Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China T Shirt Wholesale
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing of China T-Shirt Wholesale: Industrial Clusters and Regional Benchmarking
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Release Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale t-shirt manufacturing, offering scalable production, competitive pricing, and evolving quality standards. In 2026, procurement strategies must account for regional specialization, rising labor costs, and compliance with ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) standards. This report provides a data-driven analysis of key t-shirt manufacturing clusters in China, with a comparative assessment of Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, Jiangsu, and Shandong provinces—highlighting trade-offs between price, quality, and lead time.
Key Industrial Clusters for T-Shirt Manufacturing in China
The Chinese t-shirt wholesale market is highly regionalized, with manufacturing concentrated in coastal provinces that offer integrated textile ecosystems, logistics access, and skilled labor pools. Below are the top production hubs:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shantou, Guangdong Delta)
- Core Strengths: High-volume OEM/ODM production, fast turnaround, strong export infrastructure.
- Specialization: Cotton, blended fabrics, sublimation printing, and fashion-forward designs.
- Export Hubs: Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports facilitate rapid global shipping.
2. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Shaoxing, Hangzhou)
- Core Strengths: Premium quality, advanced dyeing and finishing technologies, strong compliance with Western standards (e.g., BSCI, OEKO-TEX).
- Specialization: Organic cotton, Pima cotton, sustainable dyes, private-label premium t-shirts.
- Cluster Note: Shaoxing is China’s largest textile dyeing and finishing center.
3. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Xiamen)
- Core Strengths: Competitive pricing, strong knitwear expertise, mid-tier quality.
- Specialization: Mid-to-high volume runs, sportswear-oriented t-shirts, polyester blends.
- Export Advantage: Proximity to Xiamen port; growing focus on EU and Southeast Asian markets.
4. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changshu)
- Core Strengths: High-quality weaving and knitting, technical fabrics, proximity to Shanghai.
- Specialization: Corporate uniforms, branded apparel, premium cotton.
- Logistics: Access to Shanghai port and rail freight to Europe via the New Eurasian Land Bridge.
5. Shandong Province (Qingdao, Yantai)
- Core Strengths: Cost-effective production, large spinning mills, growing sustainability initiatives.
- Specialization: Basic cotton t-shirts, bulk orders for value retailers.
- Port Access: Qingdao is one of China’s busiest container ports.
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality, and Lead Time (2026 Benchmark)
| Region | Avg. FOB Price (USD/unit, 100% Cotton, MOQ 1,000 pcs) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Port Loading) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1.40 – $2.20 | Medium to High | 18–25 days | Fast fashion brands, seasonal collections, diverse printing needs |
| Zhejiang | $2.00 – $3.50 | High to Premium | 25–35 days | Premium private labels, sustainable brands, EU compliance-focused buyers |
| Fujian | $1.30 – $2.00 | Medium | 20–28 days | Mid-volume orders, sportswear, cost-sensitive buyers |
| Jiangsu | $1.80 – $3.00 | High | 22–30 days | Corporate wear, technical fabrics, high-stitch quality demands |
| Shandong | $1.20 – $1.90 | Medium | 18–26 days | Bulk basics, value retail, high-MOQ cost optimization |
Notes:
– Prices based on standard 180–200gsm 100% cotton crew neck t-shirt, no printing.
– MOQs vary by factory; Guangdong and Fujian offer lower MOQs (500–1,000 pcs).
– Lead times include production, QC, and inland logistics to port. Ex-factory times may be 3–5 days shorter.
– Premium finishes (e.g., garment washing, enzyme treatment) add $0.30–$0.80/unit and 5–7 days.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Speed & Flexibility: Source from Guangdong—ideal for fast-turnaround, trend-responsive brands.
- For Quality & Compliance: Prioritize Zhejiang—factories here lead in audit readiness and sustainable production.
- For Cost Optimization: Shandong and Fujian offer the lowest FOB prices for bulk, standard-grade t-shirts.
- For Premium Positioning: Combine Jiangsu’s fabric quality with Zhejiang’s finishing for luxury basics.
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Sustainability Shift: Zhejiang and Jiangsu are leading in GOTS-certified cotton and waterless dyeing.
- Automation Impact: Guangdong factories are investing in AI-driven cutting and sewing, reducing labor dependency.
- Dual Sourcing: Procurement managers are diversifying across 2–3 regions to mitigate supply chain risks.
Conclusion
China’s t-shirt wholesale ecosystem remains unmatched in scale and adaptability. Regional specialization enables procurement managers to align sourcing decisions with brand strategy—whether driven by cost, speed, or sustainability. In 2026, success lies in strategic cluster selection, supplier vetting for compliance, and leveraging port-adjacent production for just-in-time inventory models.
For SourcifyChina clients, we recommend factory audits in Zhejiang and Guangdong as priority clusters for Q2 2026 sourcing cycles.
SourcifyChina – Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven Sourcing Intelligence
Confidential – For Internal Use by Procurement Teams Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: China T-Shirt Wholesale
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Risk Mitigation Focus | Verified Supply Chain Intelligence
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for t-shirt wholesale (78% market share, 2025 Statista), but evolving compliance landscapes and quality expectations require strategic sourcing. This report details critical technical specifications, mandatory compliance frameworks, and defect prevention protocols to mitigate financial/reputational risk. Note: “Wholesale” does not equate to reduced compliance obligations.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements (Per Garment Category)
| Category | Primary Materials | Key Tolerances | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic Cotton | 100% Combed Cotton (20-30s count) | Weight: ±5% (e.g., 180gsm = 171-189gsm) | Minimum 95% cotton for “100% Cotton” claims (FTC) |
| Premium Blends | 60% Cotton / 40% Polyester (Piqué or Jersey) | Color Fastness: ≥4 (AATCC 61-2024) | Polyester must be recycled (GRS 4.0) if marketed “eco-friendly” |
| Organic | GOTS-Certified Cotton (≥95%) | Shrinkage: ≤3% after 3 washes (ISO 6330) | Must exclude all AZO dyes (even trace levels) |
| Performance | 88% Polyester / 12% Spandex (Moisture-wicking) | Stretch Recovery: ≥90% (ASTM D6772) | Requires functional certification (e.g., ISO 11092) |
B. Construction Tolerances (ISO 3633:2024 Compliance)
- Dimensional Accuracy: ±1.5cm for body length, ±1.0cm for chest width (S-XXL)
- Seam Strength: Minimum 12kgf/cm (ISO 13934-1) for side seams; 8kgf/cm for shoulder seams
- Stitch Density: 12-16 stitches/3cm (critical for durability; <10 = high failure risk)
- Labeling: Care symbols must comply with ISO 3758:2024; fiber content in local language + English
Procurement Alert: 68% of rejected shipments (2025 SourcifyChina data) failed due to unverified material composition or tolerance drift. Always require mill certificates + third-party lab reports.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for EU/US/CA markets. “CE marking” is not applicable to standard apparel (common misconception).
| Certification | Required For | Key Standard | Validity | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | All textile production | STeP by OEKO-TEX® | Annual | Verify facility ID on oeko-tex.com |
| GOTS | Organic claims | GOTS v7.0 (2024) | Annual | Check transaction license on global-standard.org |
| REACH SVHC | EU shipments | Annex XVII | Per batch | Demand full chemical test report (LC-MS/MS) |
| CA Prop 65 | California sales | 27 CFR § 1700 | Per SKU | Specific limits for lead (≤0.1ppm in print) |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system | ISO 9001:2015 | 3-year cycle | Audit factory’s QMS documentation |
Critical Exclusions:
– ❌ CE Marking: Only for PPE (e.g., flame-resistant workwear). Misuse = €20k+ EU fines.
– ❌ FDA/UL: Irrelevant for standard cotton/polyester t-shirts. Beware suppliers falsely claiming these.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina QC Audit Data (12,400+ shipments)
| Defect Type | Severity Impact | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color Variation | High (Brand risk) | Dye lot inconsistency; pH imbalance | • Enforce ±0.5 Delta-E tolerance (CIE 1976) • Require pre-production dye lot approval with lab dip |
| Skew/Twist | Medium (Waste 15-30%) | Uneven tension in knitting; improper cutting | • Audit fabric relaxation time (min. 24hrs post-knitting) • Implement digital pattern grading (CAD) |
| Stitch Pulling | High (Safety hazard) | Low thread count; incorrect needle size | • Specify 100% polyester core-spun thread (Tex 40) • Mandate seam slippage test pre-shipment (ISO 13937-2) |
| Print Cracking | Medium (Returns) | Over-cured plastisol; incorrect mesh count | • Require stretch test on printed samples (≥50% elongation) • Verify screen tension ≥25N/cm² |
| Pilling (Grade 2+) | Low-Medium (Returns) | Low fiber twist; inadequate singeing | • Enforce Martindale test ≥3,000 cycles (ISO 12945) • Source combed cotton (min. 40s count) |
| Label Errors | Critical (Recall) | Language non-compliance; missing care symbols | • Use AI-powered label verification pre-shipment • Cross-check against ISO 3758 + local regulations |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Pre-Production: Require fabric lab dips + strike-offs with signed approval (min. 72hrs hold).
- In-Process QC: Implement 3-stage inspections (cutting, sewing, finishing) – 40% of defects are fixable at sewing stage.
- Compliance Escalation: Audit suppliers’ chemical inventory records (REACH Annex XVII).
- Sustainability Shift: 2026 EU Ecodesign Directive requires digital product passports (DPP) for all apparel by Q3 2027. Start preparing now.
Final Note: The “lowest FOB price” strategy increases defect risk by 3.2x (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark). Invest in factory compliance verification – it reduces total cost of ownership by 18-22%.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy | Data Source: Internal Audit Database (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025), ISO/IEC Standards 2024-2025 Updates
Disclaimer: Regulations are jurisdiction-specific. Verify requirements with local legal counsel. All certifications must be independently validated.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Strategy Guide for China T-Shirt Wholesale – OEM/ODM, White Label vs. Private Label
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, sourcing models, and strategic considerations for procuring wholesale t-shirts from China in 2026. It is designed to support procurement managers in making informed decisions when engaging with OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partners. The report evaluates the differences between white label and private label models, outlines cost components, and presents estimated pricing tiers based on minimum order quantities (MOQs).
China remains the world’s leading exporter of apparel, offering competitive pricing, scalable production capacity, and advanced textile infrastructure. With evolving labor costs, material sourcing trends, and rising demand for sustainable practices, strategic sourcing is essential to maintain margins and brand integrity.
1. Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, standardized t-shirts available for branding with minimal customization. | Fully customized t-shirts designed to buyer’s specifications (fabric, fit, design, packaging). |
| Customization Level | Low – Limited to logo/label application. | High – Full control over design, materials, stitching, and branding. |
| MOQ Requirements | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days |
| Ideal For | Startups, promotional campaigns, resellers | Branded retailers, e-commerce, lifestyle brands |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit savings at low volumes | Economies of scale at higher volumes |
| IP Ownership | Shared or supplier-owned base design | Full IP ownership of final product |
Strategic Insight: White label is optimal for rapid market entry with minimal investment. Private label builds long-term brand equity and differentiation but requires higher upfront commitment.
2. Cost Breakdown: Standard 100% Cotton T-Shirt (OEM/ODM)
The following cost structure is based on a standard short-sleeve, crew-neck t-shirt (180–200 GSM cotton) produced in Guangdong or Fujian provinces—primary hubs for apparel manufacturing.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD/unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric (Cotton) | $0.80 – $1.30 | Varies by cotton grade (combed vs. carded), organic options +$0.40–$0.70 |
| Cut & Sew Labor | $0.90 – $1.20 | Includes cutting, stitching, quality control; semi-automated lines |
| Printing/Embroidery | $0.20 – $0.80 | Screen print (low cost), DTG (higher detail), embroidery (+$0.50–$1.20) |
| Packaging | $0.15 – $0.30 | Polybag + tag; branded hangtags +$0.10–$0.25 |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.25 – $0.40 | Factory operational costs and margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $2.30 – $4.00 | Varies by customization, MOQ, and sustainability standards |
Note: FOB (Free On Board) pricing excludes shipping, import duties, and insurance. Add $0.15–$0.35/unit for sea freight to major global ports (e.g., Los Angeles, Rotterdam).
3. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China)
The table below outlines average unit prices for a standard 100% cotton t-shirt under private label OEM arrangements. Prices assume single-color screen print and basic polybag packaging.
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Value (Est.) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $3.80 – $4.50 | $1,900 – $2,250 | Low commitment; ideal for testing markets |
| 1,000 | $3.20 – $3.70 | $3,200 – $3,700 | Balanced cost and volume; common entry point for brands |
| 5,000 | $2.40 – $2.90 | $12,000 – $14,500 | Significant savings; preferred for retail/e-commerce scaling |
| 10,000+ | $2.10 – $2.50 | $21,000 – $25,000 | Maximum economy of scale; negotiable add-ons (e.g., sustainable materials) |
Note: Prices may increase by 10–20% for eco-friendly materials (e.g., organic cotton, recycled polyester) or complex designs.
4. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Selection
| Factor | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Buyer provides full design & specs | Supplier offers ready-made designs; buyer selects/modifies |
| Development Time | Longer (prototyping, approvals) | Shorter (pre-existing templates) |
| Customization | Full control | Limited to available variants |
| Cost | Higher initial setup, lower long-term | Lower NRE (non-recurring engineering) costs |
| Best For | Unique brand identity, technical apparel | Fast time-to-market, seasonal collections |
Recommendation: Use ODM for initial product testing; transition to OEM once brand positioning is established.
5. Key Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Sustainability Compliance: EU and US markets increasingly demand traceable supply chains. Opt for factories with BSCI, OEKO-TEX®, or GOTS certifications.
- Labor Costs: Rising wages in coastal China (+5–7% YoY) are pushing some production inland or to Vietnam/Cambodia. However, China retains superior quality control and logistics.
- Logistics: Consider hybrid shipping (air for initial samples, sea for bulk) to balance speed and cost.
- Quality Assurance: Implement third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) pre-shipment to mitigate risk.
Conclusion & Recommendations
Procuring t-shirts from China in 2026 requires a strategic balance between cost, customization, and compliance. White label solutions offer agility for new entrants, while private label OEM partnerships enable brand differentiation and scalability.
Procurement Strategy Recommendations:
1. Start with MOQ 1,000 units for private label to validate demand.
2. Prioritize suppliers with in-house design and sampling capabilities.
3. Negotiate packaging and labeling terms early to avoid hidden costs.
4. Build long-term relationships with 2–3 vetted manufacturers to ensure supply resilience.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory audits and cost modeling, contact SourcifyChina’s procurement advisory team.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Scalable Sourcing from China
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional Sourcing Verification Report: China T-Shirt Wholesale (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultancy | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Unverified suppliers remain the #1 cause of quality failures (32% of cases), cost overruns (avg. +24%), and shipment delays (47+ days) in apparel sourcing. In 2026, AI-driven verification and regulatory compliance (e.g., EU EUDR) are non-negotiable. This report delivers actionable steps to validate Chinese t-shirt manufacturers, eliminate hidden intermediaries, and mitigate 90% of supply chain risks.
Critical Verification Steps for Chinese T-Shirt Manufacturers
Follow this 5-stage protocol before signing contracts. Skipping any step risks operational/financial exposure.
| Stage | Action | Verification Tool/Method | 2026 Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Authenticity | Confirm business license validity & scope | • QCC.com (China’s official registry; cross-check license #, registered capital, scope) • Alibaba TrustPass (2° validation only) |
★★★★★ Mandatory for EUDR compliance |
| 2. Physical Verification | Validate factory location & production capacity | • Google Earth Pro (historical imagery review) • Third-party inspection (e.g., SGS/Bureau Veritas; avoid supplier-recommended agents) • Live video audit (demand real-time walk-through of cutting/sewing/finishing floors) |
★★★★☆ AI satellite tools now detect “ghost factories” |
| 3. Production Capability | Assess machinery, workforce, & quality control | • Request machine list (e.g., 20+ single-needle lockstitch machines = min. 5,000 pcs/day capacity) • QC process documentation (AQL 2.5 standard; reject verbal assurances) • Sample lead time test (reputable factories deliver samples in 7-10 days) |
★★★★☆ 2026 trend: IoT machine data sharing (e.g., via Alibaba’s “Factory Connect”) |
| 4. Financial Health | Check credit risk & operational stability | • Dun & Bradstreet China (credit score + litigation history) • Bank reference letter (demand original via your bank) • Export history (via China Customs via third party) |
★★★☆☆ Critical amid China’s 2025 SME credit crunch |
| 5. Ethical Compliance | Verify labor/environmental standards | • SMETA 4-Pillar audit report (non-negotiable for EU/US buyers) • On-site dyeing wastewater test (avoid factories without closed-loop systems) • Worker interview (randomly select staff via video call) |
★★★★★ EUDR enforcement begins Jan 2026 |
Actionable Insight: Insist on a “Verification Fee” payment (USD $300–$500) to the factory. Legit manufacturers absorb this cost; trading companies often refuse, revealing hidden margins.
Trading Company vs. Factory: The 2026 Identification Protocol
78% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies. Hidden intermediaries inflate costs by 15–35% and obscure accountability.
| Indicator | Trading Company | True Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Scope: “Import/Export,” “Trade” (no manufacturing codes) | Scope: “Apparel Manufacturing,” “Textile Production” (Industry Code: C17) |
| Facility Evidence | • Stock photos only • “Factory tour” limited to showroom |
• Real-time production floor video • Machine maintenance logs visible |
| Pricing Structure | • Quotes in FOB port (e.g., FOB Shanghai) • No MOQ flexibility |
• Quotes in EXW factory (EXW Dongguan) • MOQ negotiable based on capacity |
| Communication | • English-fluent but avoids technical details • Redirects to “operations team” |
• Technical staff engages directly (e.g., explains fabric GSM tolerances) • Factory manager signs contracts |
| Digital Footprint | • Alibaba store age <12 months • No Chinese social media (WeChat/Weibo) presence |
• 3+ years Alibaba history • Active WeChat channel with production updates |
Key 2026 Shift: Factories now use blockchain (e.g., VeChain) for real-time production tracking. Trading companies cannot provide this.
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
Ignoring these causes 68% of souring failures (SourcifyChina Client Data, 2025).
- “Too Good” Pricing
- Red Flag: USD $1.80/unit for 100% combed cotton (220gsm) t-shirts (FOB).
-
Reality Check: 2026 baseline = $2.90–$3.40 (valid MOQ 5,000+ units). Lower = recycled fabric or child labor.
-
Refusal to Sign NNN Agreement
-
Critical: Insist on a Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention clause before sharing specs. Chinese courts enforce these.
-
Payment Terms Skewed to Supplier
- Avoid: 100% T/T advance or “no LC accepted.”
-
Standard 2026: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy.
-
No Physical Address Verification
-
Test: Demand a signed letter on factory letterhead mailed to your office. Trading companies use virtual offices.
-
Social Compliance “Certificates” Only
- Scam Alert: Fake BSCI/WRAP reports are rampant. Demand audit video footage and worker ID cross-checks.
Conclusion & SourcifyChina Recommendation
In 2026, verification is not optional—it’s embedded in regulatory frameworks (EUDR, UFLPA). Prioritize factories with: (a) Blockchain production trails, (b) SMETA 4.0 audits, and (c) EXW pricing transparency. Trading companies add cost without control; eliminate them via rigorous stage-gated verification.
Pro Tip: “Start with a pilot order of 500 units. Factories confident in quality won’t resist small batches. Trading companies push for 5,000+ MOQs to hide supplier switching.”
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified T-Shirt Manufacturer Shortlist (pre-screened for EUDR compliance, EXW pricing, and capacity ≥10,000 units/week).
SourcifyChina | Reducing Supply Chain Risk Since 2010
This report reflects verified market intelligence as of January 2026. Data sources: China Customs, Alibaba Trade Assurance, SourcifyChina Client Database (n=1,247).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For recipient use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
For Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Apparel Sourcing: Why the Pro List™ Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
In 2026, global apparel procurement continues to face rising complexity—supply chain volatility, quality inconsistency, and extended lead times. For buyers sourcing China T-shirt wholesale, identifying reliable, scalable, and compliant suppliers remains a top operational challenge.
SourcifyChina’s verified Pro List™ eliminates the guesswork and risk traditionally associated with supplier discovery in China. Our rigorously vetted network of T-shirt manufacturers offers procurement teams a competitive edge through transparency, speed, and supply chain resilience.
Key Benefits of Using the Pro List™ for China T-Shirt Wholesale
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Every manufacturer on the Pro List™ undergoes on-site audits for quality control, production capacity, export compliance, and ethical standards. |
| Reduced Onboarding Time | Cut supplier qualification cycles by up to 70%—skip months of email exchanges and factory visits. |
| Transparent MOQs & Pricing | Access real-time data on minimum order quantities, FOB pricing, and lead times—no hidden costs. |
| Scalable Production Capacity | Partner with factories capable of fulfilling 5,000 to 500,000+ units monthly, with consistent quality. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | Our bilingual sourcing consultants provide end-to-end assistance—from RFQ management to QC inspections. |
Time Saved: The Real ROI of the Pro List™
Traditional sourcing for China T-shirt wholesale typically takes 8–12 weeks for supplier identification, vetting, and sample validation. With the Pro List™, procurement teams reduce this timeline to under 15 days.
This acceleration enables faster time-to-market, reduced inventory holding costs, and greater agility in responding to retail demand cycles.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Global procurement leaders can no longer afford inefficient supplier discovery processes. By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Pro List™, your organization gains immediate access to high-performance T-shirt manufacturers—pre-qualified, performance-tracked, and ready to scale.
Take the next step toward smarter, faster, and more reliable sourcing:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to discuss your volume requirements, quality benchmarks, and delivery timelines.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to Reliable China Sourcing.
Trusted by 1,200+ global brands in 2025. Let us streamline your supply chain in 2026.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
