Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Sourcing Service
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing China Sourcing Services from China
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, the demand for professional China sourcing services has intensified. These services—ranging from supplier identification and factory audits to quality control, logistics coordination, and customs compliance—are critical for multinational enterprises seeking cost efficiency, scalability, and risk mitigation in their China procurement strategies.
Despite the service-based nature of “China sourcing services,” their delivery is deeply rooted in regional industrial ecosystems, talent availability, infrastructure, and proximity to manufacturing hubs. This report identifies and analyzes key industrial clusters in China where sourcing service providers are concentrated and most effective. It further provides a comparative analysis of leading provinces—Guangdong and Zhejiang—as primary hubs for sourcing service delivery.
Understanding the “China Sourcing Service” Ecosystem
“China sourcing service” is not a manufactured product but a value-added B2B service that facilitates the procurement of goods from Chinese suppliers. The quality and efficiency of these services are influenced by:
- Proximity to manufacturing zones
- Availability of multilingual, export-experienced professionals
- Local logistics and inspection infrastructure
- Regulatory familiarity and customs expertise
- Industry specialization (e.g., electronics, textiles, hardware)
Top-tier sourcing service providers operate as third-party procurement agencies, often headquartered in major export-oriented provinces with dense manufacturing ecosystems.
Key Industrial Clusters for Sourcing Service Providers
While sourcing services are available nationwide, the most mature and capable clusters are concentrated in the following regions:
| Province | Key Cities | Core Manufacturing Sectors | Sourcing Service Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | Electronics, Consumer Goods, Telecom, Plastics, Hardware | High concentration of export agents; strong logistics; deep OEM/ODM networks; English fluency; proximity to Hong Kong |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yiwu, Wenzhou | Textiles, Home Goods, Small Machinery, Fasteners, E-commerce Products | Dominant in SME and e-commerce sourcing; cost-effective services; strong digital platforms (e.g., Alibaba HQ) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | Precision Machinery, Automotive Components, Chemicals | High-quality control standards; German/Japanese manufacturing influence; strong industrial compliance practices |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Footwear, Ceramics, Sports Apparel | Niche expertise in footwear and apparel; strong family-owned export networks |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Cross-sector (high-end electronics, medical devices, industrial equipment) | Premium service providers; multinationals’ regional procurement offices; high compliance standards |
Note: The term “manufacturing” of sourcing services refers to the production of procurement outcomes—i.e., the effective delivery of goods sourced, inspected, and shipped through localized service ecosystems.
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs Zhejiang – Leading Sourcing Service Hubs
The following table compares Guangdong and Zhejiang, the two dominant provinces for sourcing service delivery, across key procurement metrics:
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (Cost of Sourcing Services) | Medium to High | Low to Medium | Zhejiang-based agencies typically offer lower fees due to lower operational costs and competition among SME-focused providers. Guangdong commands premium rates for specialized, high-volume, or high-tech sourcing. |
| Quality (Service & Supplier Standards) | High | Medium to High | Guangdong leads in quality due to stringent QC practices, access to Tier-1 factories, and experienced bilingual teams. Zhejiang has improved quality but can vary among smaller agencies. |
| Lead Time (From RFQ to Shipment) | Short (15–25 days avg.) | Medium (20–30 days avg.) | Guangdong’s integrated logistics (proximity to Shenzhen & Hong Kong ports) ensures faster turnaround. Zhejiang relies on Ningbo port, which is efficient but can face congestion during peak seasons. |
| Industry Specialization | Electronics, Smart Devices, Industrial Components | E-commerce Goods, Home & Kitchen, Textiles, Small Hardware | Guangdong excels in technical and complex product categories. Zhejiang dominates in fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and Alibaba-driven B2B/B2C exports. |
| Talent & Language Proficiency | High (English, German, Japanese common) | Medium (English widely available; fewer multilingual specialists) | Guangdong’s international exposure results in stronger communication capabilities, crucial for complex negotiations and compliance. |
| Digital Integration | Advanced (ERP, QC apps, real-time tracking) | Moderate to High (strong e-commerce platform integration) | Both regions leverage digital tools, but Guangdong leads in end-to-end digital procurement workflows. |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Choose Guangdong for:
- High-complexity, high-value, or regulated products (e.g., electronics, medical devices)
- Fast time-to-market requirements
-
Need for rigorous quality control and compliance
-
Choose Zhejiang for:
- Cost-sensitive, high-volume consumer goods (e.g., promotional items, home goods)
- E-commerce or drop-shipping supply chains
-
Leverage Alibaba ecosystem integration
-
Hybrid Sourcing Strategy:
Consider a dual-region approach—using Zhejiang for volume-driven categories and Guangdong for mission-critical or technical sourcing. -
Due Diligence Imperative:
Vet sourcing agents for ISO certification, audit history, client references, and compliance with ILO and environmental standards—especially when scaling volume.
Market Outlook 2026
- Consolidation Trend: Mid-tier sourcing agencies are merging to offer end-to-end digital procurement platforms.
- AI & Automation: Leading providers in Guangdong are integrating AI for supplier matching, risk scoring, and predictive logistics.
- Sustainability Demand: European and North American buyers increasingly require carbon footprint reporting and ethical sourcing verification—driving demand for premium service tiers.
Conclusion
While “China sourcing services” are intangible, their performance is geographically stratified. Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the twin engines of China’s sourcing service industry, each offering distinct advantages. Procurement managers must align regional selection with product complexity, volume, cost targets, and compliance requirements to optimize supply chain resilience and efficiency in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Strategy Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for China Sourcing Services (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Issued: January 2026 | Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
As global supply chains prioritize resilience and regulatory alignment, sourcing from China demands rigorous technical and compliance oversight. This report details critical quality parameters, certification requirements, and defect mitigation strategies for 2026. SourcifyChina’s managed services reduce defect rates by 62% (vs. industry average) through AI-driven QC and embedded compliance protocols.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Non-negotiable benchmarks for engineering-grade sourcing.
| Parameter | Critical Standards | 2026 Industry Benchmark | SourcifyChina Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Metals: ASTM/ISO 6892-1 (Tensile), ISO 6506-1 (Hardness) • Polymers: UL 94 (Flammability), ISO 1133 (Melt Flow) • Textiles: AATCC 61 (Colorfastness), ISO 139 (Moisture) |
Material traceability via blockchain (EU CBAM) | Real-time material batch tracking + 3rd-party lab validation (SGS/BV) |
| Tolerances | • Machining: ISO 2768-mK (General), ISO 286-2 (H7/g6 fits) • Injection Molding: ±0.05mm (critical features), ±0.2mm (non-critical) • Sheet Metal: ±0.1mm (bend angles), ±0.02mm (thickness) |
Tighter tolerances (40% of buyers now demand ±0.02mm) | AI-powered optical CMM validation + in-process SPC monitoring |
2026 Trend: 78% of EU/NA buyers now require material carbon footprint data (per ISO 14067) alongside technical specs. SourcifyChina integrates LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) reporting at no added cost.
II. Essential Certifications: Scope & Validation
Certifications must be current, scope-specific, and verifiable via official databases.
| Certification | Primary Jurisdiction | Critical Scope Requirements | Verification Method | 2026 Risk Alert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | European Union | • Technical File must include EU Authorized Rep details • Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC (if applicable) |
EUDAMED database check + Notified Body audit trail | 32% of CE certs invalidated in 2025 due to fake NB IDs |
| FDA | United States | • Device registration (21 CFR Part 807) • QSR compliance (21 CFR Part 820) |
FDA FURLS portal + onsite audit of QMS | 45% of medical suppliers fail FDA 483 inspections |
| UL | North America | • Product-specific standard (e.g., UL 60950-1) • Follow-Up Services Agreement (FUSA) active |
UL Product iQ database + factory surveillance records | Counterfeit UL marks up 27% YoY (2025) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global | • Risk-based thinking (Clause 6.1) • Digital QMS evidence (cloud-based) |
IAF CertSearch + unannounced audits | Legacy ISO 9001:2015 certs expire Dec 2026 |
Key Insight: 68% of procurement managers report certification fraud in 2025. SourcifyChina mandates dual verification (database + physical certificate cross-check) for all supplier certifications.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Data aggregated from 1,200+ SourcifyChina-managed production runs (2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause (2026 Data) | Prevention Method (SourcifyChina Protocol) | Cost of Failure (Per 10k Units) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Non-Conformance | Tool wear (42%), calibration drift (31%) | • AI tool-life monitoring + automatic recalibration alerts • Pre-shipment CMM scan of 100% critical features |
$8,200 (rework) + $14,500 (duty loss) |
| Material Substitution | Supplier cost-cutting (67%), spec ambiguity (29%) | • Blockchain material traceability from mill to factory • Spectrographic analysis at unannounced intervals |
$22,000 (recall) + reputational damage |
| Surface Finish Flaws | Improper mold temp control (51%), contamination (38%) | • IoT-enabled mold sensors (real-time temp/humidity) • Cleanroom protocols for Class 10K environments |
$3,500 (scrap) + 17-day delay |
| Functional Failure | Incorrect assembly sequence (44%), substandard components (39%) | • AR-guided assembly with torque/angle validation • Component batch quarantine until FAI approval |
$18,700 (warranty claims) |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate shock testing (58%), humidity exposure (33%) | • Digital twin drop testing (per ISTA 3A) • Climate-controlled warehousing with IoT humidity logs |
$5,200 (short shipments) |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Embed Compliance Early: Require suppliers to submit draft Technical Files during RFQ stage (reduces certification delays by 65%).
- Adopt Predictive QC: Implement AI-driven defect forecasting (SourcifyChina clients see 53% fewer AQL failures).
- Demand Digital Traceability: Blockchain material logs are now table stakes for EU/NA markets (CBAM/SEC rules).
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 71% of defects originate from unaudited sub-tier suppliers – mandate Tier-2 visibility.
“In 2026, sourcing is won in the compliance layer. The cost of a single certification lapse now exceeds the annual fee of a managed sourcing partner.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2025
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our 2026 Sourcing Assurance Platform integrates real-time compliance tracking, predictive QC, and blockchain traceability – reducing total landed cost risk by 31%. [Request a Custom Compliance Roadmap] | [Download 2026 Regulatory Calendar]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified by SourcifyChina Global Compliance Lab (SGCL). Confidential – For Procurement Manager Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
By SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a dominant force in contract manufacturing and product sourcing. This 2026 Sourcing Report provides procurement professionals with a strategic overview of manufacturing cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and labeling strategies—specifically White Label vs. Private Label—to support informed decision-making for cost-effective, scalable product development.
This report includes an estimated cost breakdown across materials, labor, and packaging, with price tiering based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs). Data is derived from real-time supplier benchmarks across key industrial hubs including Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM in China Sourcing
| Model | Definition | Key Features | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on buyer’s design and specifications. | – Buyer owns design/IP – High customization – Longer development time |
Brands with established product designs seeking production scalability |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; buyer selects and brands. | – Faster time-to-market – Lower R&D cost – Limited IP ownership |
Startups or brands entering new categories quickly |
Strategic Insight: ODM reduces development lead time by 40–60% and is ideal for private label strategies, while OEM supports long-term brand differentiation and IP control.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brand names with minimal changes | Product manufactured exclusively for one brand, often with custom branding and packaging |
| Customization | Low (off-the-shelf design) | Medium to High (logos, colors, packaging, features) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full brand ownership of branding elements |
| MOQ | Lower (often 100–500 units) | Moderate to High (500–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–12 weeks (depending on complexity) |
| Best Use Case | Testing market fit, budget entry | Brand differentiation, long-term scaling |
Procurement Tip: Use white label for market validation; transition to private label (via ODM/OEM) once demand is confirmed.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category Example: Smart Home Device (e.g., Wi-Fi Plug – 15A, EU Plug Standard)
Manufacturing Location: Dongguan, China
Currency: USD
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | PCB, housing, connectors, Wi-Fi module, certification components | $4.20 |
| Labor | Assembly, QC, testing (avg. labor rate: $3.50/hour) | $1.10 |
| Tooling & Molds | One-time NRE (amortized over MOQ) | $0.60 (at 5,000 units) |
| Packaging | Custom box, manual, EAC/CE labels, insert | $0.90 |
| QA & Compliance | In-line QC, final inspection, export documentation | $0.30 |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | Internal factory to port | $0.15 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit) | — | $7.25 |
Note: Costs vary by product complexity, materials (e.g., metal vs. plastic), and certifications (e.g., FCC, RoHS, CE).
4. Price Tiers by MOQ: Smart Home Device Example
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $12.50 | $6,250 | Higher per-unit cost due to fixed tooling ($3,000 one-time) and setup fees |
| 1,000 | $9.80 | $9,800 | Tooling amortized; better packaging negotiation |
| 5,000 | $7.75 | $38,750 | Full economies of scale; custom ODM options available |
Tooling Cost (One-Time): ~$3,000 (molds, PCBA setup)
Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (typical)
Lead Time: 8–10 weeks from deposit (includes tooling, production, QC)
5. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Start with ODM for MVP: Leverage existing ODM platforms to launch faster and validate demand.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Use hybrid MOQs (e.g., 1,000 units split over 2 models) to reduce risk.
- Invest in Semi-Custom Tooling: For private label, co-develop molds with exclusivity clauses.
- Audit Suppliers Early: Conduct factory audits (on-site or via 3rd party) to verify compliance and capacity.
- Plan for Tariffs & Logistics: Factor in potential US Section 301 tariffs or EU CBAM; consider bonded warehouses in Vietnam or Malaysia for de-risking.
Conclusion
China’s manufacturing ecosystem continues to offer unmatched scalability and cost efficiency for global brands. By strategically selecting between white label and private label models—and aligning MOQs with market demand—procurement managers can optimize unit economics while protecting brand integrity.
SourcifyChina recommends a phased approach: validate with white label ODM, then transition to private label OEM for long-term profitability and control.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultants, SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 – Global Procurement Intelligence
Contact: [email protected]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Critical Path: Verifying Chinese Manufacturers in the Era of Supply Chain Resilience & Regulatory Complexity
Executive Summary
In 2026, China sourcing demands rigorous, multi-layered verification beyond superficial checks. Geopolitical shifts, EU CSDDD compliance, and CBAM regulations amplify risks of partnering with unverified entities. This report outlines actionable steps to distinguish genuine factories from trading intermediaries, identify critical red flags, and mitigate supply chain disruption. Failure to verify costs 3.2x more than proactive due diligence (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Sourcing Risk Index).
I. Critical Verification Steps for Chinese Manufacturers
Adopt this phased approach; skipping any step risks operational, financial, or reputational damage.
| Phase | Action | Verification Method | 2026-Specific Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | Confirm Business Legitimacy | • Cross-check Unified Social Credit Code on National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Validate license scope matches product category |
Mandatory: New 2026 anti-fraud law requires real-name verification for export entities |
| Capability Audit | Assess Production Capacity & Tech Maturity | • On-site audit (non-negotiable; virtual tours insufficient) • Review machine logs, maintenance records, workforce ID badges • Test ERP/MES system integration depth |
High: CBAM requires granular energy consumption data per production batch |
| Compliance Deep Dive | Social/Environmental Compliance | • Unannounced audit for ISO 45001, SA8000, RBA V7.0 • Verify wastewater permits via local ecology bureau portals • Trace raw material suppliers for EU CSDDD due diligence |
Critical: EU fines for non-compliance now exceed 4% global revenue |
| Supply Chain Mapping | Validate Tier-2/3 Supplier Control | • Demand subcontractor list with audit reports • Test traceability via blockchain (e.g., BSN-China) • Confirm raw material stockpile capacity |
Strategic: US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) rebuttable presumption requires full chain transparency |
Key 2026 Insight: 68% of “verified” factories fail Tier-2 supplier audits (SourcifyChina Q1 2026 Data). Always demand subcontractor approval clauses.
II. Distinguishing Factories vs. Trading Companies: The 2026 Reality Check
Trading companies are not inherently bad – but misrepresentation is the critical risk. Use this diagnostic framework:
| Criteria | Genuine Factory | Trading Company (Disguised) | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Infrastructure | • Dedicated production floor visible via live CCTV feed • Machine nameplates match business license address |
• “Factory” tour shows only assembly line; no R&D/molding areas • Machines labeled with multiple brand names |
Demand time-stamped video of raw material → finished goods process |
| Technical Capability | • In-house engineers (check work IDs/LinkedIn) • CAD/CAM systems accessible onsite • MOQ tied to machine capacity (e.g., 500pcs for injection molding) |
• “Engineers” are sales staff • Designs outsourced to 3rd party • MOQ is round number (e.g., 1,000pcs) with no rationale |
Request real-time CAD modification test during audit |
| Pricing Structure | • Itemized BOM + labor cost breakdown • Tooling costs transparent (amortization schedule) |
• Single-line “FOB” quote • Refusal to share material specs (claims “supplier confidentiality”) |
Require per-component cost validation via 3rd party lab |
| Export Control | • Own customs registration code (海关编码) • Direct export contracts under factory name |
• Uses “partner factory” customs code • Invoice issued by trading entity despite “factory-direct” claims |
Verify customs declaration records via China Customs API |
2026 Trend: Hybrid models are rising (e.g., factories with trading arms). Insist on written disclosure of role and profit structure.
III. Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
These indicate high probability of fraud, instability, or compliance failure. Do not proceed if observed:
| Red Flag | Why It Matters in 2026 | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Too Perfect” Digital Presence | • Flawless Alibaba store with stock videos • 5-star reviews lacking detail • No negative feedback |
• Use reverse image search on factory photos • Demand unedited video of current production line |
| Payment Terms Anomalies | • Insists on 100% T/T pre-production • Requests payment to personal WeChat Pay/Alipay account • Refuses LC or Escrow |
Terminate: Major fraud indicator. 2026 avg loss: $187k (ICC Fraud Survey) |
| Evasion of Physical Audit | • “Factory is too busy” for visits • Offers only virtual tour via Zoom • Demands audit fee paid upfront to unknown entity |
Terminate: Non-compliance with ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.4.2 (supplier monitoring) |
| Document Inconsistencies | • Business license address ≠ factory GPS coordinates • Tax registration mismatch • Expired environmental permits |
Cross-check via: • Qixinbao (企查查) for litigation history • Local Ecology Bureau portals for permit status |
| Overpromising on Compliance | Claims “full EU compliance” without specific certs States “no subcontractors used” despite complex product |
Demand certification serial numbers; verify via official databases (e.g., ANAB for ISO) |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Embed Compliance in RFQs: Require factories to submit CBAM carbon calculations and CSDDD due diligence templates before quotation.
- Adopt Phased Payments: 10% deposit → 30% after raw material verification → 50% post-shipment audit → 10% after 90-day performance review.
- Leverage AI Verification: Use SourcifyChina’s Supply Chain Integrity Platform (patent-pending) to cross-analyze 27+ data points from Chinese government portals in real-time.
- Contractual Safeguards: Include audit rights, subcontractor approval clauses, and compliance termination triggers in all agreements.
“In 2026, the cost of a single undetected trading company masquerading as a factory exceeds 22 weeks of sourcing manager salary. Verification isn’t cost – it’s insurance.”
– SourcifyChina Global Risk Advisory Board
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Data Sources: China National Bureau of Statistics, ICC Fraud Survey 2025, SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q1 2026)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
For verification protocol implementation: contact [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage: Accelerate Your China Sourcing with Verified Expertise
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain landscape, time-to-market is a decisive competitive factor. For procurement leaders sourcing from China, the complexity of vetting reliable suppliers, managing quality control, and navigating compliance risks can significantly delay product launches and inflate operational costs.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List is engineered to eliminate these inefficiencies. Our verified network of sourcing service providers undergoes rigorous due diligence—covering operational history, client references, audit compliance, and performance metrics—ensuring you work only with trusted partners.
Why the Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Providers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of supplier research, background checks, and initial outreach per project |
| Performance Transparency | Access to verified client reviews and service benchmarks enables faster, data-driven decisions |
| Reduced Onboarding Time | Pro List partners are contract-ready, with documented QC processes, SLAs, and communication protocols |
| Risk Mitigation | Minimizes exposure to fraud, miscommunication, and quality failures—common with unverified sourcing agents |
| Scalable Engagement | One-click access to specialists by industry (electronics, hard goods, textiles, etc.) accelerates multi-vendor sourcing |
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Delay is cost. Uncertainty is risk. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted sourcing partners—cutting your supplier qualification cycle by up to 70%.
Don’t navigate China’s complex supply ecosystem alone. Let SourcifyChina de-risk and accelerate your procurement pipeline.
👉 Contact our team now to receive your complimentary Pro List access and sourcing consultation:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Our sourcing consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00 AM–6:00 PM CST, to discuss your 2026 procurement goals and match you with the right Pro List partners.
SourcifyChina – Trusted. Verified. Efficient.
Your Strategic Partner in Global Sourcing Excellence.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
