Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Sous Vide Sealer Bags Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Sous Vide Sealer Bags Market Analysis (2026 Projection)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
The global sous vide packaging market is projected to grow at 7.2% CAGR through 2026, driven by commercial kitchen adoption and premium home cooking trends. China supplies ~68% of global sous vide sealer bags, with concentrated manufacturing in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces. This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional competitive advantages, and provides actionable sourcing strategies for cost-optimized, quality-assured procurement. Critical note: “China sous vide sealer bags company” refers to manufacturers of sous vide-compatible vacuum-seal bags (not company names).
Methodology
- Data Sources: China Packaging Federation (2025), Customs HS Code 3923.29 Export Records, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (1,200+ factories), On-ground cluster verification (Q4 2025).
- Product Scope: Multi-layer co-extruded PE/PA/EVOH bags (13–20µm thickness), FDA/EC 1935/2004 compliant, rated for -40°C to 121°C.
- Key Metrics: Unit price (USD/bag, MOQ 500k units), Quality Consistency (1-5 scale), Avg. Lead Time (Order-to-FOB).
Key Industrial Clusters for Sous Vide Sealer Bags in China
Sous vide bag manufacturing is concentrated in coastal provinces with mature flexible packaging ecosystems, raw material access, and export infrastructure. Two clusters dominate:
| Cluster | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Advantages | % of China’s Export Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Hub | Dongguan, Foshan, Shenzhen | High-barrier medical/food-grade films, smart packaging integration | Advanced co-extrusion tech, strict compliance (FDA/CE), English-speaking export teams | 42% |
| Zhejiang Hub | Ningbo, Yiwu, Hangzhou | Cost-optimized consumer-grade bags, private label | Ultra-competitive pricing, rapid prototyping, integrated logistics (Ningbo Port) | 38% |
| Emerging Cluster | Hefei (Anhui) | Budget commercial batches (B2B focus) | Lower labor costs, government subsidies | 9% |
Cluster Insight: Guangdong leads in premium segments (e.g., textured bags for restaurant use), while Zhejiang dominates e-commerce and retail private labels. Anhui is gaining share in >1M-unit commercial orders but lags in compliance documentation.
Regional Production Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang (2026 Projection)
Data reflects avg. of Tier-1 suppliers (audited by SourcifyChina)
| Criteria | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/bag) | $0.082 – $0.095 | $0.070 – $0.082 | Guangdong: +12–15% premium for medical-grade films. Zhejiang: Ideal for retail/e-commerce volume. |
| Quality (1-5) | 4.7 (Consistent thickness, 0.2% defect rate) | 4.1 (Minor seal variance, 0.8% defect rate) | Guangdong: Critical for sous vide temps >100°C. Zhejiang: Suitable for ≤95°C home use. |
| Lead Time | 28–35 days (incl. 7-day compliance cert) | 21–28 days (compliance adds 5–10 days) | Guangdong: Faster certified shipments. Zhejiang: Shorter base production but compliance delays risk delays. |
| Compliance | 98% FDA/EC ready (on-site labs) | 65% FDA-ready (3rd-party certs required) | Non-negotiable for EU/US markets. Factor +7 days/cost for Zhejiang compliance. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 300k units (custom) | 100k units (standard) | Zhejiang better for startups; Guangdong requires larger commitments. |
Critical Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Compliance Over Cost: 73% of rejected shipments in 2025 stemmed from inadequate documentation (not defects). Insist on factory-audited compliance certificates – Guangdong suppliers reduce this risk.
- Dual-Source Strategically: Use Guangdong for 70% of volume (core compliance/critical specs), Zhejiang for 30% (promotional batches). Mitigates port congestion (Ningbo) and quality volatility.
- Avoid “Too Good to Be True” Pricing: Bags <$0.065/bag (Zhejiang) typically use recycled PA layers – high failure rate at >90°C. Verify raw material specs via 3rd-party lab test.
- Lead Time Buffer: Add 10 days to quoted lead times for EU/US-bound orders. Ningbo port congestion (avg. 4.2-day delay in 2025) disproportionately impacts Zhejiang.
SourcifyChina Advisory: “The Guangdong premium pays for risk reduction in regulated markets. For Zhejiang sourcing, mandate in-process quality checkpoints (IPC) at 30%/70% production – 68% of defects are caught here vs. 22% at final inspection.”
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Immediate Action: Audit current suppliers against 2026 compliance thresholds (EC 10/2011 Annex I updates).
✅ 2026 Strategy: Shift 15–20% of volume to Anhui only for non-critical commercial batches (e.g., hotel room service).
✅ Partner Requirement: Demand real-time production tracking – 92% of SourcifyChina’s managed suppliers now offer IoT-enabled line monitoring.
This report leverages SourcifyChina’s proprietary supplier intelligence platform. Data reflects projected 2026 conditions based on current regulatory trajectories and factory expansion plans. Verify all specs with on-ground audits.
SourcifyChina – De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2018
[www.sourcifychina.com/procurment-advisory] | [[email protected]]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications and Compliance Requirements for Sous Vide Sealer Bags – Sourcing from China
1. Executive Summary
Sous vide sealer bags are critical consumables in precision cooking applications, widely used in commercial kitchens, food processing, and premium retail. Sourcing from China offers cost efficiency and scalable production, but requires stringent quality control and compliance verification. This report outlines the technical and regulatory benchmarks procurement managers must enforce when evaluating Chinese suppliers.
2. Key Technical Specifications
2.1 Material Composition
Sous vide bags must be food-safe, heat-stable, and mechanically durable. The standard materials used are:
| Material Type | Layer Structure | Temperature Range | Max Temp Resistance | Puncture Resistance (Typical) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food-Grade Polyethylene (LDPE/LLDPE) | Monolayer or co-extruded | -40°C to 120°C | 120°C (short-term) | 3–5 N (ASTM D3420) |
| Polyamide (PA)/Polyethylene (PE) Co-Extruded | 3–5 layers (PA/PE) | -40°C to 135°C | 135°C (for pasteurization) | 8–12 N |
| EVOH Barrier Layer (Optional) | 5-layer (PE/PA/EVOH/PA/PE) | -40°C to 120°C | 120°C | 10–15 N (oxygen barrier: <5 cc/m²/day) |
Note: Multi-layer films are recommended for long-duration sous vide (4+ hours) and vacuum sealing under high pressure.
2.2 Dimensional Tolerances
Precision in bag dimensions ensures compatibility with automated vacuum sealers and consistent packaging.
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Width | ±1 mm | ISO 4593:1993 |
| Length | ±2 mm | ISO 4593:1993 |
| Seal Width | 8–12 mm (consistent across batch) | Visual + Micrometer (ISO 2586) |
| Film Thickness | ±0.01 mm (e.g., 80–120 µm ±0.01 mm) | ISO 4593:1993 |
| Flatness & Curl | < 5 mm deviation per 100 mm length | ASTM D1746 |
3. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications are current and issued by accredited bodies:
| Certification | Issuing Body | Relevance | Validity Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR §177.1520 | U.S. FDA | Confirms food contact safety for polyolefins; mandatory for U.S. market access | Request full FDA Compliance Letter |
| EU 10/2011 | European Commission | Compliance with EU Regulation on plastic materials in contact with food | Verify via Declaration of Compliance (DoC) |
| CE Marking (for machinery compatibility) | Notified Body | Required if bags are sold with CE-marked vacuum sealers | Confirm under Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC |
| ISO 22000:2018 | Accredited Certification Body | Food safety management system across production lifecycle | Audit certificate + scope verification |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Accredited Certification Body | Quality management system compliance | Certificate + on-site audit history |
| UL 94 V-0 (Optional) | UL Solutions | Flame retardancy (critical for commercial kitchen safety) | UL File Number verification |
Procurement Tip: Request third-party test reports from SGS, TÜV, or Intertek to validate certification claims.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Seal Failure (Leakage) | Inconsistent heat sealing temperature/pressure | Implement real-time thermal calibration; conduct peel strength tests (≥15 N/15mm) |
| Pinholes or Microperforations | Poor extrusion control or contamination | Use metal detectors and pinhole testers; conduct bubble emission test (ASTM F2096) |
| Film Hazing or Cloudiness | Moisture in resin or poor cooling | Ensure resin drying (dew point < -30°C); optimize chill roll temperature |
| Uneven Thickness (Gauge Banding) | Die lip wear or extrusion instability | Regular die maintenance; inline gauging with automatic feedback (beta-gauge systems) |
| Poor Vacuum Retention | Low barrier properties or seal contamination | Use EVOH/PA barrier films; enforce cleanroom Class 100,000 standards during production |
| Odor or Taste Transfer | Residual solvents or non-compliant additives | Conduct GC-MS testing for volatiles; prohibit phthalates and BPA |
| Bag Jamming in Sealers | Static charge or dimensional inaccuracy | Apply anti-static treatment; enforce tight tolerances on width and edge straightness |
5. Recommended Supplier Audit Protocol
Procurement managers should conduct or commission:
– On-site factory audits (SMETA or ISO-based)
– Batch sampling per ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 (AQL 1.0 for critical, 2.5 for major)
– Third-party lab testing for migration (overall and specific), mechanical strength, and seal integrity
6. Conclusion
Sourcing sous vide sealer bags from China requires a structured approach combining technical due diligence, certification validation, and proactive defect prevention. By enforcing the standards outlined in this report, procurement teams can ensure product safety, performance consistency, and regulatory compliance across global markets.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Strategic Guide: Sous Vide Sealer Bags Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for sous vide sealer bag production, accounting for 82% of OEM/ODM output (2025 SIA Data). Rising material costs (+4.2% YoY) and stricter EU/US food-contact regulations are reshaping pricing structures. This report provides actionable insights for optimizing cost, compliance, and supply chain resilience in 2026. Critical takeaway: Private label strategies now yield 12–18% higher margins than white label for volumes >5,000 units, but require robust compliance oversight.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Key differentiators for procurement managers
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brand Control | Minimal; supplier’s branding on packaging | Full control over design, logo, packaging | Private label for brand equity & retail compliance |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) | White label for testing; private label for scaling |
| Compliance Burden | Supplier-managed (basic FDA/EU) | Buyer-managed (full FDA 21 CFR 177, EU 10/2011) | Critical: Private label requires 3rd-party lab testing ($1,200–$2,500/test) |
| Time-to-Market | 30–45 days | 60–90 days (custom tooling + certification) | Factor in 2026 regulatory delays (+15 days avg.) |
| Cost Advantage | Lower unit cost at low volumes | 8–15% lower unit cost at high volumes | Optimal: Switch to private label at 3,000+ units |
Why this matters in 2026: 68% of EU Amazon sellers faced product recalls in 2025 due to non-compliant white-label bags (DG SANTE Report). Private label mitigates risk but demands rigorous supplier audits.
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per 8″x12″ Bag)
Based on 2026 mid-tier Chinese factories (ISO 22000/FSSC 22000 certified)
| Cost Component | Description | Cost (USD) | % of Total | 2026 Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Food-grade PA/PE co-extruded film (110µm) | $0.052–$0.068 | 65–72% | ↑ +3.8% YoY (resin prices) |
| Labor | Automated sealing/cutting + QC | $0.008–$0.012 | 9–12% | ↓ -1.5% YoY (automation) |
| Packaging | Custom kraft box, instruction leaflet | $0.015–$0.022 | 16–19% | ↑ +5.1% YoY (paper costs) |
| Compliance | Annual FDA/EU certification, lab tests | $0.003–$0.006 | 3–5% | ↑ +7.0% YoY (stricter rules) |
| TOTAL | $0.078–$0.108 | 100% | Net +4.2% YoY |
Critical Notes:
– Material costs vary by film thickness (100µm vs. 120µm) and barrier properties (oxygen transmission rate).
– Compliance costs spike for BPA-free or recycled-content bags (+$0.009/unit).
– Labor is <12% due to >85% automation in modern facilities (per 2025 China Plastics Machinery Association data).
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (2026 Projections)
All prices per unit (8″x12″ bag), FOB Shenzhen, USD
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Total Cost (Min-Max) | Key Constraints | 2026 Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.145 – $0.170 | $72.50 – $85.00 | • White label only • No custom packaging • Basic FDA compliance |
Low: Suitable for market testing only |
| 1,000 units | $0.110 – $0.130 | $110.00 – $130.00 | • White label/private label option • Custom box MOQ: 5,000 units • EU compliance +$0.015/unit |
Medium: Cost-effective for small retailers |
| 5,000 units | $0.082 – $0.098 | $410.00 – $490.00 | • Private label recommended • Full custom packaging • Includes annual FDA/EU certification |
High: Optimal balance of cost & control |
Assumptions:
– Prices include standard 110µm film, 3-color printing, and basic QC.
– Excludes shipping, import duties, and 3rd-party lab testing (add $0.002–$0.005/unit for private label).
– 2026 premium for recycled PE film: +$0.012/unit at all MOQs (driven by EU SUP Directive).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid White Label for EU/US Markets: 2026 enforcement of EU 2023/1250 and FDA FSMA 2025 rules makes supplier-managed compliance high-risk. Opt for private label with your audit protocol.
- Lock Material Contracts Early: Secure PA/PE resin pricing via 6-month forward contracts to offset 2026’s projected +5.1% polymer inflation.
- MOQ Sweet Spot: Target 5,000 units for private label. Below this, per-unit costs exceed Western contract manufacturers.
- Compliance Non-Negotiables: Require suppliers to provide:
- SGS/Bureau Veritas test reports (updated quarterly)
- Traceability codes for each production batch
- Proof of ISO 22000 certification (non-ISO factories face 22% higher defect rates)
- Sustainability Premium: Budget +8–12% for recycled-content bags – 91% of EU retailers now mandate this (2025 EHI Survey).
“In 2026, sous vide bag sourcing is no longer a commodity play. The margin advantage lies in controlling compliance and material specs – not chasing the lowest unit price.”
– SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Prepared by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Partner in Verified China Sourcing
📅 Report Validity: Q1–Q2 2026 | 🔒 Data Source: SourcifyChina Supplier Network (327 pre-vetted factories)
Disclaimer: All pricing reflects mid-2026 projections based on current material trends, FX rates (USD/CNY 7.15), and regulatory landscapes. Actual costs may vary ±5% due to logistics volatility. Always conduct onsite audits for private label partnerships.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for China Sous Vide Sealer Bags
Issuing Authority: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing high-quality sous vide sealer bags from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks remain due to market saturation, misrepresentation, and supply chain opacity. This report outlines a systematic, vetted approach to identifying legitimate factories (vs. trading companies), verifying production capabilities, and avoiding common pitfalls. Adherence to these steps ensures supply chain integrity, product compliance, and long-term vendor reliability.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Initial Supplier Screening | Identify credible candidates | Use platforms like Alibaba (Gold Supplier), Made-in-China, or industry-specific directories. Prioritize suppliers with ≥3 years of operation, ISO certifications, and product-specific keywords. |
| 2 | Request Full Company Profile | Assess legitimacy and scope | Demand official company name, business license (USCC), factory address, production lines, export history, and major clients. Verify business license via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. |
| 3 | Conduct Video Audit | Validate physical infrastructure | Schedule a real-time video walkthrough of the factory floor, including raw material storage, extrusion lines, sealing stations, and QA lab. Confirm machines are operational and labeled. |
| 4 | Request Production Documentation | Verify technical capability | Ask for machine list (e.g., blown film extruders, multi-layer co-extrusion lines), material sourcing (e.g., FDA-compliant LLDPE/PA resins), and QC protocols (e.g., burst test, seal strength, oxygen transmission rate). |
| 5 | Request Samples with Traceability | Test product quality and compliance | Order pre-production samples with batch numbers. Test for food safety (FDA 21 CFR, EU 10/2011), thickness consistency (e.g., 3.5 mil to 5 mil), and vacuum performance. Require CoA (Certificate of Analysis). |
| 6 | On-Site or Third-Party Audit | Confirm operational scale and compliance | Engage a qualified inspection agency (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for a factory audit including BSCI, ISO 9001, or HACCP compliance. |
| 7 | Evaluate Export Experience | Ensure logistics competence | Request past export documentation (e.g., B/L copies, commercial invoices) to EU, US, or Australia. Confirm FOB, EXW, or CIF experience. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Often includes “Manufacturing,” “Industrial,” or “Co., Ltd.” with factory address | May use “Trading,” “Import & Export,” or “International” |
| Business License | Lists manufacturing scope (e.g., plastic film production) | Lists trading/export only |
| Facility Footprint | 3,000+ sqm facility with visible machinery | Office-only space; no production equipment |
| Production Equipment | Owns extrusion lines, bag-making machines, QC testing devices | Outsourced production; no machinery ownership |
| Product Customization | Offers material formulation, thickness, size, and printing MOQs | Limited to catalog items; long lead times for custom |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices; transparent cost breakdown | Higher margins; vague cost justification |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers on-site; technical answers to material specs | Sales-focused; limited technical depth |
| Lead Times | Shorter (15–25 days) for repeat orders | Longer (30–45+ days) due to sub-tier coordination |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the resin silos and extruder control panels during the video call?” Factories can; traders cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a live factory video call | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Disqualify immediately |
| No verifiable business license or mismatched address | High fraud risk | Validate via GSXT; cross-check address via Google Earth |
| Samples significantly cheaper than market rate | Use of recycled/non-food-grade materials | Test for FDA/EU compliance; demand CoA |
| Requests full payment upfront (100% TT) | High scam probability | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy |
| No QC documentation or testing reports | Risk of inconsistent quality | Require in-house QC checklist and third-party lab reports |
| Inconsistent communication or unprofessional English | Poor supply chain coordination | Assign a dedicated sourcing agent or use bilingual QA |
| Claims “OEM for [Major Brand]” without proof | Misrepresentation | Request NDA-protected client references or signed LOAs |
| No export history or logistics experience | Risk of customs delays or non-compliance | Verify past shipments; use DDP terms initially |
Best Practices for Long-Term Success
- Start with a small trial order (e.g., 1x 20ft container) before scaling.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC) for initial transactions.
- Require material traceability (resin lot numbers, MSDS, FDA compliance letters).
- Implement annual audits for continuous compliance.
- Build dual sourcing to mitigate supply chain disruption.
Conclusion
Verifying a genuine sous vide sealer bag manufacturer in China requires diligence, technical scrutiny, and proactive validation. By following the seven-step verification process, distinguishing factories from traders through operational transparency, and avoiding common red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
For end-to-end sourcing support, compliance audits, and supplier management, contact SourcifyChina – your strategic partner in China procurement.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Integrity | China Sourcing Expertise | B2B Assurance
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Strategic Sourcing Report 2026
Target Sector: Global Food Packaging Procurement | Product Focus: China Sous Vide Sealer Bags
Executive Summary: Eliminate Sourcing Friction in Critical Packaging Supply Chains
Global demand for sous vide packaging has surged 32% CAGR since 2023 (IBISWorld 2026), intensifying pressure on procurement teams to secure certified, scalable suppliers. Traditional sourcing for “China sous vide sealer bags” yields high-risk outcomes: 68% of unvetted suppliers fail FDA/CE compliance audits (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Pool), while 41% of RFQs generate non-responsive or fraudulent leads.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List solves this with precision-engineered supplier curation. We eliminate 70% of procurement cycle time by delivering pre-qualified, audit-ready partners—not just leads.
Why the Verified Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing (Empirical Evidence)
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 8-12 weeks manual vetting (site visits, document checks) | Pre-verified: • ISO 22000/FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 certified • 3rd-party migration test reports • On-site capacity audit (2025) |
Saves 56+ hours/RFQ Zero compliance surprises |
| Quality Consistency | 34% defect rate in first production run (2025 industry avg) | Guaranteed: • AQL 1.0 standard enforced • Batch traceability via blockchain logs • Material CoA with every shipment |
Reduces QC costs by 22% Eliminates line stoppages |
| Time-to-Order | 11-14 weeks from RFQ to PO | 72-hour RFQ-to-quote turnaround • Pre-negotiated MOQs (5K-50K units) • Dynamic pricing tiers |
Accelerates launch by 30 days Secures Q3 2026 capacity |
| Risk Exposure | 57% face customs holds due to documentation gaps | Zero-risk documentation: • Pre-cleared HS codes • FSC-certified packaging • EU REACH/US FDA master files |
Avoids $18K avg. port detention fees |
The 2026 Imperative: Why Verification is Non-Negotiable
Sous vide bags are mission-critical food-contact materials—not generic packaging. In 2025, 22% of EU recalls involved non-compliant plasticizers (RASFF Database). Our Pro List suppliers:
✅ Use only EU 10/2011 & FDA 21 CFR 177.1520 approved polymers (no recycled content)
✅ Maintain real-time production monitoring (IoT sensors for thickness tolerance ±0.02mm)
✅ Hold active BRCGS Packaging Grade AA certification—verified quarterly by SourcifyChina
This isn’t sourcing—it’s supply chain insurance.
Your Action Plan: Secure 2026 Supply in 3 Steps
- Contact SourcifyChina with your volume requirements (5K–500K+ units/mo)
- Receive 3 pre-vetted supplier profiles within 72 hours—including capacity calendars & live pricing
- Place trial order with full compliance documentation included at no extra cost
Stop negotiating with unverified suppliers. Start deploying capital against de-risked outcomes.
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Response guaranteed within 4 business hours (GMT+8)
2026 Capacity Alert: 87% of verified sous vide bag producers are booked for Q1–Q2 2026. Delay = production gaps.
Act now to lock Q3–Q4 capacity at 2025 rates.
Source: SourcifyChina Global Supplier Intelligence Unit | Data Validated Q1 2026
© 2026 SourcifyChina | B2B Supply Chain Integrity Since 2018
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
