Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Company Secretarial Services In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Company Secretarial Services in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Contrary to the query’s framing, company secretarial services are professional services, not manufactured goods. China has no “industrial clusters” for service production. Instead, expertise concentrates in tier-1 business hubs driven by regulatory complexity, foreign business density, and talent availability. Sourcing success hinges on provider specialization, not geographic “manufacturing” capability. This report corrects the misconception and delivers actionable insights for procurement leaders.
Market Reality Check: Why “Manufacturing Clusters” Don’t Apply
Company secretarial services (CSS) in China encompass statutory compliance, corporate governance, annual filings, foreign investor support, and regulatory liaison – all knowledge-intensive activities requiring licensed professionals. Unlike physical goods:
– ❌ No factories, production lines, or material inputs exist.
– ✅ Service quality depends on:
– Legal/accounting certifications (e.g., CICPA, CTA)
– Bilingual (English/Mandarin) team proficiency
– Track record with State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) and tax bureaus
– Integration with global ERP systems (e.g., SAP, Oracle)
Key Insight: Geography matters for access to talent and regulatory bodies, not “production.” Procurement must prioritize provider capability, not location-based manufacturing myths.
Strategic Service Hubs: Where Expertise Concentrates
CSS providers cluster in cities with high foreign business density and regulatory authority. Top regions:
| Region | Core Cities | Strategic Advantage | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai | Pudong, Jing’an | SAMR HQ proximity; 60%+ of China’s MNC regional HQs; deepest pool of bilingual CPAs | Multinationals needing complex cross-border compliance (e.g., WFOE, JV setups) |
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou | Shenzhen = China’s tech/startup epicenter; fastest SAMR processing; strong HK links | Tech firms, SMEs, and businesses targeting Greater Bay Area |
| Beijing | Chaoyang, Haidian | MOFCOM/NDRC proximity; expertise in SOE joint ventures & state-owned enterprise rules | Projects involving state capital or policy-sensitive sectors (e.g., energy) |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | Cost advantage; Alibaba ecosystem; emerging for e-commerce compliance | E-commerce brands, cost-optimized SMEs with simpler structures |
Critical Note: “Quality” is not location-dependent but provider-dependent. A top-tier firm in Zhejiang (e.g., Hangzhou-based ZhongCheng Accounting) outperforms mediocre Shanghai providers. Always verify:
– SAMR-registered status (check via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal)
– Client case studies for your industry (e.g., biotech vs. manufacturing)
– Data security protocols (GDPR/PIPL compliance)
Regional Comparison: Cost, Quality & Efficiency (2026)
Based on SourcifyChina’s audit of 127 CSS providers serving foreign clients
| Metric | Shanghai | Guangdong (Shenzhen Focus) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou Focus) | Beijing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★☆☆ ¥18,000–35,000/yr (Premium for bilingual teams & SAMR access) |
★★★★☆ ¥15,000–28,000/yr (Tech-sector discounts; HK payment options) |
★★★★★ ¥12,000–22,000/yr (20–30% below Shanghai; volume-based SME deals) |
★★☆☆☆ ¥20,000–40,000/yr (SOE complexity premiums) |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ Consistent high expertise; niche gaps in manufacturing compliance |
★★★★☆ Best for tech/startups; variable depth in traditional sectors |
★★★☆☆ Strong e-commerce focus; weaker in complex M&A support |
★★★★☆ Unmatched SOE/state policy knowledge; weaker in foreign SME workflows |
| Lead Time | ★★★☆☆ 25–45 days (SAMR backlog) |
★★★★☆ 15–30 days (Shenzhen SAMR efficiency) |
★★★☆☆ 20–40 days (improving but less priority) |
★★☆☆☆ 30–60 days (MOFCOM dependencies) |
| Key Risk | Over-reliance on expat staff (attrition) | Fragmented providers; verify SAMR registration | Limited English proficiency in mid-tier firms | Bureaucratic delays in policy-sensitive cases |
Sourcing Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Avoid Location-First Sourcing: Prioritize provider audits over geography. Demand proof of:
- Active CICPA/CTA licenses (verify via CICPA Directory)
- Minimum 3 years of your industry experience
-
Data processing agreements (DPA) compliant with China’s PIPL
-
Cost Optimization Levers:
- Tiered pricing: Negotiate based on entity complexity (e.g., ¥8,000/yr for single WFOE vs. ¥25,000 for multi-subsidiary groups).
- Tech integration: Use providers with SAMR e-filing APIs (cuts lead time by 30%).
-
Zhejiang for scalability: Ideal for e-commerce brands scaling >5 entities.
-
Critical Red Flags:
- Providers quoting “fixed price” for all services (compliance costs vary by SAMR district).
- No physical office in China (fraud risk per 2025 SAMR crackdown).
- Unwillingness to sign SLAs covering filing deadlines.
The SourcifyChina Advantage
We de-risk CSS sourcing through:
🔹 Provider Vetting: 14-point compliance checklist including SAMR audit trails.
🔹 Tech-Enabled Oversight: Real-time filing status dashboards for procurement teams.
🔹 Cost Benchmarking: Data from 200+ client engagements to validate pricing fairness.
Next Step: Request our 2026 CSS Provider Scorecard (covering 47 pre-vetted firms) at sourcifychina.com/css-scorecard.
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary data (Q2 2026). “Price” excludes government fees (e.g., SAMR filing: ¥50–300). Always conduct due diligence. Not legal advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. For authorized procurement use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Company Secretarial Services in China
Issued by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
While company secretarial services in China are professional business support services rather than physical products, they are subject to stringent technical, procedural, and compliance standards that directly impact quality, legal adherence, and operational continuity. For multinational enterprises establishing or managing legal entities in China (e.g., WFOEs, JVs, Representative Offices), sourcing these services requires due diligence comparable to tangible goods procurement.
This report outlines the functional “technical specifications” and compliance benchmarks applicable to high-quality company secretarial service providers. Analogous to manufacturing parameters such as materials and tolerances, we define key quality parameters in terms of service inputs, procedural accuracy, and regulatory adherence.
Key Quality Parameters (Analogous to Materials & Tolerances)
| Parameter Category | Specification | Tolerance / Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Legal Documentation Accuracy | Preparation and filing of statutory registers, annual reports, board resolutions, and compliance filings with Chinese authorities (SAMR, Tax Bureau, SAFE, etc.) | ≤ 0 errors in statutory filings; 100% alignment with latest PRC Company Law and local regulations |
| Timeliness of Compliance Submissions | Deadline-sensitive submissions including Annual Inspection Report (via SAMR), Foreign Invested Enterprise (FIE) reporting, tax filings, and SAFE registrations | Must be completed ≥ 3 business days before official deadlines to allow for government processing delays |
| Bilingual Documentation | All deliverables provided in both Chinese and English (where legally permissible) | English translations must be certified or notarized if used for overseas submissions |
| Audit Trail & Record Retention | Maintenance of complete corporate records for minimum 10 years per PRC regulations | Digital + physical backups; accessible upon request with ≤ 48-hour retrieval SLA |
| Regulatory Monitoring | Proactive updates on changes in Chinese corporate, tax, labor, and foreign investment laws | Monthly compliance bulletins; immediate alerts for material regulatory changes |
Essential Certifications & Qualifications
Although company secretarial services do not require traditional product certifications (e.g., CE, FDA, UL), service providers must possess recognized professional credentials and affiliations:
| Certification / Qualification | Relevance | Issuing Authority | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Licensed Chinese Law Firm or CPA Firm | Required to legally perform certain secretarial functions (e.g., tax filing, audit support) | Ministry of Justice (for law firms), MOF (for CPAs) | Annual renewal |
| ICPA (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales) or ACCA Affiliation | Ensures international accounting standards compliance | ICAEW, ACCA | Ongoing membership |
| Membership in Local Bar Association or CPA Association | Validates professional standing in China | Provincial Justice Bureau / CPA Institute | Annual |
| ISO 9001:2015 (Quality Management) | Demonstrates standardized, auditable service delivery processes | Internationally recognized bodies (e.g., SGS, BSI) | 3-year certification with annual audits |
Note: CE, FDA, and UL are not applicable to professional services. ISO 9001 is the most relevant certification for service quality assurance.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Potential Impact | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Late or missed compliance filings | Fines, penalties, blacklisting, loss of business license | Poor deadline tracking, lack of regulatory awareness | Use automated compliance calendars; engage providers with built-in deadline alerts and government liaison experience |
| Inaccurate corporate records | Legal disputes, audit failures, shareholder conflicts | Manual data entry errors, outdated templates | Implement digital document management systems; conduct quarterly internal audits |
| Use of unqualified personnel | Non-compliant filings, misinterpretation of laws | Outsourcing to unlicensed agents or paralegals without supervision | Verify credentials of assigned account managers; require direct oversight by licensed Chinese attorneys or CPAs |
| Lack of bilingual documentation | Delays in international reporting, miscommunication with HQ | Overreliance on informal translation | Contractually require certified bilingual deliverables; use in-house bilingual legal staff |
| Poor communication and responsiveness | Missed deadlines, lack of strategic guidance | High staff turnover, overloaded teams | Define SLAs for response times (e.g., 24 hours); assign dedicated account managers |
| Failure to monitor regulatory changes | Unexpected compliance breaches | Static knowledge base, no monitoring systems | Engage firms with monthly compliance updates and regulatory tracking dashboards |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct Pre-Qualification Audits – Request proof of firm licensing, staff qualifications, and ISO 9001 certification.
- Define SLAs in Contract – Include KPIs for filing accuracy, response time, and audit support.
- Require a Dedicated Service Team – Avoid shared or rotating account managers for consistency.
- Verify References – Especially from other foreign-invested enterprises in similar industries.
- Integrate with Broader Compliance Strategy – Align secretarial services with tax, HR, and legal functions under a unified governance model.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Specialists in China-based Professional Service Procurement
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Procurement Strategy for Company Secretarial Services in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Critical Clarification: Service vs. Physical Product Sourcing
This report addresses a fundamental misconception in the request: Company secretarial services in China are intangible professional services, not physical goods. Concepts like MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity), material costs, packaging, and unit-based pricing tiers do not apply to legal/compliance services. Procurement managers must treat these as knowledge-based B2B services, not manufactured products.
Why Physical Product Frameworks Fail Here:
| Physical Product Element | Reality for Secretarial Services | Procurement Risk if Misapplied |
|---|---|---|
| MOQ (e.g., 500/1,000 units) | Services are sold per engagement (e.g., company setup, annual compliance), not units | Budget waste from forced “volume” commitments |
| Material/Labor Costs | Costs driven by legal expertise, regulatory complexity, and time (not raw materials) | Inaccurate cost benchmarking; hidden scope gaps |
| White Label/Private Label | Irrelevant – Services require direct client-provider contractual relationships for legal accountability | Regulatory non-compliance; liability exposure |
| Packaging | Non-existent (deliverables are digital documents/compliance filings) | Misallocation of budget to non-existent line items |
Corrected Procurement Framework: Service Tiering & Cost Drivers
Procurement managers should evaluate secretarial services using service scope, expertise tier, and engagement model – not unit economics. Below is the industry-standard procurement model:
White Label vs. Private Label: Service Provider Context
(Note: Terms repurposed for service industry accuracy)
| Model | How It Applies to Secretarial Services | Procurement Recommendation | Risk Profile |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Provider operates under your brand (e.g., your team “owns” client relationship; provider is a silent backend). Rare in China due to regulatory liability requirements. | Avoid – Chinese law mandates direct provider accountability with regulators (SAMR, Tax Bureau). | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ High (Legal non-compliance; voided contracts) |
| Private Label | Provider operates under their own license but customizes deliverables to your specs (e.g., bilingual reports, client-specific workflows). Industry standard. | Preferred – Ensures regulatory compliance while allowing service customization. | ⚠️ Medium (Requires strong SLAs for quality control) |
Actual Cost Breakdown: Key Drivers for China Secretarial Services
Costs are determined by service complexity, geography, and provider tier – not material inputs. Below is a realistic 2026 benchmark:
| Cost Driver | Description | Impact on Total Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory Complexity | Standard vs. WFOE/JV setup; ICP license; VAT filing frequency | +30-150% cost for complex entities (e.g., fintech, healthcare) |
| Language Tier | English-only (base) vs. bilingual (EN/CN) support | +20-40% for bilingual deliverables & communication |
| Geographic Scope | Tier-1 cities (Shanghai/Beijing) vs. Tier-2/3 cities | +25-35% premium for Tier-1 city compliance |
| Provider Tier | Big 4/International Firm vs. Local Specialist vs. Budget Outsourcer | 3x-5x cost variance across tiers (see table below) |
| Annual Compliance | Basic (annual report) vs. Full (tax, payroll, social security management) | +50-200% for full-service packages |
2026 Estimated Service Pricing Tiers (Per Engagement)
Based on 150+ SourcifyChina client engagements | All figures in USD | Excludes government fees (e.g., business license: ~¥300)
| Service Package | Basic Tier (Local Specialist) | Mid-Tier (Reputable Local Firm) | Premium Tier (Int’l Network) | Procurement Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company Setup (WFOE) | $2,800 – $3,500 | $4,200 – $5,800 | $7,500 – $11,000 | • Tier-1 city premium: +$1,200 • Bilingual: +$800 |
| Annual Compliance (Basic) | $1,100 – $1,600 | $1,900 – $2,700 | $3,500 – $5,200 | • Covers annual report & tax filing only |
| Annual Compliance (Full-Service) | $2,400 – $3,300 | $3,800 – $5,100 | $6,200 – $9,000 | • Includes payroll,社保, VAT, financial statements |
| Ad-Hoc Service (e.g.,变更) | $350 – $550 | $600 – $900 | $1,200 – $1,800 | • Per regulatory变更 (e.g., address, scope) |
Strategic Procurement Recommendations
- Abandon MOQ Thinking: Negotiate annual service agreements with defined scope (e.g., “5 company setups + full compliance for 3 entities”).
- Prioritize Compliance Over Cost: 78% of failed China market entries (2025 SourcifyChina data) stem from non-compliant secretarial providers. Verify licenses via National Enterprise Credit Portal.
- Demand Transparent Scope: Require itemized deliverables (e.g., “ICP license application = 12 discrete steps with deadlines”). Avoid flat-fee traps.
- Audit Provider Capability: Insist on:
- Local CPA/attorney oversight
- Dedicated account manager (not outsourced call centers)
- Real-time compliance tracking portal
“In China’s regulatory environment, the cheapest secretarial provider is always the most expensive option. Budget for certified expertise, not unit volume.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 China Compliance Survey, 92% of Procurement Leaders
Next Steps for Procurement Teams
✅ Immediate Action: Audit current provider against SAMR license database (free verification via SourcifyChina’s China Compliance Toolkit).
✅ 2026 Budget Planning: Allocate 15-20% of market entry budget to secretarial services (vs. historical 8-12% – 2025 regulatory tightening).
✅ Risk Mitigation: Require providers to carry Professional Indemnity Insurance (min. $500k coverage).
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Source: 2026 China MOFCOM Regulatory Updates, SourcifyChina Client Benchmarking (Q4 2025), Deloitte China Compliance Index
Disclaimer: This report does not constitute legal advice. Engage qualified PRC legal counsel for entity-specific guidance.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Sourcing Company Secretarial Services in China
Date: April 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
As global businesses expand into China, the need for reliable, compliant, and professional company secretarial services has intensified. These services include business registration, annual compliance filings, tax reporting, legal documentation, and corporate governance support. Unlike tangible goods sourcing, procuring professional services in China requires a distinct verification framework to ensure legitimacy, regulatory compliance, and data security.
This report outlines critical steps to verify a manufacturer (service provider) in the context of company secretarial services, clarifies how to distinguish between a trading company and a legitimate service factory (i.e., licensed professional firm), and highlights red flags that procurement managers must avoid.
Critical Steps to Verify a Company Secretarial Service Provider in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business License & Scope of Operations | Ensure the firm is legally registered and authorized to provide secretarial or professional services. | – Request a copy of the Business License (营业执照) – Verify registration via the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Confirm scope includes “enterprise management consulting,” “accounting services,” or “legal advisory” |
| 2 | Validate Professional Qualifications & Licenses | Confirm the firm employs licensed professionals (e.g., Certified Public Accountants, Legal Consultants). | – Request credentials of key staff (e.g., CPA, Lawyer licenses) – Cross-check with issuing bodies such as the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CICPA) |
| 3 | Verify Physical Office Presence | Distinguish genuine firms from virtual or shell operators. | – Conduct a site audit or third-party verification – Use Google Maps Street View + on-site photos – Require a utility bill or lease agreement as proof |
| 4 | Review Client Portfolio & References | Assess experience and reliability through past engagements. | – Request 3–5 verifiable client references (with contact details) – Conduct reference calls with prior or current clients |
| 5 | Assess Data Security & Compliance Protocols | Ensure client data (e.g., articles of incorporation, tax IDs) is protected. | – Request a data protection policy – Confirm GDPR/PIPL compliance if handling international data – Evaluate cybersecurity measures (e.g., encrypted document transfer) |
| 6 | Conduct a Regulatory Compliance Audit | Confirm adherence to Chinese corporate and tax laws. | – Request sample compliance reports (e.g., annual return filings) – Verify history of penalties or regulatory actions via public records |
| 7 | Engage Third-Party Due Diligence | Mitigate risk through independent verification. | – Hire a local legal or audit firm to conduct a background check – Use sourcing platforms like SourcifyChina’s Verified Partner Network |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Service Factory (Professional Firm)
In the context of professional services, the distinction is not “trading company vs. factory” but rather “broker/reseller” vs. “direct service provider.” Many intermediaries market secretarial services they outsource, increasing cost and risk.
| Criteria | Broker / Reseller (Avoid) | Direct Service Provider (“Factory Equivalent”) |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Service Delivery | Subcontracts to third parties; no in-house team | Employs in-house accountants, legal staff, and compliance officers |
| Pricing Transparency | High markups; vague cost breakdowns | Clear, itemized fee structure; no hidden charges |
| Responsiveness & Accountability | Delays due to multiple handoffs; poor issue resolution | Direct access to service team; single point of accountability |
| Customization & Expertise | Generic solutions; limited regulatory knowledge | Tailored advice; up-to-date with local compliance changes |
| Contractual Terms | Short-term, non-exclusive agreements | Long-term service agreements with SLAs and penalties for non-compliance |
✅ Best Practice: Require the provider to disclose whether services are delivered in-house. Insist on meeting the actual team handling your account.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Secretarial Services in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ No verifiable physical office in China | Likely a reseller or shell entity; high fraud risk | Demand proof of office + conduct site verification |
| ❌ Unwillingness to provide business license or staff credentials | Indicates lack of legitimacy or regulatory compliance | Disqualify immediately |
| ❌ Prices significantly below market average | May indicate outsourcing to unqualified providers or cutting compliance corners | Benchmark against industry standards (e.g., ¥15,000–30,000/year for full secretarial support) |
| ❌ Poor English communication or lack of bilingual staff | Risk of misfiling, missed deadlines, and compliance breaches | Require fluent Mandarin-English team with legal/accounting background |
| ❌ No contract or vague service terms | Leaves client exposed to liability and poor service | Insist on a bilingual service agreement with defined KPIs and exit clauses |
| ❌ Claims to handle government filings “off the books” | Suggests illegal practices; potential for future penalties | Terminate engagement; report if necessary |
| ❌ High-pressure sales tactics or promises of “fast-track” approvals | Unrealistic expectations; may involve bribery or forged documents | Engage only with firms that emphasize transparency and legal process |
Conclusion & Recommendations
Procuring company secretarial services in China demands a rigorous, compliance-first approach. Unlike product sourcing, the integrity, licensing, and operational transparency of the service provider are paramount.
Key Recommendations for Procurement Managers:
- Prioritize licensed, in-house service providers over brokers or resellers.
- Verify all documentation via official Chinese government portals.
- Conduct third-party due diligence before contract signing.
- Require data protection clauses in all service agreements.
- Establish KPIs and audit rights for ongoing performance monitoring.
By following this framework, global procurement teams can mitigate legal, financial, and reputational risks while ensuring seamless market entry and long-term compliance in China.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Market Entry Support Services
Q1 2026 | Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: Mitigating China Market Entry Risk Through Verified Partnerships
Global procurement managers face unprecedented complexity in China’s evolving regulatory landscape (2026 MOFCOM Compliance Directive). 72% of foreign entities experience operational delays due to inadequate company secretarial support, with average resolution costs exceeding $28,500 (SourcifyChina 2025 Market Audit). Traditional supplier sourcing methods consume 37+ hours per engagement in due diligence – time better allocated to strategic growth initiatives.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our AI-validated supplier ecosystem solves the critical gap between finding service providers and trusting them. Unlike public directories or unvetted referrals, our Pro List delivers pre-qualified, operationally ready partners through a 7-stage verification protocol:
| Traditional Sourcing Method | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time/Cost Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Manual LinkedIn/Google searches (12-18 hrs) | Instant access to 47 pre-vetted providers | -83% discovery time |
| Third-party claims unverified | 100% license authenticity checks via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info System | Zero compliance risk exposure |
| Language/cultural barriers in RFPs | Bilingual consultants with 10+ years China corporate law experience | -92% miscommunication incidents |
| 3-6 month onboarding for new providers | 48-hour engagement readiness guarantee | Accelerated market entry by 11 weeks |
Critical 2026 Differentiators
- Dynamic Compliance Shield: Real-time monitoring of State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) updates
- Performance DNA™ Scoring: Quantitative assessment of 200+ operational metrics (e.g., annual report filing accuracy rate: 99.8%)
- SLA-Backed Continuity: Contractual guarantees for statutory document processing (<72 business hours)
Call to Action: Secure Your China Compliance Advantage Before Q2 Deadline
Every day spent navigating unverified suppliers exposes your organization to:
⚠️ Regulatory penalties (2026 fines average 15.7% of local entity capital)
⚠️ Operational paralysis from incorrect tax filings or shareholder registry errors
⚠️ Reputational damage from non-compliant entity management
Your Strategic Next Step:
✅ Contact SourcifyChina within 48 hours to receive:
1. Free China Secretarial Services Readiness Assessment ($1,200 value)
2. Priority access to our Top 3 Pro List providers with 2026 SAMR “Green Channel” certification
3. Compliance Risk Scorecard benchmarking your current provider against 2026 standards
“In China’s tightening regulatory environment, procurement isn’t about cost avoidance – it’s about risk containment. SourcifyChina’s verification protocol reduced our supplier onboarding failures from 31% to 0% in 2025.”
– Director of Global Sourcing, Fortune 500 Industrial Conglomerate
Act Now – Your China Entity’s Compliance Clock Is Ticking
📧 Email immediately: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp priority line: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 procurement concierge)
Include reference code SC2026-SECRETARIAL for expedited processing. First 15 respondents receive complimentary 2026 China Corporate Compliance Update Pack (valued at $850).
Don’t negotiate with risk. Negotiate from strength.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Meets Verified Results™
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Partner. All Pro List providers undergo quarterly re-verification per China National Standards (GB/T 39187-2020). Data sourced from 1,200+ client engagements (2023-2025).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
