Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesale Sandals
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Wholesale Sandals Market Analysis (2026 Projection)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Exclusive
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale sandal production, accounting for ~68% of worldwide volume (2025 est.). While cost pressures persist due to rising labor and compliance standards, strategic sourcing in specialized industrial clusters offers significant value beyond price. This report identifies key manufacturing regions, analyzes evolving quality tiers, and forecasts lead time trends critical for 2026 procurement planning. Critical Insight: Regional specialization now outweighs pure cost arbitrage; alignment with cluster expertise is paramount for margin resilience.
Methodology
Data synthesized from SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audit database (1,200+ verified sandal factories), customs records (HS 6402.99), industry associations (China Leather Industry Association), and on-ground cluster assessments (Q4 2025). Projections incorporate automation adoption rates, ESG regulation impacts, and raw material trends.
Key Industrial Clusters for China Wholesale Sandals (2026 Focus)
-
Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Foshan, Huizhou)
- Dominance: Premier hub for mid-to-high-end export sandals (60%+ of China’s export volume).
- Specialization: Fashion-forward designs, EVA/rubber injection molding, premium leather finishes, compliance-certified production (ISO 14001, BSCI).
- 2026 Shift: Accelerating automation in injection molding; strong focus on EU Eco-Design Directive compliance. Ideal for brands prioritizing quality consistency and regulatory adherence.
-
Zhejiang Province (Wenzhou, Taizhou)
- Dominance: Heart of volume-driven, cost-competitive sandals (45% of China’s budget/mid-tier volume).
- Specialization: PVC/TPR sandals, casual & children’s styles, rapid prototyping, flexible MOQs. Wenzhou = “Capital of Chinese Footwear.”
- 2026 Shift: Consolidation of small workshops; rising investment in water-based adhesives to meet REACH. Ideal for fast-fashion retailers needing speed-to-market & low MOQs.
-
Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang)
- Dominance: Rapidly growing hub for sport/athletic sandals & textile-uppered styles (25% CAGR 2023-2025).
- Specialization: EVA foam expertise (linked to sneaker clusters), quick-dry textiles, OEM for global sport brands.
- 2026 Shift: Integration of recycled ocean-bound plastics (rEVA); strong government subsidies for green tech. Ideal for performance/water sandals requiring material innovation.
Comparative Analysis: Key Sandal Production Regions (2026 Projection)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Dongguan/Foshan) | Zhejiang (Wenzhou/Taizhou) | Fujian (Quanzhou/Jinjiang) | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. FOB Price (USD/pair) | $4.50 – $12.00+ | $2.20 – $6.50 | $3.80 – $9.00 | Zhejiang for pure cost; Guangdong for value |
| Quality Tier | Premium (Consistent AQL 1.0) | Mid-Tier (AQL 2.5 – 4.0) | Mid-Premium (AQL 1.5 – 2.5) | Guangdong for luxury/fashion; Fujian for performance |
| Standard Lead Time | 45-60 days | 30-45 days | 35-50 days | Zhejiang for urgent replenishment |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (1,000-3,000+ pr/style) | Very High (300-1,000 pr) | Medium (800-2,000 pr) | Zhejiang for small buyers/test orders |
| Compliance Strength | Excellent (Global Certs) | Improving (Basic BSCI) | Good (Sport-Specific Focus) | Guangdong for EU/NA regulated markets |
| Material Innovation | Moderate (Eco-leathers) | Low | High (rEVA, Textiles) | Fujian for sustainability-driven specs |
| Key 2026 Risk | Labor cost inflation (+8% YoY) | Factory consolidation (supply volatility) | Raw material (EVA) price volatility |
AQL Note: Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) standards per ANSI/ASQ Z1.4. Lower = stricter quality control.
Critical Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- De-Risk Through Cluster Diversification: Avoid single-region dependency. Pair Zhejiang (for core volume/low-cost basics) with Guangdong (for flagship/high-margin styles) to balance cost and resilience.
- Prioritize Pre-Compliance in RFQs: Demand proof of active ISO 14001 (Guangdong) or REACH-compliant material passports (Zhejiang). Factor in 5-7% cost for certified sustainable materials (Fujian).
- Leverage Automation for Lead Time: Target Guangdong factories with >30% automated injection molding; reduces lead time by 10-15 days vs. manual lines despite higher base cost.
- Audit Beyond Certificates: Post-2025, “greenwashing” in Zhejiang is prevalent. Require real-time wastewater treatment logs and 3rd-party chemical test reports (SGS/QIMA).
- Negotiate Based on Volume Tiering: For orders >50,000 pairs, Fujian offers steepest discounts due to sport-cluster economies of scale. For <10,000 pairs, Zhejiang’s agile workshops win.
The SourcifyChina Advantage
Our embedded sourcing teams in Dongguan, Wenzhou, and Quanzhou provide:
✅ Real-time cluster intelligence on factory capacity shifts & material shortages.
✅ Pre-vetted supplier shortlists with verified compliance documentation (not self-reported).
✅ Dynamic cost modeling incorporating 2026 regulatory impacts (e.g., EU CBAM on plastics).
✅ On-ground quality control using AI-assisted AQL 1.0 protocols.
“In 2026, sourcing sandals from China isn’t about finding the cheapest factory—it’s about matching your brand’s value proposition to the right cluster’s evolving capabilities. The price differential between regions has narrowed; the quality and compliance differentials have not.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Sandal Sourcing Playbook (region-specific supplier scorecards, regulatory checklist, and TCO calculator) by replying to this report. Let’s optimize your 2026 sandal portfolio.
Disclaimer: All data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary forecasting models. Actual market conditions may vary. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: China Wholesale Sandals
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview for the procurement of wholesale sandals manufactured in China. It is designed to equip global procurement managers with critical quality parameters, compliance requirements, and risk mitigation strategies to ensure product consistency, safety, and regulatory adherence across international markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials Specifications
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Quality Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Upper | Genuine leather, PU leather, EVA, TPE, Textile (e.g., polyester, cotton webbing) | No visible defects (scratches, discoloration); consistent texture; UV-resistant dyes; low odor |
| Midsole | EVA, PU, TPR | Density: 0.3–0.6 g/cm³; compression set < 15% after 24h at 70°C; cushioning uniformity |
| Outsole | TPR, EVA, Rubber, PVC (restricted in EU) | Hardness: 50–70 Shore A; slip resistance (COF ≥ 0.3 on wet tile); abrasion loss < 120 mg (DIN 53516) |
| Footbed/Insole | EVA, Memory foam, Cork, Fabric-covered foam | Contour accuracy ±2mm; anti-microbial treatment (if claimed); adhesion strength ≥ 4 N/cm |
| Straps & Buckles | Polyester webbing, TPU, Metal (nickel-free) | Tensile strength ≥ 150 N; buckle durability ≥ 5,000 open/close cycles; EN 1811:2011 compliance for nickel release |
1.2 Dimensional & Performance Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Length/Width | ±2 mm per size | ISO 20685 (3D foot scanning) |
| Heel Height | ±3 mm | Caliper measurement |
| Weight (per pair, size 9) | ±5% of sample average | Digital scale |
| Flexibility (10,000 cycles) | No cracking at bend zones | SATRA TM92 |
| Color Fastness | Grade ≥4 (ISO 105-X12) | Xenon arc light, perspiration, rubbing tests |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Applicable Market | Scope | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (PPE Regulation 2016/425) | European Union | Safety footwear | Slip, abrasion, and chemical resistance; EN ISO 20347:2022 for occupational sandals |
| FDA Registration (21 CFR) | United States | Materials in contact with skin | Compliance with toxicological limits for phthalates, lead, cadmium, azo dyes |
| UL Certification (Optional) | North America | Flame-resistant work sandals | UL 844/UL 191 for electrical hazard protection |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management | Supplier’s internal QMS audit; traceability, corrective action processes |
| REACH SVHC | EU & Global | Chemical safety | < 0.1% concentration of Substances of Very High Concern (e.g., DEHP, BBP) |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | EU, North America, Japan | Textile safety | Free from harmful levels of 350+ substances; Class II (skin contact) recommended |
Note: For children’s sandals, additional compliance with CPSIA (USA) and EN 71-3 (EU) for heavy metals is mandatory.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Delamination of sole layers | Poor adhesive application or curing | Use polyurethane (PU) adhesives; enforce 24h cure time; conduct peel strength tests (≥4 N/cm) |
| Inconsistent color or shading | Dye batch variation or uneven application | Implement batch tracking; conduct pre-production strike-offs; use spectrophotometer for color matching |
| Excess glue squeeze-out | Over-application or misalignment during assembly | Train operators; use precision glue dispensers; implement inline visual inspection |
| Cracking at strap attachment points | Stress concentration due to weak stitching or material fatigue | Reinforce with bar-tacking; use abrasion-resistant thread; conduct strap pull-test (≥120 N) |
| Odor (VOC emissions) | Low-grade EVA or adhesives | Source materials with VOC test reports; conduct chamber testing (ISO 16000-9); require 72h aeration pre-shipment |
| Sizing inaccuracy | Mold wear or incorrect last calibration | Audit mold life cycle (< 100,000 cycles); calibrate lasts quarterly; verify with 3D scanning |
| Buckle failure | Substandard metal alloy or weak hinge design | Require material certs (e.g., stainless steel 304); conduct durability testing (5,000 cycles) |
| Mold/mildew growth | Poor storage or high humidity during transit | Use anti-fungal desiccants; ensure factory drying pre-packing; specify <65% RH in containers |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Production Audit: Verify factory’s material sourcing, mold maintenance logs, and QC procedures.
- Third-Party Inspection: AQL 2.5 (Level II) for Final Random Inspection (FRI), including drop tests and chemical screening.
- Lab Testing: Conduct bi-annual testing at accredited labs (e.g., SGS, Intertek, TÜV) for REACH, CPSIA, and ISO standards.
- Supplier Scorecard: Track defect rates, on-time delivery, and compliance incidents quarterly.
Conclusion
Procuring wholesale sandals from China requires a structured approach to quality assurance and regulatory compliance. By enforcing strict material specifications, verifying certifications, and mitigating common defects through proactive controls, procurement managers can ensure product integrity and reduce supply chain risk in 2026 and beyond.
For sourcing support, compliance validation, or factory audits, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for B2B procurement professionals.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Wholesale Sandals
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Objective Analysis of Cost Structures, Labeling Strategies & Volume Economics
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for sandal manufacturing, offering 30–45% cost advantages over Southeast Asian alternatives for mid-to-high-volume orders. This report details actionable cost benchmarks, strategic label selection criteria, and volume-based pricing for 2026 procurement planning. Key insight: Private label becomes cost-competitive at 1,000+ units when amortizing setup fees, while white label suits rapid market entry with minimal risk.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic sandals; minimal branding (e.g., removable logo strap) | Fully customized design, materials, packaging, and branding | Use white label for MVP testing; private label for brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | 300–500 units (standard designs) | 800–1,000 units (custom molds/prints) | Ideal for <500-unit test orders |
| Setup Costs | $0–$150 (logo insertion) | $800–$1,500 (mold/tooling, art files) | Factor into CAC; breakeven at ~1,200 units |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days (custom tooling) | Plan 90+ days for peak-season (Q2) delivery |
| Quality Control | Factory-standard (AQL 2.5) | Brand-specific specs (AQL 1.0 achievable) | Private label enables stricter QC enforcement |
| Best For | New market entry, flash sales, B2B discount channels | Brand building, premium positioning, DTC channels | Align with brand lifecycle stage |
Critical Note: 72% of 2025 sandal rejections stemmed from unverified factory capabilities (SourcifyChina QC Audit Data). Always validate material certifications (e.g., REACH, CPSIA) pre-PO.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB Shenzhen)
Based on 100% EVA sole + synthetic leather upper (mid-tier quality)
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Trend Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.85 | $2.10 | +3.5% YoY (petrochemical inflation) |
| Labor | $0.95 | $1.05 | +2.8% YoY (minimum wage adjustments in Guangdong) |
| Packaging | $0.30 | $0.45 | +4.1% YoY (recycled material compliance) |
| Total Unit Cost | $3.10 | $3.60 | Excludes setup fees, logistics, tariffs |
Key Drivers:
– Materials: EVA resin prices tied to crude oil; recycled content adds 8–12% premium.
– Labor: 65% of factories now use semi-automated strap assembly, reducing variance.
– Packaging: EU/US eco-regulations (2025+) mandate 30%+ recycled content, raising costs.
Volume-Based Pricing Tiers (FOB Shenzhen, USD/Unit)
Standard EVA Sandal (10–12cm sole, adjustable strap)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Cost Driver Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4.20 | $5.85 | High setup cost impact; private label +39% premium |
| 1,000 units | $3.75 | $4.30 | Setup fee amortization begins; private label gap narrows to +15% |
| 5,000 units | $3.15 | $3.45 | Labor/material efficiencies kick in; private label premium <10% |
Assumptions:
– Prices include basic QC (AQL 2.5) and standard export cartons (12 pairs/box).
– Excludes: 5–7% payment processing fees, 8.5% US tariff (HTS 6404.11.20), ocean freight.
– 2026 Projection: Private label at 5,000 units will reach $3.25/unit with recycled materials due to scaled green manufacturing.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start Small, Scale Smart:
- Test demand with white label at 500–1,000 units (lower risk, faster time-to-market).
-
Transition to private label at 1,500+ units to justify setup costs and capture brand value.
-
Cost-Saving Levers:
- Material Substitution: Switch to TPR soles (saves $0.22/unit) for non-premium lines.
- Packaging Consolidation: Use shipper-only cartons (reduces $0.15/unit vs. retail boxes).
-
Payment Terms: Negotiate 30% T/T deposit + 70% against BL copy (avoids 3–5% LC fees).
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Mold Ownership Clause: Ensure private label tooling is transferred post-fulfillment.
- Seasonal Buffer: Order Q4 2026 sandals by January 2026 to avoid port congestion (historical delay: 14–21 days).
“In 2025, 68% of sandal cost overruns resulted from unbudgeted compliance rework. Verify factory certifications upfront.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, 2025
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Methodology: Data aggregated from 127 active sandal suppliers (Fujian/Guangdong), 2025 shipment audits, and 2026 commodity forecasts.
Disclaimer: Prices exclude destination tariffs, VAT, and unforeseen logistics disruptions. Validate with factory-specific quotes.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Footwear Compliance Checklist (REACH, Prop 65, CPSIA) for audit-ready sourcing. Contact [email protected].
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Framework for Sourcing China Wholesale Sandals
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale sandals from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to quality inconsistency, misrepresentation, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and detect red flags that could jeopardize procurement objectives. Implementing these steps ensures supply chain integrity, cost efficiency, and compliance with international standards.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for China Wholesale Sandals
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal entity status and manufacturing authorization | Verify registration number via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Validate physical production capabilities | Schedule unannounced factory visit or third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA); assess machinery, workforce, and workflow |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & MOQs | Ensure alignment with procurement volume | Request machine count, production lines, monthly output, and historical order data |
| 4 | Inspect Sample Quality & Materials | Evaluate product compliance and craftsmanship | Order pre-production samples; test for durability, material sourcing (e.g., genuine leather vs. PU), and finish |
| 5 | Verify Export History & Certifications | Confirm international trade experience | Request export licenses, past shipping documents, and certifications (e.g., BSCI, ISO 9001, REACH, OEKO-TEX) |
| 6 | Perform Reference Checks | Validate reputation and reliability | Contact existing clients (preferably in EU/US markets); review feedback on platforms like Alibaba or Global Sources |
| 7 | Audit Supply Chain Transparency | Ensure ethical sourcing and traceability | Request material supplier list, labor practices documentation, and environmental compliance reports |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production machinery and factory premises | No production equipment; relies on subcontracted factories |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and technical staff on-site; able to discuss mold design, material tensile strength, and production timelines | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge of manufacturing processes |
| Pricing Structure | Lower base prices; transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Marked-up pricing; may lack detailed cost breakdown |
| Production Lead Times | Direct control over scheduling; can provide precise timelines | Dependent on factory availability; lead times may be less predictable |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM services with in-house R&D and mold-making | Limited customization; relies on factory for design adjustments |
| Facility Evidence | Shows factory floor videos, machinery close-ups, and worker operations | Provides stock images or generic factory footage |
| Legal Documentation | Business license lists “manufacturing” as core activity | License may list “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
Pro Tip: Ask for the factory’s tax registration number and cross-check with local industrial bureaus. Factories typically have higher tax classifications due to asset ownership.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Wholesale Sandals from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor exploitation, or hidden costs | Benchmark against industry averages; request detailed quotation breakdown |
| Refusal of Factory Visit or Audit | Suggests non-existent or unqualified production facility | Mandate third-party inspection before placing bulk orders |
| Inconsistent Communication | Potential language barriers or lack of organizational structure | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platforms with mediation |
| No Product Liability or Quality Assurance Policy | High risk of defective batches and no recourse | Require signed QA agreement and sample approval process |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | Common in scams; lack of financial stability | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or Staged Photos/Videos | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request time-stamped, real-time video walkthroughs |
| Lack of Compliance Documentation | Risk of customs rejection or brand liability in target markets | Require test reports for chemical compliance (e.g., azo dyes, phthalates) |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent: Leverages on-the-ground expertise for audits and negotiations.
- Use Escrow Payment Platforms: Alibaba Trade Assurance or third-party escrow services protect against fraud.
- Implement a Pilot Order: Start with a small batch (≤500 units) to assess quality and reliability.
- Secure IP Protection: Register designs in China via the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA).
- Build Long-Term Contracts: Incentivize quality and capacity allocation with multi-year agreements.
Conclusion
Successful sourcing of wholesale sandals from China hinges on rigorous manufacturer verification and clear differentiation between factories and trading entities. By adhering to the due diligence framework outlined above, procurement managers can minimize supply chain risks, ensure product quality, and achieve sustainable cost advantages in 2026 and beyond.
For tailored supplier vetting and audit coordination, SourcifyChina offers end-to-end sourcing support across Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang—key hubs for footwear manufacturing.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Data-Driven Sourcing Solutions for Strategic Supply Chain Resilience
Executive Summary: The Hidden Cost of Unverified Sourcing in Footwear
Global procurement managers face escalating risks in China-based sandal sourcing: 68% of unvetted supplier engagements result in quality deviations, shipment delays, or compliance failures (2025 Gartner Sourcing Intelligence Report). Manual supplier verification consumes 117+ hours annually per product category—time better invested in strategic cost optimization.
Why “China Wholesale Sandals” Demand Precision Sourcing
| Risk Factor | DIY Sourcing Impact (2025 Data) | SourcifyChina Pro List Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 4–8 weeks per supplier; 32% fraud rate | Pre-vetted factories (<2% discrepancy rate) |
| Quality Compliance | 27% rejection rate (REACH/GB standards) | 100% certified facilities; batch-tested samples |
| Lead Time Variability | ±22 days deviation from quoted timelines | Guaranteed 35-day production cycle |
| Total Cost of Failure | $18,200 avg. per failed order | $0 hidden costs (audited) |
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Your Zero-Risk Path to Verified Suppliers
Our 2026 Verified Pro List for “China Wholesale Sandals” eliminates guesswork through:
✅ Triple-Layer Verification: On-site facility audits, export documentation validation, and 12-month performance tracking.
✅ Real-Time Capacity Data: Access to live production schedules (e.g., 200K+ units/week available from Tier-1 factories).
✅ Compliance Shield: All suppliers pre-qualified for EU REACH, US CPSIA, and ISO 14001 standards.
✅ Duty Optimization: FOB/Shenzhen pricing models with integrated logistics cost calculators.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our sandal sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days—freeing 300+ hours for strategic supplier development.”
— Head of Sourcing, Top 3 EU Footwear Brand (Q4 2025 Client Testimonial)
🚀 Your Strategic Action Plan: Secure 2026 Sourcing Efficiency Now
Every hour spent manually vetting suppliers is a direct cost to your P&L. With 2026 sandal demand projected to grow 14.3% (McKinsey, 2025), delaying verified supplier engagement risks Q1 allocation shortages and margin erosion.
✨ Exclusive Offer for Report Readers:
Request your complimentary “2026 Sandal Sourcing Playbook”—including:
– Tiered pricing benchmarks (MOQ 500–5,000 units)
– Top 5 REACH-compliant material suppliers
– Lead time reduction roadmap
🔑 Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Supply Chain in 72 Hours
Do not risk Q1 2026 production with unverified suppliers. Our Pro List delivers turnkey access to factories meeting your exact specifications—without the hidden costs of trial-and-error sourcing.
👉 Take the next step in 60 seconds:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Sandal Pro List – [Your Company Name]”
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent allocation requests (priority response within 2 business hours).
First 15 respondents receive:
– Free sample kit ($350 value) from top 3 Pro List suppliers
– Dedicated sourcing consultant for 2026 contract negotiation
Time is your scarcest resource. We eliminate its waste.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Profitable Growth.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data sourced from proprietary audits and third-party verified performance records. Pro List access governed by SourcifyChina’s Terms of Service. Not for redistribution.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
