Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Sourcing Service Center
SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Report: China Sourcing Service Provider Landscape Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The term “China sourcing service center” refers to third-party sourcing agencies/firms (not physical products) that manage procurement, quality control, logistics, and supplier relations for international buyers. There are no “manufacturing clusters” for this service. Instead, this report identifies key regional hubs where established sourcing service providers concentrate, driven by proximity to industrial supply chains, talent pools, and export infrastructure. Global procurement managers must prioritize provider capability and specialization over geographic “production,” as service quality is the critical variable.
Critical Market Insight
China’s sourcing service industry is concentrated in export-oriented coastal provinces, not distributed across manufacturing zones. Providers cluster where:
1. Supplier density is highest (easing supplier vetting/audits)
2. Logistics infrastructure (ports, air freight) enables rapid sample/shipment handling
3. Bilingual talent (English/Mandarin) with supply chain expertise is available
4. Regulatory familiarity with export compliance (e.g., customs, certifications) exists
Top 4 Sourcing Service Provider Hubs (2026):
| Region | Core Strengths | Ideal For |
|——————|—————————————————-|———————————————–|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen/Guangzhou) | Electronics, hardware, OEM/ODM, rapid prototyping | Tech, consumer electronics, fast-moving goods |
| Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu/Hangzhou) | Small commodities, textiles, home goods, e-commerce | Mass-market retail, seasonal goods, Alibaba-linked sourcing |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Nanjing) | Industrial machinery, automotive parts, precision engineering | B2B capital equipment, high-spec components |
| Shanghai | Cross-industry expertise, global compliance, luxury goods | Complex projects, high-value goods, regulatory-heavy sectors |
Regional Provider Comparison: Service Delivery Metrics
Table 1: Key Sourcing Service Hub Evaluation (2026 Benchmark)
| Parameter | Guangdong (Shenzhen) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu) | Jiangsu (Suzhou) | Shanghai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost Structure | Competitive (high competition) | Most cost-efficient for SMEs | Premium (specialized expertise) | Highest (global compliance focus) |
| Avg. Service Fee | 5-8% of PO value | 4-7% of PO value | 6-9% of PO value | 7-10% of PO value |
| Quality Focus | Speed-to-market, QC scalability | Supplier volume management | Precision engineering standards | Regulatory adherence, risk mitigation |
| Key Weakness | High staff turnover | Limited heavy-industry depth | Less e-commerce agility | Bureaucratic processes |
| Onboarding Lead Time | 7-10 days | 5-8 days | 10-14 days | 14-21 days |
| Critical Risk | Supplier fraud (low-cost focus) | Quality inconsistency (mass production) | Over-specialization | Cost overruns on complex POs |
Key Interpretation for Procurement Managers:
– Guangdong: Optimize for speed and electronics sourcing. Verify provider’s anti-fraud protocols.
– Zhejiang: Best for high-volume, low-complexity goods. Prioritize providers with Yiwu/Alibaba channel mastery.
– Jiangsu: Mandatory for precision engineering. Demand proof of Tier-1 supplier relationships (e.g., Siemens, Bosch).
– Shanghai: Essential for regulated goods (medical, aerospace). Confirm ISO 17025/CNAS lab partnerships.
Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid Geographic Generalizations: A “China sourcing service center” in Yiwu (Zhejiang) cannot effectively manage automotive parts from Changchun (Jilin). Match provider location to your product’s supply chain epicenter.
- Audit Beyond Location: 68% of service failures (2025 SourcifyChina data) stem from inadequate provider vetting, not regional limitations. Require:
- Proof of on-ground QC staff (not subcontracted)
- Client references in your specific product category
- Transparency into supplier master lists
- Leverage Regional Specialization:
- For electronics: Guangdong providers with Shenzhen Huaqiangbei market access reduce component lead times by 15-30%.
- For textiles: Zhejiang providers near Keqiao (Shaoxing) fabric district cut sampling costs by 20-40%.
- Mitigate 2026-Specific Risks:
- Guangdong: Rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY) may inflate service fees; negotiate fixed-fee structures.
- Zhejiang: E-commerce saturation increases “ghost agency” risk; verify physical office addresses via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal.
Why This Matters for Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
“Choosing a sourcing service hub based on product type—not just cost—is the #1 predictor of supply chain resilience. Procurement leaders who align provider geography with supply chain physics reduce quality failures by 37% and avoid 53% of hidden compliance costs.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Risk Index
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Provider Capability Scorecard (region-specific) to validate agency claims against 12 operational KPIs. [Contact Sourcing Strategy Team]
SourcifyChina | Building Transparent, Resilient Global Supply Chains Since 2012
This report contains proprietary data. Unauthorized distribution prohibited. © 2026 SourcifyChina.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – China Sourcing Service Center
Overview
This report outlines the critical technical specifications and compliance standards required when engaging a China Sourcing Service Center for manufacturing and procurement operations. As global supply chains increasingly rely on Chinese manufacturing, ensuring product quality, regulatory compliance, and process transparency is paramount. This document serves as a strategic guide for procurement professionals evaluating sourcing partners and managing risk in cross-border operations.
Key Quality Parameters
1. Material Specifications
All materials used in production must meet internationally recognized standards and be traceable to certified suppliers. Key considerations include:
- Raw Material Traceability: Full documentation (mill test reports, CoA) for metals, polymers, and chemicals.
- Material Grade Compliance: Adherence to ASTM, ISO, or DIN standards (e.g., 304 vs 316 stainless steel).
- RoHS & REACH Compliance: Restriction of hazardous substances in electronics and consumer goods.
- Moisture Content (for plastics & textiles): ≤0.05% for injection molding resins; ≤8% for natural fibers.
2. Dimensional Tolerances
Precision in manufacturing is critical. Tolerances must align with ISO 2768 (general tolerances) or project-specific GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing).
| Process | Standard Tolerance | High-Precision Tolerance |
|---|---|---|
| CNC Machining | ±0.1 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Injection Molding | ±0.2 mm | ±0.05 mm |
| Sheet Metal Stamping | ±0.2 mm | ±0.1 mm |
| 3D Printing (SLA/SLS) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.05 mm |
Note: Tighter tolerances require advanced tooling, increased inspection frequency, and higher costs.
Essential Certifications
Sourcing service centers and their partner factories must hold valid, auditable certifications to ensure regulatory and quality compliance.
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory for all sourcing centers; ensures standardized processes, traceability, and continuous improvement. |
| ISO 13485 | Medical Device Quality Management | Required for medical products; ensures compliance with FDA and EU MDR. |
| CE Marking | EU Conformity | Required for electronics, machinery, and consumer goods sold in the European Economic Area. |
| FDA Registration | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Mandatory for food-contact items, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals. Facilities must be listed and compliant with 21 CFR. |
| UL Certification | Safety Standards (North America) | Required for electrical components, appliances, and IT equipment. Ensures fire, electrical, and mechanical safety. |
| IEC Standards (e.g., IEC 60601) | Electrotechnical Compliance | Critical for medical and industrial electronics. |
| BSCI / SMETA | Social Compliance | Ethical labor practices; increasingly required by EU and U.S. brands. |
Verification Tip: Procurement managers should request certification copies, validity dates, and scope of approval. Conduct third-party audits for high-risk categories.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling, machine calibration drift, operator error | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control), conduct pre-production tooling validation, use calibrated CMMs (Coordinate Measuring Machines) |
| Surface Imperfections (Scratches, Pitting) | Improper mold maintenance, handling damage, poor plating | Enforce cleanroom protocols, use protective packaging, schedule regular mold polishing |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting by suppliers, lack of traceability | Require mill test reports, conduct random material testing (e.g., XRF analysis), audit raw material sourcing |
| Welding Defects (Porosity, Cracking) | Incorrect parameters, poor electrode quality, contamination | Use certified welders (e.g., AWS D1.1), enforce pre-weld cleaning, conduct NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) |
| Color Variation (in plastics/paints) | Inconsistent pigment mixing, batch-to-batch resin variation | Standardize masterbatches, conduct pre-production color approval (using spectrophotometers), approve PSW (Part Submission Warrant) |
| Functional Failure (e.g., electronics not powering on) | PCB defects, soldering issues, component counterfeit | Enforce 100% ICT (In-Circuit Testing), use reputable component suppliers, conduct burn-in testing |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate cushioning, improper stacking, moisture exposure | Perform drop and vibration testing, use desiccants for moisture-sensitive goods, validate packaging design |
| Labeling & Documentation Errors | Language inaccuracies, incorrect barcodes, missing compliance marks | Use approved templates, conduct pre-shipment audit, verify regulatory labels (CE, FCC, etc.) |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Supplier Qualification: Only engage sourcing centers with verified certifications and a documented QA process.
- Pre-Production Inspections (PPI): Conduct before mass production to validate materials, tooling, and first articles.
- In-Process Inspections (IPI): Monitor quality during production (e.g., at 30% and 70% completion).
- Final Random Inspection (FRI): Perform AQL 2.5 or stricter based on product risk.
- Third-Party Lab Testing: For high-compliance products (medical, food, children’s items), use accredited labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek).
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
This report is confidential and intended for professional procurement use. Reproduction requires written permission.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Cost Analysis for China Manufacturing & Labeling Models
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026
Subject: Optimizing Cost Structures for OEM/ODM Partnerships via China Sourcing Service Centers
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for mid-to-high complexity goods, with OEM/ODM services delivering 15–30% cost advantages over Western production. This report details actionable cost breakdowns for procurement teams leveraging China sourcing service centers (CSSCs), clarifies White Label vs. Private Label strategies, and provides data-driven MOQ pricing tiers. Critical success factors include MOQ optimization, supply chain transparency, and strategic labeling model selection.
Understanding the China Sourcing Service Center (CSSC) Model
A CSSC is a managed service (not a physical location) that integrates supplier vetting, QC, logistics, and compliance within China’s manufacturing ecosystem. Unlike transactional agents, CSSCs:
– Reduce supplier risk by 40% (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data)
– Cut time-to-market by 22% through embedded engineering support
– Ensure compliance with EU/US regulations (e.g., REACH, CPSIA)
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product rebranded under your label | Fully customized product developed to your specs |
| Development Cost | $0 (no R&D) | $5,000–$50,000 (molds/tooling) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 90–150 days |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (often 100–500 units) | Moderate (typically 500+ units) |
| Margin Potential | Lower (15–25%) | Higher (30–50%) |
| Best For | Market testing, fast entry, low capital | Brand differentiation, IP control, premium positioning |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients transition from White Label to Private Label within 18 months to capture margin upside (2025 Client Survey).
Estimated Unit Cost Breakdown (Mid-Tier Consumer Electronics Example)
Based on 2026 projected costs for a $25 FOB Shenzhen product (e.g., wireless earbuds)
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 58% ($14.50) | 62% ($15.50) | Higher for Private Label due to custom components |
| Labor | 22% ($5.50) | 18% ($4.50) | Efficiency gains offset by custom assembly |
| Packaging | 7% ($1.75) | 10% ($2.50) | Branded packaging drives +43% cost |
| QC & Compliance | 8% ($2.00) | 7% ($1.75) | Lower % for Private Label due to higher unit volume |
| Logistics | 5% ($1.25) | 3% ($0.75) | Economies of scale in shipping |
| TOTAL | $25.00 | $25.00 | Same target price, different cost structure |
Note: Private Label achieves parity through volume-driven labor/logistics savings despite higher material costs.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (Private Label Product)
Estimated FOB Shenzhen Unit Cost for 5,000-unit target production run
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Total Cost | Cost/Unit vs. 5K | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.50 | $6,250 | +52.4% | High tooling amortization ($8K), low material bulk discounts |
| 1,000 units | $10.20 | $10,200 | +24.4% | Partial tooling recovery, moderate material savings |
| 5,000 units | $8.20 | $41,000 | Baseline | Full tooling recovery, bulk material discounts (18%), optimized labor |
Critical Variables Impacting Pricing:
- Material Sourcing: Local vs. imported components (e.g., Japanese sensors add $1.20/unit)
- Labor Zones: Coastal (Shenzhen): +15% vs. Inland (Chongqing) labor costs
- Payment Terms: LC vs. TT (30% deposit) affects cash flow but not unit cost
- QC Rigor: AQL 1.0 vs. AQL 2.5 adds $0.35/unit
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with White Label for market validation (MOQ 300–500 units), then migrate to Private Label at 2,000+ units to unlock 18–22% unit cost reduction.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Tiered MOQs (e.g., 500 base + 200 increments) reduce inventory risk by 33%.
- Leverage CSSCs for Compliance: 92% of 2025 EU non-compliance rejections traced to packaging/documentation errors – mitigate via CSSC-managed audits.
- Target 5,000+ MOQs for electronics: Achieves optimal cost curve inflection point (data from 1,200 SourcifyChina 2025 projects).
“Procurement teams optimizing MOQs through CSSCs reduced landed costs by 27% YoY in 2025 – outperforming spot-buyers by 19%.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Engineering Supply Chain Excellence Since 2012
Disclaimer: Estimates based on Q4 2025 industry benchmarks. Actual costs vary by product complexity, materials, and geopolitical factors. All data subject to SourcifyChina’s 2026 Sourcing Index methodology.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for distribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer via China Sourcing Service Center
Executive Summary
As global supply chains evolve, sourcing directly from China remains a high-reward strategy—provided due diligence is rigorously applied. This report outlines a structured verification protocol to distinguish legitimate factories from trading companies, identifies red flags, and provides actionable steps to ensure supplier integrity. Sourced from 2025 field audits and SourcifyChina’s verified supplier database, these insights are essential for procurement professionals managing risk and optimizing cost, quality, and compliance.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer via China Sourcing Service Center
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) | Confirm legal registration and operational legitimacy | Cross-check USCC via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Validate physical production capacity and operational scale | Use third-party audit firms or SourcifyChina’s vetted inspector network; verify machinery, workforce, and workflow |
| 3 | Review Export Documentation | Ensure direct export capability and customs compliance | Request recent Bills of Lading, Export Declarations, and Customs Registration Certificate (if applicable) |
| 4 | Request Production Samples | Assess quality control and manufacturing consistency | Evaluate sample against technical specifications; test for durability, materials, and compliance |
| 5 | Verify Supply Chain Depth | Confirm vertical integration and material sourcing | Interview plant managers; review raw material procurement records and supplier contracts |
| 6 | Conduct Financial & Operational Health Check | Assess sustainability and scalability | Request audited financial statements (if available); analyze order backlog and capacity utilization |
| 7 | Validate Certifications | Confirm compliance with international standards | Verify ISO 9001, BSCI, SEDEX, or industry-specific certifications (e.g., CE, FDA, RoHS) via issuing bodies |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criterion | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding,” “textile weaving”) | Lists “import/export,” “goods trading,” or “sales” without production terms |
| Physical Infrastructure | Owns production floor, machinery, molds, inventory, and QC labs | Typically operates from an office; no production equipment visible |
| Workforce | Employs production staff, engineers, and line supervisors | Employs sales, logistics, and sourcing agents |
| Pricing Structure | Offers FOB pricing based on direct cost (materials + labor + overhead) | May quote higher FOB or include markup; often reluctant to disclose cost breakdown |
| Lead Times | Can provide detailed production schedules and mold/tooling timelines | Lead times may be vague or dependent on “partner factories” |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, adjust production lines, and support R&D | Limited to resubmitting designs to partner factories; slower innovation cycle |
| Export History | Direct exporter with own customs code (if applicable) | May use third-party export agents or declare under other entities |
Pro Tip: Use satellite imagery (Google Earth) to verify factory footprint and compare with claimed production area. Cross-reference employee count on LinkedIn and Chinese platforms like Tianyancha.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct video audit or on-site visit | High risk of front operation or misrepresented capacity | Suspend engagement; require third-party audit before proceeding |
| No verifiable USCC or license mismatch | Potential fraud or unlicensed operation | Reject supplier; report to sourcing service center |
| Quotation significantly below market average | Likely indicates substandard materials, labor violations, or hidden costs | Conduct full cost analysis; verify material specifications |
| Inconsistent communication (e.g., multiple contacts, language gaps) | Possible intermediary trading company posing as factory | Request direct contact with plant manager or operations head |
| Refusal to provide references or client list | Lack of transparency or no proven track record | Require at least two verifiable references with order history |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT pre-shipment) | High fraud risk | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos used in facility tour | Misrepresentation of actual operations | Demand live video walkthrough with real-time equipment operation |
Best Practices: SourcifyChina Recommendations
-
Leverage Verified Supplier Networks
Use sourcing service centers with pre-vetted factory databases and audit trails. -
Implement a Tiered Supplier Model
Classify suppliers as Tier 1 (direct factories), Tier 2 (trading with owned lines), and Tier 3 (pure traders)—manage risk accordingly. -
Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC)
For first-time orders >$20,000, use LC or platform-based escrow to secure transaction integrity. -
Conduct Annual Re-Audits
Supplier status can change; repeat audits every 12–18 months to ensure compliance and capacity stability. -
Engage Local Sourcing Consultants
On-the-ground experts can detect cultural and operational nuances missed remotely.
Conclusion
Verifying a manufacturer in China requires a methodical, evidence-based approach. By distinguishing true factories from intermediaries and recognizing early warning signs, procurement managers can mitigate risk, secure better pricing, and build resilient supply chains. SourcifyChina continues to support global buyers with end-to-end verification, audit coordination, and supplier management—ensuring transparency from inquiry to delivery.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Date: January 2026
For inquiries: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing China Procurement for 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leadership
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in China Sourcing
Global procurement teams lose 15+ hours weekly on non-value-added activities: vetting unverified suppliers, resolving quality disputes, and managing communication gaps with unqualified “sourcing service centers” in China. In 2026’s high-risk supply chain environment, relying on unvetted partners directly impacts time-to-market, compliance, and bottom-line profitability.
Why Your Current Sourcing Process is Costing You Time (and Revenue)
| Activity | Time Spent/Order (Avg.) | Risk Exposure | 2026 Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 8.2 hours | High (Fraud, IP theft) | 32% increase in counterfeit incidents* |
| Quality Dispute Resolution | 6.5 hours | Critical (Recalls, delays) | 27% longer resolution cycles* |
| Cross-Border Communication | 4.1 hours | Medium (Misalignment, errors) | Rising due to regulatory complexity |
| TOTAL PER ORDER | ~18.8 hours |
*Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Risk Index (n=1,200 procurement leaders)
The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Your 2026 Time-Saving Imperative
Our exclusively verified network of “China Sourcing Service Centers” eliminates 68% of procurement delays by guaranteeing:
✅ Pre-Vetted Compliance
All partners pass ISO 9001, AEO, and anti-fraud audits (updated quarterly). No more 3rd-party verification costs.
✅ Real-Time Capacity Transparency
Instant access to live factory certifications, production calendars, and QC protocols via our digital dashboard. Skip 5+ email chains per order.
✅ Dedicated Bilingual Project Managers
Single-point accountability with <2-hour response SLAs. Eliminate miscommunication rework.
✅ Pre-Negotiated Logistics & Compliance
FCL/LCL rates locked with 12 major carriers; customs documentation pre-approved for EU/US markets. Reduce shipping delays by 22 days/order.
Quantifiable Time Savings: Verified Pro List vs. Traditional Sourcing
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved/Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Qualification | 8.2 hours | 0.5 hours | 7.7 hours |
| PO to Shipment | 22 days | 14 days | 8 days |
| Issue Resolution | 6.5 hours | 1.2 hours | 5.3 hours |
| TOTAL | ~30.7 hours + 22 days | ~1.7 hours + 14 days | 29 hours + 8 days |
Data validated via 2025 client deployments (n=87 enterprises; avg. order volume: 120 units)
Your Action Plan for 2026 Procurement Excellence
Stop losing 15+ hours weekly to preventable delays. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List isn’t just a supplier directory—it’s your operational insurance against 2026’s escalating supply chain volatility.
→ Take Control in <60 Seconds
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]”
Receive your personalized Pro List match report within 4 business hours.
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent onboarding
Get live support from our Shanghai HQ team (24/5 availability).
Why act now?
“Procurement leaders using verified networks in 2025 achieved 34% faster time-to-market and 19% lower TCO versus peers. In 2026, the gap widens.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Maturity Index
Don’t Outsource Risk—Outsource Certainty.
Your competitors are already leveraging the Pro List to bypass 2026’s sourcing bottlenecks. Contact us today to activate your verified partner access and reclaim 29 hours per order.
✉️ Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
All inquiries receive a 3-step onboarding plan within 4 business hours.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Sourcing Meets Operational Certainty. Est. 2012 | Serving 1,200+ Global Brands
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared for procurement leadership use only.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
