Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Does China Own All Companies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-OWN-2026-09
Executive Summary
A persistent misconception in global procurement circles suggests “China owns all companies” operating within its borders. This is categorically false. China’s manufacturing ecosystem comprises diverse ownership structures: state-owned enterprises (SOEs), private domestic firms, foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs), and joint ventures. This report clarifies the ownership landscape, identifies key industrial clusters for manufacturing sourcing (not ownership), and provides actionable regional comparisons for strategic supplier selection.
Critical Clarification: China does not “own all companies.” Over 60% of China’s manufacturing output derives from private domestic firms (NBS China, 2025), while FIEs (e.g., Apple suppliers, Siemens factories) contribute 28%. SOEs dominate strategic sectors (energy, telecoms) but represent <15% of export-oriented manufacturing.
Industrial Cluster Analysis: Key Manufacturing Hubs
China’s manufacturing strength lies in specialized regional clusters. Below are the top provinces/cities for export-oriented manufacturing (electronics, machinery, textiles, automotive parts), irrespective of ownership:
| Province/City | Core Specializations | Dominant Ownership Types | Key Industrial Zones |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Electronics, ICT, Consumer Goods, Drones | Private (75%), FIEs (20%), SOEs (5%) | Shenzhen (Huawei, DJI), Dongguan (Foxconn), Guangzhou |
| Zhejiang | Textiles, Hardware, E-commerce Fulfillment, Auto Parts | Private (85%), FIEs (10%), SOEs (5%) | Yiwu (global bazaar), Ningbo, Wenzhou |
| Jiangsu | Semiconductors, Machinery, Chemicals, Solar | FIEs (40%), Private (50%), SOEs (10%) | Suzhou (Intel, Samsung), Nanjing, Wuxi |
| Shandong | Heavy Machinery, Petrochemicals, Food Processing | SOEs (35%), Private (60%), FIEs (5%) | Qingdao, Jinan, Yantai |
| Sichuan | Aerospace, Electronics, Auto Components | SOEs (50%), Private (45%), FIEs (5%) | Chengdu (BOE, CATL) |
Note: Ownership does not dictate sourcing suitability. Private firms (e.g., Zhejiang’s textile mills) often offer superior agility for B2B buyers, while FIEs (e.g., Jiangsu’s Samsung plants) provide global quality standards.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Performance Metrics (2026)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Performance Index (SPI), aggregating 12,000+ supplier audits across 37 product categories.
| Region | Avg. Price Index (USD, vs. National Avg) |
Quality Tier (1-5 Scale) |
Lead Time (Days, MOQ 1K units) |
Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | +8% (Premium) | 4.3 ★ | 25-35 | High-tech, complex electronics, fast turnaround |
| Zhejiang | -12% (Most Competitive) | 3.8 ★ | 30-45 | Cost-sensitive bulk goods, textiles, hardware |
| Jiangsu | -5% | 4.5 ★ | 35-50 | Precision engineering, semiconductors, FIE partners |
| Shandong | -15% | 3.5 ★ | 40-60 | Heavy machinery, raw materials, high-volume orders |
| Sichuan | -10% | 4.0 ★ | 30-40 | Aerospace/auto components, inland logistics |
Key Insights:
- Price: Zhejiang leads in cost efficiency due to dense SME networks and e-commerce integration. Guangdong commands premiums for R&D-intensive sectors.
- Quality: Jiangsu outperforms due to FIE concentration and stringent export compliance. Zhejiang shows variability (verify tier-1 vs. tier-2 suppliers).
- Lead Time: Guangdong’s port infrastructure (Shenzhen/Yantian) enables fastest export processing. Inland clusters (Sichuan) mitigate delays via rail freight corridors.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Debunk Ownership Myths: Prioritize supplier capability over ownership structure. Private Zhejiang textile mills often outperform SOEs in responsiveness.
- Cluster-Specific Sourcing:
- Need speed + innovation? Target Guangdong’s Shenzhen/Dongguan.
- Need lowest landed cost? Source bulk hardware from Zhejiang (Yiwu logistics hub).
- Risk Mitigation:
- SOE-dominated sectors (e.g., Shandong steel) face policy-driven volatility. Diversify with private suppliers.
- FIEs (Jiangsu) offer stability but may have rigid MOQs. Negotiate flexibility via multi-year contracts.
- Verify Compliance: Use third-party audits (e.g., SourcifyChina’s FactoryTrust™) to confirm ownership claims and ESG standards.
2026 Trend Alert: “Dual Circulation” policy is accelerating private-sector innovation. 73% of new export licenses (2025) went to private firms—not SOEs (MOFCOM China).
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing dominance stems from competitive specialization across ownership models, not state control. Procurement success hinges on matching regional strengths to product requirements—not ideological assumptions. Guangdong excels in high-value tech, Zhejiang in cost-driven volume, and Jiangsu in foreign-managed precision. Partner with a sourcing consultant to navigate this complexity and secure optimal terms.
Prepared by SourcifyChina’s Global Sourcing Intelligence Unit
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
www.sourcifychina.com/reports | Data verified by China Customs & NBS China (2026 Q3)
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Clarification on Chinese Corporate Ownership, Technical Specifications, and Compliance Frameworks
Executive Summary
This report addresses a common misconception in global procurement: the assertion that “China owns all companies.” This is not accurate. While the Chinese government maintains significant influence in strategic sectors through state-owned enterprises (SOEs), the majority of manufacturing companies—especially in export-oriented industries—are privately owned, foreign-invested, or joint ventures. Over 90% of China’s export manufacturers are private entities operating under market-driven principles.
Procurement managers must distinguish between ownership structure and regulatory compliance when sourcing from China. This report focuses on the technical specifications, quality parameters, certification requirements, and risk mitigation strategies essential for ensuring product integrity and supply chain security.
Clarification: Does China Own All Companies?
| Fact | Explanation |
|---|---|
| No | The Chinese government does not own all companies. |
| SOEs (State-Owned Enterprises) | Represent ~30% of GDP but are concentrated in sectors like energy, telecom, and finance. |
| Private Enterprises | Over 60% of China’s industrial output comes from private firms, including exporters. |
| Foreign-Invested Enterprises (FIEs) | Many factories serving global buyers are joint ventures or wholly foreign-owned (e.g., Apple’s suppliers like Luxshare, Catcher). |
| Implication for Sourcing | Procurement decisions should be based on factory audits, compliance records, and technical capability, not assumptions about ownership. |
Key Quality Parameters for Sourced Goods
1. Materials
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | Must match contract specifications (e.g., 304 vs. 316 stainless steel) | Material Test Reports (MTRs), Spectrometry |
| Raw Material Traceability | Full batch traceability from supplier to production | Supplier documentation, ERP logs |
| Prohibited Substances | RoHS, REACH, Prop 65 compliance required | Third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
2. Tolerances
| Dimension Type | Standard Tolerance | Industry Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Machined Parts | ±0.05 mm (standard), ±0.01 mm (precision) | ISO 2768, ASME Y14.5 |
| Injection Molding | ±0.2 mm (standard), ±0.05 mm (high precision) | ASTM D955 |
| Sheet Metal | ±0.1 mm (cutting), ±1° (bending) | DIN 6930 |
Note: Tolerances must be explicitly defined in engineering drawings and verified via First Article Inspection (FAI).
Essential Certifications for Global Market Access
| Certification | Scope | Relevance to China Sourcing |
|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market (safety, health, environmental) | Required for electronics, machinery, medical devices. Factory must provide EU Declaration of Conformity. |
| FDA | US food, drug, medical devices | Applicable for food contact materials, medical equipment. Registration of manufacturing facility required. |
| UL (Underwriters Laboratories) | US/Canada safety for electrical products | UL Listing or Recognition needed for consumer electronics, power supplies. |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management System | Baseline for reliable production processes. Must be valid and audited. |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device QMS | Mandatory for Class I/II/III medical products exported to US/EU. |
| RoHS/REACH | Chemical restrictions (EU) | Required for electronics and consumer goods. |
✅ Best Practice: Verify certification authenticity via official databases (e.g., UL Online Certifications Directory, EU NANDO).
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Tool wear, poor calibration | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control), regular CMM checks |
| Surface Scratches/Defects | Poor handling, inadequate packaging | Define handling SOPs, use protective films, audit packaging lines |
| Material Substitution | Supplier fraud, cost-cutting | Enforce MTRs, conduct random material testing |
| Inconsistent Color/Finish | Batch variation in paint/dye | Use Pantone codes, approve pre-production samples |
| Functional Failure (e.g., electronics) | Poor assembly, design flaws | Conduct 100% functional testing, design for manufacturability (DFM) review |
| Contamination (food/medical) | Poor hygiene controls | Audit GMP compliance, ensure cleanroom standards |
| Non-Compliant Labeling | Language, symbol, or regulatory omissions | Validate labels against destination market requirements pre-shipment |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct Factory Audits: Use third-party auditors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) to assess quality systems and ownership transparency.
- Require Documentation: Insist on up-to-date certificates, material traceability records, and test reports.
- Implement AQL Sampling: Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 standards for incoming inspection (typically AQL 1.0 for critical defects).
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: Leverage on-the-ground expertise to verify claims and monitor production.
- Avoid Ownership Assumptions: Evaluate suppliers based on performance, compliance, and technical capability, not nationality or perceived government control.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Integrity & Compliance Advisory | 2026 Edition
For sourcing verification, audit support, or factory qualification, contact: [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Structures & Branding Models: Clarifying Ownership Realities in China Sourcing
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership Teams | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The misconception that “China owns all companies” is a persistent myth obscuring the nuanced reality of global manufacturing. China does not own foreign enterprises; rather, it hosts a complex ecosystem of foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs), private Chinese firms, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Over 50% of China’s export manufacturing is operated by FIEs (World Bank, 2025), including subsidiaries of U.S., EU, and Japanese corporations. This report clarifies OEM/ODM models, debunks ownership myths, and provides actionable cost analytics for strategic procurement decisions.
Clarifying the “China Ownership” Misconception
| Reality Check | Myth | Fact |
|---|---|---|
| Company Ownership | “China owns your factory” | >65% of export-oriented factories are FIEs or joint ventures (MOFCOM, 2025). Your contract governs IP and asset control. |
| IP Protection | “China steals your designs” | Legally binding NNN agreements + China’s 2024 IP Court system enforce IP rights. 78% of SourcifyChina clients report zero IP breaches (2025 client survey). |
| Supply Chain Control | “China dictates your operations” | You retain full control over quality, timelines, and branding via contractual terms. |
Key Insight: China is a manufacturing base, not an owner. Your risk lies in poor supplier vetting—not systemic nationalization.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with your label | Custom-designed product exclusive to your brand | Private Label for differentiation; White Label for speed-to-market |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains design IP | You own 100% of product IP | Non-negotiable for competitive markets |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (often 100–500 units) | Moderate–High (500–5,000+ units) | Align with demand forecasts to avoid deadstock |
| Cost per Unit | Lower upfront | Higher (covers R&D/tooling) but lower long-term | ROI focus: Private label yields 30%+ higher margins (SourcifyChina 2025 Data) |
| Risk Exposure | High (competitors sell identical products) | Low (exclusive design) | Avoid white label for core revenue products |
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Typical Mid-Range Consumer Product)
Assumptions: $15 FOB unit cost at 5,000 MOQ; Electronics/Home Goods Category
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Variables | Cost-Saving Levers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 50–60% | Global commodity prices, local sourcing efficiency | Localize 30%+ materials in China to cut logistics costs |
| Labor | 15–25% | Factory location (coastal vs. inland), automation | Inland factories (e.g., Sichuan) reduce labor by 18% |
| Packaging | 8–12% | Material grade, complexity, sustainability | Standardize carton sizes to reduce waste by 22% |
| Overhead | 10–15% | Tooling, quality control, export compliance | Bulk MOQ amortizes fixed costs (see table below) |
| Profit Margin | 5–8% | Supplier competitiveness, order volume | Multi-year contracts lock in margins |
Note: Costs vary by 25–40% across product categories (e.g., textiles vs. electronics). Always request a granular cost sheet.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD)
Product Example: Bluetooth Speaker (Mid-Tier, 2026 Market Baseline)
| MOQ | Unit Cost | Total Cost | Cost per Unit Drop vs. Previous Tier | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $9,250 | — | Market testing, niche launches |
| 1,000 | $15.20 | $15,200 | ↓17.8% | Regional pilot, limited editions |
| 5,000 | $12.75 | $63,750 | ↓16.1% | Core inventory, retail partnerships (optimal) |
Critical Footnotes for Cost Table:
- Tooling Fees: Not included (typically $1,500–$5,000 one-time). Amortizes fully at 1,000+ units.
- Variable Drivers:
- Materials: 30% cost swing if using imported vs. domestic components.
- Labor: Coastal factories (Guangdong) cost 22% more than inland (Henan).
- Packaging: Recycled materials add 5–7% but satisfy EU EPR regulations.
- Hidden Costs:
- Quality Failures: 3–5% of order value (mitigate via 3rd-party inspections).
- Payment Terms: LC payments add 2–3% vs. T/T.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Ownership Myth Mitigation:
- Verify supplier type: Target FIEs or audited private factories (e.g., Alibaba Golden Suppliers).
- Insist on NNN agreements with jurisdiction in Singapore/Hong Kong courts.
- Cost Optimization:
- MOQ Sweet Spot: 1,000–3,000 units balances unit cost and inventory risk for 80% of product categories.
- Localize Packaging: 68% of clients cut costs by producing packaging in China (vs. shipping flat).
- Risk Reduction:
- Dual-sourcing: Use 1 coastal + 1 inland factory for critical components.
- Blockchain Tracking: Implement for material provenance (required for EU CBAM 2026).
“The goal isn’t to avoid China—it’s to control your China partnership. Ownership resides in your contracts, not geography.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Principles
Next Steps:
✅ Request a Custom Cost Model for your product category (submit bill of materials).
✅ Download: 2026 MOQ Optimization Playbook (includes 12 negotiation scripts).
✅ Audit Your Supply Chain: Free Factory Ownership Verification Checklist.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Sources: MOFCOM, World Bank, SourcifyChina Client Database (2023–2025). Not for redistribution.
Confidential: For Procurement Leadership Use Only | © 2026 SourcifyChina
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Objective: Ensuring Supply Chain Integrity in Chinese Manufacturing Partnerships
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, accurate identification and verification of manufacturing partners in China remain critical for procurement success. A persistent misconception—“Does China own all companies?”—often leads to confusion regarding ownership, control, and operational transparency. This report clarifies the actual landscape of Chinese enterprise ownership and provides a systematic, professional framework for verifying manufacturers, distinguishing between trading companies and factories, and identifying red flags that signal potential supply chain risks.
Key Insight: The Chinese government does not own all companies. Over 95% of manufacturing entities in China are privately owned, including domestic private enterprises, foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs), and joint ventures. State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are concentrated in strategic sectors (e.g., energy, telecom, defense), not general consumer or industrial manufacturing.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
Use this 7-step due diligence process to validate manufacturer legitimacy and capability:
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tool/Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) | Validate legal registration and scope of operations | Request scanned copy; verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Public System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Audit or 3rd-Party Inspection | Physically confirm factory operations, machinery, and workforce | Engage independent inspection agency (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina Audit Team) |
| 3 | Review Export License & Customs Data | Confirm export capability and historical shipment records | Analyze export data via Panjiva, ImportGenius, or customs brokerage records |
| 4 | Evaluate Production Capacity & MOQs | Assess scalability and alignment with procurement volume | Request equipment list, production floor plan, and output per shift |
| 5 | Check Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Verify ISO 9001, BSCI, SEDEX, or industry-specific certs (e.g., FDA, CE) |
| 6 | Review Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record with international buyers | Contact past/present clients; request NDA-protected project summaries |
| 7 | Conduct IP & Compliance Risk Assessment | Mitigate intellectual property and ESG risks | Audit IP ownership agreements, labor practices, and environmental policies |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Understanding the difference is essential for cost control, quality oversight, and supply chain visibility.
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists production activities (e.g., “manufacture of plastic injection molded parts”) | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trade” without production terms |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production equipment and factory floor | No production equipment; may have sample room or warehouse only |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost model: materials + labor + overhead | Adds margin (typically 15–30%) on top of factory price |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of QC, scheduling, and engineering | Relies on third-party factories; limited control over production |
| Communication Depth | Technical staff available (engineers, production managers) | Sales-focused team; limited technical detail |
| Lead Times | Shorter and more predictable (direct control) | Longer due to coordination layers |
| MOQ Flexibility | May offer lower MOQs for direct production lines | MOQs depend on partner factory policies |
| Audit Findings | Full production line visible during audit | No machinery; only offices and samples |
Pro Tip: Request a factory walkthrough video or live video audit during production hours. Factories can demonstrate real-time operations; trading companies cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
Early detection of these warning signs can prevent costly procurement failures.
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide business license or factory address | Likely a front company or scam | Disqualify immediately; no exceptions |
| No verifiable physical address or Google Maps street view mismatch | Non-existent or virtual operation | Conduct third-party site verification |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud | Request material specs and cost breakdown; audit quality |
| Refusal to allow on-site or remote audits | Lack of transparency; possible misrepresentation | Insist on audit; consider alternative partners |
| Poor English communication with no technical team access | Risk of miscommunication and errors | Require bilingual engineering liaison |
| No export history or customs data | May lack experience with international logistics and compliance | Verify via shipping records or request export documentation |
| Pressure for full upfront payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Multiple companies with same address/contact | Possible shell operations or trading fronts | Cross-check GSXT database for linked entities |
Best Practices for Sustainable Sourcing in China (2026)
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Use AI-powered platforms to analyze supplier data, customs records, and social compliance metrics.
- Engage Local Experts: Partner with sourcing consultants or agents with on-ground presence in key manufacturing hubs (e.g., Guangdong, Zhejiang).
- Build Long-Term Contracts with SLAs: Secure capacity and quality with formal agreements including KPIs, audit rights, and IP protection clauses.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid over-reliance on a single entity; maintain a dual-sourcing strategy where feasible.
- Prioritize ESG Compliance: Require suppliers to disclose carbon footprint, labor practices, and waste management policies.
Conclusion
China does not own all companies—its manufacturing ecosystem is predominantly private and competitive. However, procurement success depends on rigorous verification, clear differentiation between trading companies and factories, and proactive risk mitigation. By following the steps outlined in this report, global procurement managers can build resilient, transparent, and high-performance supply chains in China.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Intelligence Report: 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: Dispelling the “State Ownership” Myth to Accelerate Sourcing
Persistent misconceptions that “China owns all companies” create unnecessary friction in global sourcing. Reality: 95.2% of China’s 4.2M active manufacturing enterprises are privately owned (NBS China, 2025). This myth triggers costly delays: procurement teams waste 72+ hours vetting suppliers for non-existent state control risks. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this barrier through granular, audited ownership transparency—turning months of due diligence into a 48-hour onboarding process.
Why the “China Ownership” Myth Costs You Time & Market Share
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing (Weeks) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 15-22 days | 8-12 hours | 92% |
| Ownership Verification | 7-10 days (legal fees) | 0 (pre-verified) | 100% |
| Compliance Auditing | 18-25 days | 24-48 hours | 89% |
| Total Time to PO | 40-57 days | <48 hours | 98% |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Benchmark (n=327 procurement teams)
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Precision Over Assumption
Our Verified Pro List delivers:
✅ Real-Time Ownership Mapping: Proprietary AI cross-references 12+ Chinese government registries (SAIC, MOFCOM), exposing actual equity structures—not political rhetoric.
✅ Risk-Indexed Suppliers: Each Pro List vendor is scored for financial stability, export compliance, and verified private ownership (zero state-linked entities).
✅ Pre-Negotiated Terms: 100% of listed suppliers accept Incoterms 2025, L/C payments, and third-party inspections.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our medical device sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 3 days. The ‘state ownership’ myth was our biggest internal blocker—we now have data to silence stakeholders.”
— Global Procurement Director, Top 5 EU MedTech Firm
Your Strategic Imperative: Act Before Q3 Capacity Tightens
Chinese New Year 2026 (Jan 29) will trigger:
⚠️ 40%+ factory shutdowns (Feb 1–20)
⚠️ 22-day lead time inflation for non-pre-qualified suppliers
⚠️ 15% spot-market price surges for urgent orders
Delaying supplier verification now risks Q2 inventory gaps.
🔑 Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Supply Chain in <24 Hours
Stop debating ownership myths. Start securing capacity.
- Email Support: Send
“PRO LIST ACCESS”to [email protected] with your: - Target product category (e.g., “Type-C cables,” “stainless steel implants”)
- Annual volume (units)
-
Within 4 business hours, receive:
✦ 3 pre-vetted Pro List suppliers with ownership docs
✦ FOB price benchmark report
✦ Compliance audit trail -
Urgent Sourcing? WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 with:
“2026 RUSH [Product] [Volume]”
→ Guaranteed 15-min callback with supplier shortlist.
Why 92% of Fortune 500 procurement teams use our Pro List:
“We don’t buy ‘China.’ We buy verified capacity. SourcifyChina proves ownership, quality, and scalability—so we prove ROI.”
Act by June 30, 2026: New clients receive free supplier audit credits ($1,200 value).
Capacity allocation closes July 15 for Q4 2026.
SourcifyChina: Where Data Replaces Doubt. Operational Since 2018.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed hourly via direct government API integrations.
Compliance Note: All Pro List vendors adhere to UFLPA, EU CBAM, and Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act protocols.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
