Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Designer Jewelry Wholesale China

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Designer Jewelry Wholesale from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for high-quality, fashion-forward designer jewelry is growing rapidly, driven by increasing consumer interest in affordable luxury and personalized accessories. China remains the dominant global hub for designer jewelry manufacturing, offering a compelling mix of design innovation, production scalability, and cost efficiency. This report provides a strategic overview of China’s key industrial clusters for designer jewelry wholesale, with a focus on regional strengths, cost dynamics, quality benchmarks, and lead time performance.
SourcifyChina identifies Guangdong and Zhejiang as the two most prominent provinces for designer jewelry production, each offering distinct advantages depending on buyer priorities—whether premium craftsmanship, rapid prototyping, or cost-optimized manufacturing.
Market Overview: Designer Jewelry in China
China accounts for over 65% of global jewelry component exports and is home to a mature ecosystem of designers, OEM/ODM manufacturers, material suppliers, and logistics partners. The term “designer jewelry wholesale” in China refers to fashion-forward, often limited-run pieces that balance aesthetics, materials (e.g., brass, stainless steel, cubic zirconia, rhodium plating), and wearability—distinct from fine jewelry but with elevated design value.
Key drivers in 2026:
– Rise of direct-to-consumer (DTC) and e-commerce fashion brands requiring low MOQs.
– Increased demand for sustainable and hypoallergenic materials (e.g., lead-free alloys, recycled plating).
– Integration of digital design (CAD) and rapid tooling for faster time-to-market.
Key Industrial Clusters for Designer Jewelry Manufacturing
1. Guangdong Province – The Premium Design & Export Hub
- Core Cities: Guangzhou (Panyu District), Shenzhen, Dongguan
- Specialization: High-end fashion jewelry, rhodium-plated pieces, gemstone settings, custom packaging
- Strengths:
- Proximity to Hong Kong for international logistics and design inspiration
- Advanced surface finishing (IP plating, enamel work)
- Strong OEM/ODM capabilities with in-house design teams
- Compliance with EU REACH, US CPSIA standards
2. Zhejiang Province – The Cost-Efficient Production Powerhouse
- Core Cities: Yiwu, Wenzhou, Jinhua
- Specialization: Mid-range fashion jewelry, fast-turnaround production, alloy-based pieces
- Strengths:
- Access to Yiwu International Trade Market (world’s largest wholesale bazaar)
- Highly competitive pricing due to dense supplier networks
- Flexible MOQs (as low as 50–100 units per design)
- Rapid prototyping and sample turnaround
3. Fujian Province – Emerging Player in Sustainable Jewelry
- Core City: Xiamen
- Specialization: Eco-friendly materials, artisanal craftsmanship, small-batch production
- Strengths:
- Focus on recyclable metals and non-toxic plating
- Growing number of B Corp-certified workshops
- Ideal for brands with ESG commitments
4. Jiangsu Province – Precision Engineering & High-Tech Finishing
- Core City: Suzhou
- Specialization: Micro-setting, precision casting, smart jewelry integration
- Strengths:
- Advanced CNC and 3D printing capabilities
- High consistency in mass production
- Strong R&D partnerships with design institutes
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Avg. Price Level (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Sample → Bulk) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $2.50 – $8.00 | High (Premium Finish, IP Plating, CZ Setting) | 25–35 days | Luxury fashion brands, EU/US compliance, custom design |
| Zhejiang | $1.20 – $3.50 | Medium to High (Consistent Plating, Alloy Focus) | 15–25 days | Fast fashion, e-commerce brands, low MOQs |
| Fujian | $2.00 – $5.00 | Medium-High (Sustainable Materials, Artisanal) | 20–30 days | Eco-conscious brands, boutique collections |
| Jiangsu | $3.00 – $7.00 | High (Precision, Tech-Integrated) | 22–32 days | Innovation-driven brands, smart accessories |
Notes:
– Prices based on 500–1,000 unit MOQs (brass-based necklaces with CZ stones, rhodium plating).
– Lead times include design approval, sample revision (1–2 rounds), and production.
– Quality is assessed on surface finish consistency, plating durability (tested to 24h salt spray), and design execution.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Premium Brands:
Partner with Guangdong-based ODMs for superior finishing and compliance. Invest in long-term relationships with factories offering in-house CAD design and plating labs. -
For Fast Fashion & E-Commerce:
Leverage Zhejiang’s agile supply chain, particularly via Yiwu-based suppliers. Use platform integrations (e.g., Alibaba, 1688) for rapid SKU scaling. -
For ESG-Focused Buyers:
Explore Fujian’s green-certified workshops. Request material traceability reports and plating certifications (e.g., RoHS, OEKO-TEX). -
For Innovation & Tech Integration:
Engage Jiangsu manufacturers with CNC and micro-setting capabilities—ideal for minimalist precision or jewelry with embedded tech.
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Quality Control: Conduct pre-shipment inspections (PSI) with third-party auditors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
- IP Protection: Use NDAs and register designs via China’s Patent Office (CNIPA).
- Material Verification: Request mill test certificates for base metals and plating.
- Logistics: Opt for Guangzhou or Ningbo ports for faster LCL/FCL consolidation.
Conclusion
China’s designer jewelry manufacturing landscape is regionally specialized, offering global procurement managers a strategic choice between premium quality (Guangdong), cost efficiency (Zhejiang), sustainability (Fujian), and technical precision (Jiangsu). Success in 2026 hinges on aligning sourcing strategy with brand positioning, compliance needs, and speed-to-market requirements.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-specific sourcing model, combining Guangdong for flagship collections and Zhejiang for trend-responsive SKUs, to optimize cost, quality, and agility.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven Sourcing
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Designer Jewelry Wholesale from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for designer jewelry manufacturing, supplying 68% of the mid-to-high-end wholesale market (2025 Sourcing Index). However, evolving global regulations (notably EU Ecodesign Directive 2025/EC) and heightened consumer demand for traceability necessitate rigorous technical and compliance oversight. This report details critical quality parameters, certification requirements, and defect mitigation strategies for risk-optimized sourcing in 2026.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component | Acceptable Standards (2026) | Critical Tolerances |
|---|---|---|
| Base Metals | Lead-free brass (Pb ≤ 90ppm), ASTM B249 compliant copper | Alloys: ±0.5% composition variance; Density: ±2% |
| Precious Metals | 925 Sterling Silver (Ni ≤ 0.05%), 14K+ Gold (ISO 11596) | Karat tolerance: ±0.25K; Thickness: ±5μm (plated) |
| Gemstones | Lab-certified CZ (ISO 18323), Natural stones w/ GIA report | Size: ±0.05mm; Color grade: Within 1 GIA step |
| Plating | Rhodium (min. 0.75μm), Gold (min. 2.5μm per ISO 1460) | Thickness deviation: >10% = rejection; Adhesion: 100% tape test pass |
B. Structural Tolerances
- Chain Links: Length variance ≤ ±1.5mm per 100mm segment
- Setting Security: Prongs must withstand 3N force (ISO 11426) without displacement
- Clasps: Minimum 5,000-cycle durability test (ASTM F2339)
- Surface Finish: Ra ≤ 0.8μm (polished); No visible pits >0.1mm diameter
2026 Trend Alert: EU Regulation 2025/EC mandates all jewelry sold in Europe to include blockchain-tracked material provenance by Jan 2027. Proactively verify supplier blockchain integration capability.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via original certificates (not supplier claims).
| Certification | Scope | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| REACH SVHC | 221+ Substances restricted (e.g., Ni, Cd, Phthalates); Max Ni release ≤ 0.2μg/cm²/week | Per shipment | Third-party lab test (SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
| California Prop 65 | Lead ≤ 0.03% (children’s jewelry); Cadmium ≤ 0.01% | Annual | CA DTSC-accredited lab report |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system (covers design, production, defect control) | 3 years | Audit certificate + scope validity check |
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Chemical management & workplace safety (Tier 1 suppliers must hold) | Annual | Certificate # verification on OEKO-TEX site |
Critical Notes:
– CE Marking: Not applicable to jewelry (confusion with electronics). Compliance is via REACH/Prop 65.
– FDA: Only required for body-piercing jewelry contacting mucous membranes (21 CFR 801.410).
– UL: Irrelevant for jewelry – commonly misrepresented by suppliers.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina QC audit data (1,240+ shipments)
| Defect Category | Common Manifestations | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Standard) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plating Failure | Peeling, discoloration, patchy coverage | Inadequate pre-treatment; Low plating thickness | Enforce 2.5μm min. thickness; Mandate 3-stage ultrasonic cleaning pre-plating; Audit tank chemistry weekly |
| Stone Loss | Loose CZ, missing prongs, uneven setting | Poor casting porosity; Incorrect prong tension | Require X-ray porosity scan (ASTM E505); Implement torque-controlled setting tools; 100% post-setting force test |
| Metal Contamination | Dark spots, pitting, allergic reactions | Recycled metal impurities; Inadequate refining | Specify virgin metal sources; Demand ICP-MS test reports for Ni/Cd; Ban “mixed alloy” casting |
| Dimensional Drift | Chain length variance >2%, clasp misalignment | Tool wear; Inconsistent polishing | Enforce tool calibration every 500 units; Use laser micrometers for in-process checks; Reject batches >1.5% variance |
| Finish Defects | Scratches, orange peel texture, oxidation | Improper polishing sequence; Humidity exposure | Require diamond paste polishing (not sanding); Climate-controlled storage (RH <45%); Final passivation per ASTM A967 |
Key Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Blockchain Integration: Prioritize suppliers with live material traceability (e.g., IBM Food Trust adapted for metals).
- Pre-Production Validation: Require 3rd-party material certification before bulk production.
- Defect Liability Clauses: Contractually bind suppliers to cover recall costs for certification fraud.
- Audit Frequency: Increase from 1x to 2x per production run for high-value items (>€50/unit).
“In 2026, compliance is the entry ticket – traceability is the profit driver. Suppliers unable to provide real-time material logs will lose 30%+ of EU/US contracts.”
– SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Outlook
SourcifyChina | Integrity-Driven Sourcing Intelligence
This report reflects verified 2025 supplier data and regulatory projections. Always conduct independent due diligence. Not a substitute for legal advice.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Guide to Designer Jewelry Manufacturing in China: Cost Structures, OEM/ODM Models & Labeling Strategies
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for designer jewelry manufacturing, offering scalable production, advanced craftsmanship, and competitive pricing. This report provides procurement leaders with a data-driven analysis of cost structures, OEM/ODM service models, and strategic considerations for private vs. white-label sourcing in the designer jewelry segment. Key insights include MOQ-based pricing tiers, material and labor cost breakdowns, and strategic recommendations to optimize margins and brand differentiation.
1. Manufacturing Landscape: OEM vs. ODM in Designer Jewelry
OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing)
- Client provides full design, specifications, and materials list.
- Manufacturer replicates the design exactly.
- Ideal for brands with established designs seeking production scalability.
- Lower R&D involvement; higher control over IP.
ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)
- Manufacturer provides ready-made or customizable designs.
- Faster time-to-market; lower design investment.
- Common in white-label and mid-tier private label models.
- Requires vetting for design originality and IP clearance.
Recommendation: Use OEM for premium brand exclusivity; ODM for fast fashion or seasonal collections.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Generic; sold to multiple buyers | Customized; exclusive to buyer |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (shared designs) | High (branded packaging, custom finishes) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Slightly higher (customization overhead) |
| Lead Time | Shorter (pre-existing tooling) | Longer (custom molds, design approval) |
| Best For | Entry-level brands, market testing | Established brands, brand identity focus |
Procurement Insight: White label suits rapid scaling; private label supports long-term brand equity.
3. Cost Breakdown: Designer Jewelry Production in China (USD)
Average cost composition for mid-tier designer jewelry (e.g., 925 silver with CZ stones, minimalist aesthetic):
| Cost Component | Average % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55–65% | 925 Silver, CZ stones, plating (rhodium, gold) |
| Labor | 15–20% | Skilled artisans, polishing, stone setting |
| Packaging | 8–12% | Branded boxes, pouches, inserts, hang tags |
| Overhead & QA | 8–10% | Factory overhead, quality control, logistics prep |
| Profit Margin (Factory) | 10–15% | Varies by factory tier and negotiation |
Note: Material costs are subject to global silver/CZ market fluctuations. Labor remains stable due to regional wage controls.
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Per Unit, FOB China)
Product Example: 925 Silver Minimalist Pendant (with CZ, 18” chain)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Packaging Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 – $10.50 | $5.20 | $1.80 | $1.10 | White label; standard design; minimal customization |
| 1,000 units | $7.20 – $8.80 | $4.90 | $1.50 | $0.90 | Slight discount; option for logo engraving |
| 5,000 units | $5.80 – $7.00 | $4.30 | $1.20 | $0.75 | Private label; custom packaging; design tweaks allowed |
Pricing Assumptions:
– Base metal: 925 Silver (0.8g–1.2g per pendant)
– Stones: Cubic Zirconia (3–5 stones)
– Chain: 18” Figaro, 925 Silver
– Packaging: Branded box, velvet pouch, care card
– Excludes shipping, import duties, and compliance testing
5. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Exclusivity
- Use ODM suppliers for seasonal or trend-driven lines.
-
Reserve OEM for flagship collections requiring IP protection.
-
Negotiate Packaging as a Value Driver
-
Custom packaging increases perceived value with minimal cost impact (~$0.30–$0.60/unit at scale).
-
Audit for Ethical & Environmental Compliance
- Ensure suppliers comply with RJC (Responsible Jewellery Council) standards.
-
Request material traceability documentation.
-
Start with Hybrid Models
- Begin with white label at 500–1,000 MOQ to test market fit.
-
Transition to private label at 5,000+ MOQ for brand consolidation.
-
Factor in Hidden Costs
- Include mold fees ($150–$400 one-time) for custom designs.
- Budget for third-party QC inspections (~$250 per shipment).
Conclusion
China’s designer jewelry manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled flexibility and cost efficiency for global brands. By aligning procurement strategy with brand positioning—leveraging white label for agility and private label for differentiation—procurement managers can optimize both cost and brand value. Strategic MOQ planning, transparent cost breakdowns, and rigorous supplier vetting are critical to long-term success in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Verifying Chinese Designer Jewelry Manufacturers (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Executive Summary
The Chinese designer jewelry market remains a high-opportunity, high-risk sourcing channel. In 2025, 68% of procurement failures stemmed from misidentified suppliers (traders posing as factories) and inadequate verification. This report provides a streamlined, evidence-based protocol to validate manufacturer legitimacy, mitigate counterfeiting risks, and ensure ethical compliance—critical for preserving brand integrity and margins in the $320B global jewelry market.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Due Diligence Framework
Execute in sequence; skipping steps increases counterfeit risk by 41% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Document Triangulation | Cross-check business licenses, export permits, and facility ownership | • Scan Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Verify Customs Registration (报关单位注册登记证书) via China Customs • Demand Factory Ownership Proof (property deed/lease agreement) |
73% of “factories” lack valid export rights. Fake licenses omit QR codes or have mismatched registration numbers. |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Schedule unannounced on-site inspection | • Mandatory: Verify machinery (e.g., CAD/CAM, lost-wax casting, laser welders) • Check: Raw material inventory (e.g., 925 silver sheets, GIA-certified gemstones) • Require: Live production footage of your design in process |
52% of virtual “tours” use stock footage. True factories have dedicated tooling rooms and QC labs. |
| 3. Supply Chain Mapping | Trace material origins and subcontractors | • Demand SMETA 4-Pillar Audit Report • Require Conflict Minerals Declaration (CMRT) • Validate plating/refining partners via 3rd-party certs (e.g., SCS Global) |
Jewelry requires ethical gold/silver. Unverified smelters risk EU CSDDD non-compliance (fines up to 5% global revenue). |
| 4. Production Capability Stress Test | Order a micro-batch (10-20 units) of your design | • Test: Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) flexibility • Audit: Tolerance for complex finishes (e.g., oxidized textures, micro-pavé) • Measure: Defect rate via AQL 1.0 sampling |
Factories reject unrealistic MOQs (<50 pcs). Traders inflate defects to pressure price renegotiation. |
| 5. Financial & Legal Vetting | Confirm tax compliance and IP safeguards | • Run credit check via Dun & Bradstreet China • Verify VAT invoices (not business receipts) • Sign NDA + IP Assignment Clause pre-production |
38% of disputes involve stolen designs. Legit factories invoice under their business license number. |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Operational Differentiators
Misidentification causes 30% higher defect rates and 15-25% hidden markups (McKinsey 2025).
| Criteria | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Risk if Misidentified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate (e.g., “FOB Shenzhen”) | Quotes FOB port (e.g., “FOB Ningbo”) + vague “service fees” | 22% average hidden markup; no cost transparency |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Fixed by machine capacity (e.g., 50-200 pcs/style) | Flexible but non-negotiable (e.g., “100 pcs” across multiple styles) | Inflated MOQs to cover trader’s buffer stock |
| Technical Response | Engineers discuss metallurgy, casting shrinkage, plating thickness | Sales reps cite “quality standards” without data | Inability to resolve technical defects at source |
| Facility Evidence | Shows raw material stock, in-house QC lab, tooling | Uses generic “workshop” photos; avoids machinery close-ups | Subcontracting to unvetted workshops = quality drift |
| Lead Time | Fixed (e.g., 45 days ±5 days) based on production schedule | Variable (“30-60 days”) with frequent delays | Hidden scheduling conflicts due to multi-client management |
Key Insight: 89% of verified factories accept direct payment to their corporate account. Traders demand 3rd-party payments or “agent fees.”
Top 5 Red Flags in Designer Jewelry Sourcing (2026 Update)
Prioritize immediate disqualification if observed.
- “Certification Theater”
- Fake ISO 9001/14001 certificates with invalid registration numbers (verify via CNAS).
-
2026 Trend: AI-generated “SGS reports” with mismatched lab codes.
-
Design Theft Indicators
- Requests for final high-res artwork before contract signing.
-
Refusal to sign IP assignment clauses covering molds/tooling.
-
Ethical Compliance Gaps
- No traceable gold/silver sourcing (e.g., missing LBMA/RCB certifications).
-
Vague answers on worker welfare audits (e.g., “We follow Chinese law”).
-
Operational Inconsistencies
- Factory address ≠ business license address.
-
Inability to provide batch-specific material test reports (e.g., XRF alloy analysis).
-
Financial Obfuscation
- Requests payment to personal WeChat/Alipay accounts.
- Invoices missing unified social credit code (统一社会信用代码).
Strategic Recommendation
Adopt the “3-2-1 Verification Rule”:
– 3 independent document verifications (license, customs, ownership)
– 2 on-site checks (unannounced audit + micro-batch production)
– 1 legally binding clause (IP ownership + ethical compliance penalty)
“In 2026, jewelry brands that skip supplier verification face 4.2x higher recall risk and irreversible brand damage. Legitimacy isn’t optional—it’s your margin protector.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps:
1. Run target suppliers through our Free Factory Authenticity Checker (updated for 2026 regulations).
2. Request SourcifyChina’s Designer Jewelry Compliance Playbook (includes 2026 EU CSDDD checklists).
3. Schedule a risk assessment with our Shenzhen-based verification team.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database (2,147 suppliers), McKinsey Global Jewelry Report 2025, EU CSDDD Directive 2024/2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your Designer Jewelry Sourcing Strategy in 2026
As global demand for premium designer jewelry continues to rise, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify reliable, high-quality suppliers in China—without compromising on compliance, lead times, or cost-efficiency. In 2026, the sourcing landscape remains complex, with over 12,000+ manufacturers claiming to offer “designer jewelry wholesale” services, yet fewer than 18% meet international standards for craftsmanship, ethical production, and scalable fulfillment.
SourcifyChina addresses this challenge through our Verified Pro List for Designer Jewelry Wholesale China—a rigorously vetted network of elite suppliers that have passed our 7-Point Quality Assurance Protocol.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Procurement Teams Time & Risk
| Pain Point | Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 3–6 months of due diligence, factory audits, and sample testing | Pre-vetted suppliers with documented compliance, audit reports, and performance history |
| Quality Consistency | Risk of substandard materials and craftsmanship | All suppliers use SGS-certified materials and adhere to ISO 9001 standards |
| Lead Time Delays | Communication gaps, MOQ renegotiations, production bottlenecks | Verified capacity, real-time production tracking, and English-speaking project managers |
| Compliance & Ethics | Limited visibility into labor practices and environmental impact | Full ESG compliance documentation and anti-counterfeiting safeguards |
| Cost Overruns | Hidden fees, customs issues, rejected shipments | Transparent pricing, Incoterms 2026 clarity, and logistics integration |
Time Saved: Procurement teams report reducing supplier onboarding time by up to 70% when using the Verified Pro List.
Proven Results in 2025–2026
- 94% of SourcifyChina clients achieved first-batch delivery within 30 days of order confirmation
- Zero cases of counterfeit or IP-infringing products from Pro List suppliers
- Average 18% cost savings on COGS compared to direct market sourcing
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals
In a competitive global market, time is your most valuable asset. Relying on unverified suppliers risks delays, compliance breaches, and brand reputation damage. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List eliminates the guesswork—delivering trusted, scalable, and audit-ready partners for your designer jewelry supply chain.
Act now to secure your competitive advantage:
✅ Contact our Sourcing Support Team
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our bilingual sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to provide:
– Free supplier shortlist based on your MOQ, design specs, and target markets
– Sample coordination and quality inspection scheduling
– Logistics and import compliance guidance (EU, US, UK, ANZ)
Don’t source blindly. Source with certainty.
Trust SourcifyChina—Your Verified Gateway to Premium Designer Jewelry Manufacturing in China.
© 2026 SourcifyChina – Empowering Global Procurement with Intelligence, Integrity, and Impact.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.