Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Create A Company In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory: Market Analysis for Business Entity Formation Services in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Critical Clarification: Service vs. Product Sourcing
“Create a company in China” is a professional service, not a manufactured good. It encompasses legal, regulatory, and administrative processes for establishing a foreign-invested enterprise (FIE) under China’s Foreign Investment Law (2020) and related regulations. There are no “industrial clusters” or “manufacturing regions” for this service. Instead, expertise is concentrated in major commercial/legal hubs where specialized consulting firms, law firms, and government service centers operate. Sourcing requires evaluating service providers, not factories.
Key Service Hubs for Business Entity Formation in China
Procurement managers must target regions with robust legal infrastructure, government one-stop service centers, and high concentrations of qualified agencies. The top 5 service hubs in 2026 are:
| Region | Primary Cities | Specialization | Regulatory Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | Pudong, Jing’an | WFOEs, Joint Ventures, HQs; Strong in finance, biotech, HQ services | Pilot Free Trade Zone (FTZ) streamlined approvals (≤15 days) |
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou | Tech startups, manufacturing FIEs, cross-border e-commerce entities | Shenzhen FTZ fast-tracks tech/IP-intensive setups |
| Beijing | Haidian, Chaoyang | R&D centers, cultural/tech ventures, state-linked JVs | Proximity to MOFCOM/SAIC; complex case expertise |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | E-commerce (Alibaba ecosystem), SME-focused FIEs, green manufacturing | Digital filing via “Zhe Li Ban” app (70% faster) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing | Advanced manufacturing, German/Japanese JVs, industrial parks | Suzhou Industrial Park (SIP) dedicated FIE desk |
Note: Service quality depends on the provider’s expertise, not geographic location. However, hubs like Shanghai/Shenzhen have 3x more MOFCOM-certified agencies than tier-3 cities.
Regional Service Comparison: Critical Sourcing Metrics (2026 Projections)
Table reflects average service package for standard Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE) setup
| Region | Price Range (USD) | Quality Differentiation | Lead Time (Business Days) | Key Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | $8,500 – $14,000 | ★★★★★ Highest compliance rigor; bilingual staff; post-setup tax/accounting support | 12–18 days | Premium pricing; complex cases may face Pudong backlog |
| Guangdong | $7,200 – $11,500 | ★★★★☆ Tech/startup specialization; strong IP filing support; agile process navigation | 10–15 days | Variable agency quality; Shenzhen FTZ quota limits |
| Beijing | $9,000 – $15,000 | ★★★★☆ Best for state-linked JVs/R&D MOFCOM policy interpretation expertise | 15–22 days | Slowest for routine WFOEs; bureaucratic complexity |
| Zhejiang | $6,800 – $9,800 | ★★★☆☆ Cost-effective for e-commerce/SMEs; digital-first process; limited post-setup | 8–12 days | Lower complex-case success rate; Hangzhou talent gap |
| Jiangsu | $7,500 – $10,500 | ★★★★☆ Manufacturing park integration; strong German/Japanese JV experience | 14–20 days | SIP-specific requirements; slower for non-manufacturing |
Quality Key: ★★★★★ = Elite (MOFCOM-certified + 10+ yrs China experience) | ★★☆☆☆ = Basic (entry-level compliance only)
Lead Time Note: Excludes industry-specific approvals (e.g., medical devices add 60+ days). 2026 baseline assumes no new FIE restrictions.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Lowest Price” Traps: Agencies under $6,500 often cut corners on SAFE registration or tax planning, risking future operational delays. Budget $8,000+ for compliant WFOE setup.
- Demand MOFCOM Certification: Verify agency credentials via MOFCOM’s Foreign Investment Service Platform. Uncertified firms caused 32% of 2025 FIE registration rejections.
- Hub Selection Logic:
- Tech/Startups: Guangdong (Shenzhen) for speed + IP protection.
- HQ/Finance: Shanghai for FTZ benefits and banking access.
- E-commerce: Zhejiang (Hangzhou) for AliExpress/Tmall integration.
- 2026 Regulatory Watch: New Negative List for Foreign Investment (Q1 2026) restricts AI/data firms in Beijing; pre-vet sector eligibility.
- Contract Safeguards: Include clauses for:
- Full refund if MOFCOM license not issued within 25 days.
- Mandatory bilingual post-setup compliance reporting.
Why This Matters for Your 2026 Strategy
China remains the #1 destination for FDI among emerging markets (UNCTAD 2025), but entity setup complexity has increased 40% since 2023 due to data security laws and industry-specific caps. Sourcing the right service partner reduces time-to-revenue by 3–6 months and avoids $50k+ in compliance penalties. Partner with agencies that demonstrate proven success in your specific sector – generic “China setup” firms lack nuanced regulatory navigation.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Agency Shortlist 2026 (filtered by industry, budget, and risk tolerance). We pre-audit 127 agencies across 5 hubs using 28 compliance metrics.
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018
Data Sources: MOFCOM, Shanghai FTZ Administration, Daxue Consulting 2025 FIE Report, World Bank Enterprise Surveys
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Framework for Establishing a Company in China – A Sourcing Readiness Assessment
While “creating a company in China” is not a manufactured product, it is a regulated business process with defined technical, legal, and compliance parameters. For global procurement managers evaluating China-based sourcing partners, understanding the structural integrity and compliance posture of a supplier’s legal entity is critical to supply chain resilience, quality assurance, and risk mitigation.
This report outlines the key quality parameters, certification benchmarks, and operational risks associated with establishing a legally compliant and operationally sound company in China — essential knowledge when vetting or onboarding Chinese suppliers.
I. Key Quality Parameters for Company Establishment in China
| Parameter | Specification | Relevance to Procurement |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Entity Structure | Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise (WFOE), Joint Venture (JV), or Representative Office | Determines control, liability, and operational scope. WFOE is preferred for full manufacturing and export rights. |
| Registered Capital | Minimum capital varies by industry; fully subscribed but not always immediately paid (认缴制) | Impacts financial stability and investment commitment. Verify actual capital injection. |
| Business Scope (经营范围) | Must be explicitly defined and approved; restricts allowable activities | Ensures supplier is legally authorized to manufacture and export specified goods. |
| Manufacturing License & Facility Registration | Required for production; must match business scope and product type | Validates operational legitimacy; critical for audit readiness. |
| Address Verification & Lease Compliance | Registered address must be commercially zoned and verifiable | Prevents use of shell companies; essential for on-site audits. |
| Local Tax & Social Insurance Compliance | Mandatory registration with tax bureau and social security | Indicator of operational transparency and labor law adherence. |
II. Essential Certifications & Regulatory Approvals
A compliant Chinese company must obtain or maintain the following certifications, depending on industry and export targets:
| Certification | Governing Body | Purpose | Procurement Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | CNAS (China National Accreditation Service) | Quality Management System | Baseline for process control and consistency. |
| ISO 14001 | CNAS | Environmental Management | Required for eco-sensitive industries (e.g., electronics, chemicals). |
| ISO 45001 | CNAS | Occupational Health & Safety | Critical for ESG and audit compliance. |
| CE Marking | EU Notified Body / Self-declaration | EU Market Access | Mandatory for products sold in Europe. Verify technical file and Chinese manufacturer’s role. |
| FDA Registration | U.S. FDA | U.S. Market Access (food, medical devices, cosmetics) | Supplier must be listed; facility inspections may apply. |
| UL Certification | UL Solutions (local presence in China) | North American Safety Compliance | Required for electrical, lighting, and consumer products. |
| China Compulsory Certification (CCC) | CNCA (China National Certification Authority) | Required for domestic Chinese market | Indicates facility meets national safety standards. |
| Export License (MOFCOM) | Ministry of Commerce | Required for certain controlled goods | Ensures legal export capability. |
Note: Procurement teams must verify certification authenticity via official databases (e.g., CNCA, EU NANDO, FDA Registration Search).
III. Common Quality Defects in Supplier Entity Formation & Operations
The following table outlines common operational and structural defects in Chinese companies that can compromise product quality, delivery, and compliance.
| Common Quality Defect | How to Prevent It |
|---|---|
| Shell Company Structure – No physical facility, staff, or production capability | Conduct on-site audits; verify lease agreements, utility bills, and employee records via HR checks. |
| Mismatched Business Scope – Company not legally permitted to manufacture or export the product | Review business license (营业执照) and confirm alignment with product category and export HS code. |
| Unverified Certification Claims – Fake or expired ISO/FDA/CE certificates | Cross-check certificates with issuing bodies; use third-party verification services (e.g., SGS, TÜV). |
| Subcontracting Without Disclosure – Production outsourced to unapproved facilities | Include audit rights in contracts; require disclosure of subcontractors and conduct facility mapping. |
| Inadequate Quality Management Systems (QMS) – Lack of documented procedures, traceability, or inspection records | Require ISO 9001 certification; audit internal QC processes and non-conformance logs. |
| Labor & Environmental Non-Compliance – Violations of labor law or environmental regulations | Conduct ESG audits; verify social insurance payments and environmental permits (排污许可证). |
| Intellectual Property (IP) Leakage Risk – Weak legal entity with poor IP protection mechanisms | Establish WFOE with clear IP ownership clauses; file patents/trademarks in China via local agents. |
IV. Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- Mandate Legal Entity Verification: Require Business License, Articles of Association, and MOFCOM approval documents during supplier onboarding.
- Include Audit Clauses: Contractually secure rights for unannounced audits of both facilities and administrative offices.
- Engage Local Legal Counsel: Validate company structure, capital status, and compliance with the Foreign Investment Law (2020).
- Leverage Third-Party Verification: Use sourcing agents or auditors to confirm facility existence, production capacity, and certification validity.
- Monitor Regulatory Changes: Track updates from SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation) and MIIT (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
February 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Note: This report does not constitute legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel for entity formation and compliance matters.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Strategy & Labeling Models for China Market Entry (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Establishing manufacturing operations in China (“creating a company in China” via OEM/ODM partnerships) remains a high-potential strategy for global brands, but requires nuanced cost modeling and labeling strategy selection. This report clarifies White Label (WL) vs. Private Label (PL) pathways, provides realistic 2026 cost benchmarks for mid-complexity consumer goods (e.g., electronics accessories, home goods), and highlights critical MOQ-driven cost dynamics. Note: Costs exclude logistics, import duties, and brand-specific compliance (e.g., FCC, CE).
1. Core Manufacturing Models: Strategic Comparison
Critical for procurement strategy alignment
| Factor | White Label (WL) | Private Label (PL) | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product; buyer applies own brand | Custom-designed product for exclusive branding | WL for speed-to-market; PL for differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (often 300-500 units) | Moderate-High (typically 1,000+ units) | WL ideal for testing demand; PL requires volume commitment |
| Tooling/Mold Costs | $0 (uses supplier’s existing tooling) | $2,000–$15,000+ (one-time) | Factor PL mold costs into unit economics |
| Lead Time | 15-30 days | 45-90+ days (design + production) | WL reduces time-to-shelf by 50%+ |
| Quality Control Risk | Higher (limited customization control) | Lower (specifications defined by buyer) | PL reduces long-term risk for brand reputation |
| Cost per Unit (Base) | 10-15% lower than PL at same MOQ | Higher initial cost, better scalability | PL unit cost drops faster at scale (see Table 2) |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients starting with WL transition to PL within 18 months to capture margin upside and reduce dependency on generic designs (2025 Client Survey Data).
2. 2026 Cost Breakdown: Mid-Complexity Consumer Product
Example: Smart Home Sensor (PL Model at 1,000 units MOQ)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost Trend | Procurement Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55-65% | ↑ 3-5% YoY (rare earth metals, polymers) | Secure LTA with material clauses; dual-source critical components |
| Labor | 15-20% | ↑ 2-4% YoY (wage inflation) | Target Tier-2/3 cities (e.g., Wuhan, Chongqing); automate assembly |
| Packaging | 8-12% | ↑ 4-6% YoY (sustainable materials) | Optimize design for flat-packing; MOQ 5,000+ for recycled material discounts |
| Tooling/Molds | 5-10%* | Stable | Amortize over 3+ orders; verify IP ownership in contract |
| QC/Compliance | 7-9% | ↑ 3% YoY (stricter EU/US) | Use 3rd-party inspectors (e.g., SGS); budget for pre-shipment testing |
*Tooling cost is fixed; % decreases significantly at higher volumes (e.g., 2% at 5,000 units).
3. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Private Label Model)
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Data (Mid-Complexity Electronics)
All figures in USD; excludes tooling, logistics, and compliance fees
| MOQ | Unit Cost | Total Cost | Key Cost Drivers at This Tier | Risk Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $9,250 | High mold cost absorption ($8/unit); manual assembly; premium packaging rates | High risk: Margins eroded; 73% of suppliers reject MOQ<500 for PL (2025 data) |
| 1,000 units | $14.20 | $14,200 | Mold cost halved ($4/unit); semi-automated line; standard eco-packaging | Optimal entry: Balance of risk/cost; 89% of new clients start here |
| 5,000 units | $10.75 | $53,750 | Full automation; bulk material discounts; recycled packaging economies | Maximize ROI: 24% lower unit cost vs. 1k MOQ; requires demand certainty |
Critical Notes:
– 500-unit tier: Only viable with WL or PL if mold costs are pre-paid (<$2k). Tooling often non-refundable.
– Volume leverage: Every 2x MOQ increase typically reduces unit cost by 15-22% (2026 Forecast).
– Hidden costs: Add 8-12% for payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit), QC failures, and currency hedging.
4. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start WL, Scale to PL: Validate demand with WL (MOQ 500), then invest in PL tooling at MOQ 1,000. SourcifyChina clients see 31% higher YOY margin growth with this path.
- MOQ Negotiation Levers:
- Offer 50% upfront payment for 20% lower MOQ (e.g., 800 units instead of 1,000).
- Bundle SKUs (e.g., 2 color variants) to meet MOQ without inventory risk.
- Cost Control Imperatives:
- Avoid “all-inclusive” quotes – demand line-item cost breakdowns.
- Audit labor costs: Verify if quoted labor includes social insurance (mandatory in China; often omitted).
- Lock material clauses: Index pricing to Shanghai Metal Exchange for >6-month contracts.
- Compliance Non-Negotiables: Budget $0.50-$1.20/unit for pre-shipment testing (e.g., EMC, safety). Skipping this risks customs seizures (2025 EU RAPEX data: 37% of China-made electronics failed).
Conclusion
China manufacturing remains cost-competitive for global brands, but success hinges on strategic labeling model selection and volume-aware cost modeling. Prioritize Private Label for long-term margin control, but leverage White Label for market validation. At MOQs below 1,000 units, WL is economically imperative; at 1,000+ units, PL delivers superior ROI with disciplined supplier management. Procurement teams that factor in hidden costs (tooling, compliance, payment terms) achieve 22% higher project success rates (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Free MOQ Cost Simulator (customized for your product category) to model real-time 2026 pricing. [Contact Sourcing Team]
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence | Data Validated Q4 2025 | © 2026
Disclaimer: Estimates based on aggregated 2025 supplier data; actual costs vary by product complexity, region, and contract terms.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers – Factory vs. Trading Company Identification & Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to shift toward greater transparency and resilience, verifying the legitimacy and capability of Chinese manufacturing partners remains a top priority for procurement professionals. With increasing complexity in the supplier landscape—especially amid rising demand for “create a company in China” services—distinguishing between genuine factories and trading companies is essential to mitigate risk, ensure cost efficiency, and maintain supply chain control.
This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to authenticate manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and identify red flags that could jeopardize procurement integrity.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License (营业执照) | Verify legal registration with the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR). Cross-check business scope for manufacturing activities. |
| 2 | Obtain Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) | Use the USCC to validate company status via official platforms like National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. |
| 3 | Conduct On-Site Audit (or Third-Party Inspection) | Physically verify production lines, equipment, workforce, and inventory. Confirm factory size and operational capacity. |
| 4 | Review Export License & Customs Records | Confirm direct export rights (if claimed). Request recent Bills of Lading or export declarations as proof of shipment history. |
| 5 | Audit Production Capacity & MOQ Compliance | Validate lead times, production volume, and Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) against actual floor operations. |
| 6 | Request Certifications & Compliance Documents | Verify ISO, CCC, RoHS, or industry-specific certifications. Ensure documents are current and issued by accredited bodies. |
| 7 | Check References & Client Portfolio | Contact existing clients (especially Western brands) for feedback on quality, delivery, and communication. |
| 8 | Perform Bank & Credit Verification | Use services like Dun & Bradstreet or local credit reports to assess financial stability. |
Pro Tip: For companies assisting in “create a company in China” services, ensure the entity is registered under manufacturing (e.g., 生产, 制造) rather than trading (贸易).
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes terms like “production,” “manufacture,” “processing” (生产, 制造, 加工) | Typically includes “sales,” “trading,” “import/export” (贸易, 销售) |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases manufacturing premises with machinery and assembly lines | No production equipment; may operate from office parks or commercial buildings |
| Workforce | Employs engineers, machine operators, QC staff | Staff consists of sales, logistics, and sourcing personnel |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Higher margins; may lack granular cost breakdown |
| Production Control | Can provide real-time updates on production status, mold ownership, process flow | Limited visibility into production; relies on third-party factories |
| Export Documentation | Listed as manufacturer on Bill of Lading, Certificate of Origin | Often listed as “seller” or “exporter” but not manufacturer |
| Factory Audit Results | Full production lines, raw material storage, QC labs | Minimal physical footprint; no machinery or inventory |
| Website & Marketing | Showcases machinery, workshops, R&D capabilities | Highlights supplier network, global reach, sourcing expertise |
Note: Some entities operate as hybrid models (trading company with affiliated factories). Always confirm direct control and ownership.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video or on-site audit | High likelihood of misrepresentation | Postpone engagement until audit is completed |
| No verifiable factory address or Google Street View access | Possible shell company or virtual office | Use local verification services or third-party inspectors |
| Inconsistent or forged certifications | Non-compliance risk; potential legal liability | Validate certificates via issuing bodies (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
| Pricing significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or middlemen markup | Request detailed cost breakdown and sample testing |
| Poor English communication or evasive responses | Risk of miscommunication and quality issues | Require a dedicated English-speaking project manager |
| No direct export license (for claimed manufacturer) | Reliance on third parties; longer supply chain | Confirm export rights via customs records or ask for export docs |
| Refusal to sign NDA or formal contract | IP theft or breach risk | Use standardized procurement contracts with legal review |
| Pressure for full upfront payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
4. Best Practices for Procurement Managers
- Use Third-Party Verification Services: Engage firms like SGS, Bureau Veritas, or QIMA for factory audits.
- Leverage E-Commerce Platforms Wisely: On Alibaba, filter for “Verified” and “Assessed Supplier” tags, but do not rely solely on platform badges.
- Visit China in Person or via Representative: Face-to-face due diligence remains the gold standard.
- Establish Long-Term Contracts with SLAs: Define quality standards, delivery timelines, and penalties for non-compliance.
- Monitor Supplier Performance Quarterly: Track on-time delivery, defect rates, and communication responsiveness.
Conclusion
In the evolving landscape of Chinese manufacturing, procurement managers must adopt a proactive, evidence-based approach to supplier verification. By systematically validating manufacturer legitimacy, distinguishing true factories from intermediaries, and recognizing red flags early, organizations can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains.
Creating a company in China offers strategic advantages—but only when backed by transparent, vetted manufacturing partnerships.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Accelerated Market Entry Report
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026
Executive Summary: Eliminate 70% of Market Entry Delays
Global procurement teams lose 14.2 weeks annually navigating China’s complex business registration landscape (SourcifyChina 2025 Procurement Pain Point Survey). Unverified service providers cause 68% of WFOE (Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprise) setup failures due to licensing gaps, regulatory misalignment, and hidden compliance risks. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List—curated through 22-point vendor validation—is the only solution guaranteeing 90-day market entry with zero rework.
Why Procurement Managers Choose Our Verified Pro List
| DIY Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time/Cost Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 8–12 weeks vetting providers | Pre-vetted partners (3 days onboarding) | –87% vendor screening time |
| 42% risk of registration rejection | 100% success rate in 2025 filings | –$28K avg. rework cost |
| Manual compliance tracking | Real-time regulatory updates via SourcifyHub™ | –15 FTE hours/week |
| Unpredictable timelines | SLA-backed 90-day WFOE completion | Q3 launch certainty |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Market Entry Benchmark (n=127 multinational clients)
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Built for Procurement Rigor
- Zero-Risk Verification: Every provider undergoes on-site audits, license authenticity checks, and 3-year performance tracking.
- Procurement-Grade SLAs: Guaranteed timelines, transparent pricing, and penalty clauses for delays.
- End-to-End Ownership: Single-point accountability from business license acquisition to tax registration—no handoffs.
- Compliance Shield: Automated updates on 2026 NEEQ (New Third Board) reforms and cross-border data rules.
“SourcifyChina cut our China entity setup from 5 months to 11 weeks. Their Pro List turned a procurement headache into a boardroom win.”
— CPO, Fortune 500 Industrial Equipment Firm
🚀 Your Call to Action: Secure Q4 2026 Market Entry
Procurement leaders who act before September 30, 2026, lock in:
✅ Priority access to our top 3 WFOE specialists (only 5 slots open)
✅ Free compliance audit ($4,500 value) for 2026 regulatory alignment
✅ Dedicated procurement liaison for ERP integration support
Time is your highest-cost resource. Every week delayed costs $182K in missed revenue (per Gartner 2026 China Entry Model).
👉 Contact us within 48 hours for expedited onboarding:
– Email: [email protected]
Subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company] Q4 ENTRY”
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Message template: “Verify Pro List access for [Company Name] – Target WFOE completion by [Date]”
Do not risk Q4 delays with unvetted providers. Our team responds within 2 business hours to procurement inquiries.
SourcifyChina is the only ISO 20400-certified sourcing partner for China market entry. All Pro List providers comply with MOFCOM 2026 Foreign Investment Guidelines.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | Transforming Procurement, One Verified Partner at a Time
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
