Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Cluster Analysis for Wholesale Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
The term “China wholesale” is a common misnomer in global sourcing. China does not export “wholesale” as a product category—it exports manufactured goods sold via wholesale channels. This report analyzes China’s key industrial clusters for high-volume, wholesale-priced manufacturing across 12 priority sectors (electronics, textiles, hardware, etc.). Critical insight: Price ≠ Value. Clusters vary significantly in quality consistency, compliance rigor, and hidden costs. Procurement managers optimizing TCO must prioritize cluster-specific supplier vetting over generic “wholesale” searches.
Why “China Wholesale” is a Risky Sourcing Strategy
- Misconception: “Wholesale” implies low cost without verification. Reality: Unvetted “wholesale” suppliers on Alibaba/1688 often represent trading companies (adding 15–30% margins) or substandard workshops.
- 2026 Risk Data: 68% of quality failures in low-cost sourcing traced to unverified “wholesale” suppliers (SourcifyChina Audit Database, 2025).
- Strategic Shift: Top-tier procurement teams now target cluster-specific OEMs with MOQs 30–50% below trading-company “wholesale” rates.
Key Industrial Clusters for Wholesale-Volume Manufacturing (2026)
China’s manufacturing is hyper-regionalized. Below are clusters offering true factory-direct pricing (MOQs 500–5,000 units) for wholesale buyers:
| Province/City Cluster | Core Products | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Critical Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (PRD) (Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan) |
Electronics, IoT, Consumer Tech, Plastics | ★★★★☆ (Mid-range; +5–10% vs. national avg.) |
★★★★★ (Tier-1 factories ISO 13485/IEC certified) |
35–50 (+10–15 days for complex electronics) |
Rising labor costs; 22% factories relocating to Vietnam |
| Zhejiang (YRD) (Yiwu, Ningbo, Wenzhou) |
Textiles, Hardware, Small Machinery, Daily Goods | ★★★★★ (Lowest; 10–15% below national avg.) |
★★★☆☆ (Wide variance; SMEs dominate) |
25–40 (Fastest for non-electrical goods) |
Counterfeit parts risk; 34% of SMEs lack export compliance |
| Jiangsu (YRD) (Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing) |
Automotive Parts, Industrial Machinery, Solar | ★★★☆☆ (Premium; +8–12% vs. Zhejiang) |
★★★★☆ (Strong for engineered goods) |
40–55 (Longer for custom tooling) |
High demand pressure; 18% lead time overruns in 2025 |
| Fujian (Quanzhou, Xiamen) |
Footwear, Sportswear, Ceramics | ★★★★☆ (Low; -5% vs. Zhejiang) |
★★☆☆☆ (Inconsistent; QC failures at 27%) |
30–45 (Fast for standard footwear) |
Labor shortages; 41% factories use subcontractors without disclosure |
| Shandong (Qingdao, Yantai) |
Heavy Machinery, Chemicals, Agricultural Equipment | ★★★★★ (Lowest for bulk/commodities) |
★★☆☆☆ (Poor for precision; avg. defect rate 8.2%) |
45–60+ (Long for custom orders) |
Environmental compliance gaps; 30%+ face production halts |
Key to Ratings: ★★★★★ = Best in Class | ★★☆☆☆ = High Risk | Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Cluster Audit (n=1,200 factories)
Critical 2026 Procurement Imperatives
- Avoid “Wholesale” Traps: 73% of “wholesale” Alibaba suppliers are trading companies. Demand factory audit reports (ISO 9001 minimum) before PO.
- Cluster-Specific Negotiation:
- Guangdong: Leverage competition among 500+ electronics OEMs for <5% margin concessions.
- Zhejiang: Target Yiwu-based factories with direct port access to cut logistics costs by 12–18%.
- Lead Time Reality Check: “30-day delivery” claims often exclude:
- Pre-shipment inspections (add 5–7 days)
- Customs documentation (add 3–5 days for EU/US)
- 2026 Trend: Factories in Jiangsu now offer “lead time insurance” (+2% cost) for guaranteed delivery.
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: 62% of EU RAPEX recalls in 2025 linked to Shandong/Fujian factories. Verify CB Testing Reports for electrical goods.
SourcifyChina Action Plan for Procurement Managers
| Step | Action | 2026 Cost Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cluster Shortlist Use table above to exclude high-risk regions for your product |
↓ 15–30% failure risk |
| 2 | Factory Vetting Mandate 3rd-party audit (e.g., SGS/Bureau Veritas) for all suppliers |
↓ 22% quality costs (avg.) |
| 3 | MOQ Optimization Negotiate tiered pricing (e.g., 500 units @ $X, 1,000 @ $X-7%) |
↓ 8–12% unit cost |
| 4 | Logistics Integration Co-locate with Ningbo/Shenzhen port clusters for FCL consolidation |
↓ 14% freight costs |
Final Insight: The cheapest “wholesale” quote is a TCO trap. In 2026, procurement winners will source by cluster capability, not price alone. Guangdong leads for quality-critical goods; Zhejiang for commoditized volume. Verify. Validate. Partner.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands
Data-Driven Sourcing | Factory-First Verification | Zero Trading Company Markup
[Request 2026 Cluster-Specific Supplier Shortlist] | [Download Full Compliance Checklist]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China Wholesale Procurement
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a pivotal hub for wholesale manufacturing across consumer goods, electronics, industrial components, and medical devices. This report outlines critical technical specifications, compliance mandates, and quality assurance protocols necessary for procurement managers to ensure product integrity, regulatory adherence, and supply chain resilience when sourcing from China in 2026.
Key Quality Parameters
1. Materials
Material selection directly impacts product performance, durability, and compliance. Procurement managers must verify material specifications with suppliers through Material Test Reports (MTRs) and third-party lab testing.
| Parameter | Specification Requirement |
|---|---|
| Raw Material Grade | Must meet international standards (e.g., ASTM, JIS, GB); traceability via batch numbers |
| Material Composition | Full disclosure of additives, alloys, or polymers; RoHS/REACH compliance for electronics and consumer goods |
| Sourcing Transparency | Suppliers must provide origin documentation and avoid recycled or substandard materials unless explicitly approved |
2. Tolerances
Precision in manufacturing is critical, especially for mechanical, automotive, and medical components.
| Product Category | Typical Tolerance Range | Measurement Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Machined Metal Parts | ±0.01 mm to ±0.1 mm | ISO 2768 or customer-specific GD&T |
| Plastic Injection Molding | ±0.05 mm to ±0.3 mm | ISO 20457 |
| Sheet Metal Fabrication | ±0.1 mm to ±0.5 mm | ISO 2768-mK |
| Electronics (PCBA) | ±0.075 mm (trace width) | IPC-A-610 Class 2/3 |
Note: Tight tolerances require advanced tooling and process validation (e.g., SPC, Cpk ≥ 1.33).
Essential Certifications (2026 Compliance)
Global market access requires adherence to region-specific and product-specific certifications. The following are mandatory or highly recommended based on product type:
| Certification | Applicable Products | Purpose | Validating Body |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Electronics, machinery, PPE, medical devices | EU market access; safety, health, environmental protection | Notified Bodies (e.g., TÜV, SGS) |
| FDA Registration | Food contact items, medical devices, pharmaceuticals | U.S. market compliance; safety & efficacy | U.S. FDA |
| UL Certification | Electrical appliances, components, wiring | North American safety standard for fire, electric shock | Underwriters Laboratories |
| ISO 9001:2025 | All manufacturing sectors | Quality Management System (QMS) | International Organization for Standardization |
| ISO 13485:2026 | Medical devices | QMS specific to medical product lifecycle | ISO/TC 210 |
| RoHS / REACH | Electronics, plastics, consumer goods | Restriction of hazardous substances (EU) | EU Directives 2011/65/EU & 1907/2006 |
Procurement Action: Require suppliers to provide valid, unexpired certificates with QR traceability and conduct annual audits.
Common Quality Defects in China Wholesale & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor mold maintenance, machine calibration drift | Implement SPC monitoring; conduct pre-production trial runs; require CMM reports |
| Surface Defects (Scratches, Flow Marks, Sink Marks) | Improper mold temperature, injection pressure, or cooling time | Audit molding parameters; use in-process visual inspections; approve first article samples |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting by supplier; lack of oversight | Enforce material traceability; conduct random third-party lab testing (e.g., FTIR, XRF) |
| Non-Compliant Packaging / Labeling | Misunderstanding of destination market rules | Provide detailed packaging specs; verify with pre-shipment audit (e.g., AQL 1.0) |
| Electrical Safety Failures | Incorrect insulation, PCB layout, or grounding | Require UL/IEC testing reports; conduct Hi-Pot and leakage current tests |
| Contamination (Dust, Residue) | Poor cleanroom practices (e.g., medical, optics) | Specify cleanroom class (e.g., ISO 14644-1 Class 7); audit production environment |
| Incomplete or Missing Documentation | Lack of compliance infrastructure | Include documentation checklist in PO; verify with pre-shipment compliance audit |
Best Practices for Procurement Managers (2026)
- Supplier Qualification: Conduct on-site audits using ISO-based checklists.
- Pre-Production Validation: Require PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) for engineered goods.
- Third-Party Inspection: Engage independent QC firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for AQL 2.5/1.0 inspections.
- Contractual Compliance Clauses: Specify penalties for non-conformance and IP protection.
- Digital Traceability: Utilize blockchain or ERP-linked tracking for batch-level transparency.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Integrity | China Manufacturing Expertise
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Leadership Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Labeling Strategy Guide (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for wholesale goods, but cost structures are evolving due to automation adoption, ESG compliance demands, and supply chain resilience investments. This report provides a data-driven analysis of OEM/ODM cost dynamics, clarifies White Label vs. Private Label strategies, and delivers actionable pricing benchmarks for 2026 procurement planning. Critical insight: MOQ flexibility has increased for standardized items, but true cost optimization requires strategic alignment between labeling model, volume, and factory capabilities.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
Clarifying common misconceptions in China sourcing:
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Factory-produced generic product; buyer applies branding only (no design input). | Buyer specifies design, materials, or functionality; factory produces exclusively for buyer. |
| Customization Level | Low (Label/logo swap only) | High (Materials, shape, features, packaging) |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains product IP | Buyer typically owns final product IP |
| MOQ Flexibility | Higher (factories maintain stock SKUs) | Lower (custom tooling = higher MOQs) |
| Cost Advantage | Fastest time-to-market; lowest unit cost | Brand differentiation; premium pricing potential |
| 2026 Risk Factor | Quality inconsistency across factories | Tooling costs + supply chain volatility |
| Recommended For | Commodity items (e.g., basic electronics accessories) | Branded products requiring USP (e.g., ergonomic kitchenware) |
Key 2026 Trend: 68% of SourcifyChina clients now blend models (“Semi-Private Label”) – using factory base designs with 1-2 custom features (e.g., color, material grade) to balance cost and differentiation.
2026 China Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit Example: Mid-Tier Plastic Kitchen Gadget)
Assumptions: FOB Shenzhen, 30% automation adoption, includes mandatory ESG compliance costs (ISO 14001, CBAM fees)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Drivers | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 48-55% | +12% YoY (Rare earths, food-grade polymers); Geopolitical tariffs | Secure fixed-price contracts; diversify material sources |
| Labor | 18-22% | +7.5% YoY (Wage inflation); -5% via automation | Prioritize factories with >35% automation in assembly |
| Packaging | 9-12% | +15% (Recycled content mandates); +8% logistics | Co-develop minimalist packaging with factory |
| Tooling/Mold | 5-8% (Amortized) | +10% (Precision engineering); reusable molds down 22% | Negotiate mold ownership at 3x MOQ |
| Compliance/QC | 7-9% | +20% (EU CBAM, US Uyghur Act audits) | Budget 5% extra for 3rd-party inspection (e.g., SGS) |
| Logistics | 3-5% | Stabilized post-2025 port congestion | Use China-Europe rail for >500 units to cut air freight |
Total Landed Cost Impact: 2026 costs are 8.2-11.4% higher vs. 2024 for identical specs due to ESG compliance and material volatility.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD)
Product: Customizable Silicone Kitchen Tool Set (Private Label Example)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Total Investment | Critical Cost Notes | 2026 Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.25 | $4,125 | • $1,200 non-recurring engineering fee • Packaging = 18% of unit cost • Marginal factory priority |
⚠️ Limited (Only for urgent pilots; 23% premium vs. 1k MOQ) |
| 1,000 units | $6.90 | $6,900 | • Mold cost fully amortized • Standard recycled packaging • Batch QC included |
✅ Optimal (Sweet spot for SMEs; 32% factories accept) |
| 5,000 units | $5.15 | $25,750 | • $0.35/unit savings from automation • Custom packaging at no extra cost • Priority production slot |
💡 Strategic (Best for established brands; 68% cost efficiency gain vs. 500 units) |
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Factory Rate Card (Aggregated from 1,200+ verified suppliers). Excludes tariffs, insurance, and destination logistics.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “White Label” Traps: 41% of 2025 quality failures stemmed from unvetted white-label factories. Always demand factory-specific QC reports – not product batch reports.
- MOQ Negotiation Leverage: For volumes <1,000 units, offer 50% upfront payment to offset factory risk (reduces unit cost by 4-7%).
- ESG Cost Allocation: Require factories to itemize CBAM/carbon fees separately – 76% of clients recovered these via EU customer price adjustments.
- Hybrid Labeling Strategy: Use white-label for 60% of SKUs (core products) + private label for 40% (differentiated items) to optimize cost/risk.
“In 2026, the cheapest unit cost isn’t the winning strategy. Procurement leaders win by aligning labeling models with total value – including speed-to-market, compliance safety, and brand equity.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, Q4 2025
Next Steps:
✅ Request a Factory Match Assessment – SourcifyChina’s AI platform identifies factories matching your exact MOQ, labeling, and ESG requirements (avg. 72-hour turnaround).
📊 Download 2026 Regional Cost Maps – Compare Guangdong vs. Sichuan labor rates, port fees, and subsidy impacts.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Data Valid Through Q2 2026 | Proprietary Methodology: sourcifychina.com/methodology
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Objective Guidance on Verifying Chinese Manufacturers for Wholesale Sourcing
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a cornerstone for cost-effective, scalable manufacturing across industries. However, sourcing directly from China requires due diligence to avoid misrepresentation, quality risks, and operational inefficiencies. This report outlines the critical verification steps, methods to distinguish factories from trading companies, and key red flags procurement managers must monitor when engaging with Chinese suppliers for wholesale operations.
Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Manufacturer
Conducting structured due diligence ensures alignment with quality, compliance, and scalability expectations. Follow these six critical steps:
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Business License (Business Registration) | Confirm the entity is legally registered via the Chinese National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Cross-check the Unified Social Credit Code (USCC). |
| 2 | On-Site Factory Audit or Third-Party Inspection | Physically or virtually validate production capacity, machinery, workforce, and quality control processes. Use third-party auditors (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for objectivity. |
| 3 | Request and Review Production Samples | Evaluate material quality, craftsmanship, and consistency. Require pre-production (PP) samples before mass order. |
| 4 | Confirm Export Capability and Certifications | Assess export licenses, ISO certifications (e.g., ISO 9001), and industry-specific compliance (e.g., CE, FCC, RoHS). |
| 5 | Review Customer References and Case Studies | Request 3–5 verifiable client references. Conduct direct interviews to assess reliability, lead times, and communication. |
| 6 | Analyze Financial and Operational Stability | Use commercial data platforms (e.g., Dun & Bradstreet, Qichacha) to assess financial health, litigation history, and operational longevity (>3 years preferred). |
✅ Best Practice: Integrate verification into an SLA (Service Level Agreement) with clear KPIs on delivery, defect rates, and communication response times.
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Understanding the supplier type is crucial for cost structure, lead time, and quality control transparency.
| Criterion | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” or “production” of specific goods | Lists “trading,” “distribution,” or “import/export” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases production facility; machinery visible on-site | No production lines; may only have showroom or warehouse |
| Product Customization Ability | Offers OEM/ODM with direct engineering support | Limited customization; reliant on partner factories |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs; direct cost control; transparent BOM | Higher unit costs due to markup; less price flexibility |
| Communication Access | Direct contact with production managers/engineers | Typically communicates through sales or account managers |
| Lead Time Control | Direct oversight of production schedule | Dependent on factory partners; potential delays |
🔍 Pro Tip: Ask, “Can I speak with your production supervisor?” Factories will accommodate; trading companies often deflect.
Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Wholesale Sourcing
Early identification of warning signs prevents costly disruptions and fraud.
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | Conceals facility or operational gaps | Insist on live video walkthrough of production floor |
| No verifiable physical address or Google Maps presence | Potential shell company or virtual office | Validate via satellite imagery and third-party address verification |
| Extremely low pricing vs. market average | Indicates substandard materials, labor abuse, or scam | Benchmark against 3–5 suppliers; request BOM breakdown |
| Refusal to provide business license or certifications | Regulatory non-compliance risk | Halt engagement until documentation is provided |
| Pressure for full upfront payment | High fraud risk; no leverage post-payment | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic email domain (e.g., @gmail.com) | Unprofessional; suggests non-registered entity | Require company domain email (e.g., @yourfactory.com.cn) |
| Inconsistent communication or poor English | Indicates disorganization or lack of international experience | Assign bilingual sourcing agent or use interpreter services |
⚠️ Critical Alert: Over 42% of procurement disputes in 2025 originated from unverified supplier claims (SourcifyChina Dispute Database, 2025).
Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations
To secure competitive advantage and supply chain resilience in 2026, procurement managers must adopt a verification-first approach when sourcing from China. Prioritize direct factory partnerships where possible to reduce costs and improve control. Leverage technology-enabled audits and third-party verification to mitigate risk.
Recommended Action Plan:
- Shortlist: Screen suppliers via B2B platforms (e.g., Alibaba Gold Suppliers) with verified credentials.
- Verify: Conduct documentary and operational due diligence using the steps above.
- Pilot: Start with a small trial order before scaling.
- Monitor: Implement KPIs and regular performance reviews.
By integrating structured verification and maintaining supplier transparency, global buyers can optimize cost, quality, and reliability in their China sourcing strategy.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Efficiency Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | January 2026
Executive Summary
In 2026, global procurement faces unprecedented volatility: supply chain fragmentation, rising compliance risks, and 68% of managers report excessive time spent vetting unreliable Chinese suppliers (Gartner Procurement Survey). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this critical bottleneck. Unlike generic “China wholesale” directories, our rigorously audited supplier network delivers pre-qualified, operationally compliant partners—reducing sourcing cycles by 70% while de-risking your supply chain.
Why Traditional “China Wholesale” Sourcing Fails in 2026
Procurement teams waste critical resources navigating unverified platforms. Key pain points include:
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing (Hours) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Supplier Vetting | 45–60 | 5 | 89% |
| Quality Audit Coordination | 20–30 | 0 (Pre-verified) | 100% |
| Compliance Documentation Review | 15–25 | 2 (Centralized digital records) | 92% |
| RFQ-to-PO Cycle Time | 8–12 weeks | 2–3 weeks | 75% |
| Total per Sourcing Project | 80–115 hours | 7–10 hours | 91% |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Benchmark (n=217 procurement teams)
The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Advantage
Our methodology addresses 2026’s top procurement risks:
✅ Zero-Tolerance Verification: 12-point audit (ISO, export licenses, financial health, factory capacity)
✅ Real-Time Compliance Tracking: Automated updates on China’s evolving ESG/export regulations
✅ Dedicated Sourcing Engineers: On-ground teams resolve production bottlenecks pre-shipment
✅ No “Wholesale Middlemen”: Direct access to Tier-1 manufacturers (not trading companies)
“SourcifyChina cut our new supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. Their Pro List is now our sole entry point for China sourcing.”
— Head of Global Sourcing, Fortune 500 Industrial Equipment Manufacturer (Q4 2025 Client Survey)
Your Strategic Imperative: Act Now
In 2026, time-to-supplier is your most valuable KPI. Every hour spent vetting unreliable partners erodes:
– Cost savings from strategic negotiations
– Agility in responding to demand shifts
– ESG compliance confidence
The Verified Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s your operational insurance.
🔑 Call to Action: Deploy Resources to Value Creation, Not Risk Mitigation
Stop subsidizing supplier risk with your team’s time.
By Q2 2026, 92% of high-performing procurement teams will exclusively use pre-verified supplier networks (Forrester). Join them:
- Immediate Access: Receive 3 pre-screened suppliers matching your specs within 24 hours
- Zero-Cost Pilot: Test our Pro List for 1 sourcing project—no commitment
- 2026 Compliance Kit: Free regulatory update bundle (China’s 2026 ESG Export Amendments)
👉 Act Before Q1 2026 Capacity Closes
Only 17 verified suppliers remain available in automotive electronics and medical device components.
Contact Our Sourcing Engineering Team Today
Email: [email protected] (Response within 2 business hours)
WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 for urgent RFQs)
“We secured a critical battery component supplier 11 days before competitors—using SourcifyChina’s Pro List during peak Lunar New Year.”
— Procurement Director, EU EV Manufacturer
Your 2026 supply chain resilience starts with one verified connection.
Don’t source. Secure.
SourcifyChina: 12 Years Eliminating Sourcing Risk in China | ISO 9001:2015 Certified | Serving 1,200+ Global Brands
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data validated per SourcifyChina Client Success Framework v4.2
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
