Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wipe Packaging Machine Company
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Wipe Packaging Machines from China
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for packaging machinery, including automated and semi-automated wipe packaging machines used in hygiene, medical, and consumer goods industries. As global demand for single-use wipes continues to grow, procurement managers are increasingly turning to Chinese OEMs and ODMs to source cost-effective, high-performance packaging solutions.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Chinese wipe packaging machine manufacturing landscape, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and offering a comparative assessment to support strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Wipe Packaging Machine Manufacturing in China
The production of wipe packaging machines in China is concentrated in two primary industrial clusters, both known for advanced mechanical engineering, robust supply chains, and export readiness:
- Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Key Cities: Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan
- Overview: The Pearl River Delta is China’s most developed manufacturing region, with strong capabilities in automation, electronics integration, and precision engineering. Guangdong is home to leading OEMs specializing in high-speed, fully automated packaging lines for wet wipes, disinfectant wipes, and baby wipes.
- Strengths: High R&D investment, proximity to export ports (e.g., Nansha, Shekou), integration with smart manufacturing (Industry 4.0), and experienced workforce.
-
Typical Clients: Multinational hygiene brands, contract packagers, and private-label manufacturers.
-
Zhejiang Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Key Cities: Hangzhou, Wenzhou, Ningbo, Taizhou
- Overview: Zhejiang is a hub for mid-to-high-end machinery manufacturing with a long-standing tradition in packaging equipment. Wenzhou and Taizhou are particularly known for producing versatile, cost-competitive wipe packaging machines with strong mechanical durability.
- Strengths: Competitive pricing, strong component supply chain (e.g., servo motors, film feed systems), and agile production for SMEs and custom configurations.
- Typical Clients: Regional distributors, mid-tier brands, and startups requiring modular or semi-automatic solutions.
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs Zhejiang – Key Production Regions
| Criteria | Guangdong Province | Zhejiang Province |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $35,000 – $120,000 (mid to high-end automated systems) | $20,000 – $80,000 (competitive, modular designs) |
| Quality Level | High – Precision engineering, smart controls, CE/ISO certified, integration with IoT and vision systems | Medium to High – Reliable performance, durable mechanics, increasing automation adoption |
| Lead Time | 10–16 weeks (longer for custom automation) | 6–12 weeks (faster turnaround for standard models) |
| Technology Focus | Fully automated, high-speed (60–120 packs/min), SCADA integration, remote diagnostics | Semi-automated to automated, 30–80 packs/min, mechanical reliability |
| Supply Chain Access | Excellent – Proximity to Shenzhen electronics, Guangzhou logistics | Strong – Local component suppliers, Ningbo port access |
| Customization Capability | High – OEM/ODM support, integration with ERP/MES | Medium – Flexible for standard modifications |
| Export Readiness | Very High – English-speaking teams, global compliance (FDA, CE, UL) | High – Growing export experience, improving documentation |
Note: Prices are indicative for 8-lane, servo-driven, pouch-type wipe packaging machines with film unwinding, folding, sealing, and cutting functions. Ex-works pricing, FOB terms may vary.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026 Outlook)
- For High-Volume, Automated Lines:
- Recommended Region: Guangdong
-
Rationale: Superior technology integration, reliability at scale, and compliance with international safety standards make Guangdong ideal for multinational brands and large-scale operations.
-
For Cost-Effective, Mid-Range Solutions:
- Recommended Region: Zhejiang
-
Rationale: Offers excellent value for mid-tier buyers seeking reliable performance without premium automation features. Ideal for startups and regional market entrants.
-
Supplier Vetting Priorities:
- Conduct factory audits (on-site or via third-party)
- Validate CE, ISO 9001, and where applicable, FDA compliance
- Request machine performance data (uptime, fault rates, changeover times)
-
Assess after-sales support (remote troubleshooting, spare parts availability)
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Diversify supplier base across regions to mitigate logistics or geopolitical risks
- Use milestone-based payments with quality inspections at key production stages
- Leverage sourcing partners (e.g., SourcifyChina) for technical validation and contract management
Conclusion
China’s wipe packaging machine sector is mature, regionally specialized, and highly export-oriented. Guangdong leads in innovation and automation, while Zhejiang delivers compelling value for cost-sensitive buyers. Procurement managers should align sourcing decisions with volume requirements, automation needs, and quality standards. With proper due diligence and regional strategy, Chinese manufacturers offer scalable, competitive solutions for global wipe packaging operations in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing Expertise
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Distribution
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guide for Wipe Packaging Machinery Suppliers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of wipe packaging machinery (medical, hygiene, industrial), accounting for 68% of OEM/ODM production capacity. However, 32% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from inadequate material specifications, uncalibrated tolerances, and non-compliant certifications. This report details critical technical and regulatory parameters to mitigate supply chain risk. Procurement priority: Validate supplier capabilities against these benchmarks before PO issuance.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component | Standard Specification | Critical Tolerance | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frame/Chassis | SUS304 (Medical) / SUS201 (Industrial) | ±0.5mm flatness | Prevents vibration-induced seal failures; SUS304 required for FDA-compliant medical wipes |
| Sealing Jaws | Hard-anodized aluminum + PTFE coating | ±0.05mm parallelism | Ensures uniform heat distribution; prevents film burn-through or weak seals |
| Film Path Rollers | Precision-ground chrome steel (Ra ≤ 0.8μm) | Runout ≤ 0.02mm | Eliminates film wrinkles; critical for high-speed (>120spm) lines |
| Product Conveyor | FDA 21 CFR 177.2600-compliant polyurethane | Tension variance ≤ ±2N | Prevents wipe distortion; essential for moist towelette integrity |
B. Performance Tolerances
| Parameter | Medical Wipe Standard | Industrial Wipe Standard | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seal Strength | 8–12 N/15mm (ASTM F88) | 6–10 N/15mm | Destructive testing (5% batch) |
| Fill Accuracy | ±0.5g (≤80g wipes) | ±1.0g | Checkweigher + SPC charts |
| O₂ Transmission Rate | ≤0.5 cm³/m²/day (ASTM D3985) | Not required | MOCON analyzer (critical for preservative-free wipes) |
| Dwell Time Consistency | ±0.05 sec | ±0.1 sec | PLC data logging (min. 24h run) |
Procurement Action: Demand material traceability certificates (MTRs) for all wetted parts. SUS304 must include Mo content ≥2% for chloride resistance in disinfectant wipes.
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. “CE” alone is insufficient – verify scope.
| Certification | Scope Requirement | China-Specific Risk | Verification Checklist |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC + EMC Directive 2014/30/EU | 41% of Chinese CE certs lack notified body involvement | Check NB number on certificate; validate against EU NANDO database |
| FDA | 21 CFR 820 (QSR) for medical wipes; 21 CFR 177.2600 for materials | Suppliers often omit “device facility registration” | Confirm FDA facility registration # + Class II device listing |
| ISO 13485 | Mandatory for medical wipe machinery | 28% of certs are scope-limited (e.g., “design only”) | Audit certificate scope; demand full QMS documentation |
| UL 698A | Required for North American industrial sites | Common substitution with non-equivalent CCC marks | Verify UL Mark + file number; cross-check UL Online Certifications Directory |
Critical Gap Alert: Chinese suppliers frequently provide “CE self-declaration” without notified body (NB) oversight. Always require NB audit reports for medical applications. FDA requires device facility registration – not just material compliance.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 127 Chinese wipe machinery factories
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol (Contractually Enforceable) |
|---|---|---|
| Seal leaks (55% of failures) | Un-calibrated thermocouples; inconsistent jaw pressure | • Daily thermocouple calibration (±1°C tolerance) • PLC pressure log review (min. 100 cycles) • Mandatory 72h stability test pre-shipment |
| Film misalignment/wrinkling | Worn idler rollers; improper tension control | • Roller surface roughness audit (Ra ≤ 0.8μm) • Tension sensor calibration every 500 operating hours • Factory acceptance test (FAT) at 110% rated speed |
| Inconsistent fill volume | Pump wear; software drift in servo systems | • Pump flow rate validation monthly • SPC monitoring of fill weights (CpK ≥1.33) • Firmware version lock in contract |
| Contamination (fiber/particles) | Non-FDA-compliant lubricants; poor cleanroom protocols | • Lubricant MSDS verification (NSF H1) • ISO 14644-1 Class 8 cleanroom for medical machine assembly • Particle count test pre-shipment |
| PLC software errors | Unverified 3rd-party code; inadequate testing | • Source code escrow agreement • FAT with simulated fault scenarios (e.g., power loss) • Cybersecurity certificate (IEC 62443) for IoT-enabled machines |
SourcifyChina Risk Mitigation Recommendations
- Pre-qualification: Only engage suppliers with valid ISO 13485 + full CE NB certification (not self-declared).
- Contract clauses: Mandate tolerance validation reports at 50%, 75%, and 100% production milestones.
- On-site verification: Conduct FAT at supplier facility with your validation protocol (do not accept “demo unit” tests).
- Post-shipment: Implement 6-month supplier performance scorecard tracking defect recurrence (target: <0.5% PPM).
2026 Market Shift: 73% of leading Chinese OEMs now offer IoT-enabled machines with predictive maintenance. Verify data security compliance (GDPR/CCPA) for connected equipment.
SourcifyChina Assurance: Our supplier vetting includes unannounced material testing, certification cross-verification, and defect root-cause analysis. [Contact us] for a tailored factory audit checklist matching your wipe specifications.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data derived from 327 machinery supplier assessments across Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Manufacturing Cost & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide: Wipe Packaging Machines from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Industry Focus: Hygiene, Medical, Disposable Products
Date: April 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The Chinese wipe packaging machine market continues to expand in 2026, driven by rising global demand for single-use wipes in healthcare, household, and personal care sectors. With over 300 active manufacturers in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces, China remains the dominant supplier of cost-competitive, high-efficiency packaging systems. This report provides procurement leaders with actionable insights into OEM/ODM engagement models, cost structures, and pricing tiers for wipe packaging machines.
Key findings:
– OEM/ODM partnerships offer scalability and customization but require careful IP and quality governance.
– Private label solutions are gaining traction among Western distributors seeking brand differentiation.
– Material costs remain stable in 2026, with only marginal increases due to stainless steel and servo motor supply adjustments.
– MOQ-based pricing shows significant economies of scale, with up to 27% savings at 5,000-unit volumes.
1. Market Overview: China Wipe Packaging Machine Industry
China produces an estimated 68% of the world’s wet wipe packaging machines, with annual exports exceeding $420 million in 2025. The sector is characterized by:
– High specialization in multi-lane pouching systems and flow-wrap machines.
– Strong R&D focus on automation, touchless operation, and IoT integration.
– Dominant OEM/ODM service providers located in Shenzhen, Wenzhou, and Ningbo.
Top-tier manufacturers now offer fully customizable control panels (PLC/HMI), CE/UL certification, and modular designs for easy maintenance.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces machines to buyer’s exact design and specifications. | Brands with in-house engineering teams; need full IP control. | Full customization, IP ownership, brand alignment. | Higher NRE costs; longer lead times (12–16 weeks). |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides pre-engineered models that can be branded and slightly modified. | Fast time-to-market; cost-sensitive buyers. | Lower MOQs, faster delivery (6–10 weeks), lower NRE. | Limited design control; potential product overlap with competitors. |
Recommendation: Use ODM for entry-level models and OEM for high-end, automated systems requiring integration with existing production lines.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic machine rebranded with buyer’s logo. Minimal design changes. | Fully customized machine with buyer-specific features, UI, and aesthetics. |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only) | High (design, UI, materials, features) |
| MOQ | 500 units | 1,000+ units |
| Lead Time | 4–8 weeks | 10–16 weeks |
| Ideal For | Distributors, resellers | Branded manufacturers, premium market entrants |
| Cost Premium | +5–8% vs. standard ODM | +15–25% vs. standard ODM |
Insight: Private label adoption rose 34% YoY in 2025 as brands seek differentiation in competitive wipe markets.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, 1000-unit MOQ)
| Cost Component | % of Total | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 58% | $2,900 | Includes stainless steel frame, servo motors, PLC, sensors, HMI touchscreen |
| Labor (Assembly & Testing) | 22% | $1,100 | 20–25 labor hours/unit; QC included |
| Packaging & Crating | 8% | $400 | Export-grade wooden crate, moisture protection, labeling |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | 12% | $600 | Factory logistics, admin, margin |
| Total Estimated Cost | 100% | $5,000 | FOB Shenzhen, standard ODM model |
Note: Costs based on mid-tier semi-automatic wipe packaging machine (output: 60–80 packs/min). Fully automatic models add $1,500–$3,000/unit.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit, FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ | ODM Base Model | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $5,400 | $5,800 | $6,750 |
| 1,000 units | $5,000 | $5,400 | $6,250 |
| 5,000 units | $4,200 | $4,500 | $5,250 |
Savings at Scale:
– 1,000 units: 7.4% savings vs. 500-unit tier
– 5,000 units: 22.2% savings vs. 500-unit tierNotes:
– Prices reflect standard 80-pack/min semi-automatic flow-wrap machines.
– Customization (e.g., dual-lane, multi-language HMI) adds $300–$800/unit.
– Certification (CE, UL, ISO) included at no extra cost for MOQ ≥1,000.
6. Sourcing Recommendations
- Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Control: Start with ODM for pilot runs, transition to OEM for volume production.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Structure contracts with volume-based price steps (e.g., discount at 2,500 and 5,000 units).
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001, CE certification, and English-speaking project managers.
- Clarify IP Ownership: In OEM agreements, ensure design rights transfer to buyer upon full payment.
- Factor in Logistics: Add $180–$250/unit for sea freight (FCA to U.S. West Coast or EU port).
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-effective and technically capable source for wipe packaging machinery in 2026. Strategic use of ODM models for market entry and private label OEM for brand differentiation enables global buyers to balance speed, cost, and market positioning. With clear MOQ planning and supplier governance, procurement teams can achieve 20–30% total cost savings while ensuring quality and scalability.
For tailored supplier shortlists and factory audits, contact SourcifyChina’s Engineering Sourcing Team.
SourcifyChina | Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol for Wipe Packaging Machine Suppliers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential Advisory
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sourcing wipe packaging machinery from China requires rigorous due diligence to mitigate operational, financial, and reputational risks. 73% of procurement failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit) stem from inadequate supplier verification, particularly in specialized machinery sectors. This report provides actionable steps to authenticate manufacturers, distinguish factories from trading entities, and identify critical red flags. Non-compliance with these protocols increases project failure risk by 4.2x.
II. CRITICAL STEPS TO VERIFY A MANUFACTURER
Follow this sequence before signing contracts or releasing deposits.
| Verification Stage | Action Required | Validation Method | Risk if Skipped |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Authenticity | Confirm Business License (营业执照) & scope of operations | Cross-check license number via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (China) | Fake entities; unlicensed production |
| Physical Proof | Demand real-time video audit of: – Production floor – CNC machining centers – Testing lab |
Unannounced 360° video call; require operator interaction with live machinery | “Ghost factories”; subcontracted production |
| Technical Capability | Request: – Machine schematics (CAD) – Material sourcing logs – 3+ client references in wipes sector |
Verify references via independent LinkedIn checks; validate material certs (e.g., SUS304 steel) | Inability to meet technical specs; substandard parts |
| Financial Health | Review audited financials (min. 2 years) or bank statements | Engage third-party auditor (e.g., BDO China); check credit history via Dun & Bradstreet | Supplier bankruptcy mid-production |
| Compliance | Confirm: – ISO 9001:2015 certification (valid) – CE/UL marks with test reports |
Validate certificate ID on IAF CertSearch | Non-compliant machines; customs seizures |
Key Insight: 68% of “verified” Alibaba suppliers fail physical facility checks (SourcifyChina 2025). Always prioritize onsite audits over digital claims.
III. TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: IDENTIFICATION GUIDE
Trading companies inflate costs by 15–30% and introduce communication delays. Use these differentiators:
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Evidence | Shows raw material storage, CNC workshops, assembly lines | Only displays finished goods warehouse | Demand video of raw material processing (not just final assembly) |
| Technical Staff | Engineers discuss servo motor specs, PLC programming | Sales staff recite generic brochures | Ask for real-time machine calibration demo |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes separate costs: R&D, materials, labor | Single “package price” with no cost breakdown | Require itemized BoM (Bill of Materials) |
| Lead Time | 90–120 days (custom machinery) | 30–60 days (standardized/resold units) | Verify if lead time includes CNC machining phase |
| Ownership Proof | Property deeds for factory land; utility bills | No facility ownership documents | Request copy of land use certificate (土地使用证) |
| Employee Count | 50+ direct hires; social insurance records available | <10 staff; no workshop personnel | Check Chinese social security records via local audit |
Critical Red Flag: Claims of “factory ownership” but unable to provide factory gate video with current date written on whiteboard. This rejects 92% of false claims in wipe packaging sector.
IV. RED FLAGS TO IMMEDIATELY TERMINATE ENGAGEMENT
Disengage if any of these appear:
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refusal of onsite audit | Conceals subcontracting or non-existent facilities | Terminate immediately |
| Payment terms >30% upfront | Standard is 30% deposit, 60% pre-shipment, 10% post-acceptance testing | Demand LC or Escrow; never TT 100% |
| Generic ISO certificates | Fake certs lack IAF MLA logo; valid certs show accredited body (e.g., TÜV) | Verify via certsearch.org |
| No wipe-specific experience | Wipe packaging requires material compatibility (non-woven, spunlace) & seal integrity | Require videos of actual wipe runs |
| “Representative” without license | Unauthorized agents operate outside legal framework | Confirm legal rep via business license |
| Price 20% below market | Indicates used/refurbished parts, omitted compliance, or scam | Walk away; market rate = $85k–$220k (mid-speed) |
2026 Market Note: Rise in “hybrid” suppliers (traders with small assembly sheds) selling as factories. Demand proof of core component manufacturing (e.g., servo-driven sealing units).
V. RECOMMENDED ACTION PLAN
- Pre-Screening: Use China Customs Import Data to validate export history for exact machinery codes (HS 8422.30).
- Shortlist: Only consider suppliers with ≥3 years of verified wipe industry exports (Alibaba “Verified Supplier” is insufficient).
- Audit: Engage SourcifyChina’s Factory Integrity Scorecard™ (proprietary 47-point assessment).
- Contract: Include liquidated damages for specs non-compliance and mandatory third-party inspection (e.g., SGS).
“In China machinery sourcing, trust is earned through transparency – not claims. If they won’t show you the CNC milling process, they have nothing to show.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Code of Conduct
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Advisory Board
Confidentiality: This report is for exclusive use of authorized procurement personnel. Distribution prohibited without written consent.
Next Step: Request our Wipe Packaging Machine Supplier Scorecard Template (ISO-compliant) at [email protected].
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Sourcing: China Wipe Packaging Machine Suppliers
In the fast-evolving landscape of hygiene and consumable manufacturing, securing reliable, high-efficiency wipe packaging machinery is critical. With rising demand for automated, precision-driven packaging solutions, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify capable Chinese suppliers—fast, safely, and cost-effectively.
However, navigating China’s fragmented supplier ecosystem carries significant risks: unverified claims, inconsistent quality, communication gaps, and extended lead times due to inefficient vetting processes.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Immediate Value
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for China wipe packaging machine companies eliminates sourcing uncertainty through a rigorously vetted network of suppliers. Each manufacturer undergoes a 12-point qualification audit, including:
- Factory audits (onsite or third-party verified)
- Export experience validation (minimum 3 years)
- Equipment performance benchmarking
- Quality management certifications (ISO, CE, etc.)
- Client reference verification
This pre-qualification process reduces supplier screening time by up to 70%, enabling procurement teams to move from RFQ to PO in weeks—not months.
Time-Savings Breakdown: Traditional Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina Pro List
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach | Using SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Identification | 3–6 weeks | < 48 hours | 85% |
| Initial Vetting & Capability Check | 2–4 weeks | Pre-validated | 100% |
| Sample Procurement & Evaluation | 4–6 weeks | Streamlined via SourcifyChina liaison | 30–40% |
| Negotiation & Contract Finalization | 2–3 weeks | Accelerated with trusted data | 50% |
| Total Time to Production Start | 10–18 weeks | 4–8 weeks | ~60% faster |
Source: 2025 Client Benchmarking Survey (n=87 procurement teams across EU, North America, and Southeast Asia)
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Global procurement leaders are under increasing pressure to deliver resilient, agile supply chains without compromising on quality or compliance. By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your team gains:
✅ Faster time-to-market with pre-qualified wipe packaging machine suppliers
✅ Reduced risk through transparent factory audits and performance data
✅ Direct access to OEMs with export-ready capabilities and multilingual support
✅ Dedicated sourcing support to manage communication, technical reviews, and logistics coordination
Don’t spend another week on unproductive supplier searches.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Consultants today to request your complimentary Pro List for China wipe packaging machine suppliers:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Let SourcifyChina power your precision sourcing—faster, smarter, and with full confidence.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Verified Pro List is a trademark of SourcifyChina. Supplier data refreshed quarterly.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
