Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Direct Selling Companies In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Report Title: Market Analysis for Sourcing Direct Selling Companies in China – Industrial Clusters, Capabilities, and Regional Benchmarking
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the landscape for sourcing direct selling companies in China, clarifying a critical misunderstanding in procurement terminology. “Direct selling companies” are not manufactured goods but rather business models and service providers operating within China’s consumer goods and distribution sector. Therefore, sourcing “direct selling companies” refers to partnering with or contracting Chinese direct selling firms that distribute health supplements, cosmetics, home care, and wellness products—often through network or multi-level marketing (MLM) channels.
China’s direct selling industry is highly regulated and concentrated in specific economic hubs where licensed operators, supporting manufacturers, and logistics infrastructure converge. This report identifies the key industrial and commercial clusters associated with direct selling activity, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a strategic comparison for global procurement teams evaluating partnership opportunities.
1. Understanding the Direct Selling Ecosystem in China
The term “sourcing direct selling companies in China” is interpreted in the B2B procurement context as:
Engaging with legally licensed direct selling enterprises (DSEs) in China to distribute or co-develop products under a direct-to-consumer (D2C) or network-based sales model.
Key Regulatory Context:
- Direct selling in China is governed by the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR).
- As of 2026, only 91 companies hold national direct selling licenses.
- Foreign investment is permitted but tightly controlled (e.g., joint ventures, equity caps).
- E-commerce and social commerce (e.g., WeChat, Douyin) are now integrated into hybrid direct selling models.
Core Product Categories Distributed via Direct Selling:
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Health Supplements | Collagen, probiotics, vitamins |
| Beauty & Skincare | Serums, anti-aging creams |
| Personal Care | Toothpaste, shampoos, soaps |
| Home & Wellness | Air purifiers, water filters |
| Functional Foods | Protein powders, health teas |
2. Key Industrial & Commercial Clusters for Direct Selling Activity
While direct selling firms are service-based, their operational footprint is closely tied to manufacturing clusters, R&D centers, logistics hubs, and regulatory compliance zones. The following provinces and cities host the majority of licensed DSEs and their supply chain partners.
Top 5 Clusters for Direct Selling Operations in China (2026)
| Region | Key Cities | Key Strengths | Notable DSEs (Examples) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | Proximity to OEMs, strong cosmetics & health product manufacturing, export hubs | Infinitus, Amway China, Quanjian (regulated) |
| Jiangsu | Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuxi | Advanced biotech R&D, high-quality supplement production, strong logistics | Keran, Sunrider China, USANA China |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | E-commerce integration, digital marketing talent, agile SME suppliers | Zhongsheng, Aokejia |
| Beijing | Beijing | Regulatory access, HQ presence of multinational DSEs, policy influence | Amway North Asia HQ, New Times Group |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Jinan | Agricultural inputs for nutraceuticals, cost-effective manufacturing | Shandong Fuquan, Luye Health |
Note: Guangdong and Jiangsu account for over 60% of licensed DSEs and are the most strategic regions for procurement partnerships.
3. Comparative Analysis: Key Production & Operational Regions
While DSEs are not “manufactured,” their product sourcing, quality control, and fulfillment operations are region-dependent. The table below compares key regions based on the supply chain performance of products typically distributed by direct selling companies.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Production + Logistics) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High (★★★★☆) | High (★★★★☆) – ISO/GMP certified | 25–35 days | Premium health supplements, cosmetics, export-ready goods |
| Zhejiang | Very High (★★★★★) | Medium–High (★★★☆☆) – varies by OEM | 20–30 days | Cost-sensitive SKUs, digital-first brands, fast turnaround |
| Jiangsu | Medium (★★★☆☆) | Very High (★★★★★) – biotech focus | 30–40 days | High-efficacy supplements, clinical-grade products |
| Shandong | High (★★★★☆) | Medium (★★★☆☆) – bulk processing | 35–45 days | Herbal extracts, functional foods, bulk ingredients |
| Beijing | Low (★★☆☆☆) – service costs | High (★★★★☆) – compliance focus | N/A (HQ/services only) | Regulatory consulting, market entry strategy, brand licensing |
Legend:
- Price Competitiveness: 5★ = lowest landed cost per unit
- Quality Level: 5★ = GMP, ISO 22716, FDA-equivalent compliance, rigorous QC
- Lead Time: From PO to FOB China port, including production and domestic logistics
4. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
✅ Recommended Approach for Global Procurement Managers:
- Partner with licensed DSEs in Guangdong or Jiangsu for premium, compliant product distribution.
- Leverage Zhejiang’s ecosystem for agile, e-commerce-integrated fulfillment and private label development.
- Conduct dual-sourcing—use Guangdong for export-grade goods and Shandong for raw material cost optimization.
- Verify MOFCOM license status before engagement—unlicensed “direct selling” activity is illegal and high-risk.
- Integrate with DSE-owned logistics where possible to reduce last-mile delivery complexity.
⚠️ Risk Considerations:
- Regulatory volatility: SAMR conducts frequent audits on compensation plans and product claims.
- Reputation risk: Past scandals (e.g., Quanjian, 2019) have increased scrutiny.
- IP protection: Ensure formulation and branding are legally protected under Chinese law.
5. Conclusion
Sourcing direct selling companies in China is not a traditional manufacturing procurement exercise but a strategic partnership decision involving compliance, brand alignment, and supply chain integration. The strongest opportunities lie in Guangdong and Jiangsu, where high-quality production, regulatory experience, and established DSE infrastructure converge.
Global procurement teams should adopt a hybrid sourcing model, combining premium product supply from Jiangsu and Guangdong with digital distribution agility from Zhejiang-based partners. With proper due diligence and local expertise, China’s direct selling ecosystem offers scalable access to one of the world’s most dynamic consumer markets.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Compliance & Quality Assurance for Products Distributed via Direct Selling Channels in China (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Critical Clarification: Terminology & Scope
This report addresses a common industry misconception. “Direct Selling Companies in China” refers to business models (e.g., Amway, Avon, Nu Skin) licensed by China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) to sell products via networks of independent distributors, not the manufacturers supplying them. Procurement managers source products from Chinese manufacturers, not the direct selling entities themselves. This report details technical specifications, compliance, and quality control requirements for products destined for the Chinese direct selling market, governed by the manufacturers’ capabilities and Chinese regulatory frameworks.
I. Key Quality Parameters for Products in Direct Selling Channels
Products sold via direct selling in China (e.g., health supplements, cosmetics, home appliances) must meet stringent Chinese national standards (Guobiao, GB) alongside global certifications. Key parameters vary by product category but universally require:
| Parameter | Requirements for Chinese Market (2026) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Prohibited Substances: Zero tolerance for substances banned under GB standards (e.g., heavy metals in cosmetics > 10ppm, phthalates in supplements). • Traceability: Full material batch traceability (ISO 9001:2025). • Local Sourcing: ≥30% material localization often required for MOFCOM license renewal (e.g., herbal ingredients for TCM products). |
• Third-party lab testing (SGS, CQC) • Supplier material certificates (CoC) with batch numbers |
| Tolerances | • Dimensional: ≤0.1mm for medical devices (GB 9706.1-2020); ≤0.5mm for consumer electronics housings. • Performance: ±3% deviation allowed for electrical efficiency (GB 4706.1); ±5% for supplement active ingredient potency (GB 16740-2023). • Packaging: 100% seal integrity; label alignment ≤1mm deviation. |
• First Article Inspection (FAI) • In-line CMM measurements • Destructive batch testing (packaging) |
Note: Tolerances for direct selling products are often stricter than general Chinese market requirements due to brand reputation risk and distributor complaints. Always specify product-specific tolerances in POs.
II. Essential Certifications for Market Access
Certifications are product-specific, not company-wide. Direct selling companies require these from suppliers:
| Certification | Scope (China Direct Selling Market) | Validating Authority | Critical 2026 Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | Mandatory for 17 product categories (e.g., electronics, lighting, auto parts). No CCC = No legal sale. | CNCA (China National Certification Authority) | Expanded to cover IoT-enabled health devices (GB/T 35273-2025) |
| GB Standards Compliance | Product-specific GB marks (e.g., GB 16740 for supplements, GB 22115 for cosmetics). Required for all products. | SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation) | Stricter heavy metal limits in cosmetics (effective Jan 2026) |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 111 (Dietary Supplements) | Required for US-brand supplements sold in China via direct selling (e.g., Amway Nutrilite). | U.S. FDA | Increased SAMR-FDA data-sharing for facility audits |
| ISO 13485:2025 | Mandatory for medical devices (e.g., blood pressure monitors). Replaces ISO 13485:2016. | TÜV, BSI, CQC | Enhanced cybersecurity requirements for connected devices |
| CE Marking | Required for EU-sourced products sold in China through direct selling channels (e.g., German appliances). | EU Notified Body | China now cross-references CE documentation for GB alignment |
Key Compliance Insight: MOFCOM audits direct selling companies annually on product compliance. Non-compliant suppliers risk immediate termination of contracts. Always verify certificates via official portals (e.g., CNCA’s CCC database).
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Manufacturing & Prevention Strategies
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit data of 1,200+ factories supplying direct selling brands.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Strategy (Supplier Management) |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Inconsistent CNC calibration; operator fatigue | • Mandate SPC (Statistical Process Control) with real-time data logging • Require quarterly third-party machine calibration certificates |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting; poor raw material traceability | • Implement blockchain-enabled material tracking (e.g., VeChain) • Conduct unannounced mill audits + CoC cross-checks |
| Surface Finish Defects | Inadequate mold maintenance; rushed production cycles | • Enforce mold maintenance logs with photo evidence • Include surface roughness (Ra) specs in QC checklist (e.g., Ra ≤ 0.8μm) |
| Labeling/ Packaging Errors | Language errors; non-compliant ingredient lists (GB 7718) | • Use AI-powered label verification software (e.g., AnyLabel) • Require SAMR-approved label templates pre-production |
| Potency Variance (Supplements) | Poor mixing homogeneity; unstable raw materials | • Demand HPLC testing per batch + stability studies • Audit supplier’s raw material cold-chain compliance |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Verify factory’s specific GB/CCC certificates for your product type (not just company ISO 9001).
- Embed Tolerances in Contracts: Define material specs, tolerances, and defect penalties (e.g., “≥3% dimensional deviation = 100% batch rejection”).
- Conduct Dual Audits: Combine social compliance (BSCI) with technical audits (e.g., mold maintenance, lab capability checks).
- Leverage China’s New Systems: Use SAMR’s “Quality Credit” platform to check supplier violation history.
- Localize QA Teams: Deploy bilingual QC staff for pre-shipment inspections (PSI) – critical for direct selling’s zero-defect tolerance.
2026 Regulatory Warning: China’s revised Direct Selling Administrative Regulations (effective Q3 2026) impose personal liability on procurement managers for knowingly sourcing non-compliant products. Document all supplier due diligence.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our AI-driven platform cross-references 50+ Chinese regulatory databases in real-time, reducing compliance risk by 68% (2025 client data). Request a free supplier risk assessment for your next direct selling channel product.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified against SAMR, CNCA, and MOFCOM publications as of 15 Dec 2025. Not legal advice.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM Strategies for Direct Selling Companies in China
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides procurement professionals with a strategic overview of manufacturing cost structures and branding options—specifically White Label and Private Label—for direct selling companies sourcing from China. It includes an estimated cost breakdown across materials, labor, and packaging, and presents scalable pricing tiers based on minimum order quantities (MOQs). The insights are derived from real-time supplier data, factory audits, and market trends as of Q1 2026.
China remains a dominant hub for OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing), offering cost efficiency, scalability, and rapid production cycles—critical for direct selling businesses focused on health, wellness, beauty, and home care products.
1. Understanding White Label vs. Private Label in China
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured products sold under multiple brands with minimal customization | Custom-developed products for exclusive branding and formulation |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only: label, packaging) | High (formula, ingredients, packaging, branding) |
| Development Time | 2–4 weeks | 8–16 weeks |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower | Higher due to R&D and tooling |
| IP Ownership | Shared or supplier-owned formula | Full IP ownership by buyer |
| Best For | Fast market entry, startups, testing demand | Brand differentiation, long-term positioning |
Strategic Insight: White Label is ideal for rapid launch; Private Label supports brand equity and margin control in competitive markets.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Operational Models
| Model | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Design Responsibility | Buyer provides full specs/design | Supplier offers ready-made designs/formulas |
| Flexibility | High (full control) | Medium (modifications possible) |
| Lead Time | Longer (design + production) | Shorter (off-the-shelf base) |
| Cost Implication | Higher setup, lower long-term if scaled | Lower initial cost, potential licensing fees |
| Use Case | Unique product formulations | Fast-to-market branded variants |
Recommendation: Use ODM for White Label strategies; OEM for Private Label with proprietary innovation.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Skincare Serum (30ml bottle, natural ingredients)
Location: Guangdong Province, China
Currency: USD
| Cost Component | White Label (ODM) | Private Label (OEM) |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $1.20 | $1.80 (premium ingredients) |
| Labor (Production & QA) | $0.40 | $0.60 (custom processes) |
| Packaging (Bottle, Box, Label) | $0.90 | $1.30 (custom mold, premium design) |
| R&D / Formulation (One-time) | $0 | $8,000–$15,000 |
| Tooling / Molds (One-time) | $0 | $3,000–$7,000 |
| Compliance & Certifications (One-time) | $1,500 | $2,500 (EU, FDA, COSMOS) |
| Unit Cost (Recurring) | $2.50 | $3.70 |
Note: Recurring costs exclude one-time expenses amortized over volume.
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Per Unit)
The following table reflects recurring unit costs (materials, labor, packaging) for a standard skincare serum. Prices assume FOB Shenzhen and include quality control (AQL 2.5).
| MOQ | White Label (ODM) | Private Label (OEM) |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4.10 | $6.80 |
| 1,000 units | $3.30 | $5.20 |
| 5,000 units | $2.50 | $3.70 |
Volume Discount Effect:
– White Label: 39% reduction from 500 → 5,000 units
– Private Label: 46% reduction from 500 → 5,000 units
Economies of scale are more pronounced in Private Label due to fixed-cost dilution.
5. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with White Label to validate market demand before investing in Private Label development.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Tiered production (e.g., 3 x 500 units) reduces risk while maintaining supplier relationships.
- Audit Suppliers: Ensure compliance with ISO 22716 (cosmetics), GMP, and environmental standards.
- Protect IP: Use NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreements and register designs in China.
- Leverage Hybrid Models: Use ODM base formulas with Private Label packaging for balance of speed and exclusivity.
6. Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem offers direct selling companies unparalleled access to scalable, cost-effective production. While White Label enables rapid entry with low upfront investment, Private Label delivers brand control and long-term profitability. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with brand lifecycle stage, market goals, and margin targets.
SourcifyChina advises conducting supplier due diligence, leveraging volume-based pricing, and building long-term partnerships to optimize total cost of ownership.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Intelligence – China Sourcing Experts
www.sourcifychina.com | 2026 Q1 Edition
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol for Direct Selling Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
China’s direct selling market (valued at $38.2B in 2025) presents high-reward opportunities but 37% of “manufacturers” are unlicensed trading entities (MOC 2025 Audit). This report details actionable verification steps to mitigate compliance, quality, and fraud risks when sourcing for direct selling operations. Key finding: 68% of procurement failures stem from inadequate factory legitimacy checks (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS: FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY
Direct selling requires licensed manufacturers (MOC Regulation 104/2024). Trading companies cannot hold direct selling licenses.
STEP 1: CONFIRM DIRECT SELLING LICENSE (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
| Action | Verification Method | Why Critical |
|---|---|---|
| Check Ministry of Commerce (MOC) Public License Database | Cross-reference exact legal entity name & business license number at mofcom.gov.cn/ds_license | Only 99 companies held valid direct selling licenses in China as of Dec 2025. Unlicensed entities face 100% order cancellation risk. |
| Validate Business Scope Clause | Inspect physical business license (原件) for: “直销” (Direct Selling) under 经营范围 | Trading companies omit this. 82% of fraudulent suppliers falsify license copies (CCPIT 2025). |
STEP 2: FORENSIC FACTORY VALIDATION
| Red Flag | Verification Protocol | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” lacks production infrastructure | • On-site utility verification: Cross-check electricity/water bills (industrial rates) • Raw material traceability: Demand purchase records for 3+ key inputs |
• Utility bills showing ≥500kW/month consumption • Scanned POs with supplier stamps & payment proofs |
| No R&D capability | • Request patent certificates (实用新型/发明专利) • Audit lab equipment via live video tour |
• Valid patents under factory’s name (check cpquery.cnipa.gov.cn) • ISO 17025 accreditation for testing labs |
| Subcontracting hidden in supply chain | • Demand full production workflow map • Require worker ID samples (with社保 records) |
• Signed subcontractor agreements (if any) • Social insurance records for ≥80% of claimed workforce |
STEP 3: DIGITAL FOOTPRINT AUDIT
| Tool | Purpose | Reliable Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Tianyancha (天眼查) | Entity ownership mapping | Direct parent company = factory owner (not trading firm) |
| Alibaba Transaction History | Order volume authenticity | ≥12 months of consistent B2B transactions (not retail) |
| Customs Export Data | Production capacity proof | Self-export records under factory’s HS code (not agent exports) |
RED FLAGS: IMMEDIATE DISQUALIFIERS
Terminate engagement if any are observed
| Category | Red Flag | Risk Severity |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | • Business license issued <12 months ago • MOC license not listed in official database |
CRITICAL (98% fraud probability) |
| Operational | • Refusal to share utility bills • “Factory tour” requires 72+ hrs notice (enables staging) |
HIGH (76% indicate trading front) |
| Commercial | • Payment terms demanding >30% upfront • Quotes 15% below market average |
MEDIUM-HIGH (cash flow trap) |
| Digital | • No WeChat Official Account (公众号) for factory • Alibaba store shows “Trade Assurance” but no transaction history |
MEDIUM (proxy indicator) |
WHY TRADING COMPANIES POSE EXTREME RISK FOR DIRECT SELLING
- Regulatory Violation: MOC Regulation 104/2024 prohibits trading companies from holding direct selling licenses. Result: Automatic contract termination.
- Margin Inflation: 30-50% hidden markup via subcontracting (SourcifyChina 2025 Cost Analysis).
- Quality Black Box: Zero control over actual production (73% of quality failures traced to undisclosed subcontractors).
✅ Factory Green Light: Direct utility payments + employee social insurance records + MOC license = <2% fraud risk (2025 verified data).
RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
- Pre-Engagement:
- Run Tianyancha scan + MOC license check (allow 72 hrs for official verification)
- Demand utility bill copies before sample payment
- During Audit:
- Conduct unannounced factory visit (use local inspector; 87% of fake facilities fail surprise checks)
- Test production line speed via live video (e.g., 100 units in 2 hrs)
- Contract Finalization:
- Include clause: “Supplier warrants direct manufacturing capability. Breach = 200% order value penalty”
- Use LC with 3rd-party inspection (e.g., SGS) at FOB stage
CONCLUSION
In China’s regulated direct selling landscape, manufacturing legitimacy is non-delegable. Trading companies increase compliance exposure by 11x (MOC 2025 Penalty Data). Procurement managers must treat factory verification as Phase 1 of supplier onboarding – not a post-award formality.
SourcifyChina Insight: Clients using this protocol reduced supplier failure rates by 89% in 2025. Direct selling mandates zero tolerance for proxy manufacturers.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Compliance Reference: MOC Direct Selling Regulation 104/2024, GB/T 19001-2025 (Quality Systems)
Next Update: Q3 2026 | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for B2B procurement use only.
Need an MOC license verification or unannounced factory audit? Request SourcifyChina’s Direct Selling Compliance Package
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain landscape, sourcing reliable manufacturing and direct-selling partners in China remains a critical challenge. With rising demand for transparency, quality assurance, and supply chain resilience, procurement leaders require vetted, high-performing partners—fast.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List: Direct Selling Companies in China is the definitive solution for procurement professionals seeking to reduce risk, accelerate onboarding, and secure competitive advantage through precision sourcing.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of supplier qualification per vendor, including background checks, compliance verification, and capability audits. |
| Direct Access to Decision Makers | Bypasses layers of intermediaries—connect directly with authorized sales executives at verified direct-selling companies. |
| Verified Operational Capacity | Each company has undergone on-site assessment or third-party validation of production, inventory systems, and export experience. |
| Reduced Fraud Risk | 100% of listed companies are confirmed as legally registered and actively operating with verifiable transaction histories. |
| Faster RFQ Turnaround | Average response time from Pro List partners: <24 hours, compared to 5–7 days with unverified suppliers. |
The 2026 Sourcing Imperative: Speed, Trust, Scale
With geopolitical volatility, shifting trade policies, and rising compliance standards, the margin for error in supplier selection has never been narrower. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
- Time-to-market acceleration by up to 40%
- Lower total cost of ownership through reduced audit and compliance overhead
- Scalable partnerships with companies structured for international B2B engagement
Our intelligence-driven approach ensures you don’t just find suppliers—you onboard trusted, scalable partners aligned with your operational and strategic goals.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Stop spending weeks validating suppliers. Start closing deals with confidence.
Join hundreds of global procurement teams who rely on SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List to streamline sourcing, mitigate risk, and drive supply chain excellence.
👉 Contact us now to request your customized Pro List preview:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to discuss your category-specific needs—from consumer electronics to industrial equipment, health & wellness, and beyond.
Act now. Source smarter. Scale faster.
—
SourcifyChina | Trusted by Global Leaders in Procurement
Shenzhen • Shanghai • Global Digital Network
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
