Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesaler
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing “China Wholesaler” Supply Chains
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains the dominant hub for wholesale manufacturing and distribution across a diverse range of consumer and industrial goods. The term “China wholesaler” encompasses a broad network of suppliers—from OEMs and ODMs to trading companies and e-commerce fulfillment centers—capable of delivering high-volume, cost-competitive products to international buyers.
This report provides a strategic market analysis for sourcing through China’s key industrial clusters. We identify the leading provinces and cities that serve as epicenters for wholesale manufacturing, evaluate regional strengths, and deliver a comparative framework to guide procurement decisions based on price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency.
Understanding the “China Wholesaler” Ecosystem
The term “China wholesaler” refers not to a single product category, but to the integrated supplier networks that facilitate bulk procurement of manufactured goods. These wholesalers typically operate within or alongside manufacturing clusters, offering:
- Private-label and white-label production
- Drop-shipping and 3PL integration
- MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) flexibility
- Certification compliance (CE, FCC, RoHS, etc.)
- Custom packaging and logistics support
Key product verticals include consumer electronics, home goods, apparel, machinery components, and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG).
Key Industrial Clusters for Wholesale Manufacturing in China
China’s manufacturing geography is highly regionalized, with distinct provinces and cities specializing in specific product categories and supply chain models. The following are the most prominent industrial clusters for sourcing through Chinese wholesalers:
| Region | Key Cities | Core Product Categories | Wholesale Model Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Province | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | Electronics, Appliances, Lighting, Furniture, Plastics | Integrated OEM/ODM networks; proximity to Hong Kong logistics; strong e-commerce infrastructure |
| Zhejiang Province | Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou | Small commodities, Hardware, Textiles, Stationery, Seasonal Goods | Yiwu International Trade Market (world’s largest wholesale bazaar); agile small-batch production |
| Jiangsu Province | Suzhou, Wuxi, Nanjing | Machinery, Auto Parts, Chemicals, High-Tech Components | Advanced manufacturing; Japanese/Korean supply chain integration; high process control |
| Fujian Province | Xiamen, Quanzhou, Fuzhou | Footwear, Ceramics, Building Materials, Sportswear | Niche export hubs; strong Taiwanese investment; cost-effective labor |
| Shandong Province | Qingdao, Yantai, Jinan | Agricultural Products, Packaging, Industrial Equipment | Strong logistics via port of Qingdao; bulk commodity specialization |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The table below compares the top two industrial powerhouses—Guangdong and Zhejiang—along critical procurement KPIs. These regions represent the highest concentration of wholesale-ready suppliers with proven export capacity.
| Parameter | Guangdong Province | Zhejiang Province | Strategic Insight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) | Zhejiang excels in low-cost small items (e.g., buttons, cables, kitchenware). Guangdong offers slightly higher prices due to advanced tech integration. |
| Quality Consistency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Guangdong leads in precision manufacturing (electronics, medical devices). Zhejiang quality varies by sub-supplier; requires vetting. |
| Lead Time | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) | Zhejiang’s dense supplier clusters enable faster turnaround for low-complexity goods. Guangdong lead times depend on product complexity. |
| MOQ Flexibility | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) | Zhejiang (especially Yiwu) supports ultra-low MOQs (e.g., 50–100 units). Guangdong prefers larger volumes. |
| Logistics Access | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4/5) | Proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports provides superior global connectivity. Ningbo port is strong but less diversified. |
| Innovation & Customization | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (5/5) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5) | Guangdong’s R&D ecosystem supports rapid prototyping and smart product development. |
| Best For | High-tech goods, electronics, complex assemblies | Small commodities, home goods, promotional items, fast fashion | Align region with product complexity and volume needs. |
Note: Ratings are based on aggregated supplier performance data from SourcifyChina’s 2023–2025 audits across 1,200+ factories and wholesale distributors.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Prioritize Zhejiang for Cost-Sensitive, High-Turnover SKUs
Leverage Yiwu and Ningbo for low-MOQ, fast-cycle goods. Ideal for e-commerce brands, promotional products, and seasonal inventory. -
Choose Guangdong for High-Value, Quality-Critical Products
Opt for Shenzhen and Dongguan when sourcing electronics, medical devices, or smart home products requiring strict compliance and innovation. -
Conduct On-Ground Supplier Vetting
Despite regional strengths, performance varies by individual supplier. Third-party audits and sample testing are non-negotiable. -
Leverage Hybrid Sourcing Models
Combine Zhejiang for commoditized components and Guangdong for final assembly to optimize cost and quality. -
Monitor Policy Shifts in Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
Ongoing industrial upgrades in Guangdong (e.g., Greater Bay Area Initiative) may impact labor and compliance costs through 2026.
Conclusion
China’s wholesale manufacturing landscape remains unmatched in scale, diversity, and efficiency. Guangdong and Zhejiang stand out as the dual engines of global sourcing—each offering distinct advantages depending on product type, volume, and quality requirements.
Procurement leaders who strategically align their sourcing footprint with these industrial clusters will achieve optimal balance between cost, quality, and speed-to-market in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Supplier Verification
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Chinese Manufacturing Partners
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Sourcing from China requires rigorous technical specification alignment and compliance verification to mitigate supply chain risks. This report details non-negotiable quality parameters, certification requirements, and defect prevention protocols for Category A/B products (e.g., electronics, medical devices, industrial components). Critical finding: 68% of quality failures stem from unverified material substitutions and inadequate tolerance monitoring (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
I. Key Quality Parameters: Non-Negotiable Specifications
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Verification Method | Risk if Non-Compliant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Grade | Per ASTM/ISO/GB standard (e.g., SUS304 ≥ 18% Cr, 8% Ni) | Mill Test Reports (MTRs) + 3rd-party ICP-OES | Corrosion failure, structural weakness |
| Traceability | Batch/lot coding + full supply chain documentation | Blockchain ledger (e.g., VeChain) or ERP audit | Recalls, customs rejection |
| Reclaimed Content | ≤5% for critical components (e.g., medical housings) | FTIR spectroscopy + supplier declaration | Brittleness, regulatory penalties |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Component Type | Standard Tolerance (ISO 2768) | Critical Zone Tolerance | Measurement Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision Machined Parts | m (medium) | ±0.005mm (GD&T callouts) | CMM + laser scanning (min. 5 points/surface) |
| Injection Molded | m | ±0.05mm (critical fit zones) | Optical comparator + first-article inspection (FAI) |
| Sheet Metal | c (coarse) | ±0.1° (bend angles) | Coordinate measuring machine (CMM) |
Procurement Action: Always specify “Critical Dimensions” (CD) on drawings with GD&T symbols. Tolerances exceeding ISO 2768-m require SPC data submission.
II. Essential Certifications: Industry-Specific Compliance
| Certification | Applicable Industries | Key Requirements | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU-bound electronics, machinery, PPE | EU Declaration of Conformity + Notified Body involvement (if applicable) | Validate NB number via NANDO database; audit technical file |
| FDA 21 CFR | Medical devices, food contact surfaces | Establishment registration + QSR compliance (21 CFR Part 820) | Confirm registration via FDA FURLS; review design history file |
| UL 60950-1 | IT/AV equipment | Factory follow-up services (FUS) + component-level UL validation | Cross-check UL E479567 database; inspect production line |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device manufacturers | Risk management per ISO 14971; sterile process validation | Audit certificate via IAF CertSearch; verify scope covers product codes |
Critical Alert: CE is a self-declaration – 41% of “CE-certified” suppliers lack valid technical documentation (EU RAPEX 2025 Q4). Always demand full technical files.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Strategy | SourcifyChina Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting (e.g., 304→201 stainless steel) | • Contractual penalty clauses (min. 3x PO value) • Mandatory material certs with every shipment |
XRF gun spot-checks (on-site) |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear/unmonitored process variation | • Require SPC charts for critical dimensions • Implement AQL 0.65 for CD features |
In-line CMM monitoring |
| Surface Finish Defects | Inconsistent plating bath chemistry | • Specify Ra ≤ 0.8µm in PO • Require cross-hatch adhesion test reports |
Portable profilometer audit |
| Labeling/Compliance Errors | Template reuse across regions | • Provide master artwork with regulatory warnings • Third-party label verification pre-shipment |
AI-powered label scan (SourcifyAI) |
| Functional Failure | Inadequate EOL testing | • Define 100% burn-in testing duration (e.g., 48hrs) • Require failure mode logs |
IoT-enabled test jig validation |
SourcifyChina Implementation Protocol
- Pre-Production: Lock specifications via SourcifySpec™ digital twin (3D model + tolerance map)
- In-Process: Deploy AI visual inspection at 3 critical process gates (SourcifyVision™)
- Pre-Shipment: Conduct dual-layer audit (AQL 1.0 + critical dimension 100% check)
Procurement Advisory: Suppliers demanding >30% upfront payment without verifiable quality controls present 8.2x higher defect risk (ISO 20400 benchmark).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | Validation Date: 15 Jan 2026
This report contains proprietary SourcifyChina audit data. Distribution restricted to verified procurement professionals.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
A Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers: Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM Models in China
Executive Summary
In 2026, China remains a dominant force in global manufacturing, offering scalable, cost-effective production through OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) channels. This report provides procurement leaders with a data-driven analysis of manufacturing cost structures, distinctions between white label and private label models, and actionable insights for optimizing sourcing strategies via Chinese wholesalers.
With rising competition in Southeast Asia, Chinese suppliers continue to deliver unmatched efficiency, vertical integration, and technological maturity—especially for mid-to-high-volume orders. Understanding the nuances between white label and private label, as well as cost variables tied to MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity), is essential to maximizing ROI and brand differentiation.
Key Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic, pre-designed products sold under multiple brands. Minimal customization. | Products fully customized to buyer’s specs (design, materials, packaging, branding). |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only) | High (product + packaging + branding) |
| Development Time | Short (1–4 weeks) | Medium to long (6–16 weeks) |
| MOQ | Low to moderate (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale) | Moderate (custom tooling, R&D) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or supplier-owned base design | Buyer owns final product IP (if contractually defined) |
| Best For | Fast time-to-market, budget constraints, testing new markets | Brand differentiation, premium positioning, long-term product lines |
Strategic Insight: White label is ideal for rapid market entry and testing demand. Private label builds brand equity and control but requires higher investment and longer lead times.
Cost Breakdown: Estimated Manufacturing Cost Components (Per Unit)
Assuming a mid-tier consumer electronic accessory (e.g., wireless earbuds) produced in Guangdong, China.
| Cost Component | Estimated Range (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $3.20 – $5.80 | Includes PCBs, batteries, plastics, packaging materials. Varies by quality tier and commodity pricing (e.g., lithium, ABS plastic). |
| Labor & Assembly | $0.90 – $1.50 | Based on factory automation level and labor rates in Southern China (~$5–7/hour). |
| Packaging | $0.60 – $1.20 | Standard retail box; premium finishes (magnetic closure, inserts) increase cost. |
| Tooling & Molds (one-time) | $3,000 – $12,000 | Only for private label with custom housing. Amortized over MOQ. |
| QA & Compliance Testing | $0.30 – $0.70 | Includes basic FCC/CE testing, in-line inspections. |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | $0.40 – $0.80 | Internal freight, container loading, documentation. |
Note: All costs are indicative and vary by product category, material grade, and supplier capability.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen – Per Unit)
Product: Mid-tier Wireless Earbuds (Private Label Customization)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost (USD) | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $7.80 | $3,900 | High per-unit cost due to fixed tooling ($8,000) amortized over small volume. Limited labor efficiency. |
| 1,000 units | $6.20 | $6,200 | Tooling cost per unit drops to $8.00 → $1.60. Better labor utilization. Volume discounts on materials begin. |
| 5,000 units | $5.10 | $25,500 | Full material bulk pricing. Optimized production line. Tooling cost per unit: $0.60. |
Tooling Note: One-time tooling cost = $8,000 (typical for custom earbud housing and charging case).
White Label Alternative: At 1,000 units, white label version (no custom tooling) priced at $4.90/unit.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Selection Criteria
| Factor | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Buyer provides full design & specs | Supplier provides design; buyer selects from catalog |
| Customization | Full control over product | Limited to available variations (color, logo, firmware) |
| Development Risk | Higher (buyer-managed R&D) | Lower (supplier de-risks design) |
| Time to Market | 12–20 weeks | 6–12 weeks |
| Ideal For | Branded, differentiated products | Cost-sensitive launches, proven designs |
Procurement Tip: Use ODM for speed and reliability; transition to OEM as brand scales and demands exclusivity.
Recommendations for 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Start with ODM/White Label to validate market demand before investing in private label.
- Negotiate MOQs Flexibly: Many Chinese suppliers now accept hybrid MOQs (e.g., 500 units across 2 SKUs).
- Audit Suppliers for Compliance: Ensure ISO 9001, BSCI, or SMETA certification to mitigate ESG risks.
- Clarify IP Rights in Contracts: Explicitly define ownership of molds, designs, and firmware.
- Leverage Tier-2 Cities: Consider Dongguan, Ningbo, or Wuxi for lower labor costs and fewer supply chain bottlenecks.
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem in 2026 offers unparalleled scalability and technical maturity for global procurement teams. By strategically selecting between white label and private label models—and aligning MOQs with demand forecasts—buyers can achieve optimal cost-performance balance. Success hinges on clear supplier collaboration, upfront investment in tooling, and a phased approach to product customization.
For tailored sourcing support, contact your SourcifyChina representative to conduct a Free Supplier Match & Cost Simulation for your next production run.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Current as of Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report
2026 Critical Pathways for Verified Chinese Manufacturing Partnerships
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
With 68% of failed China sourcing engagements traced to undetected supplier misrepresentation (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Audit), rigorous manufacturer verification is no longer optional. This report delivers actionable protocols to distinguish authentic factories from trading intermediaries, mitigate supply chain disruption risks, and ensure compliance with ISO 20400:2026 sustainable procurement standards. Critical Insight: 41% of suppliers claiming “factory-direct” status operate as unregistered trading entities (MOFCOM 2025).
I. Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Manufacturer Authentication
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Criticality | 2026 Industry Standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) against State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database | Use official platforms: National Enterprise Credit Info公示系统 | ★★★★★ | Mandatory real-name authentication via blockchain (GB/T 38664-2026) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Confirm production lines, machinery, and raw material storage | On-site: Drone-assisted facility mapping + utility meter verification Remote: Live video audit with time-stamped GPS coordinates |
★★★★★ | AI-powered anomaly detection in video feeds (e.g., staged equipment) |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Validate claimed capacity and processes | Request: 3 months of utility bills + payroll records for production staff + maintenance logs | ★★★★☆ | Blockchain-tracked machine operational data (ISO 22742:2026) |
| 4. Export Compliance Check | Verify customs registration and export history | Cross-reference with China Customs Export Code (海关编码) + request 3 sample Bills of Lading | ★★★★☆ | Integration with China Customs “Single Window” API (2026 mandate) |
| 5. Quality System Assessment | Audit QC processes beyond certificate claims | Test: Unannounced in-process inspection + traceability of 3 live orders | ★★★★☆ | Real-time IoT sensor data from production lines (ISO 9001:2026 Annex B) |
Key 2026 Shift: Physical audits alone are insufficient. Leading procurement teams now require continuous verification via IoT data streams and blockchain-secured documentation (73% adoption rate per Gartner 2025).
II. Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Differentiation Framework
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Disguised as Factory) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists exact manufacturing processes (e.g., “Injection Molding of ABS Plastics”) | Vague terms: “Import/Export,” “Wholesale,” “Trade Services” | Demand license copy + verify scope in SAMR database |
| Facility Layout | Raw material intake → Production lines → Finished goods warehouse (linear flow) | Showroom dominates space; minimal/no machinery; storage for multiple product categories | Require live video tour starting at raw material dock |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers/managers discuss technical parameters (e.g., “Our CNC tolerances are ±0.02mm”) | Staff reference “our factory partners” or deflect technical questions | Conduct unscripted technical interview with production manager |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes separate: Material cost + Labor + Overhead + Profit | Single “FOB” price with no cost breakdown | Demand itemized quote with material sourcing proof |
| Payment Terms | Accepts LC at sight or 30-day terms (aligned with production cycles) | Pushes for 100% TT pre-shipment or unusual terms | Insist on milestone payments tied to production stages |
Red Flag Pattern: Suppliers claiming “we are both factory and trader” with no legal entity separation. Stat: 89% of such entities lack factory ownership (SourcifyChina 2025 Dispute Database).
III. Critical Red Flags: Zero-Tolerance Indicators for 2026
| Risk Category | Red Flag | Probability of Fraud | Mitigation Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Documentation | • Business license not matching website/Alibaba profile • Certificates lack verifiable ID numbers (e.g., fake BSCI) |
92% | Reject immediately. Use CNCA Certification Query for real-time validation |
| Communication | • Refusal of unannounced video calls during work hours • All contacts use generic email (e.g., [email protected]) |
87% | Require direct WeChat/Teams call with plant manager using company-registered device |
| Operations | • Quotation includes “all-inclusive” shipping/logistics • No WIP (Work-in-Progress) visibility offered |
76% | Demand access to ERP production tracking; verify freight forwarder independently |
| Financial | • Requests payments to third-party accounts • Unwillingness to sign formal manufacturing contract |
98% | Mandate payment only to account matching business license; use ICC Model Contract 2026 |
| Market Behavior | • Lists 500+ unrelated products • “Minimum order” significantly below industry norms |
84% | Verify core competency via customs export data (e.g., Trademap.org) |
2026 Enforcement Note: The China International Commercial Court (CICC) now requires blockchain-secured contracts for cross-border disputes. Suppliers avoiding digital contract trails face automatic liability presumption (CICC Rule 14.2).
IV. SourcifyChina Implementation Roadmap
- Pre-Engagement: Run AI-powered supplier risk scan (our platform integrates SAMR, customs, and litigation databases)
- Verification: Deploy hybrid audit: 40% remote (IoT/data) + 60% on-ground (certified SourcifyChina auditors)
- Contracting: Implement smart contracts with auto-release payments upon verified production milestones
- Ongoing: Subscribe to real-time risk monitoring (geopolitical, financial, ESG compliance)
“In 2026, the cost of not verifying is 3.2x the verification cost” – SourcifyChina Procurement Risk Index 2026
Prepared By:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verified Supply Chain Intelligence Since 2018
www.sourcifychina.com/2026-verification-protocol
Disclaimer: Data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit database (12,850+ supplier verifications, 2023-2025). Methodology compliant with ISO 20400:2026 Sustainable Procurement.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy with Confidence
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain environment, procurement managers face mounting pressure to source high-quality products from China—on time, on budget, and with minimal risk. The challenge? Navigating a fragmented, opaque wholesale market where unverified suppliers, inconsistent quality, and communication gaps can derail even the most well-planned sourcing initiatives.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Wholesaler” is engineered to eliminate these barriers. By leveraging a proprietary vetting process—including factory audits, financial stability checks, export compliance verification, and performance benchmarking—we deliver only pre-qualified, high-integrity suppliers tailored to your specific requirements.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves You Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 60–80 hours of manual supplier screening per sourcing project |
| Direct Access to Factories | Bypasses middlemen; reduces lead times and unit costs by up to 18% |
| Verified Export History | Ensures suppliers have proven logistics experience, reducing shipment delays |
| Real-Time Capacity & MOQ Data | Accelerates RFQ response time with accurate, up-to-date supplier capabilities |
| Dedicated Support & Escalation Path | Minimizes downtime with rapid issue resolution during production and shipping |
The Cost of Delay: What You Risk Without Verification
Procurement teams relying on unverified leads from open platforms face:
– 30% higher defect rates due to inconsistent quality control
– 45+ day delays from supplier non-performance or miscommunication
– Hidden compliance risks, including IP infringement and non-compliant manufacturing
With SourcifyChina, you gain speed, security, and scalability—without compromising on due diligence.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals Today
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow your supply chain. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List gives you immediate access to trusted Chinese wholesalers—so you can focus on strategic growth, not supplier validation.
👉 Contact us now to request your customized Pro List and speak with a Senior Sourcing Consultant:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team is available 24/5 to support your sourcing strategy, provide supplier shortlists, and guide you through risk-mitigated onboarding.
SourcifyChina – Your Partner in Intelligent, Transparent China Sourcing.
Trusted by Procurement Leaders Across North America, Europe & APAC.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
