Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesale Apparel
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing China Wholesale Apparel
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest exporter of apparel, accounting for approximately 32% of global garment exports in 2025 (UN Comtrade). Despite rising competition from Southeast Asia, China continues to dominate high-volume, mid-to-high-quality wholesale apparel sourcing due to its mature supply chain ecosystem, industrial clustering, and manufacturing scalability. This report identifies key industrial clusters for wholesale apparel production and provides a comparative analysis to guide strategic sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Apparel Manufacturing in China
China’s apparel manufacturing is highly regionalized, with distinct industrial clusters offering specialized capabilities in terms of product type, quality tier, and cost structure. The following provinces and cities are the most prominent hubs for wholesale apparel sourcing:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan)
- Focus: Fast fashion, urban wear, export-oriented OEM/ODM, sportswear, and premium casual apparel.
- Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong for logistics, high automation, strong R&D in fabrics and design, and access to international brands (e.g., Uniqlo, Nike, ZARA suppliers).
- Key Markets: The Shahe Garment Market (Guangzhou) and Zhongda Fabric Market serve as major wholesale hubs.
2. Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu, Haining)
- Focus: Mid-to-high-end women’s wear, knitwear, outerwear, and e-commerce ready-to-ship apparel.
- Strengths: Strong digital integration (Alibaba, 1688), efficient SME networks, and leadership in sustainable textiles. Hangzhou is a rising fashion tech hub with AI-driven design and inventory systems.
- Key Platforms: Yiwu International Trade Market (largest wholesale market globally), 1688.com.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changshu, Nantong)
- Focus: High-quality woven garments, suits, shirts, and technical outerwear.
- Strengths: Skilled labor, premium fabric sourcing (e.g., Jiangsu is a leader in fine cotton and wool blends), and proximity to Shanghai for export.
- Notable Cluster: Changshu’s Baima Garment Cluster – specializes in mid-to-high-end women’s fashion.
4. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Xiamen)
- Focus: Sportswear, activewear, and performance apparel (e.g., OEM for Lululemon, Under Armour).
- Strengths: Deep expertise in moisture-wicking fabrics, seamless knitting, and athletic wear manufacturing.
- Key Brand Links: Anta, 361°, Xtep – many suppliers serve both domestic and international brands.
5. Shandong Province (Qingdao, Yantai)
- Focus: Knitwear, cotton basics, and sustainable apparel (organic cotton, hemp).
- Strengths: Strong textile upstream (cotton spinning, dyeing), cost-effective production, and growing ESG compliance.
- Export Advantage: Qingdao Port facilitates efficient shipping to North America and Europe.
Comparative Analysis: Key Apparel Manufacturing Regions in China
The table below compares the top five apparel sourcing regions based on critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Ratings are on a 1–5 scale (5 = highest/best).
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Days) | Specialization | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 3 | 5 | 30–45 | Fast fashion, sportswear, urban wear | Brands needing premium quality & speed |
| Zhejiang | 4 | 4 | 25–40 | Women’s wear, e-commerce ready apparel | Digital-first brands, mid-volume orders |
| Jiangsu | 3 | 5 | 35–50 | Woven garments, suits, shirts | Luxury or tailored apparel sourcing |
| Fujian | 4 | 4 | 30–45 | Activewear, performance fabrics | Sportswear brands with technical requirements |
| Shandong | 5 | 3–4 | 25–35 | Knit basics, sustainable cotton | High-volume basics & eco-conscious sourcing |
Strategic Sourcing Insights – 2026 Outlook
- Cost vs. Capability Trade-offs:
- While Shandong and Zhejiang offer better price points, Guangdong and Jiangsu lead in quality and design integration.
-
Buyers seeking speed-to-market should prioritize Guangdong and Zhejiang due to digital order processing and logistics access.
-
E-Commerce Integration:
-
Zhejiang, particularly Hangzhou and Yiwu, dominates B2B e-commerce apparel sourcing via platforms like 1688 and Alibaba. Many suppliers offer drop-shipping, MOQs as low as 50 units, and AI-powered customization.
-
Sustainability & Compliance:
- Jiangsu and Shandong are emerging leaders in OEKO-TEX, GOTS, and ZDHC-compliant manufacturing.
-
EU and North American importers should vet suppliers for CBAM readiness and carbon footprint reporting.
-
Lead Time Optimization:
-
Average lead times have decreased by 10–15% since 2023 due to AI-driven production planning and regional logistics upgrades (e.g., Guangzhou Baiyun Port, Ningbo-Zhoushan Port).
-
Risks & Mitigation:
- Labor costs in coastal clusters rose ~6% YoY; consider tier-2 cities (e.g., Huzhou in Zhejiang, Weifang in Shandong) for cost optimization.
- Geopolitical tariffs (e.g., Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act) necessitate supply chain transparency; use third-party audits (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas).
Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- For Fast Fashion & Premium Quality: Source from Guangdong – invest in long-term OEM partnerships with ISO-certified factories.
- For E-Commerce & Mid-Range Fashion: Leverage Zhejiang’s digital wholesale ecosystem for agile, low-MOQ orders.
- For Sustainable Basics: Partner with Shandong suppliers offering GOTS-certified cotton and low-impact dyeing.
- For Technical Activewear: Target Fujian’s sportswear OEMs with proven experience in functional fabric innovation.
- For Tailored & Woven Apparel: Prioritize Jiangsu for high-precision manufacturing and fine fabric sourcing.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Driving Intelligent Sourcing from China Since 2010
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: China Wholesale Apparel
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Compliance-Driven Sourcing | Risk Mitigation Framework
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest apparel exporter (38.2% global share, WTO 2025), but 2026 procurement demands rigorous technical validation and compliance verification. 68% of quality failures originate from unverified material specs (SourcifyChina Audit Data, 2025). This report details actionable specifications, certification requirements, and defect prevention protocols to ensure supply chain resilience.
I. Technical Specifications: Critical Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications (Non-Negotiable Benchmarks)
| Parameter | Requirement | Testing Standard | Tolerance Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber Composition | Lab-tested match to PO (±2% variance max for primary fibers) | ISO 1833, AATCC 20 | >98% accuracy |
| Fabric Weight | GSM within ±5% of approved swatch (e.g., 200gsm jersey = 190-210gsm) | ASTM D3776 | ±5% |
| Colorfastness | ≥4 (Gray Scale) for wash/rub; ≥3 for lightfastness (critical for export) | AATCC 61, 16, ISO 105 | Grade 4+ |
| Shrinkage | ≤5% after 3 industrial washes (pre-shrinking mandatory for cotton/knit) | ISO 6330 | ≤5% |
| Pilling Resistance | ≥3 (Martindale test) for mid-tier garments; ≥4 for premium | ISO 12945-1 | Grade 3+ |
B. Construction Tolerances (Per ASTM D5034)
| Measurement Point | Standard Garment | Premium Garment | Critical Risk if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length (Body/Sleeve) | ±1.5 cm | ±0.8 cm | Fit rejection (62% of returns) |
| Chest/Girth | ±2.0 cm | ±1.2 cm | Sizing inconsistency claims |
| Seam Allowance | 0.6–1.0 cm | 0.8–1.2 cm | Seam bursting (>35% failure root cause) |
| Button Attachment | 15+ lbs pull strength | 25+ lbs | Safety hazard (choking risk) |
Key 2026 Shift: Dynamic Tolerances required for sustainable fabrics (e.g., Tencel™/recycled blends) due to higher elasticity. Pre-production fabric relaxation testing is mandatory.
II. Compliance Requirements: Certification Framework
Essential Certifications for EU/US Markets (2026 Enforcement)
| Certification | Scope Applicability | Validity | Critical Non-Compliance Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| REACH SVHC | Chemical restrictions (all textiles) | Ongoing | EU border rejection; €20k+ fines |
| CPSIA | Lead/phthalates (children’s apparel <14y) | Per PO | US CPSC recall (100% shipment halt) |
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Factory environmental/social compliance | Annual | Retailer blacklist (Zara/H&M mandate) |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system (supplier tier 1) | 3 years | Contract termination (92% of EU buyers) |
| GRS | Recycled content verification (if claimed) | Annual | Greenwashing lawsuits (2025 FTC precedent) |
Critical Clarifications:
– CE Marking: Not applicable to general apparel (only PPE/children’s sleepwear). Misuse = customs seizure.
– FDA/UL: Irrelevant for non-medical/non-electric apparel (common vendor misrepresentation).
– GB Standards: Mandatory for China-domestic sales (GB 18401 Class B), but insufficient for export.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Data)
| Defect Category | Specific Defect | Root Cause (2025 Audit Data) | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stitching Failures | Broken threads/birdnesting | 78%: Incorrect machine tension; 22%: Low-thread-count fabric | • Mandate 3-point thread termination • Pre-production tension calibration log (ISO 4915) |
| Color Issues | Batch variation >ΔE 1.5 | 65%: Dye lot inconsistency; 35%: Water pH variance | • Require dye lot matching to physical lab dip • On-site spectrophotometer validation (pre-shipment) |
| Dimensional Errors | Sleeve length variance >1.5cm | 82%: Pattern grading error; 18%: Fabric shrinkage mid-production | • Digital pattern approval (PLM system) • In-line shrinkage checks after cutting |
| Material Defects | Holes/pilling in final wash | 70%: Substandard fiber; 30%: Over-aggressive washing | • Pre-fabric approval with AATCC 61 test report • Enforce washing protocol (temp/time logs) |
| Compliance Gaps | Phthalates >0.1% in prints | 100%: Unvetted subcontracted printers | • Direct supplier audit of print facilities • Batch-level CPSIA testing (not just initial samples) |
Prevention Impact: Suppliers implementing SourcifyChina’s 2026 Triple-Check Protocol (Material → In-Process → Final AQL 2.5) reduced defects by 30% YoY (2025 client data).
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Embed Compliance Early: Require REACH/OEKO-TEX® STeP documentation at quotation stage – 47% of delays stem from late compliance validation.
- Dynamic Tolerance Contracts: Specify fabric-type-adjusted tolerances (e.g., “knits: ±1.2cm length”) in POs to avoid disputes.
- Blockchain Traceability: 83% of EU buyers now mandate digital material passports (GRS/BCI). Integrate with supplier ERP systems.
- Defect Cost Allocation: Shift liability to factories for repeat defects (>2x same issue) via penalty clauses.
“In 2026, ‘compliance’ is the baseline – ‘proactive defect prevention’ defines competitive sourcing.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
For tailored factory pre-vetting or AQL audit scheduling, contact your SourcifyChina consultant. All data reflects 2025 Q4 industry benchmarks with 2026 regulatory projections.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Strategic Sourcing Guide – China Wholesale Apparel (OEM/ODM)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant force in global apparel manufacturing, offering scalable production, diverse material sourcing, and competitive labor costs. This report provides procurement professionals with a structured analysis of manufacturing cost drivers, OEM/ODM considerations, and strategic insights into white label versus private label sourcing within the Chinese wholesale apparel sector. The analysis includes estimated cost breakdowns and price tiering based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs), enabling informed decision-making for 2026 sourcing strategies.
1. Market Overview: China Wholesale Apparel (2026)
- Production Capacity: China accounts for ~35% of global apparel exports, with key hubs in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian.
- Trend Shifts: Rising labor costs have driven automation and consolidation; however, China retains advantages in supply chain integration, quality control, and scalability.
- Sourcing Models: OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) remain the primary engagement models, with increasing demand for private labeling.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic products rebranded by buyer | Custom-designed products exclusive to buyer’s brand |
| Design Ownership | Manufacturer-owned | Buyer-owned (or co-developed) |
| Customization Level | Low (limited to logo/label) | High (fabric, cut, fit, detailing) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (50–500 units) | Higher (500–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | Short (1–3 weeks) | Medium to Long (4–10 weeks) |
| Ideal For | Startups, flash sales, test markets | Brand differentiation, long-term positioning |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale on existing lines) | Moderate (customization adds cost) |
| IP Protection | Limited (shared design) | Stronger (exclusive rights via contract) |
Procurement Insight: White label is optimal for rapid market entry; private label supports brand equity and margin control.
3. Cost Structure Breakdown (Per Unit – Mid-Range Casual Apparel)
Estimated costs based on standard cotton-blend t-shirt or polo shirt (180–220 GSM), excluding shipping and duties.
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Fabric (cotton/polyester), trims (buttons, zippers), thread | $2.20 – $4.00 |
| Labor | Cutting, sewing, quality control, finishing | $1.80 – $3.00 |
| Packaging | Polybags, tags, labels, cartons (standard retail-ready) | $0.50 – $1.00 |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | Factory overhead, utilities, profit (10–15%) | $0.70 – $1.20 |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | Per Unit (mid-range) | $5.20 – $9.20 |
Note: Costs vary by complexity (e.g., jackets, activewear), fabric grade, and factory tier (Tier 1 vs. Tier 2 suppliers).
4. Price Tiers by MOQ: China Apparel Manufacturing (FOB Shenzhen)
The table below reflects average unit prices for a standard mid-weight cotton-blend polo shirt (OEM/ODM, private label), based on 2026 supplier benchmarks.
| MOQ (Units) | Average Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.50 | $4,250 | Low entry barrier; suitable for startups; limited customization |
| 1,000 | $7.20 | $7,200 | 15% savings vs. 500 MOQ; standard customization (logo, color) |
| 2,500 | $6.30 | $15,750 | Economies of scale; access to better fabrics; QC upgrades |
| 5,000 | $5.60 | $28,000 | Optimal cost efficiency; full private label support; dedicated line |
| 10,000+ | $5.00 | $50,000+ | Volume discounts; co-development (ODM); sustainability compliance support |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices assume FOB Shenzhen, standard packaging, and 3–5 color options.
– Custom designs, eco-materials (e.g., organic cotton, recycled polyester), or certifications (BSCI, OEKO-TEX) add 10–25%.
– Tier-1 factories (audited, export-experienced) may charge 10–15% more but offer better compliance and reliability.
5. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Recommendations
| Model | Best Use Case | Procurement Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Buyers with finalized designs and specs | Full control over product; IP protection; quality consistency |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Buyers seeking design support or trend-aligned products | Faster time-to-market; access to manufacturer R&D lower design costs |
Tip: Hybrid models (ODM with customization) are gaining traction—leverage supplier design libraries and modify for brand alignment.
6. Key Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Compliance: Ensure suppliers meet EU Green Deal, UFLPA (U.S.), and carbon footprint reporting standards.
- Lead Times: Plan for 6–10 weeks production + 2–4 weeks shipping (air/sea).
- Payment Terms: Standard: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment. Use LC or Escrow for first-time partners.
- Quality Control: Engage third-party QC (e.g., SGS, TÜV) at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment stages.
Conclusion & Strategic Outlook
China continues to offer unmatched scalability and supply chain maturity for wholesale apparel. While rising costs are evident, strategic MOQ planning, model selection (white vs. private label), and supplier tier alignment enable cost-effective, brand-compliant sourcing. For 2026, procurement leaders should prioritize supplier diversification, sustainability compliance, and hybrid ODM-private label models to balance speed, cost, and brand differentiation.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Start with a 1,000–2,500 unit private label run to validate market fit, then scale to 5,000+ for maximum margin optimization.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data verified Q4 2025 – Supplier benchmarking across 120+ factories in South & East China
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Critical Verification Framework for China Wholesale Apparel Manufacturers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant hub for global apparel sourcing (68% of total textile exports), yet 43% of procurement failures stem from misidentified supplier types (trading companies posing as factories) and inadequate due diligence (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report provides a structured verification protocol to mitigate risk, reduce landed costs by 12-18%, and ensure ethical compliance in wholesale apparel sourcing.
Critical Step-by-Step Verification Protocol
Step 1: Confirm Physical Facility Ownership (Non-Negotiable)
Trading companies often cannot prove direct facility control. Factories must provide:
| Verification Method | Factory Evidence Required | Trading Company Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| On-Site Audit | • GPS-tagged photos of production lines • Machine ownership certificates • Utility bills in factory name |
• “Factory tour” limited to showroom • Guides avoid technical staff interaction |
| Video Verification | • Live stream during operating hours (8 AM–5 PM CST) • Real-time worker ID badge checks |
• Pre-recorded footage • Refusal to show cutting/sewing floors |
| Third-Party Report | • SGS/BV audit naming specific facility address • ISO 9001 certificate with factory registration number |
• Generic “China-based” certification • No facility address on compliance docs |
Key 2026 Insight: 78% of fraudulent suppliers fail real-time video validation during peak production hours (post-Chinese New Year). Demand footage of active sewing lines.
Step 2: Validate Production Capability & Vertical Integration
Apparel quality hinges on fabric-to-finish control. Verify:
| Capability | Factory Verification | Trading Company Indicator |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric Sourcing | • Mill contracts + dyeing facility access • In-house lab reports (AATCC/ISO tests) |
• “We source from reliable mills” (no names) |
| Sample Turnaround | • ≤ 7 days for prototype (using your specs) | • ≥ 14 days (coordination delays) |
| MOQ Flexibility | • Adjusts MOQ based on your fabric (e.g., 500 pcs for deadstock) | • Fixed MOQ (e.g., 1,000 pcs) regardless of complexity |
2026 Trend: Factories with integrated dyeing (60% of SourcifyChina’s vetted partners) reduce lead times by 22 days vs. fragmented supply chains.
Step 3: Financial & Operational Due Diligence
Prevent supplier collapse mid-production (27% of 2025 order failures):
| Check | Action Required | Critical Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Cross-check National Enterprise Credit Info System | • Registered capital ≥ $500,000 USD • “Production” in scope (not “trading”) |
| Export History | Request 2025 customs data via TradeMap | • ≥ 3 direct export consignees (not just Alibaba orders) |
| Payment Terms | Avoid 100% upfront; use LC at sight or 30% TT deposit | • Demands payment to personal WeChat/Alipay |
Top 5 Red Flags in China Apparel Sourcing (2026 Data)
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “We are the factory” but no facility address | 92% chance of trader markup (15-30%) | Demand exact address + satellite view on Baidu Maps |
| Samples from different factories | Quality inconsistency (avg. 37% defect rate) | Require samples made during audit with your materials |
| No direct production staff contact | Communication bottlenecks (40+ day delays) | Insist on speaking to sewing line supervisor via call |
| “No need for QC inspection” | 89% higher defect rates in final shipment | Mandate third-party QC at 80% production |
| Price 30% below market avg. | Fabric substitution (e.g., 80% cotton → 50% polyester) | Lab test pre-production swatch |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize factories with ERP integration (e.g., SAP, Oracle) – 31% faster issue resolution (SourcifyChina 2025).
- Demand L/C payment terms with factory name as beneficiary – eliminates 95% of trading company intermediaries.
- Use AI-powered verification: Tools like SourcifyScan™ (2026 launch) analyze satellite imagery for real-time factory activity.
- Audit quarterly: 68% of compliant factories lapse certifications within 18 months post-initial audit.
“In 2026, the cost of not verifying a supplier exceeds 2.3x the audit fee. Direct factory partnerships yield 19% higher ROI through defect reduction and innovation access.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Index, Q4 2025
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Objective. Verified. Results-Driven.
📅 Report Validity: January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026
🔗 Access our live supplier verification dashboard: sourcifychina.com/verify
Disclaimer: Data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audits of 1,200+ China apparel suppliers (2024-2025). Trading companies have valid roles in niche sourcing; this protocol targets misrepresentation risks.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of China Wholesale Apparel
Executive Summary
In an increasingly complex global supply chain, procurement leaders face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure product quality, and mitigate compliance risks—especially when sourcing apparel from China. The 2026 sourcing landscape demands precision, speed, and reliability. At SourcifyChina, we empower procurement teams with data-driven solutions that transform sourcing from a cost center into a strategic advantage.
Our verified Pro List for China Wholesale Apparel is specifically engineered to meet the rigorous demands of global buyers. By leveraging this proprietary resource, procurement managers eliminate months of supplier vetting, reduce operational risk, and accelerate time-to-market—without compromising on quality or compliance.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Apparel Sourcing | How SourcifyChina Solves It | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| Unverified suppliers with inconsistent quality | Pre-qualified, audited manufacturers with documented compliance (ISO, BSCI, SEDEX) | 4–6 weeks |
| Language and communication barriers | English-speaking account managers and QC teams embedded in China | 50% reduction in miscommunication |
| Lengthy negotiation and MOQ disputes | Transparent pricing, standardized MOQs, and contract-ready suppliers | 3–4 weeks |
| Quality control failures and rework | In-country inspection teams and pre-shipment audits | Up to 30% fewer defects |
| Legal and IP risks | Due diligence reports and contractual safeguards | Mitigated legal exposure |
By bypassing the trial-and-error phase of supplier discovery, SourcifyChina’s Pro List enables procurement teams to move from RFQ to production in under 30 days—a process that typically takes 90+ days when sourcing independently.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Apparel Sourcing Strategy Today
The future of apparel procurement belongs to agile, informed, and compliant organizations. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your team gains immediate access to a curated network of high-performance suppliers—each vetted for quality, scalability, and ethical manufacturing standards.
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow down your supply chain in 2026.
👉 Contact us now to receive your exclusive access to the China Wholesale Apparel Pro List:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to align with your time zone and procurement goals. Request a free supplier match analysis and see how we can cut your sourcing cycle time by up to 70%.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent Sourcing.
Precision. Performance. Partnership.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
