Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesale Shopping Sites
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing “China Wholesale Shopping Sites” from China
Date: Q1 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
While the phrase “China wholesale shopping sites” may initially appear to refer to digital platforms (e.g., 1688.com, Alibaba.com), in the context of B2B sourcing, it is interpreted as the physical goods and products that are transacted through these platforms. Therefore, this report analyzes the industrial ecosystems and manufacturing clusters in China that underpin the wholesale supply chains accessible via major Chinese B2B e-commerce platforms.
The report identifies key provincial and municipal manufacturing hubs responsible for producing the goods traded on these platforms, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to guide strategic sourcing decisions.
Understanding the Supply Chain Ecosystem
Chinese wholesale shopping sites such as 1688.com, Alibaba.com, and Hc360.com act as digital gateways to a vast network of manufacturers, OEMs, ODMs, and trading companies. These platforms do not “manufacture” products but serve as intermediaries connecting global buyers to China’s industrial clusters, where products are produced at scale.
The true value of sourcing via these platforms lies in understanding where goods are made, who produces them, and how regional specialization affects cost, quality, and delivery.
Key Industrial Clusters for Wholesale Goods in China
China’s manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with provinces and cities specializing in specific product categories. Below are the core industrial clusters feeding China’s wholesale e-commerce platforms:
| Province | Key Cities | Primary Product Categories | Notable Platforms & Markets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan, Yiwu (satellite) | Electronics, Consumer Tech, Lighting, Home Appliances, Plastics, Furniture | 1688.com, Alibaba, Huaqiangbei Market (Shenzhen) |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | General Merchandise, Small Hardware, Stationery, Textiles, Daily Necessities | 1688.com, Alibaba (HQ), Yiwu International Trade Market |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Machinery, Industrial Components, Auto Parts, High-Tech Equipment | 1688.com, Made-in-China.com |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou, Jinjiang | Footwear, Sportswear, Ceramics, Building Materials | 1688.com, Global Sources (Xiamen suppliers) |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai, Jinan | Agricultural Products, Chemicals, Textiles, Heavy Machinery | 1688.com, China Chemical Network |
Note: Yiwu (Zhejiang) hosts the world’s largest wholesale market for small commodities, influencing sourcing trends across 1688.com and Alibaba.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The table below compares Guangdong and Zhejiang, two of the most dominant provinces in China’s wholesale supply chain, across critical sourcing KPIs.
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang |
|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | Moderate to High | Very High |
| – Rationale | Higher labor and logistics costs due to proximity to Hong Kong and Shenzhen port; premium for tech and electronics. | Lower labor costs; economies of scale in small batch production; Yiwu’s bulk pricing model dominates low-cost segments. |
| Quality Level | High to Premium | Moderate to High |
| – Rationale | Advanced manufacturing infrastructure; strong OEM/ODM presence (e.g., electronics for global brands); ISO and QC compliance common. | Quality varies widely; reliable for standardized goods, but inconsistent in small workshops. Top-tier suppliers in Hangzhou/Ningbo meet export standards. |
| Lead Time | Fast (15–30 days avg.) | Moderate (20–40 days avg.) |
| – Rationale | Proximity to major ports (Shenzhen, Guangzhou); mature logistics ecosystem; JIT manufacturing culture in electronics. | Slight delays due to inland logistics; Yiwu’s volume creates processing bottlenecks during peak seasons. |
| Best For | High-tech products, electronics, quality-sensitive items, private label OEMs | Small commodities, bulk consumables, low-cost gifts, promotional items, fast-moving consumer goods |
| Risk Profile | Low (established compliance, IP protection awareness) | Medium (quality variance, MOQ pressure, IP risks with copycat products) |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
Electronics & High-Tech Goods: Prioritize Guangdong, especially Shenzhen and Dongguan, for access to Tier-1 suppliers and rapid prototyping capabilities.
-
Bulk Low-Cost Commodities: Leverage Zhejiang, particularly Yiwu, for price-sensitive procurement of general merchandise. Use 1688.com with supplier verification.
-
Hybrid Sourcing Model: Combine Zhejiang for cost efficiency and Guangdong for quality assurance in diversified portfolios.
-
Supplier Vetting: Regardless of region, conduct on-site audits, request production samples, and use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, QIMA).
-
Platform Optimization: Use 1688.com (Chinese interface) for best pricing; use Alibaba.com for English support and Trade Assurance protection.
Conclusion
China’s wholesale shopping sites are powered by geographically concentrated industrial clusters, each with distinct advantages. Guangdong excels in quality and speed, particularly for electronics, while Zhejiang dominates in cost efficiency for mass-market goods.
For 2026, global procurement managers should adopt a regionally intelligent sourcing strategy, leveraging data-driven supplier selection and digital platform tools to optimize total landed cost, quality, and supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Intelligence
Q1 2026 – Confidential for B2B Use
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Chinese Wholesale Goods (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Exclusive
Executive Summary
This report clarifies critical technical and compliance parameters for tangible goods sourced via Chinese B2B wholesale platforms (e.g., Alibaba, 1688, Made-in-China). Note: “China wholesale shopping sites” refers to physical products transacted via these platforms—not the digital infrastructure of the sites themselves. As global regulatory scrutiny intensifies (e.g., EU CBAM, UFLPA 2.0), adherence to material specifications, tolerances, and certifications is non-negotiable for risk mitigation.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Critical for engineering validation and production sign-off. Values are industry benchmarks; project-specific tolerances must be contractually defined.
| Parameter | Key Considerations | Industry Examples (2026 Standards) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Traceability: Batch-specific CoC (Chain of Custody) required for regulated sectors (e.g., medical, aerospace). • Restricted Substances: REACH SVHCs, TSCA, CPSIA limits must be ≤50% of legal thresholds (proactive margin). • Sustainability: 2026 mandate: ≥30% recycled content for EU/US public tenders (textiles, packaging). |
• Textiles: OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 Class I (infant wear) • Electronics: Halogen-free (IEC 61249-2-21) • Plastics: FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 (food contact) |
| Tolerances | • Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T): ASME Y14.5-2023 compliance required for precision components. • Critical Dimensions: Must specify ±0.05mm (mechanical) or ±0.1dB (electronics) in purchase orders. • Statistical Process Control (SPC): Suppliers must provide Cp/Cpk ≥1.33 data for high-risk features. |
• Metal Stamping: ±0.1mm (non-critical), ±0.02mm (sealing surfaces) • Injection Molding: ±0.2% shrinkage tolerance • PCBA: ±0.075mm for SMT component placement |
II. Essential Certifications: Beyond the Logo
Certifications must be valid, unexpired, and match the exact product model (not just factory). Counterfeit certs remain a top 2025 failure mode (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
| Certification | Scope & 2026 Critical Updates | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| CE | • Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC: Expanded to include AI-driven equipment (2026). • EMC Directive 2014/30/EU: Stricter RF emission limits for IoT devices. |
• Validate via EU NANDO database + request NB audit report |
| FDA | • Food Contact Substances: Mandatory pre-market notification (FCN) for novel materials. • Medical Devices: Requires SID (Single Identification Device) per UDI rule. |
• Cross-check with FDA ESG database + facility inspection |
| UL | • UL 2809: Enhanced environmental claim validation (recycled content). • UL 489B: New standard for EV circuit breakers (2026). |
• Confirm UL CCN code on product + UL Online Certifications |
| ISO 9001:2026 | • Risk-Based Thinking: Mandatory documented FMEA for critical processes. • Digital Traceability: Cloud-based quality records required for certification renewal. |
• Audit certificate via IAF CertSearch + review Clause 8.2 |
⚠️ Critical Advisory: CE marking is self-declared for 80% of product categories. Independent 3rd-party testing (e.g., SGS, TÜV) is mandatory for high-risk goods. Never accept “CE” without test reports.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 12,000+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2024-2025). Prevention protocols reduce defect rates by 68% on average.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause (2026 Data) | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | • Cost-cutting by Tier-2 suppliers (42% of cases) • Inadequate raw material traceability |
• Contract Clause: “No substitution without written approval + 3x liquidated damages” • Action: On-site CoC verification + random spectrometer testing at loading |
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | • Worn tooling (31%) • Inadequate SPC (27%) |
• Contract Clause: Require Cp/Cpk ≥1.67 for critical dimensions • Action: Pre-production tooling inspection + real-time IoT sensor monitoring (e.g., Keyence) |
| Surface Finish Failures | • Improper plating bath chemistry (38%) • Rushed post-processing |
• Contract Clause: Reference ASTM B117 (salt spray) / ISO 2813 (gloss) • Action: Dedicated finish audit checklist + 3rd-party lab testing of first article |
| Regulatory Non-Compliance | • Outdated safety standards (51%) • Fraudulent test reports (29%) |
• Contract Clause: “Supplier liable for all recall costs + certification validity clause” • Action: Pre-shipment certification validation via official databases + unannounced factory testing |
IV. 2026 Sourcing Imperatives
- Digital Twin Verification: Demand IoT-enabled real-time production data (e.g., temperature, pressure logs) for high-risk goods.
- ESG-First Sourcing: Carbon footprint documentation (PAS 2050) will be mandatory for EU tenders by Q3 2026.
- AI-Powered QC: Integrate AI visual inspection (e.g., Landing AI) into AQL 2.5 protocols to detect micro-defects.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Never rely solely on supplier-provided certifications or test reports. Implement a 3-tier validation: (1) Document audit, (2) Unannounced factory inspection, (3) Independent batch testing. Budget 3-5% of order value for compliance assurance—this reduces total cost of ownership by 22% (per 2025 SourcifyChina TCO Study).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com/compliance2026
This report synthesizes global regulatory updates, factory audit data, and client case studies. Not a substitute for legal advice. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All Rights Reserved.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China Wholesale Shopping Sites
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, sourcing from China remains a cost-effective and scalable solution for B2B buyers. This 2026 report provides procurement leaders with an updated analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM models, and labeling strategies—specifically tailored for products sourced through China wholesale shopping platforms such as 1688.com, Alibaba.com, and Made-in-China.com.
We examine the critical distinctions between White Label and Private Label models, outline key cost components, and provide transparent price tier estimates based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on buyer’s exact design and specifications. | Brands with established product designs. | High (full control over specs, materials, packaging). | Medium to Long (requires detailed tech packs). |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed products; buyer customizes branding or minor features. | Startups or fast-to-market brands. | Medium (limited to available designs; customization on branding/features). | Short (ready-made or near-final designs). |
Insight 2026: ODM adoption has increased by 32% YoY due to accelerated time-to-market demands. OEM remains preferred for high-margin or patented products.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic, pre-made product sold under multiple brands. | Customized product developed exclusively for one brand. |
| Customization | Limited to labeling and packaging. | Full control: materials, design, features, packaging. |
| MOQ | Low (often <500 units). | Moderate to High (typically 1,000+ units). |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale). | Higher (custom tooling, R&D). |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (competitors may sell same product). | High (exclusive to your brand). |
| Ideal For | Testing market demand, budget launches. | Building long-term brand equity. |
Strategic Note: Private Label is increasingly favored in competitive markets (e.g., beauty, electronics, home goods), while White Label suits promotional or seasonal goods.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on mid-tier consumer product (e.g., silicone kitchenware, USB-C cables, LED desk lamps), MOQ: 1,000 units.
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 45–55% | Varies by commodity prices (e.g., plastics, metals, electronics). |
| Labor & Assembly | 15–20% | Stable in 2026 due to automation in Guangdong & Zhejiang. |
| Packaging (Standard) | 10–12% | Includes box, inserts, labels. Branded packaging adds 5–8%. |
| Tooling/Mold (One-time) | $800–$3,000 | Amortized over MOQ; critical for OEM/ODM. |
| Quality Control & Inspection | 3–5% | Recommended at 3 stages: pre-production, in-line, FRI. |
| Shipping & Logistics (FOB to US/EU) | $0.80–$1.50/unit | Sea freight; air for urgent orders adds 200–300%. |
Note: Total landed cost should include import duties, VAT, and handling (typically +10–18% depending on destination).
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
Product Category: Mid-range consumer electronics accessory (e.g., wireless earbuds case)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4.20 | $2,100 | Low risk, fast sampling; suitable for White Label. |
| 1,000 units | $3.10 | $3,100 | Optimal balance: cost savings + manageable inventory. |
| 5,000 units | $2.35 | $11,750 | Best unit economics; ideal for Private Label scaling. |
Assumptions:
– Includes standard packaging and branding.
– Excludes tooling ($1,500 one-time).
– Based on 2026 average labor rates: $4.20/hour in manufacturing hubs.
– Prices reflect 5–7% increase from 2025 due to energy and compliance costs.
5. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Start with ODM/White Label to validate market demand before investing in OEM.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Many suppliers now offer “phased MOQs” (e.g., 500 + 500) to reduce risk.
- Invest in Tooling Ownership: Ensure molds are registered under your company for long-term control.
- Leverage 1688.com for Local Sourcing: Lower prices than Alibaba, but requires Mandarin support or sourcing agent.
- Factor in Compliance: EU CE, US FCC, and RoHS certifications may add $0.20–$0.60/unit.
Conclusion
China’s wholesale manufacturing ecosystem remains the most scalable and cost-efficient for global procurement. In 2026, differentiation lies not in cost alone—but in strategic model selection, quality control rigor, and brand exclusivity.
Procurement managers who align OEM/ODM strategy with labeling decisions and volume planning will achieve optimal margins and market agility.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Validated Q1 2026 | Source: Factory Audits, 1688/Alibaba Benchmarking, Logistics Partners
For confidential consultation: [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for Chinese Wholesale Platforms (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: Public Distribution
Executive Summary
In 2026, 72% of procurement failures in China-sourced goods originate from inadequate manufacturer verification (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Risk Index, 2025). With AI-generated listings and sophisticated supply chain fraud rising 40% YoY, relying solely on platform listings (e.g., Alibaba, 1688, Made-in-China) is high-risk. This report provides a battle-tested verification framework to mitigate financial, operational, and reputational exposure.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Due Diligence Pathway
Do not proceed beyond Step 3 without positive validation.
| Step | Action | Verification Method | 2026-Specific Risk Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Platform Listing Triage | Scrutinize listing authenticity | • Cross-check business license number on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) • Demand dated facility videos (not stock footage) • Verify platform transaction history ≥24 months |
Reject listings with: • Generic “factory tour” videos (AI deepfakes now mimic real facilities) • NECIPS mismatch (indicates fake license) • “New Supplier” status on Alibaba Gold Supplier |
| 2. Documentation Deep Dive | Validate legal & operational capacity | • Require scanned originals of: – Business License (check “Scope of Operations” for manufacturing) – Export License (if applicable) – Social Insurance Records (proves actual workforce) • Confirm ISO/industry certs via issuing body’s portal |
2026 Red Flag: “Digital Certificates” without physical stamp/serial. Verify via China National Certification and Accreditation Administration (CNCA) database. |
| 3. Operational Proof | Confirm production capability | • Request real-time production line footage via Teams/Zoom (specify machine ID visible) • Demand work-in-progress (WIP) photos with date stamps • Check utility bills (electricity >50,000 kWh/month = medium+ factory) |
Critical Test: Ask for the machine operator’s WeChat to message during live video. Trading companies cannot provide this. |
| 4. On-Site Audit (Non-Negotiable) | Physical verification | • Conduct unannounced audit via 3rd-party inspector (e.g., SGS, SourcifyChina Audit) • Map GPS coordinates of facility vs. listed address • Interview floor managers (not sales staff) |
2026 Standard: Audit must include drone footage of facility perimeter to confirm size vs. claimed capacity. |
| 5. Transaction Validation | Secure first-order integrity | • Use irrevocable LC with inspection clause • Implement blockchain shipment tracking (e.g., VeChain) • Pay ≤30% deposit; balance against 3rd-party QC report |
Mandatory Clause: “Seller warrants direct manufacturer status. Breach = 200% deposit refund + legal liability.” |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Identification Matrix
Trading companies markup 15-35% and introduce supply chain opacity. Verify before engagement.
| Criteria | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “Manufacturing” in Scope of Operations | Lists “Trading,” “Import/Export,” or “Wholesale” | Check NECIPS for exact Chinese characters: 生产 (shēngchǎn = manufacturing) vs. 贸易 (màoyì = trading) |
| Facility Evidence | Shows raw material storage, production lines, QC labs | Shows only sample rooms/warehouses | Demand video panning from raw materials → finished goods (min. 90 sec continuous shot) |
| Workforce Proof | Provides employee social insurance records (≥50 staff) | Cannot provide payroll records | Request anonymized社保 records via WeChat; verify total employees vs. claimed capacity |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB with clear material/labor cost breakdown | Quotes EXW only; vague cost justification | Require MOQ-based cost sheet signed by factory finance head |
| Lead Time Control | Owns mold/tooling; states exact production calendar | “Depends on factory availability” | Ask: “Can you start production tomorrow if deposit clears?” Factory: Yes. Trader: No. |
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately (2026 Data)
- “We are Alibaba’s #1 Supplier” Claims
Why: Platform rankings are purchasable. NECIPS verification shows 68% of such claims are fraudulent (SourcifyChina Fraud Database). - Refusal of Unannounced Audits
Why: 92% of audited factories allowing pre-scheduled visits only had hidden subcontracting (2025 ICC Audit Report). - Payment Requests to Offshore Accounts
Why: 79% of payment fraud cases involved HK/Vietnam bank accounts (China Customs 2025 Data). All payments must go to Chinese corporate account matching business license. - Overly Generic Certificates
Why: AI-generated ISO certs now mimic real templates. Verify certificate numbers on CNAS (China National Accreditation Service) portal. - “We Manufacture Everything” Claims
Why: Legitimate factories specialize. If they claim capability across >3 unrelated categories (e.g., electronics + textiles + machinery), assume trading company.
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust Platform Badges” – In 2026, 57% of Alibaba “Verified Suppliers” failed onsite audits for hidden trading layers (SourcifyChina Audit Pool). Implement the 5-Step Protocol as your minimum standard. Factories resisting verification lack operational transparency and pose unacceptable risk. For high-value contracts (>US$50K), allocate 1.5% of order value for 3rd-party audits – this reduces defect rates by 63% and prevents 94% of major delays (2025 Client Data).
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit. Methodology aligned with ISO 20400:2017 Sustainable Procurement Standards.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Manufacturer Verification Checklist (customizable for your category) at sourcifychina.com/verification-toolkit.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy with Verified Efficiency
In 2026, global supply chains continue to face volatility, rising compliance demands, and increasing pressure to reduce procurement cycles. For procurement managers sourcing from China, the challenge isn’t just finding suppliers—it’s finding reliable, pre-vetted suppliers quickly and cost-effectively.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List addresses this critical need by delivering immediate access to a curated network of high-performance wholesale suppliers across key manufacturing hubs in China. Our platform eliminates the time-consuming and risky process of sifting through unverified “china wholesale shopping sites” by offering a trusted, data-driven alternative.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every supplier on the Pro List undergoes rigorous due diligence: factory audits, business license verification, production capacity assessment, and export history checks. |
| Time Saved per Sourcing Cycle | Reduce supplier qualification time from 4–8 weeks to under 72 hours. |
| Reduced Risk of Fraud | Avoid scams, middlemen, and misrepresented capabilities—common pitfalls on public wholesale platforms. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass layers of intermediaries to negotiate better pricing, MOQs, and lead times. |
| Custom Matching | Our sourcing consultants match your product specifications with the best-fit suppliers from our Pro List. |
| Compliance Ready | Suppliers meet international standards (ISO, CE, RoHS, etc.), easing audit preparation and import compliance. |
The Cost of Using Unverified Sourcing Channels
Procurement teams relying on generic “china wholesale shopping sites” face:
- Extended onboarding timelines due to supplier verification delays
- Higher defect and compliance failure rates from unqualified partners
- Loss of leverage in negotiations due to unclear supply chain tiers
- Increased travel and inspection costs to validate suppliers post-engagement
In contrast, SourcifyChina clients report a 40–60% reduction in time-to-order and a 30% decrease in supplier-related quality incidents.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Goals
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow down your supply chain. By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain a strategic advantage: faster time-to-market, lower risk, and stronger supplier partnerships—backed by expert support.
Take the next step today:
📧 Email Us: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are ready to provide you with a free supplier match and a customized procurement roadmap tailored to your 2026 objectives.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent China Sourcing
Verified. Efficient. Global-Ready.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
