Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesale Bedding Sets
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Wholesale Bedding Sets Market Analysis (2026 Outlook)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2025
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of wholesale bedding sets, accounting for ~68% of global export volume (China Textile Industry Association, 2025). Post-pandemic consolidation and automation investments have elevated quality standards, though rising labor costs and ESG compliance demands necessitate strategic regional selection. Jiangsu Province (Nantong) is the undisputed epicenter for integrated bedding production, while Zhejiang (Shaoxing) excels in printed textiles. Critical Note: Guangdong is not a primary bedding manufacturing hub; its role is limited to design/export coordination for electronics-apparel hybrids (e.g., smart bedding). Misallocating RFQs to Guangdong risks 20-30% cost inefficiency.
Key Industrial Clusters: Bedding Set Manufacturing
China’s bedding production is hyper-concentrated in three core clusters, each with distinct value propositions:
| Region | Core City(s) | Specialization | Market Share | Key OEM Clients |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu Province | Nantong | Full-service bedding sets (cotton, microfiber, linen); OEM/ODM for global retailers; integrated supply chain (yarn → finished product) | 42% of national output | IKEA, Target, Bed Bath & Beyond, Amazon Basics |
| Zhejiang Province | Shaoxing | High-volume printed fabrics (digital/sublimation); pillowcases/sheet sets; cost-sensitive mid-tier products | 31% of national output | Wayfair, SHEIN Home, regional European brands |
| Shandong Province | Qingdao | Premium organic cotton/linen; eco-certified production; smaller batch flexibility | 15% of national output | Crate & Barrel, Brooklinen, Eileen Fisher |
Why Not Guangdong? Guangdong (Shenzhen, Guangzhou) focuses on electronics, apparel, and home textiles with tech integration (e.g., heated bedding). Traditional cotton/microfiber bedding sets are not manufactured at scale here. Sourcing requests misdirected to Guangdong typically yield brokers—not factories—adding 15-25% margins.
Regional Comparison: Critical Sourcing Metrics (2026 Projections)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audit database (n=127 facilities) and client shipment analytics.
| Parameter | Jiangsu (Nantong) | Zhejiang (Shaoxing) | Shandong (Qingdao) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/set) | $8.50–$14.20 (3-pc cotton) | $6.80–$11.50 (3-pc microfiber) | $12.00–$22.50 (3-pc organic cotton) |
| Trend (2026) | +3.5% YoY (automation offsets labor costs) | +4.2% YoY (energy cost pressure) | +2.8% YoY (stable due to premium positioning) |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ (Consistent AQL 1.0–1.5; strict ISO 9001) | ★★★☆☆ (AQL 1.5–2.5; variable dye lot control) | ★★★★★ (AQL 0.65–1.0; GOTS/OEKO-TEX certified) |
| Lead Time | 35–45 days (integrated mills; low MOQ 500 sets) | 40–55 days (fabric sourcing delays; MOQ 1,000+) | 50–65 days (smaller batches; MOQ 300 sets) |
| Key Strengths | End-to-end control, scalability, quality consistency | Ultra-low cost for printed designs, high-volume capacity | Sustainability compliance, artisanal craftsmanship |
| Key Risks | Rising wage pressure (Jiangsu min. wage: +8.1% YoY) | Water pollution regulations (Zhejiang crackdown) | Limited capacity for mass-market volumes |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Sourcing
- Prioritize Nantong, Jiangsu for Core Volumes: Optimize total cost (not unit price) via reduced logistics complexity and quality assurance. Action: Target factories with vertically integrated operations (e.g., Jiangsu Hengli Group, Nantong Yaxing Textile).
- Use Shaoxing, Zhejiang Selectively: Only for high-volume, design-led microfiber sets where print cost is <35% of BOM. Avoid for solid-color or premium cotton.
- Audit ESG Compliance Proactively: 73% of EU/US buyers now mandate SCS Global Services or Higg FEM 3.0 certifications. Jiangsu leads in certified facilities (68% vs. Zhejiang’s 41%).
- Mitigate Reshoring Risk: Diversify 15-20% of volume to Qingdao-based eco-factories to hedge against potential tariffs on non-sustainable goods under EU CBAM 2.0 (2026).
SourcifyChina Insight: The “lowest price” strategy is obsolete. By 2026, total landed cost + compliance risk will dictate sourcing success. Factories in Nantong with automated cutting/sewing lines (e.g., robotic embroidery) now match Vietnam on cost for orders >5,000 sets—without supply chain fragmentation.
The SourcifyChina Advantage
We de-risk China sourcing via:
✅ Cluster-Specific Vetting: 127+ pre-qualified bedding factories across Jiangsu/Zhejiang/Shandong (2025 audit data).
✅ Real-Time Cost Modeling: Dynamic pricing tool adjusting for regional wage shifts, energy costs, and compliance premiums.
✅ ESG Integration: Full audit of factory certifications (GOTS, BCI, WRAP) pre-RFQ.
Request our 2026 Bedding Sourcing Playbook: Includes MOQ benchmarks, top 10 factory shortlists, and tariff impact scenarios.
SourcifyChina | Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing Since 2010
Data-Driven. Risk-Aware. Borderless.
www.sourcifychina.com/procurment-resources | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance for China Wholesale Bedding Sets
1. Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of the technical, quality, and compliance requirements for sourcing wholesale bedding sets from manufacturers in China. Intended for procurement professionals managing large-volume textile acquisitions, this guide outlines key material specifications, tolerance standards, mandatory and recommended certifications, and a structured analysis of common quality defects with prevention strategies.
Adherence to these parameters ensures product consistency, regulatory compliance in target markets (EU, US, CA, AU), and reduced risk of shipment rejections or post-market recalls.
2. Key Quality Parameters
2.1 Material Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric Type | 100% Cotton, Cotton-Polyester Blend (e.g., 50/50 or 65/35), Bamboo, Microfiber | 100% cotton preferred for premium segment |
| Thread Count | 180–600 TC (Typical: 300–400 TC for mid-to-high range) | Measured per square inch; verify via lab test |
| Fabric Weight (GSM) | 120–180 g/m² (Sheets); 200–350 g/m² (Duvet Covers) | Higher GSM = heavier, more durable fabric |
| Dyeing Process | Azo-free dyes, low-impact reactive or pigment dyes | Must comply with REACH, OEKO-TEX® |
| Seam Construction | Minimum 8–12 stitches per inch (SPI); double-stitched seams on stress points | Prevents seam slippage |
| Elastic Band Width | 25–40 mm (Fitted Sheets) | Even distribution, secure attachment |
2.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Product Type | Dimension | Allowable Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| Flat Sheet | Length / Width | ±1.5 cm |
| Fitted Sheet | Length / Width / Depth | ±1.0 cm |
| Duvet Cover | Length / Width | ±1.5 cm |
| Pillowcase | Length / Width | ±0.8 cm |
| Elastic Fit | Corner Elastic Tension | ±10% of rated strength |
Note: Tolerances must be verified during Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI) using calibrated measuring tools.
3. Essential Certifications
Procurement teams must ensure suppliers hold valid, traceable certifications. Below are key requirements based on destination market:
| Certification | Applicable Market | Scope | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Global (EU, US, CA, JP, AU) | Toxicological testing for harmful substances (e.g., formaldehyde, heavy metals, pesticides) | Class I (for baby articles) recommended for all bedding |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | European Union | Restriction of hazardous chemicals | Mandatory for EU market access |
| CA Prop 65 (California) | USA | Carcinogens and reproductive toxins | Required for US West Coast distribution |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management System | Indicates process control and consistency |
| BSCI / Sedex (SMETA) | EU & Ethical Retailers | Social compliance (labor, working conditions) | Increasingly required by major retailers |
| FSC or PEFC (for packaging) | EU, NA | Sustainable forestry | Applies if paper-based packaging used |
Note: UL, FDA, and CE are not typically applicable to standard textile bedding sets.
– UL applies to electrical or fire-retardant treated textiles (e.g., heated blankets).
– FDA regulates medical textiles, not consumer bedding.
– CE marking is not required for general bedding unless marketed as medical or flame-resistant.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Bleeding / Fading | Poor dye fixation, inadequate wash fastness | Enforce AATCC Test Method 61 (Colorfastness to Laundering); require pre-washing; verify OEKO-TEX® certification |
| Shrinkage >5% | Inadequate pre-shrinking of fabric | Specify maximum 3–4% shrinkage (AATCC Test Method 135); audit pre-treatment processes |
| Seam Slippage / Puckering | Low stitch count, poor tension control | Enforce minimum 10 SPI; conduct seam strength tests (ASTM D434); inspect during production |
| Inconsistent Thread Count | Mislabeling, substandard fabric sourcing | Conduct third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Intertek); require mill certificates |
| Pilling on Surface | Low fiber quality, short staple cotton or low-grade polyester | Specify long-staple cotton (e.g., Supima); conduct Martindale or ASTM D3512 pilling tests |
| Misaligned Patterns | Poor fabric cutting or sewing alignment | Use digital pattern-matching guides; conduct inline QC checks at sewing stage |
| Stitching Defects (Skipped Stitches, Loops) | Machine maintenance issues, operator error | Implement daily machine calibration; train staff; use automated stitch counters |
| Odor (Musty or Chemical) | Poor storage, residual chemicals from dyeing | Enforce clean, dry storage; conduct smell tests; require VOC-free processing |
| Incorrect Labeling / Packaging | Language errors, missing care symbols | Audit packaging line; use standardized label templates compliant with ISO 3758 (care symbols) |
| Foreign Objects (Needles, Threads) | Poor housekeeping | Implement metal detection and final visual inspection; enforce 5S practices |
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001, OEKO-TEX®, and BSCI certifications.
- Pre-Production Checks: Require fabric lab dips, strike-offs, and proto samples.
- In-Line Inspections: Conduct at 30% and 70% production milestones.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): AQL 2.5 (General), AQL 1.0 (Critical defects) per ISO 2859-1.
- Third-Party Testing: Engage SGS, Intertek, or TÜV for random batch testing on chemical and physical performance.
Conclusion
Sourcing high-quality bedding sets from China requires rigorous technical oversight and compliance verification. By enforcing strict material specifications, dimensional tolerances, and certification standards—and proactively addressing common defects—procurement managers can ensure consistent product quality, reduce returns, and maintain brand integrity in competitive global markets.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Partner with audited suppliers and invest in end-to-end quality control protocols to mitigate risks and optimize supply chain performance in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Q1 2026 Edition
Confidential – For Professional Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Wholesale Bedding Sets
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for bedding set manufacturing, offering 30–50% cost advantages over Western alternatives. However, 2026 market dynamics (rising labor costs, ESG compliance demands, and supply chain fragmentation) necessitate strategic sourcing precision. This report clarifies White Label vs. Private Label pathways, deconstructs cost drivers, and provides actionable MOQ-based pricing intelligence to optimize procurement ROI.
Key Cost Drivers: 2026 Outlook
| Factor | 2025 Baseline | 2026 Projection | Impact on Bedding Sets |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Material Costs | +4.2% YoY | +5.8% YoY | Organic cotton (+7.2%); Recycled polyester (+4.5%) |
| Labor Costs (Eastern China) | +6.1% YoY | +7.3% YoY | Automation offsets 15–20% of increases |
| ESG Compliance | Moderate | High | Mandatory eco-certifications (GOTS, OEKO-TEX®) add 3–5% to base costs |
| Logistics (Shanghai Port) | $1,850/40ft | $2,100/40ft | Geopolitical volatility continues |
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory’s existing design; your label only | Fully customized (fabric, design, packaging) | Private Label for differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500+ units) | Moderate (1,000+ units) | White Label for test launches |
| Cost Premium | Base price + 5–8% | Base price + 15–25% | Budget 20%+ for PL R&D |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days | Factor 30+ days for PL compliance testing |
| IP Protection | Limited (design ownership unclear) | Full ownership via contract | Non-negotiable for PL |
| Best For | Budget entry, flash sales, generic SKUs | Brand building, premium positioning, DTC | 85% of SourcifyChina clients choose PL long-term |
Critical Insight: Private Label now dominates strategic sourcing (72% of 2025 SourcifyChina contracts) as retailers combat commoditization. White Label margins eroded by 12% in 2025 due to Amazon saturation.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Queen Bedding Set: Duvet Cover + 2 Shams + Sheet Set)
Based on 200 TC Cotton-Polyester Blend (55% Cotton / 45% Polyester), 100% Cotton Sateen Finish
| Cost Component | Base Cost (2026) | % of Total | 2026 Pressure Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.20–$10.50 | 62% | Organic cotton +7.2% YoY; Dye costs up 9% (REACH compliance) |
| Labor | $2.10–$2.80 | 18% | Stitching/embroidery complexity drives variance |
| Packaging | $0.95–$1.40 | 8% | Eco-packaging (FSC paper, soy ink) adds 22% vs. plastic |
| Compliance | $0.75–$1.10 | 7% | Mandatory OEKO-TEX® + country-specific labeling (e.g., EU Textile Regulation) |
| Factory Margin | $1.80–$2.40 | 15% | Shrinking due to competition; negotiable at higher MOQs |
| TOTAL (FOB Shanghai) | $13.80–$18.20 | 100% | Excludes freight, tariffs, duties |
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (FOB Shanghai, Per Unit)
Queen Size Set | 200 TC Cotton-Polyester | Standard Packaging | Q1 2026 Forecast
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Total Order Cost | Key Cost Variables | Strategic Advice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $17.50 – $22.00 | $8,750 – $11,000 | High mold/set-up fees ($800–$1,200); Low labor efficiency | Only for White Label test batches. Avoid for PL (per-unit cost too high) |
| 1,000 units | $15.20 – $18.80 | $15,200 – $18,800 | Set-up fees amortized; Standard compliance included | Optimal entry for Private Label. Balance cost efficiency & risk. |
| 5,000 units | $13.10 – $16.40 | $65,500 – $82,000 | Full economies of scale; Bulk material discounts; Automation utilization | Maximize ROI for established SKUs. Requires 120+ day cash flow planning. |
Footnotes:
– Prices assume EXW/FOB terms; excludes 5–12% import duties (varies by destination).
– Premium materials (e.g., 100% organic cotton) add 22–35% across all tiers.
– 2026 “MOQ Trap” Alert: Factories increasingly charge $300–$600 for revisions to tech packs after sample approval.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Avoid White Label for Core Collections: Commodity pricing erodes margins; use only for clearance channels.
- Lock PL Tech Packs Early: 2026 factory capacity is booked 4–5 months ahead. Delay = 15–20% cost penalty.
- Audit ESG Compliance: 68% of EU-bound shipments faced delays in 2025 due to incomplete documentation.
- Leverage MOQ 1,000+: The “sweet spot” for PL cost efficiency without excessive inventory risk.
“In 2026, bedding sourcing success hinges on treating suppliers as innovation partners – not just cost centers. Demand co-engineering of sustainable materials to future-proof margins.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
Data Source: SourcifyChina Supplier Network (327 verified bedding factories), China Textile Export Council, 2026 Cost Modeling Engine.
Confidential – For Client Use Only. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Not for Redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Product Category: China Wholesale Bedding Sets
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale bedding sets from China offers significant cost advantages and access to a mature textile manufacturing ecosystem. However, procurement success hinges on accurate supplier classification, rigorous due diligence, and risk mitigation. This report outlines the critical steps to verify manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and genuine factories, and identify red flags to avoid in 2026.
Critical Steps to Verify a Bedding Set Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Legal Business License (Business Scope Verification) | Confirm the entity is legally registered and authorized to manufacture textiles. Verify business scope includes “production,” “manufacturing,” or “textile processing.” |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite or Third-Party Factory Audit | Validate physical production capabilities, machinery (e.g., automatic quilting, cutting, sewing lines), quality control stations, and workforce size. |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & Lead Times | Assess monthly output for bedding sets (e.g., 50,000–200,000 units/month), MOQs, and seasonal scalability. |
| 4 | Examine Raw Material Sourcing & Certifications | Confirm access to certified cotton (e.g., OEKO-TEX®, GOTS), microfiber, or bamboo fabric. Request supplier invoices or mill agreements. |
| 5 | Evaluate Quality Control Processes | Inspect in-process QC, AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) standards (typically 1.5–2.5), and final inspection procedures. |
| 6 | Request Product Samples with Lab Testing | Obtain pre-production samples and verify quality via independent lab tests (e.g., colorfastness, shrinkage, pilling resistance). |
| 7 | Verify Export Experience & Documentation | Review past export shipments, FOB/EXW experience, and familiarity with international compliance (e.g., REACH, CPSIA). |
Recommendation: Use third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, Intertek) for audits and pre-shipment inspections.
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “production” or “manufacturing” as core activity | Often lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Footprint | Owns or operates a physical plant with machinery (e.g., sewing lines, cutting tables, quilting machines) | No production equipment; office-only presence |
| Workforce | Employs in-house operators, technicians, and QC staff | Staff focused on sales, logistics, and sourcing |
| Production Control | Can adjust production schedules, fabric sourcing, and design in real time | Dependent on partner factories; limited control |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs due to direct overhead control | Typically higher margins due to middleman markup |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM services with in-house R&D/design teams | May offer customization but outsources execution |
| Transparency | Willing to provide factory tour (onsite or virtual) | May avoid factory visits or redirect to “partner” sites |
Key Insight: Some integrated suppliers operate as “factory-traders” — owning a factory but also trading externally. Verify the percentage of in-house vs. outsourced production.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Bedding Sets from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor violations, or scam | Benchmark pricing against industry averages; request detailed cost breakdown |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Tour | Likely a trading company or non-operational entity | Demand GPS coordinates, video tour, or schedule third-party audit |
| Lack of Product-Specific Experience | Poor quality control; inability to meet technical specs | Request references, past bedding order samples, or client case studies |
| No Quality Certifications | Non-compliance with international safety/environmental standards | Require OEKO-TEX®, ISO 9001, or BSCI certification |
| Generic or Stock Photos | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Insist on time-stamped photos/videos of actual production line |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High scam risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent Communication or Poor English | Potential misalignment in specifications and timelines | Assign a dedicated sourcing agent or bilingual project manager |
Best Practices for 2026 Procurement Success
- Leverage Digital Verification Tools: Use platforms like Alibaba’s Trade Assurance, Made-in-China.com verified badges, or third-party databases (e.g., Panjiva, ImportGenius) to validate export history.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent: A Mandarin-speaking agent can conduct unannounced audits and verify supplier claims.
- Start with a Trial Order: Place a small MOQ order (e.g., 1–2 containers) to assess quality, packaging, and logistics reliability.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: Prioritize suppliers with transparency, scalability, and compliance — not just price.
- Monitor ESG Compliance: Increasing global scrutiny on labor and environmental practices requires due diligence beyond cost and quality.
Conclusion
In 2026, the Chinese bedding manufacturing landscape remains competitive but complex. Global procurement managers must apply structured verification processes to distinguish true manufacturers from intermediaries and avoid high-risk suppliers. By focusing on transparency, production capability, and compliance, buyers can secure reliable, high-quality bedding set supply chains with sustainable margins.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply Chains
Q1 2026 | sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Bedding Procurement from China
Q3 2026 | Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
The Critical Time Drain in China Sourcing: Bedding Sets
Global procurement managers face relentless pressure to reduce costs while ensuring quality compliance. Sourcing wholesale bedding sets from China—a $28.7B market (2026 Statista)—exposes teams to hidden inefficiencies:
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | Avg. Time Spent per Project | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier discovery & initial vetting | 82 hours | Unverified factories, MOQ mismatches, fake certifications |
| Quality audits & sample validation | 47 hours | Non-compliant materials (e.g., REACH, CPSIA), inconsistent dye lots |
| Negotiation & compliance paperwork | 33 hours | Hidden fees, delayed LC processing, customs rejections |
| TOTAL | 162 hours | ~20% project failure rate |
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Cuts Time-to-Market by 68%
Our AI-verified Pro List for China Wholesale Bedding Sets eliminates 110+ hours of manual work per procurement cycle through:
✅ Pre-Validated Export-Ready Factories
All 47 Pro List suppliers:
– Hold active BSCI/SMETA 4-Pillar audits (2026 compliance)
– Maintain MOQs ≤ 500 units for custom bedding sets
– Provide OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 & GOTS-certified fabric options
– Demonstrate 12+ months of proven export experience to EU/NA
✅ Zero-Touch Compliance Assurance
– Automated document verification (ISO 9001, business licenses, tax records) via blockchain-backed platform
– Pre-negotiated Incoterms 2020 (FOB Shanghai/Ningbo) with transparent logistics costs
✅ Real-Time Capacity Tracking
– Live dashboard showing factory availability for tencel/cotton/percale blends (Q4 2026 allocations filling fast)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our bedding sourcing cycle from 14 weeks to 9 days. We redirected 320+ annual hours to strategic initiatives.”
— Head of Procurement, Top 3 EU Home Textiles Retailer (Verified Client)
Your Time-Saving Action Plan
Stop risking delays on unvetted suppliers. In Q4 2026, 73% of premium bedding factories operate at 95%+ capacity (China Textile Export Council). Secure allocations before peak season:
- Access the Verified Pro List – Receive 5 pre-qualified factories matching your specs within 24 hours
- Skip 110+ Hours of Due Diligence – All suppliers pre-screened for:
- Minimum 3 years bedding export experience
- Valid FDA/CE documentation for fill materials
- Ethical labor compliance (no subcontracting)
- Lock Q4 2026 Pricing – Pro List members offer 5-8% volume discounts for committed orders by Aug 30
🚀 Call to Action: Reclaim Your Strategic Time
Your next bedding order doesn’t need to cost 162 hours. With SourcifyChina, procurement shifts from operational firefighting to value-driven partnership.
👉 Take Action in < 60 Seconds:
1. Email: [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST: Bedding Sets [Your Target Volume]”
(Receive supplier dossier + compliance checklist within 4 business hours)
2. WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent Q4 allocation support
(Mention code BEDDING26 for priority factory access)
Deadline: Pro List slots for September 2026 shipments close August 20. 7 factories already at full Q4 capacity.
SourcifyChina: Where Verification Meets Velocity
1,200+ global brands trust our Pro Lists to eliminate sourcing risk. You optimize time. We guarantee integrity.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All supplier data refreshed weekly via on-ground verification teams.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
