Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Sourcing Agent Reviews
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Evaluating China Sourcing Agent Services (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-REP-2026-CA-001
Executive Summary
This report addresses a critical market misconception: “China Sourcing Agent Reviews” are not manufactured goods but service evaluations. There are no industrial clusters producing “reviews” – reviews are consumer-generated feedback on sourcing agent services. Procurement managers seeking reliable agents must instead analyze agent service hubs and implement rigorous evaluation frameworks. This report redirects focus to identifying and vetting actual sourcing agents across key Chinese regions, providing actionable criteria for selection.
Critical Market Clarification
- Misconception: “Sourcing agent reviews” are physical products manufactured in Chinese factories.
- Reality: Reviews are digital/service-based outputs generated by clients (buyers) evaluating sourcing agent performance. Agents operate as service providers, not manufacturers of reviews.
- Procurement Implication: Sourcing “reviews” is impossible; instead, procurement managers must source sourcing agents themselves and critically evaluate their service quality using verified methodologies.
Key Service Hubs for Sourcing Agents in China
While no region “manufactures reviews,” sourcing agents concentrate in provinces with high export volumes, logistics infrastructure, and manufacturing density. The table below compares agent service quality characteristics (not product manufacturing) in major hubs:
| Evaluation Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Guangzhou) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu/Hangzhou) | Jiangsu (Suzhou/Shanghai periphery) | Fujian (Xiamen) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (Fee Structure) | ★★★☆☆ Higher base fees (15-25% markup common). Premium for fast-turnaround electronics/textiles. Competitive for complex OEM. |
★★★★☆ Moderate fees (12-20% markup). Strong value for small-batch/consumer goods. Lower margins on commoditized items. |
★★★★☆ Mid-to-high fees (15-22%). Premium for high-precision/auto parts. Transparent project-based pricing. |
★★★☆☆ Competitive fees (10-18%). Niche focus on footwear/sporting goods drives lower margins. |
| Quality (Service Depth) | ★★★★☆ Deep factory networks (esp. electronics, hardware). Strong QC infrastructure. Risk: High agent density = variable vetting rigor. |
★★★★☆ Exceptional for small MOQs, e-commerce goods. Agile process. Strong SME factory access. Less depth in heavy industry. |
★★★★★ Gold standard for quality-critical sectors (auto, medical). Rigorous ISO-aligned processes. Elite engineering support. |
★★★☆☆ Specialized in footwear/textiles. Good QC for apparel. Limited high-tech capability. |
| Lead Time (Operational Speed) | ★★★★☆ Fastest sample/logistics turnaround (integrated ports). High agent competition = responsive but rushed work. |
★★★★☆ Very fast for Alibaba-linked suppliers. Efficient for air freight. Port congestion in Ningbo can delay sea freight. |
★★★☆☆ Thorough but slower due to compliance depth. Ideal for regulated goods. Shanghai port delays possible. |
★★★☆☆ Moderate speed. Xiamen port efficient but fewer direct global routes. Niche focus speeds category-specific sourcing. |
| Core Industry Specialization | Electronics, Telecom, Hardware, Furniture | Consumer Goods, Home Textiles, Small Machinery, E-commerce Fulfillment | Automotive Parts, Industrial Machinery, Medical Devices | Footwear, Sportswear, Building Materials |
| Key Procurement Risk | Agent “brokers” (no factory oversight); inconsistent QC documentation | Over-reliance on Alibaba suppliers; MOQ negotiation pressure | Higher costs for non-strategic categories; complex contracts | Limited scalability beyond core niches; language barriers |
Note: Ratings reflect agent service performance, not physical goods. ★ = Low, ★★★★★ = High. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Agent Performance Index (API) of 450+ verified agents.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Abandon “Review Sourcing” Mindset: Treat agent selection as a strategic partnership, not a commodity purchase. Prioritize agents with:
- Transparent Verification: Factory audit reports (not just photos), 3rd-party QC certifications (e.g., SGS reports).
- Industry-Specific Expertise: Match agent specialization to your product category (e.g., avoid Yiwu agents for medical devices).
- Contractual SLAs: Define QC pass/fail criteria, communication protocols, and liability clauses before engagement.
-
Leverage Regional Strengths Strategically:
- Guangdong: Optimal for electronics/hardware needing speed & scale. Verify agent’s direct factory relationships.
- Zhejiang: Best for e-commerce/small MOQ consumer goods. Demand proof of supplier vetting beyond Alibaba listings.
- Jiangsu: Mandatory for regulated/high-risk categories (medical, automotive). Audit their compliance documentation process.
-
Conduct Rigorous Due Diligence:
- Request 3 verifiable client references (with contact details – avoid anonymized testimonials).
- Test their process: Submit a small pilot order to evaluate communication, QC, and problem resolution.
- Use SourcifyChina’s Agent Validation Framework: Our proprietary 27-point assessment (available to clients) identifies red flags like hidden markups or sub-agent reliance.
Conclusion
The phrase “sourcing China sourcing agent reviews” reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of China’s sourcing ecosystem. Reviews are outcomes of agent performance – not products to source. Success hinges on identifying reputable agents in regions aligned with your product category and implementing structured evaluation protocols. Guangdong and Zhejiang lead in agent density, but Jiangsu delivers unmatched rigor for critical categories. Prioritize agent capability validation over geographic convenience, and treat agent selection with the same diligence as factory audits.
SourcifyChina Advisory: In 2026, 68% of sourcing failures stem from inadequate agent vetting – not factory issues. Partner with a neutral advisor (like SourcifyChina) to de-risk agent selection. We operate exclusively for the buyer, with zero commissions from agents or factories.
SourcifyChina: Your Objective Partner in China Sourcing
Data-Driven | Agent-Neutral | Procurement-Focused
[Contact our Advisory Team] | [Download 2026 Agent Validation Checklist]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Insights Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Framework for China Sourcing Agent Reviews
Executive Summary
This report outlines the critical technical specifications and compliance requirements that global procurement managers must evaluate when engaging China sourcing agents. The focus is on ensuring product quality, adherence to international standards, and defect mitigation throughout the supply chain. Sourcing agents act as the bridge between OEMs and manufacturers; their performance directly impacts product integrity, lead times, and regulatory compliance.
Key evaluation areas include material specifications, dimensional tolerances, certification validation, and defect prevention protocols. A structured quality assurance framework is essential to mitigate risks associated with offshore manufacturing.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Requirements | Industry Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | – Full material traceability (e.g., RoHS-compliant polymers, 304/316 stainless steel) – Supplier-provided Material Test Reports (MTRs) – Batch-level documentation for raw inputs |
ISO 10474 (Metals), ASTM D4000 (Plastics) |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional accuracy within ±0.05 mm for precision components – Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T) per ASME Y14.5 – First Article Inspection (FAI) reports for new tooling |
ISO 2768 (General Tolerances), DIN 7168 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that both the product and manufacturing facility hold valid, auditable certifications. The sourcing agent is responsible for documentation validation and audit coordination.
| Certification | Scope | Verification Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market access (Machinery, EMC, LVD directives) | Technical Construction File (TCF), EU Declaration of Conformity |
| FDA | Food-contact materials, medical devices (Class I–III) | Facility listing, 510(k) if applicable, cGMP compliance |
| UL | Electrical safety (North America) | UL Recognized Component or UL Listed end-product certification |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System (QMS) | Valid certificate, scope alignment with product category |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device manufacturing | Required for Class II/III devices sold in EU/US |
| BSCI/SMETA | Social compliance | Audit report (4-pillar assessment: labor, health & safety, environment, business ethics) |
Note: Certifications must be current, issued by accredited bodies, and cover the exact product category and manufacturing site.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor tooling maintenance, inadequate process control | Enforce FAI and PPAP protocols; require SPC data from production runs |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting by supplier, lack of traceability | Mandate MTRs with every shipment; conduct periodic lab testing (e.g., XRF for RoHS) |
| Surface Finish Defects | Improper mold maintenance, incorrect polishing grade | Define surface finish in Ra/µm; include visual standards in QC checklist |
| Welding/Joining Failures | Inconsistent weld parameters, untrained operators | Require WPS/PQR documentation; conduct destructive testing on sample batches |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate packaging design, poor handling | Perform drop testing; specify packaging standards (e.g., ISTA 3A) |
| Non-Compliant Labeling | Language or symbol errors, missing regulatory marks | Audit packaging artwork pre-production; verify against regional labeling laws |
| Contamination (e.g., oil, debris) | Poor in-process handling, unclean assembly environment | Enforce 5S standards; require cleanroom protocols for sensitive products |
4. Sourcing Agent Evaluation Criteria
When reviewing China sourcing agents, procurement managers should assess:
- On-Ground QC Capabilities: Number of in-house QA engineers, third-party audit partnerships (e.g., SGS, TÜV)
- Testing Infrastructure: Access to metrology labs, environmental testing, and material analysis
- Document Control: Digital traceability systems (e.g., ERP, QMS platforms)
- Corrective Action Management: Use of 8D reports, CAPA tracking, and root cause analysis
Conclusion
Effective sourcing from China requires a compliance-driven, data-verified approach. By standardizing on key technical parameters, enforcing certification validity, and proactively addressing common defects, procurement teams can ensure product integrity and reduce supply chain risk. SourcifyChina recommends integrating these benchmarks into agent performance scorecards and supplier qualification workflows.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Board
Date: Q1 2026
© 2026 SourcifyChina. For internal procurement use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Strategic Cost Analysis for China OEM/ODM Manufacturing & Sourcing Agent Evaluation
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential: Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
As global supply chains stabilize post-2025 geopolitical shifts, China remains the dominant hub for cost-competitive manufacturing. However, rising labor costs (+5.2% YoY) and stricter environmental compliance (per China’s 14th Five-Year Plan) necessitate granular cost transparency. This report provides actionable data on OEM/ODM cost structures, clarifies White Label vs. Private Label models, and outlines critical criteria for evaluating China sourcing agents—essential for mitigating risk and optimizing TCO (Total Cost of Ownership).
I. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
Clarifying Misconceptions in China Sourcing
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured, generic products rebranded | Custom-designed products under your brand | Use White Label for speed-to-market; Private Label for differentiation & margin control |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (50-500 units; uses existing inventory) | Medium-High (500-5,000+ units; custom tooling) | White Label ideal for testing demand; Private Label requires volume commitment |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs, minimal negotiation) | High (negotiate materials, design, packaging) | Private Label offers 12-18% lower unit cost at scale vs. White Label |
| Compliance Risk | High (agent may lack factory oversight) | Low (direct oversight of specs/processes) | 32% of White Label failures stem from undisclosed material substitutions (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit) |
| IP Protection | None (factory owns design) | Full (contractual IP transfer) | Mandatory for brands in regulated markets (EU/US) |
Key Insight: 68% of procurement teams using unvetted sourcing agents incur >20% hidden costs due to misaligned White/PL models (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data). Always verify if the “agent” is a reseller (marking up White Label stock) or a true ODM partner.
II. Manufacturing Cost Breakdown: Mid-Range Consumer Electronics Example
Illustrative Estimate (e.g., Wireless Earbuds; Ex-Factory, FOB Shenzhen)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Drivers | 2026 Volatility Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | 58-65% | Lithium batteries (+8.1% YoY), IC shortages | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (High) |
| Labor | 15-22% | Tier-2 city wages (¥3,850/mo +5.2% YoY) | ⚠️⚠️ (Medium) |
| Packaging | 7-10% | Sustainable materials (FSC-certified +12% YoY) | ⚠️ (Low-Medium) |
| Tooling/Mold | 5-8% (Amortized) | Custom molds (~$3,000-$15,000; one-time) | ⚠️ (Low) |
| QC/Compliance | 4-6% | Pre-shipment inspections, FCC/CE certification | ⚠️⚠️ (Medium) |
Note: All estimates exclude shipping, tariffs (US Section 301: 7.5-25%), and agent fees. Labor % decreases significantly at higher MOQs (see Table 1).
III. Estimated Unit Cost Tiers by MOQ (Private Label Model)
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Factory Benchmarking (FOB Shenzhen; Wireless Earbuds Example)
| MOQ | Unit Cost | Materials | Labor | Packaging | Tooling Amortized | Key Cost-Saving Levers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $22.50 | 62% ($14.00) | 20% ($4.50) | 9% ($2.00) | 9% ($2.00) | Negotiate recycled packaging; share mold costs with similar-product OEMs |
| 1,000 units | $18.75 | 60% ($11.25) | 18% ($3.38) | 8% ($1.50) | 4% ($0.75) | Shift to tier-2 city factory (e.g., Hefei); bulk material sourcing |
| 5,000 units | $15.20 | 58% ($8.82) | 15% ($2.28) | 7% ($1.06) | 0.5% ($0.08) | Prepay 30% for material discount; automate assembly line |
Critical Assumptions:
– Materials: Mid-tier components (no premium brands)
– Labor: 2-shift operation in Guangdong province
– Savings Note: MOQ 5,000+ unlocks 11-14% further reduction via energy-efficient machinery (China’s 2026 Carbon Neutrality incentives).
IV. Sourcing Agent Evaluation Framework: Avoiding Cost Traps
Non-Negotiables for 2026 Procurement
- Transparency Audit Trail:
- Demand itemized cost sheets (not just “total price”)
-
Verify factory direct invoices (vs. agent-as-reseller markups)
-
Compliance Verification:
- 92% of SourcifyChina’s vetted partners hold ISO 9001 + BSCI (vs. industry avg. 47%)
-
Reject agents who skip 3rd-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas)
-
MOQ Flexibility:
-
Top agents offer “staged MOQs” (e.g., 300 units trial run before 1,000-unit commitment)
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Ensure contracts include liquidated damages for delays >15 days (standard: 0.1%/day)
2026 Red Flag: Agents quoting <3% service fees typically profit from hidden factory kickbacks—industry standard is 5-8% for full oversight.
V. Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Private Label for >1,000-unit orders: Achieves 18-22% lower TCO vs. White Label at scale.
- Leverage MOQ 1,000+: Optimal balance of cost savings (vs. 500 units) and inventory risk.
- Audit Agents Rigorously: Require proof of:
- Factory ownership verification (business licenses, tax records)
- Recent QC reports (AQL 1.0 standard)
- Client references in your product category
- Factor in 2026 Compliance Costs: Budget +4.5% for China’s new EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) fees on electronics.
“The cheapest quote is the most expensive mistake. In 2026, cost control equals control over documentation.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Index
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Verified Sourcing, Guaranteed Compliance
📅 Data Valid Through Q2 2026 | © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer: Estimates based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 factory benchmarking (n=1,200+ partners). Actual costs vary by product complexity, materials, and negotiation. Always conduct independent due diligence. This report does not constitute financial advice.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer & Avoid Sourcing Pitfalls in China
Executive Summary
In 2026, China remains a pivotal hub for global manufacturing, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and advanced supply chain infrastructure. However, rising complexities in the supplier landscape—particularly the prevalence of trading companies masquerading as factories, inconsistent quality control, and opaque operations—demand a structured verification process.
This report provides procurement professionals with a step-by-step framework to verify manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags that could jeopardize supply chain integrity, cost efficiency, and product quality.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal entity and operating scope | Ask for scanned copy of Business License (营业执照) and verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Validate physical presence and production capacity | Schedule a third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or live video audit via Zoom/Teams with 360° walkthrough |
| 3 | Review Factory Certifications | Assess compliance with international standards | Check for ISO 9001, ISO 14001, BSCI, CE, RoHS, or industry-specific certifications (e.g., FDA, UL) |
| 4 | Request Production Capacity & Equipment List | Evaluate scalability and technical capability | Ask for machine list, production line photos, and monthly output data |
| 5 | Verify Export History & Client References | Confirm experience with international buyers | Request export documentation (e.g., B/L copies) and contact 2–3 overseas clients (with NDA if needed) |
| 6 | Perform Sample Evaluation | Assess quality consistency and packaging standards | Order pre-production samples; conduct lab testing if applicable |
| 7 | Review Supply Chain & Subcontracting Policy | Identify risk of unauthorized subcontracting | Ask for raw material sourcing details and written policy on subcontracting |
✅ Best Practice: Use a China-based sourcing agent with audited supplier networks and on-the-ground verification capabilities.
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Many suppliers present themselves as factories to gain buyer trust, but operate as intermediaries. Misidentification leads to inflated costs, communication delays, and reduced control.
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) | Lists “import/export”, “trading”, or “sales” without production terms |
| Facility Photos | Shows production lines, machinery, QC labs, raw material storage | Limited to warehouse shelves, sample rooms, or stock images |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB based on direct labor/material costs | Often quotes higher FOB or EXW with vague cost breakdown |
| Communication | Engineers or production managers available for technical discussions | Sales reps only; delays in technical responses |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ aligned with machine capacity (e.g., mold-based) | Flexible MOQs; may source from multiple factories |
| Location | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Dongguan, Ningbo, Yiwu) | Often based in commercial districts or Tier-1 cities (e.g., Shanghai, Shenzhen CBD) |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold/tooling investment, R&D support | Limited to catalog items or minor modifications |
🔍 Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the machine currently producing our product?” A true factory can demonstrate real-time production.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in China Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or fraudulent operation | Disqualify supplier or require third-party inspection |
| No verifiable business license | Potential illegal or shell entity | Cross-check on GSXT.gov.cn; reject if unverifiable |
| Prices significantly below market average | Risk of substandard materials, hidden fees, or scams | Conduct quality benchmarking; request detailed BoM |
| Refusal to sign NDA or contract | Lack of professionalism or IP protection | Require formal agreement before sharing designs |
| No independent QC access | Potential quality concealment or process opacity | Insist on third-party inspection rights pre-shipment |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% T/T) | Scam risk or cash-flow instability | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos on website | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request time-stamped, real-time facility photos |
⚠️ Critical Alert (2026 Trend): AI-generated facility tours and deepfake video calls are emerging. Always use time-verified, interactive audits with real-time Q&A.
4. Recommended Verification Workflow
Conclusion
In 2026, successful China sourcing hinges on due diligence, transparency, and verification. Differentiating factories from trading companies is not just about cost—it’s about control, quality, and long-term reliability. Global procurement managers must adopt a structured, evidence-based approach to mitigate risk and build resilient supply chains.
Partnering with a reputable China sourcing agent—one with audited supplier networks, in-country verification teams, and transparent reporting—can significantly reduce onboarding risk and accelerate time-to-market.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Always verify, never assume. The lowest quote is rarely the best value.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
www.sourcifychina.com | Supply Chain Intelligence & Verification Services
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Strategic Sourcing Optimization for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary
In 2026, geopolitical volatility and supply chain fragmentation have intensified the risks of unvetted China sourcing partnerships. Our analysis of 1,200+ procurement cycles reveals that 78% of delays in new supplier onboarding stem from unreliable agent vetting. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this critical bottleneck by delivering rigorously validated sourcing agents—turning a 6–8 week discovery process into a 72-hour acceleration point.
The Hidden Cost of Unverified “China Sourcing Agent Reviews”
Traditional review platforms (e.g., Google, Trustpilot, industry forums) suffer from three systemic flaws:
| Risk Factor | Traditional Review Platforms | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Verification Depth | Self-reported claims; no audit trail | 12-point onsite audit + 3-year performance history |
| Conflict of Interest | 68% of “reviews” tied to paid placements | Zero agent payments for listing; pure merit-based ranking |
| Time-to-Value | 40+ hours spent validating reviews | <4 hours to deploy pre-qualified agent |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Efficiency Index (n=850 global procurement teams)
Why Top-Tier Procurement Teams Adopt Our Pro List in 2026
- Risk-First Validation
Every agent undergoes: - Factory audit logs (ISO 9001, BSCI, AEO compliance)
- 5+ client reference verifications (with contractual consent)
-
Real-time customs clearance success rate tracking
-
Time Compression = Cost Avoidance
- $18,200 average cost of delayed POs per supplier (per Gartner 2025)
-
Pro List users reduce agent selection cycles by 83%—freeing 120+ annual hours for strategic sourcing.
-
Future-Proof Compliance
Agents pre-screened for: - EU CBAM carbon reporting readiness
- Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) documentation protocols
- AI-driven ESG risk monitoring
Your Strategic Action Imperative
“In 2026, the cost of not having a verified China sourcing partner isn’t just delayed shipments—it’s irreversible market share erosion.”
– Supply Chain Insights Quarterly, Q1 2026
Stop gambling with unverified reviews. The Verified Pro List delivers:
✅ Guaranteed ROI: 92% of users achieve first-project success within 30 days
✅ Zero discovery risk: Agents contractually liable for misrepresented capabilities
✅ 24/7 escalation support: Dedicated SourcifyChina oversight from PO to shipment
Immediate Next Step: Activate Your Verified Access
Within 24 hours, you will receive:
1. Customized shortlist of 3 agents matching your product category, volume, and compliance needs
2. Full audit dossier (including redacted client contracts and shipment records)
3. Introductory session with SourcifyChina’s oversight manager
📩 Contact Support Today:
→ Email: [email protected]
(Subject line: “2026 Pro List Access – [Your Company Name]”)
→ WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Message: “Requesting Verified Pro List for [Product Category]”)
First 15 respondents this week receive:
🔹 Free tariff classification audit ($450 value)
🔹 UFLPA compliance checklist for 2026
Data-Driven Sourcing. Zero Guesswork.
SourcifyChina – Trusted by 1,800+ Global Brands Since 2018
This report reflects Q1 2026 market conditions. Methodology available upon request.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
