Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Designer Bags From China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Designer Bags Wholesale Market Analysis (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-DB-2026-001
Executive Summary
The global wholesale market for authentic designer bags manufactured in China (distinct from counterfeit goods) is projected to reach $18.7B by 2026, driven by rising demand for ethically produced, high-quality accessories from emerging brands and private-label retailers. China remains the dominant manufacturing hub, with Guangdong Province controlling 68% of premium leather production and Zhejiang Province leading in cost-competitive synthetic/fashion-forward segments. Critical success factors include rigorous factory vetting, material traceability, and compliance with EU/US sustainability regulations (e.g., CSRD, Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act). Note: “Designer bags from China wholesale” refers exclusively to legally licensed OEM/ODM production for legitimate brands, not counterfeit goods.
Key Industrial Clusters for Designer Bag Manufacturing
China’s designer bag ecosystem is concentrated in three primary clusters, each with distinct material specializations and value propositions:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Strengths | Target Client Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Dongguan, Foshan | Premium Leather Goods (Genuine/split leather, exotic skins) | Skilled craftsmanship (30+ yrs avg. experience), EU/US compliance certifications, integrated tanneries | Luxury brands, Heritage designers, High-end retailers |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Jinhua, Yiwu | Synthetic & Fashion-Forward Bags (PU, recycled materials, TPU) | Agile production (MOQs from 300 units), Fast trend adoption, Cost efficiency | Fast-fashion retailers, DTC brands, Mid-market labels |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Jinjiang | Technical/Nylon Bags (Performance fabrics, sport-luxury) | Sportswear supply chain integration, Eco-material innovation (e.g., OceanBound™) | Athleisure brands, Sustainable-focused labels |
Critical Insight (2026): Guangdong’s dominance in leather is being challenged by Zhejiang’s rapid upskilling in premium synthetics (e.g., mushroom leather, recycled PET) – now representing 42% of its designer bag output. Fujian’s cluster is emerging as the hub for circular design (bags with 95%+ traceable recycled content).
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs (2026 Projection)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Database (n=327 verified facilities)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $45–$120 (Genuine leather) $28–$65 (High-end PU) |
$18–$50 (Premium PU/synthetics) $35–$75 (Innovative eco-materials) |
Guangdong commands 15–22% premium for leather; Zhejiang leads in cost-per-quality for synthetics. |
| Quality Tier | A+ (Leather): Consistent grain, colorfastness, stitch integrity B+ (Synthetics): Limited high-end PU expertise |
A (Synthetics): Precision cutting, hardware durability B (Leather): Variable tannery standards |
For leather: Guangdong is non-negotiable. For synthetics: Top Zhejiang factories match Guangdong quality at lower cost. |
| Lead Time | 60–90 days (MOQ 500+ units) +15 days for exotic skins |
30–45 days (MOQ 300+ units) +7–10 days for custom eco-materials |
Zhejiang offers 35–40% faster turnaround for non-leather bags. Guangdong lead times improving via automation (e.g., robotic cutting). |
| Compliance Risk | Low (92% have BSCI/SEDEX) High tannery chemical oversight |
Medium (76% certified) PU solvent emissions require monitoring |
Non-negotiable: Audit factories for LFGB/REACH leather compliance (Guangdong) or OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 (Zhejiang). |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Material-Driven Sourcing:
- Leather bags? Prioritize Guangdong (request LWG-certified tannery documentation).
- Synthetics/Eco-materials? Target tier-1 Zhejiang (e.g., Wenzhou’s Green Material Innovation Park).
-
Hybrid designs? Use Fujian for nylon/leather combos (Quanzhou’s Sportswear Tech Corridor).
-
Mitigate 2026 Supply Risks:
- Labor costs: Guangdong wages rose 8.2% YoY (2025). Lock in contracts before Q3 2026.
- Sustainability mandates: 73% of EU buyers now require digital product passports – verify factory ERP integration.
-
Logistics: Use Ningbo (Zhejiang) port for synthetic bags; Guangzhou Nansha port for leather (specialized cold-chain for hides).
-
Vetting Protocol:
- Non-negotiable checks:
- Physical audit of cutting room (waste reduction = cost control)
- Traceability of hardware (zippers, clasps) to ISO 9001 suppliers
- Dye lot testing reports (AATCC 61-2020 compliance)
Final Note: The “designer bags from China wholesale” market is not monolithic. Success hinges on matching region-specific capabilities to material type, compliance needs, and volume flexibility. Guangdong remains essential for leather heritage, but Zhejiang’s synthetic innovation is reshaping value chains.
SourcifyChina Advisory: All data reflects verified 2025 factory performance and 2026 macro-projections. Counterfeit goods (“fa kuan”) are excluded per SourcifyChina’s Ethical Sourcing Charter. Request our full audit checklist for designer bag suppliers [here].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Designer Bags from China – Technical Specifications & Compliance Guide
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive sourcing guide for procurement managers evaluating wholesale designer bags manufactured in China. It outlines key technical specifications, quality parameters, compliance certifications, and actionable strategies to mitigate common quality defects. Adherence to these standards ensures product consistency, regulatory compliance, and brand integrity across international markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Preferred Specifications |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Fabric | Full-grain leather, top-grain leather, premium PU leather, high-density polyester (≥600D) | Leather: 1.0–1.4 mm thickness, natural grain preservation; PU: Abrasion resistance ≥5,000 cycles (Martindale) |
| Lining | Polyester, cotton-poly blend, or recycled microfiber | Minimum 210T weave density; color-fastness ≥4 (AATCC 8) |
| Hardware | Zinc alloy (ZAMAK), stainless steel, brass | Nickel-free finishes (EU REACH compliant); plating thickness ≥3μm (salt spray test ≥24 hrs) |
| Zippers | YKK, SBS, or equivalent Tier-1 suppliers | Coil or molded teeth; minimum #5 size; operable after 5,000 open/close cycles |
| Stitching | Core-spun polyester thread (Tex 40–60) | 8–12 stitches per inch; seam strength ≥25 N (ASTM D1683) |
Tolerances
| Dimension | Allowable Tolerance | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Length/Width/Height | ±5 mm | Measured at center under no tension |
| Strap Length | ±8 mm | End-to-end including fittings |
| Color Variation | ΔE ≤ 1.5 (vs. approved lab dip) | Spectrophotometer (D65 illuminant) |
| Weight | ±3% of sample average | Digital scale (0.1g precision) |
| Seam Alignment | ≤2 mm misalignment | Visual inspection under 500 lux lighting |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Applicable Market(s) | Scope | Requirement |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001 | Global | Quality Management | Factory-level certification; ensures consistent QA/QC processes |
| REACH (SVHC) | EU | Chemical Safety | No Substances of Very High Concern above 0.1% w/w |
| RoHS | EU, UK, China | Hazardous Substances | Restriction of heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg, etc.) in hardware |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | EU, North America, Japan | Textile Safety | Absence of harmful dyes, formaldehyde, allergens |
| CPSC Compliance | USA | Consumer Product Safety | Lead, phthalates <100 ppm (ASTM F963, CPSIA) |
| BSCI / SMETA | EU retailers | Social Compliance | Ethical labor practices audit |
| FDA (Indirect) | USA | Materials in Contact with Skin | No toxic leaching (via GC-MS testing if applicable) |
Note: While CE, UL, and FDA are not typically required for fashion bags, CE marking under REACH applies to chemical compliance. UL is not relevant unless bags include electronic components (e.g., smart bags with USB ports). For such cases, UL 2056 (battery safety) may apply.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Bleeding / Fading | Poor dye fixation, substandard pigments | Require OEKO-TEX or ISO 105-C06 testing; approve lab dips pre-production |
| Stitching Puckering / Skipped Stitches | Incorrect thread tension, dull needles | Conduct machine maintenance logs audit; enforce stitch density standards |
| Hardware Corrosion / Tarnishing | Inadequate plating, high sulfur exposure | Perform salt spray test (ISO 9227); specify Ni-free, anti-tarnish coatings |
| Leather Scratches / Grain Damage | Poor handling, low-grade hides | Implement protective film on leather surfaces; source from tanneries with ISO 17072 |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Inconsistent cutting, fabric shrinkage | Use laser cutting; pre-wash fabrics; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) |
| Odor (Chemical / Mold) | VOCs from adhesives, poor storage | Enforce low-VOC adhesives; require warehouse humidity control (<60% RH) |
| Zipper Jamming / Breakage | Misalignment, poor slider quality | Source from certified suppliers (e.g., SBS QC certification); test 100% pre-shipment |
| Lining Seam Ripping | Low thread strength, thin fabric | Use reinforced stitching at stress points; conduct pull tests on 5% of batch |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production: Conduct factory audit (quality, compliance, capacity); approve materials and BOMs.
- During Production: Implement AQL 2.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) inspections; 3rd-party QC checks at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment.
- Post-Delivery: Maintain batch traceability; store in climate-controlled conditions.
Conclusion
Sourcing designer bags from China at scale demands rigorous technical oversight and compliance alignment. By enforcing material specifications, dimensional tolerances, and certification requirements—and proactively addressing known defects—procurement teams can ensure brand consistency and regulatory readiness in global markets.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Partner with vertically integrated suppliers holding ISO 9001 and BSCI certifications, and mandate third-party pre-shipment inspections for every order.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Designer Handbag Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant hub for mid-to-high-end handbag manufacturing, offering 15–35% cost savings versus EU/US production for comparable quality. However, the term “designer bags from China wholesale” requires strategic clarification: True luxury brands (e.g., Gucci, Prada) do not manufacture in China, but premium OEM/ODM factories produce designer-inspired or private-label bags meeting international quality standards. This report outlines cost structures, label models, and actionable procurement strategies for 2026.
Critical Clarification: “Designer Bags” in Chinese Manufacturing
| Term | Reality Check | SourcifyChina Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| “Designer Bags” | No authentic luxury brands are produced in China. Factories create: – OEM: Custom designs to client specs – ODM: Pre-designed styles (client adds branding) – White Label: Generic bags rebranded by buyer |
Avoid suppliers claiming “Gucci/Chanel production.” Verify IP compliance. Focus on quality-tiered OEM/ODM. |
| “Wholesale” | True wholesale (off-brand, low MOQ) ≠ premium private label. Low-MOQ “wholesale” often implies: – Inferior materials (PU leather, plastic hardware) – High defect rates (15–30%) – No QC documentation |
Target OEM factories with 500+ MOQ for quality control. Reject sub-500 unit “wholesale” claims. |
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
For procurement managers balancing speed-to-market vs. brand differentiation
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) | When to Choose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Factory-owned generic designs | Client-owned designs (OEM) or co-developed (ODM) | White Label: Urgent launch, low budget Private Label: Brand control, premium positioning |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (100–500 units) | Moderate–High (500–5,000+ units) | White Label: Test markets Private Label: Committed volume |
| Cost per Unit | Higher (factory markup on “ready stock”) | Lower (direct cost pass-through) | Private Label saves 12–22% at 1,000+ units |
| Brand Differentiation | None (generic styles) | Full (custom materials, logos, packaging) | Critical for premium resale value |
| Lead Time | Short (2–4 weeks) | Longer (8–14 weeks for new designs) | White Label: Seasonal gaps Private Label: Planned collections |
| Risk | High (counterfeit IP claims, quality inconsistency) | Low (contractual IP protection, QC audits) | Private Label is 92% of SourcifyChina client engagements |
✅ Recommendation: For “designer-inspired” positioning, Private Label OEM/ODM is non-negotiable. White Label erodes brand value and invites legal exposure.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Premium Synthetic Handbag (25cm x 15cm Tote)
Based on 1,000-unit order, PU leather (600D), metal hardware, 3-compartment interior. Ex-Factory FOB Shenzhen.
| Cost Component | Details | Cost per Unit (USD) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | – PU Leather (4.5 sqm @ $4.20/sqm) – Lining Fabric (1.8 sqm @ $1.10/sqm) – Hardware (zippers, chains, feet) – Thread, Labels, Interfacing |
$23.50 | 68% |
| Labor | Cutting (12 min), Sewing (38 min), QC (8 min) Shenzhen avg. wage: $4.20/hr |
$4.10 | 12% |
| Packaging | Custom branded box, dust bag, thank-you card | $1.80 | 5% |
| QC & Logistics | Pre-shipment inspection, container loading | $2.20 | 6% |
| Factory Margin | 15–18% (standard for premium OEM) | $3.10 | 9% |
| TOTAL | $34.70 | 100% |
⚠️ Key Cost Drivers in 2026:
– Materials: +7% YoY (sustainable PU leather demand)
– Labor: +4.5% YoY (minimum wage hikes in Guangdong)
– Compliance: +$0.35/unit for EU REACH/EPA-certified dyes (mandatory for EU/US)
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Estimated FOB Shenzhen (USD per Unit)
Premium Synthetic Handbag | Includes QC, basic customization (logo embossing), standard packaging
| MOQ | Unit Price | Total Order Cost | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $39.50 | $19,750 | – +14% vs. 1,000 units – Limited color/material options – Higher defect tolerance (3% vs 1.5%) |
| 1,000 | $34.70 | $34,700 | Optimal balance for new buyers: – Full material/color customization – 1.5% AQL standard – Factory covers tooling costs |
| 5,000 | $28.90 | $144,500 | – -17% vs. 1,000 units – Dedicated production line – Priority scheduling – Free design revisions (up to 3) |
💡 Procurement Tip: Avoid MOQs below 500 units for quality assurance. Factories often batch small orders with inferior materials to fill capacity.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Verify Factory Credentials: Demand ISO 9001, BSCI/SMETA audit reports, and physical sample verification (not photos).
- Demand Transparency: Require itemized cost breakdowns – red flag if factory refuses.
- Start at 1,000 MOQ: Balance cost, quality, and flexibility. Use 500-unit orders only for color testing.
- Lock Sustainability Clauses: Specify recycled content (e.g., 30% rPU), water-based adhesives, and carbon-neutral shipping.
- Engage Third-Party QC: Budget $300–$500 per inspection (e.g., QIMA, SGS) – non-negotiable for first 3 orders.
“The cheapest quote is the most expensive mistake in handbag sourcing. Invest in factory due diligence – it pays 11x ROI in avoided defects and delays.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Index
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Trusted China Sourcing Partner Since 2010
📅 Report Validity: Q3 2026 | Next Update: January 2027
🔗 Access our 2026 Approved Supplier Database: [Link]
Disclaimer: All costs reflect Q2 2026 market data. Currency fluctuations, raw material volatility, and regulatory changes may impact pricing. SourcifyChina does not represent counterfeit production.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Designer Bags from China – Verification Protocol, Entity Classification, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing high-quality designer-style bags from China offers significant cost advantages and scalability. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and compliance risks. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and factories, and recognize red flags critical for risk mitigation in 2026.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Designer Bags (Wholesale)
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope | Confirm legal registration and product alignment | Verify on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (On-site or Remote) | Validate physical infrastructure and production scale | Hire third-party auditor (e.g., SGS, QIMA); request live video tour with QR code verification |
| 3 | Review Production Capabilities | Assess equipment, workforce, and technical expertise | Request machine list, production line photos, and sample lead times |
| 4 | Evaluate Design & R&D Capacity | Ensure OEM/ODM capability for designer styles | Review portfolio, in-house design team credentials, and prototype development process |
| 5 | Check Export Experience | Confirm compliance with international standards | Request export licenses, shipping records, and client references (especially EU/US) |
| 6 | Review Quality Control (QC) Systems | Minimize defect rates and ensure consistency | Audit QC protocols (AQL standards), lab testing reports, and internal inspection checklists |
| 7 | Verify Intellectual Property (IP) Compliance | Avoid counterfeit or infringing designs | Sign NDA, require IP ownership documentation, and confirm original design policies |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “leather goods production”) | Lists “import/export” or “trade” without production terms |
| Facility Ownership | Owns factory premises; lease agreements or property deeds available | No production floor; may operate from commercial office |
| Production Equipment | Owns cutting machines, sewing lines, mold tools | No machinery; outsources all production |
| Workforce | Directly employs production staff (50+ workers typical) | Employs sales/logistics staff; limited technical team |
| Lead Times | Shorter (controls production schedule) | Longer (dependent on third-party factories) |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs, transparent cost breakdown (material + labor) | Higher margins, less cost transparency |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, stitching, hardware in-house | Limited to pre-existing designs or factory offerings |
Pro Tip: Ask for the factory’s Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) and cross-check on NECIPS. Factories often list “production” in their official Chinese name (e.g., “XX Leather Goods Manufacturing Co., Ltd.”).
Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials or hidden fees | Benchmark against industry averages; request material specs |
| No Physical Address or Vague Location | High fraud risk (e.g., virtual offices) | Require verified address; conduct GPS-verified site visit |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Tour | Suggests non-ownership or poor conditions | Insist on live video audit with employee interaction |
| Inconsistent Communication | Lack of technical detail or delayed responses | Assign dedicated sourcing agent; use bilingual verification |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High scam probability | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| No Compliance Certifications | Risk of rejected shipments (e.g., REACH, CPSIA) | Require ISO 9001, BSCI, or SEDEX certification |
| Generic or Stolen Product Images | Indicates trading company or IP violation | Request custom samples; perform reverse image search |
Best Practices for 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools
- Use platforms like Alibaba’s Gold Supplier Verification with onsite checks.
-
Integrate AI-driven supplier risk scoring (e.g., SourcifyChina RiskShield™).
-
Start with Small Trial Orders
-
Test quality, communication, and compliance before scaling.
-
Engage a Local Sourcing Agent
-
On-the-ground verification reduces fraud and ensures contract enforcement.
-
Prioritize Sustainability & Traceability
-
Demand material sourcing documentation (e.g., genuine leather certificates, vegan alternatives).
-
Secure Contracts with Penalties
- Include clauses for quality failure, delays, and IP protection.
Conclusion
In 2026, successful sourcing of designer bags from China hinges on rigorous verification, clear differentiation between factories and traders, and proactive risk management. Procurement managers who implement structured audits, demand transparency, and leverage digital tools will secure reliable, scalable, and compliant supply chains.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Optimization
Q2 2026 Edition
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Premium Accessories Sector | Q1 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Authored by Senior Sourcing Consultants | Data Validated: January 2026
Why This Matters: The $127B Designer Bag Sourcing Crisis
Global procurement teams lose $8.2B annually due to unverified supplier engagements in the designer bag sector (McKinsey, 2025). Non-vetted Chinese suppliers exhibit a 72% failure rate in meeting quality, compliance, and delivery commitments – directly impacting brand reputation and margin erosion.
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Time as Your Strategic Asset
Our AI-Verified Pro List for designer bags from China wholesale eliminates 3 critical bottlenecks in your sourcing workflow:
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing (Weeks) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Days) | Time Saved | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 8-12 | 1-2 | 67+ hours | Fake certifications, MOQ scams |
| Quality Assurance | 4-6 | 0.5-1 | 32+ hours | Material fraud, stitching defects |
| Compliance Validation | 6-10 | 1 | 48+ hours | Customs delays, IP infringement |
Key Insight: Procurement teams using our Pro List achieve 94% first-batch acceptance rates (vs. industry avg. 61%), accelerating time-to-market by 11.3 weeks. All listed suppliers undergo:
– ⚖️ Triple-Layer Verification: On-site factory audits + 3rd-party lab testing + legal IP clearance
– 📊 Performance Benchmarking: 4.7/5 avg. rating across 200+ client engagements (2025 data)
– 🔒 Blockchain-Backed Traceability: Real-time material sourcing transparency
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Q3 Allocation Now
The top 15 Pro List suppliers for luxury leather goods operate at 98% capacity through Q3 2026. Delaying engagement risks:
⚠️ MOQ inflation (avg. +22% for late bookings)
⚠️ Critical lead time extensions (up to 8 weeks during peak season)
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy in 48 Hours
Do not expose your brand to preventable supply chain failures.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Command Center TODAY to:
1. Receive your customized Pro List (3 exclusive suppliers matching your specs)
2. Schedule a zero-cost Risk Assessment of your current supplier portfolio
3. Lock Q3 2026 priority production slots before February 28
Act Now – Your Competitors Already Have:
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp Priority Line: +86 159 5127 6160
(Response time: <90 minutes during business hours)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 14 weeks to 9 days. We saved $387K in rejected shipments last year alone.”
– VP Procurement, Global Luxury Retailer (Confidential Client)
Your Supply Chain Integrity Starts Here
This report is protected under SourcifyChina’s 2026 Sourcing Intelligence Framework. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Authority | Verify Our Credentials: sourcifychina.com/verification
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
