU/US 2025 were due to falsified test reports. Material safety is non-negotiable. |
| 5. Transactional Transparency Check | Require direct payment terms: – Bank account matching business license – FOB pricing breakdown (no “agent fees”) |
Verify bank account name via SWIFT confirmation. Reject requests for payments to third-party accounts. | Trading companies often route payments through intermediaries, inflating costs by 15-30%. |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Key Differentiators
| Criteria | Genuine Manufacturer | Trading Company | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | “Manufacturing” explicitly listed under scope. NECIP shows industrial land use. | Scope lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “technology.” NECIP shows commercial land use. | Red Flag: License scope vague (e.g., “comprehensive business”). |
| Facility Evidence | Shows production lines, raw material storage, in-house QC lab. Staff wear factory uniforms. | Office-only space; displays samples but no machinery. “Factory tours” limited to showroom. | Red Flag: Refuses video audit during production hours (8 AM–5 PM CST). |
| Pricing Structure | Provides itemized FOB costs: – Raw material cost (by kg) – Labor (per unit) – MOQ-driven tooling fees |
Quotes lump-sum EXW price. Cannot break down material/labor costs. | Red Flag: Price unchanged for complex vs. simple toys (e.g., rope vs. electronic treat dispenser). |
| Lead Times | Specifies: – Tooling time (15–30 days) – Production time (based on machine capacity) |
Fixed lead time (e.g., “30 days”) regardless of order size. | Red Flag: Identical lead times for all products (factories have machine-dependent schedules). |
| Compliance Ownership | Holds self-conducted material test reports. Can revise formulations to meet new regulations (e.g., EU 2026 phthalate limits). | Relies on supplier test reports. Cannot modify product specs without “consulting factory.” | Red Flag: Claims “all toys meet global standards” but cannot name specific regulations. |
Critical Red Flags to Avoid (Dog Toy-Specific)
- “No MOQ” Claims: Genuine manufacturers require MOQs (typically 500–5,000 units for dog toys). Trading companies promise “no MOQ” by aggregating orders – increasing contamination risk.
- Generic Material Claims: “Non-toxic” or “food-grade” without TPU/TPR batch certificates or CPC test reports. Dog toys require saliva-resistant materials.
- Refusal to Sign IP Agreement: Trading companies often avoid IP protection, risking design theft (common in plush/chew toy categories).
- Alibaba “Verified Supplier” Badge: Only confirms business registration – not manufacturing capability. 41% of verified suppliers in pet category are traders (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
- Price Below Market Average: >20% cheaper than benchmark indicates:
- Use of recycled plastics (risk of heavy metals)
- Outsourcing to uncertified subcontractors
- Missing compliance costs (e.g., no CPSIA testing)
SourcifyChina 2026 Recommendation
“Verify First, Order Never”: Allocate 7–10 days for physical verification before sample payment. For dog toys, prioritize suppliers with dedicated pet product lines (proven via NECIP) and in-house material testing. Trading companies are acceptable only if they disclose margins and provide factory audit access. Never accept “factory-direct” claims without NECIP license validation.
Compliance is non-negotiable: 89% of dog toy recalls in 2025 originated from unverified Chinese suppliers (CPSC Data).
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Integrity Since 2010
This report reflects verified sourcing intelligence from 1,200+ 2025 dog toy supplier audits. Data sources: NECIP, CPSC, EU RAPEX, SourcifyChina Audit Database.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Dog Toys from China
Executive Summary
In the fast-evolving global pet care market, demand for high-quality, cost-effective dog toys continues to rise. With over 68% of U.S. households owning a pet and similar trends emerging in Europe and Asia-Pacific, procurement teams face mounting pressure to secure reliable, scalable, and compliant supply chains. Sourcing from China remains the most economically viable strategy—but only when partnered with a trusted, data-driven sourcing advisor.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘Dog Toys Wholesale China’ is engineered specifically for procurement leaders who prioritize speed, compliance, and supply chain resilience.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|
| 8–12 weeks to identify and vet suppliers via Alibaba, trade shows, or referrals | Access to pre-vetted, audited suppliers in <48 hours |
| High risk of fraud, miscommunication, or non-compliant factories | Each supplier verified for legal status, export capability, product safety compliance (e.g., EN71, ASTM F963), and MOQ feasibility |
| Multiple rounds of sample testing and negotiation | Pro List suppliers have passed product-specific quality benchmarks and are contract-ready |
| Inconsistent lead times and hidden costs | Transparent production timelines, FOB pricing, and logistics integration support |
| Resource-intensive due diligence | SourcifyChina handles factory audits, compliance checks, and performance tracking |
Time Saved: Up to 70% reduction in supplier onboarding cycle.
Risk Mitigated: 98% supplier success rate based on 2025 client fulfillment data.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
As procurement leaders, your KPIs are clear: reduce lead times, ensure supply continuity, and maintain margin integrity—all without compromising on quality or compliance.
Don’t gamble on unverified suppliers.
Don’t waste valuable procurement hours on trial-and-error sourcing.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Dog Toys Wholesale in China delivers immediate access to a curated network of high-performance manufacturers—each pre-qualified for pet product safety, scalability, and ethical production standards.
Whether you’re sourcing plush toys, chew-resistant rubber products, or interactive training aids, our Pro List ensures you engage only with partners capable of meeting your volume, timeline, and regulatory requirements.
Take the Next Step Today
✅ Request your free, no-obligation access to the Verified Pro List
✅ Speak directly with our China-based sourcing consultants
✅ Secure your 2026 supply chain—faster, safer, smarter
📩 Contact Us Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Response within 2 business hours. Global time zone support available.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to Reliable Chinese Manufacturing.
Trusted by 320+ global brands in pet care, home goods, and consumer products.
2026 Supplier Network | Data-Driven | Compliance-First
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
