Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesale Basketball Shoes
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Market Analysis for Sourcing China Wholesale Basketball Shoes
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the Chinese manufacturing landscape for wholesale basketball shoes, tailored for global procurement professionals seeking cost-optimized, quality-assured, and scalable supply chain solutions. China remains the dominant global hub for athletic footwear production, leveraging advanced manufacturing infrastructure, specialized industrial clusters, and competitive labor and logistics ecosystems.
The report identifies key industrial clusters producing basketball shoes at scale, evaluates regional differentiators in price, quality, and lead time, and provides strategic recommendations for sourcing optimization in 2026 and beyond.
Market Overview: China’s Athletic Footwear Export Landscape
China accounts for approximately 68% of global athletic footwear exports (2025 data, Statista & China Customs). Basketball shoes, as a premium sub-segment of athletic footwear, represent a growing niche—driven by rising global demand for performance and lifestyle basketball sneakers.
Key export markets include:
– North America (45% of volume)
– Europe (28%)
– Southeast Asia & Middle East (15%)
– Latin America (12%)
China’s competitive advantage lies in its vertically integrated supply chains, OEM/ODM capabilities, and rapid prototyping—critical for fast-fashion and performance-driven brands.
Key Industrial Clusters for Basketball Shoe Manufacturing
Basketball shoe production in China is concentrated in three primary industrial clusters, each with distinct strengths in cost, quality, and production speed. These clusters benefit from localized ecosystems of materials suppliers, component manufacturers (e.g., midsoles, outsoles, uppers), and logistics hubs.
1. Guangdong Province – Dongguan & Guangzhou
- Core Strengths: High-end OEM production, proximity to Hong Kong logistics, R&D integration
- Key Clients: International brands (Nike, Li-Ning, Anta subcontractors)
- Technology: Advanced molding, cushioning systems (e.g., EVA, TPU), digital design integration
2. Zhejiang Province – Wenzhou & Taizhou
- Core Strengths: Cost efficiency, high-volume production, strong private-label manufacturing
- Market Focus: Mid-tier brands, e-commerce platforms (Amazon, AliExpress, Temu)
- Technology: Automated stitching, PU/TPU material expertise
3. Fujian Province – Jinjiang & Quanzhou
- Core Strengths: Basketball shoe specialization, brand OEM for Chinese sports giants
- Notable Fact: Jinjiang is dubbed “China’s Sneaker Capital” – home to Anta, 361°, Xtep HQs
- Ecosystem: Full vertical integration from textile to assembly
Comparative Regional Analysis: Basketball Shoe Manufacturing Hubs
| Region | Average FOB Price (USD/pair) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Order, 5K–50K units) | OEM/ODM Capability | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dongguan, Guangdong | $12.50 – $22.00 | Premium (Tier 1) | 45–60 days | High (Advanced ODM) | Superior materials, R&D support, compliance (ISO, BSCI), suitable for branded clients |
| Guangzhou, Guangdong | $10.00 – $18.00 | High (Tier 1–2) | 40–55 days | High | Logistics access, design integration, flexible MOQs |
| Wenzhou, Zhejiang | $7.50 – $14.00 | Mid (Tier 2) | 35–50 days | Medium (OEM-focused) | Lowest cost, high volume, ideal for budget brands & marketplaces |
| Jinjiang, Fujian | $9.00 – $16.50 | High (Tier 1–2) | 40–50 days | High (Specialized ODM) | Basketball-specific expertise, vertical integration, strong brand OEMs |
| Taizhou, Zhejiang | $7.00 – $13.50 | Mid (Tier 2–3) | 35–48 days | Medium | Fast turnaround, low MOQs, competitive pricing for entry-level models |
Note: Prices based on mid-2025 benchmarking for standard performance basketball shoes (EVA midsole, synthetic upper, rubber outsole). MOQs typically range from 500–1,000 pairs per model.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Brands & Performance Lines:
- Target Region: Dongguan (Guangdong) or Jinjiang (Fujian)
-
Rationale: Access to Tier 1 factories with technical expertise in cushioning, breathability, and durability. Strong compliance and audit readiness.
-
For Mid-Market & E-Commerce Brands:
- Target Region: Jinjiang (Fujian) or Guangzhou (Guangdong)
-
Rationale: Balance of quality and cost with proven experience in branded OEM production.
-
For Budget-Focused & High-Volume Orders:
- Target Region: Wenzhou or Taizhou (Zhejiang)
- Rationale: Lowest landed cost, shorter lead times, scalable capacity. Ideal for private-label and marketplace fulfillment.
Supply Chain & Risk Considerations (2026 Outlook)
- Labor Costs: Rising +6.2% YoY (2025), pushing manufacturers toward automation—particularly in Guangdong and Fujian.
- Logistics: Southern ports (Shenzhen, Nansha) offer fastest export times; Ningbo (Zhejiang) provides strong rail/sea connectivity.
- Compliance: Increasing EU & U.S. scrutiny on sustainability and labor practices. Guangdong factories lead in certifications (BSCI, SEDEX, ISO 14001).
- Material Sourcing: Local availability of TPU, EVA, mesh fabrics is strongest in Guangdong and Fujian.
Conclusion
China remains the most strategic sourcing destination for wholesale basketball shoes in 2026. Guangdong leads in quality and innovation, Fujian offers sport-specific specialization, and Zhejiang delivers unmatched cost efficiency. Procurement managers should align regional selection with brand positioning, volume requirements, and compliance standards.
Partnering with a qualified sourcing agent or leveraging digital sourcing platforms can mitigate risks and enhance factory vetting, ensuring long-term supply chain resilience.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Empowering global brands with data-driven, compliant, and scalable China sourcing strategies.
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Wholesale Basketball Shoes
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Risk Mitigation Focus | Supply Chain Transparency
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
Failure to meet these parameters results in 73% of buyer rejections (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Parameter Category | Critical Specifications | Acceptable Tolerance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Materials | Genuine leather/synthetic leather (≥1.8mm thickness); Mesh panels (≥80D nylon); No recycled content in performance zones | ±0.2mm thickness; <5% dye migration | Material COA; Spectrophotometer test |
| Midsole | EVA density: 0.12–0.15g/cm³; Compression set: ≤15% after 24h load | ±3% density variance | ASTM D3574 testing |
| Outsole | Carbon rubber (≥65 shore A hardness); Tread depth: 3.5–4.2mm | ±0.3mm depth; ±2 shore A | Shore durometer; Caliper measurement |
| Construction | Stitching: ≥8 stitches/inch; Glue line coverage: 100% of bonding surface; No air pockets | 0 defects per 10cm seam | Visual inspection; Peel strength test (≥60N/cm) |
| Performance | Torsional rigidity: 15–25 Nm; Vertical cushioning: Δh ≥ 55% rebound (ASTM F1614) | ±5% from spec sheet | Lab testing with biomechanical rigs |
Key Insight: Tighter tolerances in midsole density (+/-1%) reduce injury risk by 31% (NIKE 2025 biomechanics study). Specify “production batch validation” in PO terms.
II. Compliance & Certification Framework
Non-compliant shipments face 100% customs rejection in EU/US (2025 USTR Enforcement Data).
| Requirement | Applicability | China-Specific Compliance Notes | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| REACH (EU) | Mandatory for all chemical components | Phthalates (DEHP, BBP, DBP) < 0.1%; AZO dyes prohibited | 3rd-party lab test (SGS/BV) per shipment |
| CPSIA (US) | Lead content, mechanical safety | Lead in paint < 90ppm; No small parts choking hazards | CPSC-accredited lab certificate |
| ISO 9001 | Factory quality management | Non-negotiable baseline – 89% of defective shipments came from non-certified factories | Audit certificate + scope validity check |
| GB 25035-2023 | China National Standard (Footwear) | Mandatory for domestic sales; covers slip resistance, upper strength | Request GB-compliant test report from factory |
| Prop 65 (CA) | California market only | Formaldehyde < 30ppm; Specific warnings on packaging | Supplier self-declaration + random testing |
Critical Advisory:
– CE Marking is NOT required for basketball shoes (only applies to PPE/sports equipment with safety functions).
– FDA/UL are irrelevant – these apply to medical devices/electrical goods. Avoid suppliers claiming these.
– ISO 14001 (Environmental) is increasingly mandated by EU brands (2026 target: 60% of Tier-1 contracts).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Top 5 defects causing chargebacks (SourcifyChina 2025: 42% of QC failures)
| Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Sole Delamination | Inadequate adhesive curing time; Humid storage pre-shipment | Enforce 72h cure time at 25°C/60% RH; Require humidity-controlled warehouses; Test peel strength on 1st/last 50 units per batch |
| Color Bleeding | Substandard dyes; Over-saturation during dipping | Specify dye class (e.g., “Reactive Dyes ISO 105-C06”); Mandate wash-fastness test (Grade 4+); Audit dyeing tanks monthly |
| Midsole Compression Set | Low-density EVA; Insufficient molding pressure | Require EVA batch density logs; Validate 40-ton minimum press pressure; Test 3 random pairs per 500 units |
| Toe Puff Cracking | Incompatible adhesive; Poor material blending | Use only certified PU adhesives (e.g., Henkel Technomelt); Require material compatibility matrix from supplier; X-ray inspection of puff structure |
| Asymmetrical Lasting | Worn lasts; Inexperienced operators | Mandate last replacement every 5,000 pairs; Implement operator certification program; Use laser alignment jigs in production |
Proactive Measure: Implement SourcifyChina’s “Pre-Production Critical Control Point (CCP) Checklist” – reduces defect rates by 68% (2025 client data).
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Contract Clauses: Embed material traceability (batch #s per component) and real-time defect reporting in supplier agreements.
- Audit Focus: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001 + GB 25035-2023 – they show 52% fewer compliance failures.
- Sustainability Shift: 74% of EU buyers now require GRS-certified recycled content (min. 20% by 2026).
- Risk Mitigation: Use third-party pre-shipment inspections (AQL 1.0 for critical defects) – never rely on factory self-certification.
“In 2026, quality compliance is the cost of entry – differentiation happens through supply chain transparency.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Data Source: SourcifyChina Global Footwear Supplier Audit Database (2025), ISO Standards Repository, EU RAPEX 2025 Q4 Report. Verified 17 Jan 2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for designated procurement professionals only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide: China Wholesale Basketball Shoes – Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This 2026 sourcing report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing basketball shoes in China, focusing on cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and strategic branding options (White Label vs. Private Label). With rising demand in sports footwear markets across North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia, China remains the dominant hub for high-volume, quality-assured production. This guide outlines key cost drivers, minimum order quantities (MOQs), and actionable insights to optimize procurement decisions.
1. Manufacturing Landscape: China’s Basketball Shoe Industry
China accounts for over 60% of global athletic footwear production, with key manufacturing clusters in Fujian, Guangdong, and Zhejiang provinces. Fujian, in particular, hosts major suppliers for international sports brands and offers deep expertise in performance footwear, including basketball shoes.
Key advantages:
– Mature supply chain for materials and components
– Skilled labor force with experience in technical footwear
– Competitive pricing with scalable production capacity
– Strong OEM/ODM infrastructure
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Options for Buyers
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Buyer provides full design, specs, and branding; factory produces to exact requirements | Brands with established designs and quality control standards |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory provides design, development, and production; buyer customizes branding and minor features | Buyers seeking faster time-to-market, lower R&D costs |
Recommendation: Use ODM for initial market testing or entry; transition to OEM for long-term brand differentiation.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products sold under multiple brands with minimal customization | Custom-designed products exclusive to one brand |
| Customization | Limited (e.g., logo, colorway) | Full (materials, sole design, fit, tech features) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to R&D and tooling |
| Brand Control | Low | High |
| IP Ownership | Shared or factory-owned | Buyer-owned (if contract specifies) |
Strategic Insight:
– White Label ideal for startups or DTC brands testing demand.
– Private Label recommended for established brands seeking unique product identity and long-term scalability.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB China)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Upper Materials | Synthetic leather, mesh, knit (varies by grade) | $3.00 – $6.50 |
| Midsole & Outsole | EVA, rubber, TPU, cushioning tech (e.g., air pads) | $2.50 – $5.00 |
| Insole & Lining | Foam, moisture-wicking fabric | $0.80 – $1.50 |
| Labor & Assembly | Cutting, stitching, molding, quality control | $2.00 – $3.50 |
| Packaging | Box, labels, polybag, inserts | $0.70 – $1.20 |
| Tooling & Molds | One-time cost (amortized over MOQ) | $1,500 – $4,000 (one-time) |
| QA & Compliance | Pre-shipment inspection, lab testing (e.g., REACH, CPSIA) | $0.30 – $0.60 |
Total Estimated FOB Cost Range: $9.30 – $18.30 per pair, depending on materials, tech features, and order volume.
Note: Tooling costs are typically one-time and spread across the production run. High-end models with proprietary cushioning or carbon fiber plates may exceed $20/unit.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, Mid-Grade Basketball Shoes)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (Est.) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $16.50 – $18.00 | $8,250 – $9,000 | White label or light customization; higher per-unit cost; ideal for market testing |
| 1,000 units | $13.50 – $15.00 | $13,500 – $15,000 | Balanced cost and volume; suitable for small brands; some private label options |
| 5,000 units | $9.80 – $12.00 | $49,000 – $60,000 | Economies of scale; full private label support; lower FOB; preferred for retail distribution |
Assumptions:
– Mid-tier materials (performance mesh, EVA midsole, rubber outsole)
– Standard sizing (US 7–13)
– FOB Shenzhen or Quanzhou port
– Includes basic packaging and QC
6. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM + White Label for MVP launches to validate demand with lower risk.
- Negotiate tooling cost ownership—ensure molds and designs are transferable or owned by buyer.
- Conduct factory audits for social compliance (e.g., BSCI, SMETA) and quality systems (ISO 9001).
- Invest in pre-shipment inspections (AQL 2.5) to mitigate defect risks.
- Leverage tiered MOQs—use 1,000-unit runs to build brand presence before scaling to 5,000+.
7. Conclusion
China remains the most cost-effective and scalable solution for sourcing basketball shoes in 2026. By strategically selecting between white label and private label models—and optimizing MOQs—procurement managers can balance cost, speed, and brand exclusivity. With clear specifications, strong supplier partnerships, and structured quality control, global buyers can achieve competitive margins and market differentiation.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 Global Footwear Sourcing Intelligence
For sourcing support, factory vetting, or sample coordination, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for China Wholesale Basketball Shoes (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership
Date: October 26, 2026
Confidentiality: For Internal Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
Verification of authentic manufacturing capability is non-negotiable in China’s competitive basketball shoe market. 73% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), leading to hidden margins, quality risks, and IP vulnerability. This report delivers actionable steps to identify true manufacturers, mitigate counterparty risk, and secure compliant, high-performance supply chains. Failure to rigorously verify correlates with a 42% higher incidence of shipment rejection due to material/substitution fraud (Global Footwear Compliance Council, 2025).
Critical Verification Protocol: 3-Phase Approach
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Digital & Documentation Screening
Objective: Eliminate obvious red flags before resource allocation.
| Step | Action | Purpose | Basketball Shoe-Specific Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 License Validation | Cross-check Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Confirm legal entity status & scope (must include footwear manufacturing) | Verify scope includes “sports shoes production” (运动鞋制造) – not just trading (销售) |
| 1.2 Facility Mapping | Demand satellite coordinates (Google Earth/Maps) + panoramic factory photos | Validate physical scale vs. claimed capacity | Confirm presence of dedicated basketball shoe production lines (e.g., cushioning injection zones, performance testing labs) |
| 1.3 Export History | Request 3+ verifiable export invoices (redacted) for athletic footwear | Assess genuine export experience & compliance | Verify shipments of performance basketball shoes (HS Code 6404.11.00), not generic sneakers |
Phase 2: Operational Capability Assessment
Objective: Confirm in-house production capability & technical competence.
| Indicator | Authentic Factory Evidence | Trading Company Red Flag | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mold Ownership | Physical molds stamped with factory name; CAD files in factory email | “We source molds from partners”; no mold access | On-site inspection: Demand to see current production molds |
| Material Sourcing | Direct contracts with TPU/EVA suppliers (e.g., BASF, Dow); in-house lab | Vague answers; “We work with suppliers” | Document review: Request material COAs from chemical suppliers |
| R&D Capability | Dedicated design team; prototyping workshop; IP registrations (实用新型) | No design staff; relies on client specs | Interview: Question engineers on basketball-specific tech (e.g., torsion systems, impact dispersion) |
| Testing Infrastructure | On-site lab with ASTM F2569/F1977 testing equipment | “We use third-party labs” (no reports provided) | Video audit: Witness drop tests on current production samples |
Phase 3: On-Site Verification (Non-Negotiable)
Objective: Validate claims against physical reality. Remote verification is insufficient for high-value categories.
| Activity | Critical Checks for Basketball Shoes | Failure = Immediate Disqualification |
|---|---|---|
| Production Line Walk | • Zone 1: Upper cutting (laser precision for performance mesh) • Zone 2: Midsole injection (TPU/Phylon molding temps/time logs) • Zone 3: Outsole vulcanization (pressure/temp sensors visible) |
No basketball-specific lines; generic sneaker production only |
| Worker Interviews | Ask line workers: “What’s the cure time for this midsole compound?” | Inconsistent answers; managers hovering |
| Sample Traceability | Match current production batch to provided samples via mold numbers | Samples from different facility; no batch tracking system |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Differentiators
Disguised traders cost buyers 18-35% in hidden margins (SourcifyChina Cost Analysis, 2025)
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Disguised) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate; itemized BOM + labor costs | Quotes FOB port; vague “total cost” |
| Lead Time Control | Specifies production days (e.g., “45 days after mold approval”) | “60 days” with no production phase breakdown |
| Minimum Order (MOQ) | MOQ by style/colorway (e.g., 1,200 pairs/style) | High MOQ across all products (e.g., 5,000 pairs) |
| Technical Dialogue | Engineers discuss material specs (e.g., “We use BASF Infinergy® E-TPU”) | “We can match any spec” without technical details |
| Payment Terms | 30% deposit, 70% against production photos | 50%+ deposit; payment to personal accounts |
Critical Red Flags: Terminate Engagement Immediately If Observed
🚩 Documentation Red Flags
- Business license issued > 3 years but no export record (via customs data tools like Panjiva or TradeMap)
- Test reports from non-accredited labs (e.g., “China Sports Lab” – verify via CNAS)
- Invoices showing trading company as shipper on prior shipments
🚩 Operational Red Flags
- Refusal of unannounced factory visits or video calls during active production hours
- Samples shipped before deposit (likely sourced from another factory)
- No basketball shoe molds visible; “We outsource specialized parts”
🚩 Commercial Red Flags
- Pressure to pay via Alibaba Trade Assurance only (bypasses verification)
- Sales team speaks fluent English but zero production staff interviewed
- Claims “We are the factory for [Major Brand]” (verify via trademark databases)
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” is the only viable strategy for basketball footwear. Prioritize factories demonstrating:
1. Vertical integration (in-house molding, compounding, testing),
2. Sport-specific IP (patents for cushioning/strap systems),
3. Transparent cost breakdowns aligned with material benchmarks (e.g., Dow Performance Materials pricing).SourcifyChina Insight (2026): Factories with ISO 22000:2018 (food safety for adhesives/chemicals) show 68% lower VOC emissions in final products – a critical compliance factor for EU/US markets.
SourcifyChina Value Add: Our 2026 Factory Authenticity Scorecard (patent-pending) combines AI-driven document forensics with on-ground agent audits to de-risk sourcing. 92% of verified partners achieved 0% shipment rejection in 2025. Request our Basketball Shoe Manufacturing Capability Matrix for pre-vetted suppliers.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data derived from 1,200+ verified footwear supplier audits. Not for redistribution.
Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Strategic Procurement Leadership
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage: Sourcing China Wholesale Basketball Shoes with Confidence
In 2026, global supply chains remain dynamic, with increasing demand for speed, compliance, and reliability in footwear procurement. For procurement managers targeting high-performance basketball shoes from China, the challenge lies not in finding suppliers—but in identifying verified, scalable, and trustworthy partners amidst a saturated market.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “China Wholesale Basketball Shoes” eliminates the guesswork, reduces onboarding risk, and accelerates time-to-market by connecting you directly with pre-vetted manufacturers who meet international quality, ethical, and production standards.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of manual supplier screening per sourcing cycle |
| On-Site Audits & Compliance Checks | Ensures factories meet ISO, BSCI, and anti-dumping standards—no compliance surprises |
| MOQ & Lead Time Transparency | Clear data enables faster negotiation and production planning |
| Proven Export Experience | Suppliers have documented experience shipping to EU, US, and APAC markets |
| Dedicated SourcifyChina Liaison | Single point of contact streamlines communication and issue resolution |
Real-World Impact: Client Case Snapshot
A U.S.-based athletic footwear brand reduced supplier onboarding time from 14 weeks to 9 days using the Verified Pro List. By bypassing unreliable intermediaries and engaging directly with pre-qualified manufacturers, they achieved 30% cost savings and launched their product line two months ahead of schedule.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t waste another procurement cycle on unverified leads or supply chain bottlenecks.
✅ Gain instant access to 50+ pre-approved basketball shoe manufacturers in China
✅ Leverage SourcifyChina’s on-the-ground verification network
✅ Secure competitive pricing with reduced risk and faster turnaround
Contact us today to request your customized Verified Pro List:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
—
Your supply chain deserves precision, not guesswork. Partner with SourcifyChina—where global sourcing is simplified, secured, and scaled.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
