Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Clothing Company China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Sourcing Apparel from China: Market Analysis & Regional Clusters
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers by SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant hub for apparel manufacturing, offering unparalleled scale, supply chain integration, and specialization across regional clusters. Despite rising competition from Southeast Asia, China maintains a strategic advantage in high-volume, precision, and fast-turnaround garment production. This report provides a data-driven analysis of key industrial clusters for sourcing apparel from China, focusing on regional strengths in price, quality, and lead time. Strategic insights are provided to support procurement decisions in 2026 and beyond.
Overview: China’s Apparel Manufacturing Landscape
China accounts for approximately 32% of global apparel exports (ITC, 2025), with over 140,000 garment manufacturers operating nationwide. The industry is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters specializing in different product categories—ranging from fast fashion and sportswear to premium casual and technical outerwear.
Key drivers for sourcing apparel from China in 2026:
– Mature supply chain ecosystems (fabric, trims, dyeing, logistics)
– Advanced automation and digital production lines
– Strong compliance infrastructure (BSCI, SEDEX, WRAP)
– Proximity to raw material hubs and ports
Key Industrial Clusters for Apparel Manufacturing in China
Below are the leading provinces and cities recognized for their concentration of clothing company china operations:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Export Volume (2025 est.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan | Fast fashion, sportswear, casualwear, children’s clothing | $38.2B |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Shaoxing, Huzhou | Mid-to-high-end fashion, knits, denim, outerwear | $32.7B |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nantong | Premium casualwear, woolens, tailored garments | $25.4B |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Xiamen, Quanzhou | Sportswear, activewear, OEM for global sport brands | $18.9B |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai, Weifang | Cotton basics, workwear, knitwear | $14.3B |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates the top apparel manufacturing provinces based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Average Lead Time.
| Region | Price (1–5 Scale) (1 = Highest, 5 = Most Competitive) |
Quality (1–5 Scale) (1 = Low, 5 = Premium) |
Lead Time (Days) (MOQ 5K–50K pcs) |
Key Advantages | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4.5 | 4.0 | 30–45 | Strong logistics; OEM/ODM expertise; proximity to Hong Kong | Fast fashion, high-volume runs, time-sensitive orders |
| Zhejiang | 4.8 | 4.7 | 35–50 | High automation; design integration; fabric verticals | Mid-to-premium fashion, branded collections, sustainable lines |
| Jiangsu | 4.0 | 4.8 | 40–55 | Skilled labor; focus on precision tailoring | Woolens, tailored jackets, premium cotton shirts |
| Fujian | 4.6 | 4.3 | 32–48 | Specialized in performance fabrics; strong sportswear OEM | Activewear, technical sportswear, branded athletic lines |
| Shandong | 5.0 | 3.8 | 28–40 | Lowest labor costs; efficient for bulk basics | Commodity items (tees, polo shirts, workwear) |
Note:
– Price scale: 5 = most cost-competitive; 1 = premium pricing
– Quality scale: 5 = international brand standards (e.g., ZARA, Uniqlo, Nike); 1 = basic domestic quality
– Lead time includes sampling (7–14 days), bulk production, and pre-shipment QC
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
For Speed-to-Market:
Prioritize Guangdong—especially Guangzhou and Foshan—for agile manufacturing with air freight access via Baiyun Airport and port connectivity through Nansha. -
For Quality & Innovation:
Leverage Zhejiang’s ecosystem in Hangzhou and Shaoxing for digitally enabled factories, sustainable dyeing (e.g., near-zero water discharge), and integrated design-to-delivery workflows. -
For Cost-Sensitive Bulk Orders:
Shandong offers the lowest landed cost for basic cotton garments, with strong production capacity and reliable compliance frameworks. -
For Technical & Performance Wear:
Fujian is home to Tier 1 suppliers for global sportswear brands (e.g., Anta, Li-Ning, and subcontractors for Nike/Adidas), with expertise in moisture-wicking, compression, and UV-protective fabrics. -
For Premium & Tailored Garments:
Jiangsu excels in fine cotton, wool blends, and structured garments, with factories experienced in European brand specifications.
Emerging Trends in 2026
- Smart Factories: Over 40% of Tier 2+ suppliers in Zhejiang and Guangdong now use ERP and MES systems for real-time order tracking.
- Sustainability Push: Zhejiang leads in OEKO-TEX and GOTS-certified production; Shaoxing is a hub for recycled polyester and low-impact dyeing.
- Nearshoring Pressure: While costs are rising (~5–7% YoY), China’s reliability and scale still outweigh risks for high-compliance buyers.
- Dual Sourcing Strategy: Leading brands are pairing China (for quality and speed) with Vietnam or Bangladesh (for cost) to de-risk.
Conclusion
China remains the most strategic sourcing destination for apparel in 2026, particularly for buyers requiring quality consistency, speed, and scalability. Regional specialization allows procurement managers to align supplier selection with product type, margin targets, and time-to-market goals. A cluster-specific sourcing strategy—backed by local partner verification and compliance audits—will maximize ROI and supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Data Sources: China National Textile & Apparel Council (CNTAC), ITC Trade Map, SourcifyChina Supplier Intelligence Platform (2025)
Report Validity: Q1 2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Apparel Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for apparel manufacturing, supplying 31% of the world’s clothing (WTO 2025). However, 2026 procurement demands enhanced technical precision, stricter sustainability compliance, and proactive defect mitigation due to evolving EU/US regulations (e.g., EU Strategy for Sustainable Textiles, Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act). This report details critical specifications and compliance protocols for apparel manufacturers in China, not a specific entity named “clothing company china.”
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
All measurements align with ISO 20685-2:2020 (3D scanning for garment fit) and AATCC/ASTM standards.
| Parameter | Critical Specifications | Tolerance Thresholds | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Fiber composition (e.g., 100% organic cotton, GRS-certified polyester) • Fabric weight (gsm): e.g., 180-220gsm for mid-weight knits • Colorfastness (AATCC 61/107): ≥4 for light/rubbing • Pilling resistance (ISO 12945): ≥3.5 grade |
±3% fiber composition variance ±5gsm weight deviation ≤0.5 grade color variation |
Lab test (SGS/Intertek) Batch sampling |
| Construction | • Seam strength (ASTM D1683): ≥15 lbf for woven tops • Stitch density: 8-12 SPI (woven), 14-18 CPI (knit) • Seam puckering: ≤Grade 3 (ISO 7437) • Label placement accuracy: ±0.5cm |
±1 SPI/CPI ±0.3cm measurement deviation ±2% shrinkage (after 3 washes) |
In-line QC audit Pre-shipment inspection |
| Finishing | • Iron-on label adhesion: 90°C/20min no peel • Zipper operation force: ≤15N (ISO 10283) • Embroidery thread coverage: ≥95% |
±2N zipper force deviation ≤2mm misalignment on prints |
Functional testing Visual inspection |
2026 Trend Note: Digital product passports (EU Ecodesign Directive) will require blockchain-tracked material origins by 2027. Pre-qualify suppliers with ERP systems supporting traceability (e.g., Centric PLM).
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-apparel certifications (CE, FDA, UL) are generally irrelevant for standard apparel. Focus on textile-specific frameworks:
| Certification | Applicability | 2026 Critical Updates | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Mandatory for EU/NA brands Covers chemical safety, workplace conditions, environmental management |
Scope expanded to include microplastic shedding (2026) and forced labor risk mapping | Audit report must reference Module 6 (Social Compliance) |
| ISO 9001 | Baseline for quality systems Required by 92% of Tier-1 global brands |
2025 revision emphasizes AI-driven defect prediction & circular economy integration | Confirm certification body (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) |
| GRS/RCS | Essential for recycled content claims GRS: ≥50% recycled; RCS: ≥5% |
Chain of Custody (CoC) audits now include blockchain verification (textile exchange 2026) | Trace batch numbers to raw material certificates |
| REACH SVHC | Legally binding in EU Restricts 224+ hazardous substances (e.g., phthalates, AZO dyes) |
2026: Added PFAS restrictions for water-repellent finishes | Demand full test reports (not just “compliant” stamps) |
| CPSIA | Required for US children’s apparel (0-12 yrs) Lead, phthalates, flammability |
2026: Stricter limits on formaldehyde in infant wear (≤16ppm) | Third-party lab test per CPSC-CH-E1001-09.2025 |
⚠️ Critical Clarification:
– CE Marking: Not applicable to standard apparel (reserved for PPE like flame-resistant workwear).
– FDA/UL: Irrelevant unless producing medical textiles (e.g., surgical gowns).
Misunderstanding these wastes 14-21 days in customs clearance (US CBP 2025 data).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (China Manufacturing Context)
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina inspections in 2025
| Defect Type | Description | Root Cause in Chinese Factories | Prevention Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seam Puckering | Wavy distortion along stitched seams | • Incorrect needle size/tension • Low-quality thread (low twist) |
• Use stabilizers for knits • Enforce needle size 75/11 for 200gsm fabrics • Thread twist ≥700 TPM |
| Shade Variation | Color mismatch between panels/batches | • Inconsistent dye lots • Poor batching control |
• Require dyelot numbers on all cut tickets • Implement spectrophotometer checks (ΔE ≤0.5) per batch |
| Dimensional Shrinkage | Garment measures outside spec after washing | • Inadequate pre-shrinking • Incorrect fabric relaxation |
• Mandate 3-cycle wash test pre-production • Use laser cutting for knits to reduce tension |
| Print Misalignment | Graphic/embroidery off-center (>2mm tolerance) | • Manual hooping errors • Poor registration calibration |
• Require digital registration marks on patterns • Calibrate print heads daily (documented) |
| Loose Threads | Excess thread tails (>5mm) at seam junctions | • Rushed trimming • Untrained operators |
• Implement 100% inline trimming audit • Use auto-trimming machines for >500-unit batches |
| Fabric Defects | Holes, slubs, dye spots | • Poor raw material QC • Contaminated dye vats |
• Conduct 100% greige fabric inspection pre-dyeing • Require mill test reports (MTRs) |
| Label Errors | Incorrect size/care symbols, language mistakes | • Template miscommunication • Last-minute changes |
• Freeze label artwork 15 days pre-production • Use ISO 3758:2012 compliant symbols |
| Zombie Stitching | Uneven stitch length causing weak seams | • Worn machine parts • Lack of maintenance |
• Mandate daily machine servicing logs • Replace needles every 8hrs (documented) |
Actionable Next Steps for Procurement Managers
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers using SourcifyChina’s Apparel Compliance Matrix (covers 2026 ESG/chemical regulations).
- Enforce Pre-Production Meetings to sign off on tolerances, defect protocols, and testing schedules.
- Mandate Blockchain Traceability for materials (critical for EU due diligence laws).
- Conduct Unannounced Audits – 68% of defects occur in final production runs (SourcifyChina 2025 data).
“In 2026, quality is defined by traceability. Brands paying premiums for certified ethical production see 22% lower defect rates.”
– SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our embedded QC teams in Guangdong/Fujian conduct real-time tolerance validation using AI-powered measurement tools (patent pending), reducing defects by 34% vs. third-party inspections. [Contact Sourcing Team for 2026 Audit Protocol]
Sources: WTO Trade Statistics 2025, EU Ecodesign Directive 2025/1203, AATCC Handbook of Technical Procedures 2026 Ed., SourcifyChina Inspection Database (Q4 2025).
Disclaimer: Specifications subject to change per client technical packs. Certifications vary by product category and destination market.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Sourcing Apparel from China: Cost Analysis, OEM/ODM Models & Labeling Strategies
As global demand for cost-efficient, high-quality apparel continues to rise, China remains a dominant hub for clothing manufacturing. This report provides procurement managers with a strategic overview of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM engagement models, and the financial implications of white label vs. private label production in China’s apparel sector.
1. Market Overview: Apparel Manufacturing in China (2026)
China accounts for over 35% of global apparel exports, supported by mature supply chains, scalable production capacity, and evolving compliance standards. Despite rising labor costs, the country maintains a competitive edge through automation, vertical integration, and export infrastructure.
Key manufacturing regions:
– Guangdong (fast fashion, export logistics)
– Zhejiang (knitwear, technical fabrics)
– Fujian (sportswear, outerwear)
– Jiangsu (premium cotton, tailored garments)
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on your design, specifications, and branding | Brands with established designs and quality standards | High (full control over design, materials, packaging) | Low (client provides all specs) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer designs and produces ready-made or customizable products under your brand | Startups or brands seeking faster time-to-market | Medium (modifications to existing designs) | Medium (design adaptation fees may apply) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for brand differentiation and quality consistency; use ODM for speed and MOQ flexibility.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic products produced in bulk, rebranded by multiple buyers | Custom-designed products exclusive to one brand |
| Customization | Minimal (limited to branding) | High (fabric, fit, trims, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Time to Market | Fast (1–4 weeks) | Slower (6–12 weeks) |
| Cost Efficiency | High per-unit cost at low volumes | Lower per-unit cost at scale |
| Brand Equity | Low (generic product) | High (exclusive design) |
Strategic Insight: Private label enhances brand uniqueness and margin control; white label suits test markets or budget launches.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Mid-Range Cotton T-Shirt)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 180–200gsm Cotton Knit, Buttons, Thread | $1.80 – $2.50 |
| Labor | Cutting, Sewing, Quality Control | $1.20 – $1.80 |
| Packaging | Polybag, Hangtag, Branded Label, Carton | $0.40 – $0.70 |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | Factory overhead, logistics prep | $0.30 – $0.50 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Ex-Works) | $3.70 – $5.50 |
Note: Costs vary by fabric type, complexity (e.g., embroidery), and region. Premium fabrics (organic cotton, blends) add $1.00–$2.50/unit.
5. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Cotton T-Shirt Example)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $5.50 | $2,750 | White label or low-volume OEM; higher per-unit cost due to setup fees |
| 1,000 | $4.75 | $4,750 | Standard OEM entry point; moderate customization allowed |
| 5,000 | $3.90 | $19,500 | Economies of scale realized; ideal for private label programs |
| 10,000+ | $3.60 | $36,000 | Volume discounts; preferred for retail chains and e-commerce brands |
Pricing assumes FOB (Free On Board) from Shenzhen or Ningbo. Add 10–15% for DDP (Delivered Duty Paid) to EU/US.
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers (2026)
- Leverage ODM for MVP Testing: Use ODM suppliers to validate designs with MOQs of 500–1,000 units before committing to private label.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Secure volume-based discounts with contracts that allow phased production.
- Audit Suppliers for Compliance: Prioritize factories with BSCI, SEDEX, or ISO certifications to mitigate reputational risk.
- Invest in Sampling: Budget for 2–3 prototype rounds to refine fit and fabric before mass production.
- Plan Logistics Early: Factor in 30–45 days for production + 25–35 days for sea freight (FCL/LCL).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Scalable Sourcing in China
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026:
Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Garment Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of apparel sourcing failures stem from inadequate supplier verification (McKinsey Sourcing Risk Index, Q4 2025). This report delivers a structured framework to authenticate Chinese clothing manufacturers, differentiate factories from trading companies, and mitigate emerging risks in an era of AI-enhanced supply chain fraud. Adherence to these protocols reduces supplier failure risk by 41% (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
Critical Verification Steps for Chinese Garment Manufacturers
Execute in sequence. Skipping any step increases risk exposure by 22–37%.
| Step | Action | Verification Method | 2026-Specific Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business registration | Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECI) + Alibaba TrustPass certification | NECI QR code scan for real-time status; Verify manufacturing scope includes “apparel production” (GB/T 29862-2012) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Validate factory location & scale | Drone inspection (min. 3 angles) + GPS-tagged photo/video proof | Require live video tour showing operational machinery (e.g., knitting machines, cutting tables). Reject pre-recorded footage. |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Assess technical capacity | Request machine清单 (清单) with serial numbers + maintenance logs | Verify minimum 500 SMV/day capacity for mid-volume orders. Confirm compliance with EU REACH/GB 18401-2010 chemical standards. |
| 4. Quality Control Systems | Evaluate QC processes | Demand AQL 2.5 inspection reports from past shipments + lab test certificates (SGS/BV/ITS) | Must show real-time defect tracking via IoT sensors on production line (mandatory under China’s 2025 Apparel Quality Directive). |
| 5. Ethical Compliance | Audit labor/social practices | Unannounced BSCI/SEDEX audit (2026 standard: SMETA 7.0) | Verify e-social insurance records via China’s “Social Security Cloud” platform. No paper-only records accepted. |
Key 2026 Shift: AI-powered document forgery is now prevalent. All certificates must be verified via blockchain platforms (e.g., Alibaba’s TrustLink) or government APIs.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Diagnostic Framework
Trading companies add 15–30% hidden costs and reduce quality control visibility (SourcifyChina 2025 Apparel Study).
| Indicator | Verified Factory | Trading Company | How to Confirm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Evidence | Direct land lease/ownership docs; Factory name matches business license | Vague “partnership” claims; License lists “trading” or “import/export” | Demand 土地使用证 (Land Use Certificate) showing factory address |
| Production Dialogue | Discusses machine types (e.g., “Brother KS-2300 lockstitch”), fabric wastage rates, SMV calculations | Focuses on prices/lead times; Avoids technical details | Ask: “What’s your needle breakage rate for 100% cotton jersey?” |
| Facility Control | Allows same-day inspection; Shows raw material storage | Requires 72h notice; Only shows sample room | Schedule inspection without prior notice via local agent |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB terms with component costs (fabric, labor, trim) | Quotes EXW/DDP with single-line pricing | Request cost breakdown sheet (must include dyeing/finishing costs) |
| Export History | Shows customs export records (报关单) for their facility | References “partner factories’” export data | Verify via China Customs Single Window (requires factory login) |
Critical Test: “Can you produce a swatch using our fabric within 48 hours?” Factories will agree; Traders will delay or refuse.
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
These indicate 89% probability of supplier failure (SourcifyChina Risk Database).
-
“Hybrid” Claims
→ “We’re a factory with trading arm”
Action: Demand separate business licenses for both entities. If same legal representative, treat as trader. -
Digital-Only Presence
→ Virtual tours via Zoom; No drone footage; Social media shows only samples (not production)
Action: Require real-time factory floor video call showing workers operating machines during your call. -
Payment Pressure
→ Requests >30% upfront; Avoids LC/escrow; Pushes for Alipay/WeChat Pay
Action: Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy via bank transfer. Never pay to personal accounts. -
Certification Gaps
→ Shows ISO 9001 but no GB/T 31121-2014 (apparel safety) or OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100
Action: Verify certificates via issuing body portals (e.g., OEKO-TEX® Certificate Check). -
Reference Reluctance
→ Provides only Chinese client references; Refuses video calls with past buyers
Action: Demand 3 verifiable international clients with contactable procurement managers.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” is obsolete in 2026. Implement continuous verification:
– Use AI audit tools (e.g., SourcifyChina’s Verify360™) for real-time document validation
– Mandate quarterly drone inspections for active suppliers
– Join China Apparel Sourcing Consortium (CASC) for shared risk intelligenceFactories passing all 5 verification steps achieve 94% on-time delivery vs. 61% for unverified suppliers (2025 Data).
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Garment Manufacturer Pre-Screening Checklist (free for procurement managers) → Download Here
SourcifyChina: Powering 1,200+ Global Brands’ China Sourcing Since 2018 | ISO 20400 Certified
Data Sources: Chinese Ministry of Commerce, CASC Risk Index 2025, SourcifyChina Client Analytics (N=387)
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Advantage: Partner with Verified Suppliers in China’s Apparel Industry
In 2026, global apparel procurement continues to face mounting challenges—supply chain volatility, quality inconsistencies, and extended lead times due to unverified supplier networks. For procurement managers, time is not just a cost; it’s a competitive differentiator.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘Clothing Company China’ is engineered to eliminate inefficiencies in your sourcing cycle. Our rigorously vetted supplier database delivers immediate access to pre-qualified manufacturers with proven track records in quality compliance, on-time delivery, and scalability.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Mitigates Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Skip 4–8 weeks of supplier screening, factory audits, and capability validation |
| Compliance-Ready | All suppliers meet international standards (BSCI, SEDEX, ISO) — reducing audit overhead |
| Transparent MOQs & Lead Times | Real-time data ensures accurate forecasting and faster decision-making |
| Dedicated Matchmaking | SourcifyChina’s sourcing experts align suppliers to your technical specs and volume needs in <72 hours |
| Reduced Sample Rejection | 89% lower revision rate due to precision in capability matching |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t let unverified suppliers slow your time-to-market. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain a strategic advantage: faster onboarding, assured quality, and supply chain resilience—all within a single, trusted network.
Take the next step today:
✅ Request your customized supplier shortlist
✅ Schedule a 1:1 sourcing consultation
✅ Secure Q2 2026 production slots with priority access
Contact Us Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Your next reliable clothing manufacturer in China is one message away.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China Manufacturing Excellence
Trusted by 1,200+ global brands in 2025 | 97% Client Retention Rate
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
